Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (167)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = disdrometer

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
24 pages, 4274 KB  
Article
Observed Effects of Near-Surface Relative Humidity on Rainfall Microphysics During the LIAISE Field Campaign
by Francesc Polls, Joan Bech, Mireia Udina, Eric Peinó and Albert Garcia-Benadí
Remote Sens. 2026, 18(3), 509; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs18030509 - 5 Feb 2026
Viewed by 342
Abstract
This study, conducted in the framework of the LIAISE field campaign in NE Spain (May–September 2021), investigates how near-surface relative humidity influences early-stage rainfall characteristics when precipitation is most affected by temperature and relative humidity before rainfall onset. Two instrumented sites were examined, [...] Read more.
This study, conducted in the framework of the LIAISE field campaign in NE Spain (May–September 2021), investigates how near-surface relative humidity influences early-stage rainfall characteristics when precipitation is most affected by temperature and relative humidity before rainfall onset. Two instrumented sites were examined, using disdrometers, Micro Rain Radar (MRR), C-band weather radar data, and automatic weather stations. Rainfall events were first classified as stratiform or convective using weather radar data based on a texture analysis of the reflectivity field. Then, only stratiform events were selected and further classified into dry and moist categories according to the upper and lower terciles of near-surface (2 m) relative humidity at the rainfall onset (dry < 54%; moist > 72%). Results show that during dry events, the time delay between the detection of precipitation at ~750 m above ground level (AGL) (by MRR or C-band radar) and its arrival at the surface (measured by the disdrometer) is consistently longer than during moist events, indicating possible evaporation of raindrops during their descent. Surface drop size distributions also differ: dry cases have generally fewer small drops (with diameters < 0.8 mm) but relatively more large drops, leading to higher radar reflectivity values despite similar surface rainfall amounts. However, reflectivity observed aloft by C-band radar and MRR does not present the dependence on relative humidity found at ground level. Findings reported here increase our understanding of the impact of low-level conditions on precipitation characteristics and microphysical associated processes and may contribute to improve correction schemes in operational weather radar quantitative precipitation estimates. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

26 pages, 2030 KB  
Article
Precipitation Phase Classification with X-Band Polarimetric Radar and Machine Learning Using Micro Rain Radar and Disdrometer Data in Grenoble (French Alps)
by Francesc Polls, Brice Boudevillain, Mireia Udina, Francisco J. Ruiz, Albert Garcia-Benadí, Eulàlia Busquets, Matthieu Vernay and Joan Bech
Remote Sens. 2026, 18(3), 433; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs18030433 - 29 Jan 2026
Viewed by 391
Abstract
Accurate classification of precipitation phase (liquid, mixed, or solid) is essential in high mountain environments, where rapid changes in elevation can lead to abrupt phase transitions over short distances, significantly affecting hydro-meteorological, ecological, and socio-economic activities. However, most existing classification schemes have not [...] Read more.
Accurate classification of precipitation phase (liquid, mixed, or solid) is essential in high mountain environments, where rapid changes in elevation can lead to abrupt phase transitions over short distances, significantly affecting hydro-meteorological, ecological, and socio-economic activities. However, most existing classification schemes have not been evaluated over long periods using real observational data, but mainly through simulations. This study addresses this gap by introducing a new methodology based on X-band polarimetric radar and by validating it against real precipitation events over an extended time period. The machine learning model is trained and tested using a four-year dataset including X-band radar, Micro Rain Radar, disdrometer, and temperature profile data from the Grenoble region (French Alps). To improve the classification accuracy, three temperature profile sources were tested: lapse rates obtained from automatic weather stations, interpolation of the temperature profile from the freezing level detected by the Micro Rain Radar, and temperature profiles from the operational AROME model forecast. Three different phase classification schemes were tested: two existing schemes based on fuzzy-logic, and the new method based on random forest. Results show that the random forest method, trained with radar polarimetric variables, AROME temperature profiles, and target labels derived from Micro Rain Radar observations, achieves the highest accuracy. Despite the overall good classification results, limitations persist in identifying mixed-phase precipitation due to its transitional nature and vertical variability. Feature importance analysis indicates that temperature is the most influential variable in the classification scheme, followed by reflectivity factor measured in the horizontal plane (Ze) and differential reflectivity (Zdr). This methodology demonstrates the potential of combining machine learning techniques with multi-instrument observations to improve hydrometeor classification in complex terrain. The approach offers valuable insights for operational forecasting, water resource management, and climate impact assessments in mountainous regions. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

20 pages, 5273 KB  
Article
Investigation of the Vertical Microphysical Characteristics of Rainfall in Guangzhou Based on Phased-Array Radar
by Jingxuan Zhu, Jun Zhang, Duanyang Ji, Qiang Dai and Changjun Liu
Remote Sens. 2026, 18(2), 322; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs18020322 - 18 Jan 2026
Viewed by 363
Abstract
The accurate retrieval of the raindrop size distribution (DSD) is a longstanding objective in meteorology because it underpins reliable quantitative precipitation estimation. Among remote sensors, weather radars are the primary tool for mapping DSD over wide areas, and phased-array systems in particular have [...] Read more.
The accurate retrieval of the raindrop size distribution (DSD) is a longstanding objective in meteorology because it underpins reliable quantitative precipitation estimation. Among remote sensors, weather radars are the primary tool for mapping DSD over wide areas, and phased-array systems in particular have demonstrated unique advantages owing to their high temporal and spatial resolution together with agile beam steering. Exploiting the underused high-resolution capability of an X-band phased-array radar, this study induced a Rainfall Regression Model (RRM). The RRM assumes a normalized gamma DSD model and retrieves its three parameters. It was then applied to a rain event influenced by the remnant circulation of Typhoon Haikui that affected Guangzhou on 8 September 2023. First, collocated disdrometer observations and T-matrix scattering simulations are used to build polynomial regressions between DSD parameters (D0, Nw, μ) and the polarimetric variables. Validation against independent disdrometer samples yields Nash–Sutcliffe efficiencies of 0.93 for D0 and 0.91 for log10Nw. The RRM is then applied to the full volumetric radar data. Horizontal maps reveal that the surface elevation angle consistently exhibited the largest standard deviation for all three parameters. A vertical profile analysis shows that large-drop cores (D0 > 2 mm) can reside above 2 km and that iso-value contours tilt rather than align vertically, implying an appreciable horizontal drift of raindrops within the complex remnant typhoon–monsoon wind field. By demonstrating the ability of X-band phased-array radar to resolve the three-dimensional microphysical structure of remnant typhoon precipitation, this study advances our understanding of the vertical characteristics of raindrops and provides high-resolution DSD information that can be directly ingested into severe weather monitoring and nowcasting systems. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Environmental Remote Sensing)
Show Figures

Figure 1

22 pages, 3578 KB  
Article
Integrated Approach to Assess Simulated Rainfall Uniformity and Energy-Related Parameters for Erosion Studies
by Roberto Caruso, Maria Angela Serio, Gabriel Búrdalo-Salcedo, Francesco Giuseppe Carollo, Almudena Ortiz-Marqués, Vito Ferro and María Fernández-Raga
Water 2025, 17(23), 3429; https://doi.org/10.3390/w17233429 - 2 Dec 2025
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 960
Abstract
Rainfall simulators are crucial devices in erosion research, enabling the controlled reproduction of precipitation characteristics for both laboratory and field investigations. This study presents a comprehensive characterization of a rainfall simulator originally designed to assess the erosive effects of precipitation on heritage surfaces. [...] Read more.
Rainfall simulators are crucial devices in erosion research, enabling the controlled reproduction of precipitation characteristics for both laboratory and field investigations. This study presents a comprehensive characterization of a rainfall simulator originally designed to assess the erosive effects of precipitation on heritage surfaces. The simulator, installed at the University of León, was evaluated using volumetric methods and disdrometric techniques, employing a Parsivel2 optical disdrometer. Simulations were conducted with a falling height of 10 m and high-intensity rainfalls. Spatial uniformity was assessed through thematic mapping and the Christiansen Uniformity (CU) coefficient, revealing limited uniformity across the full wetted area, but an improved performance within the central zone (CU up to 80%). Disdrometric data provided detailed insights into drop size and velocity distributions, enabling the estimation of rainfall intensity, kinetic energy, and momentum, as well as the spatial uniformity of the energetic parameters. Empirical models to estimate the raindrop’s fall velocity were tested against disdrometric measurements, confirming the simulator’s ability to generate rainfall with velocity characteristics comparable to those of natural precipitation. Moreover, the findings underscore the importance of integrating multiple measurement approaches to enhance the reliability and accuracy of rainfall simulator characterization. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

20 pages, 7975 KB  
Article
Impact of Wind on Rainfall Measurements Obtained from the OTT Parsivel2 Disdrometer
by Enrico Chinchella, Arianna Cauteruccio and Luca G. Lanza
Sensors 2025, 25(20), 6440; https://doi.org/10.3390/s25206440 - 18 Oct 2025
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 701
Abstract
The impact of wind on precipitation measurements from the OTT Parsivel2 optical transmission disdrometer is quantified using computational fluid dynamics simulations. The numerical velocity field around the instrument body and above the instrument sensing area (the laser beam) shows significant disturbance that [...] Read more.
The impact of wind on precipitation measurements from the OTT Parsivel2 optical transmission disdrometer is quantified using computational fluid dynamics simulations. The numerical velocity field around the instrument body and above the instrument sensing area (the laser beam) shows significant disturbance that depends heavily on the wind direction. By computing the trajectories of raindrops approaching the instrument, the wind-induced bias is quantified for a wide range of environmental conditions. Adjustments are derived in terms of site-independent catch ratios, which can be used to correct measurements in post-processing. The impact on two integral rainfall variables, the rainfall intensity and radar reflectivity, is calculated in terms of collection and radar retrieval efficiency assuming a sample drop size distribution. For rainfall intensity measurements, the OTT Parsivel2 shows significant bias, even much higher than the wind-induced bias typical of catching-type rain gauges. Large underestimation is shown for wind parallel to the laser beam, while limited bias occurs for wind perpendicular to it. The intermediate case, with wind at 45°, presents non negligible overestimation. Proper alignment of the instrument with the laser beam perpendicular to the prevailing wind direction at the installation site and the use of windshields may significantly reduce the overall wind-induced bias. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Atmospheric Precipitation Sensors)
Show Figures

Figure 1

19 pages, 3601 KB  
Article
Study on Correction Methods for GPM Rainfall Rate and Radar Reflectivity Using Ground-Based Raindrop Spectrometer Data
by Lin Chen, Huige Di, Dongdong Chen, Ning Chen, Qinze Chen and Dengxin Hua
Remote Sens. 2025, 17(15), 2747; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs17152747 - 7 Aug 2025
Viewed by 1341
Abstract
The Dual-frequency Precipitation Radar (DPR) aboard the Global Precipitation Measurement (GPM) mission provides valuable three-dimensional precipitation structure data on a global scale and has been widely used in hydrometeorological research. However, due to its spatial resolution limitations and inherent algorithmic assumptions, the accuracy [...] Read more.
The Dual-frequency Precipitation Radar (DPR) aboard the Global Precipitation Measurement (GPM) mission provides valuable three-dimensional precipitation structure data on a global scale and has been widely used in hydrometeorological research. However, due to its spatial resolution limitations and inherent algorithmic assumptions, the accuracy of GPM precipitation estimates can exhibit systematic biases, especially under complex terrain conditions or in the presence of variable precipitation structures, such as light stratiform rain or intense convective storms. In this study, we evaluated the near-surface precipitation rate estimates from the GPM-DPR Level 2A product using over 1440 min of disdrometer observations collected across China from 2021 to 2023. Based on three years of stable stratiform precipitation data from the Jinghe station, we developed a least squares linear correction model for radar reflectivity. Independent validation using national disdrometer data from 2023 demonstrated that the corrected reflectivity significantly improved rainfall estimates under light precipitation conditions, although improvements were limited for convective events or in complex terrain. To further enhance retrieval accuracy, we introduced a regionally adaptive R–Z relationship scheme stratified by precipitation type and terrain category. Applying these localized relationships to the corrected reflectivity yielded more consistent rainfall estimates across diverse conditions, highlighting the importance of incorporating regional microphysical characteristics into satellite retrieval algorithms. The results indicate that the accuracy of GPM precipitation retrievals is more significantly influenced by precipitation type than by terrain complexity. Under stratiform precipitation conditions, the GPM-estimated precipitation data demonstrate the highest reliability. The correction framework proposed in this study is grounded on ground-based observations and integrates regional precipitation types with terrain characteristics. It effectively enhances the applicability of GPM-DPR products across diverse environmental conditions in China and offers a methodological reference for correcting satellite precipitation biases in other regions. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

18 pages, 3393 KB  
Article
An Investigation of the Characteristics of the Mei–Yu Raindrop Size Distribution and the Limitations of Numerical Microphysical Parameterization
by Zhaoping Kang, Zhimin Zhou, Yinglian Guo, Yuting Sun and Lin Liu
Remote Sens. 2025, 17(14), 2459; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs17142459 - 16 Jul 2025
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 948
Abstract
This study examines a Mei-Yu rainfall event using rain gauges (RG) and OTT Parsivel disdrometers to observe precipitation characteristics and raindrop size distributions (RSD), with comparisons made against Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) model simulations. Results show that Parsivel-derived rain rates (RR [...] Read more.
This study examines a Mei-Yu rainfall event using rain gauges (RG) and OTT Parsivel disdrometers to observe precipitation characteristics and raindrop size distributions (RSD), with comparisons made against Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) model simulations. Results show that Parsivel-derived rain rates (RR) are slightly underestimated relative to RG measurements. Both observations and simulations identify 1–3 mm raindrops as the dominant precipitation contributors, though the model overestimates small and large drop contributions. At low RR, decreased small-drop and increased large-drop concentrations cause corresponding leftward and rightward RSD shifts with decreasing altitude—a pattern well captured by simulations. However, at elevated rainfall rates, the simulated concentration of large raindrops shows no significant increase, resulting in negligible rightward shifting of RSD in the model outputs. Autoconversion from cloud droplets to raindrops (ATcr), collision and breakup between raindrops (AGrr), ice melting (MLir), and evaporation of raindrops (VDrv) contribute more to the number density of raindrops. At 0.1 < RR < 1 mm·h−1, ATcr dominates, while VDrv peaks in this intensity range before decreasing. At higher intensities (RR > 20 mm·h−1), AGrr contributes most, followed by MLir. When the RR is high enough, the breakup of raindrops plays a more important role than collision, leading to a decrease in the number density of raindrops. The overestimation of raindrop breakup from the numerical parameterization may be one of the reasons why the RSD does not shift significantly to the right toward the surface under the heavy RR grade. The RSD near the surface varies with the RR and characterizes surface precipitation well. Toward the surface, ATcr and VDrv, but not AGrr, become similar when precipitation approaches. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

15 pages, 3298 KB  
Article
Linkage Between Radar Reflectivity Slope and Raindrop Size Distribution in Precipitation with Bright Bands
by Qinghui Li, Xuejin Sun, Xichuan Liu and Haoran Li
Remote Sens. 2025, 17(14), 2393; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs17142393 - 11 Jul 2025
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 920
Abstract
This study investigates the linkage between the radar reflectivity slope and raindrop size distribution (DSD) in precipitation with bright bands through coordinated C-band/Ka-band radar and disdrometer observations in southern China. Precipitation is classified into three types based on the reflectivity slope (K-value) below [...] Read more.
This study investigates the linkage between the radar reflectivity slope and raindrop size distribution (DSD) in precipitation with bright bands through coordinated C-band/Ka-band radar and disdrometer observations in southern China. Precipitation is classified into three types based on the reflectivity slope (K-value) below the freezing level, revealing distinct microphysical regimes: Type 1 (K = 0 to −0.9) shows coalescence-dominated growth; Type 2 (|K| > 0.9) shows the balance between coalescence and evaporation/size sorting; and Type 3 (K = 0.9 to 0) demonstrates evaporation/size-sorting effects. Surface DSD analysis demonstrates distinct precipitation characteristics across classification types. Type 3 has the highest frequency of occurrence. A gradual decrease in the mean rain rates is observed from Type 1 to Type 3, with Type 3 exhibiting significantly lower rainfall intensities compared to Type 1. At equivalent rainfall rates, Type 2 exhibits unique microphysical signatures with larger mass-weighted mean diameters (Dm) compared to other types. These differences are due to Type 2 maintaining a high relative humidity above the freezing level (influencing initial Dm at bottom of melting layer) but experiencing limited Dm growth due to a dry warm rain layer and downdrafts. Type 1 shows opposite characteristics—a low initial Dm from the dry upper layers but maximum growth through the moist warm rain layer and updrafts. Type 3 features intermediate humidity throughout the column with updrafts and downdrafts coexisting in the warm rain layer, producing moderate growth. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Remote Sensing in Clouds and Precipitation Physics)
Show Figures

Figure 1

16 pages, 2149 KB  
Article
ZR Relationships for Different Precipitation Types and Events from Parsivel Disdrometer Data in Warsaw, Poland
by Mariusz Paweł Barszcz and Ewa Kaznowska
Remote Sens. 2025, 17(13), 2271; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs17132271 - 2 Jul 2025
Viewed by 837
Abstract
In this study, the relationship between radar reflectivity and rain rate (Z–R) was investigated. The analysis was conducted using data collected by the OTT Parsivel1 disdrometer during the periods 2012–2014 and 2019–2025 in Warsaw, Poland. As a first step, the [...] Read more.
In this study, the relationship between radar reflectivity and rain rate (Z–R) was investigated. The analysis was conducted using data collected by the OTT Parsivel1 disdrometer during the periods 2012–2014 and 2019–2025 in Warsaw, Poland. As a first step, the parameters a and b of the power-law Z–R relationship were estimated separately for three precipitation types: rain, sleet (rain with snow), and snow. Subsequently, observational data from all 12 months of the annual cycle were used to derive Z–R relationships for 118 individual precipitation events. To date, only a few studies of this kind have been conducted in Poland. In the analysis limited to rain events, the estimated parameters (a = 265, b = 1.48) showed relatively minor deviations from the classical Z–R function for convective rainfall, Z = 300R1.4. However, the parameter a deviated more noticeably from the Z = 200R1.6 relationship proposed by Marshall and Palmer, which is commonly used to convert radar reflectivity into rainfall estimates, including in the Polish POLRAD radar system. The dataset used in this study included rainfall events of varying types, both stratiform and convective, which contributed to the averaging of Z–R parameters. The values for the parameter a in the Z–R relationship estimated for the other two categories of precipitation types, sleet and snow, were significantly higher than those determined for rain events alone. The a values calculated for individual events demonstrated considerable variability, ranging from 80 to 751, while the b values presented a more predictable range, from 1.10 to 1.77. The highest parameter a values were observed during the summer months: June, July, and August. The variability in the Z–R relationship for individual events assessed in this study indicates the need for further research under diverse meteorological conditions, particularly for stratiform and convective precipitation. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

24 pages, 44212 KB  
Article
Calibration of Two X-Band Ground Radars Against GPM DPR Ku-Band
by Eleni Loulli, Silas Michaelides, Johannes Bühl, Athanasios Loukas and Diofantos Hadjimitsis
Remote Sens. 2025, 17(10), 1712; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs17101712 - 14 May 2025
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1541
Abstract
Weather radars are essential in the Quantitative Precipitation Estimates (QPE) but are susceptible to calibration errors. Previous work demonstrated that observations from the Ku-band Dual Polarization Radar (DPR) radar on board the Global Precipitation Measurement Mission Dual-Precipitation Radar (GPM) are suitable for ground [...] Read more.
Weather radars are essential in the Quantitative Precipitation Estimates (QPE) but are susceptible to calibration errors. Previous work demonstrated that observations from the Ku-band Dual Polarization Radar (DPR) radar on board the Global Precipitation Measurement Mission Dual-Precipitation Radar (GPM) are suitable for ground radar calibration. Several studies volume-matched ground radar and GPM DPR Ku-band reflectivities for the absolute calibration of ground radars, by applying different constraints and filters in the volume-matching procedure. This study compares and evaluates volume-matching thresholds and data filtering schemes for the Rizoelia, Larnaca (LCA) and Nata, Pafos (PFO) radars of the Cyprus weather radar network from October 2017 till May 2023. Excluding reflectivities below and within the melting layer with a 250 m buffer yielded consistent results for both ground radars. The selected calibration schemes were combined, and the resulting offsets were compared to stable radar parameters to identify stable calibration periods. The consistency of the wet hydrological year October 2019 to September 2020 suggests that radar calibration results are prone to differences in meteorological conditions, as scarce rainfall can result in insufficient data for reliable calibration. Future work will incorporate disdrometer measurements and extend the analysis to quantitative precipitation estimation. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Remote Sensing of Precipitation Extremes)
Show Figures

Figure 1

23 pages, 6133 KB  
Article
Spatial Heterogeneity of Drop Size Distribution and Its Implications for the Z-R Relationship in Mexico City
by Roberta Karinne Mocva-Kurek, Adrián Pedrozo-Acuña and Miguel Angel Rico-Ramírez
Atmosphere 2025, 16(5), 585; https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos16050585 - 13 May 2025
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 1110
Abstract
The evaluation of raindrop size distribution (DSD) is a crucial subject in radar meteorology, as it determines the relationship between radar reflectivity (Z) and rainfall rate (R). The coefficients (a and b) of the Z-R relationship vary significantly due to several factors (e.g., [...] Read more.
The evaluation of raindrop size distribution (DSD) is a crucial subject in radar meteorology, as it determines the relationship between radar reflectivity (Z) and rainfall rate (R). The coefficients (a and b) of the Z-R relationship vary significantly due to several factors (e.g., climate and rainfall intensity), rendering the characterization of local DSD essential for improving radar quantitative precipitation estimation. This study used a unique network of 21 disdrometers with high spatio-temporal resolution in Mexico City to investigate changes in the local drop size distribution (DSD) resulting from seasonal fluctuations, rain rates, and topographical regions (flat urban and mountainous). The results indicate that the DSD modeling utilizing the normalized gamma distribution provides an adequate fit in Mexico City, regardless of geographical location and season. Regional variation in DSD’s slope, shape, and parameters was detected in flat urban and mountainous areas, indicating that distinct precipitation mechanisms govern rainfall in each season. Severe rain intensities (R > 20 mm/h) exhibited a more uniform and flatter DSD shape, accompanied by increased dispersion of DSD parameter values among disdrometer locations, particularly for intensities exceeding R > 60 mm/h. The coefficients a and b of the Z-R relationship exhibit significant geographic variability, dependent on the city’s topographic gradient, underscoring the necessity for regionalization of both coefficients within the metropolis. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Meteorology)
Show Figures

Figure 1

19 pages, 10062 KB  
Article
Validation of Gamma Raindrop Size Distribution Estimates Using Approximate Expressions with a Vertically Pointing Very-High-Frequency Radar
by Meng-Yuan Chen, Ching-Lun Su, Wei-Sung Jen, Yen-Hsyang Chu and Wei-Nai Chen
Remote Sens. 2025, 17(6), 983; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs17060983 - 11 Mar 2025
Cited by 3 | Viewed by 1578
Abstract
Characterizing the size distribution of raindrops is fundamental to a variety of applications, including radar-based quantitative precipitation estimation. Atmospheric radars or wind profilers can be used to measure the drop size distribution (DSD) by analyzing the Doppler spectrum, which is inherently linked to [...] Read more.
Characterizing the size distribution of raindrops is fundamental to a variety of applications, including radar-based quantitative precipitation estimation. Atmospheric radars or wind profilers can be used to measure the drop size distribution (DSD) by analyzing the Doppler spectrum, which is inherently linked to raindrop velocity. This is achieved by mapping the Doppler spectrum from velocity space into diameter space directly. Since the general Gamma distribution is extensively used to model the DSD characteristic by numerous researchers in the meteorological community, it can be retrieved from the Doppler spectrum by applying appropriate relationships between drop diameter and terminal velocity. In this study, a retrieval method based on an approximate analytical solution was validated with both simulated data and very-high-frequency (VHF) radar observations, where the DSD followed the Gamma distribution. The advantage of using analytical solutions is their computational efficiency for the real-time processing of large data sets. In order to verify the applicability of this method, the mass-weighted mean drop diameter Dm, which is associated with the parameters of the Gamma DSD, was used to present the results. Simulations showed that the retrieval method is effective for 0.7 mm <Dm< 4 mm, with errors decreasing as the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) increases. Furthermore, comparisons between radar data and simultaneous disdrometer observations revealed that the precipitation parameters retrieved from the VHF radar at 1.65 km maintain moderate correlations with the ground-based in situ instrument measurements. Whether for stratiform or convective precipitation, this retrieval method produced reasonable estimates of aloft precipitation parameters. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Atmospheric Remote Sensing)
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

27 pages, 13326 KB  
Article
Observations of the Microphysics and Type of Wintertime Mixed-Phase Precipitation, and Instrument Comparisons at Sorel, Quebec, Canada
by Faisal S. Boudala, Mathieu Lachapelle, George A. Isaac, Jason A. Milbrandt, Daniel Michelson, Robert Reed and Stephen Holden
Remote Sens. 2025, 17(6), 945; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs17060945 - 7 Mar 2025
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1402
Abstract
Winter mixed-phase precipitation (P) impacts transportation, electric power grids, and homes. Forecasting winter precipitation such as freezing precipitation (ZP), freezing rain (ZR), freezing drizzle (ZL), ice pellets (IPs), and the snow (S) and rain (R) boundary remains challenging due to the complex cloud [...] Read more.
Winter mixed-phase precipitation (P) impacts transportation, electric power grids, and homes. Forecasting winter precipitation such as freezing precipitation (ZP), freezing rain (ZR), freezing drizzle (ZL), ice pellets (IPs), and the snow (S) and rain (R) boundary remains challenging due to the complex cloud microphysical and dynamical processes involved, which are difficult to predict with the current numerical weather prediction (NWP) models. Understanding these processes based on observations is crucial for improving NWP models. To aid this effort, Environment and Climate Change Canada deployed specialized instruments such as the Vaisala FD71P and OTT PARSIVEL disdrometers, which measure P type (PT), particle size distributions, and fall velocity (V). The liquid water content (LWC) and mean mass-weighted diameter (Dm) were derived based on the PARSIVEL data during ZP events. Additionally, a Micro Rain Radar (MRR) and an OTT Pluvio2 P gauge were used as part of the Winter Precipitation Type Research Multi-Scale Experiment (WINTRE-MIX) field campaign at Sorel, Quebec. The dataset included manual measurements of the snow water equivalent (SWE), PT, and radiosonde profiles. The analysis revealed that the FD71P and PARSIVEL instruments generally agreed in detecting P and snow events. However, FD71P tended to overestimate ZR and underestimate IPs, while PARSIVEL showed superior detection of R, ZR, and S. Conversely, the FD71P performed better in identifying ZL. These discrepancies may stem from uncertainties in the velocity–diameter (V-D) relationship used to diagnose ZR and IPs. Observations from the MRR, radiosondes, and surface data linked ZR and IP events to melting layers (MLs). IP events were associated with colder surface temperatures (Ts) compared to ZP events. Most ZR and ZL occurrences were characterized by light P with low LWC and specific intensity and Dm thresholds. Additionally, snow events were more common at warmer T compared to liquid P under low surface relative humidity conditions. The Pluvio2 gauge significantly underestimated snowfall compared to the optical probes and manual measurements. However, snowfall estimates derived from PARSIVEL data, adjusted for snow density to account for riming effects, closely matched measurements from the FD71P and manual observations. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

21 pages, 4500 KB  
Article
Validation of DSDs of GPM DPR with Ground-Based Disdrometers over the Tianshan Region, China
by Xinyu Lu, Xiuqin Wang, Cheng Li, Yan Liu, Yong Zeng and Hong Huo
Remote Sens. 2025, 17(1), 79; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs17010079 - 28 Dec 2024
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 1564
Abstract
The Tianshan Mountains are known as the “Water Tower of Central Asia” and are of significant strategic importance for Xinjiang as well as the Central Asian region. Accurately monitoring the spatiotemporal distribution of precipitation in the Tianshan Mountains is crucial for understanding global [...] Read more.
The Tianshan Mountains are known as the “Water Tower of Central Asia” and are of significant strategic importance for Xinjiang as well as the Central Asian region. Accurately monitoring the spatiotemporal distribution of precipitation in the Tianshan Mountains is crucial for understanding global water cycles and climate change. Raindrop Size Distribution (DSD) parameters play an important role in improving quantitative precipitation estimation with radar and understanding microphysical precipitation processes. In this study, DSD parameters in the Tianshan Mountains were evaluated on the basis of Global Precipitation Measurement mission (GPM) dual-frequency radar data (DPR) and ground-based laser disdrometer observations from 2019 to 2024. With the disdrometer observations as the true values, we performed spatiotemporal matching between the satellite radar and laser disdrometer data. The droplet spectrum parameters retrieved with the GPM dual-frequency radar system were compared with those calculated from the laser disdrometer observations. The reflectivity observations from the GPM DPR in both the Ku and Ka bands (ZKu and ZKa) were greater than the actual observations, with ZKa displaying a greater degree of overestimation than ZKu. In the applied single-frequency retrieval algorithm (SFA), the rainfall parameters retrieved from the Ka band outperformed those retrieved from the Ku band, indicating that the Ka band has stronger detection capability in the Tianshan Mountains area, where light rain predominates. The dual-frequency ratio (DFR), i.e., the differences in the reflectivity of the raindrop spectra obtained from both the Ku and Ka bands, fluctuated more greatly than those of the GPM DPR. DFR is a monotonically increasing function of the mass-weighted mean drop diameter (Dm). Rainfall rate (R) and Dm exhibited a strong positive correlation, and the fitted curve followed a power function distribution. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Atmospheric Remote Sensing)
Show Figures

Figure 1

21 pages, 1556 KB  
Article
Deep Learning for Opportunistic Rain Estimation via Satellite Microwave Links
by Giovanni Scognamiglio, Andrea Rucci, Attilio Vaccaro, Elisa Adirosi, Fabiola Sapienza, Filippo Giannetti, Giacomo Bacci, Sabina Angeloni, Luca Baldini, Giacomo Roversi, Alberto Ortolani, Andrea Antonini and Samantha Melani
Sensors 2024, 24(21), 6944; https://doi.org/10.3390/s24216944 - 29 Oct 2024
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 2472
Abstract
Accurate precipitation measurement is critical for managing flood and drought risks. Traditional meteorological tools, such as rain gauges and remote sensors, have limitations in resolution, coverage, and cost-effectiveness. Recently, the opportunistic use of microwave communication signals has been explored to improve precipitation estimation. [...] Read more.
Accurate precipitation measurement is critical for managing flood and drought risks. Traditional meteorological tools, such as rain gauges and remote sensors, have limitations in resolution, coverage, and cost-effectiveness. Recently, the opportunistic use of microwave communication signals has been explored to improve precipitation estimation. While there is growing interest in using satellite-to-earth microwave links (SMLs) for machine learning-based precipitation estimation, direct rainfall estimation from raw signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) data via deep learning remains underexplored. This study investigates a range of machine learning (ML) approaches, including deep learning (DL) models and traditional methods like gradient boosting machine (GBM), for estimating rainfall rates from SNR data collected by interactive satellite receivers. We develop real-time models for rainfall detection and estimation using downlink SNR signals from satellites to user terminals. By leveraging a year-long dataset from multiple locations—including SNR measurements paired with disdrometer and rain-gauge data—we explore and evaluate various ML models. Our final models include ensemble approaches for both rainfall detection and cumulative rainfall estimation. The proposed models provide a reliable solution for estimating precipitation using Earth–satellite microwave links, potentially improving precipitation monitoring. Compared to the state-of-the-art power-law-based models applied to similar datasets reported in the literature, our ML models achieve a 46% reduction in the root mean squared error (RMSE) for event-based cumulative precipitation predictions. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Remote Sensing in Atmospheric Measurements)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop