Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (57)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = history of anaphylaxis

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
23 pages, 2154 KB  
Article
Does Previous Anaphylaxis Determine Differences Between Patients Undergoing Oral Food Challenges to Cow’s Milk and Hen’s Egg?
by Liliana Klim, Maria Michalik, Paweł Wąsowicz, Ewa Cichocka-Jarosz and Urszula Jedynak-Wąsowicz
Nutrients 2026, 18(2), 302; https://doi.org/10.3390/nu18020302 (registering DOI) - 18 Jan 2026
Abstract
Background: Oral food challenges (OFCs) are still the reference standard for confirming food allergy, yet the influence of previous anaphylaxis on challenge outcomes remains uncertain. Patients with a history of anaphylaxis are often considered at higher risk, which may affect the clinical decision-making [...] Read more.
Background: Oral food challenges (OFCs) are still the reference standard for confirming food allergy, yet the influence of previous anaphylaxis on challenge outcomes remains uncertain. Patients with a history of anaphylaxis are often considered at higher risk, which may affect the clinical decision-making process. This study aimed to identify predictors of OFC failure stratified by a history of anaphylaxis, given that prior investigations have predominantly considered anaphylaxis as an overall risk factor, without delineating distinct risk factor profiles according to anaphylaxis history. Methods: We conducted a retrospective evaluation of standard-of-care pediatric OFCs to cow’s milk and hen’s egg white. Eligible children had suspected or confirmed IgE-mediated allergy to cow’s milk protein (CMP) or hen’s egg white protein (HEWP) and were stratified by the presence or absence of previous anaphylaxis to the challenged food. Clinical data were compared between groups. Open OFCs were conducted under inpatient supervision with full emergency support. Logistic regression models were used to assess the relationship between comorbidities, specific IgE (sIgE) concentrations and OFC outcomes. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis evaluated diagnostic accuracy of sIgE concentrations in predicting OFC outcomes. Results: The analysis included 192 pediatric patients undergoing OFCs: 106 to CMP and 86 to HEWP. Six challenges (3.1%) were inconclusive, giving 186 valid results. The overall OFC failure rate was 32.3%. Patients with a past history of anaphylaxis more frequently underwent cow’s milk challenges (p = 0.01). Atopic dermatitis was a more common comorbidity in those without prior anaphylaxis (p = 0.04), regardless of the trigger. In hen’s egg challenges, children with a history of anaphylaxis reacted to significantly lower cumulative doses (p = 0.03) than patients without. Atopic dermatitis was identified as a predictor of OFC failure in children without prior anaphylaxis (p = 0.02), and asthma as a borderline predictor in those with previous systemic reactions (p = 0.05). Specific IgE concentrations correlated with OFC outcomes across allergens, with casein-sIgE showing the highest discriminative performance (AUC = 0.81) in children without previous anaphylaxis. Conclusions: Atopic dermatitis and asthma were identified as potential risk factors influencing OFC outcomes, depending on the patient’s history of anaphylaxis. The predictive accuracy of sIgE was different in groups stratified by presence of prior anaphylaxis, and the relationship between sIgE concentration and clinical reactivity was not identical across the two subpopulations. Casein-sIgE showed the highest diagnostic accuracy in children without previous severe reactions to CMP. Presence of anaphylactic reactions in the past is an important consideration when selecting children for OFCs to CMP and HEWP, since it delineates distinct risk factors for challenge failure in these patient populations. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Dietary Strategies and Mechanistic Insights in Pediatric Allergies)
Show Figures

Figure 1

11 pages, 825 KB  
Article
Adult Food Allergy Is an Under-Recognized Health Problem in Northwestern Mexico: A Population-Based Cross-Sectional Survey
by Lizbeth Vizcarra-Olguin, Marcela de Jesús Vergara-Jiménez, Juancarlos Manuel Velásquez-Rodríguez, Oscar Gerardo Figueroa-Salcido, Elisa María Barrón-Cabrera, Perla Y. Gutiérrez-Arzapalo, Fernando Salas-López, Noé Ontiveros and Jesús Gilberto Arámburo-Gálvez
Epidemiologia 2025, 6(4), 85; https://doi.org/10.3390/epidemiologia6040085 - 2 Dec 2025
Viewed by 521
Abstract
Objectives: To estimate the prevalence, clinical characteristics, and risk factors of IgE-mediated food allergy (FA) in adults from northwestern Mexico. Methods: A population-based, cross-sectional study was conducted in Culiacán, Sinaloa. A validated questionnaire was administered to 834 adults (valid response rate: 87.5%) in [...] Read more.
Objectives: To estimate the prevalence, clinical characteristics, and risk factors of IgE-mediated food allergy (FA) in adults from northwestern Mexico. Methods: A population-based, cross-sectional study was conducted in Culiacán, Sinaloa. A validated questionnaire was administered to 834 adults (valid response rate: 87.5%) in public spaces. Prevalence rates (95% CI) were calculated, and associations were analyzed using odds ratios (OR). Results: The prevalence rates of “current immediate-type FA”, “food-induced anaphylaxis” and adult-onset “current immediate-type FA” were 5.75% (4.27–7.49), 2.5% (1.75–4.10) and 2.99% (1.94–4.39), respectively. The most common allergens were shellfish (2.14% (1.28–3.39)) and milk (1.19% (0.57–2.19)). Epinephrine was prescribed in 9.5% of the cases with anaphylaxis history. General practitioners made the diagnosis of 63.4% of the FA cases. FA was associated with personal and family history of atopy. Conclusions: Adult FA is frequent in the population studied and could be an emerging public health problem, characterized by a high rate of adult-onset cases and suboptimal management of anaphylaxis. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

13 pages, 978 KB  
Article
Adverse Reactions to CT Contrast Agents: A 10-Year Study of Clinical and Environmental Risk Factors
by Min-gyu Kim, Hojin Kim, Kwangmin Lee, Wonseok Yang, Eun-ju Kang and Yongsu Yoon
Diagnostics 2025, 15(22), 2820; https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics15222820 - 7 Nov 2025
Viewed by 2252
Abstract
Background: Iodinated contrast agents are widely used in computed tomography (CT) imaging; however, they can cause adverse drug reactions (ADRs) ranging from mild hypersensitivity to severe anaphylaxis. While several clinical risk factors have been identified, large–scale studies incorporating environmental variables remain limited. [...] Read more.
Background: Iodinated contrast agents are widely used in computed tomography (CT) imaging; however, they can cause adverse drug reactions (ADRs) ranging from mild hypersensitivity to severe anaphylaxis. While several clinical risk factors have been identified, large–scale studies incorporating environmental variables remain limited. This study aimed to assess the prevalence and predictors of contrast agent-related ADRs over a 10-year period. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 221,962 adult outpatients who underwent contrast-enhanced CT between January 2014 and December 2023 at a single tertiary center: Patient characteristics, clinical conditions (e.g., hypertension, allergy history), contrast agent types, premedication status, seasonal trends, temperature, and humidity were examined. ADRs were categorized as mild, moderate, or severe based on American College of Radiology (ACR) guidelines. Logistic regression was used to identify independent predictors. Results: The overall prevalence of ADRs was 0.64% (1423 cases). ADRs were more frequent in females, younger patients, and those receiving premedication. Seasonal and environmental patterns were evident: higher ADR rates occurred in summer and autumn, with positive correlations to ambient temperature and humidity. Among contrast agents, Ioversol (1.4%) and Iomeprol (1.2%) showed the highest ADR rates. The prevalence of mild ADRs increased in the post–COVID-19 period, while that of moderate reactions declined. Conclusions: This real–world study identified multiple clinical and environmental factors associated with ADRs to iodinated contrast agents in CT imaging. The findings suggest the importance of individualized risk assessment and the consideration of environmental factors when planning contrast administration. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

8 pages, 936 KB  
Case Report
Alpha-Gal Syndrome—A Series of Cases with Different Clinical Pictures
by Olga Branicka, Lesia Rozłucka, Radosław Gawlik and Joanna Glück
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2025, 26(17), 8601; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms26178601 - 4 Sep 2025
Viewed by 5358
Abstract
Alpha-gal syndrome (AGS) is an IgE-mediated allergy, triggered by a carbohydrate—galactose-α-1,3-galactose (α-Gal). AGS is marked by a delayed onset of symptoms, typically occurring 3–8 h after the ingestion of red meat or other mammalian-derived products. The primary risk factor is believed to be [...] Read more.
Alpha-gal syndrome (AGS) is an IgE-mediated allergy, triggered by a carbohydrate—galactose-α-1,3-galactose (α-Gal). AGS is marked by a delayed onset of symptoms, typically occurring 3–8 h after the ingestion of red meat or other mammalian-derived products. The primary risk factor is believed to be tick bites, which sensitize individuals through the introduction of α-Gal via tick saliva. Diagnosis of AGS is based on a combination of anamnesis and detection of α-Gal-specific IgE antibodies. We evaluated 28 patients with a history of unexplained anaphylaxis, angioedema, and/or urticaria, in whom the diagnostic work-up included the assessment of serum IgE specific to alpha-gal. Elevated alpha-gal-specific IgE levels were detected in five patients. Among them, four reported anaphylactic episodes following meat consumption. In three cases, symptoms developed during the evening or nighttime, typically 3 to 6 h after the last meal. One patient experienced anaphylaxis within one hour after a meal. Another patient presented angioedema up to 24 h after meat consumption and was also tested positive for specific IgE against beef and pork allergens. The AGS case series showed variability in clinical picture and time to reaction. In patients presenting idiopathic anaphylaxis and nonspecific symptoms after red meat consumption, AGS should be considered as a differential diagnosis. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Molecular Therapeutic Strategies in Allergic Diseases)
Show Figures

Figure 1

21 pages, 958 KB  
Article
Asthma and Multi-Food Allergy Are Risk Factors for Oral Food Challenge Failure—A Single-Center Experience
by Liliana Klim, Maria Michalik, Ewa Cichocka-Jarosz and Urszula Jedynak-Wąsowicz
Nutrients 2025, 17(17), 2769; https://doi.org/10.3390/nu17172769 - 27 Aug 2025
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 3044
Abstract
Background: Diagnosing food allergy (FA) typically involves a detailed clinical history and confirmation of allergen-specific IgE. Oral food challenges (OFCs) remain the gold standard in FA diagnosis. This study aimed to present our experience in performing OFCs in pediatric patients with particular focus [...] Read more.
Background: Diagnosing food allergy (FA) typically involves a detailed clinical history and confirmation of allergen-specific IgE. Oral food challenges (OFCs) remain the gold standard in FA diagnosis. This study aimed to present our experience in performing OFCs in pediatric patients with particular focus on challenges performed with cow’s milk and hen’s egg. Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of 205 OFCs. Clinical data were evaluated and multiple logistic regression was used to identify associations between challenge outcomes, reaction severity, and comorbidities. Results: The mean age of patients was 5.7 ± 3.1 years, with 135 (65.9%) being male. The tested foods included cow’s milk protein (CMP, 103 challenges; 50.2%), hen’s egg white protein (HEWP, 84; 41.0%), peanuts (3; 1.5%), tree nuts (4; 2.0%), gluten (3; 1.5%), hen’s egg yolk (4; 2.0%), and other foods (4; 2.0%). The overall OFC failure rate was 32.2%, and five challenges (2.4%) yielded inconclusive results. The median cumulative reactive dose was 0.27 g for baked CMP and 0.58 g for baked HEWP. Most failed OFCs involved mucocutaneous symptoms (44 cases; 66.7%). Severe multisystemic reactions occurred in four patients (2.0%), all of whom required epinephrine (6.1% of positive challenges). An increased risk of OFC failure was associated with asthma (p = 0.028; 95% CI: 0.07–1.27) and multi-food allergy (p = 0.021; 95% CI: 0.14–1.67). Additionally, the coexistence of asthma and a prior history of anaphylaxis to any food was related to OFC failure (p = 0.049; 95% CI: 0.01–2.19), as was the combination of multi-food allergy and previous anaphylaxis (p = 0.043; 95% CI: 0.03–1.70). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was utilized to predict outcomes of OFCs to baked milk and baked egg and determined a specific IgE (sIgE) cutoff level of 58.1 kU/L for baked milk challenges (AUC: 0.77; sensitivity: 0.588; specificity: 0.882), and 11.3 kU/L for baked egg challenges (AUC: 0.66; sensitivity: 0.692; specificity: 0.607). Conclusions: Our findings confirm that OFCs are a safe and effective tool for diagnosing FA in children. With appropriate patient selection, the risk of severe reactions remains low. Nonetheless, comorbidities such as asthma and multi-food allergy are associated with an increased likelihood of OFC failure. Full article
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

10 pages, 586 KB  
Article
Possession of Injectable Epinephrine Among Children with Parent-Reported Food Allergies in Saudi Arabia
by Amer Khojah, Ameera Bukhari, Ibrahim Alibrahim, Maria AlSulami, Turki Alotaibi, Ruba Alotaibi, Elaf Bahareth, Inam Abulreish, Sumayyah Alsuruji, Raghad Rajab, Loie Goronfolah, Mohammad Binhussein, Adeeb Bulkhi, Saddiq Habiballah and Imad Khojah
J. Clin. Med. 2025, 14(15), 5274; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14155274 - 25 Jul 2025
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1220
Abstract
Background/Objectives: A food allergy (FA) is an immune-mediated hypersensitivity reaction to specific food. FA reactions vary from mild to life-threatening anaphylaxis. Despite the effectiveness of epinephrine auto-injectors (EAIs), barriers such as lack of knowledge, limited access, and fear of needles hinder their [...] Read more.
Background/Objectives: A food allergy (FA) is an immune-mediated hypersensitivity reaction to specific food. FA reactions vary from mild to life-threatening anaphylaxis. Despite the effectiveness of epinephrine auto-injectors (EAIs), barriers such as lack of knowledge, limited access, and fear of needles hinder their use. This study explores EAI possession among children with parent-reported food allergies in Saudi Arabia. Methods: A cross-sectional study conducted from October 2023 to February 2024 included 296 parents of children with reported food allergies under the age of 18. Data were collected through a validated self-administered questionnaire. Results: Among 2102 respondents, 296 (14.1%) reported having a child with a food allergy. Most respondents were female (70%), with asthma being the most common comorbidity (26%). Common allergens included eggs, tree nuts, peanuts, milk, and sesame. Only 23.3% of children had an EAI. Higher EAI possession was associated with parental education, maternal allergy history, and access to specialist care. Conclusions: EAI possession among Saudi children with food allergies is suboptimal. Targeted educational interventions, increased access to allergists, and comprehensive management plans are essential to improve preparedness for anaphylaxis. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Allergic Diseases Across the Lifespan: From Infancy to Old Age)
Show Figures

Figure 1

24 pages, 1694 KB  
Article
Belgian Case Series Identifies Non-Cow Mammalian Milk Allergy as a Rare, Severe, Selective, and Late-Onset Condition
by Sophie Verelst, Robbe Sinnesael, Firoz Taïbi, Sebastian Tuyls, Lieve Coorevits, Christine Breynaert, Dominique Bullens and Rik Schrijvers
Nutrients 2025, 17(15), 2393; https://doi.org/10.3390/nu17152393 - 22 Jul 2025
Viewed by 1255
Abstract
Background: Cow’s milk allergy (CMA) is the most common food allergy in children, typically resolving by adolescence. In contrast, the clinical spectrum of allergies to non-cow mammalian milk and their patterns of IgE cross-reactivity are less well documented. Nutritional differences between various [...] Read more.
Background: Cow’s milk allergy (CMA) is the most common food allergy in children, typically resolving by adolescence. In contrast, the clinical spectrum of allergies to non-cow mammalian milk and their patterns of IgE cross-reactivity are less well documented. Nutritional differences between various mammalian milks may also impact dietary management in milk-allergic patients. Objectives: To characterize clinical features, onset age, and IgE cross-reactivity patterns of non-cow mammalian milk allergies in adult patients seen at a tertiary allergy center, and to compare these findings with published cases. Methods: A retrospective analysis of patients included in the “Extended Laboratory Investigation for Rare Causes of Anaphylaxis study” with mammalian milk allergy was performed using clinical history, skin testing, and serum-specific IgE measurements. Cross-reactivity patterns were assessed in selected cases using immunoblotting, specific IgE inhibition, and basophil activation testing, and compared with published reports of non-cow mammalian milk allergy. Results: In our case series of 22 patients with mammalian milk allergy and 10 healthy control subjects, 3 patients were identified with isolated adult-onset non-cow mammalian milk allergy (n = 1 buffalo milk; n = 2 mare milk), confirmed via immunoblotting and basophil activation testing. Streptavidin-based specific IgE measurement for buffalo cheese was positive in the buffalo milk allergic patient. The literature review identified 82 cases of non-cow mammalian milk allergy. These cases typically showed late onset (mean age 8.6 years; range 1–70 years), severe reactions (CoFAR (Consortium for Food Allergy Research) grade 3 or 4 in 66%, and one fatality), and selective sensitization (affecting sheep and/or goat, camel, mare, buffalo, donkey, or combinations thereof in 56, 10, 5, 5, 4, and 2 cases, respectively). Conclusions: Non-cow mammalian milk allergies are rare but generally present later in life with selective IgE cross-reactivity, differing from the broader cross-reactivity observed in CMA. This selectivity may allow for safe dietary alternatives. These findings underscore the need for improved diagnostics and personalized dietary management in this patient population. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

11 pages, 1715 KB  
Article
Incidence and Factors Associated with Self-Reported Skin Symptoms of Allergic Reactions to COVID-19 Vaccines
by Karnsinee Thanborisutkul, Prapasri Kulalert, Kanthida Methaset, Sira Nanthapisal, Tibet Chunthatikul, Nathamon Phangpanya, Phenpraphatson Charoenying, Worakamon Atsawutmangkru, Suphatsara Srijaroen, Patcharaporn Punyashthira and Orapan Poachanukoon
Vaccines 2025, 13(3), 289; https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines13030289 - 10 Mar 2025
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1869
Abstract
Background: Few reports exist regarding the incidence and factors associated with allergic reactions to COVID-19 vaccines during post-marketing surveillance, especially for inactivated whole virus or viral vector vaccines. We aimed to determine the incidence and factors associated with self-reported allergic reactions to [...] Read more.
Background: Few reports exist regarding the incidence and factors associated with allergic reactions to COVID-19 vaccines during post-marketing surveillance, especially for inactivated whole virus or viral vector vaccines. We aimed to determine the incidence and factors associated with self-reported allergic reactions to COVID-19 vaccines in the Thai population. Methods: A cross-sectional case-control study was conducted via telephone-based interviews. Cases were defined as physician-confirmed, self-reported vaccine recipients diagnosed with non-severe immediate allergic reactions, anaphylaxis, or delayed allergic reactions. Controls were randomly sampled from vaccinated individuals who reported no adverse events and were matched by the type of vaccine (1 case:2 controls). Demographic information and the history of atopic diseases were collected in both groups. Conditional logistic regression analysis was used to explore associated factors. Results: Among 215,079 vaccine doses administered, the incidence of self-reported skin symptoms of allergic reactions was 1821 events (0.85%). The risk factors for allergic reactions included age < 60 years (aOR 3.53; 95% CI:1.43–8.70; p = 0.006), female sex (aOR 8.33; 95% CI: 4.35–15.94; p < 0.001), a personal history of allergic rhinitis (aOR 4.32; 95% CI: 2.43–7.69; p < 0.001), atopic dermatitis (aOR 4.27; 95% CI: 1.74–10.47; p = 0.002), food allergies (aOR 6.53; 95% CI: 2.42–17.61; p < 0.001), and a family history of allergic disease (aOR 2.14; 95% CI: 1.12–4.08; p = 0.021). Conclusions: COVID-19 vaccines showed a low incidence of self-reported allergic reactions, which were more likely to occur in younger individuals, females, and those with a history of atopic diseases. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section COVID-19 Vaccines and Vaccination)
Show Figures

Figure 1

6 pages, 2493 KB  
Case Report
Systemic Signs of an Unexpected Guest in a Case of Apparent Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding Leading to an Endoscopic Extraction of a Foreign Body: A Case Report
by Rareș Crăciun and Cristian Tefas
Reports 2025, 8(1), 26; https://doi.org/10.3390/reports8010026 - 19 Feb 2025
Viewed by 1441
Abstract
Background and Clinical Significance: Upper gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding is a common emergency, typically requiring prompt intervention. This case report presents a unique situation where apparent GI bleeding was ultimately identified as anaphylaxis triggered by accidental wasp ingestion. Such cases are rare, underscoring the [...] Read more.
Background and Clinical Significance: Upper gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding is a common emergency, typically requiring prompt intervention. This case report presents a unique situation where apparent GI bleeding was ultimately identified as anaphylaxis triggered by accidental wasp ingestion. Such cases are rare, underscoring the need for a broad differential diagnosis in atypical presentations. Case Presentation: A 53-year-old male with a history of heavy alcohol use presented with presumed acute hematemesis, hypotension, and tachycardia. An initial examination revealed mild anemia and elevated liver enzymes. An urgent upper GI endoscopy showed severe esophagitis with no signs of active or stigmata of recent bleeding; instead, two dead wasps were found in the gastric antrum. Further inquiry revealed that the patient had recently consumed a home-brewed alcoholic beverage, likely contaminated with the wasps. The patient’s symptoms were then attributed to anaphylaxis from venom exposure rather than hemorrhagic shock. The patient’s condition improved with antihistaminic therapy, and he was discharged with follow-up recommendations. Conclusions: This case highlights the importance of considering rare but critical diagnoses, such as insect-induced anaphylaxis, in patients presenting with presumed GI bleeding. It reinforces the value of thorough history taking, prompt endoscopy, and systematic management in assessing and treating atypical emergency presentations. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Gastroenterology)
Show Figures

Figure 1

12 pages, 1265 KB  
Review
Anaphylaxis with Elevated Procalcitonin Mimicking Sepsis: A Literature Review and Report of Two Cases
by András Bánvölgyi, Kende Lőrincz, Mehdi Boostani, Efrat Bar-Ilan, Bernadett Hidvégi, Márta Medvecz, Norbert Kiss and Norbert M. Wikonkál
J. Clin. Med. 2025, 14(3), 785; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14030785 - 25 Jan 2025
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 2992
Abstract
Objectives: This review examines the role of serum procalcitonin (PCT) as a diagnostic marker for sepsis and its potential implications in anaphylaxis. Elevated PCT levels, often associated with bacterial infections, can complicate diagnosis when seen in anaphylaxis, especially when clinical features overlap [...] Read more.
Objectives: This review examines the role of serum procalcitonin (PCT) as a diagnostic marker for sepsis and its potential implications in anaphylaxis. Elevated PCT levels, often associated with bacterial infections, can complicate diagnosis when seen in anaphylaxis, especially when clinical features overlap with sepsis. Methods: We conducted a literature review on PCT in anaphylaxis to highlight key patterns and present two cases of anaphylactic shock initially misdiagnosed as sepsis due to elevated PCT levels. Results: The review supports that elevated PCT can occur in anaphylaxis, stressing the need for thorough patient history and symptom evaluation. In both cases, elevated PCT led to initial sepsis diagnoses, but further investigation identified anaphylaxis triggered by sulfamethoxazole/trimethoprim (SMX/TMP). Conclusions: These findings emphasize the need for considering anaphylaxis in differential diagnoses when elevated PCT levels are observed. Increased awareness of PCT’s potential association with allergic drug reactions is essential to ensure timely recognition, avoid diagnostic delays, and improve patient outcomes. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue New Diagnostic and Therapeutic Trends in Sepsis and Septic Shock)
Show Figures

Figure 1

8 pages, 427 KB  
Article
Successful Desensitization to Irinotecan in a Patient with Metastatic Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma and a History of Anaphylaxis in Response to Irinotecan—Case Report and Literature Review
by Selda Ali, Denisa-Mihaela Nedelcu, Radu Serescu and Roxana Silvia Bumbăcea
J. Clin. Med. 2024, 13(24), 7824; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13247824 - 21 Dec 2024
Cited by 3 | Viewed by 1773
Abstract
Background: Irinotecan is a topoisomerase I inhibitor used for the treatment of various cancers, such as gastrointestinal, pancreatic, pulmonary, ovarian, and cervical cancers. Among chemotherapy agents, it represents a rare trigger of drug hypersensitivity reactions, with few cases being reported until today. [...] Read more.
Background: Irinotecan is a topoisomerase I inhibitor used for the treatment of various cancers, such as gastrointestinal, pancreatic, pulmonary, ovarian, and cervical cancers. Among chemotherapy agents, it represents a rare trigger of drug hypersensitivity reactions, with few cases being reported until today. Methods: We present the case of a patient with metastatic esophageal cancer and a history of irinotecan-induced grade IV (WAO classification) anaphylaxis. An IgE-mediated reaction was confirmed in our case, as evidenced by a positive intradermal skin test result, and we carried out a successful desensitization protocol, given irinotecan’s indispensability in the treatment regimen. Our case underscores the fact that in such situations where the culprit drug is also the only therapeutic option available for such a patient, implementing a desensitization protocol may represent the only viable approach to ensure safe and successful dosing. Results: A comprehensive review of the literature was also conducted to assess previously reported irinotecan-induced hypersensitivity reactions, the utility of skin tests in identifying sensitisation to irinotecan, and the existing desensitization protocols. We found a total of seventeen cases of hypersensitivity reactions to irinotecan in the literature, out of which four provided the skin test results obtained and six performed desensitization protocols for irinotecan. Conclusions: Our literature review highlights that skin testing and desensitization protocols can provide suitable solutions for managing hypersensitivity reactions to irinotecan. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Dermatology)
Show Figures

Figure 1

15 pages, 752 KB  
Review
Tree Nut Allergy in Children—What Do We Know? —A Review
by Anna Chudoba, Agata Żebrowska and Adam J. Sybilski
Nutrients 2024, 16(23), 3978; https://doi.org/10.3390/nu16233978 - 21 Nov 2024
Cited by 5 | Viewed by 5098
Abstract
Food allergy represents a significant public health concern, with its prevalence increasing in recent decades. Tree nuts are among major allergenic foods, and allergies to them are frequently linked to severe and potentially life-threatening reactions. Data on the prevalence and natural history of [...] Read more.
Food allergy represents a significant public health concern, with its prevalence increasing in recent decades. Tree nuts are among major allergenic foods, and allergies to them are frequently linked to severe and potentially life-threatening reactions. Data on the prevalence and natural history of tree nut allergy are limited. Primary nut allergy typically presents with rapid-onset IgE-mediated symptoms. Diagnosis can be confirmed by demonstrating a positive skin prick test (SPT), specific IgE (sIgE), or through an oral food challenge. Component-resolved diagnostics (CRD) can identify those with a high risk of anaphylaxis. The main management strategy involves avoiding the culprit allergen and treating symptoms after accidental exposure. New therapeutic options, such as sublingual immunotherapy, oral food immunotherapy, with or without omalizumab, and other monoclonal antibodies, are being investigated to modify tree nut allergy. Tree nut allergy is a lifelong disease with a low likelihood of resolution. The aim of this paper is to present the current data on the prevalence, diagnosis, natural history, and management options for tree nut allergy. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Pediatric Nutrition)
Show Figures

Figure 1

12 pages, 273 KB  
Article
Natural History and Risk Factors of Hymenoptera Venom Allergy in Dogs
by Edwin Chapman, Erin Ashley West, Mitja Kosnik, Nina Maria Fischer, Claude Favrot, Leo Beeler and Ana Rostaher
Animals 2024, 14(22), 3220; https://doi.org/10.3390/ani14223220 - 10 Nov 2024
Viewed by 2126
Abstract
Hymenoptera, which includes honeybees, wasps, bumblebees, and hornets, is an order of the class Insecta, whose venom can induce anaphylactic reactions in dogs. While several studies have investigated the natural histories and risk factors of Hymenoptera venom allergy (HVA) in humans, only limited [...] Read more.
Hymenoptera, which includes honeybees, wasps, bumblebees, and hornets, is an order of the class Insecta, whose venom can induce anaphylactic reactions in dogs. While several studies have investigated the natural histories and risk factors of Hymenoptera venom allergy (HVA) in humans, only limited information is available on canine patients. Therefore, the aim of this study was to identify risk factors leading to severe systemic reactions (SSRs) and to explore the natural history of these patients. This was achieved with an inquiry into the case histories of 178 dogs that were stung by Hymenoptera and presented to the Vetsuisse Faculty Animal Hospital of the University of Zurich between 2018 and 2022. Dogs under two years old, dogs that weighed under 10 kg, purebred dogs, and dogs that were stung in the oral cavity were at a greater risk of developing SSRs. Almost two thirds of patients with SSRs experienced the same or worse symptoms after subsequent stings and >40% of patients with local reactions developed SSRs when stung again. Next to providing valuable clinical information about HVA in dogs, these findings strongly support the recommendation of venom immunotherapy (VIT) for patients with HVA. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Veterinary Clinical Studies)
17 pages, 2655 KB  
Article
Safety of COVID-19 Vaccines among People with History of Allergy: A European Active Surveillance Study
by Nicoletta Luxi, Francesco Ciccimarra, Chiara Bellitto, Monika Raethke, Florence van Hunsel, Thomas Lieber, Erik Mulder, Luca L’Abbate, Francisco Batel Marques, Fabiana Furci, Andreea Farcas, Janneke Giele-Eshuis, Kathryn Morton, Simona Sonderlichová, Nicolas H. Thurin, Felipe Villalobos, Fabio Riefolo, Miriam C. Sturkenboom and Gianluca Trifirò
Vaccines 2024, 12(9), 1059; https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines12091059 - 17 Sep 2024
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 6219
Abstract
Background: Conventional vaccines rarely cause severe allergic reactions. However, the rapid development and approval of COVID-19 vaccines left limited initial data on their adverse reactions, particularly in individuals with a history of allergy. The aim of this study was to assess and compare [...] Read more.
Background: Conventional vaccines rarely cause severe allergic reactions. However, the rapid development and approval of COVID-19 vaccines left limited initial data on their adverse reactions, particularly in individuals with a history of allergy. The aim of this study was to assess and compare the safety profile of different doses and brands of COVID-19 vaccines in subjects with a history of allergy vs. those without a history of allergy. Methods: From February 2021 to February 2023, a web-based prospective study gathered vaccinee-reported outcomes using electronic questionnaires across eleven European countries. Baseline and up to six follow-up questionnaires captured data on vaccinee demographics, as well as both solicited and unsolicited adverse reactions. Results: Overall, 3476 vaccinees with a history of allergy were matched with 13,872 vaccinees from the general population at the first vaccination cycle and were included in the analysis. A total of 825 vaccinees with a history of allergy who had received a booster dose, matched to 3297 vaccinees from the general population, were included in the analysis. Higher rates of ADRs occurred after the first vaccination cycle compared to after the booster dose (64–91% vs. 56–79%). However, most reported ADRs were solicited and not serious, and no case of anaphylaxis was reported. Women and vaccinees with a history of allergy reported ADRs more frequently than men and the matched controls, respectively. Compared to other COVID-19 vaccines, a higher proportion of vaccinees experiencing at least one ADR following their first vaccination cycle was observed with Comirnaty and Vaxzevria. Statistically significant differences were observed among the study cohorts for median TTO after the second dose, and for median TTR following the first vaccination cycle and booster dose (p < 0.001). Conclusions: Typically, any drug or vaccine use carries a risk of severe allergic reactions, yet the benefits of vaccination generally outweigh these potential risks, as shown with the COVID-19 vaccines. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section COVID-19 Vaccines and Vaccination)
Show Figures

Figure 1

12 pages, 3547 KB  
Article
Short-Term Active Safety Surveillance of the Spikevax and Nuvaxovid Priming Doses in Australia
by Renee Reynolds, Evelyn Tay, Michael Dymock, Lucy Deng, Catherine Glover, Laura K. Lopez, Yuanfei Anny Huang, Patrick Cashman, Alan Leeb, Julie A. Marsh, Tom Snelling, Nicholas Wood and Kristine Macartney
Vaccines 2024, 12(9), 971; https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines12090971 - 27 Aug 2024
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 9730
Abstract
Australia commenced administration of the Spikevax (Moderna mRNA-1273) COVID-19 vaccine in August 2021 and Nuvaxovid (Novavax NVX-CoV2373) in January 2022. This study describes the short-term safety profile of priming doses of the Spikevax and Nuvaxovid vaccines given between September 2021 and September 2023. [...] Read more.
Australia commenced administration of the Spikevax (Moderna mRNA-1273) COVID-19 vaccine in August 2021 and Nuvaxovid (Novavax NVX-CoV2373) in January 2022. This study describes the short-term safety profile of priming doses of the Spikevax and Nuvaxovid vaccines given between September 2021 and September 2023. Online surveys were sent via AusVaxSafety, Australia’s active vaccine safety surveillance system, three and eight days after vaccination. A total of 131,775 day 3 surveys were sent, with a response rate of 38.5% (N = 50,721). A total of 43,875 day 8 surveys matched with day 3 survey responses were sent, with a response rate of 71.5% (N = 31,355). Half (50.7%) of respondents reported any adverse event following immunisation (AEFI) in the 0–3 days after vaccination and 24.6% reported any AEFI 4–7 days after vaccination. Fatigue, local pain, headache, and myalgia were the most frequently reported symptoms for both vaccines in both periods. After adjusting for respondent characteristics, vaccination clinic type, jurisdiction, and medical conditions, the odds for reporting AEFI increased with age from 16–19 years to highest odds at 30–39 years, after which it declined. Females had greater odd of reporting AEFI than males across most age groups, vaccine types, and doses. Respondents with a history of anaphylaxis had greater odds of reporting any AEFI (adjusted OR range: 1.50–2.86). A total of 3.1% of respondents reported seeking medical review 0–3 days after vaccination. This study affirms the short-term safety of Spikevax and Nuvaxovid COVID-19 vaccine priming doses in a large sample in Australia. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Vaccine Advancement, Efficacy and Safety)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop