Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (9)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = ecological toxinology

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
20 pages, 4713 KB  
Article
X Marks the Clot: Evolutionary and Clinical Implications of Divergences in Procoagulant Australian Elapid Snake Venoms
by Holly Morecroft, Christina N. Zdenek, Abhinandan Chowdhury, Nathan Dunstan, Chris Hay and Bryan G. Fry
Toxins 2025, 17(8), 417; https://doi.org/10.3390/toxins17080417 - 18 Aug 2025
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 7839
Abstract
Australian elapid snakes possess potent procoagulant venoms, capable of inducing severe venom-induced consumption coagulopathy (VICC) in snakebite victims through rapid activation of the coagulation cascade by converting the FVII and prothrombin zymogens into their active forms. These venoms fall into two mechanistic categories: [...] Read more.
Australian elapid snakes possess potent procoagulant venoms, capable of inducing severe venom-induced consumption coagulopathy (VICC) in snakebite victims through rapid activation of the coagulation cascade by converting the FVII and prothrombin zymogens into their active forms. These venoms fall into two mechanistic categories: FXa-only venoms, which hijack host factor Va, and FXa:FVa venoms, containing a complete venom-derived prothrombinase complex. While previous studies have largely focused on human plasma, the ecological and evolutionary drivers behind prey-selective venom efficacy remain understudied. Here, thromboelastography was employed to comparatively evaluate venom coagulotoxicity across prey classes (amphibian, avian, rodent) and human plasma, using a taxonomically diverse selection of Australian snakes. The amphibian-specialist species Pseudechis porphyriacus (Red-Bellied Black Snake) exhibited significantly slower effects on rodent plasma, suggesting evolutionary refinement towards ectothermic prey. In contrast, venoms from dietary generalists retained broad efficacy across all prey types. Intriguingly, notable divergence was observed within Pseudonaja textilis (Eastern Brown Snake): Queensland populations of this species, and all other Pseudonaja (brown snake) species, formed rapid but weak clots in prey and human plasma. However, the South Australian populations of P. textilis produced strong, stable clots across prey plasmas and in human plasma. This is a trait shared with Oxyuranus species (taipans) and therefore represents an evolutionary reversion towards the prothrombinase phenotype present in the Oxyuranus and Pseudonaja last common ancestor. Clinically, this distinction has implications for the pathophysiology of human envenomation, potentially influencing clinical progression, including variations in clinical coagulopathy tests, and antivenom effectiveness. Thus, this study provides critical insight into the ecological selection pressures shaping venom function, highlights intraspecific venom variation linked to geographic and phylogenetic divergence, and underscores the importance of prey-focused research for both evolutionary toxinology and improved clinical management of snakebite. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Biochemistry, Pathology and Applications of Venoms)
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

5 pages, 2431 KB  
Interesting Images
A Documented Case of Ichthyophagy in the Malayan Krait (Bungarus candidus) and Its Implications for Toxinology
by Tim Lüddecke
Diversity 2025, 17(5), 326; https://doi.org/10.3390/d17050326 - 30 Apr 2025
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1673
Abstract
Snakebite is a neglected tropical disease, and the high potency of snake venoms has been evolutionary refined for trophic interactions. Hence, understanding the feeding ecology of snakes is a major element needed to meaningfully interpret toxinological data gathered for snake toxins. However, the [...] Read more.
Snakebite is a neglected tropical disease, and the high potency of snake venoms has been evolutionary refined for trophic interactions. Hence, understanding the feeding ecology of snakes is a major element needed to meaningfully interpret toxinological data gathered for snake toxins. However, the diet of several medically important snakes is vastly understudied. Here, the first case of in situ observed ichthyophagy in the Malayan Krait (Bungarus candidus), a highly venomous Asian elapid, which is supposedly an ophiophagous specialist, is reported. This report has important repercussions for Krait toxinology as it shows that fish as prey need to be considered when analyzing their venoms in light of eco-evolutionary and functional studies. It also suggests that this snake may be more trophically opportunistic than previously thought, which must be taken into account when calculating distribution ranges in the context of snakebite analyses. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Amphibian and Reptile Adaptation: Biodiversity and Monitoring)
Show Figures

Figure 1

24 pages, 5459 KB  
Article
Venom Composition of Neglected Bothropoid Snakes from the Amazon Rainforest: Ecological and Toxinological Implications
by Luciana A. Freitas-de-Sousa, Mônica Colombini, Vinicius C. Souza, Joanderson P. C. Silva, Ageane Mota-da-Silva, Marllus R. N. Almeida, Reginaldo A. Machado, Wirven L. Fonseca, Marco A. Sartim, Jacqueline Sachett, Solange M. T. Serrano, Inácio L. M. Junqueira-de-Azevedo, Felipe G. Grazziotin, Wuelton M. Monteiro, Paulo S. Bernarde and Ana M. Moura-da-Silva
Toxins 2024, 16(2), 83; https://doi.org/10.3390/toxins16020083 - 4 Feb 2024
Cited by 7 | Viewed by 5768
Abstract
Snake venoms have evolved in several families of Caenophidae, and their toxins have been assumed to be biochemical weapons with a role as a trophic adaptation. However, it remains unclear how venom contributes to the success of venomous species for adaptation to different [...] Read more.
Snake venoms have evolved in several families of Caenophidae, and their toxins have been assumed to be biochemical weapons with a role as a trophic adaptation. However, it remains unclear how venom contributes to the success of venomous species for adaptation to different environments. Here we compared the venoms from Bothrocophias hyoprora, Bothrops taeniatus, Bothrops bilineatus smaragdinus, Bothrops brazili, and Bothrops atrox collected in the Amazon Rainforest, aiming to understand the ecological and toxinological consequences of venom composition. Transcriptomic and proteomic analyses indicated that the venoms presented the same toxin groups characteristic from bothropoids, but with distinct isoforms with variable qualitative and quantitative abundances, contributing to distinct enzymatic and toxic effects. Despite the particularities of each venom, commercial Bothrops antivenom recognized the venom components and neutralized the lethality of all species. No clear features could be observed between venoms from arboreal and terrestrial habitats, nor in the dispersion of the species throughout the Amazon habitats, supporting the notion that venom composition may not shape the ecological or toxinological characteristics of these snake species and that other factors influence their foraging or dispersal in different ecological niches. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Animal Venoms)
Show Figures

Figure 1

23 pages, 2255 KB  
Article
The Fast and the Furriest: Investigating the Rate of Selection on Mammalian Toxins
by Leah Lucy Joscelyne Fitzpatrick, Vincent Nijman, Rodrigo Ligabue-Braun and K. Anne-Isola Nekaris
Toxins 2022, 14(12), 842; https://doi.org/10.3390/toxins14120842 - 1 Dec 2022
Cited by 3 | Viewed by 5367
Abstract
The evolution of venom and the selection pressures that act on toxins have been increasingly researched within toxinology in the last two decades, in part due to the exceptionally high rates of diversifying selection observed in animal toxins. In 2015, Sungar and Moran [...] Read more.
The evolution of venom and the selection pressures that act on toxins have been increasingly researched within toxinology in the last two decades, in part due to the exceptionally high rates of diversifying selection observed in animal toxins. In 2015, Sungar and Moran proposed the ‘two-speed’ model of toxin evolution linking evolutionary age of a group to the rates of selection acting on toxins but due to a lack of data, mammals were not included as less than 30 species of venomous mammal have been recorded, represented by elusive species which produce small amounts of venom. Due to advances in genomics and transcriptomics, the availability of toxin sequences from venomous mammals has been increasing. Using branch- and site-specific selection models, we present the rates of both episodic and pervasive selection acting upon venomous mammal toxins as a group for the first time. We identified seven toxin groups present within venomous mammals, representing Chiroptera, Eulipotyphla and Monotremata: KLK1, Plasminogen Activator, Desmallipins, PACAP, CRiSP, Kunitz Domain One and Kunitz Domain Two. All but one group (KLK1) was identified by our results to be evolving under both episodic and pervasive diversifying selection with four toxin groups having sites that were implicated in the fitness of the animal by TreeSAAP (Selection on Amino Acid Properties). Our results suggest that venomous mammal ecology, behaviour or genomic evolution are the main drivers of selection, although evolutionary age may still be a factor. Our conclusion from these results indicates that mammalian toxins are following the two-speed model of selection, evolving predominately under diversifying selection, fitting in with other younger venomous taxa like snakes and cone snails—with high amounts of accumulating mutations, leading to more novel adaptions in their toxins. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Evolution of Venomous and Poisonous Animals)
Show Figures

Figure 1

16 pages, 10131 KB  
Article
Biological Activities and Proteomic Profile of the Venom of Vipera ursinii ssp., a very Rare Karst Viper from Croatia
by Maja Lang Balija, Adrijana Leonardi, Marija Brgles, Dora Sviben, Tihana Kurtović, Beata Halassy and Igor Križaj
Toxins 2020, 12(3), 187; https://doi.org/10.3390/toxins12030187 - 16 Mar 2020
Cited by 19 | Viewed by 7330
Abstract
The karst viper (Vipera ursinii ssp.) favours high-mountain dry grasslands in southern and south-eastern Croatia. It is medically less important than other Vipera species, because of its remote habitat and the very small amount of venom that it injects by its relatively [...] Read more.
The karst viper (Vipera ursinii ssp.) favours high-mountain dry grasslands in southern and south-eastern Croatia. It is medically less important than other Vipera species, because of its remote habitat and the very small amount of venom that it injects by its relatively short fangs. The scientific literature on Vipera ursinii deals mostly with the morphology, ecology and distribution range of this snake, due to the species’ conservation issues, while the toxinological aspects of its venom have not so far been investigated. Here we report on the composition and biological activity of the Vipera ursinii ssp. venom. Using a proteomics approach, we have identified 25 proteins in the venom that belong to seven protein families: snake venom metalloproteinase, serine protease, secreted phospholipase A2, cysteine-rich secretory protein, snake C-type lectin-like protein, serine protease inhibitor and nerve growth factor. The Vipera ursinii ssp. venom was found to be distinctively insecticidal. Its lethal toxicity towards crickets was more than five times greater than that of Vipera ammodytes ammodytes venom, while the opposite held in mice. Interestingly, the mode of dying after injecting a mouse with Vipera ursinii ssp. venom may suggest the presence of a neurotoxic component. Neurotoxic effects of European vipers have so far been ascribed exclusively to ammodytoxins and ammodytoxin-like basic secreted phospholipases A2. Structural and immunological analyses of the Vipera ursinii ssp. venom, however, confirmed that ammodytoxin-like proteins are not present in this venom. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Animal Venoms)
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

21 pages, 2392 KB  
Review
Evolutionary Ecology of Fish Venom: Adaptations and Consequences of Evolving a Venom System
by Richard J. Harris and Ronald A. Jenner
Toxins 2019, 11(2), 60; https://doi.org/10.3390/toxins11020060 - 22 Jan 2019
Cited by 59 | Viewed by 15589
Abstract
Research on venomous animals has mainly focused on the molecular, biochemical, and pharmacological aspects of venom toxins. However, it is the relatively neglected broader study of evolutionary ecology that is crucial for understanding the biological relevance of venom systems. As fish have convergently [...] Read more.
Research on venomous animals has mainly focused on the molecular, biochemical, and pharmacological aspects of venom toxins. However, it is the relatively neglected broader study of evolutionary ecology that is crucial for understanding the biological relevance of venom systems. As fish have convergently evolved venom systems multiple times, it makes them ideal organisms to investigate the evolutionary ecology of venom on a broader scale. This review outlines what is known about how fish venom systems evolved as a result of natural enemy interactions and about the ecological consequences of evolving a venom system. This review will show how research on the evolutionary ecology of venom in fish can aid in understanding the evolutionary ecology of animal venoms more generally. Further, understanding these broad ecological questions can shed more light on the other areas of toxinology, with applications across multiple disciplinary fields. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Evolutionary Ecology of Venom)
Show Figures

Figure 1

20 pages, 638 KB  
Review
Phylogenetic Comparative Methods can Provide Important Insights into the Evolution of Toxic Weaponry
by Kevin Arbuckle
Toxins 2018, 10(12), 518; https://doi.org/10.3390/toxins10120518 - 5 Dec 2018
Cited by 10 | Viewed by 7708
Abstract
The literature on chemical weaponry of organisms is vast and provides a rich understanding of the composition and mechanisms of the toxins and other components involved. However, an ecological or evolutionary perspective has often been lacking and is largely limited to (1) molecular [...] Read more.
The literature on chemical weaponry of organisms is vast and provides a rich understanding of the composition and mechanisms of the toxins and other components involved. However, an ecological or evolutionary perspective has often been lacking and is largely limited to (1) molecular evolutionary studies of particular toxins (lacking an ecological view); (2) comparisons across different species that ignore phylogenetic relatedness (lacking an evolutionary view); or (3) descriptive studies of venom composition and toxicology that contain post hoc and untested ecological or evolutionary interpretations (a common event but essentially uninformative speculation). Conveniently, comparative biologists have prolifically been developing and using a wide range of phylogenetic comparative methods that allow us to explicitly address many ecological and evolutionary questions relating to venoms and poisons. Nevertheless, these analytical tools and approaches are rarely used and poorly known by biological toxinologists and toxicologists. In this review I aim to (1) introduce phylogenetic comparative methods to the latter audience; (2) highlight the range of questions that can be addressed using them; and (3) encourage biological toxinologists and toxicologists to either seek out adequate training in comparative biology or seek collaboration with comparative biologists to reap the fruits of a powerful interdisciplinary approach to the field. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Toxins:10th Anniversary)
Show Figures

Figure 1

13 pages, 1466 KB  
Review
Interaction between Insects, Toxins, and Bacteria: Have We Been Wrong So Far?
by Guillaume Tetreau
Toxins 2018, 10(7), 281; https://doi.org/10.3390/toxins10070281 - 6 Jul 2018
Cited by 20 | Viewed by 7781
Abstract
Toxins are a major virulence factor produced by many pathogenic bacteria. In vertebrates, the response of hosts to the bacteria is inseparable from the response to the toxins, allowing a comprehensive understanding of this tripartite host-pathogen-toxin interaction. However, in invertebrates, this interaction has [...] Read more.
Toxins are a major virulence factor produced by many pathogenic bacteria. In vertebrates, the response of hosts to the bacteria is inseparable from the response to the toxins, allowing a comprehensive understanding of this tripartite host-pathogen-toxin interaction. However, in invertebrates, this interaction has been investigated by two complementary but historically distinct fields of research: toxinology and immunology. In this article, I highlight how such dichotomy between these two fields led to a biased, or even erroneous view of the ecology and evolution of the interaction between insects, toxins, and bacteria. I focus on the reason behind such a dichotomy, on how to bridge the fields together, and on confounding effects that could bias the outcome of the experiments. Finally, I raise four questions at the border of the two fields on the cross-effects between toxins, bacteria, and spores that have been largely underexplored to promote a more comprehensive view of this interaction. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Toxins and Immunology)
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

14 pages, 739 KB  
Article
Fossilized Venom: The Unusually Conserved Venom Profiles of Heloderma Species (Beaded Lizards and Gila Monsters)
by Ivan Koludarov, Timothy N. W. Jackson, Kartik Sunagar, Amanda Nouwens, Iwan Hendrikx and Bryan G. Fry
Toxins 2014, 6(12), 3582-3595; https://doi.org/10.3390/toxins6123582 - 22 Dec 2014
Cited by 22 | Viewed by 11623
Abstract
Research into snake venoms has revealed extensive variation at all taxonomic levels. Lizard venoms, however, have received scant research attention in general, and no studies of intraclade variation in lizard venom composition have been attempted to date. Despite their iconic status and proven [...] Read more.
Research into snake venoms has revealed extensive variation at all taxonomic levels. Lizard venoms, however, have received scant research attention in general, and no studies of intraclade variation in lizard venom composition have been attempted to date. Despite their iconic status and proven usefulness in drug design and discovery, highly venomous helodermatid lizards (gila monsters and beaded lizards) have remained neglected by toxinological research. Proteomic comparisons of venoms of three helodermatid lizards in this study has unravelled an unusual similarity in venom-composition, despite the long evolutionary time (~30 million years) separating H. suspectum from the other two species included in this study (H. exasperatum and H. horridum). Moreover, several genes encoding the major helodermatid toxins appeared to be extremely well-conserved under the influence of negative selection (but with these results regarded as preliminary due to the scarcity of available sequences). While the feeding ecologies of all species of helodermatid lizard are broadly similar, there are significant morphological differences between species, which impact upon relative niche occupation. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Selected Papers from the 5th Venoms to Drugs Meeting)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop