Next Article in Journal
Bee Venom Stimulates Growth Factor Release from Adipose-Derived Stem Cells to Promote Hair Growth
Previous Article in Journal
Bioaccumulation of Microcystin-LR and Induced Physio-Biochemical Changes in Rice (Oryza sativa L.) at Vegetative Stage under Hydroponic Culture Conditions
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Toxins
Volume 16
Issue 2
10.3390/toxins16020083
toxins-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Venom Composition of Neglected Bothropoid Snakes from the Amazon Rainforest: Ecological and Toxinological Implications

by
Luciana A. Freitas-de-Sousa
1,†,
Mônica Colombini
1,†,
Vinicius C. Souza
2,†,
Joanderson P. C. Silva
2,
Ageane Mota-da-Silva
3,
Marllus R. N. Almeida
4,
Reginaldo A. Machado
4,
Wirven L. Fonseca
4,
Marco A. Sartim
5,
Jacqueline Sachett
5,
Solange M. T. Serrano
2,
Inácio L. M. Junqueira-de-Azevedo
2,
Felipe G. Grazziotin
6,
Wuelton M. Monteiro
5,
Paulo S. Bernarde
4 and
Ana M. Moura-da-Silva
1,*
1
Laboratório de Imunopatologia, Instituto Butantan, São Paulo 05503-900, SP, Brazil
2
Laboratório de Toxinologia Aplicada, Instituto Butantan, São Paulo 05503-900, SP, Brazil
3
Instituto Federal do Acre, Campus de Cruzeiro do Sul, Cruzeiro do Sul 69980-000, AC, Brazil
4
Laboratório de Herpetologia, Universidade Federal do Acre, Campus Floresta, Cruzeiro do Sul 69895-000, AC, Brazil
5
Instituto de Pesquisa Clínica Carlos Borborema, Fundação de Medicina Tropical Dr. Heitor Vieira Dourado, Manaus 69040-000, AM, Brazil
6
Laboratório de Coleções Zoológicas, Instituto Butantan, São Paulo 05503-900, SP, Brazil
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
These authors equally contributed to the manuscript.
Toxins 2024, 16(2), 83; https://doi.org/10.3390/toxins16020083
Submission received: 11 December 2023 / Revised: 18 January 2024 / Accepted: 30 January 2024 / Published: 4 February 2024
(This article belongs to the Section Animal Venoms)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Snake venoms have evolved in several families of Caenophidae, and their toxins have been assumed to be biochemical weapons with a role as a trophic adaptation. However, it remains unclear how venom contributes to the success of venomous species for adaptation to different environments. Here we compared the venoms from Bothrocophias hyoprora, Bothrops taeniatus, Bothrops bilineatus smaragdinus, Bothrops brazili, and Bothrops atrox collected in the Amazon Rainforest, aiming to understand the ecological and toxinological consequences of venom composition. Transcriptomic and proteomic analyses indicated that the venoms presented the same toxin groups characteristic from bothropoids, but with distinct isoforms with variable qualitative and quantitative abundances, contributing to distinct enzymatic and toxic effects. Despite the particularities of each venom, commercial Bothrops antivenom recognized the venom components and neutralized the lethality of all species. No clear features could be observed between venoms from arboreal and terrestrial habitats, nor in the dispersion of the species throughout the Amazon habitats, supporting the notion that venom composition may not shape the ecological or toxinological characteristics of these snake species and that other factors influence their foraging or dispersal in different ecological niches.
Keywords:
snake venoms; transcriptomics; proteomics; antivenom; Amazon; Bothrops; Bothrocophias
Key Contribution: How venom contributes to the success of venomous species and their adaptation to different environments is still uncertain. Evaluating the venom composition and antivenom neutralization of snakes inhabiting the Alto Juruá Region of the Brazilian Amazon, we suggest that venom composition is not one of the major factors for snake species’ success and dispersal or foraging behavior. Despite differences in venom composition, commercial antivenoms efficiently neutralize the lethal activity of the venoms.

1. Introduction

Almost 435 species of snakes are known to inhabit the Brazilian territory, of which 238 occur in the Amazon Forest [1] and 80 have already been recorded in the Alto Juruá region at Acre, the westernmost state of Brazil [2]. The Alto Juruá region still maintains more than 80% of its original vegetation with high complexity and environmental heterogeneity [3]. It is characterized by a dendritic system of water courses [4] shared between Peru and the Brazilian states of Acre and Amazonas. Recently, Bernarde and collaborators recorded venomous species in the region that are included in the Elapidae and Viperidae families. In Viperidae, the presence of Crotalus spp. was not detected, but Lachesis muta (bushmaster) and bothropoids (lanceheads) were frequent. Among the bothropoids, five species were recorded: Bothrocophias hyoprora, Bothrops atrox, Bothrops bilineatus smaragdinus, Bothrops brazili, and Bothrops taeniatus [2]. They are all endemic species of the Amazon, extending to eastern Ecuador, southern Colombia, Venezuela, northwestern Peru and Bolivia, Guyana, Suriname, and French Guiana [2]. Although sympatric and with a mainly generalist feeding habit, these species differ in terms of their activity substrates and the population sizes in the territories they occupy, with the consequent implications for snakebites [2]. B. b. smaragdinus and B. taeniatus are arboreal species in contrast to B. hyoprora, B. brazili, and B. atrox, which are predominantly terrestrial [2]. However, the most notable point is the abundance in which B. atrox occupies the entire territory of the Amazon, being the main cause of snakebites in the region [5]. The composition of the venom of these snakes could be one of the factors favoring the differences in activity substrates and population dispersal in different habitats. Venom represents an adaptive trophic trait, and venom variation is shaped by a variety of evolutionary processes and ecological adaptations such as diet [6,7,8], environmental conditions [9], snake ontogeny [10,11,12,13,14,15], and geographical distribution [13,16,17,18]. Therefore, snake venoms provide an ideal system for investigating the mechanisms shaping the snake ecological adaptations with the great advantage of displaying clear genotype–phenotype relationships and measurable bioactive properties.
There are many studies describing the composition and variability of B. atrox venom from specimens collected in different geographical areas and habitats of the Amazon [12,19,20,21,22]. In opposition, only a few papers report the composition of venoms from B. brazili [23], B. b. smaragdinus [24], and Bothrocophias spp. [25,26,27], and little is known about the venom composition of B. taeniatus [27]. Interestingly, these reports indicate similar characteristics among the venoms of these species comprising toxins belonging to the most characteristic groups from Bothrops snake venoms including snake venom metalloproteinases (SVMPs), snake venom serine proteinases (SVSPs), phospholipases A2 (PLA2), and C-type lectin-like proteins (CTL), majorly. However, the available data were acquired from specimens collected from different locations, mostly from captivity, and different ontogenetic stages. Such conditions are known to interfere with the abundance of each toxin group in the venoms making it difficult to correlate venom composition with the different ecological characteristics of the snake species. Thus, here we sought to describe and compare the venom gland transcriptomes and venom proteomes from specimens of B. hyoprora, B. taeniatus, B. b. smaragdinus, B. brazili, and B. atrox collected in the Alto Juruá region, aiming to address the possible role of venom composition and toxinological properties in shaping the ecological characteristics of each species.

2. Results and Discussion

To examine the venom composition of snakes, we selected two specimens of Bothrocophias hyoprora, three specimens of B. b. smaragdinus, three specimens of B. brazili, three specimens of B. atrox, and one specimen of B. taeniatus, illustrated in Figure 1A–E, collected in the Acre State of Brazil, mostly in the Alto Juruá region (Figure 1F).
As a first step of the comparison, venoms were pooled according to the snake species and subjected to reversed-phase high-performance liquid chromatography (RP-HPLC) chromatography under standard conditions [9]. As shown in Figure 2, the elution profiles were overall consistent with the fractionation of bothropoid venoms under similar conditions [27,28,29,30]; however, the size of the peaks eluted in similar retention times varied considerably suggesting the different quantitative distribution of toxin isoforms amongst the species. Peaks eluted after 80 min, which are correlated to SVMPs and frequent in venoms of Bothrops snakes [9], were characteristic in B. atrox, B. taeniatus, and B. b. smaragdinus snake venoms. Another marked position in the chromatograms is the peak corresponding to noncatalytic K49-PLA2 homologs eluted between 55 and 60 min, detected in higher abundance in the B. brazili venom chromatogram while much lower absorbances were detected in the other venom chromatograms at the same elution time. B. hyoprora, B. taeniatus, and B. brazili venoms showed a very complex profile between 60 and 80 min, which usually elutes different toxins as SVSPs, CTLs, acidic PLA2s, and other minor components [9].
To understand the venom complexity, we decided to compare the amino-acid sequences of toxin isoforms and their expression levels in the biochemical arsenal produced by each species. Thus, we first sequenced, assembled, and characterized the venom gland transcriptome of selected snakes, followed by a shot-gun proteomic analysis and functional assays of the venom pools.
Concerning the transcriptomes, the number of merged reads ranged from approximately 4,000,000 in B. b. smaragdinus to 30,000,000 in B. hyoprora. Reads were assembled into contigs yielding an average of 173,981 contigs per species, from which 540, on average, were predicted as putative toxins before curation (Supplementary Table S1).
After annotation, the number of recovered toxins and toxin families (Table 1) was generally consistent with those of other viperid venom gland transcriptomes [31,32,33,34,35,36]. We annotated 264 transcripts of predicted toxins for the five species, which corresponded to fully coding sequences of 19 toxin families. SVMPs (Snake Venom Metalloproteinases), CTL (C-Type Lectin-Like Toxins), SVSP (Snake Venom Serine Proteinases), PLA2 (Phospholipases A2), and VEGF (Vascular Endothelial Growth Factors) were represented by multiple independent transcripts in venoms from the five species. CRISPs (Cysteine Rich Secretory Proteins), PDEs (Phosphodiesterases), and PLBs (Phospholipases B) were detected in all venom glands, but mostly as a single copy. LAAOs (L-Amino Acid Oxidases), HYAL (Hyaluronidases), NGF (Nerve Growth Factors), NUCs (5′Nucleotidases), BPPs (Bradykinin Potentiating Factors), DIPEP (Dipeptidyl Peptidases), CYS (Cystatins), iPLAs (Phospholipase inhibitors), LIPAs (Lipases), WAP (Warprins), and KUN (Kunitz Trypsin Inhibitors) were not detected in all venom samples, or if detected, it was as a single copy (Table 1).
In Figure 3 we show the summary of venom gland transcriptomes from the five species. The venom transcriptomes of B. taeniatus, B. b. smaragdinus, and B. atrox are characterized by the high expression of CTLs, accounting for 48.6%, 44.0%, and 60.4%, respectively, of total toxin transcripts (Figure 3A–C). The transcriptome of the B. brazili venom gland was largely dominated by PLA2s (67.13%), mostly represented by a single transcript encoding a K49 noncatalytic homologue of snake venom PLA2s (59.46%) (Figure 3D). In the B. hyoprora venom gland transcriptome, the most abundant toxin groups were the SVMPs (39.2%) and PLA2s (22.2%), the latter represented by a single transcript of an acidic PLA2 isoform (Figure 3E). PLA2s presented a low transcript number, but they are among the highest expressed in all species. Some of the SVMP transcripts also figure as the most expressed, even in CTL-rich transcriptomes (Figure 3).
It is important to point out that transcriptomes were carried out individually and the data presented here are the mean of TPMs obtained in each species. Some cases of quantitative intraspecific variation were observed comparing the transcript abundances: two isoforms of SVMP and two of SVSP were more abundant in the B. hyoprora adult snake, but these transcripts were not represented in the proteomes; quantitative and qualitative higher abundance in CTL isoforms were observed in the B. b. smaragdinus collected in Resex Cazumbá, Sena Madureira, which could be attributed to geographical or habitat variation; adult specimens of B. brazili presented proportionally higher amounts of PLA2, indicating ontogenetic variation. However, the interpretation of these data is beyond the scope of this manuscript.
To our knowledge, transcriptomes from B. hyoprora, B. taeniatus, B. b. smaragdinus, and B. brazili venom glands have so far not been described. In contrast, B. atrox venom gland transcriptomes have been described by Neiva and collaborators [37], using expressed sequence tags (ESTs), and by our group [31], via Next Generation Sequencing using Illumina technology. Interestingly, the transcriptomic analysis via these methods resulted in a different pattern compared to the one described here. In both studies, SVMPs dominated the transcriptomes with expression levels higher than 60% while the expression of CTL transcripts was lower, comprising 5 to 20% of total toxin expression. The divergences between these data and the data from Neiva and collaborators [37] could be attributed to the different methodologies used in both studies. However, in our previous study [31] we used similar methods for sequencing and assembling the contigs, suggesting that the differences observed could be due to intraspecific variation as the geographical distance between the places in which snakes were collected could be a likely variable for explaining the higher proportion of CTLs (60.4%) and lower expression of SVMPs (20.2%) described in this study.
The venom proteomic analysis (Figure 4) was carried out using pooled venoms from each species. Even considering the individual differences observed in the transcriptomes, the proteomic and functional characterization of the venoms could not be carried out individually due to the minor quantities of venom collected from a single snake. Spectra identification and quantification were based on the protein sequences predicted from a non-redundant transcriptome master set of the same specimens used for venom extraction. As observed in the venom gland transcriptomes, in venom proteomes CTLs were the most abundant toxin group in the venoms of B. taeniatus (31.6%), B. b. smaragdinus (33.0%), and B. atrox (32.0%) while SVMPs and PLA2s dominated the venoms of B hyoprora (23.7% and 20.2%) and B. brazili (20.2% and 20.4%). Interestingly, only PLA2 acidic isoforms were present in B. hyoprora venom while non-catalytic PLA2 basic homologues are the major isoform in B. brazili venom. Comparing the abundance of toxin groups detected in the proteomes and transcriptomes, in B. taeniatus, B. b. smaragdinus, and B. atrox venoms we observed a marked decrease in the relative amounts of CTLs (average of 51.3% in transcriptomes to 32.2% in proteomes) and a decrease in the relative expression of PLA2s in B. brazili venom (62% in the transcriptome to 35% in the proteome). In opposition, a relevant increase in the relative abundance of SVSPs was observed in the proteomes of all venoms with an average of 7.3% in transcriptomes, rising to 16.4% in proteomes (Figure 3 and Figure 4). This finding may be explained by differences in the ionization of trypsin fragments from each toxin group, but differences in translation rates of transcripts from each toxin type may not be disregarded. In our previous study [31], we observed that many transcripts, mostly of CTLs, were not translated to the corresponding venom isoform, even those with high transcriptional rates. Moreover, a similar observation was reported by Mason and collaborators [38] showing intraspecific variation in transcript expression levels between two specimens of B. nigroviridis.
There are several studies concerning the venom composition, variability, and functional properties of B. atrox venom [12,39,40,41,42]. However, only a few reports are available concerning the other venoms. Proteomes of B. brazili [23] and B. b. smaragdinus [24] have already been reported. The venom composition previously reported for B. brazili was very similar to the results reported in this study, characterized by the marked presence of basic PLA2 K49 homologs [23]. Interestingly, the previous study was performed with pooled venoms from captivity specimens originally from the Brazilian Pará State (eastern Amazon) while our study used venoms from wild specimens collected in Acre (western Amazon). The similarity between the venom composition observed in both studies suggests that the geographical distance between the two localities or the conditions in which snakes were maintained do not appear to modulate the composition of B. brazili venom. However, the opposite was observed comparing the previous venom proteomes of B. b. smaragdinus. In the previous study [24], SVMPs were the most abundant toxin group followed by lower proportions of CTLs, distinct from our data that showed the CTLs as the dominant toxin group. Here, all snakes analyzed were collected in the western Amazon, while in the previous study, proteomes were generated based on two sets of pooled venoms, as follows: (1) from two snakes born in captivity from a pregnant female collected in the western Amazon; and (2) from venoms extracted from 10 specimens collected in Peru. Both sets of pooled venoms show SVMP dominance and low levels of CTL, particularly in the Peruvian specimens [24]. At first glance, these data suggests that venom variability is higher in B. b. smaragdinus than in B. brazili snakes. However, the methods of isoform quantification used in these studies are different; therefore, this observation should be taken with caution. On the other hand, compared to previous studies, we observed in this study a reduction in SVMP abundance and an increase in CTL in the venoms of B. atrox. In previous studies carried out by our group, we observed a higher abundance of SVMPs in venoms of B. atrox snakes collected in the Pará State (eastern Amazon) [31], Amazonas State (central Amazon), and Maranhão State (western Amazon) [43]. In these previous studies, proteomics quantification has been carried out with the same methods used here (shot-gun proteomic analysis and protein quantification based on the species transcriptome); therefore, it is reasonable to assume that the composition of B. atrox venoms from specimens collected in Acre is indeed richer in CTLs rather than in SVMPs, and the same may be acceptable for B. b. smaragdinus. Proteomes of B. hyoprora and B. taeniatus venoms have not been described so far, and venom composition has been inferred via the C18 RP-HPLC chromatographic profiles of venoms from these species collected in Peru [27]. The RP-HPLC profile of B. taeniatus venom was similar to the one reported in this study, suggesting a small variation in venom composition between the specimens involved in both studies.
Important differences were noted in B. hyoprora chromatograms, particularly by the presence of the K49-PLA2 homologs described previously that were not detected here with the samples collected in Acre. The presence of K49-PLA2 homologs has also been reported in proteomes of Bothrocophias campbelli [26] and Bothrocophias myersi [25] venoms. Thus, we attempted to search the spectra generated in the LC-MS/MS using the B. hyoprora venom pool against a comprehensive databank comprising 111,653 sequences from snake venom-related proteins [44]; and even in this search, K49-PLA2 isoforms were not detected in the B. hyoprora venom proteome, evidencing their absence in the venom of B. hyoprora from Acre.
In summary, the venom composition of the five species studied conserved the same protein families present in venoms of bothropoid snakes, but with important quantitative differences in the proteomes and the chromatographic profiles. This suggests that the presence of different isoforms representing the main protein families in each venom may account for the qualitative differences observed in the chromatograms. Therefore, in the next step, we aligned the primary sequences and compared the relative expression (NSFA) of the most abundant isoforms of SVMPs, PLA2s, CTLs, and SVSPs present in the venoms. In the phylogenetic analysis of each toxin group (Figure 5), B. hyoprora venom appeared to be the least complex, presenting only one sequence of CTL, one of SVSP, and one of PLA2 that clustered with similar isoforms from venoms of the other species. Two SVMP isoforms were present in the venom, one of a PI-class that showed 94.4% identity with Atroxlysin-Ia, a hemorrhagic PI-class SVMP widely represented in different samples of B. atrox venom [45,46], and one PIII-class SVMP that clustered with similar isoforms from venoms of the other species. This suggests that the phylogenetic distances among the species, as described by Alencar and collaborators [47], are not represented in the diversification of the venom toxins. It is important to note that the B. hyoprora transcriptome revealed a more complex pattern on transcripts with 14 different SVMPs, 12 SVSPs, 4 CTLs, and 2 PLA2s. The reason why only a few transcripts were detected or translated to the venom is still unclear. The venoms of the other species shared a higher complexity, with several different isoforms that clustered with their homologs present in the other species, suggesting that ancestor ortholog genes are similarly active in all species. However, some peculiarities were also observed. The highest expression of two SVMP isoforms, from PI- and PIII-classes, was in B. atrox venom (Figure 5A); the presence of one cluster of SVSPs appeared to be exclusive to B. brazili venom (Figure 5B); and the presence of the K49-PLA2 homologs were only found in B. b. smaragdinus and B. brazili venoms (Figure 5C).
The presence and abundance of different isoforms result in the overall biological effects of the venoms. Indeed, in Figure 6, we show a comparison of the enzymatic activities of each pool of venom. SVMP activity varied among the venoms and was highest in the venoms of B. atrox and B. b. smaragdinus (Figure 6, blue bars), which could be explained by the presence of ATXSVMPIII-04 and BILSVMPIII-10 isoforms amongst the most expressed SVMPs of B. atrox and B. b. smaragdinus, respectively. These two isoforms present similar primary structures sharing more than 90% identity with Jararhagin and Batroxrhagin [48], known to be multifunctional hemorrhagic metalloproteinases, conserved in venoms of several species of vipers [31]. B. hyoprora and B. taeniatus presented the highest PLA2 activity (Figure 7, yellow bars), probably due to the high catalytic activity of acidic PLA2, dominant in both venoms. In opposition, B. brazili venom presented the highest content of PLA2 isoforms but a very low catalytic activity, which could be attributed to the lack of catalytic activity in the K49-PLA2 homologs abundant in this venom [49]. Considering SVSPs, B. brazili venom contained a high catalytic activity, which agrees with the highest abundance of SVSPs in the venom proteome. However, B. hyoprora had the lowest proportion of SVSPs in the venom proteome but presented the highest activity indicating a high specific activity of the single isoform expressed in the venom. Interestingly, B. taeniatus venom contained a very low catalytic SVSP activity, which agrees with the lack of procoagulant [50] or defibrinating [51] activities previously reported for this venom.
All species studied here present a generalist diet in their first ontogenetic stages, feeding on small ectothermic prey, changing to a more specialist diet when they became larger and mainly prey on small rodents [52]. To estimate the lethality of these venoms we decided to use the percent survival time of experimental mice injected with lethal amounts of venom. Usually, venoms of Bothrops species present LD50 values below 100 µg venom/mice [53]. Thus, we initially injected groups of five mice with 100 µg venom/mice. Interestingly, the lethality of the tested venoms in the experimental mice was not high and no animal died with such dose. Injection of 300 μg of venoms of B. hyoprora, B. taeniatus, B. atrox, and B. b. smaragdinus was partially sufficient to promote the death of the experimental mice over 48 h. In such conditions, only B. brazili venom promoted the death of all animals in less than 3 h (Figure 7). Unfortunately, due to the limited amount of venom available and the high quantity used in the test, the experiment was not repeated, giving only an indication that B. brazili venom could be more lethal to mice. The differences in B. brazili venom that could correspond to its higher lethality are not evident. However, it is reasonable to assume that the higher amounts of K49-PLA2s and SVSPs in B. brazili venom could favor its higher lethal activity. High concentrations of myotoxic PLA2s have been related to the rapid immobilization of mammals, preventing them from moving away [54], while procoagulant SVSPs participate in the impairment of hemostasis in mammalian and avian prey [55]. Moreover, the neutralization of B. asper venom lethality in mice correlated with the neutralization of in vitro coagulant activity, not necessarily involving the SVMPs [56]. Thus, SVSPs and myotoxic PLA2s venom could correspond to the higher lethality in the experimental mice in B. brazili. Interestingly, B. atrox snakes that show the widest distribution in all the Amazon Forest have venoms with the least capacity to kill small rodents, and this is not a feature of B. atrox from Alto Juruá since the venoms of snakes collected in different habitats of the Pará state also presented high LD50 doses [9].
Among the species studied here, B. atrox is responsible for most human snakebite envenoming in the Amazon region [57,58] followed by B. b. smaragdinus, which is involved in human accidents caused mainly during activities within forests, such as the opening up of new trails or collecting fruits of the acai palm. Snakebites by B. brazili, B. taeniatus, and B. hyoprora are rarely reported but their potential harm to humans should not be ignored. Although accidents with these species are not frequent, some clinical signs could be foreseen based on the toxins detected by proteomics. The toxin groups detected here match the composition of venoms from different species of Bothrops, suggesting that in human accidents with the species studied here, there will be potential local and systemic signs and symptoms related to coagulant activities and hemorrhagic and inflammatory effects [50,59]. Indeed, a single report of a human accident with B. taeniatus described that the patient developed a clinical picture compatible with mild envenomation by B. atrox with small bleeding at the bite site and edema just below the knee without development of coagulopathy [60]. Also, even when collected outside the Brazilian territory, the activities of the B. bilineatus and B. taeniatus venoms are dominated by high proteolytic action on thrombin, plasmin, kallikrein, and cathepsin C [61]. Predicting signs of envenoming according to the abundance of toxin groups, the presence of basic PLA2s indicates the possibility of severe muscle damage in patients bitten by B. brazili and very low myotoxicity in patients bitten by B. hyoprora or B. taeniatus. On the other hand, the acidic PLA2 isoforms dominant in B. hyoprora or B. taeniatus venom predict anticoagulant activity in these venoms. In addition, the high proportions of CTL in the venoms of B. b. smaragdinus, B. atrox, and B. taeniatus collected in Acre indicates hemostatic disturbances involving platelet activation [62] that may result in their depletion aggravated by anticoagulation as CTLs may be potent inhibitors of thrombin [63,64,65].
The recommended treatment for snakebites is the use of heterologous antivenoms. Based on the similarity among venoms of Bothrops snakes, commercial antivenom in Brazil is produced via horse immunization with a pool of Bothrops venoms (Bothrops alternatus, Bothrops jararaca, Bothrops jararacussu, Bothrops moojeni, and Bothrops neuwiedi) [66] that does not include venoms of any species from the Amazon. Therefore, we tested the reactivity and neutralization of the commercial Bothrops antivenom produced in Brazil against the venoms of B. b. smaragdinus, B. atrox, B. brazili, B. taeniatus, and B. hyoprora snakes. As shown in Figure 8A, similar ELISA titration curves of the antivenom were observed in plates coated with the different venoms from Acre and against B. jararaca venom, which is the major immunogen included in the production of Bothrops antivenom in Brazil. Accordingly, via Western blotting we observed that the commercial antivenom recognized bands of higher molecular masses in all venoms; however, the recognition of bands below 20 kDa was feeble (Figure 8C). Despite that, SAB completely neutralized the lethality of all tested venoms. Similar data were reported by Muniz and coworkers [67], showing that the commercial antivenom preferentially recognized components with a relative mass above 66 kDa and that it neutralized the lethal, hemorrhagic, myotoxic, and phospholipase A2 activities induced by B. brazili venom. The reactivity of Bothrops antivenom with B. brazili and B. b. smaragdinus was also confirmed via antivenomics [23,24]. The commercial antivenom showed paraspecific immunoreactivity against all the toxin classes of B. b. smaragdinus and B. brazili venoms, with maximal binding to PI- and PIII-class SVMPs but diminished reactivity against B. brazili PLA2s, which comprise the major toxin class of the B. brazili [23]. In addition, Muniz et al. [68] reported that the Brazilian Bothrops antivenom neutralized the lethal activity of venoms from B. brazili, B. taeniatus, B. atrox, and B. b. smaragdinus, also supporting our data. Taken together, these data suggest that Brazilian Bothrops antivenom can be used against the species collected in the Amazon, supporting its efficacy in the treatment of human accidents involving those rare species of bothropoids.

3. Conclusions

Venom composition can be considered a trophic adaptation in some groups of snakes and has become an important model system for understanding ecological and evolutionary processes that underlie adaptive traits. The toxic arsenal comprised in snake venoms is mostly composed of proteins that belong to a few protein families [69], which are represented by several different isoforms with variable proportions [31]. The differences in isoform presence and proportion modulate the venom function [70]. Therefore, it is tempting to assume that the complexity of snake venoms is ecologically shaped, and it is crucial for the foraging success. Moreover, snake venom complexity does not appear to be phylogenetically constrained [71], but evolves in association with the diversity of diet items [72]. Also, ecological pressures have been associated with factors driving optimal solutions that resulted in the combination of a few major toxin families [73]. The evolution of this optimal set of toxins resulted in the snake venom variability found at different levels, like populational, geographic, and ontogenetic levels. In this study, we characterized the venom composition of five bothropoids. Our results highlighted substantial differences among venom composition; however, they did not offer any evidence that venom composition can be associated with different habitats (arboreal vs. terrestrial), or abundance (abundant vs. rare). Comparing species with the same habitat, the venom of B. taeniatus appeared to be more complex than the venom of B. b. smaragdinus, but the latter presented SVMP and PLA2 isoforms related to the most striking activities of the venoms of Bothrops snakes: the myotoxic K49-PLA2 [49] and the jararhagin-like SVMP [48]. On the other hand, B. b. smaragdinus shared a similar composition with the mainly terrestrial B. atrox, including the enzymatic activities and the presence of relevant isoforms. Another point to be considered is the role of venom toxicity in shaping the success of a species occupying different ecological niches. Bothrops atrox is the most abundant venomous snake in the Amazonian territory; however, it apparently presents one of the simplest and least lethal venoms. Therefore, our results tend to indicate that venom composition might not shape the species’ ecological constraints. Consequently, other biotic (e.g., competition and prey availability) or abiotic factors (e.g., temperature and humidity) may have a greater influence on snake foraging habits and dispersal capacities than the composition or toxicity of their venoms.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Snakes and Venoms

Two specimens of B. hyoprora, three specimens of B. b. smaragdinus, three specimens of B. brazili, three specimens of B. atrox, and one specimen of B. taeniatus were collected in the Alto Juruá region, in the municipalities of Mâncio Lima and Sena Madureira, Acre State of Brazil, and Guajará, Amazonas State of Brazil, under ICMBio/SISBIO permits 12178, 66367, and 65653. Sex and snout-vent length (SVL) were annotated for each specimen and are depicted in Table 2. Venom samples were collected using manual extraction techniques soon after snake capture, without any previous feeding at the lab. Venom samples were individually freeze-dried and kept at −80 °C until used. For proteomics and functional tests, venoms were resuspended in PBS, protein quantities estimated with OD 280 nm, and equal amounts of venom proteins mixed to perform the pool of venom representing each species. Four days after venom extraction, venom glands were dissected and immediately transferred to RNALater (Invitrogen, Life Technologies Corp.) and stored at −80 °C until RNA extraction and mRNA isolation.

4.2. Venom Fractionation by Reverse Phase Chromatography

Venom samples (2 mg) dissolved in 500 mL 0.1% trifluoroacetic acid (TFA) were fractionated on a reverse-phase column (Jupiter Phenomenex, 10 µm C18 300 Å, 250 × 10 mm) via HPLC (Shimadzu, Japan), as previously described [9]. The parameters for elution were 2 mL/min flow, with a gradient of 0.1% TFA in water (solution A) or in acetonitrile (solution B) as follows: 5% B for 5 min, followed by 5 to 15% B over 10 min, 15 to 45% B over 60 min, 45 to 70% B over 10 min, 70 to 100% B over 5 min, and 100% B over 10 min. Detection was performed with UV at 214 nm.

4.3. Transcriptome

4.3.1. RNA Extraction and Analysis; cDNA Library Construction and Sequencing

The RNA was extracted as previously described [74]. RNA extraction, quantification, quality control, and library preparation were carried out as previously described [75]. Briefly, libraries were prepared with 1 µg of each sample with an Illumina TruSeq Stranded RNA HT kit consisting of TruSeq Stranded RNA HT/cDNA Synthesis PCR, TruSeq Stranded RNA HT/Adapter Plate Box, and TruSeq Stranded HT mRNA. Fragment size distributions were evaluated via microfluidic gel electrophoresis using an Agilent DNA 1000 Kit. Quantification of each library was then performed with real-time PCR using a KAPA SYBR FAST Universal qPCR Kit, using the StepOnePlus Real-Time PCR System. Aliquots of each cDNA library were diluted to a concentration of 2 nM. The cDNA libraries were sequenced on an Illumina HiSeq 1500 System in Rapid Run mode using a paired-end flow cell for 300 cycles of 2 × 150 bp.

4.3.2. Transcriptome Assembly and Annotation

To assemble the venom transcriptomes of the samples, we used an in-house script [35], trimmed the sequencing adaptors using TrimGalore [76], and merged the paired reads using PEAR software v0.9.8 [77] by the common overlap on the 3′ ends [34]. We used five different assemblers with different k-mer values and assembly parameters (Trinity: k-mer 31; rnaSPADES: k-mer 31, 75, and 127; Extender: default, overlap 150, and seed size 2000; SeqMan Ngen: k-mer 21; and Bridger: k-mer 30) [34,35,78,79,80]. Coverage analysis and annotation were performed as described in [75]. The coding sequences annotated from all individuals of the same species were grouped into a single file at 98% identity using cd-hit-est [35,81] and the expression of each transcript was estimated in transcripts per million (TPM) using the RSEM software v1.3.3 [81] after mapping the merged reads from each sample using Bowtie2. Raw transcriptomic data are available at NCBI’s GenBank under Bioproject accession number PRJNA 1040254 and Biosamples accession number SAMN38250442 to 38250451.

4.4. Proteomic Analysis of Venoms

4.4.1. Analysis via In-Solution Trypsin Digestion and LC−MS/MS

Proteomic analysis was carried out with 30 μg of pooled venom samples from each species according to the methods currently used in our laboratory [82] with small modifications. Proteins were digested with trypsin using the Filter Aided Sample Preparation (FASP) [83], and the peptide mixtures were desalted using the stage tip approach [84] with C18 SDB-XC membranes (EmporeTM) (Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). LC−MS/MS analyses were performed in a Vanquish Neo (Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) UPLC system coupled to an Orbitrap Exploris 480™ mass spectrometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). Samples were injected in a PepMap™ Neo (Thermo Scientific) precolumn containing 5 mm of 5 µm C18 beads, and the chromatographic separation of the peptides was performed in a PepMap™ Neo analytical column (Thermo Scientific) containing 150 mm of 2 µm C18 beads using a gradient of acetonitrile/0.1% formic acid with steps of 2–45% in 55 min, 45–99% in 0.1 min, and 99% for 5 min, under a flow of 300 nL/min. The mass spectrometer was adjusted to operate at 2 kV in positive mode and the transfer tube temperature was set to 270 °C, operated in Data Dependent Acquisition, using high-energy collision-induced dissociation, with a resolution of 120,000 for MS1 fragments, with a normalized AGC target of 300%, maximum inject time was set to auto, and 15,000 for MS2 fragments. The scanning range was established for the window of 200–2000 m/z and positive charge states of 2–5. Mass spectrometry data were deposited via the PRIDE [85] repository. Data are available via ProteomeXchange with identifier PXD046872.

4.4.2. Identification and Relative Quantification

Raw data were processed and searched using the search tool Peaks (Version 10.5) against an in-house database consisting of the protein sequences predicted from a nonredundant transcriptome master set of the same specimens used for venom extraction, using the same parameters as previously described [75]. Scaffold (version Scaffold_5.2.1) was used to validate MS/MS-based peptide and protein identifications. Peptide identifications were accepted if they could be established at greater than 95.0% probability via the Peptide Prophet algorithm [86] with Scaffold delta-mass correction. Protein probabilities were assigned with the Protein Prophet algorithm [87]. The Normalized Spectral Abundance Factor (NSAF) quantitative method was used to estimate the general abundance of independent isoforms and toxin groups.

4.5. Sequence Alignments and Gene Tree Analyses

Complete cDNA sequences were translated into their predicted proteins (expasy.ch, translate tools) and subjected to phylogenetic constructions partitioned into four groups according to their toxin groups: 1—SVMPs; 2—SVSPs; 3—PLA2; and 4—CTLs. In each group, we included protein sequences to root the trees: for SVMPs, ADAM 28 from Mus musculus (NCBI_NP_899222.1); for SVSPs, the thrombin-like toxin from Ophiophagus Hannah (GenBank: ABN72544.1); for PLA2, a PLA sequence from Ophiophagus Hanna (GenBank: AAG17443.1); and for CTL, a C-Type lectin from Pseudonaja Textilis (GenBank: ABP94087.1). Trees were assembled using the NGPhylogeny.fr interface [88,89]. Protein sequences were aligned with the iterative refinement method E-INS-i using a BLOSUM62 scoring matrix as implemented in MAFFT 7.407_1 [90], and alignment curation was performed via BMGE 1.12_1 [91]. Maximum likelihood (ML) phylogenetic trees were estimated using PhyML 3.3_1 [92,93] and rendered with Newick Display 1.6 [94] and iTOL 6.8_1 [95].

4.6. Enzymatic Assays

SVMP, SVSP, and PLA2 enzymatic activities of pooled venoms from each species were assayed using synthetic substrates as previously described [9]. The results represent the mean ± SD of three independent experiments, undertaken in triplicate.

4.7. Reactivity with Antivenoms

The reactivity of the Bothrops antivenom with the venoms from the different species was evaluated with ELISA and Western blotting as previously described [71].

4.8. Lethality Test

The lethality induced by the venoms was tested in Swiss mice with 18–20 g body weight with protocols approved by the Animal Ethical Use Committees of the Instituto Butantan (CEUA nº 4222230223—ID 003103). Groups of 5 mice were injected intraperitoneally with a single dose (300 μg) of venom samples, diluted in 500 μL of PBS. Following injection, the times of death for each group were recorded at 30, 60, 90, 150, 180, 240, and 360 min, and then at 12, 24, and 48 h after inoculation of the samples. After 48 h, the surviving animals were euthanized, using a CO2 chamber. For neutralization tests, venoms (300 μg) were preincubated with 240 μL Bothrops antivenom at 37 °C for 30 min, centrifuged at 12,000 rpm, and the supernatant was used in the tests as described above. The data obtained were graphed on a survival curve plot in a linear scale up to 6 h, as no death was recorded after this time.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/toxins16020083/s1, Supplementary Table S1. Transcriptomic data of the specimens used in this study; Supplementary Table S2. Tryptic peptides of B. taeniatus, B. bilineatus smaragdinus, B. atrox, B. brazili, and Bothrocophyas hyoprora venoms identified with LC-MS/MS.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, L.A.F.-d.-S., A.M.M.-d.-S., P.S.B., M.A.S., J.S. and W.M.M.; methodology, M.C., V.C.S., J.P.C.S., A.M.-d.-S., M.R.N.A., R.A.M. and W.L.F.; data collection, M.C., V.C.S., J.P.C.S., A.M.-d.-S., M.R.N.A., R.A.M. and W.L.F.; data curation, M.C., S.M.T.S., L.A.F.-d.-S., and V.C.S.; writing—original draft preparation, A.M.M.-d.-S., L.A.F.-d.-S. and S.M.T.S.; writing—review and editing, M.A.S., J.S., P.S.B., W.M.M., F.G.G. and I.L.M.J.-d.-A.; supervision, L.A.F.-d.-S., F.G.G. and P.S.B.; funding acquisition, I.L.M.J.-d.-A., P.S.B. and A.M.M.-d.-S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa de São Paulo (FAPESP 2022/10344-8; 2016/50127-5; 2013/07467-1; 2021/13939; 2022/12660-4), Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq) (grant number 303958/2018-9 to AMMS; 304532/2013-4 to ILMJA; 311509/2020-7 to PSB; 312016/2021-2 and 405518/2021-8 to FGG), CNPq/MCTI/FNDCT nº 39/2022 (JAGS 311434/2021–5), Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado do Amazonas-FAPEAM (01.02.016301.03340/2021-69), and Governo Federal, CNPq (Processo 401519/2023-6), Governo do Estado do Acre/FAPAC, CONFAP.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The animal study protocol was approved by the Institutional Review Board Animal Ethical Use Committees of the Instituto Butantan (CEUA nº 4222230223—ID 003103, 31 October 2023).” for studies involving animals. Snake collections for venom extraction were carried out under ICMBio/SISBIO permits 12178, 66367, and 65653.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Proteomics raw data are available via ProteomeXchange with identifier PXD046872. Raw transcriptomic data are available at NCBI’s GenBank under Bioproject accession number PRJNA1040254 and Biosamples accession number at SAMN38250442 to 38250451.

Acknowledgments

We thank the team of students and technicians associated with the Laboratório de Coleções Zoológicas (LCZ—Instituto Butantan) for the assistance in the field and for processing the biological material used in this study. We acknowledge the BIOMASS—Core Facility for Scientific Research-USP, São Paulo, Brazil (CEFAP-USP) and the Center of Toxins, Immune-Response, and Cell Signaling (CeTICS) for spectrometry analysis.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest. The funders had no role in the design of this study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript; or in the decision to publish the results.

References

  1. Guedes, T.; Entiauspe, O.; Costa, H. Lista de répteis do Brasil: Atualização de 2022. Herpetol. Bras. 2023, 12, 56–161. [Google Scholar]
  2. Bernarde, P.; Turci, L.; Machado, R. Serpentes do Alto Juruá, Acre—Amazônia Brasileira; EDUFAC, Ed.; EDUFAC: Rio Branco, AC, Brazil, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  3. Silveira, M.; Torezan, J.; Daly, D. Vegetação e Diversidade Arbórea da Região do Alto Juruá. In Enciclopédia da Floresta: O Alto Juruá: Práticas e Conhecimento das Populações; Cunha, M., Almeida, M., Eds.; Companhia das Letras: São Paulo, Brazil, 2002; p. 735. [Google Scholar]
  4. Ab’Saber, A.N. The Paleoclimate and Paleoecology of Brazilian Amazonia. In Biological Diversification in the Tropics; Prance, G.T., Ed.; Columbia University Press: New York, NY, USA, 1982; pp. 41–59. [Google Scholar]
  5. Campbell, J.A.; Lamar, W.W. The Venomous Reptiles of the Western Hemisphere; Comstock Pub. Associates: Ithaca, NY, USA, 2004. [Google Scholar]
  6. Daltry, J.C.; Wüster, W.; Thorpe, R.S. Diet and snake venom evolution. Nature 1996, 379, 537–540. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Barlow, A.; Pook, C.E.; Harrison, R.A.; Wüster, W. Coevolution of diet and prey-specific venom activity supports the role of selection in snake venom evolution. Proc. Biol. Sci. 2009, 276, 2443–2449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Cipriani, V.; Debono, J.; Goldenberg, J.; Jackson, T.N.W.; Arbuckle, K.; Dobson, J.; Koludarov, I.; Li, B.; Hay, C.; Dunstan, N.; et al. Correlation between ontogenetic dietary shifts and venom variation in Australian brown snakes (Pseudonaja). Comp. Biochem. Physiol. Part C Toxicol. Pharmacol. 2017, 197, 53–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Sousa, L.F.; Portes-Junior, J.A.; Nicolau, C.A.; Bernardoni, J.L.; Nishiyama, M.Y., Jr.; Amazonas, D.R.; Freitas-de-Sousa, L.A.; Mourao, R.H.V.; Chalkidis, H.M.; Valente, R.H.; et al. Functional proteomic analyses of Bothrops atrox venom reveals phenotypes associated with habitat variation in the Amazon. J. Proteom. 2017, 159, 32–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Margres, M.J.; Wray, K.P.; Seavy, M.; McGivern, J.J.; Sanader, D.; Rokyta, D.R. Phenotypic integration in the feeding system of the eastern diamondback rattlesnake (Crotalus adamanteus). Mol. Ecol. 2015, 24, 3405–3420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Schonour, R.B.; Huff, E.M.; Holding, M.L.; Claunch, N.M.; Ellsworth, S.A.; Hogan, M.P.; Wray, K.; McGivern, J.; Margres, M.J.; Colston, T.J.; et al. Gradual and Discrete Ontogenetic Shifts in Rattlesnake Venom Composition and Assessment of Hormonal and Ecological Correlates. Toxins 2020, 12, 659. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Hatakeyama, D.M.; Tasima, L.J.; Bravo-Tobar, C.A.; Serino-Silva, C.; Tashima, A.K.; Rodrigues, C.F.B.; Aguiar, W.D.S.; Galizio, N.D.C.; de Lima, E.O.V.; Kavazoi, V.K.; et al. Venom complexity of Bothrops atrox (common lancehead) siblings. J. Venom. Anim. Toxins Incl. Trop. Dis. 2020, 26, e20200018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Alape-Girón, A.; Sanz, L.; Escolano, J.; Flores-Díaz, M.; Madrigal, M.; Sasa, M.; Calvete, J.J. Snake venomics of the lancehead pitviper Bothrops asper: Geographic, individual, and ontogenetic variations. J. Proteome Res. 2008, 7, 3556–3571. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Durban, J.; Pérez, A.; Sanz, L.; Gómez, A.; Bonilla, F.; Rodríguez, S.; Chacón, D.; Sasa, M.; Angulo, Y.; Gutiérrez, J.M.; et al. Integrated “omics” profiling indicates that miRNAs are modulators of the ontogenetic venom composition shift in the Central American rattlesnake, Crotalus simus simus. BMC Genom. 2013, 14, 234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. López-Lozano, J.L.; de Sousa, M.V.; Ricart, C.A.; Chávez-Olortegui, C.; Flores Sanchez, E.; Muniz, E.G.; Bührnheim, P.F.; Morhy, L. Ontogenetic variation of metalloproteinases and plasma coagulant activity in venoms of wild Bothrops atrox specimens from Amazonian rain forest. Toxicon 2002, 40, 997–1006. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Salazar, A.M.; Rodriguez-Acosta, A.; Girón, M.E.; Aguilar, I.; Guerrero, B. A comparative analysis of the clotting and fibrinolytic activities of the snake venom (Bothrops atrox) from different geographical areas in Venezuela. Thromb. Res. 2007, 120, 95–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Patiño, R.S.P.; Salazar-Valenzuela, D.; Medina-Villamizar, E.; Mendes, B.; Proaño-Bolaños, C.; da Silva, S.L.; Almeida, J.R. Bothrops atrox from Ecuadorian Amazon: Initial analyses of venoms from individuals. Toxicon 2021, 193, 63–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Dagda, R.K.; Gasanov, S.; De La Oiii, Y.; Rael, E.D.; Lieb, C.S. Genetic Basis for Variation of Metalloproteinase-Associated Biochemical Activity in Venom of the Mojave Rattlesnake (Crotalus scutulatus scutulatus). Biochem. Res. Int. 2013, 2013, 251474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Coutinho-Neto, A.; Caldeira, C.A.; Souza, G.H.; Zaqueo, K.D.; Kayano, A.M.; Silva, R.S.; Zuliani, J.P.; Soares, A.M.; Stábeli, R.G.; Calderon, L.A. ESI-MS/MS identification of a bradykinin-potentiating peptide from Amazon Bothrops atrox snake venom using a hybrid Qq-oaTOF mass spectrometer. Toxins 2013, 5, 327–335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Guércio, R.A.; Shevchenko, A.; López-Lozano, J.L.; Paba, J.; Sousa, M.V.; Ricart, C.A. Ontogenetic variations in the venom proteome of the Amazonian snake Bothrops atrox. Proteome Sci. 2006, 4, 11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Kohlhoff, M.; Borges, M.H.; Yarleque, A.; Cabezas, C.; Richardson, M.; Sanchez, E.F. Exploring the proteomes of the venoms of the Peruvian pit vipers Bothrops atrox, B. barnetti and B. pictus. J. Proteom. 2012, 75, 2181–2195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Núñez, V.; Cid, P.; Sanz, L.; De La Torre, P.; Angulo, Y.; Lomonte, B.; Gutiérrez, J.M.; Calvete, J.J. Snake venomics and antivenomics of Bothrops atrox venoms from Colombia and the Amazon regions of Brazil, Perú and Ecuador suggest the occurrence of geographic variation of venom phenotype by a trend towards paedomorphism. J. Proteom. 2009, 73, 57–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Sanz, L.; Pérez, A.; Quesada-Bernat, S.; Diniz-Sousa, R.; Calderón, L.A.; Soares, A.M.; Calvete, J.J.; Caldeira, C.A.S. Venomics and antivenomics of the poorly studied Brazil’s lancehead, Bothrops brazili (Hoge, 1954), from the Brazilian State of Pará. J. Venom. Anim. Toxins Incl. Trop. Dis. 2020, 26, e20190103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Sanz, L.; Quesada-Bernat, S.; Pérez, A.; De Morais-Zani, K.; Sant’Anna, S.S.; Hatakeyama, D.M.; Tasima, L.J.; De Souza, M.B.; Kayano, A.M.; Zavaleta, A.; et al. Danger in the Canopy. Comparative Proteomics and Bioactivities of the Venoms of the South American Palm Pit Viper. J. Proteome Res. 2020, 19, 3518–3532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Pereañez, J.A.; Preciado, L.M.; Fernández, J.; Camacho, E.; Lomonte, B.; Castro, F.; Cañas, C.A.; Galvis, C.; Castaño, S. Snake venomics, experimental toxic activities and clinical characteristics of human envenomation by Bothrocophias myersi (Serpentes: Viperidae) from Colombia. J. Proteom. 2020, 220, 103758. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Salazar-Valenzuela, D.; Mora-Obando, D.; Fernández, M.L.; Loaiza-Lange, A.; Gibbs, H.L.; Lomonte, B. Proteomic and toxicological profiling of the venom of Bothrocophias campbelli, a pitviper species from Ecuador and Colombia. Toxicon 2014, 90, 15–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Lomonte, B.; Díaz, C.; Chaves, F.; Fernández, J.; Ruiz, M.; Salas, M.; Zavaleta, A.; Calvete, J.J.; Sasa, M. Comparative characterization of Viperidae snake venoms from Perú reveals two compositional patterns of phospholipase A. Toxicon X 2020, 7, 100044. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Angulo, Y.; Escolano, J.; Lomonte, B.; Gutiérrez, J.M.; Sanz, L.; Calvete, J.J. Snake venomics of Central American pitvipers: Clues for rationalizing the distinct envenomation profiles of Atropoides nummifer and Atropoides picadoi. J. Proteome Res. 2008, 7, 708–719. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Calvete, J.J.; Borges, A.; Segura, A.; Flores-Díaz, M.; Alape-Girón, A.; Gutiérrez, J.M.; Diez, N.; De Sousa, L.; Kiriakos, D.; Sánchez, E.; et al. Snake venomics and antivenomics of Bothrops colombiensis, a medically important pitviper of the Bothrops atrox-asper complex endemic to Venezuela: Contributing to its taxonomy and snakebite management. J. Proteom. 2009, 72, 227–240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Lomonte, B.; Escolano, J.; Fernández, J.; Sanz, L.; Angulo, Y.; Gutiérrez, J.M.; Calvete, J.J. Snake venomics and antivenomics of the arboreal neotropical pitvipers Bothriechis lateralis and Bothriechis schlegelii. J. Proteome Res. 2008, 7, 2445–2457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Amazonas, D.R.; Portes-Junior, J.A.; Nishiyama-Jr, M.Y.; Nicolau, C.A.; Chalkidis, H.M.; Mourão, R.H.V.; Grazziotin, F.G.; Rokyta, D.R.; Gibbs, H.L.; Valente, R.H.; et al. Molecular mechanisms underlying intraspecific variation in snake venom. J. Proteom. 2018, 181, 60–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Durban, J.; Juárez, P.; Angulo, Y.; Lomonte, B.; Flores-Diaz, M.; Alape-Girón, A.; Sasa, M.; Sanz, L.; Gutiérrez, J.M.; Dopazo, J.; et al. Profiling the venom gland transcriptomes of Costa Rican snakes by 454 pyrosequencing. BMC Genom. 2011, 12, 259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Margres, M.J.; McGivern, J.J.; Wray, K.P.; Seavy, M.; Calvin, K.; Rokyta, D.R. Linking the transcriptome and proteome to characterize the venom of the eastern diamondback rattlesnake (Crotalus adamanteus). J. Proteom. 2014, 96, 145–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Rokyta, D.R.; Lemmon, A.R.; Margres, M.J.; Aronow, K. The venom-gland transcriptome of the eastern diamondback rattlesnake (Crotalus adamanteus). BMC Genom. 2012, 13, 312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Hofmann, E.P.; Rautsaw, R.M.; Strickland, J.L.; Holding, M.L.; Hogan, M.P.; Mason, A.J.; Rokyta, D.R.; Parkinson, C.L. Comparative venom-gland transcriptomics and venom proteomics of four Sidewinder Rattlesnake (Crotalus cerastes) lineages reveal little differential expression despite individual variation. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 15534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Calvete, J.J.; Domont, G.B. Omic technologies to fight the neglect. J. Proteom. 2011, 74, 1483–1484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Neiva, M.; Arraes, F.B.; de Souza, J.V.; Rádis-Baptista, G.; Prieto da Silva, A.R.; Walter, M.E.; Brigido, M.e.M.; Yamane, T.; López-Lozano, J.L.; Astolfi-Filho, S. Transcriptome analysis of the Amazonian viper Bothrops atrox venom gland using expressed sequence tags (ESTs). Toxicon 2009, 53, 427–436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Mason, A.J.; Margres, M.J.; Strickland, J.L.; Rokyta, D.R.; Sasa, M.; Parkinson, C.L. Trait differentiation and modular toxin expression in palm-pitvipers. BMC Genom. 2020, 21, 147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Barros, S.F.; Friedlanskaia, I.; Petricevich, V.L.; Kipnis, T.L. Local inflammation, lethality and cytokine release in mice injected with Bothrops atrox venom. Mediat. Inflamm. 1998, 7, 339–346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Cavinato, R.A.; Remold, H.; Kipnis, T.L. Purification and variability in thrombin-like activity of Bothrops atrox venom from different geographic regions. Toxicon 1998, 36, 257–267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Costal-Oliveira, F.; Stransky, S.; Guerra-Duarte, C.; Naves de Souza, D.L.; Vivas-Ruiz, D.E.; Yarlequé, A.; Sanchez, E.F.; Chávez-Olórtegui, C.; Braga, V.M.M. L-amino acid oxidase from Bothrops atrox snake venom triggers autophagy, apoptosis and necrosis in normal human keratinocytes. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 781. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Furtado, J.L.; Oliveira, G.A.; Pontes, A.S.; Setúbal, S.a.S.; Xavier, C.V.; Lacouth-Silva, F.; Lima, B.F.; Zaqueo, K.D.; Kayano, A.M.; Calderon, L.A.; et al. Activation of J77A.1 macrophages by three phospholipases A2 isolated from Bothrops atrox snake venom. Biomed. Res. Int. 2014, 2014, 683123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Moretto Del-Rei, T.H.; Sousa, L.F.; Rocha, M.M.T.; Freitas-de-Sousa, L.A.; Travaglia-Cardoso, S.R.; Grego, K.; Sant’Anna, S.S.; Chalkidis, H.M.; Moura-da-Silva, A.M. Functional variability of Bothrops atrox venoms from three distinct areas across the Brazilian Amazon and consequences for human envenomings. Toxicon 2019, 164, 61–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Andrade-Silva, D.; Zelanis, A.; Travaglia-Cardoso, S.R.; Nishiyama, M.Y.; Serrano, S.M.T. Venom Profiling of the Insular Species. J. Proteome Res. 2021, 20, 1341–1358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Freitas-de-Sousa, L.A.; Colombini, M.; Lopes-Ferreira, M.; Serrano, S.M.T.; Moura-da-Silva, A.M. Insights into the Mechanisms Involved in Strong Hemorrhage and Dermonecrosis Induced by Atroxlysin-Ia, a PI-Class Snake Venom Metalloproteinase. Toxins 2017, 9, 1341–1358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Sanchez, E.F.; Schneider, F.S.; Yarleque, A.; Borges, M.H.; Richardson, M.; Figueiredo, S.G.; Evangelista, K.S.; Eble, J.A. The novel metalloproteinase atroxlysin-I from Peruvian Bothrops atrox (Jergón) snake venom acts both on blood vessel ECM and platelets. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 2010, 496, 9–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Alencar, L.R.V.; Quental, T.B.; Grazziotin, F.G.; Alfaro, M.L.; Martins, M.; Venzon, M.; Zaher, H. Diversification in vipers: Phylogenetic relationships, time of divergence and shifts in speciation rates. Mol. Phylogenetics Evol. 2016, 105, 50–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Freitas-de-Sousa, L.A.; Amazonas, D.R.; Sousa, L.F.; Sant’Anna, S.S.; Nishiyama, M.Y., Jr.; Serrano, S.M.T.; Junqueira-de-Azevedo, I.L.M.; Chalkidis, H.M.; Moura-da-Silva, A.M.; Mourao, R.H.V. Comparison of venoms from wild and long-term captive Bothrops atrox snakes and characterization of Batroxrhagin, the predominant class PIII metalloproteinase from the venom of this species. Biochimie 2015, 118, 60–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Lomonte, B.; Rangel, J. Snake venom Lys49 myotoxins: From phospholipases A2 to non-enzymatic membrane disruptors. Toxicon 2012, 60, 520–530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Bourke, L.A.; Zdenek, C.N.; Tanaka-Azevedo, A.M.; Silveira, G.P.M.; Sant’Anna, S.S.; Grego, K.F.; Rodrigues, C.F.B.; Fry, B.G. Clinical and Evolutionary Implications of Dynamic Coagulotoxicity Divergences in. Toxins 2022, 14, 297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Furtado, M.F.; Cardoso, S.T.; Soares, O.E.; Pereira, A.P.; Fernandes, D.S.; Tambourgi, D.V.; Sant’Anna, O.A. Antigenic cross-reactivity and immunogenicity of Bothrops venoms from snakes of the Amazon region. Toxicon 2010, 55, 881–887. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Martins, M.; Marques, O.A.V.; Sazima, I.; Schuett, G.; Höggren, M.; Green, H.W. Ecological and phylogenetic correlates of feeding habits in Neotropicalpitvipers of the genus Bothrops. Biol. Vipers 2002, 307, 328. [Google Scholar]
  53. Segura, A.; Castillo, M.C.; Núñez, V.; Yarlequé, A.; Gonçalves, L.R.; Villalta, M.; Bonilla, C.; Herrera, M.; Vargas, M.; Fernández, M.; et al. Preclinical assessment of the neutralizing capacity of antivenoms produced in six Latin American countries against medically-relevant Bothrops snake venoms. Toxicon 2010, 56, 980–989. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Mackessy, S.P. Evolutionary trends in venom composition in the western rattlesnakes (Crotalus viridis sensu lato): Toxicity vs. tenderizers. Toxicon 2010, 55, 1463–1474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Kini, R.M. Serine proteases affecting blood coagulation and fibrinolysis from snake venoms. Pathophysiol. Haemost. Thromb. 2005, 34, 200–204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Chacón, F.; Oviedo, A.; Escalante, T.; Solano, G.; Rucavado, A.; Gutiérrez, J.M. The lethality test used for estimating the potency of antivenoms against Bothrops asper snake venom: Pathophysiological mechanisms, prophylactic analgesia, and a surrogate in vitro assay. Toxicon 2015, 93, 41–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Cañas, C.A. Brainstem ischemic stroke after to Bothrops atrox snakebite. Toxicon 2016, 120, 124–127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Kallel, H.; Mayence, C.; Houcke, S.; Mathien, C.; Mehdaoui, H.; Gutiérrez, J.M.; Megarbane, B.; Hommel, D.; Resiere, D. Severe snakebite envenomation in French Guiana: When antivenom is not available. Toxicon 2018, 146, 87–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. França, F.O.; Barbaro, K.C.; Fan, H.W.; Cardoso, J.L.; Sano-Martins, I.S.; Tomy, S.C.; Lopes, M.H.; Warrell, D.A.; Theakston, R.D.; Butantan Institute Antivenom Study Group. Envenoming by Bothrops jararaca in Brazil: Association between venom antigenaemia and severity at admission to hospital. Trans. R. Soc. Trop. Med. Hyg. 2003, 97, 312–317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Torrez, P.Q.; Duarte, M.R.; França, F.O.; Figueiredo, L.; Abati, P.; Campos, L.R.; Pardal, P.P.; Quiroga, M.; Mascheretti, M.; Boulos, M. First report of an accident with the speckled forest pit viper (Bothriopsis taeniata) in Brazil. Rev. Soc. Bras. Med. Trop. 2009, 42, 342–344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  61. Porto, B.N.; Telli, C.A.; Dutra, T.P.; Alves, L.S.; Bozza, M.T.; Fin, C.A.; Thiesen, F.V.; Renner, M.F. Biochemical and biological characterization of the venoms of Bothriopsis bilineata and Bothriopsis taeniata (Serpentes: Viperidae). Toxicon 2007, 50, 270–277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Arlinghaus, F.T.; Eble, J.A. C-type lectin-like proteins from snake venoms. Toxicon 2012, 60, 512–519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Zingali, R.B.; Ferreira, M.S.; Assafim, M.; Frattani, F.S.; Monteiro, R.Q. Bothrojaracin, a Bothrops jararaca snake venom-derived (pro)thrombin inhibitor, as an anti-thrombotic molecule. Pathophysiol. Haemost. Thromb. 2005, 34, 160–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Gartner, T.K.; Stocker, K.; Williams, D.C. Thrombolectin: A lectin isolated from Bothrops atrox venom. FEBS Lett. 1980, 117, 13–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Tani, A.; Ogawa, T.; Nose, T.; Nikandrov, N.N.; Deshimaru, M.; Chijiwa, T.; Chang, C.C.; Fukumaki, Y.; Ohno, M. Characterization, primary structure and molecular evolution of anticoagulant protein from Agkistrodon actus venom. Toxicon 2002, 40, 803–813. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Butantan, I. Soro Antibotrópico Pentavalente. Available online: https://butantan.gov.br/assets/arquivos/soros-e-vacinas/soros/Soro%20antibotrópico-crotálico.pdf (accessed on 25 November 2023).
  67. Muniz, E.G.; Sano-Martins, I.S.; Saraiva, M.D.G.G.; Monteiro, W.M.; Magno, E.S.; Oliveira, S.S. Biological characterization of the Bothrops brazili snake venom and its neutralization by Brazilian Bothrops antivenom produced by the Butantan Institute. Toxicon 2023, 223, 107010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Muniz, E.G.; Maria, W.S.; Estevão-Costa, M.I.; Buhrnheim, P.; Chávez-Olórtegui, C. Neutralizing potency of horse antibothropic Brazilian antivenom against Bothrops snake venoms from the Amazonian rain forest. Toxicon 2000, 38, 1859–1863. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Calvete, J.J.; Juárez, P.; Sanz, L. Snake venomics. Strategy and applications. J. Mass Spectrom. 2007, 42, 1405–1414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Bernardoni, J.L.; Sousa, L.F.; Wermelinger, L.S.; Lopes, A.S.; Prezoto, B.C.; Serrano, S.M.T.; Zingali, R.B.; Moura-da-Silva, A.M. Functional Variability of Snake Venom Metalloproteinases: Adaptive Advantages in Targeting Different Prey and Implications for Human Envenomation. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e109651. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Sousa, L.F.; Nicolau, C.A.; Peixoto, P.S.; Bernardoni, J.L.; Oliveira, S.S.; Portes-Junior, J.A.; Mourao, R.H.V.; Lima-dos-Santos, I.; Sano-Martins, I.S.; Chalkidis, H.M.; et al. Comparison of Phylogeny, Venom Composition and Neutralization by Antivenom in Diverse Species of Bothrops Complex. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 2013, 7, e2442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Holding, M.L.; Strickland, J.L.; Rautsaw, R.M.; Hofmann, E.P.; Mason, A.J.; Hogan, M.P.; Nystrom, G.S.; Ellsworth, S.A.; Colston, T.J.; Borja, M.; et al. Phylogenetically diverse diets favor more complex venoms in North American pitvipers. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2021, 118, e2015579118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Barua, A.; Mikheyev, A.S. Many Options, Few Solutions: Over 60 My Snakes Converged on a Few Optimal Venom Formulations. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2019, 36, 1964–1974. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Chomczynski, P.; Sacchi, N. Single-step method of RNA isolation by acid guanidinium thiocyanate-phenol-chloroform extraction. Anal. Biochem. 1987, 162, 156–159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Nachtigall, P.G.; Freitas-de-Sousa, L.A.; Mason, A.J.; Moura-da-Silva, A.M.; Grazziotin, F.G.; Junqueira-de-Azevedo, I.L.M. Differences in PLA. Toxins 2022, 14, 237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Krueger, F. Trim Galore!: A Wrapper Tool around Cutadapt and FastQC to Consistently Apply Quality and Adapter Trimming to FastQ Files. 2015. Available online: https://www.bioinformatics.babraham.ac.uk/projects/trim_galore/ (accessed on 10 November 2022).
  77. Zhang, J.; Kobert, K.; Flouri, T.; Stamatakis, A. PEAR: A fast and accurate Illumina Paired-End reAd mergeR. Bioinformatics 2014, 30, 614–620. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Grabherr, M.G.; Haas, B.J.; Yassour, M.; Levin, J.Z.; Thompson, D.A.; Amit, I.; Adiconis, X.; Fan, L.; Raychowdhury, R.; Zeng, Q.; et al. Full-length transcriptome assembly from RNA-Seq data without a reference genome. Nat. Biotechnol. 2011, 29, 644–652. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Chang, Z.; Li, G.; Liu, J.; Zhang, Y.; Ashby, C.; Liu, D.; Cramer, C.L.; Huang, X. Bridger: A new framework for de novo transcriptome assembly using RNA-seq data. Genome Biol. 2015, 16, 30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Bushmanova, E.; Antipov, D.; Lapidus, A.; Prjibelski, A.D. rnaSPAdes: A de novo transcriptome assembler and its application to RNA-Seq data. Gigascience 2019, 8, giz100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  81. Li, B.; Dewey, C.N. RSEM: Accurate transcript quantification from RNA-Seq data with or without a reference genome. BMC Bioinform. 2011, 12, 323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Farias, I.B.; Morais-Zani, K.; Serino-Silva, C.; Sant’Anna, S.S.; Rocha, M.M.T.D.; Grego, K.F.; Andrade-Silva, D.; Serrano, S.M.T.; Tanaka-Azevedo, A.M. Functional and proteomic comparison of Bothrops jararaca venom from captive specimens and the Brazilian Bothropic Reference Venom. J. Proteom. 2018, 174, 36–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Wiśniewski, J.R.; Zougman, A.; Mann, M. Combination of FASP and StageTip-based fractionation allows in-depth analysis of the hippocampal membrane proteome. J. Proteome Res. 2009, 8, 5674–5678. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Rappsilber, J.; Mann, M.; Ishihama, Y. Protocol for micro-purification, enrichment, pre-fractionation and storage of peptides for proteomics using StageTips. Nat. Protoc. 2007, 2, 1896–1906. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Perez-Riverol, Y.; Csordas, A.; Bai, J.; Bernal-Llinares, M.; Hewapathirana, S.; Kundu, D.J.; Inuganti, A.; Griss, J.; Mayer, G.; Eisenacher, M.; et al. The PRIDE database and related tools and resources in 2019: Improving support for quantification data. Nucleic Acids Res 2019, 47, D442–D450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  86. Keller, A.; Nesvizhskii, A.I.; Kolker, E.; Aebersold, R. Empirical statistical model to estimate the accuracy of peptide identifications made by MS/MS and database search. Anal. Chem. 2002, 74, 5383–5392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Nesvizhskii, A.I.; Keller, A.; Kolker, E.; Aebersold, R. A statistical model for identifying proteins by tandem mass spectrometry. Anal. Chem. 2003, 75, 4646–4658. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Lemoine, F.; Correia, D.; Lefort, V.; Doppelt-Azeroual, O.; Mareuil, F.; Cohen-Boulakia, S.; Gascuel, O. NGPhylogeny.fr: New generation phylogenetic services for non-specialists. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019, 47, W260–W265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  89. Dereeper, A.; Guignon, V.; Blanc, G.; Audic, S.; Buffet, S.; Chevenet, F.; Dufayard, J.F.; Guindon, S.; Lefort, V.; Lescot, M.; et al. Phylogeny.fr: Robust phylogenetic analysis for the non-specialist. Nucleic Acids Res. 2008, 36, W465–W469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  90. Katoh, K.; Standley, D.M. MAFFT multiple sequence alignment software version 7: Improvements in performance and usability. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2013, 30, 772–780. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Criscuolo, A.; Gribaldo, S. BMGE (Block Mapping and Gathering with Entropy): A new software for selection of phylogenetic informative regions from multiple sequence alignments. BMC Evol. Biol. 2010, 10, 210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  92. Guindon, S.; Dufayard, J.F.; Lefort, V.; Anisimova, M.; Hordijk, W.; Gascuel, O. New algorithms and methods to estimate maximum-likelihood phylogenies: Assessing the performance of PhyML 3.0. Syst. Biol. 2010, 59, 307–321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  93. Lemoine, F.; Domelevo Entfellner, J.B.; Wilkinson, E.; Correia, D.; Dávila Felipe, M.; De Oliveira, T.; Gascuel, O. Renewing Felsenstein’s phylogenetic bootstrap in the era of big data. Nature 2018, 556, 452–456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  94. Junier, T.; Zdobnov, E.M. The Newick utilities: High-throughput phylogenetic tree processing in the UNIX shell. Bioinformatics 2010, 26, 1669–1670. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Letunic, I.; Bork, P. Interactive Tree Of Life (iTOL) v5: An online tool for phylogenetic tree display and annotation. Nucleic Acids Res. 2021, 49, W293–W296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Toxins 16 00083 g001
Figure 1. Representative specimens of the species used in this study: Bothrocophyas hyoprora (A); B. atrox (B); B. bilineatus smaragdinus (C); B. brazili (D); B. taeniatus (E); and geographical distribution of the collection areas (F). Pictures, (A,D): PS Bernarde; (C,F): WL Fonseca; and (E): MRN Almeida.
Figure 1. Representative specimens of the species used in this study: Bothrocophyas hyoprora (A); B. atrox (B); B. bilineatus smaragdinus (C); B. brazili (D); B. taeniatus (E); and geographical distribution of the collection areas (F). Pictures, (A,D): PS Bernarde; (C,F): WL Fonseca; and (E): MRN Almeida.
Toxins 16 00083 g001
Toxins 16 00083 g002
Figure 2. Comparison of the chromatographic profiles of venom samples from B. taeniatus; B. bilineatus smaragdinus; B. atrox; B. brazili; and Bothrocophyas hyoprora: Individual venom samples (2 mg) were applied to a C-18 column. Mobile phases used were 0.1% TFA in water (solution A) or 0.1% TFA in acetonitrile (solution B). Proteins were gradient eluted at 2 mL/min as depicted by the red line. Separation was monitored at 214 nm.
Figure 2. Comparison of the chromatographic profiles of venom samples from B. taeniatus; B. bilineatus smaragdinus; B. atrox; B. brazili; and Bothrocophyas hyoprora: Individual venom samples (2 mg) were applied to a C-18 column. Mobile phases used were 0.1% TFA in water (solution A) or 0.1% TFA in acetonitrile (solution B). Proteins were gradient eluted at 2 mL/min as depicted by the red line. Separation was monitored at 214 nm.
Toxins 16 00083 g002
Toxins 16 00083 g003aToxins 16 00083 g003b
Figure 3. Venom gland transcriptomes: B. taeniatus (A); B. bilineatus smaragdinus (B); B. atrox (C); B. brazili (D); and Bothrocophyas hyoprora (E). Bar plots and pie charts represent the average venom composition of each species classified by toxin class.
Figure 3. Venom gland transcriptomes: B. taeniatus (A); B. bilineatus smaragdinus (B); B. atrox (C); B. brazili (D); and Bothrocophyas hyoprora (E). Bar plots and pie charts represent the average venom composition of each species classified by toxin class.
Toxins 16 00083 g003aToxins 16 00083 g003b
Toxins 16 00083 g004aToxins 16 00083 g004b
Figure 4. Distribution of protein groups and isoforms in venom proteomes: B. taeniatus (A); B. bilineatus smaragdinus (B); B. atrox (C); B. brazili (D); and Bothrocophyas hyoprora (E). Bar plots and pie charts represent the average venom composition of each species run in triplicates, classified by toxin class. Relative expression is indicated as Normalized Spectral Abundance Factor (NSAF) quantitative method of Scaffold 5.0.
Figure 4. Distribution of protein groups and isoforms in venom proteomes: B. taeniatus (A); B. bilineatus smaragdinus (B); B. atrox (C); B. brazili (D); and Bothrocophyas hyoprora (E). Bar plots and pie charts represent the average venom composition of each species run in triplicates, classified by toxin class. Relative expression is indicated as Normalized Spectral Abundance Factor (NSAF) quantitative method of Scaffold 5.0.
Toxins 16 00083 g004aToxins 16 00083 g004b
Toxins 16 00083 g005aToxins 16 00083 g005b
Figure 5. Phylogenetic inferences of isoforms from the most abundant toxin groups: Complete deduced protein sequences of SVMPs (A), SVSPs (B), PLA2s (C), and CTL (D) were aligned using MAFF-T. The maximum likelihood phylogenetic tree was generated using PhyML. Bars represent the quantitative value (NSAF) of the isoforms detected via LC-MS/MS in each venom sample, which are represented by the different colors of the bars, as indicated in the figure.
Figure 5. Phylogenetic inferences of isoforms from the most abundant toxin groups: Complete deduced protein sequences of SVMPs (A), SVSPs (B), PLA2s (C), and CTL (D) were aligned using MAFF-T. The maximum likelihood phylogenetic tree was generated using PhyML. Bars represent the quantitative value (NSAF) of the isoforms detected via LC-MS/MS in each venom sample, which are represented by the different colors of the bars, as indicated in the figure.
Toxins 16 00083 g005aToxins 16 00083 g005b
Toxins 16 00083 g006
Figure 6. Enzymatic activities of B. taeniatus, B. bilineatus smaragdinus, B. atrox, B. brazili, and Bothrocophyas hyoprora venoms: SVMP catalytic activity was evaluated via hydrolysis of a FRET substrate (Abz-AGLA-EDDnp), and results are expressed as RFU/min/µg of venom. SVSP catalytic activity was evaluated via hydrolysis of the chromogenic synthetic substrate (L-BAPNA) and expressed in Abs/min/2 µg of venom. PLA2 activity was evaluated via hydrolysis of the chromogenic substrate (NOBA) and the results are expressed in Abs/min/10 µg of venom. The data shown represent the mean + SD of three independent experiments.
Figure 6. Enzymatic activities of B. taeniatus, B. bilineatus smaragdinus, B. atrox, B. brazili, and Bothrocophyas hyoprora venoms: SVMP catalytic activity was evaluated via hydrolysis of a FRET substrate (Abz-AGLA-EDDnp), and results are expressed as RFU/min/µg of venom. SVSP catalytic activity was evaluated via hydrolysis of the chromogenic synthetic substrate (L-BAPNA) and expressed in Abs/min/2 µg of venom. PLA2 activity was evaluated via hydrolysis of the chromogenic substrate (NOBA) and the results are expressed in Abs/min/10 µg of venom. The data shown represent the mean + SD of three independent experiments.
Toxins 16 00083 g006
Toxins 16 00083 g007
Figure 7. Lethality of B. taeniatus, B. bilineatus smaragdinus, B. atrox, B. brazili, and Bothrocophyas hyoprora venoms in murine models: Single doses of venom (300 μg) were injected i.p. into groups of five mice. Next, the deaths were followed up every hour until 6 h after, then at 12, 24, and 48 h after venom injection. The graphic shows the X axis only up to 6 h, as no death was recorded after this time.
Figure 7. Lethality of B. taeniatus, B. bilineatus smaragdinus, B. atrox, B. brazili, and Bothrocophyas hyoprora venoms in murine models: Single doses of venom (300 μg) were injected i.p. into groups of five mice. Next, the deaths were followed up every hour until 6 h after, then at 12, 24, and 48 h after venom injection. The graphic shows the X axis only up to 6 h, as no death was recorded after this time.
Toxins 16 00083 g007
Toxins 16 00083 g008
Figure 8. Reactivity of B. taeniatus (TAE), B. bilineatus smaragdinus (BBS), B. atrox (ATX), B. brazili (BRZ), and Bothrocophyas hyoprora (HYO) venoms with Bothrops commercial antivenom: For ELISA (A), venom samples (5 μg/mL) were coated to microplates (Nunc) and incubated with crescent dilutions of Bothrops commercial antivenom (starting from 1:2000), followed by incubation with anti-horse IgG labeled with peroxidase (1:2000). The reactions were developed with ortho-phenylenediamine/H2O2 as the enzyme substrate, and the products were detected at 490 nm. The experiment was repeated twice, and the Abs represents the mean ± SD of the two experiments. Next, venoms were fractionated via SDS-PAGE in 12.5% acrylamide gel under nonreducing conditions and were either stained with Coomassie blue (B) or transferred to nitrocellulose membranes, which were then incubated with the antivenom (1:2000) as the primary antibody and peroxidase-labeled goat anti-horse IgG (1:2000). The reactive bands were detected via incubation with 4-chloro-a-naphthol and H2O2 (C). The numbers at the left indicate the mobility of the molecular mass markers in kDa.
Figure 8. Reactivity of B. taeniatus (TAE), B. bilineatus smaragdinus (BBS), B. atrox (ATX), B. brazili (BRZ), and Bothrocophyas hyoprora (HYO) venoms with Bothrops commercial antivenom: For ELISA (A), venom samples (5 μg/mL) were coated to microplates (Nunc) and incubated with crescent dilutions of Bothrops commercial antivenom (starting from 1:2000), followed by incubation with anti-horse IgG labeled with peroxidase (1:2000). The reactions were developed with ortho-phenylenediamine/H2O2 as the enzyme substrate, and the products were detected at 490 nm. The experiment was repeated twice, and the Abs represents the mean ± SD of the two experiments. Next, venoms were fractionated via SDS-PAGE in 12.5% acrylamide gel under nonreducing conditions and were either stained with Coomassie blue (B) or transferred to nitrocellulose membranes, which were then incubated with the antivenom (1:2000) as the primary antibody and peroxidase-labeled goat anti-horse IgG (1:2000). The reactive bands were detected via incubation with 4-chloro-a-naphthol and H2O2 (C). The numbers at the left indicate the mobility of the molecular mass markers in kDa.
Toxins 16 00083 g008
Table 1. Number of toxin transcripts recovered from venom gland transcriptome of each species transcriptome grouped according to the toxin classes.
Table 1. Number of toxin transcripts recovered from venom gland transcriptome of each species transcriptome grouped according to the toxin classes.
Toxin Class *Bothrocophias hioproraBothrops atroxBothrops bilineatus smaragdinusBothrops braziliBothrops taeniatus
SVMP146171412
CTL41622915
SVSP12612137
PLA222534
VEGF32332
LAO02110
HYAL11110
CRISP11111
NGF11110
NUC10112
PDE21221
PLB11111
BPP10110
DIPEP10110
CYS10120
iPLA00110
LIPA10111
WAP10021
KUN10000
Total4839725847
* SVMP—Snake Venom Metalloproteinases; CTL—C-Type Lectin-Like Toxins; SVSP—Snake Venom Serine Proteinases; PLA2—Phospholipases A2; VEGF—Vascular Endothelial Growth Factors; LAO—L-Aminoacid Oxidases; HYAL—Hialuronidases; CRISP—Cysteine Rich Secretory Proteins; NGF—Nerve Growth Factors; NUC—5′Nucleotodases; PDE—Phosphodiesterases; PLB—Phospholipases B; BPP—Bradikinin Potenciating Peptides; DIPEP—Dipeptidyl Peptidases; CYS—Cystatin; iPLAs—Phospholipase inhibitors; LIPA—Lipases; WAP—Warprins; and KUN—Kunitz Trypsin Inhibitor.
Table 2. Description of the snake specimens used in this study.
Table 2. Description of the snake specimens used in this study.
CodeGenusSexAgeSVL (mm)CityLocality
SB0779Bothrocophias hyoproraFadult370Mâncio Lima—AcrePARNA Serra do Divisor, Formosa trail
SB0780Bothrocophias hyoprpraMjuvenile252Mâncio Lima—AcrePARNA Serra do Divisor, Formosa trail
SB0597Bothrops atroxMadult1020Sena Madureira—AcreRESEX Cazumbá-Iracema
SB0600Bothrops atroxFadult1090Sena Madureira—AcreRESEX Cazumbá-Iracema
SB0796Bothrops atroxMadult1035Mâncio Lima—AcrePARNA Serra do Divisor, Formosa trail
SB0582Bothrops b. smaragdinusMadult532Sena Madureira—AcreRESEX Cazumbá-Iracema
SB0782Bothrops b. smaragdinusFadult675Mâncio Lima—AcrePARNA Serra do Divisor, Formosa trail
SB1942Bothrops b. smaragdinusMadult534Mâncio Lima—AcrePARNA Serra do Divisor, Formosa trail
SB1455Bothrops braziliMadult795Mâncio Lima—AcreSerra do Divisor
SB1948Bothrops braziliFadult685Mâncio Lima—AcrePARNA Serra do Divisor, Formosa trail
SB1953Bothrops braziliFjuvenile341Guajará—AmazonasND
SB1580Bothrops taeniatusFadult517Mâncio Lima—AcrePARNA Serra do Divisor
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Freitas-de-Sousa, L.A.; Colombini, M.; Souza, V.C.; Silva, J.P.C.; Mota-da-Silva, A.; Almeida, M.R.N.; Machado, R.A.; Fonseca, W.L.; Sartim, M.A.; Sachett, J.; et al. Venom Composition of Neglected Bothropoid Snakes from the Amazon Rainforest: Ecological and Toxinological Implications. Toxins 2024, 16, 83. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxins16020083

AMA Style

Freitas-de-Sousa LA, Colombini M, Souza VC, Silva JPC, Mota-da-Silva A, Almeida MRN, Machado RA, Fonseca WL, Sartim MA, Sachett J, et al. Venom Composition of Neglected Bothropoid Snakes from the Amazon Rainforest: Ecological and Toxinological Implications. Toxins. 2024; 16(2):83. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxins16020083

Chicago/Turabian Style

Freitas-de-Sousa, Luciana A., Mônica Colombini, Vinicius C. Souza, Joanderson P. C. Silva, Ageane Mota-da-Silva, Marllus R. N. Almeida, Reginaldo A. Machado, Wirven L. Fonseca, Marco A. Sartim, Jacqueline Sachett, and et al. 2024. "Venom Composition of Neglected Bothropoid Snakes from the Amazon Rainforest: Ecological and Toxinological Implications" Toxins 16, no. 2: 83. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxins16020083

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop