Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (53)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = esophagogastric junction

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
14 pages, 340 KiB  
Article
FLOT Versus CROSS—What Is the Optimal Therapeutic Approach for Locally Advanced Adenocarcinoma of the Esophagus and the Esophagogastric Junction?
by Martin Leu, Hannes Mahler, Johanna Reinecke, Ute Margarethe König, Leif Hendrik Dröge, Manuel Guhlich, Benjamin Steuber, Marian Grade, Michael Ghadimi, Volker Ellenrieder, Stefan Rieken and Alexander Otto König
Cancers 2025, 17(15), 2587; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers17152587 - 6 Aug 2025
Abstract
Background/Objectives: Neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy and perioperative chemotherapy are both well-established treatment strategies for locally advanced adenocarcinoma of the esophagus (EAC) and the esophagogastric junction (AEGJ). However, recent knowledge controversially discusses whether neoadjuvant radiotherapy or perioperative chemotherapy represents superior therapeutic options to prolong survival or [...] Read more.
Background/Objectives: Neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy and perioperative chemotherapy are both well-established treatment strategies for locally advanced adenocarcinoma of the esophagus (EAC) and the esophagogastric junction (AEGJ). However, recent knowledge controversially discusses whether neoadjuvant radiotherapy or perioperative chemotherapy represents superior therapeutic options to prolong survival or cause less toxicity. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 76 patients with locally advanced EAC or AEGJ treated at our tertiary cancer center between January 2015 and March 2023. Patients received either perioperative FLOT chemotherapy (n = 36) or neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy following the CROSS protocol (n = 40), followed by surgical resection and standardized follow-up. We compared survival outcomes, toxicity profiles, treatment compliance, and surgical results between the two groups. Results: There were no statistically significant differences between FLOT and CROSS treatments in five-year loco-regional controls (LRC: 61.5% vs. 68.6%; p = 0.81), progression-free survival (PFS: 33.9% vs. 42.8%; p = 0.82), overall survival (OS: 60.2% vs. 63.4%; p = 0.91), or distant controls (DC: 42.1% vs. 56.5%; p = 0.39). High-grade hematologic toxicities did not significantly differ between groups (p > 0.05). Treatment compliance was lower in the FLOT group, with 50% (18/36) not completing all the planned chemotherapy cycles, compared to 17.5% (7/40) in the CROSS group. All the patients in the CROSS group received the full radiotherapy dose. Surgical outcomes and post-surgical tumor status were comparable between the groups. Conclusions: Although perioperative chemotherapy with FLOT has recently become a standard of care for locally advanced EAC and AEGJ, neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy per the CROSS protocol remains a well-tolerated alternative. In appropriately selected patients, both approaches yield comparable oncological outcomes. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Current Treatments of Esophageal and Esophagogastric Junction Cancers)
Show Figures

Figure 1

11 pages, 422 KiB  
Review
An Overview of the Treatment Strategy of Esophagogastric Junction Cancer
by Masatoshi Nakagawa, Masanobu Nakajima, Masaki Yoshimatsu, Yu Ueta, Noboru Inoue, Takahiro Ochiai, Shuhei Takise, Junki Fujita, Shinji Morita and Kazuyuki Kojima
Cancers 2025, 17(12), 1961; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers17121961 - 12 Jun 2025
Viewed by 541
Abstract
Background: The incidence of esophagogastric junction cancer (EGJC) is increasing in both Western and Eastern countries. Despite this trend, a globally accepted treatment strategy remains elusive due to the tumor’s anatomical complexity and variability in clinical practice. Aim: This review aims to provide [...] Read more.
Background: The incidence of esophagogastric junction cancer (EGJC) is increasing in both Western and Eastern countries. Despite this trend, a globally accepted treatment strategy remains elusive due to the tumor’s anatomical complexity and variability in clinical practice. Aim: This review aims to provide a comprehensive overview of current evidence regarding EGJC treatment, focusing on the surgical approach, extent of lymph node dissection, and perioperative therapy. Special attention is given to regional differences and the implications of recent clinical trials. Findings: Transhiatal and minimally invasive surgical approaches have demonstrated favorable safety profiles, particularly for Siewert type II tumors. Lymph node dissection strategies are increasingly tailored based on the extent of esophageal invasion. Pre- and postoperative chemotherapy and chemoradiotherapy are standard in the West, while East Asian countries are gradually adopting these approaches through trials such as RESOLVE (China) and PRODIGY (Korea). Immunotherapy has also emerged as a promising option following the CheckMate 577 trial. Conclusions: EGJC requires individualized treatment planning based on tumor characteristics and regional practices. While ongoing trials continue to inform optimal management, international collaboration and a stepwise, biomarker-informed approach will be essential to harmonize treatment strategies for this anatomically and therapeutically complex disease. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Current Treatments of Esophageal and Esophagogastric Junction Cancers)
Show Figures

Figure 1

21 pages, 8861 KiB  
Article
Oligometastatic Mixed Neuroendocrine Adenocarcinoma of the Esophago-Gastric Junction: A Case of Successful Multidisciplinary Management, the Lessons Learnt and Review of the Literature
by Anastasia Sotiropoulou, Maria Avgoustidou, Vassilis Milionis, Ioannis Papadimitriou, Chrysovalantis Vergadis, Dimitrios Schizas, Nikolaos Arkadopoulos and Orestis Lyros
J. Clin. Med. 2025, 14(5), 1503; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14051503 - 24 Feb 2025
Viewed by 665
Abstract
Background: Mixed neuroendocrine–non-neuroendocrine neoplasms (MiNENs) of the esophago-gastric junction (EGJ) are rare aggressive malignant neoplasms, with, currently, limited evidence regarding the appropriate therapeutic approach. Methods: Herein, we report multimodal treatment management of a patient with oligometastatic MiNEN of EGJ (Siewert III), discuss the [...] Read more.
Background: Mixed neuroendocrine–non-neuroendocrine neoplasms (MiNENs) of the esophago-gastric junction (EGJ) are rare aggressive malignant neoplasms, with, currently, limited evidence regarding the appropriate therapeutic approach. Methods: Herein, we report multimodal treatment management of a patient with oligometastatic MiNEN of EGJ (Siewert III), discuss the lessons learnt, and provide a review of the literature. Results: A 69-year-old female was diagnosed with a locally advanced EGJ tumor and three liver metastases (cT4, cN+, M1). Although the initial histology from biopsy revealed adenocarcinoma, the histopathology of a lymph node biopsy from staging laparoscopy revealed infiltration of neuroendocrine carcinoma cells. Thus, the diagnosis of a mixed neuroendocrine adenocarcinoma was set, and systemic chemotherapy with etoposide and cisplatin was initiated. A major clinical response led to conversion surgical resection of the primary tumor and metastases, followed by adjuvant therapy with immunotherapy. The patient is free of disease at the 3-year follow-up. A review of the literature on similar cases of EGJ or gastric MiNENs revealed a limited number of cases. Out of the 39 patients, 20 of them (51.3%) suffered from advanced-stage disease. The MiNEN diagnosis typically occurred after surgical resection. Systemic chemotherapy against the neuroendocrine component demonstrated significant response rates, while in cases in which conversion surgery was offered, prolongation of survival was demonstrated. Conclusions: Our case and the existing literature on MiNENs of EGJ underline the need for a personalized treatment approach following thorough interpretation of comprehensive pretherapeutic staging. Conversion radical surgery with curative intent could be considered in cases of major or complete clinical response to induction chemotherapy with potentially favorable outcomes. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

13 pages, 2787 KiB  
Protocol
Feasibility of Detecting Fluorescent Marking Clip with Novel Fluorescence Detection System in Minimally Invasive Stomach and Esophageal Surgery
by Hideyuki Wada, Yuma Ebihara, Hironobu Takano, Mariko Hayashi, Takeo Nitta, Toshiaki Shichinohe and Satoshi Hirano
J. Clin. Med. 2025, 14(3), 717; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14030717 - 23 Jan 2025
Viewed by 830
Abstract
Background: Determining the optimal resection line for an organ that cannot be palpated is crucial, but challenging, in minimally invasive gastrointestinal (GI) surgery. Therefore, there is an urgent need to establish the most effective method for tumor localization. We hypothesize that our [...] Read more.
Background: Determining the optimal resection line for an organ that cannot be palpated is crucial, but challenging, in minimally invasive gastrointestinal (GI) surgery. Therefore, there is an urgent need to establish the most effective method for tumor localization. We hypothesize that our novel near-infrared (NIR) fluorescence detection system will enable the highly accurate detection of fluorescent clips marking GI cancer. Methods: Twenty-five patients with gastric cancer, esophagogastric junctional cancer, or esophageal cancer will be enrolled. NIR fluorescent clips will be placed endoscopically around the tumor on the day before surgery. Patients in whom clip dislodgement is confirmed by preoperative abdominal radiography will be excluded. The clips will be placed before the transection of the organ, and those on the surgical specimen will be observed after transection using both the novel NIR fluorescence detection system and an existing NIR fluorescence imaging system. The detection rate and time, the fluorescence intensity, surgical margins, and adverse events will be evaluated. This study has been registered in the Japan Registry of Clinical Trials, with the code jRCTs012240043. (Expected) Results: As the novel fluorescence detection system allows for higher-sensitivity detection by analyzing the spectral characteristics of fluorescence and measuring the peak values, we anticipate that this new system will detect the fluorescent clips with high accuracy. Conclusions: This study aims to establish a novel tumor-marking method using fluorescent clips and a new detection system that can be easily applied in various medical facilities. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section General Surgery)
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

16 pages, 7392 KiB  
Article
Pre-Surgical Endoscopic Biopsies Are Representative of Esophageal and Esophago-Gastric Junction Adenocarcinoma Histologic Classes and Survival Risk
by Alessandro Gambella, Roberto Fiocca, Marialuisa Lugaresi, Antonietta D’Errico, Deborah Malvi, Paola Spaggiari, Anna Tomezzoli, Luca Albarello, Ari Ristimäki, Luca Bottiglieri, Elena Bonora, Kausilia K. Krishnadath, Gian Domenico Raulli, Riccardo Rosati, Uberto Fumagalli Romario, Giovanni De Manzoni, Jari Räsänen, Sandro Mattioli, Federica Grillo and Luca Mastracci
Cancers 2024, 16(23), 4045; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers16234045 - 2 Dec 2024
Viewed by 1124
Abstract
Background and Objectives: The Esophageal Adenocarcinoma Study Group Europe (EACSGE) recently proposed a granular histologic classification of esophageal–esophago-gastric junctional adenocarcinomas (EA-EGJAs) based on the study of naïve surgically resected specimens that, when combined with the pTNM stage, is an efficient indicator of prognosis, [...] Read more.
Background and Objectives: The Esophageal Adenocarcinoma Study Group Europe (EACSGE) recently proposed a granular histologic classification of esophageal–esophago-gastric junctional adenocarcinomas (EA-EGJAs) based on the study of naïve surgically resected specimens that, when combined with the pTNM stage, is an efficient indicator of prognosis, molecular events, and response to treatment. In this study, we compared histologic classes of endoscopic biopsies taken before surgical resection with those of the surgical specimen, to evaluate the potential of the EACSGE classification at the initial diagnostic workup. Methods: A total of 106 EA-EGJA cases with available endoscopic biopsies and matched surgical resection specimens were retrieved from five Italian institutions. Histologic classification was performed on all specimens to identify well-differentiated glandular adenocarcinoma (WD-GAC), poorly differentiated glandular adenocarcinoma (PD-GAC), mucinous muconodular carcinoma (MMC), infiltrative mucinous carcinoma (IMC), diffuse desmoplastic carcinoma, diffuse anaplastic carcinoma (DAC), and mixed subtypes. Related risk subgroups (low-risk versus high-risk) were also assessed. The correlations of histologic classes and risk subgroups between diagnostic biopsies and surgical resection specimens were explored with Spearman’s correlation test. Sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, true positives, true negatives, false positives, and false negatives were also calculated. Results: A strong positive correlation between biopsies and surgical specimens occurred for both histologic classes (coefficient: 0.75, p < 0.001) and risk subgroups (coefficient: 0.65, p < 0.001). The highest sensitivities and specificities were observed for MMC, IMC, and DAC (100% and 99% for all), followed by WD-GAC (sensitivity 91%, specificity 79%) and PD-GAC (sensitivity 722%, specificity 86%). The low-risk and high-risk groups presented a sensitivity and specificity of 89% and 76% (low-risk) and 76% and 89% (high-risk). Conclusions: The EACSGE histologic classification of EA-EGJAs and associated prognostic subgroups can be reliably assessed on pre-operative diagnostic biopsies. Further studies on larger and more representative cohorts of EA-EGJAs will allow us to validate our findings and confirm if the EA-EGJA biopsy histomorphology and clinical TNM staging will be as efficient as the surgical specimen histomorphology and pTNM in predicting patient prognoses and tailoring personalized therapeutic approaches. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Cancer Causes, Screening and Diagnosis)
Show Figures

Figure 1

12 pages, 1380 KiB  
Article
Tumor-Infiltrating Lymphocytes in Resected Esophageal and Gastric Adenocarcinomas Do Not Correlate with Tumor Regression Score After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy: Results of a Case-Series Study
by Fotios Seretis, Chrysoula Glava, Spyridon Smparounis, Dimitra Riga, Georgios Karantzikos, Maria Theochari, Dimitrios Theodorou and Tania Triantafyllou
Cancers 2024, 16(21), 3694; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers16213694 - 1 Nov 2024
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1292
Abstract
Background/Objectives: Adenocarcinomas of the esophagogastric junction and stomach present clinical entities with significant cancer-related morbidity and mortality, often requiring multimodal treatments. Preoperative chemotherapy, mainly the FLOT regimen, is increasingly being utilized in the neoadjuvant setting for the treatment of these malignancies, with [...] Read more.
Background/Objectives: Adenocarcinomas of the esophagogastric junction and stomach present clinical entities with significant cancer-related morbidity and mortality, often requiring multimodal treatments. Preoperative chemotherapy, mainly the FLOT regimen, is increasingly being utilized in the neoadjuvant setting for the treatment of these malignancies, with varying degrees of tumor response. Methods: We conducted a retrospective, single-institution review on 75 patients operated on for adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction and stomach after neoadjuvant FLOT. We investigated whether tumor response correlates with disease response in lymph nodes examined on surgical specimens. We also investigated the role of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) in correlation with primary tumor response and disease response in lymph nodes on pathological specimens. Results: Our results suggest that TILs correlate in a differential manner with regards to primary tumors versus lymph nodes, thus suggesting that there are different biologic processes in place. Conclusions: Our results provide unique evidence on tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes in the adenocarcinoma histology of the esophagogastric junction and stomach and might be important for further studies. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue New Insights in the Management of Resectable Esophageal Malignancy)
Show Figures

Figure 1

10 pages, 8499 KiB  
Case Report
Use of 18-Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography and Near-Infrared Fluorescence-Guided Imaging Surgery in the Treatment of a Gastric Tumor in a Dog
by Su-Hyeon Kim, Yeon Chae, Byeong-Teck Kang and Sungin Lee
Animals 2024, 14(20), 2917; https://doi.org/10.3390/ani14202917 - 10 Oct 2024
Viewed by 1559
Abstract
A 13-year-old Maltese dog with an abdominal mass underwent 18F-FDG PET/computed tomography (CT) for tumor localization and metastatic evaluation. PET/CT scans revealed a gastric mass near the esophagogastric junction and demonstrated mean and maximum standardized uptake values (SUVs) of 4.596 and 6.234, respectively, [...] Read more.
A 13-year-old Maltese dog with an abdominal mass underwent 18F-FDG PET/computed tomography (CT) for tumor localization and metastatic evaluation. PET/CT scans revealed a gastric mass near the esophagogastric junction and demonstrated mean and maximum standardized uptake values (SUVs) of 4.596 and 6.234, respectively, for the abdominal mass. Subsequent surgery incorporated ICG for NIR fluorescence-guided imaging, aiding in precise tumor localization and margin assessment. The excised mass was identified as a low-grade leiomyosarcoma on histopathology. The dog underwent PET/CT imaging six months postoperatively following the excision of the mass, which confirmed the absence of recurrence or residual lesions during follow-up. NIR fluorescence imaging using ICG demonstrated efficacy in real-time tumor visualization and margin assessment, a technique not previously reported in veterinary literature. The PET/CT findings complemented the diagnosis and provided valuable insights into metastasis. The absence of recurrence or complications in postoperative follow-up underscores the potential of these imaging modalities in enhancing surgical precision and improving prognosis in canine gastric tumors. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Image-Guided Veterinary Surgery)
Show Figures

Figure 1

10 pages, 857 KiB  
Article
Sedation and Endoscopy-Assisted High-Resolution Manometry (SEA-HRM) in Patients Who Previously Failed Standard Esophageal Manometry
by Daniel L. Cohen, Eyal Avivi, Sergei Vosko, Vered Richter, Haim Shirin and Anton Bermont
Diagnostics 2024, 14(19), 2232; https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics14192232 - 6 Oct 2024
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 1710
Abstract
Objectives: Esophageal high-resolution manometry (HRM) is the gold standard for diagnosing esophageal motility disorders, but it may be poorly tolerated and unsuccessful. We sought to evaluate a protocol for sedation and endoscopy-assisted (SEA) HRM in patients who previously failed standard HRM and assess [...] Read more.
Objectives: Esophageal high-resolution manometry (HRM) is the gold standard for diagnosing esophageal motility disorders, but it may be poorly tolerated and unsuccessful. We sought to evaluate a protocol for sedation and endoscopy-assisted (SEA) HRM in patients who previously failed standard HRM and assess patient perspectives towards it. Methods: Adult patients who previously failed HRM were prospectively enrolled. Under propofol sedation, an upper endoscopy was performed during which the HRM catheter was advanced under endoscopic visualization. If the catheter did not reach the stomach on its own, the endoscope itself or a snare was used to help it traverse the esophagogastric junction (EGJ). Results: Thirty patients participated (mean age 67.8, 70% female). The technical success of SEA-HRM was 100%. Twenty-two (73.3%) were diagnosed with a motility disorder including thirteen (43.3%) with achalasia. Eighteen (60%) had previously failed HRM due to discomfort/intolerance, while twelve (40%) failed due to catheter coiling in the esophagus. Subjects in the coiling group were more likely to need endoscopic assistance to traverse the EGJ (91.7% vs. 27.7%, p = 0.001) and have a motility disorder (100.0% vs. 55.6%, p = 0.010), including achalasia (75.0% vs. 22.2%, p = 0.004), compared to the discomfort/intolerance group. All patients preferred SEA-HRM and rated it higher than standard HRM (9.5 ± 1.3 vs. 1.9 ± 2.1, p = <0.001, on a scale of 1–10). Conclusions: SEA-HRM is a highly successful and well-tolerated option in patients who previously failed standard HRM. This should be the recommended approach in cases of failed HRM rather than secondary tests of esophageal motility. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Gastrointestinal Motility Disorders: Diagnosis and Management)
Show Figures

Figure 1

15 pages, 1039 KiB  
Review
Systemic Therapy of Gastric Cancer—State of the Art and Future Perspectives
by Florian Lordick, Sun Young Rha, Kei Muro, Wei Peng Yong and Radka Lordick Obermannová
Cancers 2024, 16(19), 3337; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers16193337 - 29 Sep 2024
Cited by 9 | Viewed by 3291
Abstract
Background: The prognosis of patients diagnosed with locally advanced and metastatic gastric and esophago-gastric junction cancer is critical. The optimal choice of systemic therapy is essential to optimize survival outcomes. Methods: A comprehensive literature review via PubMed and analysis of major oncology [...] Read more.
Background: The prognosis of patients diagnosed with locally advanced and metastatic gastric and esophago-gastric junction cancer is critical. The optimal choice of systemic therapy is essential to optimize survival outcomes. Methods: A comprehensive literature review via PubMed and analysis of major oncology congresses (European Society for Medical Oncology and American Society of Clinical Oncology websites) were conducted to ascertain the current status and latest developments in the systemic treatment of patients with localized or advanced gastric and esophago-gastric junction adenocarcinoma. Results: While neoadjuvant and perioperative chemotherapy for localized tumor stages is the preferred approach in the Western Hemisphere, adjuvant chemotherapy remains the preferred course of action in East Asia. The administration of chemotherapy, typically in the form of combinations comprising platinum and fluoropyrimidine compounds in combination with docetaxel, represents a standard of care. Investigations are underway into the potential of immunotherapy and other biologically targeted agents in the perioperative setting. To select the most appropriate therapy for advanced gastric cancer, including adenocarcinoma of the esophago-gastric junction, it is essential to determine biomarkers such as HER2 expression, PD-L1 combined positive score (CPS) (combined positive score), Claudin 18.2, and microsatellite instability (MSI). In the present clinical context, the standard first-line therapy is a combination of fluoropyrimidine and a platinum derivative. The selection of chemotherapy in combination with antibodies is contingent upon the specific biomarker under consideration. Conclusions: This article reviews the current state of the art based on recent clinical trial results and provides an outlook on the future of systemic therapy. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Gastric Cancer: Evolving Landscape and Emerging Therapies)
Show Figures

Figure 1

11 pages, 472 KiB  
Article
Comparative Prevalence of Ineffective Esophageal Motility: Impact of Chicago v4.0 vs. v3.0 Criteria
by Teodora Surdea-Blaga, Stefan-Lucian Popa, Cristina Maria Sabo, Radu Alexandru Fărcaş, Liliana David, Abdulrahman Ismaiel, Dan Lucian Dumitrascu, Simona Grad and Daniel Corneliu Leucuta
Medicina 2024, 60(9), 1469; https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina60091469 - 8 Sep 2024
Viewed by 1549
Abstract
Background and Objectives: The threshold for ineffective esophageal motility (IEM) diagnosis was changed in Chicago v4.0. Our aim was to determine IEM prevalence using the new criteria and the differences between patients with definite IEM versus “inconclusive diagnosis”. Materials and Methods: [...] Read more.
Background and Objectives: The threshold for ineffective esophageal motility (IEM) diagnosis was changed in Chicago v4.0. Our aim was to determine IEM prevalence using the new criteria and the differences between patients with definite IEM versus “inconclusive diagnosis”. Materials and Methods: We retrospectively selected IEM and fragmented peristalsis (FP) patients from the high-resolution esophageal manometries (HREMs) database. Clinical, demographic data and manometric parameters were recorded. Results: Of 348 HREMs analyzed using Chicago v3.0, 12.3% of patients had IEM and 0.86% had FP. Using Chicago v4.0, 8.9% of patients had IEM (IEM-4 group). We compared them with the remaining 16 with an inconclusive diagnosis of IEM (borderline group). Dysphagia (77% vs. 44%, Z-test = 2.3, p = 0.02) and weight loss were more commonly observed in IEM-4 compared to the borderline group. The reflux symptoms were more prevalent in the borderline group (87.5% vs. 70.9%, p = 0.2). Type 2 or 3 esophagogastric junction morphology was more prevalent in the borderline group (81.2%) vs. 64.5% in IEM-4 (p = 0.23). Distal contractile integral (DCI) was lower in IEM-4 vs. the borderline group, and resting lower esophageal sphincter (LES) pressure and mean integrated relaxation pressure (IRP) were similar. The number of ineffective swallows and failed swallows was higher in IEM-4 compared to the borderline group. Conclusions: Using Chicago v4.0, less than 10% of patients had a definite diagnosis of IEM. The dominant symptom was dysphagia. Only DCI and the number of failed and inefficient swallows were different between definite IEM patients and borderline cases. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease and Esophageal Motility Disorders)
Show Figures

Figure 1

19 pages, 2966 KiB  
Review
Utilizing Esophageal Motility Tests in Diagnosing and Evaluating Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease
by Wangliu Yang, Yurong Huang, Lei He, Dongmei Chen, Sheng Wu, Yan Tian, Juan Zheng, Jie Yang and Gengqing Song
Diagnostics 2024, 14(14), 1467; https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics14141467 - 9 Jul 2024
Cited by 4 | Viewed by 2517
Abstract
Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), a prevalent clinical condition, is often attributed to aberrant esophageal motility, leading to gastric content reflux and associated symptoms or complications. The rising incidence of GERD presents an escalating healthcare challenge. Endoscopic and esophageal reflux monitoring can provide a [...] Read more.
Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), a prevalent clinical condition, is often attributed to aberrant esophageal motility, leading to gastric content reflux and associated symptoms or complications. The rising incidence of GERD presents an escalating healthcare challenge. Endoscopic and esophageal reflux monitoring can provide a basis for the diagnosis of patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease, but when the diagnostic basis is at an inconclusive value, some additional supportive evidence will be needed. Advanced technology is the key to improving patient diagnosis, accurate assessment, and the development of effective treatment strategies. High-resolution esophageal manometry (HREM) and endoscopic functional lumen imaging probe (EndoFLIP) represent the forefront of esophageal motility assessment. HREM, an evolution of traditional esophageal manometry, is considered the benchmark for identifying esophageal motility disorders. Its widespread application in esophageal dynamics research highlights its diagnostic significance. Concurrently, EndoFLIP’s emerging clinical relevance is evident in diagnosing and guiding the treatment of coexisting esophageal motility issues. This review integrates contemporary research to delineate the contributions of HREM, EndoFLIP, and novel technologies in GERD. It examines their efficacy in facilitating an accurate diagnosis, differentiating similar gastrointestinal disorders, quantifying the extent of reflux, assessing the severity of the disease, forecasting patient responsiveness to proton pump inhibitor therapy, and guiding decisions for surgical interventions. The overarching aim is to deepen the understanding of GERD’s underlying mechanisms and advance the formulation of holistic, efficacious treatment approaches. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

13 pages, 2113 KiB  
Article
Esophageal Self-Expandable Metal Stents Can Fracture in the Distal Third When Used for Post-Bariatric Surgery Complications: A Single Center Experience and Review of the Literature with Video
by Yazan Abboud, Mohamad Othman El Helou, Joseph Meza, Jamil S. Samaan, Liliana Bancila, Navkiran Randhawa, Kenneth H. Park, Shahab Mehdizadeh, Srinivas Gaddam and Simon K. Lo
J. Clin. Med. 2024, 13(12), 3419; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13123419 - 11 Jun 2024
Viewed by 1492
Abstract
Background: Esophageal self-expandable metal stents (SEMS) are an important endoscopic tool. These stents have now been adapted successfully to manage post-bariatric surgery complications such as anastomotic leaks and strictures. In centers of expertise, this has become the primary standard-of-care treatment given its minimally [...] Read more.
Background: Esophageal self-expandable metal stents (SEMS) are an important endoscopic tool. These stents have now been adapted successfully to manage post-bariatric surgery complications such as anastomotic leaks and strictures. In centers of expertise, this has become the primary standard-of-care treatment given its minimally invasive nature, and that it results in early oral feeding, decreased hospitalization, and overall favorable outcomes. Self-expandable metal stents (SEMS) fractures are a rare complication of unknown etiology. We aimed to investigate possible causes of SEMS fractures and highlight a unique endoscopic approach utilized to manage a fractured and impaled SEMS. Methods: This is a retrospective study of consecutive patients who underwent esophageal SEMS placement between 2015–2021 at a tertiary referral center to identify fractured SEMS. Patient demographics, stent characteristics, and possible etiologies of fractured SEMS were identified. A comprehensive literature review was also conducted to evaluate all prior cases of fractured SEMS and to hypothesize fracture theories. Results: There were seven fractured esophageal SEMS, of which six were used to manage post-bariatric surgery complications. Five SEMS were deployed with their distal ends in the gastric antrum and proximal ends in the distal esophagus. All stents fractured within 9 weeks of deployment. Most stents (5/7) were at least 10 cm in length with fractures commonly occurring in the distal third of the stents (6/7). The wires of a fractured SEMS were embedded within the esophagogastric junction in one case, prompting the use of an overtube that was synchronously advanced while steadily extracting the stent. Discussion: We suggest the following four etiologies of SEMS fractures: anatomical, physiological, mechanical, and chemical. Stent curvature at the stomach incisura can lead to strain- and stress-related fatigue due to mechanical bending with exacerbation from respiratory movements. Physiologic factors (gastric body contractions) can result in repetitive squeezing of the stent, adding to metal fatigue. Intrinsic properties (long length and low axial force) may be contributing factors. Lastly, the stomach acidic environment may cause nitinol-induced chemical weakness. Despite the aforementioned theories, SEMS fracture etiology remains unclear. Until more data become available, it may be advisable to remove these stents within 6 weeks. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Recent Advances in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy)
Show Figures

Figure 1

17 pages, 889 KiB  
Review
Textbook Neoadjuvant Outcome—Novel Composite Measure of Oncological Outcomes among Gastric Cancer Patients Undergoing Multimodal Treatment
by Zuzanna Pelc, Katarzyna Sędłak, Magdalena Leśniewska, Katarzyna Mielniczek, Katarzyna Chawrylak, Magdalena Skórzewska, Tomasz Ciszewski, Joanna Czechowska, Agata Kiszczyńska, Bas P. L. Wijnhoven, Johanna W. Van Sandick, Ines Gockel, Suzanne S. Gisbertz, Guillaume Piessen, Clarisse Eveno, Maria Bencivenga, Giovanni De Manzoni, Gian Luca Baiocchi, Paolo Morgagni, Riccardo Rosati, Uberto Fumagalli Romario, Andrew Davies, Yutaka Endo, Timothy M. Pawlik, Franco Roviello, Christiane Bruns, Wojciech P. Polkowski and Karol Rawicz-Pruszyńskiadd Show full author list remove Hide full author list
Cancers 2024, 16(9), 1721; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers16091721 - 28 Apr 2024
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 2277
Abstract
The incidence of gastric cancer (GC) is expected to increase to 1.77 million cases by 2040. To improve treatment outcomes, GC patients are increasingly treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) prior to curative-intent resection. Although NAC enhances locoregional control and comprehensive patient care, survival [...] Read more.
The incidence of gastric cancer (GC) is expected to increase to 1.77 million cases by 2040. To improve treatment outcomes, GC patients are increasingly treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) prior to curative-intent resection. Although NAC enhances locoregional control and comprehensive patient care, survival rates remain poor, and further investigations should establish outcomes assessment of current clinical pathways. Individually assessed parameters have served as benchmarks for treatment quality in the past decades. The Outcome4Medicine Consensus Conference underscores the inadequacy of isolated metrics, leading to increased recognition and adoption of composite measures. One of the most simple and comprehensive is the “All or None” method, which refers to an approach where a specific set of criteria must be fulfilled for an individual to achieve the overall measure. This narrative review aims to present the rationale for the implementation of a novel composite measure, Textbook Neoadjuvant Outcome (TNO). TNO integrates five objective and well-established components: Treatment Toxicity, Laboratory Tests, Imaging, Time to Surgery, and Nutrition. It represents a desired, multidisciplinary care and hospitalization of GC patients undergoing NAC to identify the treatment- and patient-related data required to establish high-quality oncological care further. A key strength of this narrative review is the clinical feasibility and research background supporting the implementation of the first and novel composite measure representing the “ideal” and holistic care among patients with locally advanced esophago-gastric junction (EGJ) and GC in the preoperative period after NAC. Further analysis will correlate clinical outcomes with the prognostic factors evaluated within the TNO framework. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Clinical Research of Cancer)
Show Figures

Figure 1

11 pages, 623 KiB  
Article
A Phase II Study of Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy with Docetaxel, Cisplatin and 5-FU Followed by Surgical Resection in the Treatment of Locally Advanced Esophagogastric Junction Cancer and Locally Advanced Esophageal Cancer
by Chien-Chih Chen, Hui-Ling Yeh, Cheng-Yeh Chuang and Chung-Ping Hsu
Clin. Pract. 2024, 14(2), 642-652; https://doi.org/10.3390/clinpract14020051 - 22 Apr 2024
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1966
Abstract
Purpose: We conducted a phase II study evaluating chemoradiotherapy in patients with advanced esophageal cancer, using the docetaxel, cisplatin, and 5-fluorouracil (DCF) regimen followed by surgery. The primary purposes of this clinical trial were to assess the efficacy and safety of chemoradiotherapy employing [...] Read more.
Purpose: We conducted a phase II study evaluating chemoradiotherapy in patients with advanced esophageal cancer, using the docetaxel, cisplatin, and 5-fluorouracil (DCF) regimen followed by surgery. The primary purposes of this clinical trial were to assess the efficacy and safety of chemoradiotherapy employing the DCF regimen in the treatment of advanced esophageal cancer. Material and methods: We enrolled a total of 24 newly diagnosed esophageal cancer patients between April 2015 and November 2017 in this prospective study. The radiotherapy regimen consisted of a total dose of 45 Gy in 25 fractions. The chemotherapy protocol included docetaxel 35 mg/m2 for 1 h on day 1 and day 29, cisplatin 35 mg/m2 for 1 h on day 1 and day 29, and 5-FU 400 mg/m2 for 24 h on day 1–4 and day 29–32. The patients who accepted the re-staging exam should undergo surgery in 4–8 weeks after the completion of radiotherapy. The primary endpoints of this study were disease-free survival (DFS), overall survival (OS), and the evaluation of hematologic toxicity. Results: The study population had a median age of 55.5 years, ranging from 44 to 66, with over 90% of the patients being male. The 5-year DFS was 37.1%, and the 5-year OS was 48.7%. The pathologic complete response rate was 45.8% (11/24). The most common types of toxicity were leukopenia and thrombocytopenia. No grade 3 or greater hematologic toxicity was reported. Conclusions: The use of the DCF regimen in neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy followed by surgery demonstrated tolerable toxicity and achieved acceptable DFS and OS outcomes. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

31 pages, 1334 KiB  
Article
Genetic Impact of HOTAIR, LINC00951, POLR2E and HULC Polymorphisms in Histopathological and Laboratory Prognostic Factors in Esophageal Cancer in the West: A Case-Control Study
by Efstratia Baili, Maria Gazouli, Andreas C. Lazaris, Prodromos Kanavidis, Maria Boura, Adamantios Michalinos, Alexandros Charalabopoulos, Theodore Liakakos and Andreas Alexandrou
Cancers 2024, 16(3), 537; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers16030537 - 26 Jan 2024
Viewed by 2138
Abstract
Long non-coding RNAs’ HOTAIR rs920778, LINC00951 rs11752942, POLR2E rs3787016, and HULC rs7763881 are progressively reported having a close genetic affinity with esophageal carcinogenesis in the East. Nonetheless, their correlation with variables already endorsed as significant prognostic factors in terms of staging, guiding treatment [...] Read more.
Long non-coding RNAs’ HOTAIR rs920778, LINC00951 rs11752942, POLR2E rs3787016, and HULC rs7763881 are progressively reported having a close genetic affinity with esophageal carcinogenesis in the East. Nonetheless, their correlation with variables already endorsed as significant prognostic factors in terms of staging, guiding treatment and predicting recurrence, metastasis, and survival have yet to be explored. Herein, we investigated their prognostic value by correlating them with clinicopathological and laboratory prognostic markers in esophageal cancer in the West. Formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue specimens from 95 consecutive patients operated on for esophageal cancer between 2014 and 2018 were compared with 121 healthy community controls. HULC was not detected differently in any of the cancer prognostic subgroups. LINC00951 was underrepresented in Ca19.9 elevated subgroup. HOTAIR was more frequent in both worse differentiation grade and positive Signet-Ring-Cell and Ca19.9 subgroups. POLR2E was identified less frequently in Adenocarcinoma, Signet-Ring-Cell, and Diffuse histologies, as well as in Perineural, Lymphovascular, and Perivascular Invasion positive, while it was overrepresented in CEA positive subgroup. These lncRNAs polymorphisms may hold great potential not only as future therapeutic agents but also as novel markers for predictive analysis of esophageal cancer risk, clinical outcome, and survival. Clinical implications of these findings need to be validated with prospective larger sample-size studies. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop