Search Results (36)

Background: Hereditary breast and ovarian cancer is an inherited condition caused by pathogenic (P) or likely pathogenic (LP) variants in the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes. Population-level sequencing allows for the identification of asymptomatic genotype-positive participants (GPPs) before disease onset. This study assessed the feasibility and impact of returning clinically relevant BRCA results to participants at the Qatar Precision Health Institute (QPHI). Methods: We established a structured framework to identify and refer asymptomatic individuals who were found to carry P/LP variants in BRCA among 6142 QPHI participants. The process integrated genomic analysis, participant recontact, counseling, referral, variants validation, and personalized risk-reducing strategies. Results: Six variants (four BRCA1, two BRCA2) were validated in ten GPPs with a median age of 48 years (IQR: 40.5–56). Eight variants were confirmed through Sanger sequencing in a CAP-accredited laboratory at Hamad Medical Corporation. All eligible participants were referred for counseling and personalized clinical management. Four men initiated breast and prostate cancer surveillance, while four women pursued breast and ovarian surveillance. One asymptomatic GPP underwent prophylactic salpingo-oophorectomy, revealing early-stage ovarian cancer. Cascade testing identified 20 additional GPPs and, in one asymptomatic relative, facilitated the detection of early-stage uterine cancer. The genetic testing acceptability rate was 0.77 (95% CI: 0.46–0.94), with a 100% adherence to surveillance at 12- and 24-month follow-ups. Conclusions: This pilot demonstrates the feasibility and clinical utility of returning actionable BRCA1/2 findings and represents the first initiative in an Arabic population to implement the return of medically actionable BRCA results from a population-based biobank. Full article

Hereditary predisposition substantially shapes prevention and management across urologic oncology. This narrative review synthesizes contemporary, practice-oriented guidance on whom to test, what to test, how to act on results, and how to implement care equitably for hereditary forms of prostate cancer, renal cell carcinoma (RCC), urothelial carcinoma, pheochromocytoma/paraganglioma (PPGL), and adrenocortical carcinoma (ACC). We delineate between forms of indication-driven germline testing (e.g., universal testing in metastatic prostate cancer; early-onset, bilateral/multifocal, or syndromic RCC; reflex tumor mismatch repair (MMR)/microsatellite instability (MSI) screening in upper-tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC); universal testing in PPGL; universal TP53 testing in ACC) and pair these strategies with minimum actionable gene sets and syndrome-specific surveillance frameworks. Key points include targeted prostate-specific antigen screening in BRCA2 carriers and the impact of BRCA/ATM variants on reclassification during active surveillance; major hereditary RCC syndromes with genotype-tailored surveillance and pathway-directed therapy (e.g., HIF-2α inhibition for von Hippel–Lindau disease); UTUC/bladder cancer in Lynch syndrome with tumor MMR/MSI screening, annual urinalysis (selective cytology), and immunotherapy opportunities in deficient MMR disease/MSI-H; PPGL management emphasizing universal germline testing, intensified surveillance for SDHB, cortical-sparing adrenalectomy, and emerging HIF-2α inhibition; and ACC care modified by Li–Fraumeni syndrome (minimization of radiation/genotoxic therapy with whole-body imaging surveillance). Testicular germ cell tumor remains largely polygenic, with no routine germline testing in typical presentations. Finally, we provide pre-/post-test genetic-counseling checklists and mainstreamed workflows with equity metrics to operationalize precision care and close real-world access gaps. Full article

Pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (pNENs) are the second most common type of pancreatic cancer after pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Germline mutations in DNA repair genes drive several hereditary and sporadic cancers; however, their role in pNENs remains poorly defined. This pilot study aimed to assess the frequency and clinical relevance of germline DNA repair gene mutations in patients with pNENs, both with and without a family history of cancer. Germline DNA from 57 Polish patients with pNENs was analyzed using targeted next-generation sequencing to identify variants in a panel of DNA repair genes. Variant classification followed the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics/Association for Molecular Pathology guidelines. Germline mutations were identified in 14 patients (24.6%), both with and without a family history of malignancy. Two patients carried pathogenic variants in BRCA2 and CHEK2, while seven carried variants of uncertain significance (VUS). The identified variants have been implicated in various cancer types, including breast, ovarian, prostate, gastric, colorectal, and pancreatic cancers. These findings indicate that germline mutations in DNA repair genes may contribute to the pathogenesis of pNENs, even in patients without a family history. Broader germline testing and population-specific studies are needed to clarify the genetic landscape and clinical implications of these alterations. Full article

Hereditary breast and ovarian cancer (HBOC) syndrome is primarily associated with mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2, but increasing evidence links it to other malignancies, including male breast, prostate, and pancreatic cancers. Advances in genetic testing have led to the use of multigene panels, revealing that additional genes contribute to HBOC risk. We tested 280 patients with suspected HBOC using a multigene panel including BRCA1, BRCA2, and other genes involved in homologous recombination (HR) and additional DNA repair mechanisms. Variants were classified as pathogenic variants (PVs), variants of uncertain significance (VUS), or novel. In silico tools were used to predict the clinical relevance of VUS and novel variants. The clinical phenotype of families carrying a PV was evaluated. PVs were identified in 19.3% of patients: 8.9% in BRCA1/2 and 10.4% in other genes, mainly CHEK2, ATM, PALB2, and BRIP1. An additional 1.8% of cases harbored likely pathogenic VUS or novel variants according to bioinformatic prediction. Breast and ovarian cancer were the most frequent malignancies in our population, both in the BRCA group and in those with PVs in other susceptibility genes. Broad genetic testing beyond BRCA improves HBOC diagnostics, supports identification of at-risk families, and enables more personalized surveillance and treatment. Full article

Background: Prostate cancer (PC) is one of the most common oncological diseases among men. Up to 20% of PC cases are associated with hereditary risks or syndromes. The impact of common variants, particularly EHBP1 c.1185+30064G>A rs721048, on developing PC and other malignancies remains unclear. There are also no data on the frequency of this variant in the Kazakh population or its association with PC, nor its potential connection with other malignancies, particularly colorectal cancer (CRC). Methods: We utilized the TruSight Cancer Sequencing Panel to assess pathological genomic variants in 72 male patients with histologically verified aggressive PC and 119 patients of Kazakh nationality with histologically confirmed CRC compared to the control group. Results: A variant in the intron of the EHBP1 gene c.1185+30064G>A rs721048 was identified in 18 patients (25%) out of 72 with PC, while in the control group of 41 healthy males, the rs721048 variant was found in only 4 (9.8%) individuals. In the CRC group, rs721048 was detected in 17 cases (14.2%) and eight control individuals (10%). Conclusions: The frequency of the EHBP1 c.1185+30064G>A rs721048 variant in the PC group was significantly higher (p < 0.05) than in healthy males of Kazakh nationality. Identifying EHBP1 c.1185+30064G>A among the male population of Kazakhstan will help form the high-risk groups for PC to prevent the development of malignant neoplasms. The presence of rs721048 was not significantly associated with the risk of developing CRC in our study. Full article

Background: Identifying patients with gBRCAm is crucial to facilitate screening strategies, preventive measures and the usage of targeted therapeutics in their management. This review examines the evidence for the latest predictive and therapeutic approaches in BRCA-associated cancers. Clinical Description: Data supports the use of adjuvant olaparib in patients with gBRCAm high-risk HER2-negative breast cancer. In advanced gBRCAm HER2-negative breast cancer, the PARPis talazoparib and olaparib have demonstrated benefit over standard chemotherapy. In ovarian cancer, olaparib, niraparib or rucaparib can be used as monotherapy in frontline maintenance. Olaparib and bevacizumab as a combination can also be used as frontline maintenance. In the relapsed platinum-sensitive setting, olaparib, niraparib and rucaparib are effective maintenance options in BRCAm patients who are PARPi naive. Both olaparib and rucaparib are effective options in BRCAm metastatic castrate-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). Evidence also exists for the benefit of PARPi combinations in mCRPC. In metastatic pancreatic cancer, olaparib can be used in gBRCAm patients who are responding to platinum chemotherapy. However, there may be a development of PARPi resistance. Understanding the pathophysiology that contributes to such resistance may allow the development of novel therapeutics. Combination therapy appears to have promising results in emerging trials. Seeking avenues for subsidised genetic testing can reduce the total costs of cancer management, leading to improve detection rates. Conclusion: Identifying breast, ovarian, pancreatic and prostate cancer patients with gBRCAm plays a crucial predictive role in selecting those who will benefit significantly from PARPi therapy. The use of PARPi in gBRCAm HBOC-related cancers has resulted in significant survival benefits. Beyond BRCA1/2, HRR gene assessment and the consideration of other cancer predisposition syndromes may allow more patients to be eligible for and benefit from targeted therapies. Full article

The lifetime risk of breast and ovarian cancer increases substantially for individuals with mutations in BRCA1/2. The evidence indicates that BRCA1/2 mutation carriers benefit from early cancer detection and prevention strategies. However, data on the patterns of risk-reducing interventions are lacking. This study investigated the patterns of surveillance and risk-reducing interventions among unaffected BRCA1/2 mutation carriers. A cohort of unaffected BRCA1/2 mutation carriers was identified from the Korean Hereditary Breast cAncer (KOHBRA) study database, and a telephone survey was conducted. The survey included questions on the incidence of new cancers, patterns of cancer (breast, ovarian, prostate, other) surveillance, chemoprevention, risk-reducing surgery, and reasons for participating in risk-reducing strategies. Between November 2016 and November 2020, 192 BRCA1/2 mutation carriers were contacted, of which 83 responded. After excluding 37 responders who refused to participate, 46 participants (15 males, 31 females) were included in the analysis. The mean ± SD follow-up time was 103 ± 17 months (median 107, range 68~154), and the mean ± SD age was 31 ± 8 years. Ten BRCA1/2 mutation carriers developed breast cancer, one developed ovarian cancer, and three developed other cancers. Six BRCA1/2 mutation carriers (19.4%) underwent annual breast cancer surveillance as recommended by guidelines, while none underwent ovarian or prostate cancer surveillance. Three carriers (9.7%) used chemoprevention for breast cancer. Risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy was performed on only one BRCA1/2 mutation carrier. The rates of breast/ovarian cancer surveillance, chemoprevention, and risk-reducing surgery were low among unaffected Korean BRCA1/2 mutation carriers. Given this cohort’s relatively high risk of developing breast cancer, strategies to encourage active participation in risk reduction are needed. Full article

Rare, inherited variants in DNA damage repair (DDR) genes have a recognised role in prostate cancer (PrCa) susceptibility. In addition, these genes are therapeutically targetable. While rare variants are informing clinical management in other common cancers, defining the rare disease-associated variants in PrCa has been challenging. Here, whole-genome and -exome sequencing data from two independent, high-risk Australian and North American familial PrCa datasets were interrogated for novel DDR risk variants. Rare DDR gene variants (predicted to be damaging and present in two or more family members) were identified and subsequently genotyped in 1963 individuals (700 familial and 459 sporadic PrCa cases, 482 unaffected relatives, and 322 screened controls), and association analyses accounting for relatedness (M_QLS) undertaken. In the combined datasets, rare ERCC3 (rs145201970, p = 2.57 × 10⁻⁴) and BRIP1 (rs4988345, p = 0.025) variants were significantly associated with PrCa risk. A PARP2 (rs200603922, p = 0.028) variant in the Australian dataset and a MUTYH (rs36053993, p = 0.031) variant in the North American dataset were also associated with risk. Evaluation of clinicopathological characteristics provided no evidence for a younger age or higher-grade disease at diagnosis in variant carriers, which should be taken into consideration when determining genetic screening eligibility criteria for targeted, gene-based treatments in the future. This study adds valuable knowledge to our understanding of PrCa-associated DDR genes, which will underpin effective clinical screening and treatment strategies. Full article

Hereditary cancer syndromes caused by germline mutations account for 5–10% of all cancers. The finding of a genetic mutation could have far-reaching consequences for pharmaceutical therapy, personalized prevention strategies, and cascade testing. According to the National Comprehensive Cancer Network’s (NCCN) and the Italian Association of Medical Oncology (AIOM) guidelines, unaffected family members should be tested only if the affected one is unavailable. This article explores whether germline genetic testing may be offered to high-risk families for hereditary cancer even if a living affected relative is missing. A retrospective study was carried out on 103 healthy subjects tested from 2017 to 2023. We enrolled all subjects with at least two first- or second-degree relatives affected by breast, ovarian, pancreatic, gastric, prostate, or colorectal cancer. All subjects were tested by Next Generation Sequencing (NGS) multi-gene panel of 27 cancer-associated genes. In the study population, 5 (about 5%) pathogenic/likely pathogenic variants (PVs/LPVs) were found, while 40 (42%) had a Variant of Uncertain Significance (VUS). This study highlights the importance of genetic testing for individuals with a strong family history of hereditary malignancies. This approach would allow women who tested positive to receive tailored treatment and prevention strategies based on their personal mutation status. Full article

Background: Prostate cancer is a malignant neoplasm of the male genitourinary system with the highest incidence worldwide. Susceptibility genes related to aggressiveness and prognosis, such as BRCA1/2, ATM, PTEN, have been identified. Currently, reports related to germline mutations in patients with prostate cancer in Latin American populations are very limited or absent. In the Mexican population, reports are also limited, especially in the context of metastatic prostate cancer. Determining the prevalence of these mutations is relevant to predict the potential aggressiveness of tumors and allow the use of targeted therapies, such as PARPi inhibitors. Objective: Determine the prevalence of germline mutations in patients with metastatic prostate cancer and establish their clinical characteristics at diagnosis. Material and Methods: Sixty-nine patients with metastatic PCa underwent testing and genetic analysis using the Comprehensive Multi-Cancer Hereditary Cancer Panel. The prevalence of germline mutations was assessed, and the cohort was divided into two groups for the evaluation and analysis of clinical characteristics between the mutated and non-mutated populations. Results: We identified mutations in 15 out of 69 patients (21.73%), while 54 patients (78.26%) had no mutations. Pathogenic mutations were observed in 15.9% of patients, Variants of Uncertain Significance (VUS) in 34.78%, and 5.79% had both. The most frequent mutations included ATM (11.54%), BRCA1 (11.54%), BRCA2 (7.69%), FANCA (7.69%), and FANCM (7.69%). No statistically significant differences were found in PSA levels, age at diagnosis, and resistance to castration between the two groups. Conclusions: Our study unveiled a mutation rate of 21.73%, marked by a significant prevalence of ATM, FANCA, FANCM, and Variants of Uncertain Significance (VUS). This pattern deviates from findings in other series, underscoring the necessity for improved access to clinical genetic testing in our population. Full article

(1) Background: Somatic and germline alterations can be commonly found in prostate cancer (PCa) patients. The aim of our present study was to perform a comprehensive review of the current literature in order to examine the impact of BRCA mutations in the context of PCa as well as their significance as genetic biomarkers. (2) Methods: A narrative review of all the available literature was performed. Only “landmark” publications were included. (3) Results: Overall, the number of PCa patients who harbor a BRCA2 mutation range between 1.2% and 3.2%. However, BRCA2 and BRCA1 mutations are responsible for most cases of hereditary PCa, increasing the risk by 3–8.6 times and up to 4 times, respectively. These mutations are correlated with aggressive disease and poor prognosis. Gene testing should be offered to patients with metastatic PCa, those with 2–3 first-degree relatives with PCa, or those aged < 55 and with one close relative with breast (age ≤ 50 years) or invasive ovarian cancer. (4) Conclusions: The individualized assessment of BRCA mutations is an important tool for the risk stratification of PCa patients. It is also a population screening tool which can guide our risk assessment strategies and achieve better results for our patients and their families. Full article

Prostate cancer (PCa) has a distinct molecular signature, including characteristic chromosomal translocations, gene deletions and defective DNA damage repair mechanisms. One crucial pathway involved is homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) and it is found in almost 20% of metastatic castrate-resistant PCa (mCRPC). Inherited/germline mutations are associated with a hereditary predisposition to early PCa development and aggressive behavior. BRCA2, ATM and CHECK2 are the most frequently HRD-mutated genes. BRCA2-mutated tumors have unfavorable clinical and pathological characteristics, such as intraductal carcinoma. PARP inhibitors, due to the induction of synthetic lethality, have been therapeutically approved for mCRPC with HRD alterations. Mutations are detected in metastatic tissue, while a liquid biopsy is utilized during follow-up, recognizing acquired resistance mechanisms. The mismatch repair (MMR) pathway is another DNA repair mechanism implicated in carcinogenesis, although only 5% of metastatic PCa is affected. It is associated with aggressive disease. PD-1 inhibitors have been used in MMR-deficient tumors; thus, the MMR status should be tested in all metastatic PCa cases. A surrogate marker of defective DNA repair mechanisms is the tumor mutational burden. PDL-1 expression and intratumoral lymphocytes have ambivalent predictive value. Few experimental molecules have been so far proposed as potential biomarkers. Future research may further elucidate the role of DNA damage pathways in PCa, revealing new therapeutic targets and predictive biomarkers. Full article

Cancers are worldwide health concerns, whether they are sporadic or hereditary. The fundamental mechanism that causes somatic or oncogenic mutations and ultimately aids cancer development is still unknown. However, mammalian cells with protein-only somatic inheritance may also contribute to cancerous malignancies. Emerging data from a recent study show that prion-like proteins and prions (PrP^C) are crucial entities that have a functional role in developing neurological disorders and cancer. Furthermore, excessive PrP^C expression profiling has also been detected in non-neuronal tissues, such as the lymphoid cells, kidney, GIT, lung, muscle, and mammary glands. PrP^C expression is strongly linked with the proliferation and metastasis of pancreatic, prostate, colorectal, and breast malignancies. Similarly, experimental investigation presented that the PrP^C expression, including the prion protein-coding gene (PRNP) and p53 ag are directly associated with tumorigenicity and metastasis (tumor suppressor gene). The ERK2 (extracellular signal-regulated kinase) pathway also confers a robust metastatic capability for PrP^C-induced epithelial to mesenchymal transition. Additionally, prions could alter the epigenetic regulation of genes and overactive the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) signaling pathway, which promotes the development of cancer in humans. Protein overexpression or suppression caused by a prion and prion-like proteins has also been linked to oncogenesis and metastasis. Meanwhile, additional studies have discovered resistance to therapeutic targets, highlighting the significance of protein expression levels as potential diagnostic indicators and therapeutic targets. Full article

Repair of a DNA double-strand break relies upon a pathway of proteins to identify damage, regulate cell cycle checkpoints, and repair the damage. This process is initiated by a sensor protein complex, the MRN complex, comprised of three proteins-MRE11, RAD50, and NBS1. After a double-stranded break, the MRN complex recruits and activates ATM, in-turn activating other proteins such as BRCA1/2, ATR, CHEK1/2, PALB2 and RAD51. These proteins have been the focus of many studies for their individual roles in hereditary cancer syndromes and are included on several genetic testing panels. These panels have enabled us to acquire large amounts of genetic data, much of which remains a challenge to interpret due to the presence of variants of uncertain significance (VUS). While the primary aim of clinical testing is to accurately and confidently classify variants in order to inform medical management, the presence of VUSs has led to ambiguity in genetic counseling. Pathogenic variants within MRN complex genes have been implicated in breast, ovarian, prostate, colon cancers and gliomas; however, the hundreds of VUSs within MRE11, RAD50, and NBS1 precludes the application of these data in genetic guidance of carriers. In this review, we discuss the MRN complex’s role in DNA double-strand break repair, its interactions with other cancer predisposing genes, the variants that can be found within the three MRN complex genes, and the MRN complex’s potential as an anti-cancer therapeutic target. Full article

Germline pathogenic variants in the Breast Cancer Genes 1 (BRCA1) and 2 (BRCA2) are responsible for Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer (HBOC) syndrome. Genetic susceptibility to breast cancer accounts for 5–10% of all cases, phenotypically presenting with characteristics such as an autosomal dominant inheritance pattern, earlier age of onset, bilateral tumours, male breast cancer, and ovarian tumours, among others. BRCA2 pathogenic variant is usually associated with other cancers such as melanoma, prostate, and pancreatic cancers. Many rearrangements of different mutations were found in both genes, with some ethnic groups having higher frequencies of specific mutations due to founder effects. Despite the heterogeneity of germline BRCA1/BRCA2 mutations in Portuguese breast or/and ovarian cancer families, the first described founder mutation in the BRCA2 gene (c.156_157insAlu) and two other variants in the BRCA1 gene (c.3331_3334del and c.2037delinsCC) contribute to about 50% of all pathogenic mutations. Furthermore, the families with the BRCA1 c.3331_3334del or the c.2037delinsCC mutations share a common haplotype, suggesting that these may also be founder mutations in the Portuguese population. Identifying specific and recurrent/founder mutations plays an important role in increasing the efficiency of genetic testing since it allows the use of more specific, cheaper and faster strategies to screen HBOC families. Therefore, this review aims to describe the mutational rearrangements of founder mutations and evaluate their impact on the genetic testing criteria for HBOC families of Portuguese ancestry. Full article