Search Results (322)

In patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), antiplatelet therapy is the cornerstone of treatment for secondary prevention. Although dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) consisting of aspirin and a P2Y₁₂ inhibitor is the current standard of care, being, respectively, recommended for 6 and 12 months in patients with chronic and acute coronary syndrome without a need for oral anticoagulation, the continuous improvement in PCI technology and pharmacology have significantly reduced the need for long-term DAPT. Mounting evidence supports the administration of P2Y₁₂ inhibitor monotherapy, particularly ticagrelor, after a short period of DAPT following PCI as a strategy to reduce bleeding without a trade-off in ischemic events compared to standard DAPT. In addition, there is a growing literature supporting P2Y₁₂ inhibitor monotherapy also for long-term secondary prevention of ischemic events. However, the data to this extent are not as robust as compared to the first-year post-PCI period, with aspirin monotherapy still remaining the mainstay of treatment for most patients. This review aims to summarize the rationale for long-term antiplatelet therapy, the pharmacology of current antiplatelet drugs tested for long-term administration as monotherapy, and current evidence on the available comparisons between different long-term antiplatelet monotherapies in patients with CAD. Full article

Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is the leading cause of death worldwide, with pathophysiological mechanisms often involving platelet activation and chronic inflammation. While antiplatelet agents targeting adenosine diphosphate (ADP)-mediated pathways are well established in CVD management, less is known about drug interactions with the platelet-activating factor (PAF) pathway, a key mediator of inflammation. This study aimed to evaluate the effects of several commonly used cardiovascular and anti-inflammatory drug classes—including clopidogrel, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs), β-blockers, and analgesics—on platelet function via both the ADP and PAF pathways. Using human platelet-rich plasma (hPRP) from healthy donors, we assessed platelet aggregation in response to these two agonists in the absence and presence of graded concentrations of each of these drugs or of their usually prescribed combinations. The study identified differential drug effects on platelet aggregation, with some agents showing pathway-specific activity. Clopidogrel and NSAIDs demonstrated expected antiplatelet effects, while some (not all) antihypertensives exhibited additional anti-inflammatory potential. These findings highlight the relevance of evaluating pharmacological activity beyond traditional targets, particularly in relation to PAF-mediated inflammation and thrombosis. This dual-pathway analysis may contribute to a broader understanding of drug mechanisms and inform the development of more comprehensive therapeutic strategies for the prevention and treatment of cardiovascular, hypertension, and inflammation-driven diseases. Full article

Coronary microvascular obstruction and dysfunction (CMVO) frequently arise following primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), particularly in individuals with myocardial infarction. Despite the restoration of epicardial blood flow, microvascular perfusion might still be compromised, resulting in negative clinical outcomes. CMVO is a complex condition resulting from a combination of ischemia, distal thrombotic embolization, reperfusion injury, and individual susceptibilities such as inflammation and endothelial dysfunction. The pathophysiological features of this condition include microvascular spasm, endothelial swelling, capillary plugging by leukocytes and platelets, and oxidative stress. Traditional angiographic assessments, such as Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) flow grade and myocardial blush grade, have limited sensitivity. Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) stands as the gold standard for identifying CMVO, while the index of microvascular resistance (IMR) is a promising invasive option. Treatment approaches involve powerful antiplatelet drugs, anticoagulants, and supersaturated oxygen, yet no treatment has been definitively shown to reverse established CMVO. CMVO remains a significant therapeutic challenge in coronary artery disease management. Enhancing the comprehension of its core mechanisms is vital for the development of more effective and personalized treatment strategies. Full article

Beyond haemostasis and thrombosis, platelets are increasingly recognized for playing a crucial role in modulating immunoinflammation. Toll-like receptors (TLRs) constitute the first line of defence against infection and injury, with their engagement stimulating thrombotic and immune responses in platelets. Hence, anti-platelet drugs have been used to treat patients with infections and inflammation. However, due to the increased risk of bleeding with current anti-platelet drugs, alternative therapeutic targets need to be identified to ameliorate the consequences of inflammation-driven platelet hyperactivation. Previously, we demonstrated that resting platelets exhibit a metabolic plasticity that facilitates fuel selection flexibility, while in contrast, thrombin-stimulated platelets become highly glycolytic. Since multiple aspects of platelet activation require energy in terms of ATP, we investigated metabolic alterations in TLR1/TLR2-activated platelets. In this study, we have demonstrated that TLR1/TLR2-induced platelet activation reprogrammed platelets to upregulate glycolysis via CD36-linked mechanisms. In addition, we showed that this glycolytic flux is controlled by hexokinase (HK), which plays a crucial role in TLR1/TLR2-induced platelet aggregation. Targeting platelet metabolism plasticity may offer a novel strategy to inhibit platelet function in TLR-initiated diseases. Full article

The current management of patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and bleeding disorders, such as hemophilia, is supported by small retrospective studies or expert consensus documents. Moreover, people with hemophilia are less likely to receive invasive treatments like percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) or coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) for ACS compared to those without hemophilia, which could affect their cardiovascular outcomes. A multidisciplinary team with an expert hematologist is essential to properly define the therapeutic strategy, which should balance both the thrombotic and bleeding risks. We report a clinical case that illustrates an alternative revascularization strategy for hemophilic patients presenting with ACS and with a pattern of diffuse coronary atherosclerotic disease (CAD), encompassing drug-coated balloons (DCBs) in combination with spot stenting. The proposed approach might avoid a full-length drug-eluting stent (DES) implantation and also allow a short dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) regimen that is desirable in patients at a very high bleeding risk (HBR) like hemophiliacs. Furthermore, we have provided a review of the available literature on this topic and a focus on the main recommendations for managing ACS, in response to the presented clinical case. Finally, this article aims to share information and develop more confidence in the current guidelines on the treatment of hemophiliacs who need myocardial revascularization. Full article

Drug-coated balloons (DCBs) have emerged as a compelling alternative to drug-eluting stents in the treatment of coronary artery disease (CAD), offering the advantage of local drug delivery without permanent vascular scaffold implantation. Initially developed for managing in-stent restenosis, DCBs seem appealing for broader indications, particularly in small vessel disease and bifurcation lesions. While paclitaxel-based DCBs remain the most investigated, newer limus formulations are showing promise and appear to be a valid alternative in early trials. Evidence from recent randomized clinical trials (RCTs) and meta-analyses highlights DCBs as a safe and effective option in selected patients, with potential benefits including lower restenosis rates, reduced need for dual antiplatelet therapy, and avoidance of late stent-related complications. As new large-scale trials near completion, DCBs are poised to take on a broader role in the treatment of CAD, particularly in patients where “leaving nothing behind” offers a clinical advantage. This review offers an overview of the DCB platforms commercially available, showing pharmacological differences, providing current indications in practical guidelines, and analyzing the most recent and impactful RCTs and meta-analyses in the field. Full article

Cardiovascular disease remains a leading cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide, frequently arising from platelet hyperactivation and subsequent thrombus formation. Although conventional antiplatelet therapies are available, challenges, such as drug resistance and bleeding complications, require the development of novel agents. In this study, dihydrogeodin (DHG) was isolated from Fennellia flavipes and evaluated using platelets derived from Sprague–Dawley rats. Platelet aggregation induced by collagen, adenosine diphosphate, or thrombin was assessed by light transmission aggregometry; DHG significantly reduced aggregation in a dose-dependent manner. Further assays demonstrated that DHG suppressed intracellular calcium mobilization, adenosine triphosphate release, and integrin αIIbβ₃-dependent fibrinogen binding, thereby impairing clot retraction. Western blot analysis revealed that DHG reduced the phosphorylation of mitogen-activated protein kinases (ERK, JNK, p38) and PI3K/Akt, indicating inhibition across multiple platelet-signaling pathways. Additionally, SwissADME-assisted pharmacokinetics predicted favorable properties without violations of the Lipinski (Pfizer) filter, Muegge (Bayer) filter, Ghose filter, Veber filter, and Egan filter, and network pharmacology revealed inhibition of calcium and MAPK pathways. These results highlight the potential of DHG as a novel antiplatelet agent with broad-spectrum activity and promising drug-like characteristics. Further studies are warranted to assess its therapeutic window, safety profile, and potential for synergistic use with existing antiplatelet drugs. Full article

Introduction: A direct head-to-head comparison between potent P2Y12 inhibitors: prasugrel versus ticagrelor is still lacking. Purpose: In this single-center study, we sought to address the efficacy and safety of these two third-generation antiplatelet drugs, after about a decade of practical use. Methods: A retrospective observational study included all patients who were admitted with acute coronary syndrome between January 2010 and December 2019 and were discharged with aspirin and either prasugrel or ticagrelor after percutaneous coronary intervention. Patients were divided into two groups based on the dual antiplatelet drugs prescribed. Primary endpoint: A composite endpoint of cardiovascular death, recurrent coronary syndrome, or ischemic stroke at one year. Secondary endpoint: Significant bleeding according to the BARC classification (types 3, 4, or 5). Results: During this period, 746 patients met the inclusion criteria. The primary endpoint was reached in 70 patients (9.4%): 24 patients (8.0%) in the group treated with ticagrelor and 46 patients (10.3%) in the group treated with prasugrel (p-value = 0.303). In terms of safety events, significant bleeding was not statistically different between the ticagrelor and prasugrel groups: 13 (2.9%) vs. 9 (3%), respectively (p-value = 0.9). More patients discontinued their treatment before the end of the year among those treated with ticagrelor compared to those treated with prasugrel (16.7% vs. 9.6%, p-value = 0.003). Conclusions: There was no significant difference in the occurrence of recurrent cardiac events, stroke, or cardiovascular death, nor significant bleeding among ACS patients treated either with prasugrel or ticagrelor. Full article

Poor drug entrapment, burst release, and variable drug release profiles are the most critical challenges associated with biodegradable-polymer-based microspheres. In this study, biodegradable-polymer-based microspheres were used to entrap an antiplatelet drug, eptifibatide, using a single-emulsion solvent evaporation method. Critical challenges associated with biodegradable-polymer-based microspheres were addressed by incorporating different additives in the drug or polymer phase. Additives such as hydroxy propyl beta cyclodextrins (HPβCD), carboxy methyl cellulose sodium (Na CMC), and trehalose were added to the drug phase to evaluate their impact on the entrapment and stability of eptifibatide. The effect of the addition of additives such as polyvinyl alcohol (PVA), polyethylene glycol-400 (PEG-400), and methoxy polyethylene glycol phospholipid dimyristoyl phosphatidylethanolamine (mPEG-2000-DMPE, Na) to the polymer phase on the release profile of eptifibatide was evaluated. The inclusion of HPβCD resulted in good drug entrapment and helped control the initial unwanted burst release. Including Na CMC increased eptifibatide entrapment from 75% to 95%. Trehalose helped prevent the degradation of eptifibatide during lyophilization, and including PVA and PEG-400 reduced the lag phase and led to a controlled-release profile. Thus, including additives in the formulation can effectively improve the drug load and address issues associated with biodegradable-polymer-based microspheres. Full article

Bleeding complications are a significant concern in the management of acute coronary syndromes (ACS). The evidence from clinical trials demonstrates the need for balancing efficacy in reducing ischemic events with safety concerns, as bleeding events adversely affect prognosis and mortality. Pharmacological agents like aspirin, P2Y12 inhibitors (e.g., prasugrel, ticagrelor), glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors, and heparins are fundamental to ACS treatment but carry varying bleeding risks depending on individual patient profile. Recent advancements in risk stratification tools have enabled tailored approaches to dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT), optimizing its duration based on bleeding and thrombotic risks. Further Emerging therapies, including shortened DAPT protocols and P2Y12 inhibitor monotherapy, have shown promise in minimizing bleeding while maintaining clinical efficacy. The findings underscore the importance of personalized antithrombotic regimens in ACS management, emphasizing precise risk assessment to enhance outcomes and mitigate adverse events. This review examines the mechanisms, risk factors, and strategies to mitigate bleeding associated with anticoagulant and antiplatelet therapies in ACS. Full article

Antiplatelet and anticoagulation therapy are commonly used in the general population and sometimes in athletes experiencing cardiovascular disorders. In these cases, the treatment has to be tailored according to the individual bleeding and thrombotic risk profile, also considering the intrinsic risk of sports activities when advising athletes for eligibility for competitive sports. In athletes, it is necessary to pre-assess the individual bleeding risk, considering not only the personal bleeding risk (usually low in athletes) but also the type of sport the athlete would like to practice, with careful consideration in sports where traumatic collisions are highly likely. Additionally, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs are commonly used among athletes, and antiplatelet therapy may further increase the bleeding risk. Therefore, in selected competitive athletes, the default approach for antithrombotic therapy could be personalized. This review discusses the clinical management challenges of competitive athletes under antithrombotic or antiplatelet therapy, focusing on the intrinsic risks of sports practice and the indications for sports eligibility and disqualification. Full article

Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is the leading cause of mortality worldwide, often involving a strong genetic background. Polygenic risk scores (PRSs) combine the cumulative effects of multiple genetic variants to quantify an individual’s susceptibility to CVD. Pharmacogenomics (PGx) can further personalize treatment by tailoring medication choices to an individual’s genetic profile. Even with these potential benefits, the extent to which PRS can be integrated into the PGx of CVD remains unclear. Our review provides an overview of current evidence on the application of PRS in the PGx of CVD, examining clinical utility and limitations and providing directions for future research. Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews protocol, we conducted a comprehensive literature search in PubMed, EMBASE, and the Web of Science. Studies investigating the relationship between PRS in predicting the efficacy, adverse effects, or cost-effectiveness of cardiovascular medications were selected. Of the 1894 articles identified, 32 met the inclusion criteria. These studies predominantly examined lipid-lowering therapies, antihypertensives, and antiplatelets, although other medication classes (e.g., rate-control drugs, ibuprofen/acetaminophen, diuretics, and antiarrhythmics) were also included. Our findings showed that PRS is most robustly validated in lipid-lowering therapies, especially statins, where studies reported that individuals with higher PRSs derived the greatest reduction in lipids while on statins. Studies analyzing antihypertensives, antiplatelets, and antiarrhythmic medications demonstrated more variable outcomes, though certain PRSs did identify subgroups with significantly improved response rates or a higher risk of adverse events. Though PRS was a strong tool in many cases, we found some key limitations in its applicability in research, such as the under-representation of non-European-ancestry cohorts in the examined studies and a lack of standardized outcome reporting. In conclusion, though PRS offers promise in improving the efficacy of PGx of CVD by enhancing the personalization of medication on an individual level, several obstacles, such as the need for including a broader ancestral diversity and more robust cost-effectiveness data remain. Future research must (i) prioritize validating PRS in ethnically diverse populations, (ii) refine PRS derivation methods to tailor them for drug response phenotypes, and (iii) establish clear and attainable guidelines for standardizing the reporting of outcomes. Full article

Background and Objectives: The effects of COVID-19 disease can manifest and cause eye complications, one of which is diplopia. Diplopia is a medical condition that makes one object appear like two images. People may also experience diplopia after receiving the COVID-19 vaccine, after contracting COVID-19, or following a COVID-19 infection. Materials and Methods: This review aims to summarize the cases of COVID-19 that can cause diplopia and its treatment in the past 5 years. The literature search databases used for this review were PubMed and Scopus. The keywords used were “diplopia,” “COVID-19,” and “treatment.” Sixteen articles were reviewed after screening and applying the inclusion criteria. Results: The results show that over the past 5 years, cases of diplopia related to COVID-19 have occurred in America, Europe, Asia, and Africa. Most studies are case reports, and the total number of patients was 26, with an age range of 14 to 81. Conclusions: The diplopia cases recovered within 1 day to 8 months. Patients who experienced diplopia after receiving the COVID-19 vaccine, during COVID-19 infection, or after COVID-19 infection exhibited different symptoms. Nasopharyngeal swabs, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), computerized tomography (CT) scans, visual acuity tests, slit lamp biomicroscope examinations, eye movement tests, funduscopic examinations, and blood tests were the most commonly performed tests. Corticosteroids such as prednisone, methylprednisolone, and prednisolone were the most commonly used drugs to treat diplopia. In addition to corticosteroids, antibiotics, antivirals, antiplatelets, and vitamins were also given. An eye patch was considered to alleviate the diplopia. Full article

Background: Pharmacotherapy of chronic heart failure (CHF) with a reduced ejection fraction includes a combination of drugs. Often, different groups of drugs are added together for the treatment of concomitant conditions, such as statins, anticoagulants, antiplatelet agents, and cardiac glycosides, which have a narrow therapeutic window. Increased medication intake is a prerequisite for the increased risk of potential adverse drug–drug interactions (DDI), especially those occurring at the pharmacokinetic level. The main objectives of this study are to identify the most common potential pharmacokinetic drug–drug interactions (pPKDDIs), to explore more complex cases, and to simulate and analyze them with appropriate software. Methods: The data selected for the simulations were collected over a two-year period from January 2014 to December 2015. Identification of the pPKDDIs was carried out using Lexicomp Drug interaction, while simulations were performed with Simcyp software (V20, R1). Results: The most common pharmacokinetic mechanisms responsible for the occurrence of drug–drug interactions in the selected drugs with narrow therapeutic windows are those featuring the cytochrome isoforms CYP3A4 and 2C9 and the efflux pump—P-glycoprotein (P-gp). Simulations with the available data in Simcyp software showed possibilities to analyze and evaluate pPKDDIs, which would be difficult to assess without appropriate software, as well as ways to manage them. Conclusions: The frequency and complexity of pPKDDIs in patients with cardiovascular disease are high. Therefore, such patients require a specific approach to reduce these risks as well as to optimize the therapy. An appropriate PBPK software with the necessary database would be suitable in these cases. Full article

Most cardiological drugs need intravenous administration to have a fast effect in an emergency. Intravenous administration is linked to complications, such as tissue infiltration and thrombophlebitis. Aiming to supply an effective tool for the development of appropriate policies, this systematic review provides practical recommendations about the diluent, pH, osmolarity, dosage, vesicant properties, and phlebitis rate of the most commonly used cardiological drugs evaluated in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) till 31 August 2024. The authors searched for available IV cardiological drugs in RCTs in PUBMED EMBASE^®, EBSCO-CINAHL^®, and Cochrane Controlled Clinical trials. Drugs’ chemical features were obtained online, in drug data sheets, and in scientific papers, establishing that the drugs with a pH of <5 or >9, an osmolarity > 600 mOsm/L, and a high incidence of phlebitis reported in the literature, as well as vesicant drugs, require utmost caution during administration. A total of 857 papers were evaluated and 316 studies were included. A total of 84 cardiological drugs were identified, of which only 31 (37%) can be safely infused via a peripheral route. Thrombolytics and anticoagulants are considered the safest classes of drugs, with only one drug flagged as a “red flag” medication. However, a higher percentage of drugs in other categories meet the “red flag” criteria, including antiarrhythmics (52%), antiplatelet agents (67%), diuretics (67%), antihypertensives (70%), other drugs (77%), and vasoconstrictors and inotropics (89%). Understanding the physicochemical properties of cardiological drugs is essential for significantly improving patient safety and preventing administration errors and local side effects. Full article