Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Article Types

Countries / Regions

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Search Results (876)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = crop straws

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
22 pages, 2187 KiB  
Article
Long-Term Rotary Tillage and Straw Mulching Enhance Dry Matter Production, Yield, and Water Use Efficiency of Wheat in a Rain-Fed Wheat-Soybean Double Cropping System
by Shiyan Dong, Ming Huang, Junhao Zhang, Qihui Zhou, Chuan Hu, Aohan Liu, Hezheng Wang, Guozhan Fu, Jinzhi Wu and Youjun Li
Plants 2025, 14(15), 2438; https://doi.org/10.3390/plants14152438 - 6 Aug 2025
Abstract
Water deficiency and low water use efficiency severely constrain wheat yield in dryland regions. This study aimed to identify suitable tillage methods and straw management to improve dry matter production, grain yield, and water use efficiency of wheat in the dryland winter wheat–summer [...] Read more.
Water deficiency and low water use efficiency severely constrain wheat yield in dryland regions. This study aimed to identify suitable tillage methods and straw management to improve dry matter production, grain yield, and water use efficiency of wheat in the dryland winter wheat–summer bean (hereafter referred to as wheat-soybean) double-cropping system. A long-term located field experiment (onset in October 2009) with two tillage methods—plowing (PT) and rotary tillage (RT)—and two straw management—no straw mulching (NS) and straw mulching (SM)—was conducted at a typical dryland in China. The wheat yield and yield component, dry matter accumulation and translocation characteristics, and water use efficiency were investigated from 2014 to 2018. Straw management significantly affected wheat yield and yield components, while tillage methods had no significant effect. Furthermore, the interaction of tillage methods and straw management significantly affected yield and yield components except for the spike number. RTSM significantly increased the spike number, grains per spike, 1000-grain weight, harvest index, and grain yield by 12.5%, 8.4%, 6.0%, 3.4%, and 13.4%, respectively, compared to PTNS. Likewise, RTSM significantly increased the aforementioned indicators by 14.8%, 10.1%, 7.5%, 3.6%, and 20.5%, compared to RTNS. Mechanistic analysis revealed that, compared to NS, SM not only significantly enhanced pre-anthesis and post-anthesis dry matter accumulation, and pre-anthesis dry matter tanslocation to grain, but also significantly improved pre-sowing water storage, water consumption during wheat growth, water use efficiency, and water-saving for produced per kg grain yield, with the greatest improvements obtained under RT than PT. Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) analysis confirmed RTSM’s yield superiority was mainly ascribed to straw-induced improvements in dry matter and water productivity. In a word, rotary tillage with straw mulching could be recommended as a suitable practice for high-yield wheat production in a dryland wheat-soybean double-cropping system. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Emerging Trends in Alternative and Sustainable Crop Production)
Show Figures

Figure 1

31 pages, 13266 KiB  
Article
Emission of Total Volatile Organic Compounds from the Torrefaction Process: Meadow Hay, Rye, and Oat Straw as Renewable Fuels
by Justyna Czerwinska, Szymon Szufa, Hilal Unyay and Grzegorz Wielgosinski
Energies 2025, 18(15), 4154; https://doi.org/10.3390/en18154154 - 5 Aug 2025
Abstract
This study aims to quantify total VOC emissions and evaluate how torrefaction alters the heat of combustion of three agricultural residues. The work examines the amount of VOC emissions during the torrefaction process at various temperatures and investigates the changes in the heat [...] Read more.
This study aims to quantify total VOC emissions and evaluate how torrefaction alters the heat of combustion of three agricultural residues. The work examines the amount of VOC emissions during the torrefaction process at various temperatures and investigates the changes in the heat of combustion of agri-biomass resulting from the torrefaction process. The process was carried out at the following temperatures: 225, 250, 275, and 300 °C. Total VOC emission factors were determined. The reaction kinetics analysis revealed that meadow hay exhibited the most stable thermal behavior with the lowest activation energy. At the same time, rye straw demonstrated higher thermal resistance and complex multi-step degradation characteristics. The authors analyze three types of agricultural biomass: meadow hay, rye straw, and oat straw. The research was divided into five stages: determination of moisture content in the sample, determination of ash content, thermogravimetric analysis, measurement of total VOC emissions from the biomass torrefaction process, and determination of the heat of combustion of the obtained torrefied biomass. Based on the research, it was found that torrefaction of biomass causes the emission of torgas containing VOC in the amount of 2–10 mg/g of torrefied biomass, which can be used energetically, e.g., to support the torrefaction process, and the torrefied biomass shows a higher value of the heat of combustion. Unlike prior studies focused on single feedstocks or limited temperature ranges, this work systematically compares three major crop residues across four torrefaction temperatures and directly couples VOC quantifications. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

15 pages, 8138 KiB  
Article
Study on the Characteristics of Straw Fiber Curtains for Protecting Embankment Slopes from Rainfall Erosion
by Xiangyong Zhong, Feng Xu, Rusong Nie, Yang Li, Chunyan Zhao and Long Zhang
Eng 2025, 6(8), 179; https://doi.org/10.3390/eng6080179 - 1 Aug 2025
Viewed by 125
Abstract
Straw fiber curtain contains a plant fiber blanket woven from crop straw, which is mainly used to protect embankment slopes from rainwater erosion. To investigate the erosion control performance of slopes covered with straw fiber curtains of different structural configurations, physical model tests [...] Read more.
Straw fiber curtain contains a plant fiber blanket woven from crop straw, which is mainly used to protect embankment slopes from rainwater erosion. To investigate the erosion control performance of slopes covered with straw fiber curtains of different structural configurations, physical model tests were conducted in a 95 cm × 65 cm × 50 cm (length × height × width) test box with a slope ratio of 1:1.5 under controlled artificial rainfall conditions (20 mm/h, 40 mm/h, and 60 mm/h). The study evaluated the runoff characteristics, sediment yield, and key hydrodynamic parameters of slopes under the coverage of different straw fiber curtain types. The results show that the A-type straw fiber curtain (woven with strips of straw fiber) has the best effect on water retention and sediment reduction, while the B-type straw fiber curtain (woven with thicker straw strips) with vertical straw fiber has a better effect regarding water retention and sediment reduction than the B-type transverse straw fiber curtain. The flow of rainwater on a slope covered with straw fiber curtain is mainly a laminar flow. Straw fiber curtain can promote the conversion of water flow from rapids to slow flow. The Darcy-Weisbach resistance coefficient of straw fiber curtain increases at different degrees with an increase in rainfall time. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

17 pages, 3112 KiB  
Article
Impacts of Conservation Tillage on Soil Organic Carbon Mineralization in Eastern Inner Mongolia
by Boyu Liu, Jianquan Wang, Dian Jin and Hailin Zhang
Agronomy 2025, 15(8), 1847; https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy15081847 - 30 Jul 2025
Viewed by 210
Abstract
Soil organic carbon (SOC) mineralization plays the critical role of regulating carbon sequestration potential. This process is strongly influenced by agricultural practices, particularly tillage regimes and straw management. However, the complex interactions between tillage methods, straw types, and application rates in terms of [...] Read more.
Soil organic carbon (SOC) mineralization plays the critical role of regulating carbon sequestration potential. This process is strongly influenced by agricultural practices, particularly tillage regimes and straw management. However, the complex interactions between tillage methods, straw types, and application rates in terms of SOC dynamics, especially in semi-arid agroecosystems like eastern Inner Mongolia, remain poorly understood. In this study, we assessed the combined effects of no tillage (NT) vs. rotary tillage (RT), three straw types (maize/MS, wheat/WS, and oilseed rape/OS), and three application rates (0.4%/low, 0.8%/medium, and 1.2%/high) on SOC concentration and mineralization using controlled laboratory incubation with soils from long-term plots. The key findings revealed that NT significantly increased the SOC concentration in the topsoil (0–20 cm) by an average of 14.5% compared to that in the RT. Notably, combining NT with medium-rate wheat straw (0.8%) resulted in the achievement of the highest SOC accumulation (28.70 g/kg). SOC mineralization increased with straw inputs, exhibiting significant straw type × rate interactions. Oilseed rape straw showed the highest specific mineralization rate (33.9%) at low input, while maize straw mineralized fastest under high input with RT. Therefore, our results demonstrate that combining NT with either 0.8% wheat straw or 1.2% maize straw represents an optimal application strategy, as the SOC concentration is enhanced by 12–18% for effective carbon sequestration in this water-limited semi-arid region. Therefore, optimizing SOC sequestration requires the integration of appropriate crop residue application rates and tillage methods tailored to different cropping systems. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

22 pages, 2108 KiB  
Article
Effects of Conservation Tillage and Nitrogen Inhibitors on Yield and N2O Emissions for Spring Maize in Northeast China
by Fanchao Meng, Guozhong Feng, Lingchun Zhang, Yin Wang, Qiang Gao, Kelin Hu and Shaojie Wang
Agronomy 2025, 15(8), 1818; https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy15081818 - 27 Jul 2025
Viewed by 382
Abstract
Conservation tillage can improve soil health and carbon sequestration and is helpful for sustainable agricultural development. However, its effect on crop yields and nitrous oxide (N2O) emissions is still controversial. In this study, a two-year field experiment of spring maize was [...] Read more.
Conservation tillage can improve soil health and carbon sequestration and is helpful for sustainable agricultural development. However, its effect on crop yields and nitrous oxide (N2O) emissions is still controversial. In this study, a two-year field experiment of spring maize was conducted from 2019 to 2020 in the Phaeozems region of Northeast China, involving two tillage practices (strip tillage and conventional tillage) and two nitrogen inhibitors (N-butylthiophosphorotriamine, NBPT and 3,4-Dimethylpyrazole phosphate, DMPP). The WHCNS (Soil Water Heat Carbon Nitrogen Simulator) model was calibrated and validated with field observations, and the effects of different tillage practices and nitrification inhibitors on spring maize yield, N2O emissions, water use efficiency (WUE), and nitrogen use efficiency (NUE) were simulated using the WHCNS model. Precipitation scenarios were set up to simulate and analyze the changes in patterns of crop yield and N2O emissions under long-term conservation tillage for 30 years (1991–2020). The results showed that concerning maize yield, under conservation tillage, the type of straw and nitrogen fertilizer inhibitor could explain 72.1% and 7.1%, respectively, of the total variance in maize yield, while precipitation explained only 14.1% of the total variance, with a 28.5% increase in crop yield in a humid year compared to a dry year. N2O emissions were principally influenced by precipitation, which could explain 46.4% of the total variance in N2O emissions. Furthermore, N2O emissions were 385% higher in humid years than in dry years. Straw under conservation tillage and inhibitor type explained 8.1% and 19.4% of the total variance in N2O emissions, respectively. Conservation tillage with nitrification inhibitors is recommended to increase crop yields, improve soil quality and reduce greenhouse gas emissions in the Phaeozems region of Northeast China, thus ensuring sustainable agricultural development in the region. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

18 pages, 4915 KiB  
Article
The Quality of Seedbed and Seeding Under Four Tillage Modes
by Lijun Wang, Yunpeng Gao, Zhao Ma and Bo Wang
Agriculture 2025, 15(15), 1626; https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture15151626 - 26 Jul 2025
Viewed by 247
Abstract
Crop residue management and soil tillage (CRM and ST) are key steps in agricultural production. The effects of different CRM and ST modes on the quality of seedbed, seeding, and harvest yield are not well determined. In this study, the system of maize [...] Read more.
Crop residue management and soil tillage (CRM and ST) are key steps in agricultural production. The effects of different CRM and ST modes on the quality of seedbed, seeding, and harvest yield are not well determined. In this study, the system of maize (Zea mays L.)–soybean (Glycine max (L.) Merr) rotation under ridge-tillage in the semi-arid regions of Northeast China was chosen as the study conditions. Four modes were investigated: deep tillage and seeding (DT and S), stubble field and no-tillage seeding (SF and NTS), three-axis rotary tillage and seeding (TART and S), and shallow rotary tillage and seeding (SRT and S). Results show that the DT and S mode produced the best quality of seedbed and seeding. Among the conservation tillage modes, the SRT and S mode produced the shortest average length of roots and straw, the best uniformity of their distribution in the seedbed, and the highest soybean yield. Both the SRT and S and SF and NTS modes yielded a higher net profit as their cost-effectiveness. When considering only the quality of seedbed and seeding under conservation tillage as a prerequisite, it can be concluded that the SRT and S mode is both advantageous and sustainable. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Effects of Crop Management on Yields)
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

19 pages, 2764 KiB  
Article
Reducing Nitrogen Fertilization Rate in Spring Wheat–Pea Rotation Sustains Spring Wheat Yield and Quality
by Upendra M. Sainju and Gautam P. Pradhan
Agronomy 2025, 15(8), 1806; https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy15081806 - 26 Jul 2025
Viewed by 357
Abstract
The reduced N fertilization rate and N supplied by pea (Pisum sativum L.) residue may sustain subsequent spring wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) growth, yield, and quality. We examined the response of spring wheat growth, yield, and quality to cropping systems and [...] Read more.
The reduced N fertilization rate and N supplied by pea (Pisum sativum L.) residue may sustain subsequent spring wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) growth, yield, and quality. We examined the response of spring wheat growth, yield, and quality to cropping systems and N fertilization rates from 2012 to 2019 in the US northern Great Plains. Cropping systems were conventional till spring wheat–fallow (CTWF), no-till spring wheat–fallow (NTWF), no-till spring wheat–pea (NTWP), and no-till continuous wheat (NTCW), and N fertilization rates to spring wheat were 0, 50, 100, and 150 kg N ha−1. Wheat plant density and straw yield were 13–100% greater for CTWF and NTWF than NTWP and NTCW in most years. Wheat grain yield and protein concentration were also 15–115% greater for CTWF and NTWF than other cropping systems at most N fertilization rates and years. In contrast, wheat grain test weight was 1–2% lower for CTWF and NTWF at most N fertilization rates and years. Increasing N fertilization rate mostly increased grain yield and protein concentration but reduced grain test weight for most cropping systems and years. Although CTWF and NTWF with or without N fertilization increased wheat yield and quality, these practices are not sustainable due to reduced annualized yield, soil health, and environmental quality. Because of similar or greater grain yields and test weights among NTWP with 50 kg N ha−1 and NTWP and NTCW with other N rates, NTWP with reduced N rates may sustain spring wheat yield and grain size but not grain protein in the northern Great Plains. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

35 pages, 1745 KiB  
Article
Balanced Fertilization of Winter Wheat with Potassium and Magnesium—An Effective Way to Manage Fertilizer Nitrogen Sustainably
by Agnieszka Andrzejewska, Katarzyna Przygocka-Cyna and Witold Grzebisz
Sustainability 2025, 17(15), 6705; https://doi.org/10.3390/su17156705 - 23 Jul 2025
Viewed by 419
Abstract
In agricultural practice, in addition to determining the nitrogen (Nf) dose, it is necessary to effectively control its effect on currently grown crops. Meeting these conditions requires not only the use of phosphorus (P) and potassium (K), but also nutrients such [...] Read more.
In agricultural practice, in addition to determining the nitrogen (Nf) dose, it is necessary to effectively control its effect on currently grown crops. Meeting these conditions requires not only the use of phosphorus (P) and potassium (K), but also nutrients such as magnesium (Mg) and sulfur (S). This hypothesis was verified in a single-factor field experiment with winter wheat (WW) carried out in the 2015/2016, 2016/2017, and 2017/2018 growing seasons. The experiment consisted of seven variants: absolute control (AC), NP, NPK-MOP (K as Muriate of Potash), NPK-MOP+Ki (Kieserite), NPK-KK (K as Korn–Kali), NPK-KK+Ki, and NPK-KK+Ki+ES (Epsom Salt). The use of K as MOP increased grain yield (GY) by 6.3% compared to NP. In the NPK-KK variant, GY was 13% (+0.84 t ha−1) higher compared to NP. Moreover, GYs in this fertilization variant (FV) were stable over the years (coefficient of variation, CV = 9.4%). In NPK-KK+Ki+ES, the yield increase was the highest and mounted to 17.2% compared to NP, but the variability over the years was also the highest (CV ≈ 20%). The amount of N in grain N (GN) increased progressively from 4% for NPK-MOP to 15% for NPK-KK and 25% for NPK-KK+Ki+ES in comparison to NP. The nitrogen harvest index was highly stable, achieving 72.6 ± 3.1%. All analyzed NUE indices showed a significant response to FVs. The PFP-Nf (partial factor productivity of Nf) indices increased on NPK-MOP by 5.8%, NPK-KK by 12.9%, and NPK-KK+Ki+ES by 17.9% compared to NP. The corresponding Nf recovery of Nf in wheat grain was 47.2%, 55.9%, and 64.4%, but its total recovery by wheat (grain + straw) was 67%, 74.5%, and 87.2%, respectively. In terms of the theoretical and practical value of the tested indexes, two indices, namely, NUP (nitrogen unit productivity) and NUA (nitrogen unit accumulation), proved to be the most useful. From the farmer’s production strategy, FV with K applied in the form of Korn–Kali proved to be the most stable option due to high and stable yield, regardless of weather conditions. The increase in the number of nutritional factors optimizing the action of nitrogen in winter wheat caused the phenomenon known as the “scissors effect”. This phenomenon manifested itself in a progressive increase in nitrogen unit productivity (NUP) combined with a regressive trend in unit nitrogen accumulation (NUA) in the grain versus the balance of soil available Mg (Mgb). The studies clearly showed that obtaining grain that met the milling requirements was recorded only for NUA above 22 kg N t−1 grain. This was possible only with the most intensive Mg treatment (NPK-KK+Ki and NPK-KK+Ki+ES). The study clearly showed that three of the six FVs fully met the three basic conditions for sustainable crop production: (i) stabilization and even an increase in grain yield; (ii) a decrease in the mass of inorganic N in the soil at harvest, potentially susceptible to leaching; and (iii) stabilization of the soil fertility of P, K, and Mg. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Soil Fertility and Plant Nutrition for Sustainable Cropping Systems)
Show Figures

Figure 1

20 pages, 3953 KiB  
Article
Straw Returning Combined with Application of Sulfur-Coated Urea Improved Rice Yield and Nitrogen Use Efficiency Through Enhancing Carbon and Nitrogen Metabolism
by Guangxin Zhao, Kaiyu Gao, Ming Gao, Xiaotian Xu, Zeming Li, Xianzhi Yang, Ping Tian, Xiaoshuang Wei, Zhihai Wu and Meiying Yang
Agriculture 2025, 15(14), 1554; https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture15141554 - 19 Jul 2025
Viewed by 331
Abstract
Straw returning inhibits tillering at the early stage of rice growth and thus affects grain yield. Sulfur-coated urea (SCU) has been expected to increase nitrogen use efficiency (NUE) and yield, save labor input, and reduce environmental pollution in crop production. Nevertheless, the sulfur [...] Read more.
Straw returning inhibits tillering at the early stage of rice growth and thus affects grain yield. Sulfur-coated urea (SCU) has been expected to increase nitrogen use efficiency (NUE) and yield, save labor input, and reduce environmental pollution in crop production. Nevertheless, the sulfur coatings of SCU are easy to break and then shorten the nutrient release cycle. Whether there was a complementary effect between straw returning and SCU in NUE and grain yield had remained elusive. To investigate the effects of straw returning combined with the application of SCU on NUE and rice yield, a two-year field experiment was conducted from 2022 to 2023 with three treatments (straw returning combined with conventional urea (SRU), no straw returning combined with SCU (NRS), straw returning combined with SCU (SRS)). We found that straw returning combined with the application of SCU increased rice yield and NUE significantly. Compared with SRU and NRS, SRS treatments significantly increased grain yield by 14.61–16.22%, and 4.14–7.35%, respectively. Higher effective panicle numbers per m2 and grain numbers per panicle were recorded in NRS and SRS treatments than SRU. SRS treatment increased nitrogen recovery efficiency by 79.53% and 22.97%, nitrogen agronomic efficiency by 18.68% and 17.37%, and nitrogen partial factor productivity by 10.51% and 9.81% compared with SRU and NRS treatment, respectively. The enhanced NUE in SRS was driven by higher leaf area index, SPAD value, net photosynthetic rate, carbon metabolic enzyme (RuBP and SPS) activity, nitrogen metabolic enzyme (NR, GS, and GOGAT) activity, sucrose and nitrogen content in leaves, and nitrogen accumulation in plant during grain filling. Moreover, the improved yield in SRS was closely related to superior NUE. In conclusion, straw returning combined with application of SCU boosted grain yield and NUE via enhanced carbon–nitrogen metabolism during the late growth period in rice. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Effects of Crop Management on Yields)
Show Figures

Figure 1

26 pages, 3919 KiB  
Article
Impacts of Various Straw Mulching Strategies on Soil Water, Nutrients, Thermal Regimes, and Yield in Wheat–Soybean Rotation Systems
by Chaoyu Liao, Min Tang, Chao Zhang, Meihua Deng, Yan Li and Shaoyuan Feng
Plants 2025, 14(14), 2233; https://doi.org/10.3390/plants14142233 - 19 Jul 2025
Viewed by 336
Abstract
Straw mulching is an important strategy for regulating soil moisture, nutrient availability, and thermal conditions in agricultural systems. However, the mechanisms by which the mulching period, thickness, and planting density interact to influence yield formation in wheat–soybean rotation systems remain insufficiently understood. In [...] Read more.
Straw mulching is an important strategy for regulating soil moisture, nutrient availability, and thermal conditions in agricultural systems. However, the mechanisms by which the mulching period, thickness, and planting density interact to influence yield formation in wheat–soybean rotation systems remain insufficiently understood. In this study, we systematically examined the combined effects of straw mulching at the seedling and jointing stages of winter wheat, as well as varying mulching thicknesses and soybean planting densities, on soil properties and crop yields through field experiments. The experimental design included straw mulching treatments during the seedling stage (T1) and the jointing stage (T2) of winter wheat, with soybean planting densities classified as low (D1, 1.8 × 105 plants·ha−1) and high (D2, 3.6 × 105 plants·ha−1). Mulching thicknesses were set at low (S1, 2830.19 kg·ha−1), medium (S2, 8490.57 kg·ha−1), and high (S3, 14,150.95 kg·ha−1), in addition to a no-mulch control (CK) for each treatment. The results demonstrated that (1) straw mulching significantly increased soil water content in the order S3 > S2 > S1 > CK and exerted a temperature-buffering effect. This resulted in increases in soil organic carbon, available phosphorus, and available potassium by 1.88−71.95%, 1.36−165.8%, and 1.92−36.34%, respectively, while decreasing available nitrogen content by 1.42−17.98%. (2) The T1 treatments increased wheat yields by 1.22% compared to the control, while the T2 treatments resulted in a 23.83% yield increase. Soybean yields increased by 23.99% under D1 and by 36.22% under D2 treatments. (3) Structural equation modeling indicated that straw mulching influenced yields by modifying interactions among soil organic carbon, available nitrogen, available phosphorus, available potassium, bulk density, soil temperature, and soil water content. Wheat yields were primarily regulated by the synergistic effects of soil temperature, water content, and available potassium, whereas soybean yields were determined by the dynamic balance between organic carbon and available potassium. This study provides empirical evidence to inform the optimization of straw return practices in wheat–soybean rotation systems. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

12 pages, 921 KiB  
Article
Mixed Ensiling Increases Degradation Without Altering Attached Microbiota Through In Situ Ruminal Incubation Technique
by Xuanxuan Pu, Min Zhang, Jianjun Zhang, Xiumin Zhang, Shizhe Zhang, Bo Lin, Tianwei Wang, Zhiliang Tan and Min Wang
Animals 2025, 15(14), 2131; https://doi.org/10.3390/ani15142131 - 18 Jul 2025
Viewed by 216
Abstract
Mixed silage can disrupt the girder structure of rape straw, and thus facilitate ruminal degradation. Further investigation is warranted to validate this observation in vivo. The objective of this study was to investigate the degradation kinetics and bacterial colonization of mixed silage during [...] Read more.
Mixed silage can disrupt the girder structure of rape straw, and thus facilitate ruminal degradation. Further investigation is warranted to validate this observation in vivo. The objective of this study was to investigate the degradation kinetics and bacterial colonization of mixed silage during digestion using an in situ ruminal incubation technique. The experiment comprised two treatments: a mixture of rape straw and corn silage (control), and a mixed silage treatment of rape straw and whole crop corn (mixed silage). Three ruminally cannulated Holstein bulls were employed. Substrates were incubated for varying durations (4, 12, 24, 48, 72, 96, 120 and 216 h) to assess substrate degradation kinetics. Bacterial colonization were analyzed after 4- and 48-h incubation time. Mixed ensiling disrupted the fiber structure of rape straw, and thus had lower fiber content compared to the control, as NDF and ADF content ‌decreased by 55 g/kg (678 vs. 623 g/kg) and 27 g/kg (440 vs. 413 g/kg), respectively. Compared to the control group, ruminal DM disappearance of mixed silage significantly (p ≤ 0.05) increased from 315 to 366 g/kg (+16.2%) at an incubation time of 4 h, 552 to 638 g/kg (+15.6%) at 120 h, and 563 to 651 g/kg (+15.6%) at 216 h. Similarly, compared to the control group, NDF disappearance of mixed silage significantly (p ≤ 0.05) rose from 112 to 201 g/kg (+79.5%) at 4 h, 405 to 517 g/kg (+27.7%) at 120 h, and 429 to 532 g/kg (+24.0%) at 216 h. Compared to the control group, soluble and washout nutrient fractions (a) of DM or NDF fraction in mixed silage significantly (p ≤ 0.05) rose from 289 to 340 g/kg (+17.6%), potentially degradable fractions (b) of NDF increased from 310 to 370 g/kg (+19.4%), and the undegraded fraction of NDF (μNDF) decreased from 582 to 471 g/kg (−19.1%). Incubation time, apart from in the mixed ensiling treatment, altered the bacterial community. The study highlights that higher total potentially degradable fractions account for enhanced ruminal substrate degradation of mixed silage. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

20 pages, 2217 KiB  
Article
Organic Nitrogen Substitution Enhances Carbon Sequestration but Increases Greenhouse Gas Emissions in Maize Cropping Systems
by Yanan Liu, Xiaoqing Zhao, Yuchen Cheng, Rui Xie, Tiantian Meng, Liyu Chen, Yongfeng Ren, Chunlei Xue, Kun Zhao, Shuli Wei, Jing Fang, Xiangqian Zhang, Fengcheng Sun and Zhanyuan Lu
Agronomy 2025, 15(7), 1703; https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy15071703 - 15 Jul 2025
Viewed by 348
Abstract
Excessive chemical fertilizers degrade soil and increase greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. Organic substitution of nitrogen fertilizers is recognized as a sustainable agricultural-management practice, yet its dual role in carbon sequestration and emissions renders the net GHG balance (NGHGB) uncertain. To assess the GHG [...] Read more.
Excessive chemical fertilizers degrade soil and increase greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. Organic substitution of nitrogen fertilizers is recognized as a sustainable agricultural-management practice, yet its dual role in carbon sequestration and emissions renders the net GHG balance (NGHGB) uncertain. To assess the GHG mitigation potential of organic substitution strategies, this study analyzed GHG fluxes, soil organic carbon (SOC) dynamics, indirect GHG emissions, and Net Primary Productivity (NPP) based on a long-term field positioning experiment initiated in 2016. Six fertilizer regimes were systematically compared: no fertilizer control (CK); only phosphorus and potassium fertilizer (PK); total chemical fertilizer (NPK); 1/3 chemical N substituted with sheep manure (OF1); dual substitution protocol with 1/6 chemical N substituted by sheep manure and 1/6 substituted by straw-derived N (OF2); complete chemical N substitution with sheep manure (OF3). The results showed that OF1 and OF2 maintained crop yields similar to those under NPK, whereas OF3 reduced yield by over 10%; relative to NPK, OF1, OF2, and OF3 significantly increased SOC sequestration rates by 50.70–149.20%, reduced CH4 uptake by 7.9–70.63%, increased CO2 emissions by 1.4–23.9%, decreased N2O fluxes by 3.6–56.2%, and mitigated indirect GHG emissions from farm inputs by 24.02–63.95%. The NGHGB was highest under OF1, 9.44–23.99% greater than under NPK. These findings demonstrate that partial organic substitution increased carbon sequestration, maintained crop yields, whereas high substitution rates increase the risk of carbon emissions. The study results indicate that substituting 1/3 of chemical nitrogen with sheep manure in maize cropping systems represents an effective fertilizer management approach to simultaneously balance productivity and ecological sustainability. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Agroecology Innovation: Achieving System Resilience)
Show Figures

Figure 1

18 pages, 673 KiB  
Article
Effects of Tillage Methods on Carbon and Nitrogen Sequestration and Soil Microbial Stoichiometric Equilibrium in a Black Soil Farmland with Full Return of Straw to the Field
by Meiren Rong, Zhigang Wang, Xiangqian Zhang, Zhanyuan Lu, Lanfang Bai, Zhipeng Cheng, Tianhao Wang, Yajing Zhang, Hongwei Liang, Tiantian Meng, Lingyue Liu and Fang Luo
Agronomy 2025, 15(7), 1664; https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy15071664 - 9 Jul 2025
Viewed by 254
Abstract
Long-term irrational farming practices and low return of organic materials to the fields in the black soil area have led to reduced soil carbon and nitrogen stability and nutrient imbalance, which in turn affect soil fertility and crop yields. Straw return is an [...] Read more.
Long-term irrational farming practices and low return of organic materials to the fields in the black soil area have led to reduced soil carbon and nitrogen stability and nutrient imbalance, which in turn affect soil fertility and crop yields. Straw return is an effective way to enhance soil organic matter and crop productivity, but the effects of long-term straw return under tilling practices on carbon and nitrogen sequestration and soil microbial stoichiometric equilibrium in black soil need to be further investigated. This study investigated the physical, chemical and biological properties of the 0–60 cm soil layer under deep tillage with straw return to the field (DTS), deep harrow with straw return to the field (DHS), rotary tillage with straw return to the field (RTS), no tillage with straw return to the field (NTS), and conventional tillage with straw removal (CT) on the basis of seven consecutive years of tillage pattern location trials in the black soil area of eastern Inner Mongolia. The results showed that DTS and NTS significantly increased the soil organic carbon (SOC), soil total nitrogen (TN), soil microbial biomass carbon (MBC), soil microbial biomass nitrogen (MBN) contents, and the SOC/TN ratio in the 0–40 cm soil layer, enhancing soil carbon and nitrogen sequestration capacity, while the concomitant increase in the average MBC/MBN ratio in the plow layer from 6.8 to 8.2. The soil microbial quotient increased by 29.0% and 26.2%, respectively, and the stoichiometric imbalance ratio decreased by 7.9% and 5.7%, respectively. Meanwhile, in terms of maize yield from 2018 to 2024, DTS showed the most stable and significant yield increase with 41.53%. Whereas NTS showed a higher yield increase potential with a 27.36% increase in yield as the number of years of straw return increased. Therefore, DTS and NTS are superior tillage methods to improve the quality of the black soil tillage layer, to promote soil microbial carbon and nitrogen balance, and to increase crop yields. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Agroecology Innovation: Achieving System Resilience)
Show Figures

Figure 1

17 pages, 784 KiB  
Article
A Survey-Based Emission Inventory of Greenhouse Gases Released from Rice Production on Consolidated Land in the Red River Delta of Vietnam
by Dinh Thi Hai Van, Nguyen Thi Kim Oanh and Nguyen Thi Bich Yen
Atmosphere 2025, 16(7), 794; https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos16070794 - 30 Jun 2025
Viewed by 463
Abstract
In this study, relevant rice cultivation data were collected through a local survey, and the life cycle assessment (LCA) method was employed to quantify greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from rice production on consolidated land in the Red River Delta (RRD). Systematic sampling was [...] Read more.
In this study, relevant rice cultivation data were collected through a local survey, and the life cycle assessment (LCA) method was employed to quantify greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from rice production on consolidated land in the Red River Delta (RRD). Systematic sampling was used in face-to-face interviews with 45 rice farming households in a representative commune of Hai Duong province. Specific GHG emissions were significantly higher in the summer crop (averaged at 11.4 t CO2-eq/ha or 2.2 t CO2-eq/t grain) than in the spring crop (6.8 t CO2-eq/ha or 1.2 t CO2-eq/t grain). Methane was a dominant GHG emitted from paddy fields, contributing 84% of the total emissions of CO2-eq in the summer crop and 73% in the spring crop. Fertilizer use and N2O emissions accounted for 9% of emissions in the summer crop and 16% in the spring crop. Energy consumption for machinery and irrigation added a further 4% and 8%, respectively. Annually, as of 2023, the rice production activities in the RRD release 7.3 Tg of CO2-eq (100 years), a significant contribution to the national GHG emissions. GHG emissions under alternative scenarios of rice straw management were assessed. This study highlights the role of land consolidation in improving water management, which contributes to lowering emissions. Based on the findings, several mitigation measures could be identified, including improved irrigation practices, optimized fertilizer use, and the promotion of sustainable rice straw management practices. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

31 pages, 7991 KiB  
Review
Research and Overview of Crop Straw Chopping and Returning Technology and Machine
by Peng Liu, Chunyu Song, Jin He, Rangling Li, Min Cheng, Chao Zhang, Qinliang Li, Haihong Zhang and Mingxu Wang
Machines 2025, 13(7), 564; https://doi.org/10.3390/machines13070564 - 28 Jun 2025
Viewed by 323
Abstract
Crop straw chopping and returning technology has gained global implementation to enhance soil structure and fertility, facilitating increased crop yield. Nevertheless, technological adoption faces challenges from inherent limitations in machinery performance, including poor chopping and returning quality and high energy consumption. Consequently, this [...] Read more.
Crop straw chopping and returning technology has gained global implementation to enhance soil structure and fertility, facilitating increased crop yield. Nevertheless, technological adoption faces challenges from inherent limitations in machinery performance, including poor chopping and returning quality and high energy consumption. Consequently, this review first presented a theoretical framework that described the mechanical properties of straw, its fracture dynamics, interactions with airflow, and motion characteristics during the chopping process. Then, based on the straw returning process, the chopping devices were classified into five types: the chopped blade, the chopping machine, the chopping device combined with a no-tillage or reduced-tillage seeder, the chopping and ditch-burying machine, the chopping and mixing machine, and the harvester-powered chopping device. Advancements in spreading devices were also summarized. Finally, six key directions for future research were proposed: developing an intelligent field straw distribution mapping system, engineering adaptive self-regulating mechanisms for chopping and returning equipment, elucidating the mechanics and kinematics of straw in the chopping and returning process, implementing real-time quality assessment systems for straw returning operations, pioneering high forward-speed (>8 km/h) straw returning machines, and establishing context-specific straw residue management frameworks. This review provided a reference and offered support for the global application of straw returning technology. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Machine Design and Theory)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop