Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (20)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = graphene-based materials (GBMs)

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
27 pages, 4795 KB  
Review
Graphene and Its Derivatives as Modulators of Macrophage Polarization in Cutaneous Wound Healing
by Iwona Lasocka, Michał Skibniewski, Iwona Pasternak, Anna Wróblewska, Zuzanna Biernacka, Ewa Skibniewska, Lidia Szulc-Dąbrowska and Marie Hubalek Kalbacova
Cells 2025, 14(24), 2001; https://doi.org/10.3390/cells14242001 - 16 Dec 2025
Viewed by 518
Abstract
Graphene-based materials (GBMs), owing to their excellent biomedical properties, can significantly advance the development of nano-biodressings. Their unique physicochemical features, such as high surface area, tunable functionalization, antimicrobial activity, and ability to interact with immune cells, suggest that GBMs may influence key biological [...] Read more.
Graphene-based materials (GBMs), owing to their excellent biomedical properties, can significantly advance the development of nano-biodressings. Their unique physicochemical features, such as high surface area, tunable functionalization, antimicrobial activity, and ability to interact with immune cells, suggest that GBMs may influence key biological processes involved in tissue repair, particularly the immune response. Building on this growing evidence, the aim of this review is to demonstrate that GBMs can serve as tools for modulating macrophage polarization as a strategy for promoting wound healing. We present the mechanisms by which GBMs penetrate macrophages and discuss the effects of GBMs, either in suspension or as scaffolds/grounds/substrates, on macrophage polarization. Moreover, we propose mechanisms underlying the actions of different forms of GBMs on macrophage polarization. Nevertheless, a multitude of uncertainties and significant challenges remain. Chief among these are the pronounced heterogeneity of GBM subtypes, the necessity for exhaustive characterization and in-depth analysis, the formulation of robust experimental designs, and the careful selection of models capable of accurately delineating macrophage populations and guiding their polarization toward achieving targeted wound healing outcomes. This review attempts to systematize and clarify these issues. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Cellular Immunology)
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

20 pages, 962 KB  
Review
Interplay Among Synaptic Glutamate Release and Excitotoxicity: Neuronal Damage and Graphene-Based Materials Related Protection
by Giada Cellot and Laura Ballerini
Life 2025, 15(11), 1776; https://doi.org/10.3390/life15111776 - 19 Nov 2025
Viewed by 1217
Abstract
Glutamate-related excitotoxicity represents a fundamental pathological process underlying both acute and chronic disorders of the central nervous system. Excessive stimulation of ionotropic and metabotropic glutamate receptors induces ionic dysregulation, mitochondrial dysfunction, and oxidative stress, which can activate necrotic and apoptotic pathways, processes further [...] Read more.
Glutamate-related excitotoxicity represents a fundamental pathological process underlying both acute and chronic disorders of the central nervous system. Excessive stimulation of ionotropic and metabotropic glutamate receptors induces ionic dysregulation, mitochondrial dysfunction, and oxidative stress, which can activate necrotic and apoptotic pathways, processes further amplified by defective glutamate clearance and astrocytic impairment. These mechanisms are recognized as key contributors to neuronal damage in ischemic stroke, Alzheimer’s disease, Parkinson’s disease, and Huntington’s disease, identifying excitotoxicity as a convergent hallmark of neurodegeneration. Despite considerable progress in elucidating its molecular mechanisms, clinical translation of excitotoxicity-targeted interventions remains limited, largely due to the difficulty of selectively attenuating pathological glutamatergic activity while preserving physiological neurotransmission. Recent advances in nanotechnology, particularly the development of graphene-based materials (GBMs), have offered innovative approaches for neuroprotection. Owing to their unique physicochemical properties and compatibility with neural tissue, GBMs have been investigated as platforms for neural interfacing, regenerative scaffolds, drug delivery platforms, and direct modulators of glutamatergic transmission. In particular, small graphene oxide nanosheets exhibit the capacity to downregulate glutamate release and confer anti-inflammatory and neuroprotective effects. These findings suggest that GBMs may represent a promising class of neuromodulatory tools for mitigating excitotoxic injury, warranting further preclinical and translational investigations. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Ion Channels and Neurological Disease: 2nd Edition)
Show Figures

Figure 1

19 pages, 3329 KB  
Article
Reduced Graphene Oxide Modulates Physiological Responses of Lemna minor Under Environmental Heavy Metal Stress
by Marco D’Eugenio, Barbara Casentini and M. Adelaide Iannelli
Environments 2025, 12(11), 407; https://doi.org/10.3390/environments12110407 - 1 Nov 2025
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 853
Abstract
The expanding development of graphene-based materials (GBMs) requires immediate and balanced environmental assessment balancing two key areas: investigating the risk of graphene oxide toxicity to ecosystems and evaluating GBMs’ potential to act as solutions for challenges like heavy metal stress mitigation. This study [...] Read more.
The expanding development of graphene-based materials (GBMs) requires immediate and balanced environmental assessment balancing two key areas: investigating the risk of graphene oxide toxicity to ecosystems and evaluating GBMs’ potential to act as solutions for challenges like heavy metal stress mitigation. This study analyzed the effects of reduced graphene oxide (rGO) on copper (Cu) and nickel (Ni) toxicity in Lemna minor. Our findings reveal that rGO’s protective effects are metal-specific. L. minor demonstrated significant sensitivity to nickel, but rGO offered no mitigation; growth parameters, pigment content, and nickel accumulation showed no significant improvements with rGO co-exposure compared to Ni-plants. This suggests that rGO does not enhance L. minor’s ability to tolerate or absorb nickel, especially after 14 days (T14). In contrast, rGO showed a partially protective effect against copper toxicity. At T14, the presence of rGO significantly improved plant performance under copper stress, resulting in a 17% increase in biomass, a 19% increase in relative growth rate, and enhanced pigment content, including a 40% increase in chlorophyll when compared to Cu-plants. The protective effect of rGO was directly tied to a 37% reduction in copper accumulation, providing strong evidence that rGO reduces copper’s bioavailability, thereby limiting plant uptake. The divergent effects on Cu and Ni uptake suggest differing affinities of these metals for rGO. Future research, including large-scale experiments with various GBMs and Lemna clones, is crucial to fully assessing their phytoremediation potential. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

42 pages, 7271 KB  
Review
Graphene Nanocomposites in the Targeting Tumor Microenvironment: Recent Advances in TME Reprogramming
by Argiris Kolokithas-Ntoukas, Andreas Mouikis and Athina Angelopoulou
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2025, 26(10), 4525; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms26104525 - 9 May 2025
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 1556
Abstract
Graphene-based materials (GBMs) have shown significant promise in cancer therapy due to their unique physicochemical properties, biocompatibility, and ease of functionalization. Their ability to target solid tumors, penetrate the tumor microenvironment (TME), and act as efficient drug delivery platforms highlights their potential in [...] Read more.
Graphene-based materials (GBMs) have shown significant promise in cancer therapy due to their unique physicochemical properties, biocompatibility, and ease of functionalization. Their ability to target solid tumors, penetrate the tumor microenvironment (TME), and act as efficient drug delivery platforms highlights their potential in nanomedicine. However, the complex and dynamic nature of the TME, characterized by metabolic heterogeneity, immune suppression, and drug resistance, poses significant challenges to effective cancer treatment. GBMs offer innovative solutions by enhancing tumor targeting, facilitating deep tissue penetration, and modulating metabolic pathways that contribute to tumor progression and immune evasion. Their functionalization with targeting ligands and biocompatible polymers improves their biosafety and specificity, while their ability to modulate immune cell interactions within the TME presents new opportunities for immunotherapy. Given the role of metabolic reprogramming in tumor survival and resistance, GBMs could be further exploited in metabolism-targeted therapies by disrupting glycolysis, mitochondrial respiration, and lipid metabolism to counteract the immunosuppressive effects of the TME. This review focuses on discussing research studies that design GBM nanocomposites with enhanced biodegradability, minimized toxicity, and improved efficacy in delivering therapeutic agents with the intention to reprogram the TME for effective anticancer therapy. Additionally, exploring the potential of GBM nanocomposites in combination with immunotherapies and metabolism-targeted treatments could lead to more effective and personalized cancer therapies. By addressing these challenges, GBMs could play a pivotal role in overcoming current limitations in cancer treatment and advancing precision oncology. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Multifunctional Nanocomposites for Bioapplications)
Show Figures

Figure 1

29 pages, 3233 KB  
Review
A Comprehensive Review on Bioprinted Graphene-Based Material (GBM)-Enhanced Scaffolds for Nerve Guidance Conduits
by Siheng Su and Jilong Wang
Biomimetics 2025, 10(4), 213; https://doi.org/10.3390/biomimetics10040213 - 31 Mar 2025
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1722
Abstract
Peripheral nerve injuries (PNIs) pose significant challenges to recovery, often resulting in impaired function and quality of life. To address these challenges, nerve guidance conduits (NGCs) are being developed as effective strategies to promote nerve regeneration by providing a supportive framework that guides [...] Read more.
Peripheral nerve injuries (PNIs) pose significant challenges to recovery, often resulting in impaired function and quality of life. To address these challenges, nerve guidance conduits (NGCs) are being developed as effective strategies to promote nerve regeneration by providing a supportive framework that guides axonal growth and facilitates reconnection of severed nerves. Among the materials being explored, graphene-based materials (GBMs) have emerged as promising candidates due to their unique properties. Their unique properties—such as high mechanical strength, excellent electrical conductivity, and favorable biocompatibility—make them ideal for applications in nerve repair. The integration of 3D printing technologies further enhances the development of GBM-based NGCs, enabling the creation of scaffolds with complex architectures and precise topographical cues that closely mimic the natural neural environment. This customization significantly increases the potential for successful nerve repair. This review offers a comprehensive overview of properties of GBMs, the principles of 3D printing, and key design strategies for 3D-printed NGCs. Additionally, it discusses future perspectives and research directions that could advance the application of 3D-printed GBMs in nerve regeneration therapies. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue 3D Bio-Printing for Regenerative Medicine Applications)
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

31 pages, 1994 KB  
Review
Graphene-Oxide Peptide-Containing Materials for Biomedical Applications
by Andreea Gostaviceanu, Simona Gavrilaş, Lucian Copolovici and Dana Maria Copolovici
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024, 25(18), 10174; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms251810174 - 22 Sep 2024
Cited by 23 | Viewed by 7715
Abstract
This review explores the application of graphene-based materials (GBMs) in biomedicine, focusing on graphene oxide (GO) and its interactions with peptides and proteins. GO, a versatile nanomaterial with oxygen-containing functional groups, holds significant potential for biomedical applications but faces challenges related to toxicity [...] Read more.
This review explores the application of graphene-based materials (GBMs) in biomedicine, focusing on graphene oxide (GO) and its interactions with peptides and proteins. GO, a versatile nanomaterial with oxygen-containing functional groups, holds significant potential for biomedical applications but faces challenges related to toxicity and environmental impact. Peptides and proteins can be functionalized on GO surfaces through various methods, including non-covalent interactions such as π–π stacking, electrostatic forces, hydrophobic interactions, hydrogen bonding, and van der Waals forces, as well as covalent bonding through reactions involving amide bond formation, esterification, thiol chemistry, and click chemistry. These approaches enhance GO’s functionality in several key areas: biosensing for sensitive biomarker detection, theranostic imaging that integrates diagnostics and therapy for real-time treatment monitoring, and targeted cancer therapy where GO can deliver drugs directly to tumor sites while being tracked by imaging techniques like MRI and photoacoustic imaging. Additionally, GO-based scaffolds are advancing tissue engineering and aiding tissues’ bone, muscle, and nerve tissue regeneration, while their antimicrobial properties are improving infection-resistant medical devices. Despite its potential, addressing challenges related to stability and scalability is essential to fully harness the benefits of GBMs in healthcare. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

26 pages, 9190 KB  
Review
The Recent Advancement of Graphene-Based Cathode Material for Rechargeable Zinc–Air Batteries
by Abrham Sendek Belete, Ababay Ketema Worku, Delele Worku Ayele, Addisu Alemayehu Assegie and Minbale Admas Teshager
Processes 2024, 12(8), 1684; https://doi.org/10.3390/pr12081684 - 12 Aug 2024
Cited by 3 | Viewed by 3013
Abstract
Graphene-based materials (GBMs) are a prospective material of choice for rechargeable battery electrodes because of their unique set of qualities, which include tunable interlayer channels, high specific surface area, and strong electrical conductivity characteristics. The market for commercial rechargeable batteries is now dominated [...] Read more.
Graphene-based materials (GBMs) are a prospective material of choice for rechargeable battery electrodes because of their unique set of qualities, which include tunable interlayer channels, high specific surface area, and strong electrical conductivity characteristics. The market for commercial rechargeable batteries is now dominated by lithium-ion batteries (LIBs). One of the primary factors impeding the development of new energy vehicles and large-scale energy storage applications is the safety of LIBs. Zinc-based rechargeable batteries have emerged as a viable substitute for rechargeable batteries due to their affordability, safety, and improved performance. This review article explores recent developments in the synthesis and advancement of GBMs for rechargeable zinc–air batteries (ZABs) and common graphene-based electrocatalyst types. An outlook on the difficulties and probable future paths of this extremely promising field of study is provided at the end. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Energy Systems)
Show Figures

Figure 1

28 pages, 5046 KB  
Review
Structural Manipulation of 3D Graphene-Based Macrostructures for Water Purification
by Zijun Yu, Li Wei, Lun Lu, Yi Shen, Yang Zhang, Jun Wang and Xiaoyao Tan
Gels 2022, 8(10), 622; https://doi.org/10.3390/gels8100622 - 29 Sep 2022
Cited by 9 | Viewed by 3176
Abstract
The rapid development of graphene-based nanotechnologies in recent years has drawn extensive attention in environmental applications, especially for water treatment. Three-dimensional graphene-based macrostructures (GBMs) have been considered to be promising materials for practical water purification due to their well-defined porous structure and integrated [...] Read more.
The rapid development of graphene-based nanotechnologies in recent years has drawn extensive attention in environmental applications, especially for water treatment. Three-dimensional graphene-based macrostructures (GBMs) have been considered to be promising materials for practical water purification due to their well-defined porous structure and integrated morphology, and displayed outstanding performance in pollutant abatement with easy recyclability. Three-dimensional GBMs could not only retain the intrinsic priorities of 2D graphene, but also emerge with extraordinary properties by structural manipulation, so rational design and construction of 3D GBMs with desirable microstructures are important to exploit their potential for water treatment. In this review, some important advances in surface modification (chemical doping, wettability, surface charge) and geometrical control (porous structure, oriented arrangement, shape and density) with respect to 3D GBMs have been described, while their applications in water purification including adsorption (organic pollutants, heavy metal ions), catalysis (photocatalysis, Fenton-like advanced oxidation) and capacitive desalination (CDI) are detailly discussed. Finally, future challenges and prospective for 3D GBMs in water purification are proposed. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue New Era in the Environmental Application of Hydrogel and Aerogel)
Show Figures

Figure 1

24 pages, 3942 KB  
Review
Graphene in Solid-State Batteries: An Overview
by Syed Atif Pervez, Milad Madinehei and Nima Moghimian
Nanomaterials 2022, 12(13), 2310; https://doi.org/10.3390/nano12132310 - 5 Jul 2022
Cited by 13 | Viewed by 7470
Abstract
Solid-state batteries (SSBs) have emerged as a potential alternative to conventional Li-ion batteries (LIBs) since they are safer and offer higher energy density. Despite the hype, SSBs are yet to surpass their liquid counterparts in terms of electrochemical performance. This is mainly due [...] Read more.
Solid-state batteries (SSBs) have emerged as a potential alternative to conventional Li-ion batteries (LIBs) since they are safer and offer higher energy density. Despite the hype, SSBs are yet to surpass their liquid counterparts in terms of electrochemical performance. This is mainly due to challenges at both the materials and cell integration levels. Various strategies have been devised to address the issue of SSBs. In this review, we have explored the role of graphene-based materials (GBM) in enhancing the electrochemical performance of SSBs. We have covered each individual component of an SSB (electrolyte, cathode, anode, and interface) and highlighted the approaches using GBMs to achieve stable and better performance. The recent literature shows that GBMs impart stability to SSBs by improving Li+ ion kinetics in the electrodes, electrolyte and at the interfaces. Furthermore, they improve the mechanical and thermal properties of the polymer and ceramic solid-state electrolytes (SSEs). Overall, the enhancements endowed by GBMs will address the challenges that are stunting the proliferation of SSBs. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

18 pages, 2251 KB  
Article
Comparative Life-Cycle Cost Analysis of Alternative Technologies for the Removal of Emerging Contaminants from Urban Wastewater
by David Pryce, Fatemah Alsharrah, Ahmed M. E. Khalil, Zoran Kapelan and Fayyaz A. Memon
Water 2022, 14(12), 1919; https://doi.org/10.3390/w14121919 - 14 Jun 2022
Cited by 11 | Viewed by 4156
Abstract
Emerging contaminants (ECs) continue to threaten our fragile ecosystem, yet their mitigation remains limited by economic factors. Meanwhile, a relatively expensive material, Graphene Oxide (GO), has shown promise as a solution for EC removal following further development into three graphene-based materials (GBMs): Porous [...] Read more.
Emerging contaminants (ECs) continue to threaten our fragile ecosystem, yet their mitigation remains limited by economic factors. Meanwhile, a relatively expensive material, Graphene Oxide (GO), has shown promise as a solution for EC removal following further development into three graphene-based materials (GBMs): Porous graphene adsorbent (PGa), Graphene-oxide foam adsorbent (GOFa), and the hybrid filter. Due to the nuances of each synthesis process, financial costs will differ throughout the GBMs’ life cycle which have been quantified and compared in the present work at a range of possible breakthrough times. Finally, economic and environmental costs have been combined for each technology to compare eco-efficiency. Results demonstrated a substantial economic advantage of the GBMs when compared to alternative technologies, most notably the GOFa filter that incurred the lowest life-cycle costs at $1.73 ± 0.09/m3. This was mainly attributed to the lower demand of GOFa on the most expensive material required for material synthesis, hydrazine. In addition, the material demands of GOFa were more evenly distributed which suggest a higher resilience of the overall costs to price hikes of individual materials required for synthesis. In terms of eco-efficiency the GOFa filter also demonstrated the greatest improvement when compared to the reference technology These results have provided robust total investment costs for several technologies that can now offer contrast to other EC-removal solutions. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Wastewater Treatment and Reuse)
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

2 pages, 193 KB  
Abstract
Nucleation Activity of Graphene in Polyamide 6-Based Nanocomposites Prepared by In Situ Polymerization
by Joana Lagarinhos and Martinho Oliveira
Mater. Proc. 2022, 8(1), 83; https://doi.org/10.3390/materproc2022008083 - 8 Jun 2022
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1462
Abstract
Graphene-based materials (GBM) are growing attention in automotive industry, due to potential of development lightweight structure parts with superior mechanical performance and thermal conductivity [...] Full article
(This article belongs to the Proceedings of MATERIAIS 2022)
30 pages, 1476 KB  
Review
Genotoxicity of Graphene-Based Materials
by Josefa Domenech, Adriana Rodríguez-Garraus, Adela López de Cerain, Amaya Azqueta and Julia Catalán
Nanomaterials 2022, 12(11), 1795; https://doi.org/10.3390/nano12111795 - 24 May 2022
Cited by 27 | Viewed by 3783
Abstract
Graphene-based materials (GBMs) are a broad family of novel carbon-based nanomaterials with many nanotechnology applications. The increasing market of GBMs raises concerns on their possible impact on human health. Here, we review the existing literature on the genotoxic potential of GBMs over the [...] Read more.
Graphene-based materials (GBMs) are a broad family of novel carbon-based nanomaterials with many nanotechnology applications. The increasing market of GBMs raises concerns on their possible impact on human health. Here, we review the existing literature on the genotoxic potential of GBMs over the last ten years. A total of 50 articles including in vitro, in vivo, in silico, and human biomonitoring studies were selected. Graphene oxides were the most analyzed materials, followed by reduced graphene oxides. Most of the evaluations were performed in vitro using the comet assay (detecting DNA damage). The micronucleus assay (detecting chromosome damage) was the most used validated assay, whereas only two publications reported results on mammalian gene mutations. The same material was rarely assessed with more than one assay. Despite inhalation being the main exposure route in occupational settings, only one in vivo study used intratracheal instillation, and another one reported human biomonitoring data. Based on the studies, some GBMs have the potential to induce genetic damage, although the type of damage depends on the material. The broad variability of GBMs, cellular systems and methods used in the studies precludes the identification of physico-chemical properties that could drive the genotoxicity response to GBMs. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

25 pages, 5532 KB  
Review
Fabrication of Polymer/Graphene Biocomposites for Tissue Engineering
by João Meneses, Tom van de Kemp, Raquel Costa-Almeida, Rúben Pereira, Fernão D. Magalhães, Miguel Castilho and Artur M. Pinto
Polymers 2022, 14(5), 1038; https://doi.org/10.3390/polym14051038 - 4 Mar 2022
Cited by 15 | Viewed by 4456
Abstract
Graphene-based materials (GBM) are considered one of the 21st century’s most promising materials, as they are incredibly light, strong, thin and have remarkable electrical and thermal properties. As a result, over the past decade, their combination with a diverse range of synthetic polymers [...] Read more.
Graphene-based materials (GBM) are considered one of the 21st century’s most promising materials, as they are incredibly light, strong, thin and have remarkable electrical and thermal properties. As a result, over the past decade, their combination with a diverse range of synthetic polymers has been explored in tissue engineering (TE) and regenerative medicine (RM). In addition, a wide range of methods for fabricating polymer/GBM scaffolds have been reported. This review provides an overview of the most recent advances in polymer/GBM composite development and fabrication, focusing on methods such as electrospinning and additive manufacturing (AM). As a future outlook, this work stresses the need for more in vivo studies to validate polymer/GBM composite scaffolds for TE applications, and gives insight on their fabrication by state-of-the-art processing technologies. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Graphene-Polymer Composites III)
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

23 pages, 69958 KB  
Review
Graphene-Based Materials Prove to Be a Promising Candidate for Nerve Regeneration Following Peripheral Nerve Injury
by Mina Aleemardani, Pariya Zare, Amelia Seifalian, Zohreh Bagher and Alexander M. Seifalian
Biomedicines 2022, 10(1), 73; https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines10010073 - 30 Dec 2021
Cited by 52 | Viewed by 6564 | Correction
Abstract
Peripheral nerve injury is a common medical condition that has a great impact on patient quality of life. Currently, surgical management is considered to be a gold standard first-line treatment; however, is often not successful and requires further surgical procedures. Commercially available FDA- [...] Read more.
Peripheral nerve injury is a common medical condition that has a great impact on patient quality of life. Currently, surgical management is considered to be a gold standard first-line treatment; however, is often not successful and requires further surgical procedures. Commercially available FDA- and CE-approved decellularized nerve conduits offer considerable benefits to patients suffering from a completely transected nerve but they fail to support neural regeneration in gaps > 30 mm. To address this unmet clinical need, current research is focused on biomaterial-based therapies to regenerate dysfunctional neural tissues, specifically damaged peripheral nerve, and spinal cord. Recently, attention has been paid to the capability of graphene-based materials (GBMs) to develop bifunctional scaffolds for promoting nerve regeneration, often via supporting enhanced neural differentiation. The unique features of GBMs have been applied to fabricate an electroactive conductive surface in order to direct stem cells and improve neural proliferation and differentiation. The use of GBMs for nerve tissue engineering (NTE) is considered an emerging technology bringing hope to peripheral nerve injury repair, with some products already in preclinical stages. This review assesses the last six years of research in the field of GBMs application in NTE, focusing on the fabrication and effects of GBMs for neurogenesis in various scaffold forms, including electrospun fibres, films, hydrogels, foams, 3D printing, and bioprinting. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

17 pages, 2698 KB  
Article
Structure–Activity Relationship of Graphene-Based Materials: Impact of the Surface Chemistry, Surface Specific Area and Lateral Size on Their In Vitro Toxicity
by Salma Achawi, Bruno Feneon, Jérémie Pourchez and Valérie Forest
Nanomaterials 2021, 11(11), 2963; https://doi.org/10.3390/nano11112963 - 4 Nov 2021
Cited by 30 | Viewed by 2912
Abstract
Predictive toxicity and structure–activity relationships (SARs) are raising interest since the number of nanomaterials has become unmanageable to assess their toxicity with a classical case-by-case approach. Graphene-based materials (GBMs) are among the most promising nanomaterials of this decade and their application might lead [...] Read more.
Predictive toxicity and structure–activity relationships (SARs) are raising interest since the number of nanomaterials has become unmanageable to assess their toxicity with a classical case-by-case approach. Graphene-based materials (GBMs) are among the most promising nanomaterials of this decade and their application might lead to several innovations. However, their toxicity impact needs to be thoroughly assessed. In this regard, we conducted a study on 22 GBMs to investigate their potential SARs by performing a complete physicochemical characterization and in vitro toxicity assessment (on RAW264.7 cells). We used GBMs of variable lateral size (0.5–38 µm), specific surface area (SSA, 30–880 m²/g), and surface oxidation (2–17%). We observed that reduced graphene oxides (RGOs) were more reactive than graphene nanoplatelets (GNPs), potentially highlighting the role of GBM’s surface chemistry and surface defects density in their biological impact. We also observed that for GNPs, a smaller lateral size caused higher cytotoxicity. Lastly, GBMs showing a SSA higher than 200 m²/g were found to induce a higher ROS production. Mechanistic explanations are proposed in the discussion. In conclusion, pairing a full physicochemical characterization with a standardized toxicity assessment of a large set of samples allowed us to clarify SARs and provide an additional step toward safe-by-design GBMs. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop