Search Results (37)

Background: Algorithm-based insulin dosing systems are increasingly used in hospitals and have shown the potential to efficiently and safely enable glycemic control. The goal of this study was to evaluate glycemic control using the ultralong-acting basal insulin degludec (IDeg) in combination with insulin aspart (IAsp) within an algorithm-driven electronic clinical decision support system (cDSS) in inpatients with type 2 diabetes (T2D). Methods: In this non-controlled single-arm pilot study, an electronic, algorithm-based cDSS was applied for the management of insulin treatment in an internal general ward. Thirty hospitalized patients with T2D (18 female, age 74.1 ± 10.9 years, HbA1c 72.4 ± 22.3 mmol/mol, BMI 28.6 ± 5.6 kg/m², diabetes duration 13.2 ± 11.6 years, creatinine 1.5 ± 1.2 mg/dL, length of hospital stay 9.1 ± 4.0 days) were included in the study. Capillary blood glucose (BG) was evaluated four times daily using a point-of-care device integrated into the hospital information system. In addition, all participants received a blinded continuous glucose monitoring (CGM; Abbott Freestyle Libre Pro) system. The primary endpoint was defined as the percentage of BG measurements within the target range of 3.9–7.8 mmol/L. Results: Overall, 722 BG values and 17,242 CGM data points were available. Of those, 52.2% and 55.0% were in the specified target area (3.9–7.8 mmol/L), respectively. Mean BG prior to study start was 11.9 ± 4.4 mmol/L and improved to 7.5 ± 1.9 mmol/L and 7.4 ± 1.4 mmol/L after 6 and 10 days of treatment. BG < 3.9, <3.0 and <2.2 mmol/L was 1.25%, 0.28% and 0%, respectively. Adherence to the total daily insulin dose suggested by the cDSS was 94.2%, and 99.5% of all basal and 85.3% of all bolus insulin suggestions were accepted by the nurses in charge. Basal-bolus therapy using the cDSS covered 85% of the participants’ total hospital stay. Conclusions: Glycemic control using IDeg within an algorithm-driven cDSS could effectively and safely be achieved in the hospital and was highly accepted. Full article

Background and Objectives: Continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) improves glycemic control in type 2 diabetes (T2DM), but its effects on diabetes-related distress and quality of life (QoL), particularly in patients on intensive insulin therapy, are less well studied. Aim: We aim to assess the impact of CGM on glycemic control, diabetes distress, and QoL in adults with T2DM on intensified insulin therapy. Materials and Methods: This prospective observational study included 226 adults with T2DM using multiple daily insulin injections or basal–bolus therapy. CGM was initiated at baseline. HbA1c, fasting glucose, and lipid profile were measured at baseline, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months. Diabetes-related distress (DDS-17) and quality of life (MDQoL-17) were assessed at the same time points. Longitudinal changes were analyzed using linear mixed-effects models. Results: Mean age was 66 ± 9.1 years; 55% were male. HbA1c decreased from 8.56 ± 1.87% to 7.20 ± 0.90% at 3 months (p < 0.001) and remained improved at 12 months (7.21 ± 1.04%). Diabetes distress declined significantly over time (β = −0.025/month; p = 0.001). Older age and lower income were associated with higher distress. Quality of life improved significantly during follow-up; higher income predicted better QoL, while greater distress predicted poorer QoL. HbA1c did not independently influence QoL. CGM metrics (GMI, mean glucose, TIR, glycemic variability) remained stable after initial improvement. Conclusions: In 226 insulin-treated T2DM patients, implementation of CGM as part of a structured insulin intensification strategy was associated with sustained improvements in glycaemic control, reduced diabetes-related distress, and enhanced quality of life over 12 months. These findings support routine CGM use and highlight the importance of addressing psychosocial outcomes in diabetes care. Full article

Background: Glucocorticoid-induced hyperglycemia is common amongst hospitalized patients. Isophane insulin has been proposed as part of the optimal insulin regimen for managing this, but there are few randomized controlled trials to support this. Our aim was to determine if the addition of a morning dose of isophane insulin would improve glycemic control amongst patients with COVID-19 who had dexamethasone-induced hyperglycemia (DIH) in hospital. Methods: Patients with diabetes admitted to hospital with COVID-19 respiratory infection and treated with dexamethasone were cluster-randomized by ward to receive either basal bolus insulin (BBI) or isophane-augmented BBI (IaBBI) in equipotent doses. Insulin commencement and titration were guided by standardized protocols. The primary outcome was overall finger-prick blood glucose (BG) levels, with predefined secondary outcomes of BGs on day 3 and the final day of admission. Results: A total of 40 patients were included, 25 in the IaBBI group and 15 in the BBI only group, for a duration of 5.4 ± 2.2 days. Both recruitment and the trial were terminated early because of a rapid decline in COVID-19 admissions. There were no differences in overall mean BG levels (IaBBI 11.9 ± 2.5 mmol/L vs. BBI 12.6 ± 2.4 mmol/L, p = 0.193) between the groups. Mean day 3 BGs were lower in the IaBBI group than in the BBI group (11.1 ± 3.5 mmol/L vs. 12.7 ± 3.5 mmol/L, p = 0.029) and on the final day (9.6 ± 2.8 mmol/L vs. 10.7 ± 2.5 mmol/L, respectively, p = 0.011). Conclusions: The restricted sample size in this study limits any conclusions that can be made regarding the effectiveness of the addition of isophane insulin to a BBI insulin regimen for diabetes patients with COVID-19 infection and DIH. However, some improvements in glycemic control were observed, suggesting that this is a glucose management strategy that warrants further evaluation. Full article

Background: Glucocorticoid-induced hyperglycemia (GCIH) is a common adverse effect of glucocorticoid (GC) therapy. Although evidence on oral antidiabetic medications (OADMs) for GCIH is emerging, direct comparisons with insulin therapy remain limited. This study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of OADMs and sliding scale insulin (SSI) in patients with autoimmune diseases who developed GCIH. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 97 patients who developed GCIH during GC therapy equivalent to ≥20 mg/day of prednisolone. Patients were classified into SSI-only (n = 41), OADM (n = 31), and basal–bolus/basal or bolus insulin (BBI/BI) (n = 25) groups. The primary endpoint was mean preprandial blood glucose (BG), adjusted for patient characteristics. Secondary outcomes included hospital stay, hypoglycemia, insulin use, and glycated hemoglobin. Results: In univariate analysis, the mean preprandial BG levels during the treatment period were significantly associated with the mean initial preprandial BG levels. Adjusted mean preprandial BG during treatment did not differ significantly between the OADM and SSI-only groups, whereas the BBI/BI group had higher pre-breakfast BG (p = 0.016). Among first-time GC users, those in the OADM group using cyclophosphamide had significantly lower fasting BG than non-users (p = 0.011). Conclusions: In patients with autoimmune diseases receiving ≥20 mg/day GC, OADM provided glycemic control comparable to SSI with similar hypoglycemia risk. Early preprandial BG levels during the first 3 days of GC therapy may help predict glycemic outcomes. Prospective studies with standardized regimens are needed to optimize GCIH management. Full article

This study investigated the prevalence of cystic fibrosis-related diabetes (CFRD) in the Croatian cystic fibrosis (CF) population, the age at diagnosis, insulin requirements, and the relationship between age at diagnosis and other clinical parameters. Medical records from 152 patients with genetically and laboratory-confirmed CF were reviewed through to 2025. The American Diabetes Association criteria were used to diagnose CFRD. Anthropometric and clinical data were collected from the latest medical records. A total of 17 out of 152 patients had CFRD, with a prevalence of 4.8% in the paediatric population (4/84) and 19.1% in adults (13/68). The median age of CFRD diagnosis was 14 years (range 9–22 years, SD = 3.95). Thirteen patients used insulin: one used bolus only, seven used basal-bolus multiple daily injections, and five used insulin pumps. The average total daily insulin (TDI) per kilogram (kg) body weight was 0.447 U/kg (SD = 0.429). The age at CFRD diagnosis was positively correlated with the body mass index (BMI) (p = 0.029). Patients requiring insulin by age 15 had higher TDI and were more likely to have CF liver disease (p = 0.027, p = 0.037, respectively). The prevalence of CFRD and age at diagnosis aligned with previous studies. Patients diagnosed at a younger age and requiring insulin earlier had lower BMIs, likely due to a faster decline in beta cell function and earlier onset of insulinopenia. Full article

Background and Clinical Significance: Lung cancer, a leading cause of global cancer diagnoses, maintains the highest mortality risk despite advances in treatment. Immunotherapy agents, such as anti-programmed death-1/programmed death ligand-1 (PD-1/PD-L1), have revolutionized care for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, the success is tempered by the emergence of immune-mediated adverse reactions, including the rare onset of type I diabetes. The incidence of diabetes mellitus increased during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. While there are several cases of new-onset diabetes after COVID-19 and COVID-19 vaccination, no case of new-onset type 1 diabetes after COVID-19 was described in an immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)-treated patient. Case Presentation: A 57-year-old male with stage IV NSCLC (brain and liver metastases) who had been treated with nivolumab for 4 years appeared positive for SARS-CoV-2 infection at a routine check. After two weeks, he was admitted to our clinic with severe fatigue, hyperglycemia, hyponatremia, and hyperkalemia. HbA1c level was normal and serum peptide C was undetectable. Nivolumab treatment was ceased, and the patient became fully dependent on basal–bolus insulin. After 3 months, the patient showed a complete imagistic remission. Conclusions: The case presented significant challenges due to the unclear etiology of newly onset diabetes and the uncommon age at which type 1 diabetes is developed. The outcome suggests that anti-PD-1 and SARS-CoV-2 infection can act synergistically. Full article

Glucocorticoids (GS) are widely used in multiple medical indications due to their anti-inflammatory, immunosuppressive, and antiproliferative effects. Despite their effectiveness in treating respiratory, skin, joint, renal, and neoplastic diseases, they dysregulate glucose metabolism, leading to steroid-induced diabetes (SID) or a significant increase of glycemia in people with previously diagnosed diabetes. The risk of adverse event development depends on the prior therapy, the duration of the treatment, the form of the drug, and individual factors, i.e., BMI, genetics, and age. Unfortunately, SID and steroid-induced hyperglycemia (SIH) are often overlooked, because the fasting blood glucose level, which is the most commonly used diagnostic test, is insufficient for excluding both conditions. The appropriate control of post-steroid hyperglycemia remains a major challenge in everyday clinical practice. Recently, the most frequently used antidiabetic strategies have been insulin therapy with isophane insulin or multiple injections in the basal–bolus regimen. Alternatively, in patients with lower glycemia, sulphonylureas or glinides were used. Taking into account the pathogenesis of post-steroid-induced hyperglycemia, the initiation of therapy with glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1) analogs and dipeptidyl peptidase 4 (DPP-4) inhibitors should be considered. In this article, we present a universal practical diagnostic algorithm of SID/SIH in patients requiring steroids, in both acute and chronic conditions, and we present a new pharmacotherapy algorithm taking into account the use of all currently available antidiabetic drugs. Full article

Background. One hundred years have passed since the discovery of insulin, which is one of the most relevant events of the 20th century. This period resulted in extraordinary progress in the development of novel molecules to improve glucose control, simplify the insulin regimen, and ameliorate the quality of life. In late March 2024, the first once-weekly basal analog Icodec was approved for diabetes mellitus, generating high expectations. Our aim was to systematically review and meta-analyze the efficacy and safety of Icodec compared to once-daily insulin analogs in type 1 (T1D) and type 2 diabetes (T2D). Methods. PubMed/MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched for randomized clinical trials (RCTs). Studies were included for the synthesis according to the following prespecified inclusion criteria: uncontrolled T1D or T2D, age ≥ 18 years, insulin Icodec vs. active comparators (Degludec U100, Glargine U100, Glargine U300, and Detemir), phase 3, multicenter, double-blind or open-label RCTs, and a study duration ≥ 24 weeks. Results. The systematic review included 4347 patients with T1D and T2D inadequately controlled (2172 randomized to Icodec vs. 2175 randomized to once-daily basal analogs). Icodec, compared to once-daily basal analogs, slightly reduced the levels of glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) with an estimated treatment difference (ETD) of −0.14% [95%CI −0.25; −0.03], p = 0.01, and I² 68%. Patients randomized to Icodec compared to those on once-daily basal analogs had a greater probability to achieve HbA1c < 7% without clinically relevant or severe hypoglycemic events in 12 weeks from randomization with an estimated risk ratio (ERR) of 1.17, [95%CI 1.01, 1.36], p = 0.03, and I² 66%. We did not find a difference in fasting glucose levels, time in range, and time above range between Icodec and comparators. Icodec, compared to once-daily basal analogs, resulted in a slight but statistically significant weight gain of 0.62 kg [95%CI 0.25; 0.99], p = 0.001, and I² 25%. The frequency of hypoglycemic events (ERR 1.16 [95%CI 0.95; 1.41]), adverse events (ERR 1.04 [95%CI 1.00; 1.08]), injection-site reactions (ERR 1.08 [95%CI 0.62; 1.90]), and the discontinuation of treatments were similar between the two groups. Icodec was found to work better when used in a basal-only than basal-bolus regimen with an ETD in HbA1c of −0.22%, a probability of achieving glucose control of +33%, a probability of achieving glucose control without clinically relevant or severe hypoglycemia of +28%, more time spent in target (+4.55%) and less time spent in hyperglycemia (−5.14%). The risk of clinically relevant or severe hypoglycemic events was significantly higher when background glinides and sulfonylureas were added to basal analogs (ERR 1.42 [95%CI 1.05; 1.93]). Conclusion. Insulin Icodec is substantially non-inferior to once-daily insulin analogs in T2D, either insulin-naïve or insulin-treated. However, Icodec works slightly better than competitors when used in a basal-only rather than basal-bolus regimen. Weight gain and hypoglycemic risk are substantially low but not negligible. Patients’ education, adequate lifestyle and pharmacological interventions, and appropriate therapy adjustments are essential to minimize risks. This systematic review is registered as PROSPERO CRD42024568680. Full article

Insulin pumps have transformed the way diabetes is managed by providing a more accurate and individualized method of delivering insulin, in contrast to conventional injection routines. This research explores the progression of insulin pumps, following their advancement from initial ideas to advanced contemporary systems. The report proceeds to categorize insulin pumps according to their delivery systems, specifically differentiating between conventional, patch, and implantable pumps. Every category is thoroughly examined, emphasizing its unique characteristics and capabilities. A comparative examination of commercially available pumps is provided to enhance informed decision making. This section provides a thorough analysis of important specifications among various brands and models. Considered factors include basal rate and bolus dosage capabilities, reservoir size, user interface, and compatibility with other diabetes care tools, such as continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) devices and so on. This review seeks to empower healthcare professionals and patients with the essential information to improve diabetes treatment via individualized pump therapy options. It provides a complete assessment of the development, categorization, and full specification comparisons of insulin pumps. Full article

Background: Successful conversion from insulin therapy to glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonist (GLP-1RA) with basal insulin in well-controlled patients has already been demonstrated. However, the data concerning individuals with poor glycaemic control are scarce. The aim of this work was to assess the success rate of insulin therapy to liraglutide transition in poorly controlled diabetes in a real-world clinical setting and to define predictors of success. We are the first to present the method of a fasting test as a way to identify the patients at higher risk of failure after treatment de-intensification. Methods: The retrospective observational study analyzed data of 62 poorly controlled obese diabetic patients on high-dose insulin therapy, who were subjected to a 72 h fasting test during hospitalization and subsequently switched to liraglutide ± basal insulin therapy. During the fasting, all antidiabetic treatment was discontinued. Patients were classified as responders if they remained on GLP-1RA treatment after 12 months. Non-responders restarted the basal-bolus insulin (BBI) regimen. Development of glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) and body weight in both groups, alongside with parameters associated with the higher risk of return to the BBI regimen, were analyzed. Results: A total of 71% of patients were switched successfully (=responders). Responders had more significant improvement in HbA1c (−6.4 ± 19.7 vs. −3.4 ± 22.9 mmol/mol) and weight loss (−4.6 ± 7.1 vs. −2.5 ± 4.0). Statistically significant difference between groups was found in initial HbA1c (75.6 ± 17.9 vs. 90.5 ± 23.6; p = 0.04), total daily dose of insulin (67.6 ± 36.4 vs. 90.8 ± 32.4; p = 0.02), and mean glycaemia during the fasting test (6.9 ± 1.7 vs. 8.6 ± 2.2 mmol/L; p < 0.01). Conclusions: This study confirms that therapy de-intensification in poorly controlled patients with a BBI regimen is possible. Higher baseline HbA1c, total daily insulin dose, and mean glucose during fasting test are negative predictive factors of successful therapy de-escalation. Full article

Background and Objectives: Degludec (Deg) and glargine U300 (Gla-300) are insulin analogs with longer and smoother pharmacodynamic action than glargine U100 (Gla-100), a long-acting insulin that has been widely used for many years in type 1 and type 2 diabetes. Both improve glycemic variability (GV) and the frequency of hypoglycemia, unlike Gla-100. However, it is unclear which insulin analog affects GV and hypoglycemia better in patients with insulin-dependent type 1 diabetes. We evaluated the effects of switching from Deg to Gla-300 on the day-to-day GV and the frequency of hypoglycemia in patients with insulin-dependent type 1 diabetes treated with Deg-containing basal-bolus insulin therapy (BBT). Materials and Methods: We conducted a retrospective study on 24 patients with insulin-dependent type 1 diabetes whose treatment was switched from Deg-containing BBT to Gla-300-containing BBT. We evaluated the day-to-day GV measured as the standard deviation of fasting blood glucose levels (SD-FBG) calculated by the self-monitoring of blood glucose records, the frequency of hypoglycemia (total, severe, and nocturnal), and blood glucose levels measured as fasting plasma glucose (FPG) levels and hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c). Results: The characteristics of the patients included in the analysis with high SD-FBG had frequent hypoglycemic events, despite the use of Deg-containing BBT. For this population, SD-FBG and the frequency of nocturnal hypoglycemia decreased after the switch from Deg to Gla-300. Despite the decrease in the frequency of nocturnal hypoglycemia, the FPG and HbA1c did not worsen by the switch. The change in the SD-FBG had a negative correlation with the SD-FBG at baseline and a positive correlation with serum albumin levels. Conclusions: Switching from Deg to Gla-300 improved the SD-FBG and decreased the frequency of nocturnal hypoglycemia in insulin-dependent type 1 diabetes treated with Deg-containing BBT, especially in cases with low serum albumin levels and a high GV. Full article

Background: Tirzepatide (TZP) is a once-weekly glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1) and glucose-dependent-insulinotropic-polypeptide (GIP) receptor co-agonist approved for T2D. TZP provides promising evidence in improving glucose control and weight loss in T2D and obesity across preclinical and human studies, including data from the SURPASS program. Aims: The goal of this paper was to review the evidence on TZP in terms of glucose control, body weight, and the progression of chronic diabetes-related complications and comorbidities. Results: The mean change in HbA1c ranged from −1.6% to −2.06% over placebo, from −0.29% to −0.92% over each GLP-1RAs, and from −0.7% to −1.09% over basal insulins. In SURPASS-6, TZP was more effective than insulin lispro U100 added to basal insulin in reducing HbA_1c levels at the study end (−2.1% vs. −1.1%, respectively). Compared to placebo, TZP induces a significant weight loss: 7.5 (5 mg/week); 11 (10 mg/week); and 12 kg (15 mg/week). Compared to GLP-1RAs, TZP reduces body weight from −1.68 kg to −7.16 kg depending on the dose (5 to 15 mg, respectively). Compared to basal insulin alone rigorously titrated, TZP added onto basal-insulin results in the best strategy for the composite endpoint of improvement of glucose control and weight loss. In SURPASS-6, TZP compared to insulin lispro U100 in add-on to insulin glargine U100 reduced body weight by 9 kg in mean (versus weight gain in basal-bolus users: +3.2 kg). TZP has pleiotropic effects potentially dampening the individual cardiovascular risk, including a reduction in systolic arterial pressure by 4 to 6 mmHg and total cholesterol by 4–6% compared to baseline. A post hoc analysis of SURPASS-4 revealed that TZP, compared to glargine U100, delayed the rate of glomerular filtration decline (−1.4 mL/min vs. −3.6 mL/min, respectively), reduced the rate of urinary albumin excretion (−6.8% vs. +36.9%, respectively), and was associated with a lower occurrence of the composite renal endpoint (HR 0.58 [0.43; 0.80]). Conclusions: Consistent evidence indicates that TZP dramatically changes the clinical course of T2D in different clinical scenarios. The efficacy and safety of TZP on chronic diabetes-related comorbidities and complications seem promising, but ongoing trials will clarify the real benefits. Full article

Background: This study aimed to compare whether a super bolus (SB) is a more efficient strategy than a normal bolus (NB) for high glycemic index (h-GI) meals in children with type 1 diabetes (T1D). Methods: A randomized, double-blind, crossover trial with an allocation ratio of 1:1, registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04019821). 72 children aged 10–18 years with T1D > 1 year, and on insulin pump therapy > 3 months were included. As an intervention, they ate a h-GI breakfast for the two following days and receive a prandial insulin bolus either in the form of SB or NB. Results: The SB group had lower glucose values during the observation time and lower glucose levels in 90th min (primary end point). The median time in range was also higher after SB. At the same time, more hypoglycemic episodes and a higher time below range were noted in this group. Almost 90% of them were the threshold value for initiating treatment for hypoglycemia and occurred near the end of observation period. More hyperglycemic episodes and over twice as much time in hyperglycemia were noted after NB. Conclusions: Super bolus is an effective strategy to avoid postprandial hyperglycemia but the basal insulin suspension should be longer to avoid hypoglycemia (f.ex. 3 h). Full article

Evidence about the impact of advanced hybrid closed loop (AHCL) on body mass index (BMI) and eating habits in children with type 1 diabetes (T1D) is lacking. This real-world study aimed at evaluating glycemic control, BMI, meals and basal/bolus distribution in young subjects with T1D treated by AHCL. Glycemic metrics, HbA1c, basal/bolus distribution, meals/day, BMI, total daily dose (TDD), and carbohydrates/kg (CHO/kg) have been evaluated in 83 subjects, aged 13 ± 4.5 years, in manual mode, 3 and 6 months after auto-mode. Time in range (TIR) increased after 3 months, exceeding the target of 70% and was maintained at 6 months. While coefficient of variation (CV) did not change, the glucose management indicator (GMI) decreased in auto-mode (6.7 ± 0.3 vs. 7.1 ± 0.5%; p < 0.001), as well as HbA1c. Basal proportion decreased in favor of boluses (38.3 ± 7.3 vs. 43.6 ± 10.9%; p < 0.001). Meals increased at 3 and 6 months (4.4 ± 1.2 vs. 5.0 ± 1.5, p 0.002 and 5.1 ± 1.7, p < 0.001), as well as TDD/kg, without changes in BMI and CHO consumed. No differences in meal composition have arisen from food diaries. In conclusion, AHCL ensured the achievement and maintenance of target TIR in young T1D subjects. The number of meals, TDD, and insulin bolus proportion increased over time, but BMI remained stable. Full article

Background: Patient adherence to insulin therapy is one of the major challenges during the treatment of diabetes mellitus. Considering the dearth of investigations, this study aimed to determine the adherence pattern and factors linked with nonadherence among diabetic patients using insulin in Al-Jouf region of Saudi Arabia. Methods: This cross-sectional study included diabetic patients using basal-bolus regimens, whether they had type 1 or type 2 diabetes. This study’s objective was determined using a validated data collection form that included sections on demographics, reasons for missed insulin doses, list of barriers to therapy, difficulties during insulin administration, and factors that may improve insulin inaction adherence. Results: Of 415 diabetic patients, 169 (40.7%) were reported to forget doses of insulin every week. The majority of these patients (38.5%) forget one or two doses. Away from home (36,1%), inability to adhere to the diet (24.3%) and embarrassment to administer injections in public (23.7%) were frequently cited as reasons for missing insulin doses. The occurrence of hypoglycemia (31%), weight gain (26%), and needle phobia (22%) were frequently cited as obstacles to insulin injection use. Preparing injections (18.3%), using insulin at bedtime (18.3%), and storing insulin at a cold temperature (18.1%) were the most challenging aspects of insulin use for patients. Reduction in the number of injections (30.8%) and convenient timing for insulin administration (29.6%) were frequently cited as factors that may improve participant adherence. Conclusions: This study revealed that the majority of diabetic patients forget to inject insulin, primarily as a result of travel. By identifying potential obstacles faced by patients, these findings direct health authorities to design and implement initiatives to increase insulin adherence among patients. Full article