Search Results (230)

Background: Patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) require effective bracing to control curve progression. However, most traditional spinal braces commonly pose challenges in terms of undesired bulkiness and restricted mobility. Recent advancements have focused on innovative brace designs, utilizing novel materials and structural configurations to improve wearability and functionality. However, it remains unclear how effective these next-generation braces are biomechanically compared to traditional braces. Objectives: This review aimed to analyze the design features of next-generation AIS braces and assess their biomechanical effectiveness via reviewing contemporary studies. Methods: Studies on newly designed scoliosis braces over the past decade were searched in databases, including Web of Science, PubMed, ScienceDirect, Wiley, EBCOHost and SpringerLink. The Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal Checklist for Cohort Studies was adopted to evaluate the quality of the included studies. The data extracted for biomechanical effect analysis included brace components/materials, design principle, interfacial pressure, morphological changes, and intercomparison parameters. Results: A total of 19 studies encompassing 12 different kinds of braces met the inclusion/exclusion criteria. Clinical effectiveness was reported in 14 studies, with an average short-term Cobb angle correction of 25.4% (range: 12.41–34.3%) and long-term correction of 18.22% (range: 15.79–19.3%). This result aligned broadly with the previously reported efficacy of the traditional braces in short-term cases (range: 12.36–31.33%), but was lower than the long-term ones (range: 23.02–33.6%). Two included studies reported an interface pressure range between 6.0 kPa and 24.4 kPa for novel braces, which was comparable to that of the traditional braces (4.8–30.0 kPa). Additionally, five of six studies reported the trunk asymmetric parameters and demonstrated improvement in trunk alignment. Conclusions: This study demonstrates that most newly designed scoliosis braces could achieve comparable biomechanical efficacy to the conventional designs, particularly in interface pressure management and Cobb angle correction. However, future clinical adoption of these novel braces requires further improvements of ergonomic design and three-dimensional correction, as well as more investigation and rigorous evidence on the long-term treatment outcomes and cost-effectiveness. Full article

Background/Objectives: To compare the radiographic, perioperative, and patient-reported outcomes between anterior vertebral body tethering (VBT) and posterior spinal fusion (PSF) in adolescents with idiopathic scoliosis. Methods: A systematic search of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar was performed through May 2025. Studies directly comparing anterior VBT and PSF in skeletally immature patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis were included. Data were pooled using random-effects meta-analysis and expressed as mean differences (MDs) or odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). The NIH quality assessment tool was used to evaluate risk of bias. Results: Ten studies comprising 1168 patients (573 VBT, 595 PSF) were included. At 2 years, VBT showed a significantly greater main thoracic curve (MD = 5.03°; 95% CI: 1.87–8.20) and proximal thoracic curve (MD = 3.27°; 95% CI: 1.16–5.38), but no difference in lumbar or main curve Cobb angles. VBT was associated with significantly reduced thoracic kyphosis (MD = −2.68°), increased T1 tilt (MD = 1.50°), shorter operative time (MD = −99.23 min), less blood loss (MD = −405.44 mL), and shorter hospital stay (MD = −1.34 days). However, VBT had a significantly higher revision rate (OR = 5.54; 95% CI: 2.81–10.94). No significant differences were noted in SRS-22 domains, except for higher mental health scores in the VBT group (MD = 0.56; 95% CI: 0.07–1.06). Conclusions: Anterior VBT offers perioperative advantages and comparable radiographic correction to PSF in selected adolescents with idiopathic scoliosis, but at the cost of higher revision rates. Full article

Background and Objectives: The assessment of cervical lordosis is essential for surgical planning and outcome prediction in patients with cervical spine pathology. This study aims to evaluate the accuracy of cervical lordosis measurements obtained on supine CT and MRI relative to standing lateral radiographs. Materials and Methods: In this retrospective review, 108 patients who underwent standing lateral radiographs, supine CT, and MRI within a 30-day period were identified. C2–C7 Cobb angles were measured on each modality. Using upright radiographs as the reference standard, the predictive capability of both supine CT and supine MRI in classifying kyphotic versus non-kyphotic alignment was calculated. Results: Standing radiographs demonstrated significantly greater lordosis than supine imaging, with mean paired differences of 6.2° versus CT and 5.0° versus MRI (both p < 0.001); however, strong correlations were observed (with CT: r = 0.75; with MRI: r = 0.72; both p < 0.001). Further, CT-based measurements predicted X-ray Cobb angles with an R² value of 0.57 (estimated X-ray Cobb angle = 8.24 + 0.74 × (CT Cobb angle), β = 0.74, p < 0.001). MRI-based measurements yielded an R² of 0.51 (estimated X-ray Cobb angle = 7.59 + 0.71 × (MRI Cobb angle), β = 0.71, p < 0.001). At threshold ≥ 0°, CT achieved a 100% NPV for excluding kyphosis on upright radiographs. MRI achieved an NPV of 100% when the Cobb angle was >1.20°. Conclusions: Supine CT and MRI systematically underestimate cervical lordosis but demonstrate strong predictive correlation with standing radiographs and reliably exclude true kyphotic alignment, with each achieving near-perfect NPV at defined thresholds. In cases where standing radiographs are unavailable or nondiagnostic, supine imaging modalities such as CT and/or MRI, where the cervical region appears nonkyphotic, can safely rule out cervical kyphosis and inform surgical planning; however, in cases where the cervical region appears kyphotic on CT and/or MRI, standing radiographs remain essential for accurate assessment. Full article

This study aimed to evaluate the reliability of an AI-based software tool in measuring spinal parameters—Cobb angle, thoracic kyphosis, lumbar lordosis, and pelvic obliquity—compared to manual measurements by radiologists and to assess potential time savings. In this retrospective monocentric study, 56 patients who underwent full-spine weight-bearing X-rays were analyzed. Measurements were independently performed by an experienced radiologist, a radiology resident, and the AI software. A consensus between two senior experts established the ground truth. Lin’s Concordance Correlation Coefficient (CCC), mean absolute error (MAE), ICC, and paired t-tests were used for statistical analysis. The AI software showed excellent agreement with human readers (CCC > 0.9) and demonstrated lower MAE than the resident in Cobb angle and lumbar lordosis measurements but slightly underperformed in thoracic kyphosis and pelvic obliquity. Importantly, the AI significantly reduced analysis time compared to both the experienced radiologist and the resident (p < 0.001). These findings suggest that the AI tool offers a reliable and time-efficient alternative to manual spinal measurements and may enhance accuracy for less experienced radiologists. Full article

Background and Clinical Significance: The study aims to investigate the application of the Rovatti Method^® in improving Cobb angles, angle of trunk rotation (ATR), aesthetics, and quality of life in the conservative treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS); Case Presentation: The case concerns the application of the Rovatti Method^® in treating a 13-year-old girl with mild right thoracolumbar AIS. This method involves the use of elastic bands designed to guide and enhance proprioceptive and mechanical stimuli during the patient’s active self-correction exercises. The treatment lasted 7 months; a radiographic control showed an improvement in the right thoracolumbar curve, with Cobb angles decreasing from 21° to 14°, ATR from 10° to 8°, TRACE (Trunk Aesthetic Clinical Evaluation) decreasing from 8 to 4 points, and the Scoliosis Research questionnaire (SRS-22) improving from 2.27 to 3.05 points. Conclusions: Concerning this hypothesis-generating observation case, the Rovatti Method^® may represent a kinesiological approach for the treatment of AIS, potentially contributing to improvements in Cobb angles, ATR, aesthetics, and quality of life. Full article

Background: Thoracic kyphosis has been increasingly associated with altered intra-abdominal and diaphragmatic dynamics, potentially contributing to gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and hiatal hernia (HH). While previous studies have shown a relationship between spinal deformities and GERD symptoms, these findings have been largely observational, with few morphometric analyses. No prior study has directly quantified the relationship between thoracic curvature and hiatal surface area (HSA) using standardized computed tomography (CT)-based methods. Furthermore, existing studies have typically focused on patients with visible hernias, limiting understanding of early, subclinical anatomical changes. This study addresses this gap by evaluating whether thoracic kyphosis is associated with measurable hiatal enlargement, even in the absence of overt HH. Methods: In this retrospective, single-center study, 100 adult patients (50 with thoracic kyphosis, defined as a Cobb angle of ≥50° and 50 age- and sex-matched controls) underwent multidetector CT (MDCT). Hiatal surface area (HSA) was measured on a standardized oblique axial plane aligned with the diaphragmatic crura. Correlation and multivariable regression analyses were performed to assess relationships between Cobb angle and HSA. Results: The kyphosis group showed significantly larger HSA than controls (5.14 ± 1.31 cm² vs. 3.59 ± 0.74 cm²; p < 0.001). A moderate positive correlation was found between Cobb angle and HSA (r = 0.336, p = 0.017). Multivariable analysis identified the Cobb angle as an independent predictor of HSA (β = 0.028; p = 0.017), while age and sex were not significant predictors. No overt herniation was present in any subject. Conclusions: This is the first CT-based morphometric study to demonstrate that thoracic kyphosis is associated with hiatal enlargement, even in the absence of overt herniation. These findings support the hypothesis that postural spinal deformities may predispose individuals to GERD by structurally remodeling the diaphragmatic hiatus. Full article

Background: Functional X-ray imaging of the cervical spine in flexion and extension remains a fundamental, objective method for mobility assessment. However, there remains no consensus on how to perform the measurements or which indicators are most useful in clinical practice. Methods: This study included 288 participants (197 female and 91 male); these included patients without CDD signs or with first-degree cervical spine CDD according to the Kellgren–Lawrence criteria. Cobb angle C2–C7, HDI, ROM, CIF, and CIE were measured. Results: The most significant correlations were observed for HDI, and the strongest correlations were between CIF measurements. The greatest mobility was noted for the centrally located segments of the cervical spine, particularly at the C4–C5 level. Conclusions: HDI appears to be the most reliable parameter for characterizing the mobility of the cervical spine. It is precise and has the highest number of correlations with other measurements, but it is very time-consuming. Cobb angle C2–C7 combines ease of performance with good diagnostic value. Full article

Background/Objectives: Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) is a three-dimensional spinal deformity often requiring surgical correction in severe cases. Halo-gravity traction (HGT) is commonly employed preoperatively to enhance spinal flexibility and reduce curve severity. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of HGT in reducing Cobb angles in AIS and to assess how patient age, skeletal maturity (Risser score), and curve type (Lenke classification) influence treatment response. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of 28 AIS patients with Cobb angles > 65° who underwent preoperative HGT followed by posterior spinal fusion. Traction was applied for a mean of 24.64 days, reaching 40–50% of each patient’s body weight. Radiographic measurements were collected pre-traction, post-traction, and postoperatively. Statistical analyses included paired t-tests, Pearson correlations, Kruskal–Wallis tests, and linear regression. Results: Mean primary Cobb angle was reduced from 82.46° pre-traction to 61.00° post-traction (26.09% reduction) and further to 29.54° postoperatively (64.58% total reduction). Similar reductions were observed in secondary curves. No statistically significant correlations were found between age or Risser score and the magnitude of correction. Lenke type 3 showed the highest traction response, while type 5 had the greatest surgical gain. Curve type and skeletal maturity did not significantly affect final outcomes. Conclusions: Halo-gravity traction is a safe and effective adjunct in the surgical treatment of severe AIS, achieving substantial Cobb angle reduction. The degree of correction was not significantly influenced by age, Risser score, or curve type, supporting the broad applicability of HGT across adolescent patients. Full article

Background/Objectives: We sought to characterize the variance and overlap among definitions of Proximal Junctional Kyphosis (PJK) used in the adult spinal deformity (ASD) literature. PJK is defined as excess in PJK angle, a Cobb angle between the upper-instrumented vertebra (UIV) and a supra-adjacent vertebra (SAV), either one (UIV+1) or two (UIV+2) levels rostral of the UIV. No expert consensus exists for threshold angle or which SAV to use. Methods: A total of 116 thoracolumbar fusion patients ≥ 65 years old were reviewed. The UIV+1 and UIV+2 angles were measured. Six definitions of PJK from the literature were evaluated. These definitions were selected based on citation frequency, historical relevance, and accessibility through commonly used databases. Pearson’s Chi-squared and pairwise comparisons were performed to evaluate the distinctness and agreement rates among these definitions. Results: The six definitions of PJK were as follows: [PJK20] PJK angle ≥ 20° with UIV+2 as the (SAV), [PJK10] PJK angle ≥ 10° with a >10° change from pre-op with UIV+2 as the SAV, [PJK2SD] PJK angle > 2 standard deviations from average with UIV+1 as the SAV, [PJK10+10] PJK angle ≥ 10° with a >10° change from pre-op with UIV+1 as the SAV, [PJK15] PJK angle > 15° with UIV+1 as the SAV, and [PJK30] PJK angle > 30° with UIV+2 as the SAV, or displaced rod fracture, or reoperation within 2 years for junctional failure, pseudoarthrosis, or rod fracture. [PJK10] and [PJK2SD] were the most distinct definitions while [PJK20], [PJK10+10], [PJK15], and [PJK30] showed no significant pairwise differences. [PJK2SD] was stringent, while definition [PJK30] included unique diagnostic information not captured by other definitions. Conclusions: The use of [PJK20], [PJK10+10], [PJK15], or [PJK30] is recommended for consistency, with [PJK15] presenting the best balance. Stringent [PJK2SD] may be beneficial for identifying severe PJK, though with low sensitivity. Overall, PJK definitions must be standardized for the consistent reporting of clinical outcomes and research comparability. Full article

Background: A precise radiographic evaluation of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) is essential for effective treatment planning and follow-up. The pelvic axial rotation (PAR) and horizontal balance of the pelvis are critical factors to consider throughout the treatment and monitoring of AIS. While some previous studies have examined spinal curvature in relation to PAR direction and the direction of the major curve (DMC) in AIS patients, this study aims to explore the relationship between scoliosis morphology, pelvic axial rotation (PAR), and the direction of the major curve in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Methods: Radiographic images of 397 patients diagnosed with AIS between 2023 and 2024 at a Tertiary Referral Hospital were retrospectively evaluated. Morphological and morphometric measurements, including sex, Lenke and Risser classifications, lower leg discrepancy, Cobb angle, PAR direction, and major curvature direction, were performed. Results: The mean age of the 397 patients (246 female, 151 male) was 14.47 ± 2.29. There is no significant correlation between PAR and DMC (p = 0.919). No significant differences were found in terms of sex (p = 0.603). Regardless of the PAR direction, major curvature was more common on the left side (57.7%). Furthermore, a positive correlation was noted between the Cobb angle and LLD. Conclusions: Our study contributes to a growing body of literature questioning the deterministic role of PAR in AIS. While previous reports have emphasized the directional correlation between the pelvis and spinal curvature, our findings suggest that pelvic rotation may not be a reliable indicator of curve direction in all patients. This highlights the complexity of AIS biomechanics and underscores the need for individualized radiographic and clinical evaluation rather than a reliance on generalized compensatory models. Full article

Background/Objectives: Surgical treatment is generally recommended for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) when the Cobb angle exceeds 50 degrees even after skeletal maturity or 40 degrees with remaining growth potential. However, limited evidence exists regarding the natural history of curves between 40 and 50 degrees during the late stage of skeletal growth. This study aimed to evaluate the curve progression in AIS patients with a curve between 40 and 50 degrees at Risser stage IV or V. Methods: The inclusion criteria were as follows: (1) AIS patients at the late stage of skeletal growth (Risser IV or V) and a (2) curve between 40 and 50 degrees, with a minimum follow-up of 5 years. Sex, age, the magnitude of the curve, the location of the apex, Risser stage, height, and weight were measured at the baseline and the final follow-up. Curve progression was defined as an increase in the Cobb angle of ≥5 degrees. Patients were also categorized based on whether their final Cobb angle was <50 or ≥50 degrees to evaluate additional risk factors. Results: A total of 97 patients were included, with a mean follow-up of 97 months. Their mean age was 14.6 years at the baseline and 22.6 years at the final follow-up. The mean Cobb angle increased from 42.6 to 45.1 degrees, with a mean change of 2.7 degrees and an annual progression rate of 0.35 degrees. Curve progression was observed in 38 patients (39.2%), and 24 patients (24.7%) reached a final Cobb angle ≥ 50 degrees. Younger age (p = 0.004) and Risser stage IV (p = 0.014) were significantly associated with curve progression. In patients with a final Cobb angle ≥ 50 degrees, Risser stage IV (p = 0.050) and a larger baseline curve magnitude (p = 0.045) were also significant risk factors. Conclusions: In AIS patients at the late stage of skeletal growth, 39.2% experienced significant curve progression. A younger age and Risser stage IV were identified as risk factors for curve progression. A larger baseline curve magnitude and Risser stage IV were also associated with a final Cobb angle ≥ 50 degrees. Full article

Background and Objectives: General-purpose multimodal large language models (LLMs) are increasingly used for medical image interpretation despite lacking clinical validation. This study evaluates the diagnostic reliability of ChatGPT-4o and Claude 2 in photographic assessment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) against radiological standards. This study examines two critical questions: whether families can derive reliable preliminary assessments from LLMs through analysis of clinical photographs and whether LLMs exhibit cognitive fidelity in their visuospatial reasoning capabilities for AIS assessment. Materials and Methods: A prospective diagnostic accuracy study (STARD-compliant) analyzed 97 adolescents (74 with AIS and 23 with postural asymmetry). Standardized clinical photographs (nine views/patient) were assessed by two LLMs and two orthopedic residents against reference radiological measurements. Primary outcomes included diagnostic accuracy (sensitivity/specificity), Cobb angle concordance (Lin’s CCC), inter-rater reliability (Cohen’s κ), and measurement agreement (Bland–Altman LoA). Results: The LLMs exhibited hazardous diagnostic inaccuracy: ChatGPT misclassified all non-AIS cases (specificity 0% [95% CI: 0.0–14.8]), while Claude 2 generated 78.3% false positives. Systematic measurement errors exceeded clinical tolerance: ChatGPT overestimated thoracic curves by +10.74° (LoA: −21.45° to +42.92°), exceeding tolerance by >800%. Both LLMs showed inverse biomechanical concordance in thoracolumbar curves (CCC ≤ −0.106). Inter-rater reliability fell below random chance (ChatGPT κ = −0.039). Universal proportional bias (slopes ≈ −1.0) caused severe curve underestimation (e.g., 10–15° error for 50° deformities). Human evaluators demonstrated superior bias control (0.3–2.8° vs. 2.6–10.7°) but suboptimal specificity (21.7–26.1%) and hazardous lumbar concordance (CCC: −0.123). Conclusions: General-purpose LLMs demonstrate clinically unacceptable inaccuracy in photographic AIS assessment, contraindicating clinical deployment. Catastrophic false positives, systematic measurement errors exceeding tolerance by 480–1074%, and inverse diagnostic concordance necessitate urgent regulatory safeguards under frameworks like the EU AI Act. Neither LLMs nor photographic human assessment achieve reliability thresholds for standalone screening, mandating domain-specific algorithm development and integration of 3D modalities. Full article

Background: Lateral lumbar or thoracic interbody fusion (LLIF) is increasingly considered for anterior column reconstruction and restoring segmental lordosis in degenerative, infectious, or deformity conditions. Reports about using LLIF with expandable interbody spacers for spine trauma are scarce. Methods: In this retrospective, single-center observational cohort study, we reviewed all patients treated by an expandable LLIF interbody spacer (ELSA^® Expandable Integrated LLIF Spacer, Globus Medical Inc) for trauma indication at our spine center between September 2018 and January 2024. The primary outcome measures were fusion rate at 12 months, change in segmental sagittal Cobb angle, and clinical outcome according to the MacNab criteria. Secondary outcomes included adverse events and complications. Results: We identified n = 21 patients with a mean age of 48.3 (standard deviation (SD) 15.7), 47.6% were female. LLIF was mostly performed at T11/12 (n = 4; 19.1%) and T12/L1 (n = 10; 47.5%). Indications were AO Spine type A2 (n = 4, 19.1%), A3 (n = 14; 66.7%) or A4 fractures (n = 3; 14.3%) with ligamentous (B2-type) in eight (38.1%) and hyperextension (B3-type) injury in one patient (4.8%). Surgery included the release of the anterior longitudinal ligament in four cases (19.1%). Intraoperative AEs were noted in n = 1 (4.8%), postoperative AEs in n = 3 (14.3%) at discharge, n = 4 (19.1%) at three, and n = 2 (9.5%) at twelve months. Segmental sagittal Cobb angle changed from 1.3° (preoperative) to 13.3° at twelve months (p < 0.001). Functional outcome was excellent/good in n = 15 (71.4%; four missing) at 12 months. The fusion rate at the LLIF level was 100% at the 12-month follow-up. Conclusions: LLIF with expandable interbody spacers for spine trauma (off-label use) is safe, promotes solid fusion (100% fusion rate at 12 months), and enables correction of sagittal segmental Cobb angle (mean improvement of 12°), with good or excellent clinical outcomes in most patients (71.4%). Full article

Background/Objectives: Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis (AIS) is a lateral curvature of the spine combined with rotation and associated postural changes. Curves are classified according to direction and the spinal region, with right thoracic curves being a common presentation. Curve magnitude is measured using Cobb angles on radiographs and is used to monitor curve progression, with one of the main aims of treatment being prevention of progression to surgical levels. Treatment options may include observation, physiotherapeutic scoliosis-specific exercises (PSSE), thoracolumbosacral orthotic (TLSO) bracing, or surgery and are dependent on curve magnitude, risk of progression, and patient goals. Methods: This case series includes five patients (four female and one male, mean age of 14.8 y) who received previous non-surgical treatment without success and had severe right thoracic AIS with an average Cobb angle measurement of 53.4°, involving spinal curve magnitudes that warrant surgical recommendation. Results: These patients’ curves were successfully reduced to nonsurgical levels utilizing a non-surgical, multimodal treatment approach combining 3D corrective TLSO bracing using the ScoliBrace^®, PSSEs, and spinal rehabilitation over an average of 37.0 months. The average Cobb angle reduced from 53.4° to 29.6° (44.6% reduction) after being weaned off treatment. Conclusions: This series has shown successful, clinically significant improvement in Cobb angle and trunk symmetry in five patients with severe AIS using a non-surgical, multimodal approach combining 3D corrective TLSO bracing using the ScoliBrace^® and spinal rehabilitation procedures. Further investigation into this multimodal non-surgical approach for children, parents, and healthcare providers and policymakers seeking an alternative to surgical intervention for AIS is warranted. Full article

Background: Severe scoliosis can lead to chronic low back pain (cLBP) and may progress in adulthood. While day-time bracing is commonly used to alleviate pain and improve function, the role of night-time bracing remains unclear. This study aimed to assess the six-month effectiveness of a custom-made night-time brace in reducing pain in adults with scoliosis, compared to a prefabricated brace worn for 2–4 h during the day. Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted at a tertiary outpatient clinic specializing in spinal deformities. Adults with scoliosis (≥30° Cobb) and cLBP were divided into two groups: the study group used a custom-made night-time thoracolumbosacral orthosis (TLSO), while the control group wore a prefabricated brace (Peak) for 2–4 h daily. Pain and functional outcomes were assessed at baseline and after six months. Results: The study group included 25 women (mean age, 62.3 ± 9.5 years; Cobb angle, 60.4 ± 17.7°) who wore the night-time brace for an average of 7.2 ± 2.2 h per night. The control group comprised 20 women (mean age, 67.8 ± 10.5 years; Cobb angle, 61.9 ± 12.6°). At six months, the worst pain significantly improved in the TLSO group compared to the Peak group (F = 6.32, p = 0.0158). However, no statistically significant differences were observed between groups for back pain, leg pain, Core Outcome Measures Index (COMI), or Oswestry Disability Index (ODI). Conclusions: Night-time bracing shows interesting results on pain at six months in adults with severe scoliosis and back pain. These preliminary results open a new perspective that needs further verification and will help design more robust studies to verify what we found and identify the population more responsive to this approach. Full article