Search Results (32)

Background and Objectives: Although clinically useful, homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) testing has recently been more broadly adopted in ovarian cancer (OC) management. The VALIDATE study evaluated HRD status and treatment patterns in patients with newly diagnosed advanced OC in Bulgaria to better understand HRD prevalence and disease management. Materials and Methods: This real-world, observational, multi-centre, medical chart review study included 100 adult patients with HRD testing results available at study entry. Data collected at least 30 days after HRD results and 6 months later were descriptively analysed in the full cohort and subgroups (HRD, BRCA mutation, and genomic instability score [GIS]). Results: Mean age at diagnosis: 61.3 years; stage III: 51.0%, prevalence of HRD+ 58.0% (95% confidence intervals [CI] 47.7–67.8%) and HRD− 42.0% (95% CI 32.2–52.3%). Among the 58 HRD+ patients, 20 (34.5%) were BRCA+, whereas 38 (65.5%) were BRCA−, and 52 (89.7%) were GIS+, and 6 (10.3%) GIS−. Overall, platinum–taxane chemotherapy plus antiangiogenics was the most common front-line (FL) treatment (77.0%), regardless of subgroups (range: 66.7–85.0%). Six months later, 81 patients were alive, and 73 (90%) started maintenance therapy (MT). Antiangiogenic monotherapy (32.0%) and antiangiogenic plus PARP inhibitor (34.0%) were the most common MTs. The latter was also common across subgroups (range: 33.3–60.5%), except for HRD− (61.9% received antiangiogenic monotherapy). Conclusions: In this dataset, more than half of advanced OC patients had HRD+ status. Our study provides relevant insights into recent clinical practice patterns in advanced OC in Bulgaria that could serve as an anchor for future, more robust research in this field. Full article

Background: The prognostic significance of histological transformation (HT) in treatment-naive diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) remains controversial. This study aimed to evaluate the clinical outcomes and failure patterns of treatment-naive transformed DLBCL (trDLBCL) compared with de novo DLBCL using a large-scale cohort. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 1735 consecutively enrolled treatment-naive DLBCL patients (118 trDLBCL and 1617 de novo). Propensity score matching (PSM) was performed to balance baseline characteristics. Survival outcomes were assessed using Kaplan–Meier and Cox proportional hazards models. Subgroups were defined by pathology (t-FL vs. t-MZL) and pattern: concurrent (synchronous indolent lymphoma and DLBCL components at diagnosis) vs. pure transformation (DLBCL occurring as the sole histology in patients with a prior history of untreated indolent lymphoma). Results: In the overall cohort, trDLBCL was associated with significantly inferior progression-free survival (PFS) compared with de novo disease and remained an independent adverse prognostic factor in multivariable analysis (HR 1.754, p < 0.001). These findings were confirmed in a 1:1 propensity score-matched cohort (108 pairs), where trDLBCL continued to show worse PFS (p < 0.01), while overall survival (OS) was comparable (p = 0.99). Within trDLBCL patients, the underlying indolent subtype (t-FL vs. t-MZL) did not significantly affect survival (PFS p = 0.17, OS p = 0.35), whereas “pure transformation” was associated with markedly inferior PFS (p = 0.005) and OS (HR 2.56, p = 0.02) compared with concurrent transformation. Failure pattern analysis revealed a higher risk of early progression in trDLBCL (POD24: 30.56% vs. 18.52%; OR 1.94, 95% CI: 1.05–3.56), whereas central nervous system (CNS) involvement was low and comparable between groups (2.78% vs. 0.93%, p = 0.62). Conclusions: Treatment-naive trDLBCL is associated with inferior PFS driven by early progression, whereas OS is comparable due to effective salvage therapies. Pure transformation appeared to define a higher-risk subgroup with inferior disease control, supporting the need for future prospective studies to evaluate risk-adapted frontline, consolidation, or maintenance strategies. Full article

Background: High-risk cytogenetic multiple myeloma (HRMM) confers inferior outcomes despite significant therapeutic advances. Real-world data characterizing contemporary treatment patterns across lines of therapy in this population are limited. Methods: We conducted a multicenter retrospective study of 205 patients with HRMM diagnosed between January 2009 and January 2024. High-risk cytogenetics were defined according to the International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) and Revised International Staging System (R-ISS) criteria as the presence of del(17p), t(4;14), t(14;16), t(14;20), and/or gain/amplification of 1q21. Treatment regimens were categorized by the number of agents (doublet, triplet, quadruplet), mechanism of action (proteasome inhibitor [PI]-based, immunomodulatory drug [IMiD]-based, and anti-CD38 monoclonal antibody-based), and specific regimen composition. Treatment patterns were analyzed across three treatment eras and stratified by age (<70 vs. ≥70 years). Results: The cohort included 205 patients (median age, 62 years [interquartile range [IQR], 54–68 years]; 78.5% aged <70 years). Double-hit and triple-hit cytogenetics were present in 60.0% and 7.3% of patients, respectively. For first-line induction, triplet therapy predominated (81.0%, n = 166), followed by quadruplet (8.8%, n = 18), doublet (5.9%, n = 12), and multi-agent chemotherapy (2.9%, n = 6). By mechanism of action, PI + IMiD combinations were the most common (63.4%, n = 130), followed by PI-based (19.0%, n = 39), anti-CD38-based (10.2%, n = 21), and IMiD-based (2.9%, n = 6) regimens. Era-stratified analysis revealed a significant increase in quadruplet utilization from 3.2% in Era 1 (2009–2015) to 20.3% in Era 3 (2020–2024), with anti-CD38-containing frontline regimens administered to 26.6% of patients in the contemporary era (p < 0.001). Second-line induction was required in 50 patients (24.4%), with anti-CD38-based triplets comprising the most common approach (30.0%). Autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) was performed in 75.1% of patients overall, with significantly higher utilization in those aged <70 years (83.9% vs. 43.2%). Maintenance therapy was administered to 71.7% of patients (n = 147), with IMiD-based regimens predominating (53.1%), followed by PI + IMiD combinations (27.9%) and anti-CD38-containing regimens (10.2%). Despite intensive therapy, 69.4% of patients on maintenance experienced disease relapse, with higher rates observed in younger patients (74.8% vs. 41.7%). Conclusions: In this real-world HRMM cohort, the PI + IMiD triplet regimen remained the predominant induction approach, with a significant shift toward quadruplet and anti-CD38-containing regimens in the contemporary era. However, substantial relapse rates during maintenance underscore the continued unmet need in HRMM and support the early integration of novel therapeutic strategies, including quadruplet induction and BCMA-directed agents, in this population. Full article

Background/Objectives: In recent years there has been a consistent development of clinical studies surrounding the incorporation of the B-cell lymphoma 2 (BCL-2) inhibitor venetoclax (VEN) into the treatment of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) Methods: A search of the literature showed a tremendous development of experimental and clinical studies evaluating the impact of VEN-based regimens in the treatment of AML patients. This review comprehensively analyzes the available scientific evidence—including prospective clinical trials, retrospective cohorts, and real-world studies—to summarize current knowledge on the efficacy and safety of venetoclax-based regimens in AML patients. Results: Recent studies have evaluated VEN-based regimens in newly diagnosed (ND) and refractory/relapsed (R/R) AML patients, showing the efficacy of these treatments. VEN with hypomethylating agents (HMAs) became the standard-of-care for elderly/unfit AML patients. Recent studies strongly support the effectiveness of VEN-based regimens in frontline treatment of adult AML patients eligible for intensive treatments. VEN-based therapies were also used in combination with targeted therapies, thus generating triplet therapeutic regimens that are under evaluation for the treatment of some AML subtypes. However, the response to VEN+HMAs is highly variable and in part depends on tumor genetics; some patients are resistant or relapse following VEN-based treatments and future studies will be required to develop therapeutic strategies able to circumvent resistance and to identify patients at high risk of relapse. Prospective randomized trials are required to establish the real efficacy of VEN in various clinical settings and to refine maintenance and discontinuation strategies, aiming to improve long-term outcomes and to make more safe treatments based on VEN. Full article

Ovarian cancer remains a leading cause of gynecologic cancer–related mortality worldwide, and long-term outcomes with conventional cytotoxic chemotherapy remain limited. The integration of targeted therapies has substantially reshaped treatment paradigms by exploiting key molecular pathways involved in angiogenesis, DNA damage repair, and folate receptor signaling. This review synthesizes evidence from pivotal phase II and III clinical trials, translational studies, and meta-analyses evaluating inhibition of the VEGF, PARP, and folate receptor-alpha (FRα) pathways, with a focus on bevacizumab, rucaparib, and mirvetuximab soravtansine. Across disease settings, these agents have demonstrated clinically meaningful improvements in progression-free survival, durability of response, and tolerability when deployed in biomarker-selected populations. Bevacizumab has shown consistent benefit when combined with platinum-based chemotherapy and as maintenance therapy in advanced disease. PARP inhibitors, including rucaparib, exploit homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) to induce synthetic lethality and are now central to frontline and recurrent treatment strategies for BRCA-mutated and HRD-positive tumors. Mirvetuximab soravtansine has emerged as an effective and well-tolerated option for patients with FRα-high, platinum-resistant ovarian cancer, addressing a longstanding unmet clinical need. Collectively, VEGF-, PARP-, and FRα-targeted therapies have enabled more rational treatment sequencing, informed combination strategies, and personalized clinical decision-making in ovarian cancer. Ongoing efforts to define optimal sequencing, overcome acquired resistance, and refine predictive biomarkers are expected to further enhance the durability and breadth of benefit from targeted therapies and advance precision oncology in gynecologic malignancies. Full article

Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is an aggressive hematologic malignancy characterized by the clonal proliferation of myeloid precursors and rapid progression. Historically consisting of intensive chemotherapy, AML management has evolved significantly due to advances in molecular diagnostics and risk stratification. This review discusses current therapeutic paradigms in AML, emphasizing the growing role of personalized medicine across age and risk groups. For younger, fit patients, intensive regimens such as the “7 + 3” protocol remain the standard, often enhanced by targeted agents like FMS-like tyrosine kinase 3 (FLT3) and IDH inhibitors. Older or unfit individuals benefit from low-intensity treatments such as hypomethylating agents combined with venetoclax, now considered a frontline standard of care. The use of liposomal chemotherapy (CPX-351), measurable residual disease (MRD) monitoring, and maintenance therapy further refine post-remission strategies. Emerging therapies, including menin inhibitors, antibody–drug conjugates, and immunotherapies like CAR-T cells and vaccines, offer additional options, especially in relapsed/refractory settings. This comprehensive review outlines the current landscape and future directions in AML therapy, emphasizing the transition toward individualized, mutation-driven treatment strategies. Full article

Ovarian cancer is the most lethal gynecologic malignancy, which causes 313,959 new cases and 207,252 deaths worldwide annually. The lack of specific symptoms, together with no effective screening tools, results in 75% of patients receiving their diagnosis at an advanced stage. The combination of cytoreductive surgery with platinum-based chemotherapy plays a pivotal role in the treatment of advanced epithelial ovarian cancer, but patients still experience poor long-term survival because of frequent relapses and chemotherapy resistance. The treatment landscape has evolved because bevacizumab and Poly-ADP Ribose Polymerase inhibitors now serve as frontline and maintenance therapies for homologous recombination-deficient tumors. Treatment decisions for recurrent disease depend on platinum sensitivity assessment, which determines the appropriate therapeutic approach, while targeted agents deliver significant benefits to specific patient groups. The development of antibody-drug conjugates such as mirvetuximab soravtansine and immunotherapy, including checkpoint inhibitors and cancer vaccines, demonstrates promising investigative potential. The precision of therapy improves through the use of emerging biomarkers and molecular profiling techniques. The future management of this disease may change because of innovative approaches that include adoptive cell therapy, cytokine therapy, and oncolytic viruses. The progress made in ovarian cancer treatment still faces challenges when it comes to drug resistance, survival improvement, and life quality preservation. The development of translational research alongside clinical trials remains essential to bridge treatment gaps while creating personalized therapies based on molecular and clinical tumor characteristics. Full article

Background: In the randomized, phase-3 IKEMA trial, the triplet isatuximab, carfilzomib, and dexamethasone (IsaKd) demonstrated superior clinical benefit compared to those of carfilzomib and dexamethasone alone in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma after 1–3 prior treatments. Methods: Our real-world, AENEID study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of IsaKd in patients who relapsed after frontline lenalidomide treatment, poorly represented in the IKEMA trial. Specifically, in the present multicenter analysis, we enrolled eighty-two patients who received, between April 2022 and September 2024 and outside of clinical trials, at least one cycle of IsaKd as a second-line treatment at the first relapse after induction therapy, autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT), and lenalidomide maintenance. Results: After a median follow-up time of 12.9 months (range, 1–77), the overall response rate, at least a very good partial response rate, and median progression-free survival time were 79.3%, 56.1%, and 24.4 months, respectively. This slightly lower performance compared to that in the IKEMA study may be attributed to the well-known poor prognostic impact of lenalidomide refractoriness (len-R), developed by all our patients during maintenance therapy, and to a higher proportion of patients with extramedullary disease present in our series, which was identified as the only factor significantly affecting the PFS in multivariable analysis. The median overall survival was not reached, as in the pivotal trial, while the 1-year survival probability was 85.1%. Regarding the safety profile, our findings were consistent with those of the IKEMA trial, with no new safety signals reported. Conclusions: These real-world data support the use of IsaKd as a valuable option for len-R MM patients relapsing after the first-line therapy, including ASCT and lenalidomide maintenance. Full article

The therapeutic landscape for multiple myeloma has gradually expanded in recent decades, leading to unprecedented deep and sustained responses as well as remarkable improvements in patient survival. Nonetheless, changes in treatment algorithms have raised new demands for patients with relapsed/refractory disease, as prior exposure and refractoriness to prior therapies impact the choice of subsequent treatments. In particular, refractoriness to lenalidomide—an established backbone of treatment in both front-line and maintenance settings and a key component of many approved regimens used in relapsed disease—is associated with suboptimal clinical outcomes. Therefore, identifying the most appropriate management in lenalidomide-refractory patients, and even more so in patients who are refractory to more than one agent, is critical. At present, treatment options for this growing subgroup of patients are still limited; however, recent data from clinical research are promising. Herein, we summarized the currently available treatment options and discuss future directions based on the latest results from ongoing clinical trials. Full article

Background: The location of BRCA mutations within functional domains may affect sensitivity to poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors and platinum-based chemotherapy. This study aimed to evaluate the progression-free survival (PFS) benefit from the PARP inhibitor in relation to the location of mutations in BRCA1/BRCA2 in newly diagnosed ovarian cancer. Materials and methods: Patients with advanced stage III-IV epithelial ovarian cancer who had deleterious BRCA1 or BRCA2 were analyzed. PFS and clinical and molecular data were compared between patients who received olaparib or niraparib as frontline maintenance therapy and those who did not. Subgroup analyses were conducted based on the location of BRCA mutations within the functional domain or the ovarian cancer cluster region (OCCR). Results: Of the 380 patients, 242 (63.7%) harbored BRCA1 mutation, 137 (36.1%) harbored BRCA2, and one (0.3%) harbored both BRCA1 and BRCA2. With a median follow-up of 35.8 months, the DNA binding domain in BRCA1 (HR, 0.34; 95% CI, 0.15–0.79; p = 0.01) and BRCA2 (HR, 0.25; 95% CI, 0.08–0.78; p = 0.01) demonstrated particularly significant benefit. In patients who harbored BRCA1 mutation in the C-terminal domain (BRCT), no statistically significant PFS benefit from PARP inhibitor was observed (HR, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.39–1.52; p = 0.44). PFS benefit from PARP inhibitor maintenance was observed in both OCCR (HR, 0.49; 95% CI, 0.32–0.74; p < 0.01) and non-OCCR (HR, 0.51; 95% CI, 0.27–0.63; p < 0.01). Conclusions: Frontline PARP inhibitor maintenance therapy demonstrated a significant PFS benefit in patients with BRCA1/2 mutations, with particularly pronounced benefits for those with mutations located in the DBD of BRCA1 and BRCA2. However, the benefit was less evident for patients with BRCA1 mutations located in the BRCT domain. Full article

Background: Identifying patients with gBRCAm is crucial to facilitate screening strategies, preventive measures and the usage of targeted therapeutics in their management. This review examines the evidence for the latest predictive and therapeutic approaches in BRCA-associated cancers. Clinical Description: Data supports the use of adjuvant olaparib in patients with gBRCAm high-risk HER2-negative breast cancer. In advanced gBRCAm HER2-negative breast cancer, the PARPis talazoparib and olaparib have demonstrated benefit over standard chemotherapy. In ovarian cancer, olaparib, niraparib or rucaparib can be used as monotherapy in frontline maintenance. Olaparib and bevacizumab as a combination can also be used as frontline maintenance. In the relapsed platinum-sensitive setting, olaparib, niraparib and rucaparib are effective maintenance options in BRCAm patients who are PARPi naive. Both olaparib and rucaparib are effective options in BRCAm metastatic castrate-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). Evidence also exists for the benefit of PARPi combinations in mCRPC. In metastatic pancreatic cancer, olaparib can be used in gBRCAm patients who are responding to platinum chemotherapy. However, there may be a development of PARPi resistance. Understanding the pathophysiology that contributes to such resistance may allow the development of novel therapeutics. Combination therapy appears to have promising results in emerging trials. Seeking avenues for subsidised genetic testing can reduce the total costs of cancer management, leading to improve detection rates. Conclusion: Identifying breast, ovarian, pancreatic and prostate cancer patients with gBRCAm plays a crucial predictive role in selecting those who will benefit significantly from PARPi therapy. The use of PARPi in gBRCAm HBOC-related cancers has resulted in significant survival benefits. Beyond BRCA1/2, HRR gene assessment and the consideration of other cancer predisposition syndromes may allow more patients to be eligible for and benefit from targeted therapies. Full article

Purpose: In this study, we aimed to retrospectively investigate the real-world clinical efficacy and adverse events of poly(adenosine diphosphate [ADP]-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors in real-world clinical practice among patients with newly diagnosed epithelial ovarian cancer. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records from hospitals. Patients with epithelial ovarian cancer treated with olaparib or niraparib as frontline maintenance treatment between 1 January 2014 and 31 December 2022 were included. Progression-free survival (PFS) was analyzed using the Kaplan–Meier method, and adverse events associated with PARP inhibitor treatment were investigated. Results: Ninety-six patients treated with PARP inhibitors were identified. The median follow-up period was 21.8 months (95% confidence interval [CI] 19.4–24.0). Twenty (20.1%) patients experienced disease progression, and two patients died. The median PFS was 45.3 months (95% CI 39.4–NA). BRCA1 or BRCA2 gene mutations and primary cytoreductive surgery were associated with better PFS. Adverse events of any grade occurred in 74 (77.1%) patients. Nineteen (19.8%) patients experienced PARP inhibitor therapy interruptions, and 35 (36.5%) patients experienced dose reductions. Only three patients discontinued the drug due to adverse events. Conclusions: In a real-world setting, PARP inhibitors showed efficacy comparable to that reported in published randomized controlled trials and had acceptable safety profiles. Full article

Background: This multicenter retrospective study aimed to investigate the prognostic value of the CA-125 elimination rate constant K (KELIM) in EOC patients who received platinum-based chemotherapy followed by PARP inhibitors, in either upfront or interval treatment settings. Methods: Between July 2019 and November 2022, we identified stage III–IV EOC patients who underwent primary or interval cytoreductive surgery and received olaparib or niraparib. Individual KELIM values were assessed based on validated kinetics and classified into favorable and unfavorable cohorts. Results: In a study of 252 patients undergoing frontline maintenance therapy with olaparib or niraparib, favorable KELIM (≥1) scores were associated with a higher PFS benefit in the primary cytoreductive surgery (PCS) cohort (hazard ratio (HR) for disease progression or death 3.51, 95% confidence interval (CI); 1.37–8.97, p = 0.009). Additionally, within the interval cytoreductive surgery (ICS) cohort, a favorable KELIM score (≥1) significantly increased the likelihood of achieving complete resection following cytoreductive surgery, with 59.4% in the favorable KELIM group compared to 37.8% in those with unfavorable KELIM. Conclusions: A favorable KELIM score was associated with improved PFS in patients with advanced EOC undergoing PCS. Furthermore, in the ICS cohort, a favorable KELIM score increased the probability of complete cytoreduction. Full article

Rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (R-CHOP) and R-bendamustine (R-B) are the most common frontline treatment strategies for advanced-stage follicular lymphoma (FL). After R-CHOP induction therapy, using rituximab for maintenance therapy notably improves outcomes; however, whether this can be achieved by using the same approach after R-B therapy is still being determined. This retrospective analysis compared 476 FL patients from 17 GELTAMO centers who received R-based regimens followed by rituximab maintenance therapy for untreated advanced-stage FL. The complete response rate at the end of induction was higher with R-B and relapses were more frequent with R-CHOP. During induction, cytopenias were significantly more frequent with R-CHOP and so was the use of colony-stimulating factors. During maintenance therapy, R-B showed more neutropenia and infectious toxicity. After a median follow-up of 81 months (95% CI: 77–86), the 6-year rates of progression-free survival (PFS) were 79% (95% CI: 72–86) for R-bendamustine vs. 67% (95% CI: 61–73) for R-CHOP (p = 0.046), and 6-year overall survival (OS) values were 91% (95% CI: 86–96) for R-B vs. 91% (95% CI: 87–94) for R-CHOP (p = 0.49). In conclusion, R-B followed by rituximab maintenance therapy in patients with previously untreated FL resulted in significantly longer PFS than R-CHOP, with older patients also benefiting from this treatment without further toxicity. Adverse events during maintenance were more frequent with R-B without impacting mortality. Full article

The Frontline and Relapsed Rhabdomyosarcoma (FaR-RMS) clinical trial is an overarching, multinational study for children and adults with rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS). The trial, developed by the European Soft Tissue Sarcoma Study Group (EpSSG), incorporates multiple different research questions within a multistage design with a focus on (i) novel regimens for poor prognostic subgroups, (ii) optimal duration of maintenance chemotherapy, and (iii) optimal use of radiotherapy for local control and widespread metastatic disease. Additional sub-studies focusing on biological risk stratification, use of imaging modalities, including [¹⁸F]FDG PET-CT and diffusion-weighted MRI imaging (DWI) as prognostic markers, and impact of therapy on quality of life are described. This paper forms part of a Special Issue on rhabdomyosarcoma and outlines the study background, rationale for randomisations and sub-studies, design, and plans for utilisation and dissemination of results. Full article