Search Results (2,642)

Background/Objectives: Older adults (65+) are the fastest growing age group in Canada, comprising 18.8% of the country’s population. During the COVID-19 pandemic, use of virtual care, including telehealth and tele-medicine, increased dramatically among older adults in Canada who often face higher health risks, mobility limitations, and many barriers to accessing healthcare. Despite the rapid expansion in virtual care, no systematic review has focused specifically on virtual care among older adults in Canada. This review aims to explore the factors influencing virtual care adoption and the experiences of older Canadians during the pandemic through a systematic review. Methods: Conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, the review involved a comprehensive search of PubMed, Scopus, ESCBOHost, and Web of Science on 2 May 2025, yielding 281 unique citations. After screening and applying eligibility criteria, 15 studies employing quantitative, qualitative, or mixed-methods designs, with sample sizes ranging from 15 to 2,282,798, were included and appraised using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT). Results: The review identified three domains of factors and the ways in which each factor shapes older adults’ virtual care experiences: (1) personal factors influencing virtual care use and demand (e.g., age, education, language, income, immigration status, community sizes), (2) resource factors impacting virtual care adoption (e.g., technology access, support), and (3) varying virtual care experiences among older adults (e.g., in assessment and communication efficacy, privacy, care quality, convenience, safety, and costs). Conclusions: This review highlights the complexities of virtual care engagement among older adults and underscores the need for inclusive, tailored strategies to improve the accessibility and effectiveness of virtual care delivery in both pandemic and post-pandemic contexts. Full article

Background/Objective: Nursing and non-nursing students experience high stress levels, making them susceptible to mental health issues. This study compared stress, anxiety, and depression between these two groups after 2 years of the COVID-19 pandemic. Additionally, it explored the relationship between perceived helplessness, self-efficacy, and symptoms of mental stress and strain resulting from challenging internship conditions for nursing students. Methods: This cross-sectional study included 154 nursing students (mean age = 22.43 years) and 291 non-nursing students (mean age = 27.7 years). Data were collected using the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales (DASS-21), Perceived Stress Scale-10 (PSS-10), and a questionnaire on mental stress and strain. Results: Nursing students reported significantly higher scores in the DASS-21 subscales depression (ηp² = 0.016) and anxiety (ηp² = 0.037), and global stress (PSS-10; ηp² = 0.029) compared to non-nursing students, but no significant difference on the DASS-21 Stress subscale. The observed group differences in the present study may be partially attributed to group differences in demographic factors. Helplessness correlated strongly with nearly all scales of mental stress and strain during internships (all p’s < 0.001), while self-efficacy showed a strong negative correlation with non-occupational difficulties, health impairment, and emotional problems (all p’s < 0.001). Conclusions: Nursing students experience elevated depression, anxiety, and perceived stress levels compared to non-nursing students. Stronger feelings of helplessness and lower confidence in their ability to overcome challenges were strongly correlated with mental stress and strain during clinical training. Targeted interventions such as cognitive behavioral training and stress management should be integrated into nursing curricula to enhance resilience and coping strategies. Full article

Background: Accumulating evidence indicates that SARS-CoV-2 infection results in long-term multiorgan complications, with the kidney being a primary target. This study aimed to characterize the long-term transcriptomic changes in the kidney following coronavirus infection using a murine model of MHV-1-induced SARS-like illness and to evaluate the therapeutic efficacy of SPIKENET (SPK). Methods: A/J mice were infected with MHV-1. Renal tissues were collected and subjected to immunofluorescence analysis and Next Generation RNA Sequencing to identify differentially expressed genes associated with acute and chronic infection. Bioinformatic analyses, including PCA, volcano plots, and GO/KEGG pathway enrichment, were performed. A separate cohort received SPK treatment, and comparative transcriptomic profiling was conducted. Gene expression profile was further confirmed using real-time PCR. Results: Acute infection showed the upregulation of genes involved in inflammation and fibrosis. Long-term MHV-1 infection led to the sustained upregulation of genes involved in muscle regeneration, cytoskeletal remodeling, and fibrotic responses. Notably, both expression and variability of SLC22 and SLC22A8, key proximal tubule transporters, were reduced, suggesting a loss of segment-specific identity. Further, SLC12A1, a critical regulator of sodium reabsorption and blood pressure, was downregulated and is associated with the onset of polyuria and hydronephrosis. SLC transporters exhibited expression patterns consistent with tubular dysfunction and inflammation. These findings suggest aberrant activation of myogenic pathways and structural proteins in renal tissues, consistent with a pro-fibrotic phenotype. In contrast, SPK treatment reversed the expression of most genes, thereby restoring the gene profiles to those observed in control mice. Conclusions: MHV-1-induced long COVID is associated with persistent transcriptional reprogramming in the kidney, indicative of chronic inflammation, cytoskeletal dysregulation, and fibrogenesis. SPK demonstrates robust therapeutic potential by normalizing these molecular signatures and preventing long-term renal damage. These findings underscore the relevance of the MHV-1 model and support further investigation of SPK as a candidate therapy for COVID-19-associated renal sequelae. Full article

The association between COVID-19 vaccination and thromboembolic events has garnered significant research attention, particularly with the advent of vaccines based on adenoviral vectors, including AstraZeneca’s and Johnson & Johnson’s vaccines. This review underscores the uncommon occurrence of venous thromboembolism (VTE), arterial thromboembolism (ATE), and vaccine-induced thrombotic thrombocytopenia (VITT) following COVID-19 vaccination. Although these complications are extremely rare compared to the heightened risk of thrombosis from COVID-19 infection, elements like age, biological sex, type of vaccine and underlying health conditions may contribute to their development. In addition, rare renal complications such as acute kidney injury and thrombotic microangiopathy have been documented, broadening the spectrum of potential vaccine-associated thrombotic manifestations. Current guidelines emphasize early detection, individualized risk assessment, and use of anticoagulation therapy to mitigate risks. Despite these events, the overwhelming majority of evidence supports the continued use of COVID-19 vaccines, given their proven efficacy in reducing severe illness and mortality. In addition, recent comparative data confirm that mRNA-based vaccines are associated with a significantly lower risk of serious thrombotic events compared to adenoviral vector platforms. Ongoing research is essential to further refine preventive and therapeutic strategies, particularly for at-risk populations. Full article

Nasal irrigation (NI) is an effective, safe, low-cost strategy for treating and preventing upper respiratory tract diseases. High-volume, low-pressure saline irrigations are the most efficient method for removing infectious agents, allergens, and inflammatory mediators. This article reviews clinical evidence supporting NI use in various conditions: nasal congestion in infants, recurrent respiratory infections, acute and chronic rhinosinusitis, allergic and gestational rhinitis, empty nose syndrome, and post-endoscopic sinus surgery care. NI improves symptoms, reduces recurrence, enhances the efficacy of topical drugs, and decreases the need for antibiotics and decongestants. During the COVID-19 pandemic, NI has also been explored as a complementary measure to reduce viral load. Due to the safe profile and mechanical cleansing action on inflammatory mucus, nasal irrigations represent a valuable adjunctive treatment across a wide range of sinonasal conditions. Full article

Background/Objectives: Mucosal vaccines, delivered intranasally or via inhalation, are being studied for respiratory infectious diseases like COVID-19 and influenza. These vaccines aim to provide non-invasive administration and strong immune responses at infection sites, making them a promising area of research. This systematic review and meta-analysis assessed their immunogenicity, safety, and protective efficacy. Methods: The study design was a systematic review and meta-analysis, searching PubMed and Cochrane databases up to 30 May 2025. Inclusion criteria followed the PICOS framework, focusing on mucosal vaccines for COVID-19, influenza, RSV, pertussis, and tuberculosis. Results: A total of 65 studies with 229,614 participants were included in the final analysis. Mucosal COVID-19 vaccines elicited higher neutralizing antibodies compared to intramuscular vaccines (SMD = 2.48, 95% CI: 2.17–2.78 for wild-type; SMD = 1.95, 95% CI: 1.32–2.58 for Omicron), with varying efficacy by route (inhaled VE = 47%, 95% CI: 22–74%; intranasal vaccine VE = 17%, 95% CI: 0–31%). Mucosal influenza vaccines protected children well (VE = 62%, 95% CI: 30–46%, I² = 17.1%), but seroconversion rates were lower than those of intramuscular vaccines. RSV and pertussis vaccines had high seroconversion rates (73% and 52%, respectively). Tuberculosis vaccines were reviewed systemically, exhibiting robust cellular immunogenicity. Safety was comparable to intramuscular vaccines or placebo, with no publication bias detected. Conclusions: Current evidence suggests mucosal vaccines are immunogenic, safe, and protective, particularly for respiratory diseases. This review provides insights for future research and vaccination strategies, though limitations include varying efficacy by route and study heterogeneity. Full article

Introduction: Long COVID syndrome is defined as persistent or new symptoms that appear after an acute SARS-CoV-2 infection and last at least three months without explanation. It is estimated that between 10% and 20% of those infected develop long COVID; however, data is not precise in Latin America. Although high immunization rates have reduced acute symptoms and the pandemic’s impact, there is a lack of evidence of its efficacy in preventing long COVID in the region. Methods: This scoping review followed PRISMA-ScR guidelines. Studies on vaccinated adults with long COVID from Central and South America and the Caribbean were included (Mexico was also considered). A comprehensive search across multiple databases was conducted. Data included study design, participant characteristics, vaccine type, and efficacy outcomes. Results are presented narratively and in tables. Results: Out of 3466 initial records, 8 studies met the inclusion criteria after rigorous selection processes. These studies encompassed populations from Brazil, Mexico, Latin America, and Bonaire, with 11,333 participants, 69.3% of whom were female. Vaccination, particularly with three or more doses, substantially reduces the risk and duration of long COVID. Variability was noted in the definitions and outcomes assessed across studies. Conclusions: This scoping review highlights that SARS-CoV-2 vaccination exhibits potential in reducing the burden of long COVID in the Americas. However, discrepancies in vaccine efficacy were observed depending on the study design, the population studied, and the vaccine regimen employed. Further robust, region-specific investigations are warranted to delineate the effects of vaccination on long COVID outcomes. Full article

Since the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic, remarkable progress has been made in the development of antiviral therapies for SARS-CoV-2. Several direct-acting antivirals, such as remdesivir, molnupiravir, and nirmatrelvir/ritonavir, offer clinical benefits. These agents have significantly contributed to reducing the viral loads and duration of the illness, as well as the disease’s severity and mortality. However, despite these advances, important limitations remain. The continued emergence of resistant SARS-CoV-2 variants highlights the urgent need for adaptable and durable therapeutic strategies. Therefore, this review aims to provide an updated overview of the main antiviral strategies that are used and the discovery of new drugs against SARS-CoV-2, as well as the therapeutic limitations that have shaped clinical management in recent years. The major challenges include resistance associated with viral mutations, limited treatment windows, and unequal access to treatment. Moreover, there is an ongoing need to identify novel compounds with broad-spectrum activity, improved pharmacokinetics, and suitable safety profiles. Combination treatment regimens represent a promising strategy to increase the efficacy of treating COVID-19 while minimizing the potential for resistance. Ideally, these interventions should be safe, affordable, and easy to administer, which would ensure broad global access and equitable treatment and enable control of COVID-19 cases and preparedness for future threats. Full article

During the COVID-19 pandemic, some studies suggested that transmission events could originate from schools. This study aimed to evaluate early-warning methods for identifying asymptomatic COVID-19 cases by implementing screening programs in schools. This study was conducted between September 2021 and May 2023, employing a rotation-screening plan for COVID-19 detection on a sample of students aged 14 to 19 years attending secondary schools in the regions of Tuscany, Veneto, Apulia and Friuli-Venezia Giulia. The schools were divided into two groups: experimental and control, with a ratio of 1:2. Two types of molecular salivary tests for SARS-CoV-2 were used to conduct the screening. This study included 16 experimental schools and 32 control schools. Out of 2527 subjects, 11,475 swabs were administrated, with 9177 tests deemed valid for analysis (a 20% loss of tests). Among these, 89 subjects (3.5%) tested positive. In control schools, 1895 subjects (6.5%) tested positive for SARS-CoV-2. This study recorded peaks in infections during the winter and autumn months, consistent with patterns observed in the general population. Beginning in September 2022, a shift occurred, with 2.6% of positive cases reported in the case schools compared to 0.3% in the control schools. Initially, most cases of COVID-19 were detected in the control schools; however, as the pandemic emergency phase concluded, cases were primarily identified through active screening in experimental schools. Although student participation in the active screening campaign was low during the project’s extension phase, this approach was efficacious in the early identification of positive cases. Full article

Background: Emerging evidence indicates that some individuals recovering from COVID-19 develop persistent symptoms, including fatigue, pain, cognitive difficulties, and psychological distress, commonly known as Long COVID. These symptoms often overlap with those seen in Chronic Fatigue Syndrome/Myalgic Encephalomyelitis (CFS/ME), underscoring the need for integrative, non-pharmacological interventions. This Phase II controlled trial aimed to evaluate the feasibility and preliminary efficacy of Heart Rate Variability Biofeedback (HRV-BF) in individuals with Long COVID who meet the diagnostic criteria for CFS/ME. Specific objectives included assessing feasibility indicators (drop-out rates, side effects, participant satisfaction) and changes in fatigue, depression, anxiety, pain, and health-related quality of life. Methods: Participants were assigned alternately and consecutively to the HRV-BF intervention or Treatment-as-usual (TAU), in a predefined 1:1 sequence (quasirandom assignment). The intervention consisted of 10 HRV-BF sessions, held twice weekly over 5 weeks, with each session including a 10 min respiratory preparation and 40 min of active training. Results: The overall drop-out rate was low (5.56%), and participants reported a generally high level of satisfaction. Regarding side effects, the mean total Simulator Sickness Questionnaire score was 24.31 (SD = 35.42), decreasing to 12.82 (SD = 15.24) after excluding an outlier. A significantly greater improvement in severe fatigue was observed in the experimental group (H = 4.083, p = 0.043). When considering all outcomes collectively, a tendency toward improvement was detected in the experimental group (binomial test, p < 0.0001). Conclusions: HRV-BF appears feasible and well tolerated. Findings support the need for Phase III trials to confirm its potential in mitigating fatigue in Long COVID. Full article

Background/Objectives: mRNA vaccines introduced during the COVID-19 pandemic were a significant step forward in the rapid development and deployment of vaccines in a global pandemic context. These vaccines showed good protective efficacy, but—due to limited breadth of the immune response—they required frequent boosters with manufactured spike sequences that often lagged behind the circulating strains. In order to enhance the breadth, durability, and magnitude of immune responses, we studied the effect of combining priming with an RNA vaccine technology with boosting with protein/adjuvant using a TLR4-agonist based adjuvant. Methods: Specifically, four proprietary adjuvants (EmT4^TM, LiT4Q^TM, MiT4^TM, and AlT4^TM) were investigated in combination with multiple modes of SARS-CoV-2 vaccination (protein, peptide, RNA) for their effectiveness in boosting antibody responses to SARS-CoV-2 spike protein in murine models. Results: Results showed significant improvement in immune response strength and breadth—especially against more distant SARS-CoV-2 variants such as Omicron—when adjuvants were used in combination with boosters following an RNA vaccine prime. Conclusions: The use of novel TLR4 adjuvants in combination with protein or RNA vaccinations presents a promising strategy for improving the efficacy of vaccines in the event of future pandemics, by leveraging rapid response using an RNA vaccine prime and following up with protein/adjuvant-based vaccines to enhance the breadth of immunity. Full article

RNA viruses pose significant threats to global health, causing diseases such as COVID-19, HIV/AIDS, influenza, and dengue. These viruses are characterized by high mutation rates, rapid evolution, and the ability to evade traditional antiviral therapies, making effective treatment and prevention particularly challenging. In recent years, CRISPR/Cas13 has emerged as a promising antiviral tool due to its ability to specifically target and degrade viral RNA. Unlike conventional antiviral strategies, Cas13 functions at the RNA level, providing a broad-spectrum and programmable approach to combating RNA viruses. Its flexibility allows for rapid adaptation of guide RNAs to counteract emerging viral variants, making it particularly suitable for highly diverse viruses such as SARS-CoV-2 and HIV. This review discusses up-to-date applications of Cas13 in targeting a wide range of RNA viruses, including SARS-CoV-2, HIV, dengue, influenza, and other RNA viruses, focusing on its therapeutic potential. Preclinical studies have demonstrated Cas13’s efficacy in degrading viral RNA and inhibiting replication, with applications spanning prophylactic interventions to post-infection treatments. However, challenges such as collateral cleavage, inefficient delivery, potential immunogenicity, and the development of an appropriate ethical framework must be addressed before clinical translation. Future research should focus on optimizing crRNA design, improving delivery systems, and conducting rigorous preclinical evaluations to enhance specificity, safety, and therapeutic efficacy. With continued advancements, Cas13 holds great promise as a revolutionary antiviral strategy, offering novel solutions to combat some of the world’s most persistent viral threats. Full article

The COVID-19 pandemic accelerated the rapid development and distribution of various vaccine platforms, resulting in a significant reduction in disease severity, hospitalizations, and mortality. However, persistent challenges remain concerning the durability and breadth of vaccine-induced protection, especially in the face of emerging SARS-CoV-2 variants. This review aimed to evaluate the factors influencing the immunogenicity and effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccines to inform future vaccine advancement strategies. A narrative review with systematic approach was conducted following PRISMA guidelines for narrative review. Literature was sourced from databases including PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science for studies published between December 2019 and May 2025. Encompassed studies assessed vaccine efficacy, immunogenicity, and safety across various populations and vaccine platforms. Data were collected qualitatively, with quantitative data from reviews highlighted where available. We have uncovered a decline in vaccine efficacy over time and weakened protection against novel variants such as Delta and Omicron. Booster doses, specifically heterologous regimens, improved immunogenicity and increased protection. Vaccine-induced neutralizing antibody titers have been found to correlate with clinical protection, although the long-term correlates of immunity remain poorly defined. The induction of IgG4 antibodies after repeated mRNA vaccinations raised concerns about potential modulation of the immune response. COVID-19 vaccines have contributed significantly to pandemic control; however, their efficacy is limited by the evolution of the virus and declining immunity. Forthcoming vaccine strategies should focus on broad-spectrum, variant-adapted formulations and defining robust comparisons of protection. Recognizing the immunological basis of vaccine response, including the role of specific antibody subclasses, is fundamental for optimizing long-term protection. Full article

Mental health difficulties in university students are an increasing concern, especially after the COVID-19 global crisis. This study used a cross-sectional design to analyze the effect of psychological factors on students’ psychological well-being. Participants were 190 university students enrolled in undergraduate or graduate programs at a public university. Based on previous research and grounded theoretical models, a conceptual model was proposed to analyze the influence of affect states/experiences (emotion regulation difficulties, anxiety and depression, perceived stress, self-compassion, gratitude, and satisfaction with life) on psychological well-being, including the indirect effect of emotions (negative emotions, positive activation emotions, self-efficacy emotions, prosocial emotions, and serenity emotions), using a path analysis. Multigroup analyses were also performed to test the moderating effect of gender and education level. Findings indicated that self-efficacy emotions had an indirect effect on the relationship between anxiety and depression, self-compassion, and psychological well-being. Both prosocial and self-efficacy emotions indirectly impacted the relationship between gratitude, satisfaction with life, and psychological well-being. Being a female and a bachelor student played a moderating role in the final model. The findings suggest that psychological interventions focused on self-efficacy and prosocial emotions are needed to increase psychological well-being in university students. Full article

Background and Objectives: The COVID-19 pandemic disrupted cancer care, prompting adaptations to reduce patient exposure while preserving treatment efficacy. This retrospective observational study compared a weekly cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) regimen to the standard monthly regimen for neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in patients with locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Materials and Methods: This single-center retrospective study included 91 patients, divided into two cohorts: weekly chemotherapy (n = 30) and standard chemotherapy (n = 61). Treatment assignment was based on hospital policy changes during the pandemic, with weekly outpatient chemotherapy implemented after November 2022 to conserve inpatient resources. All patients received radiotherapy at 50 Gy in 25 fractions. The weekly regimen consisted of cisplatin 20 mg/m² and 5-FU 800 mg/m², administered over 1–2 h weekly, while the standard regimen administered the same doses over four consecutive days on weeks 1 and 5. Primary endpoints were pathologic complete response (pCR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). Results: The response rates were similar between groups (weekly: 86.7% vs. standard: 90.2%; p = 0.724). The weekly regimen group showed a higher pCR (40.0% vs. 26.2%; p = 0.181) and significantly lower recurrence (26.7% vs. 52.5%; p = 0.020). Mortality was also reduced in the weekly group (6.7% vs. 34.4%; p = 0.004), though the follow-up duration was shorter (10.6 vs. 22.8 months; p < 0.001). Conclusions: In this retrospective observational study, weekly cisplatin and 5-FU demonstrated comparable efficacy to the standard regimen, with potential advantages in reducing recurrence and mortality. This modified approach may be a viable alternative for maintaining oncologic outcomes while minimizing the burden on healthcare systems during pandemic conditions, although prospective validation is needed. Full article