Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Article Types

Countries / Regions

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Search Results (357)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = gen-AI

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
28 pages, 32119 KB  
Article
NOAH: A Multi-Modal and Sensor Fusion Dataset for Generative Modeling in Remote Sensing
by Abdul Mutakabbir, Chung-Horng Lung, Marzia Zaman, Darshana Upadhyay, Kshirasagar Naik, Koreen Millard, Thambirajah Ravichandran and Richard Purcell
Remote Sens. 2026, 18(3), 466; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs18030466 (registering DOI) - 1 Feb 2026
Abstract
Earth Observation (EO) and Remote Sensing (RS) data are widely used in various fields, including weather, environment, and natural disaster modeling and prediction. EO and RS done through geostationary satellite constellations in fields such as these are limited to a smaller region, while [...] Read more.
Earth Observation (EO) and Remote Sensing (RS) data are widely used in various fields, including weather, environment, and natural disaster modeling and prediction. EO and RS done through geostationary satellite constellations in fields such as these are limited to a smaller region, while sun synchronous satellite constellations have discontinuous spatial and temporal coverage. This limits the ability of EO and RS data for near-real-time weather, environment, and natural disaster applications. To address these limitations, we introduce Now Observation Assemble Horizon (NOAH), a multi-modal, sensor fusion dataset that combines Ground-Based Sensors (GBS) of weather stations with topography, vegetation (land cover, biomass, and crown cover), and fuel types data from RS data sources. NOAH is collated using publicly available data from Environment and Climate Change Canada (ECCC), Spatialized CAnadian National Forest Inventory (SCANFI) and United States Geological Survey (USGS), which are well-maintained, documented, and reliable. Applications of the NOAH dataset include, but are not limited to, expanding RS data tiles, filling in missing data, and super-resolution of existing data sources. Additionally, Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) or Generative Modeling (GM) can be applied for near-real-time model-generated or synthetic estimate data for disaster modeling in remote locations. This can complement the use of existing observations by field instruments, rather than replacing them. UNet backbone with Feature-wise Linear Modulation (FiLM) injection of GBS data was used to demonstrate the initial proof-of-concept modeling in this research. This research also lists ideal characteristics for GM or GenAI datasets for RS. The code and a subset of the NOAH dataset (NOAH mini) are made open-sourced. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

18 pages, 5241 KB  
Viewpoint
The Generative AI Paradox: GenAI and the Erosion of Trust, the Corrosion of Information Verification, and the Demise of Truth
by Emilio Ferrara
Future Internet 2026, 18(2), 73; https://doi.org/10.3390/fi18020073 (registering DOI) - 1 Feb 2026
Abstract
Generative AI (GenAI) now produces text, images, audio, and video that can be perceptually convincing at scale and at negligible marginal cost. While public debate often frames the associated harms as “deepfakes” or incremental extensions of misinformation and fraud, this view misses a [...] Read more.
Generative AI (GenAI) now produces text, images, audio, and video that can be perceptually convincing at scale and at negligible marginal cost. While public debate often frames the associated harms as “deepfakes” or incremental extensions of misinformation and fraud, this view misses a broader socio-technical shift: GenAI enables synthetic realities—coherent, interactive, and potentially personalized information environments in which content, identity, and social interaction are jointly manufactured and mutually reinforcing. We argue that the most consequential risk is not merely the production of isolated synthetic artifacts, but the progressive erosion of shared epistemic ground and institutional verification practices as synthetic content, synthetic identity, and synthetic interaction become easy to generate and hard to audit. This paper (i) formalizes synthetic reality as a layered stack (content, identity, interaction, institutions), (ii) expands a taxonomy of GenAI harms spanning personal, economic, informational, and socio-technical risks, (iii) articulates the qualitative shifts introduced by GenAI (cost collapse, throughput, customization, micro-segmentation, provenance gaps, and trust erosion), and (iv) synthesizes recent risk realizations (2023–2025) into a compact case bank illustrating how these mechanisms manifest in fraud, elections, harassment, documentation, and supply-chain compromise. We then propose a mitigation stack that treats provenance infrastructure, platform governance, institutional workflow redesign, and public resilience as complementary rather than substitutable, and outline a research agenda focused on measuring epistemic security. We conclude with the Generative AI Paradox: as synthetic media becomes ubiquitous, societies may rationally discount digital evidence altogether, raising the cost of truth for everyday life and for democratic and economic institutions. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

25 pages, 3609 KB  
Review
Generative Artificial Intelligence and the Creative Industries: A Bibliometric Review and Research Agenda
by Mitja Bervar, Tine Bertoncel and Mirjana Pejić Bach
Systems 2026, 14(2), 138; https://doi.org/10.3390/systems14020138 - 29 Jan 2026
Viewed by 85
Abstract
Generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) is increasingly transforming creative industries through its ability to generate high-quality content, raising critical questions about authorship, ownership, and the future of creative labor. This paper addresses these challenges by conducting a systematic bibliometric review of 119 peer-reviewed articles [...] Read more.
Generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) is increasingly transforming creative industries through its ability to generate high-quality content, raising critical questions about authorship, ownership, and the future of creative labor. This paper addresses these challenges by conducting a systematic bibliometric review of 119 peer-reviewed articles on GenAI in the creative sectors, published between 2023 and 2025. The study applies PRISMA 2020 guidelines and keyword co-occurrence analysis using VOSviewer to identify thematic clusters and map research trends. The central research question is how the academic literature conceptualizes the role and impact of GenAI within creative industries and how this has evolved over time. Findings reveal nine major thematic areas, ranging from technical implementations to ethical, economic, and institutional perspectives. The analysis shows that recent research emphasizes not only the technological capacities of GenAI, but also its implications for value creation, creative agency, and industry structures. The main contribution of the paper lies in offering a structured overview of current research trajectories, clarifying conceptual ambiguities, and highlighting understudied areas—particularly regarding the intersection of GenAI, platform economies, and labor dynamics. The review also identifies a methodological gap in comparative empirical studies and proposes directions for future research. By mapping the evolving discourse on GenAI in creative industries, this study contributes to both scholarly understanding and policy development. It provides a foundation for interdisciplinary inquiry and a forward-looking agenda for critically assessing GenAI’s role in reshaping creative work. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Data-Driven Formation and Development of Business Ecosystems)
Show Figures

Figure 1

25 pages, 362 KB  
Article
Generative AI in Developing Countries: Adoption Dynamics in Vietnamese Local Government
by Phu Nguyen Duy, Charles Ruangthamsing, Peerasit Kamnuansilpa, Grichawat Lowatcharin and Prasongchai Setthasuravich
Informatics 2026, 13(2), 22; https://doi.org/10.3390/informatics13020022 - 28 Jan 2026
Viewed by 140
Abstract
Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) is rapidly reshaping public-sector operations, yet its adoption in developing countries remains poorly understood. Existing research focuses largely on traditional AI in developed contexts, leaving unanswered questions about how GenAI interacts with institutional, organizational, and governance constraints in resource-limited [...] Read more.
Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) is rapidly reshaping public-sector operations, yet its adoption in developing countries remains poorly understood. Existing research focuses largely on traditional AI in developed contexts, leaving unanswered questions about how GenAI interacts with institutional, organizational, and governance constraints in resource-limited settings. This study examines the organizational factors shaping GenAI adoption in Vietnamese local government using 25 semi-structured interviews analyzed through the Technology–Organization–Environment (TOE) framework. Findings reveal three central dynamics: (1) the emergence of informal, voluntary, and bottom-up experimentation with GenAI among civil servants; (2) significant institutional capacity constraints—including absent strategies, limited budgets, weak integration, and inadequate training—that prevent formal adoption; and (3) an “AI accountability vacuum” characterized by data security concerns, regulatory ambiguity, and unclear responsibility for AI-generated errors. Together, these factors create a state of governance paralysis in which GenAI is simultaneously encouraged and discouraged. The study contributes to theory by extending the TOE framework with an environment-specific construct—the AI accountability vacuum—and by reframing resistance as a rational response to structural gaps rather than technophobia. Practical implications highlight the need for capacity-building, regulatory guidance, accountable governance structures, and leadership-driven institutional support to enable safe and effective GenAI adoption in developing-country public sectors. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

17 pages, 512 KB  
Article
Does Gen-AI Enhance the Link Between Entrepreneurship Education and Student Innovation Behavior? Insights for Quality and Sustainable Higher Education
by Fatme El Zahraa Rahal, Panteha Farmanesh, Hassan Houmani and Niloofar Solati Dehkordi
Sustainability 2026, 18(3), 1258; https://doi.org/10.3390/su18031258 - 27 Jan 2026
Viewed by 144
Abstract
Education in entrepreneurship offers university students the opportunity to develop sound problem-solving and critical-thinking dexterity, which are crucial for navigating contemporary higher education. This research explores the opportunities and challenges of education in entrepreneurship within universities based in Lebanon, focusing on the role [...] Read more.
Education in entrepreneurship offers university students the opportunity to develop sound problem-solving and critical-thinking dexterity, which are crucial for navigating contemporary higher education. This research explores the opportunities and challenges of education in entrepreneurship within universities based in Lebanon, focusing on the role of fostering entrepreneurial alertness/awareness. This paper further examines how emerging technologies—specifically Generative Artificial Intelligence (Gen-AI)—impact these relationships. In spite of the increasing relevance of entrepreneurship, the results reveal constant limitations in students’ innovation and creativity, together with a lack of mentorship and training prospects for teachers. The study underlines the importance of integrating innovative systems, digital technological means, and sustainable education values to support SDG 4 (Quality Education) and reinforce learning quality environments. To empirically explore the relationships between the variables, the research uses a quantitative research design, using SmartPLS4 to investigate the structural paths between entrepreneurship education, student innovative behavior, entrepreneurial alertness, and the use of Gen-AI. Our data was collected from 197 participants through a validated survey scheme, together with insights received from instructors and students. The results indicate that instructors consider entrepreneurship education positively and recognize the potential of Gen-AI to improve teaching quality, encourage entrepreneurial alertness, and strengthen quality learning practices. Students also highlighted their requirement to acquire new skills and access new opportunities to enhance their decision-making abilities. Generally, the results/findings suggest that entrepreneurship education—emboldened by entrepreneurial alertness and moderated by Gen-AI—plays a vital role in improving students’ innovative behaviors and progressing SDG 4 through high-quality, inclusive, and transformative higher education. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

22 pages, 733 KB  
Article
School Principals’ Perspectives and Leadership Styles for Digital Transformation: A Q-Methodology Study
by Peili Yuan, Xinshen Chen and Huan Song
Behav. Sci. 2026, 16(2), 165; https://doi.org/10.3390/bs16020165 - 24 Jan 2026
Viewed by 292
Abstract
The advent of generative AI (GenAI) and its growing use in education has sparked a renewed wave of school digital transformation. School principals are pivotal in advancing and shaping school digital transformation, yet little is known about how they understand and lead digital [...] Read more.
The advent of generative AI (GenAI) and its growing use in education has sparked a renewed wave of school digital transformation. School principals are pivotal in advancing and shaping school digital transformation, yet little is known about how they understand and lead digital transformation in the age of GenAI, particularly within China’s complex educational system. This study employed Q methodology to identify the perceptions and leadership styles of Chinese K–12 school principals toward school digital transformation in the age of GenAI. An analysis of a 30-item Q set with a P sample of 23 principals revealed four leadership types: Cautious Observation–Technological Gatekeeping Leadership, Moderate Ambition–Culturally Transformative Leadership, Moderate Ambition–Emotionally Empowering Leadership, and High Aspiration–Strategy-Driven Leadership. Overall, principals’ stances on GenAI formed a continuum, ranging from cautious observation and skeptical optimism to active embrace. These perceptions and leadership styles were shaped by Confucian cultural values, a flexible central–local governance arrangement, and parents’ high expectations for students’ academic achievement. Furthermore, structural constraints in resource provision further heightened principals’ reliance on maintaining guanxi-based relationships. This study enhances the understanding of the diversity of principals’ leadership practices worldwide and offers actionable insights for governments and principals to more effectively advance AI-enabled school digital transformation. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Leadership in the New Era of Technology)
Show Figures

Figure 1

16 pages, 803 KB  
Article
AI-Powered Physiotherapy: Evaluating LLMs Against Students in Clinical Rehabilitation Scenarios
by Ioanna Michou, Athanasios Fouras, Dionysia Chrysanthakopoulou, Marina Theodoritsi, Savina Mariettou, Sotiria Stellatou and Constantinos Koutsojannis
Appl. Sci. 2026, 16(3), 1165; https://doi.org/10.3390/app16031165 - 23 Jan 2026
Viewed by 203
Abstract
Generative artificial intelligence (GenAI), particularly large language models (LLMs) such as ChatGPT and DeepSeek, is transforming healthcare by enhancing clinical decision-making, education, and patient interaction. This exploratory study compares the responses of ChatGPT (GPT-4.1) and DeepSeek-V2 against 90 final-year physiotherapy students in Greece [...] Read more.
Generative artificial intelligence (GenAI), particularly large language models (LLMs) such as ChatGPT and DeepSeek, is transforming healthcare by enhancing clinical decision-making, education, and patient interaction. This exploratory study compares the responses of ChatGPT (GPT-4.1) and DeepSeek-V2 against 90 final-year physiotherapy students in Greece on the quality of the responses to 60 clinical questions across four rehabilitation domains: low back pain, multiple sclerosis, frozen shoulder, and knee osteoarthritis (15 questions per domain). The questions spanned basic knowledge, diagnosis, alternative treatments, and rehabilitation practices. The responses were evaluated for their relevance, accuracy, clarity, completeness, and consistency with clinical practice guidelines (CPGs), emphasizing conceptual understanding. This study provides novel contributions by (i) benchmarking LLMs in physiotherapy-specific domains (low back pain, multiple sclerosis, frozen shoulder, and knee osteoarthritis) underrepresented in prior AI-health evaluations; (ii) directly comparing the LLM written response quality to student performance under exam constraints; and (iii) highlighting the improvement potential for education, complementing ChatGPT’s established role in physician decision support. The results indicate that the LLMs produced higher-quality written responses than students in most domains, particularly in the global response quality and the conceptual depth of written responses, highlighting their potential as educational aids for knowledge-based tasks, although not equivalent to clinical expertise. This suggests AI’s role in physiotherapy as a supportive tool rather than a replacement for hands-on clinical skills and asks whether GenAI could transform physiotherapy practice by augmenting, rather than threatening, human-centered care, for its potential as a knowledge support tool in education, pending validation in clinical contexts. This study explores these findings, compares them with the related work, and discusses whether GenAI will transform or threaten physiotherapy practice. Ethical considerations, limitations, and future directions, including AI voice assistants and AI characters, are addressed. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

21 pages, 1482 KB  
Article
Advancing a Sustainable Human–AI Collaboration Ecosystem in Interface Design: A User-Centered Analysis of Interaction Processes and Design Opportunities Based on Participants from China
by Chang Xiong, Guangliang Sang and Ken Nah
Sustainability 2026, 18(2), 1139; https://doi.org/10.3390/su18021139 - 22 Jan 2026
Viewed by 178
Abstract
The application of Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI)—defined as a class of AI systems capable of autonomously generating new content such as images, texts, and design solutions based on learned data patterns—has become increasingly widespread in creative design. By supporting ideation, rapid trial-and-error, and [...] Read more.
The application of Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI)—defined as a class of AI systems capable of autonomously generating new content such as images, texts, and design solutions based on learned data patterns—has become increasingly widespread in creative design. By supporting ideation, rapid trial-and-error, and data-driven decision-making, GenAI enables designers to explore design alternatives more efficiently and enhances human–computer interaction experiences. In design practice, GenAI functions not only as a productivity-enhancing tool but also as a collaborative partner that assists users in visual exploration, concept refinement, and iterative development. However, users still face a certain learning curve before effectively adopting these technologies. Within the framework of human-centered artificial intelligence, contemporary design practices place greater emphasis on inclusivity across diverse user groups and on enabling intuitive “what-you-think-is-what-you-get” interaction experiences. From a sustainable design perspective, GenAI’s capabilities in digital simulation, rapid iteration, and automated feedback contribute to more efficient design workflows, reduced collaboration costs, and broader access to creative participation for users with varying levels of expertise. These characteristics play a crucial role in enhancing the accessibility of design resources and supporting the long-term sustainability of creative processes. Focusing on the context of China’s digital design industry, this study investigates the application of GenAI in design workflows through an empirical case study of Zhitu AI, a generative design tool developed by Beijing Didi Infinity Technology Development Co., Ltd. The study conducts a literature review to outline the role of GenAI in visual design processes and employs observation-based experiments and semi-structured interviews with users of varying levels of design expertise. The findings reveal key pain points across stages such as prompt formulation, secondary editing, and asset generation. Drawing on the Kano model, the study further identifies potential design opportunities and discusses their value in improving efficiency, supporting non-expert users, and promoting more sustainable and inclusive design practices. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Sustainable Products and Services)
Show Figures

Figure 1

19 pages, 1420 KB  
Article
Turning the Page: Pre-Class AI-Generated Podcasts Improve Student Outcomes in Ecology and Environmental Biology
by Laura Díaz and Víctor D. Carmona-Galindo
Educ. Sci. 2026, 16(1), 168; https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci16010168 - 22 Jan 2026
Viewed by 95
Abstract
In the aftermath of the COVID-19 pandemic, instructors in higher education have reported a decline in foundational reading habits, particularly in STEM courses where dense, technical texts are common. This study examines a low-barrier instructional intervention that used generative AI (GenAI) to support [...] Read more.
In the aftermath of the COVID-19 pandemic, instructors in higher education have reported a decline in foundational reading habits, particularly in STEM courses where dense, technical texts are common. This study examines a low-barrier instructional intervention that used generative AI (GenAI) to support pre-class preparation in two upper-division biology courses. Weekly AI-generated audio overviews—“podcasts”—were paired with timed, textbook-based online quizzes. These tools were not intended to replace reading, but to scaffold engagement, reduce preparation anxiety, and promote early familiarity with course content. We analyzed student engagement, perceptions, and performance using pre/post surveys, quiz scores, and exam outcomes. Students reported that the podcasts helped manage time constraints, improved their readiness for lecture, and increased their motivation to read. Those who consistently completed the quizzes performed significantly better on closed-book, in-class exams and earned higher final course grades. Our findings suggest that GenAI tools, when integrated intentionally, can reintroduce structured learning behaviors in post-pandemic classrooms. By meeting students where they are—without compromising cognitive rigor—audio-based scaffolds may offer inclusive, scalable strategies for improving academic performance and reengaging students with scientific content in an increasingly attention-fragmented educational landscape. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

15 pages, 1045 KB  
Systematic Review
AI at the Bedside of Psychiatry: Comparative Meta-Analysis of Imaging vs. Non-Imaging Models for Bipolar vs. Unipolar Depression
by Andrei Daescu, Ana-Maria Cristina Daescu, Alexandru-Ioan Gaitoane, Ștefan Maxim, Silviu Alexandru Pera and Liana Dehelean
J. Clin. Med. 2026, 15(2), 834; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm15020834 - 20 Jan 2026
Viewed by 169
Abstract
Background: Differentiating bipolar disorder (BD) from unipolar major depressive disorder (MDD) at first episode is clinically consequential but challenging. Artificial intelligence/machine learning (AI/ML) may improve early diagnostic accuracy across imaging and non-imaging data sources. Methods: Following PRISMA 2020 and a pre-registered [...] Read more.
Background: Differentiating bipolar disorder (BD) from unipolar major depressive disorder (MDD) at first episode is clinically consequential but challenging. Artificial intelligence/machine learning (AI/ML) may improve early diagnostic accuracy across imaging and non-imaging data sources. Methods: Following PRISMA 2020 and a pre-registered protocol on protocols.io, we searched PubMed, Scopus, Europe PMC, Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, The Lens, medRxiv, ClinicalTrials.gov, and Web of Science (2014–8 October 2025). Eligible studies developed/evaluated supervised ML classifiers for BD vs. MDD at first episode and reported test-set discrimination. AUCs were meta-analyzed on the logit (GEN) scale using random effects (REML) with Hartung–Knapp adjustment and then back-transformed. Subgroup (imaging vs. non-imaging), leave-one-out (LOO), and quality sensitivity (excluding high risk of leakage) analyses were prespecified. Risk of bias used QUADAS-2 with PROBAST/AI considerations. Results: Of 158 records, 39 duplicates were removed and 119 records screened; 17 met qualitative criteria; and 6 had sufficient data for meta-analysis. The pooled random-effects AUC was 0.84 (95% CI 0.75–0.90), indicating above-chance discrimination, with substantial heterogeneity (I2 = 86.5%). Results were robust to LOO, exclusion of two high-risk-of-leakage studies (pooled AUC 0.83, 95% CI 0.72–0.90), and restriction to higher-rigor validation (AUC 0.83, 95% CI 0.69–0.92). Non-imaging models showed higher point estimates than imaging models; however, subgroup comparisons were exploratory due to the small number of studies: pooled AUC ≈ 0.90–0.92 with I2 = 0% vs. 0.79 with I2 = 64%; test for subgroup difference Q = 7.27, df = 1, p = 0.007. Funnel plot inspection and Egger/Begg tests found that we could not reliably assess small-study effects/publication bias due to the small number of studies. Conclusions: AI/ML models provide good and robust discrimination of BD vs. MDD at first episode. Non-imaging approaches are promising due to higher point estimates in the available studies and practical scalability, but prospective evaluation is needed and conclusions about modality superiority remain tentative given the small number of non-imaging studies (k = 2). Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue How Clinicians See the Use of AI in Psychiatry)
Show Figures

Figure 1

18 pages, 337 KB  
Article
Exploring GenAI-Powered Listening Test Development
by Junyan Guo
Languages 2026, 11(1), 17; https://doi.org/10.3390/languages11010017 - 20 Jan 2026
Viewed by 331
Abstract
The advent of Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) has ushered in a transformative wave within the field of language education. However, the applications of GenAI are primarily in language teaching and learning, with assessment receiving much less attention. Drawing on task characteristics identified from [...] Read more.
The advent of Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) has ushered in a transformative wave within the field of language education. However, the applications of GenAI are primarily in language teaching and learning, with assessment receiving much less attention. Drawing on task characteristics identified from a corpus of authentic prior tests, this study investigated the capacity of GenAI tools to develop a short College English Test-Band 4 (CET-4) listening test and examined the degree to which its content, concurrent, and face validity corresponded to those of an authentic, human-generated counterpart. The findings indicated that the GenAI-created test aligned well with the task characteristics of the target test domain, supporting its content validity, whereas sufficient robust evidence to substantiate its concurrent or face validity was limited. Overall, GenAI has demonstrated potential in developing listening tests; however, further optimization is needed to enhance their validity. Implications for language teaching, learning and assessment are therefore discussed. Full article
23 pages, 483 KB  
Article
Redefining Agency: A Capability-Driven Research Agenda for Generative AI in Education
by Toshinori Saito
Educ. Sci. 2026, 16(1), 155; https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci16010155 - 19 Jan 2026
Viewed by 366
Abstract
(1) Aim: This paper aims to develop a research agenda grounded in the Capability Approach to address the “quality of use” gap emerging from the proliferation of generative AI (GenAI) in education. (2) Method: We conducted a deductive thematic analysis of 21 recent [...] Read more.
(1) Aim: This paper aims to develop a research agenda grounded in the Capability Approach to address the “quality of use” gap emerging from the proliferation of generative AI (GenAI) in education. (2) Method: We conducted a deductive thematic analysis of 21 recent academic papers (2023–2025) using the Capability-Driven Digital Education Framework (CDDEF) to synthesise emerging discourse on digital empowerment. (3) Findings: The thematic synthesis reveals three cross-cutting themes: the ambiguous impact of AI on human capabilities (scaffold vs. crutch), the shift in educational inequality from access to quality and justice, and the necessity of redefining human agency in partnership with AI. (4) Implications: The resulting agenda provides a roadmap for researchers and policymakers to ensure GenAI functions as a scaffold for expanding substantive freedoms rather than exacerbating digital divides. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Supporting Learner Engagement in Technology-Rich Environments)
Show Figures

Figure 1

48 pages, 10884 KB  
Article
A Practical Incident-Response Framework for Generative AI Systems
by Derrisa Tuscano and Jules Pagna Disso
J. Cybersecur. Priv. 2026, 6(1), 20; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcp6010020 - 19 Jan 2026
Viewed by 405
Abstract
Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) systems have introduced new classes of security incidents that traditional response frameworks were not designed to manage, ranging from model manipulation and data exfiltration to misinformation cascades and prompt-based privilege escalation. This study proposes a Practical Incident-Response Framework for [...] Read more.
Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) systems have introduced new classes of security incidents that traditional response frameworks were not designed to manage, ranging from model manipulation and data exfiltration to misinformation cascades and prompt-based privilege escalation. This study proposes a Practical Incident-Response Framework for Generative AI Systems (GenAI-IRF) that bridges established cybersecurity standards with emerging AI assurance principles. Using a Design Science Research (DSR) approach, this study identifies six recurrent incident archetypes and formalises a structured playbook aligned with NIST SP 800-61r3, NIST AI 600-1, MITRE ATLAS, and OWASP LLM Top-10. The artefact was evaluated in controlled scenarios using scenario-based simulations and expert reviews involving AI-security practitioners from academia, finance, and technology sectors. The results suggest high inter-rater reliability (κ = 0.88), strong usability (SUS = 86.4), and improved incident resolution times compared to baseline procedures. The findings demonstrate how traditional response models can be adapted to GenAI contexts using taxonomy-driven analysis, artefact-centred validation, and practitioner feedback. This framework provides a practical foundation for security teams seeking to operationalise AI incident response and contributes to the emerging body of work on trustworthy and resilient AI systems. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Cyber Security and Digital Forensics—2nd Edition)
Show Figures

Figure 1

24 pages, 1926 KB  
Systematic Review
Applications of Generative AI in Architectural Design Education: A Systematic Review and Future Insights
by Rawan Alamasi and Omar S. Asfour
Digital 2026, 6(1), 6; https://doi.org/10.3390/digital6010006 - 19 Jan 2026
Viewed by 395
Abstract
This study reviews the current applications of generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) in architectural design education using the PRISMA framework. It compares these applications across the different design stages, namely the pre-design, concept generation, design development, and design production, to identify the current state [...] Read more.
This study reviews the current applications of generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) in architectural design education using the PRISMA framework. It compares these applications across the different design stages, namely the pre-design, concept generation, design development, and design production, to identify the current state of evidence and conceptual discussions reported in the literature. The study also discusses the associated opportunities and challenges in this regard. The findings indicate that there is a growing interest in integrating GenAI into architectural design education, especially in the early design stages. However, one of the most significant gaps in this regard lies in the lack of empirical evidence on the long-term impacts of GenAI on students’ critical thinking and problem-solving skills. Future research is needed to explore the integration of GenAI throughout the entire design process, including design development and refinement. There is also a need to incorporate the relevant ethical guidelines for AI-generated content into academic quality assurance systems and to strengthen institutional preparedness through targeted training and policy development. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

25 pages, 2212 KB  
Article
Will AI Replace Us? Changing the University Teacher Role
by Walery Okulicz-Kozaryn, Artem Artyukhov and Nadiia Artyukhova
Societies 2026, 16(1), 32; https://doi.org/10.3390/soc16010032 - 16 Jan 2026
Viewed by 274
Abstract
This study examines how Artificial Intelligence (AI) is reshaping the role of university teachers and transforming the foundations of academic work in the digital age. Building on the Dynamic Capabilities Theory (sensing–seizing–transforming), the article proposes a theoretical reframing of university teachers’ perceptions of [...] Read more.
This study examines how Artificial Intelligence (AI) is reshaping the role of university teachers and transforming the foundations of academic work in the digital age. Building on the Dynamic Capabilities Theory (sensing–seizing–transforming), the article proposes a theoretical reframing of university teachers’ perceptions of AI. This approach allows us to bridge micro-level emotions with meso-level HR policies and macro-level sustainability goals (SDGs 4, 8, and 9). The empirical foundation includes a survey of 453 Ukrainian university teachers (2023–2025) and statistics, supplemented by a bibliometric analysis of 26,425 Scopus-indexed documents. The results indicate that teachers do not anticipate a large-scale replacement by AI within the next five years. However, their fear of losing control over AI technologies is stronger than the fear of job displacement. This divergence, interpreted through the lens of dynamic capabilities, reveals weak sensing signals regarding professional replacement but stronger signals requiring managerial seizing and institutional transformation. The bibliometric analysis further demonstrates a theoretical evolution of the university teacher’s role: from a technological adopter (2021–2022) to a mediator of ethics and integrity (2023–2024), and, finally, to a designer and architect of AI-enhanced learning environments (2025). The study contributes to theory by extending the application of Dynamic Capabilities Theory to higher education governance and by demonstrating that teachers’ perceptions of AI serve as indicators of institutional resilience. Based on Dynamic Capabilities Theory, the managerial recommendations are divided into three levels: government, institutional, and scientific-didactic (academic). Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Technology and Social Change in the Digital Age)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop