Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (14)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = guided bone regeneration horizontal ridge augmentation

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
21 pages, 329 KB  
Review
Cortical Laminar Bone Membrane in Implant Dentistry: Biological Basis, Clinical Protocols, and Outcomes
by Alessandro Pinto, Vincenzo Mazzetti, Paolo Carosi and Claudia Lorenzi
Appl. Sci. 2025, 15(22), 12243; https://doi.org/10.3390/app152212243 - 18 Nov 2025
Viewed by 562
Abstract
Cortical laminar bone membranes (CLBMs) combine mechanical strength with controlled resorption to overcome the limitations of conventional guided bone regeneration membranes. This narrative review synthesizes the clinical efficacy and comparative outcomes of CLBMs from human studies. A systematic literature search identified 13 human [...] Read more.
Cortical laminar bone membranes (CLBMs) combine mechanical strength with controlled resorption to overcome the limitations of conventional guided bone regeneration membranes. This narrative review synthesizes the clinical efficacy and comparative outcomes of CLBMs from human studies. A systematic literature search identified 13 human clinical studies evaluating CLBMs from xenogeneic (porcine, equine, bovine) and autogenous sources. Compared to conventional alternatives, CLBMs demonstrated superior outcomes: horizontal ridge augmentation achieved 3.1–5.8 mm gains with CLBMs versus 2.0–3.0 mm with collagen membranes (50–100% improvement); membrane exposure rates were 3–8% (CLBMs) versus 15–30% (titanium mesh); and socket preservation achieved a 72% resorption reduction versus natural healing controls. Vertical augmentation achieved 7–11 mm gains. Maxillary sinus augmentation achieved a 100% implant success (1–5 year follow-up). The overall implant survival rates ranged 90.9–100% with CLBMs, exceeding the reported success rates (85–95%) of conventional GBR approaches, with complication rates of 0–12.5%. A histomorphometric analysis demonstrated new bone formation of 29.7–40% at 6 months, with a residual biomaterial of 26.2–35%. CLBMs demonstrate favorable exposure rates and excellent biocompatibility. These membranes support lateral, vertical, and combined defect reconstruction, with reduced donor-site morbidity compared to autogenous approaches. High-quality comparative trials and extended follow-up studies are needed to establish definitive clinical guidelines. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Applied Dentistry and Oral Sciences)
14 pages, 4648 KB  
Article
The Use of Vacuum Plasma Surface Treatment to Improve Bone Healing and Regeneration in Socket Preservation and GBR: A Case Series with Histological Analysis
by Marco Tallarico, Michele Troia, Milena Pisano, Silvio Mario Meloni, Dario Melodia, Claudia Della Via, Dolaji Henin, Francesco Mattia Ceruso, Carlotta Cacciò and Aurea Immacolata Lumbau
Appl. Sci. 2025, 15(11), 6344; https://doi.org/10.3390/app15116344 - 5 Jun 2025
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 858
Abstract
Purpose: To evaluate the clinical and histological outcomes of patients that receive implant-supported crowns after vacuum plasma surface treatment (VPST) of biomaterials used in socket preservation (SP) and guided bone regeneration (GBR). Materials and methods: This study was designed as a case series. [...] Read more.
Purpose: To evaluate the clinical and histological outcomes of patients that receive implant-supported crowns after vacuum plasma surface treatment (VPST) of biomaterials used in socket preservation (SP) and guided bone regeneration (GBR). Materials and methods: This study was designed as a case series. Patients in need of tooth extraction and socket preservation or guided bone regeneration were enrolled. The socket preservation technique was performed after tooth extraction using a heterologous collagen bone graft and a collagen xenomatrix, both activated with vacuum plasma. Meanwhile, a two-stage horizontal ridge augmentation was performed using a customized titanium mesh and a mix of autologous (untreated) and heterologous (treated) bone grafts, along with a treated collagen membrane. ACTILINK Reborn with Universal Vortex Holder (Plasmapp Co., Ltd., Daejeon, Republic of Korea) was used to treat all biomaterials. The outcome measures were implant and prosthesis failures, complications, and histological examination. Soft and hard tissue samples were collected at the time of implant placement only in patients treated with SP. Results: A total of six patients were treated—three with socket preservation and delayed implant placement, and three with staged GBR. No implant or prosthesis failed. One customized titanium mesh broke after plasma treatment, requiring replacement with a pericardium membrane. No other complications occurred. Histological analysis at three months post-surgery revealed well-vascularized newly formed bone at different stages of maturation with integrated bone graft particles, while the soft tissue appeared to be physiologically structured. Conclusion: VPST may enhance the hydrophilicity of biomaterials, supporting favorable healing outcomes in SP and GBR. Further randomized controlled trials with appropriate sample size calculations are needed to confirm these preliminary results. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Current Advances in Dental Materials)
Show Figures

Figure 1

16 pages, 13344 KB  
Article
Fibrinogen-Induced Regeneration Sealing Technique (F.I.R.S.T.): A Retrospective Clinical Study on 105 Implants with a 3–7-Year Follow-Up
by Márton Kivovics, Vincenzo Foti, Yaniv Mayer and Eitan Mijiritsky
J. Clin. Med. 2024, 13(22), 6916; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13226916 - 17 Nov 2024
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 3312
Abstract
Background/Objectives: The primary aim of this retrospective clinical study was to assess the success and bone gain achieved by using the Fibrinogen-Induced Regeneration Sealing Technique (F.I.R.S.T.) in different indications. Methods: In this single-center retrospective clinical study, F.I.R.S.T. was performed in the following indications: [...] Read more.
Background/Objectives: The primary aim of this retrospective clinical study was to assess the success and bone gain achieved by using the Fibrinogen-Induced Regeneration Sealing Technique (F.I.R.S.T.) in different indications. Methods: In this single-center retrospective clinical study, F.I.R.S.T. was performed in the following indications: alveolar ridge preservation (ARP), immediate implant placement, and horizontal and vertical guided bone regeneration (GBR) with simultaneous dental implant placement. F.I.R.S.T. is a modified approach to GBR characterized by the application of a porcine cortical lamina, as a long-term resorbable bone barrier to cover the bone defect, and a fibrin sealant for easy adaptation of the xenogenic bone graft material and the fixation of the collagenic bone barrier. Patients with uncontrolled systemic diseases, medications, or diseases that may alter bone metabolism; local inflammation; poor oral hygiene; and heavy smoking were excluded from this study. Horizontal and vertical bone gain (HBG and VBG) were measured by comparing postoperative and preoperative cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) reconstructions. Patients were recalled for controls and oral hygiene treatment every 6 months. Results: Altogether, 62 patients (27 male, 35 female, age 63.73 ± 12.95 years) were included in this study, and 105 implants were placed. Six implants failed during the 50.67 ± 22.18-month-long follow-up. Cumulative implant survival throughout the groups was 94.29 %. In the immediate implant group, HBG was 0.86 mm (range: −0.75–8.19 mm) at the 2 mm subcrestal level, while VBG was 0.87 ± 1.21 mm. In the ARP group, HBG was 0.51 mm (range: −0.29–3.90 mm) at the 2 mm subcrestal level, while VBG was −0.16 mm (range: −0.52–0.92 mm). In the horizontal GBR group, HBG was 2.91 mm (range: 1.24–8.10 mm) at the 2 mm subcrestal level. In the vertical GBR group, VBG was 4.15 mm (range: 3.00–10.41 mm). Conclusions: F.I.R.S.T. can be utilized successfully for bone augmentation. The vertical and horizontal bone gains achieved through F.I.R.S.T. allow for implant placement with adequate bone width on both the vestibular and oral aspects of the implant. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Dental Implant Surgery: Clinical Updates and Perspectives)
Show Figures

Figure 1

7 pages, 2124 KB  
Case Report
Regeneration of Horizontal Bone Defect in Edentulous Maxilla Using the Allogenic Bone-Plate Shell Technique and a Composite Bone Graft—A Case Report
by Zoran Kovac, Tomislav Cabov, Marko Blaskovic and Luka Morelato
Medicina 2023, 59(3), 494; https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina59030494 - 2 Mar 2023
Cited by 6 | Viewed by 4452
Abstract
An insufficient volume of the alveolar bone may prevent implants from being placed in the prosthetically optimal position. Complex restoration of bony structures is required to achieve long-term peri-implant bone stability and represents an adequate prosthetic solution. Background and Objectives: The shell [...] Read more.
An insufficient volume of the alveolar bone may prevent implants from being placed in the prosthetically optimal position. Complex restoration of bony structures is required to achieve long-term peri-implant bone stability and represents an adequate prosthetic solution. Background and Objectives: The shell technique has become a widespread and important method for guided bone regeneration in dentistry. Allogeneic bone materials appear to be the most similar substitution for autogenous bone transplants. However, there are few studies using cortical bone allografts in combination with a mix of autogenous and xenograft materials for the augmentation of horizontal ridge defects. This combination offers the advantage of reduced patient morbidity while adding adequate volume and contour to the alveolar ridge. Case report: The present case study aimed to clinically and radiographically evaluate the efficacy of allogenic cortical bone lamina combined with a composite bone graft in the augmentation of a horizontal bone defect in the edentulous maxilla during a 6-year follow-up period. Three CB CT scans taken before treatment, 6 months after the augmentation period/before implant placement, and after a 6-year follow-up period, were analyzed using stable referent points. After the 6 -year follow-up period, the average resorption rate was 21.65% on the augmented buccal side, with no implant exposure being observed. Conclusions: The bone shell technique used in conjunction with allogenic bone plates combined with autogenous bone, xenografts, and collagen membranes is an effective technique to manage horizontal ridge defects. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Oral Surgery and Implant Dentistry)
Show Figures

Figure 1

17 pages, 4223 KB  
Communication
The Significance of Mylohyoid Muscle Release (MMR) in the Vertical and Horizontal Ridge Augmentation Surgeries; Clinical and Human Cadaver Analyses of the Techniques
by Nikolaos Soldatos, Jessica Immonen, Georgios Romanos and Robin Weltman
Genes 2023, 14(3), 595; https://doi.org/10.3390/genes14030595 - 26 Feb 2023
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 3455
Abstract
(1) Background: Ridge augmentations either horizontal (HRA) or vertical (VRA) in the posterior mandible are very challenging regenerative procedures. To attain and retain tension-free primary closure, buccal periosteal and mylohyoid muscle releases should be performed. The purpose of the present study was to [...] Read more.
(1) Background: Ridge augmentations either horizontal (HRA) or vertical (VRA) in the posterior mandible are very challenging regenerative procedures. To attain and retain tension-free primary closure, buccal periosteal and mylohyoid muscle releases should be performed. The purpose of the present study was to review, analyze and discuss the three different techniques for the mylohyoid muscle release (MMR) in VRA and HRA surgeries on a clinical and human cadaver level. (2) Presentation of the techniques: Three different techniques are described in the literature regarding the lingual flap management: (i) the finger sweep technique (FST), (ii) the release of the mylohyoid muscle attachment on the lingual flap (MMALF), and (iii) the mylohyoid preservation technique (MPT) in three key anatomical zones. All three techniques, even though they use a different approach, can achieve similar amount of horizontal and vertical mylohyoid muscle release although MPT showed statistically significant higher flap advancement. The human cadaver analyses revealed that all three techniques are considered safe since they do not approximate vital anatomical structures. (3) Conclusions: All three techniques are considered safe, but they are not free of limitations or complications; therefore, they should be performed only by highly experienced and trained clinicians. MPT achieved statistically significant higher flap advancement. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

10 pages, 12544 KB  
Case Report
Restoration of Severe Bone and Soft Tissue Atrophy by Means of a Xenogenic Bone Sheet (Flex Cortical Sheet): A Case Report
by Roberto Rossi, Lucia Memè, Enrico M. Strappa and Fabrizio Bambini
Appl. Sci. 2023, 13(2), 692; https://doi.org/10.3390/app13020692 - 4 Jan 2023
Cited by 19 | Viewed by 2977
Abstract
The use of xenogenic cortical bone laminas in Guided Bone Regeneration (GBR) has been well described in the literature over the past decade. These biomaterials present a very low degree of complications due to their nature (porcine or equine collagenated bone) and the [...] Read more.
The use of xenogenic cortical bone laminas in Guided Bone Regeneration (GBR) has been well described in the literature over the past decade. These biomaterials present a very low degree of complications due to their nature (porcine or equine collagenated bone) and the fact that when they become exposed, they simply hydrolyze without major complications. One of the problems related to the first generation of these laminas was their extreme rigidity and return elasticity, often forcing clinicians to anchor them with pins and/or screws. A new generation of bone laminas called Flex Cortical Sheet (FCS) have recently been introduced with machine-made thicknesses of 0.2, 0.5, and 0.9 mm and increased flexibility and adaptability to ridge defects. This paper has the goal of presenting a case of vertical and horizontal reconstruction performed by means of a 0.5 mm FCS and showing the workflow necessary to successfully restore a complex situation. After 8 months of healing, the GBR resulted in a horizontal and vertical augmentation of 8 mm and 8 mm, respectively. The radiographic examination at 18 months demonstrated great stability of new bone around implants. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue New Advances in Clinical Dentistry)
Show Figures

Figure 1

10 pages, 1444 KB  
Article
CBCT Evaluation of Sticky Bone in Horizontal Ridge Augmentation with and without Collagen Membrane—A Randomized Parallel Arm Clinical Trial
by Jane Belinda Tony, Harinath Parthasarathy, Anupama Tadepalli, Deepa Ponnaiyan, Ahmed Alamoudi, Mona Awad Kamil, Khalid J. Alzahrani, Khalaf F. Alsharif, Ibrahim F. Halawani, Mrim M. Alnfiai, Lakshmi Ramachandran, Thodur Madapusi Balaji and Shankargouda Patil
J. Funct. Biomater. 2022, 13(4), 194; https://doi.org/10.3390/jfb13040194 - 19 Oct 2022
Cited by 19 | Viewed by 5682
Abstract
Guided bone regeneration (GBR) is a reliable technique used to treat ridge deficiencies prior or during implant placement. Injectable-platelet rich fibrin (i-PRF) laced with a bone substitute (sticky bone) has heralded the way for advancing the outcomes of bone regeneration. This study evaluated [...] Read more.
Guided bone regeneration (GBR) is a reliable technique used to treat ridge deficiencies prior or during implant placement. Injectable-platelet rich fibrin (i-PRF) laced with a bone substitute (sticky bone) has heralded the way for advancing the outcomes of bone regeneration. This study evaluated the efficacy of sticky bone in horizontal ridge augmentation with and without collagen membrane. A total of 20 partially edentulous patients (Group-I n = 10; Group-II n = 10) that indicated GBR were included, and the surgical procedure was carried out. In Group-I, the sticky bone and collagen membrane were placed in ridge-deficient sites and Group-II received only sticky bone. At the end of 6 months, 20 patients (Group-I (n = 10); Group-II (n = 10)) completed the follow-up period. A CBCT examination was performed to assess changes in the horizontal ridge width (HRW) and vertical bone height (VBH). A statistically significant increase in HRW (p < 0.05) was observed in both groups with mean gains of 1.35 mm, 1.55 mm, and 1.93 mm at three levels (crest, 3 mm, and 6 mm) in Group-I and 2.7 mm, 2.8 mm, and 2.6 mm at three levels in Group-II. The intergroup comparison revealed statistical significance (p < 0.05) with respect to HRW and KTW (Keratinised tissue width) gains of 0.775 at the 6-month follow-up. Sticky-bone (Xenogenic-bone graft + i-PRF) served as a promising biomaterial in achieving better horizontal bone width gain. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Biomaterials and Bioengineering in Dentistry)
Show Figures

Figure 1

11 pages, 2576 KB  
Article
Comparison of Allogeneic Bone Plate and Guided Bone Regeneration Efficiency in Horizontally Deficient Maxillary Alveolar Ridges
by Ihsan Caglar Cinar, Bahattin Alper Gultekin, Alper Saglanmak, Ayse Sumeyye Akay, Mohammed Zboun and Eitan Mijiritsky
Appl. Sci. 2022, 12(20), 10518; https://doi.org/10.3390/app122010518 - 18 Oct 2022
Cited by 5 | Viewed by 5610
Abstract
(1) Background: Bone Lamina Technique and Guided Bone Regeneration (GBR) are commonly used for horizontally-deficient maxillary ridge reconstruction, although more detailed evaluation to assess the differences between such techniques is necessitated. (2) Methods: In this retrospective study, patients having a horizontal bone width [...] Read more.
(1) Background: Bone Lamina Technique and Guided Bone Regeneration (GBR) are commonly used for horizontally-deficient maxillary ridge reconstruction, although more detailed evaluation to assess the differences between such techniques is necessitated. (2) Methods: In this retrospective study, patients having a horizontal bone width of ≤4 mm in the maxilla, who were treated with Cortical Strut (CS), were collected to represent the “test group”, and those treated with GBR with no CS involvement represented the “control group”. A 1:1 mixture of autogenous bone (AB) and anorganic bovine bone (ABB) with resorbable collagen membrane was applied to both groups. Volumetric changes between groups were measured with cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT). The primary outcome represented volumetric graft resorption rate whilst the secondary outcomes represented any probable complications and implant insertion torque. (3) Results: A total of 36 patients were included in this study (36 grafted sites; 18 for CS group and 18 for GBR group). Mean bone graft volume reduction in the CS and GBR groups was 8.26 ± 1.60% and 14.36 ± 3.55%, respectively. The GBR group showed significantly more bone resorption than the CS group (p < 0.001). Complications and insertion torque were similar between the groups (p > 0.05). (4) Conclusions: Both CS and GBR techniques for hard-tissue augmentation provided sufficient bone graft mass volume for implant insertion, whereas CS demonstrated lower resorption rate at maxillary augmented sites, compared to GBR. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Current Advances in Dentistry)
Show Figures

Figure 1

10 pages, 6925 KB  
Article
Customized Titanium Mesh for Guided Bone Regeneration with Autologous Bone and Xenograft
by Anna Bertran Faus, José Cordero Bayo, Eugenio Velasco-Ortega, Aina Torrejon-Moya, Francesca Fernández-Velilla, Fernando García and José López-López
Materials 2022, 15(18), 6271; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15186271 - 9 Sep 2022
Cited by 16 | Viewed by 4582
Abstract
The augmentation of the alveolar crest after the loss of one or several teeth can be carried out using different bone augmentation techniques. These techniques include bone distraction, ridge expansion, bone block grafts, etc. Guided bone regeneration is an alternative to increase the [...] Read more.
The augmentation of the alveolar crest after the loss of one or several teeth can be carried out using different bone augmentation techniques. These techniques include bone distraction, ridge expansion, bone block grafts, etc. Guided bone regeneration is an alternative to increase the volume of the hard tissues for the subsequent placement of the implants in the optimal three-dimensional position. The objective of this paper is to show a case report of the use of customized titanium mesh for posterior vertical bone regeneration. Case report and Results: A 59-year-old woman comes to rehabilitate edentulous spaces with implants. After taking the anamnesis and the intra and extraoral exploration, a vertical and horizontal bone defect is observed in the third quadrant. After the radiological study with CBCT, a bone height of 6.04 mm to the inferior alveolar nerve and a width of the bone crest of 3.95 mm was observed. It was decided to carry out a regeneration with a preformed titanium mesh (Avinent®, Santpedor, Spain) and four microscrews (Avinent®, Santpedor, Spain). The flap was closed without tension. Regular check-ups were performed without complications. At 7 months, the mesh was removed and two osteoingrated implants (Avinent®, Santpedor, Spain) were placed with a torque greater than 45 N/cm and an ISQ of 82 and 57 N/cm, respectively. The bone gain obtained was 1.84 and 1.92 mm in width and 4.2 and 3.78 mm in height for positions 3.5 and 3.6. The newly formed bone, obtained by trephine, was well-structured and histologically indistinguishable from the previous bone. Conclusion: The use of a customized pre-formed titanium mesh together with the mixture of autologous bone and xenograft is a feasible and predictable technique for vertical bone regeneration. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

13 pages, 3624 KB  
Article
Custom Bone Regeneration (CBR): An Alternative Method of Bone Augmentation—A Case Series Study
by Daniele De Santis, Luciano Umberto, Donadello Dario, Faccioni Paolo, Morris Zarantonello, Cristian Alberti, Giuseppe Verlato and Federico Gelpi
J. Clin. Med. 2022, 11(16), 4739; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11164739 - 13 Aug 2022
Cited by 18 | Viewed by 3757
Abstract
We performed this clinical study in order to evaluate the reliability of the Guided Bone Regeneration (GBR) surgical technique through the use of customized CAD CAM titanium meshes (Yxoss CBR® Reoss) in order to show an alternative method of bone augmentation. Materials [...] Read more.
We performed this clinical study in order to evaluate the reliability of the Guided Bone Regeneration (GBR) surgical technique through the use of customized CAD CAM titanium meshes (Yxoss CBR® Reoss) in order to show an alternative method of bone augmentation. Materials and methods: Nine patients presenting 10 bone defects were referred to solve oral dysfunction due to edentulous atrophic ridges. Guided bone regeneration was performed with titanium meshes combined with autogenous bone grafting and heterologous bovine bone mineral grafting, and exclusively a “poncho technique” soft tissue approach for all the cases. After a mean 9 months of graft healing (range 6–12 months), titanium meshes were removed, and implant surgery was subsequently performed. The results we obtained were positive in terms of volumetric increases in height, length and thickness of the atrophic ridges without biological complications detectable before implant surgery. Results: Out of nine, one site met titanium mesh exposure: however, in all 10 sites a three-dimensional volumetric bone implementation was obtained. The statistical results were estimated by uploading and superimposing cbct scans before and after CBR surgery for each patient, so it was possible evaluate the maximum linear vertical and horizontal bone gain through dedicated Cad Cam software (Exocad GmbH®). The average horizontal gain was 6.37 ± 2.17 mm (range 2.78–9.12 mm) and vertical gain was 5.95 ± 2.06 mm (range 2.68–9.02 mm). A total of 18 implants were placed into the grafted sites with a 100% survival rate (clearly they are relative percentages to be compared to the short time elapsed). Conclusions: The results we obtained in this study suggest that this CBR procedure (Yxoss® by Reoss) is reliable and safe for bone regeneration to allow implant-prosthetic restoration in horizontal, vertical and combined bone defects. The soft tissue management is diriment: all the cases were managed with a “poncho” flap approach to decrease exposure complication. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Recent Advances in Dental Implantology)
Show Figures

Figure 1

11 pages, 1617 KB  
Article
Hard Tissue Volume Stability Effect beyond the Bony Envelope of a Three-Dimensional Preformed Titanium Mesh with Two Different Collagen Barrier Membranes on Peri-Implant Dehiscence Defects in the Anterior Maxilla: A Randomized Clinical Trial
by So-Ra Lee, Tae-Sik Jang, Chang-Su Seo, In-Oh Choi and Won-Pyo Lee
Materials 2021, 14(19), 5618; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14195618 - 27 Sep 2021
Cited by 8 | Viewed by 3075
Abstract
This single-blinded, randomized, controlled study aimed to clinically and radiographically evaluate hard tissue volume stability beyond the bony envelope using three-dimensional preformed titanium mesh (3D-PFTM) for peri-implant dehiscence defects in the anterior maxilla. A total of 28 patients who wished to undergo implant [...] Read more.
This single-blinded, randomized, controlled study aimed to clinically and radiographically evaluate hard tissue volume stability beyond the bony envelope using three-dimensional preformed titanium mesh (3D-PFTM) for peri-implant dehiscence defects in the anterior maxilla. A total of 28 patients who wished to undergo implant surgery combined with guided bone regeneration (GBR) after extraction of a single maxillary anterior tooth were randomly assigned to two groups depending on the type of collagen membrane used, additionally with the 3D-PFTM—test (n = 14, cross-linked collagen membrane; CCM) and control (n = 14, non-cross-linked collagen membrane; NCCM) groups. Each implant was evaluated radiographically using CBCT at baseline, immediately after surgery, and at 6 months postoperatively. The relative position and distances from the bony envelope to the outlines of the augmented ridge were further determined immediately after GBR and 6 months after healing. At the platform level, the mean horizontal hard tissue gain (HG) at all the sites was 2.35 ± 0.68 mm at 6 months postoperatively. The mean HG rate was 84.25% ± 14.19% in the CCM group and 82.56% ± 13.04% in the NCCM group, but the difference was not significant between the groups. In all cases, HG was maintained beyond the bony envelope even after 6 months of GBR. This study suggests that 3D-PFTM should be considered a valuable option for GBR for peri-implant dehiscence defects in the anterior maxilla. In addition, 3D-PFTM may confer predictable hard tissue volume stability even after the healing period of hard tissue augmented outside the bony envelope by GBR. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Dental Implants: Materials and Design)
Show Figures

Figure 1

11 pages, 1140 KB  
Article
Guided Bone Regeneration with Concentrated Growth Factor Enriched Bone Graft Matrix (Sticky Bone) vs. Bone-Shell Technique in Horizontal Ridge Augmentation: A Retrospective Study
by Horia Mihail Barbu, Stefania Andrada Iancu, Antonio Rapani and Claudio Stacchi
J. Clin. Med. 2021, 10(17), 3953; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm10173953 - 31 Aug 2021
Cited by 33 | Viewed by 7914
Abstract
Background: The purpose of this study was to compare clinical results of two different horizontal ridge augmentation techniques: guided bone regeneration with sticky bone (SB) and the bone-shell technique (BS). Methods: Records of patients who underwent horizontal ridge augmentation with SB (test) and [...] Read more.
Background: The purpose of this study was to compare clinical results of two different horizontal ridge augmentation techniques: guided bone regeneration with sticky bone (SB) and the bone-shell technique (BS). Methods: Records of patients who underwent horizontal ridge augmentation with SB (test) and BS (control) were screened for inclusion. Pre-operative and 6-month post-operative ridge widths were measured on cone beam computer tomography (CBCT) and compared. Post-operative complications and implant survival rate were recorded. Results: Eighty consecutive patients were included in the present study. Post-operative complications (flap dehiscence, and graft infection) occurred in ten patients, who dropped out from the study (12.5% complication rate). Stepwise multivariate logistic regression analysis showed a significant inverse correlation between the occurrence of post-operative complications and ridge width (p = 0.025). Seventy patients (35 test; 35 control) with a total of 127 implants were included in the final analysis. Mean ridge width gain was 3.7 ± 1.2 mm in the test and 3.7 ± 1.1 mm in the control group, with no significant difference between the two groups. No implant failure was recorded, with a mean follow-up of 42.7 ± 16.0 months after functional loading. Conclusions: SB and BS showed comparable clinical outcomes in horizontal ridge augmentation, resulting in sufficient crestal width increase to allow implant placement in an adequate bone envelope. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Bone Regeneration in Dentistry, Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery)
Show Figures

Figure 1

12 pages, 2856 KB  
Systematic Review
Alveolar Bone Ridge Augmentation Using Polymeric Membranes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
by Manuel Toledano-Osorio, Manuel Toledano, Francisco Javier Manzano-Moreno, Cristina Vallecillo, Marta Vallecillo-Rivas, Alberto Rodriguez-Archilla and Raquel Osorio
Polymers 2021, 13(7), 1172; https://doi.org/10.3390/polym13071172 - 6 Apr 2021
Cited by 19 | Viewed by 5166
Abstract
Alveolar bone ridge resorption occurred after natural teeth loss and it can restrict the possibility of dental implants placement. The use of bone regenerative procedures is frequently required. The existing evidence regarding the efficacy of horizontal bone ridge augmentation trough guided bone regeneration [...] Read more.
Alveolar bone ridge resorption occurred after natural teeth loss and it can restrict the possibility of dental implants placement. The use of bone regenerative procedures is frequently required. The existing evidence regarding the efficacy of horizontal bone ridge augmentation trough guided bone regeneration (GBR) using polymeric membranes was stated. A systematic review and meta-analysis were performed. Electronic and manual literature searches were conducted. Screening process was done using the National Library of Medicine (MEDLINE by PubMed), Embase, and the Cochrane Oral Health. Included articles were randomized controlled trials and observational studies. Weighted means were calculated. Heterogeneity was determined using Higgins (I2). If I2 > 50% a random-effects model was applied. It was found that the mean of horizontal bone gain was 3.95 mm, ranging from 3.19 to 4.70 mm (confidence interval 95%). Heterogeneity is I2 = 99% (confidence interval 95%) and significance of the random-effects model was p < 0.001. The complications rate was 8.4% and membrane exposure was the most frequent. Through this study, we were able to conclude that the existing scientific evidence suggests that GBR using polymeric membranes is a predictable technique for achieving horizontal bone augmentation, thus, permitting a proper further implant placement. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Polymeric Materials as Scaffolds for Tissue Engineering)
Show Figures

Figure 1

6 pages, 273 KB  
Case Report
Guided Bone Regeneration of an Atrophic Mandible with a Heterologous Bone Block
by Danilo Alessio Di Stefano, Gian Battista Greco and Francesco Riboli
Craniomaxillofac. Trauma Reconstr. 2016, 9(1), 88-93; https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0035-1551544 - 1 May 2015
Cited by 5
Abstract
The aim of this work was to test the effectiveness of using enzymatically deantigenated equine bone block as a scaffold for guided bone regeneration (GBR) during a horizontal augmentation of the lower jaw. A partially edentulous atrophic mandible was augmented using an equine-derived [...] Read more.
The aim of this work was to test the effectiveness of using enzymatically deantigenated equine bone block as a scaffold for guided bone regeneration (GBR) during a horizontal augmentation of the lower jaw. A partially edentulous atrophic mandible was augmented using an equine-derived block with an expanded polytetrafluoroethylene membrane. After 8.5 months, two bone core samples were collected at the augmentation site, and implants were placed. A definitive prosthesis delivered 6 months after implant placement provided excellent functional and aesthetic rehabilitation throughout the follow-up period. Histological and histomorphometrical analysis of the biopsies showed newly formed bone to be present and the residual biomaterial was still undergoing remodeling. Comparison of cone beam computed tomography scans taken before augmentation and 26 months later showed maintenance of ridge width and possible corticalization of the vestibular augmented ridge side. The equine-derived bone block placed in accordance with GBR principles provided a successful clinical, radiographic, and histological outcome. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop