Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (19)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = TRL of hydrogen technologies

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
24 pages, 1893 KiB  
Article
Scoring and Ranking Methods for Evaluating the Techno-Economic Competitiveness of Hydrogen Production Technologies
by Yehia F. Khalil
Sustainability 2025, 17(13), 5770; https://doi.org/10.3390/su17135770 - 23 Jun 2025
Viewed by 444
Abstract
This research evaluates four hydrogen (H2) production technologies via water electrolysis (WE): alkaline water electrolysis (AWE), proton exchange membrane electrolysis (PEME), anion exchange membrane electrolysis (AEME), and solid oxide electrolysis (SOE). Two scoring and ranking methods, the MACBETH method and the [...] Read more.
This research evaluates four hydrogen (H2) production technologies via water electrolysis (WE): alkaline water electrolysis (AWE), proton exchange membrane electrolysis (PEME), anion exchange membrane electrolysis (AEME), and solid oxide electrolysis (SOE). Two scoring and ranking methods, the MACBETH method and the Pugh decision matrix, are utilized for this evaluation. The scoring process employs nine decision criteria: capital expenditure (CAPEX), operating expenditure (OPEX), operating efficiency (SOE), startup time (SuT), environmental impact (EI), technology readiness level (TRL), maintenance requirements (MRs), supply chain challenges (SCCs), and levelized cost of H2 (LCOH). The MACBETH method involves pairwise technology comparisons for each decision criterion using seven qualitative judgment categories, which are converted into quantitative scores via M-MACBETH software (Version 3.2.0). The Pugh decision matrix benchmarks WE technologies using a baseline technology—SMR with CCS—and a three-point scoring scale (0 for the baseline, +1 for better, −1 for worse). Results from both methods indicate AWE as the leading H2 production technology, which is followed by AEME, PEME, and SOE. AWE excels due to its lowest CAPEX and OPEX, highest TRL, and optimal operational efficiency (at ≈7 bars of pressure), which minimizes LCOH. AEME demonstrates balanced performance across the criteria. While PEME shows advantages in some areas, it requires improvements in others. SOE has the most areas needing enhancement. These insights can direct future R&D efforts toward the most promising H2 production technologies to achieve the net-zero goal. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Transitioning to Sustainable Energy: Opportunities and Challenges)
Show Figures

Figure 1

34 pages, 13658 KiB  
Project Report
Clean Propulsion Technologies: Securing Technological Dominance for the Finnish Marine and Off-Road Powertrain Sectors
by Maciej Mikulski, Teemu Ovaska, Rodrigo Rabetino, Merja Kangasjärvi and Aino Myllykangas
Energies 2025, 18(5), 1240; https://doi.org/10.3390/en18051240 - 3 Mar 2025
Viewed by 822
Abstract
The Clean Propulsion Technologies (CPT) project, established in 2021, brought together 15 research partners and original equipment manufacturers. The goal was to create a common vision and sustainable business solutions so that the worldwide technological leadership of the Finnish powertrain industry is secured. [...] Read more.
The Clean Propulsion Technologies (CPT) project, established in 2021, brought together 15 research partners and original equipment manufacturers. The goal was to create a common vision and sustainable business solutions so that the worldwide technological leadership of the Finnish powertrain industry is secured. With a EUR 15.5 M budget, CPT brought early-stage innovative concepts towards technology readiness level (TRL) 6. The project’s particular significance was its unique cross-coupling of marine and off-road sectors, which have similar emission reduction targets but which do not compete for similar customers. The project yielded 21 innovative solutions, from accelerated model-based design methodologies and progress in combustion and aftertreatment control to hybrid energy management solutions. These were encapsulated in four ground-breaking demonstrations, including a next-generation marine engine working in low-temperature, reactivity-controlled compression ignition (RCCI) mode and a hydrogen off-road engine. An advanced close-coupled selective catalyst reduction (SCR) system and a hybrid wheel-platform with digital hydraulics were also demonstrated. The University of Vaasa led the consortium and was responsible for coordinated model-based rapid prototyping. This report examines University of Vaasa’s achievements during the CPT in terms of 26 milestones, 13 deliverables, and 32 research papers. It focuses also on other aspects, including lessons learned from managing large-scale academic–industry research. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

24 pages, 4674 KiB  
Article
Valorisation of Red Mud: Disclosing the Potential of an Abundant Residue
by Carlos A. Vielma, Adela Svobodova-Sedlackova, Josep Maria Chimenos, Ana Inés Fernández, Carlos Berlanga, Rafael Rodriguez and Camila Barreneche
Sustainability 2025, 17(5), 1849; https://doi.org/10.3390/su17051849 - 21 Feb 2025
Viewed by 1010
Abstract
Red mud (RM), the primary waste product of the aluminium industry, is notable for its high concentrations of metals and rare earth elements (REE). Efforts have been made to develop extraction methods for REE recovery from RM, aiming to enhance its valorisation and [...] Read more.
Red mud (RM), the primary waste product of the aluminium industry, is notable for its high concentrations of metals and rare earth elements (REE). Efforts have been made to develop extraction methods for REE recovery from RM, aiming to enhance its valorisation and reduce the European reliance on external REE sources—particularly crucial for technological advancements and the transition to renewable energy. However, these methods have only been limited to low technology readiness levels (TRLs), with no economically or technically viable processing routes yet defined to enable large-scale industrialisation within a circular economy model. This study characterised RM samples from the Seydişehir region in Türkiye using different techniques and explored the experimental process for recovering metals and REE. Moreover, the study assessed the global prospective potential of RM based on technical and economic data, as well as the sustainability of the implemented process through the life cycle assessment (LCA) tool. Results showed a total REE concentration of up to 1600 ppm, with Ce, being the most abundant (426 ± 27 ppm), followed by La, Nd, and Sc. Concentration efficiencies for La and Nd ranged between 240–300%. Sc, Y, Ce, La, and Nd have significant usage in European markets and represent prime RM targets for further prospecting. The LCA revealed that the highest global warming potential of the sequential extraction process was attributed to hydroxylamine hydrochloride and hydrogen peroxide. The findings highlight the need to explore alternative, more eco-friendly reagents to improve RM valorisation. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Waste and Recycling)
Show Figures

Figure 1

20 pages, 655 KiB  
Article
A Comparative Science-Based Viability Assessment Among Current and Emerging Hydrogen Production Technologies
by Yehia F. Khalil
Appl. Sci. 2025, 15(2), 497; https://doi.org/10.3390/app15020497 - 7 Jan 2025
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 1340
Abstract
This research undertakes a comparative analysis of current and emerging hydrogen (H2) production technologies, evaluating them based on quantitative and qualitative decision criteria. The quantitative criteria include cost of H2 production (USD/kg H2), energy consumption (MJ/kg H2 [...] Read more.
This research undertakes a comparative analysis of current and emerging hydrogen (H2) production technologies, evaluating them based on quantitative and qualitative decision criteria. The quantitative criteria include cost of H2 production (USD/kg H2), energy consumption (MJ/kg H2), global warming potential (kg CO2-eq/kg H2), and technology energy efficiency (%). The qualitative criteria encompass technology readiness level (TRL) and availability of supply chain materials (classified as low, medium, or high). To achieve these objectives, an extensive literature review has been conducted, systematically assessing the selected H2 production technologies against the aforementioned criteria. The insights synthesized from the literature provide a foundation for an informed, science-based evaluation of the potentials and techno-economic challenges that these technologies face in achieving the 1-1-1 goal set by the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) in 2021. This target aims for a H2 production cost of USD 1/kg H2 within one decade (by 2031), including costs associated with production, delivery, and dispensing at H2 fueling stations (HRSs). Also, the DOE established an interim goal of USD 2/kg H2 by 2026. This research concludes that among the examined H2 production technologies, water electrolysis and biomass waste valorization emerge as the most promising near-term solutions to meet the DOE’s goal. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

15 pages, 7220 KiB  
Systematic Review
Prospective Life Cycle Assessment of Hydrogen: A Systematic Review of Methodological Choices
by Gustavo Ezequiel Martinez, Roel Degens, Gabriela Espadas-Aldana, Daniele Costa and Giuseppe Cardellini
Energies 2024, 17(17), 4297; https://doi.org/10.3390/en17174297 - 28 Aug 2024
Cited by 3 | Viewed by 2217
Abstract
This systematic review examines methodological choices in assessing hydrogen production and utilisation technologies using prospective life cycle assessments (LCA) between 2010 and 2022, following PRISMA guidelines. The review analysed 32 peer-reviewed articles identified through Scopus, Web of Science, and BASE. The study reveals [...] Read more.
This systematic review examines methodological choices in assessing hydrogen production and utilisation technologies using prospective life cycle assessments (LCA) between 2010 and 2022, following PRISMA guidelines. The review analysed 32 peer-reviewed articles identified through Scopus, Web of Science, and BASE. The study reveals a significant gap in the consistent application of prospective LCA methodologies for emerging hydrogen technologies. Most studies employed attributional approaches, often lacking prospective elements in life cycle inventory (LCI) modelling. Although some initiatives to integrate forward-looking components were noted, there was often lack of clarity in defining LCA objectives, technology readiness level (TRL), and upscaling methods. Of the 22 studies that focused on emerging hydrogen technologies, few detailed upscaling methods. Additionally, the review identified common issues, such as the limited use of prospective life cycle impact assessment (LCIA) methods, inadequate data quality evaluation, and insufficient sensitivity and uncertainty analysis. These findings highlight the substantial gaps in modelling low-TRL hydrogen technologies and the need for more robust, comprehensive approaches to assess uncertainties. The review also identified common practices and areas for improvement to enhance the reliability and relevance of hydrogen technology environmental assessments. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section B: Energy and Environment)
Show Figures

Figure 1

20 pages, 3460 KiB  
Article
Hydroprocessing Microbial Oils for Advanced Road Transportation, Aviation, and Maritime Drop-In Fuels: Industrially Relevant Scale Validation
by Athanasios Dimitriadis, Loukia P. Chrysikou, Ioanna Kosma, Nikos Tourlakidis and Stella Bezergianni
Energies 2024, 17(15), 3854; https://doi.org/10.3390/en17153854 - 5 Aug 2024
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1540
Abstract
Triacylglycerides (TAGs) produced via the syngas fermentation of biogenic residues and wastes were evaluated as a potential feedstock for advanced road transportation, aviation, and maritime drop-in fuels via hydroprocessing technology. Due to the limited availability of TAGs, a simulated feedstock (SM TAGs) was [...] Read more.
Triacylglycerides (TAGs) produced via the syngas fermentation of biogenic residues and wastes were evaluated as a potential feedstock for advanced road transportation, aviation, and maritime drop-in fuels via hydroprocessing technology. Due to the limited availability of TAGs, a simulated feedstock (SM TAGs) was utilized by blending various commercial oils, simulating the fatty acid composition of TAGs. At first, the simulated feedstock and the real TAGs were hydrotreated on a TRL 4 (technology readiness level) pilot plant to evaluate the potential of the SM feedstock to simulate the TAGs based on product quality. The hydrotreatment technology was evaluated and optimized on a TRL 4 plant. The research was further extended to a TRL 5 hydrotreatment plant with the optimum operating window for scaling up the technology. The resulting product was fractionated on a batch fractionation unit under vacuum to separate the jet and diesel fractions. The produced fuels were analyzed and evaluated based on the aviation Jet A1, EN590, EN15940, and marine diesel DMA specifications. The results show that the TAG composition was successfully simulated via a blend of vegetable oils. In addition, the hydrotreatment of the real TAGs and simulated feedstock resulted in similar-quality liquid products. The technology was successfully scaled up on a TRL 5 unit, leading to advanced, high-quality aviation and diesel drop-in fuels from TAGs, while the reaction pathways of hydrotreating can be controlled via the operating parameters of pressure, temperature, and H2/oil ratio. The hydrotreatment process’s optimum conditions were 13.8 MPa pressure, 643 K temperature, 1 h−1 liquid hourly space velocity (LHSV), and 5000 scfb hydrogen-to-oil ratio. Finally, a storage stability study of the hydrotreated liquid product showed that it can be stored for more than 6 months at ambient conditions without any noticeable changes to its properties. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Renewable Fuels for Internal Combustion Engines: 2nd Edition)
Show Figures

Figure 1

31 pages, 2325 KiB  
Review
Comparing CO2 Storage and Utilization: Enhancing Sustainability through Renewable Energy Integration
by Jose Antonio Garcia, Maria Villen-Guzman, Jose Miguel Rodriguez-Maroto and Juan Manuel Paz-Garcia
Sustainability 2024, 16(15), 6639; https://doi.org/10.3390/su16156639 - 3 Aug 2024
Cited by 9 | Viewed by 4311
Abstract
Addressing the environmental challenges posed by CO2 emissions is crucial for mitigating global warming and achieving net-zero emissions by 2050. This study compares CO2 storage (CCS) and utilization (CCU) technologies, highlighting the benefits of integrating captured CO2 into fuel production. [...] Read more.
Addressing the environmental challenges posed by CO2 emissions is crucial for mitigating global warming and achieving net-zero emissions by 2050. This study compares CO2 storage (CCS) and utilization (CCU) technologies, highlighting the benefits of integrating captured CO2 into fuel production. This paper focuses on various carbon utilization routes such as Power-to-Gas via the Sabatier reaction, indirect production of DME, and Power-to-Fuel technologies. The maturity of these technologies is evaluated using the Technology Readiness Level (TRL) method, identifying the advancements needed for future implementation. Additionally, global regulations and policies surrounding carbon capture and storage are reviewed to provide context for their current status. The study emphasizes the potential of CCU technologies to reduce future CO2 emissions by converting captured CO2 into valuable fuels and chemicals, thus supporting the transition to a sustainable energy system. The findings indicate that while CCS technologies are more mature, promising CCU technologies can significantly contribute to reducing greenhouse gas emissions if green hydrogen becomes more affordable. This research underscores the importance of further technological development and economic evaluation to enhance the feasibility and adoption of CCU technologies in the pursuit of long-term environmental sustainability. Full article
(This article belongs to the Topic CO2 Capture and Renewable Energy)
Show Figures

Figure 1

24 pages, 2877 KiB  
Article
Hydrogen from Depleted/Depleting Hydrocarbon Reservoirs: A Reservoir Engineering Perspective
by Hakan Alkan, Johannes Fabian Bauer, Oleksandr Burachok, Patrick Kowollik, Michael Olbricht and Mohd Amro
Appl. Sci. 2024, 14(14), 6217; https://doi.org/10.3390/app14146217 - 17 Jul 2024
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 2578
Abstract
In today’s industry, H2 is mostly produced from fossil fuels such as natural gas (NG), oil, and coal through various processes. However, all these processes produce both carbon dioxide (CO2) as well as H2, making them questionable in [...] Read more.
In today’s industry, H2 is mostly produced from fossil fuels such as natural gas (NG), oil, and coal through various processes. However, all these processes produce both carbon dioxide (CO2) as well as H2, making them questionable in terms of climate change mitigation efforts. In addition to efforts to increase the conversion efficiency of green H2 technologies, work is also underway to make H2 production from fossil fuels more environmentally friendly by reducing/avoiding CO2 emissions. In this framework, these technologies are combined with geologic carbon storage. In a further step, the use of depleted hydrocarbon reservoirs for in situ H2 production is being investigated, with the co-generated CO2 remaining permanently in the reservoir. The objective of this paper is to provide a brief overview of the technologies that can be used to produce H2 from depleted and depleting hydrocarbon reservoirs (DHRs) in various ways. We evaluate the required processes from a reservoir engineering perspective, highlighting their potential for H2 generation and their technology readiness level (TRL) for applications. We also investigate the possibility of permanently storing the co-produced CO2 in the reservoir as a means of mitigating emissions. In addition, we provide a preliminary cost analysis to compare these methods with conventional hydrogen production techniques, as well as an assessment of operational risks and associated cost estimates. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Reservoir Engineering)
Show Figures

Figure 1

16 pages, 6775 KiB  
Communication
Instances of Safety-Related Advances in Hydrogen as Regards Its Gaseous Transport and Buffer Storage and Its Solid-State Storage
by Farida Lamari, Benno Weinberger, Patrick Langlois and Daniel Fruchart
Hydrogen 2024, 5(3), 387-402; https://doi.org/10.3390/hydrogen5030022 - 4 Jul 2024
Cited by 4 | Viewed by 1971
Abstract
As part of the ongoing transition from fossil fuels to renewable energies, advances are particularly expected in terms of safe and cost-effective solutions. Publicising instances of such advances and emphasising global safety considerations constitute the rationale for this communication. Knowing that high-strength steels [...] Read more.
As part of the ongoing transition from fossil fuels to renewable energies, advances are particularly expected in terms of safe and cost-effective solutions. Publicising instances of such advances and emphasising global safety considerations constitute the rationale for this communication. Knowing that high-strength steels can prove economically relevant in the foreseeable future for transporting hydrogen in pipelines by limiting the pipe wall thickness required to withstand high pressure, one advance relates to a bench designed to assess the safe transport or renewable-energy-related buffer storage of hydrogen gas. That bench has been implemented at the technology readiness level TRL 6 to test initially intact, damaged, or pre-notched 500 mm-long pipe sections with nominal diameters ranging from 300 to 900 mm in order to appropriately validate or question the use of reputedly satisfactory predictive models in terms of hydrogen embrittlement and potential corollary failure. The other advance discussed herein relates to the reactivation of a previously fruitful applied research into safe mass solid-state hydrogen storage by magnesium hydride through a new public–private partnership. This latest development comes at a time when markets have started driving the hydrogen economy, bearing in mind that phase-change materials make it possible to level out heat transfers during the absorption/melting and solidification/desorption cycles and to attain an overall energy efficiency of up to 80% for MgH2-based compacts doped with expanded natural graphite. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

18 pages, 2358 KiB  
Article
Automotive e-Fuels via Hydrocracking of FT-Wax: e-Gasoline and e-Diesel Production
by Athanasios Dimitriadis, Loukia P. Chrysikou and Stella Bezergianni
Energies 2024, 17(11), 2756; https://doi.org/10.3390/en17112756 - 5 Jun 2024
Cited by 3 | Viewed by 2112
Abstract
The main goal of this research is the production of e-fuels in gasoline- and diesel-range hydrocarbons via the hydrocracking of wax from Fischer–Tropsch (FT-wax) synthesis. The hydrogen for the hydrocracking process originated from solar energy via water electrolysis, thus, the produced fuels were [...] Read more.
The main goal of this research is the production of e-fuels in gasoline- and diesel-range hydrocarbons via the hydrocracking of wax from Fischer–Tropsch (FT-wax) synthesis. The hydrogen for the hydrocracking process originated from solar energy via water electrolysis, thus, the produced fuels were called e-fuels. The FT-wax was produced via the Fischer–Tropsch synthesis of syngas stream from the chemical looping gasification (CLG) of biogenic residues. For the hydrocracking tests, a continuous-operation TRL3 (Technology Readiness Level) pilot plant was utilized. At first, hydrocracking catalyst screening was performed for the upgrading of the FT-wax. Three hydrocracking catalysts were investigated (Ni-W, Ni-W zeolite-supported, and Ni-W Al2O3-supported catalyst) via various operating conditions to identify the optimal operating window for each one. These three catalysts were selected, as they are typical catalysts that are used in the petroleum refinery industry. The optimal catalyst was found to be the NiW catalyst, as it led to high e-fuel yields (38 wt% e-gasoline and 47 wt% e-diesel) with an average hydrogen consumption. The optimum operating window was found at a 603 K reactor temperature, 8.3 MPa system pressure, 1 hr−1 LHSV, and 2500 scfb H2/oil ratio. In the next phase, the production of 5 L of hydrocracked wax was performed utilizing the optimum NiW catalyst and the optimal operating parameters. The liquid product was further fractionated to separate the fractions of e-gasoline, e-diesel, and e-heavy fuel. The e-gasoline and e-diesel fractions were qualitatively assessed, indicating that they fulfilled almost all EN 228 and EN 590 for petroleum-based gasoline and diesel, respectively. Furthermore, a 12-month storage study showed that the product can be stored for a period of 4 months in ambient conditions. In general, green transportation e-fuels with favorable properties that met most of the fossil fuels specifications were produced successfully from the hydrocracking of FT-wax. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Renewable Fuels for Internal Combustion Engines: 2nd Edition)
Show Figures

Figure 1

74 pages, 9961 KiB  
Review
Hydrogen-Based Energy Systems: Current Technology Development Status, Opportunities and Challenges
by Inês Rolo, Vítor A. F. Costa and Francisco P. Brito
Energies 2024, 17(1), 180; https://doi.org/10.3390/en17010180 - 28 Dec 2023
Cited by 77 | Viewed by 10671
Abstract
The use of hydrogen as an energy carrier within the scope of the decarbonisation of the world’s energy production and utilisation is seen by many as an integral part of this endeavour. However, the discussion around hydrogen technologies often lacks some perspective on [...] Read more.
The use of hydrogen as an energy carrier within the scope of the decarbonisation of the world’s energy production and utilisation is seen by many as an integral part of this endeavour. However, the discussion around hydrogen technologies often lacks some perspective on the currently available technologies, their Technology Readiness Level (TRL), scope of application, and important performance parameters, such as energy density or conversion efficiency. This makes it difficult for the policy makers and investors to evaluate the technologies that are most promising. The present study aims to provide help in this respect by assessing the available technologies in which hydrogen is used as an energy carrier, including its main challenges, needs and opportunities in a scenario in which fossil fuels still dominate global energy sources but in which renewables are expected to assume a progressively vital role in the future. The production of green hydrogen using water electrolysis technologies is described in detail. Various methods of hydrogen storage are referred, including underground storage, physical storage, and material-based storage. Hydrogen transportation technologies are examined, taking into account different storage methods, volume requirements, and transportation distances. Lastly, an assessment of well-known technologies for harnessing energy from hydrogen is undertaken, including gas turbines, reciprocating internal combustion engines, and fuel cells. It seems that the many of the technologies assessed have already achieved a satisfactory degree of development, such as several solutions for high-pressure hydrogen storage, while others still require some maturation, such as the still limited life and/or excessive cost of the various fuel cell technologies, or the suitable operation of gas turbines and reciprocating internal combustion engines operating with hydrogen. Costs below 200 USD/kWproduced, lives above 50 kh, and conversion efficiencies approaching 80% are being aimed at green hydrogen production or electricity production from hydrogen fuel cells. Nonetheless, notable advances have been achieved in these technologies in recent years. For instance, electrolysis with solid oxide cells may now sometimes reach up to 85% efficiency although with a life still in the range of 20 kh. Conversely, proton exchange membrane fuel cells (PEMFCs) working as electrolysers are able to sometimes achieve a life in the range of 80 kh with efficiencies up to 68%. Regarding electricity production from hydrogen, the maximum efficiencies are slightly lower (72% and 55%, respectively). The combination of the energy losses due to hydrogen production, compression, storage and electricity production yields overall efficiencies that could be as low as 25%, although smart applications, such as those that can use available process or waste heat, could substantially improve the overall energy efficiency figures. Despite the challenges, the foreseeable future seems to hold significant potential for hydrogen as a clean energy carrier, as the demand for hydrogen continues to grow, particularly in transportation, building heating, and power generation, new business prospects emerge. However, this should be done with careful regard to the fact that many of these technologies still need to increase their technological readiness level before they become viable options. For this, an emphasis needs to be put on research, innovation, and collaboration among industry, academia, and policymakers to unlock the full potential of hydrogen as an energy vector in the sustainable economy. Full article
(This article belongs to the Collection Hydrogen Energy Reviews)
Show Figures

Figure 1

29 pages, 5672 KiB  
Review
Green Hydrogen: Resources Consumption, Technological Maturity, and Regulatory Framework
by Jesús Rey, Francisca Segura and José Manuel Andújar
Energies 2023, 16(17), 6222; https://doi.org/10.3390/en16176222 - 27 Aug 2023
Cited by 25 | Viewed by 4896
Abstract
Current climate crisis makes the need for reducing carbon emissions more than evident. For this reason, renewable energy sources are expected to play a fundamental role. However, these sources are not controllable, but depend on the weather conditions. Therefore, green hydrogen (hydrogen produced [...] Read more.
Current climate crisis makes the need for reducing carbon emissions more than evident. For this reason, renewable energy sources are expected to play a fundamental role. However, these sources are not controllable, but depend on the weather conditions. Therefore, green hydrogen (hydrogen produced from water electrolysis using renewable energies) is emerging as the key energy carrier to solve this problem. Although different properties of hydrogen have been widely studied, some key aspects such as the water and energy footprint, as well as the technological development and the regulatory framework of green hydrogen in different parts of the world have not been analysed in depth. This work performs a data-driven analysis of these three pillars: water and energy footprint, technological maturity, and regulatory framework of green hydrogen technology. Results will allow the evaluation of green hydrogen deployment, both the current situation and expectations. Regarding the water footprint, this is lower than that of other fossil fuels and competitive with other types of hydrogen, while the energy footprint is higher than that of other fuels. Additionally, results show that technological and regulatory framework for hydrogen is not fully developed and there is a great inequality in green hydrogen legislation in different regions of the world. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section A5: Hydrogen Energy)
Show Figures

Figure 1

13 pages, 2743 KiB  
Perspective
Challenges of Industrial-Scale Testing Infrastructure for Green Hydrogen Technologies
by Jonas Bollmann, Sudhagar Pitchaimuthu and Moritz F. Kühnel
Energies 2023, 16(8), 3604; https://doi.org/10.3390/en16083604 - 21 Apr 2023
Cited by 15 | Viewed by 4708
Abstract
Green hydrogen is set to become the energy carrier of the future, provided that production technologies such as electrolysis and solar water splitting can be scaled to global dimensions. Testing these hydrogen technologies on the MW scale requires the development of dedicated new [...] Read more.
Green hydrogen is set to become the energy carrier of the future, provided that production technologies such as electrolysis and solar water splitting can be scaled to global dimensions. Testing these hydrogen technologies on the MW scale requires the development of dedicated new test facilities for which there is no precedent. This perspective highlights the challenges to be met on the path to implementing a test facility for large-scale water electrolysis, photoelectrochemical and photocatalytic water splitting and aims to serve as a much-needed blueprint for future test facilities based on the authors’ own experience in establishing the Hydrogen Lab Leuna. Key aspects to be considered are the electricity and utility requirements of the devices under testing, the analysis of the produced H2 and O2 and the safety regulations for handling large quantities of H2. Choosing the right location is crucial not only for meeting these device requirements, but also for improving financial viability through supplying affordable electricity and providing a remunerated H2 sink to offset the testing costs. Due to their lower TRL and requirement for a light source, large-scale photocatalysis and photoelectrochemistry testing are less developed and the requirements are currently less predictable. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section A5: Hydrogen Energy)
Show Figures

Figure 1

17 pages, 2942 KiB  
Review
Review of Thermochemical Technologies for Water and Energy Integration Systems: Energy Storage and Recovery
by Miguel Castro Oliveira, Muriel Iten and Henrique A. Matos
Sustainability 2022, 14(12), 7506; https://doi.org/10.3390/su14127506 - 20 Jun 2022
Cited by 8 | Viewed by 4575
Abstract
Thermochemical technologies (TCT) enable the promotion of the sustainability and the operation of energy systems, as well as in industrial sites. The thermochemical operations can be applied for energy storage and energy recovery (alternative fuel production from water/wastewater, in particular green hydrogen). TCTs [...] Read more.
Thermochemical technologies (TCT) enable the promotion of the sustainability and the operation of energy systems, as well as in industrial sites. The thermochemical operations can be applied for energy storage and energy recovery (alternative fuel production from water/wastewater, in particular green hydrogen). TCTs are proven to have a higher energy density and long-term storage compared to standard thermal storage technologies (sensible and latent). Nonetheless, these require further research on their development for the increasing of the technology readiness level (TRL). Since TCTs operate with the same input/outputs streams as other thermal storages (for instance, wastewater and waste heat streams), these may be conceptually analyzed in terms of the integration in Water and Energy Integration System (WEIS). This work is set to review the techno-economic and environmental aspects related to thermochemical energy storage (sorption and reaction-based) and wastewater-to-energy (particular focus on thermochemical water splitting technology), aiming also to assess their potential into WEIS. The exploited technologies are, in general, proved to be suitable to be installed within the conceptualization of WEIS. In the case of TCES technologies, these are proven to be significantly more potential analogues to standard TES technologies on the scope of the conceptualization of WEIS. In the case of energy recovery technologies, although a conceptualization of a pathway to produce usable heat with an input of wastewater, further study has to be performed to fully understand the use of additional fuel in combustion-based processes. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

32 pages, 92593 KiB  
Article
A Comparison of Alternative Fuels for Shipping in Terms of Lifecycle Energy and Cost
by Li Chin Law, Beatrice Foscoli, Epaminondas Mastorakos and Stephen Evans
Energies 2021, 14(24), 8502; https://doi.org/10.3390/en14248502 - 16 Dec 2021
Cited by 76 | Viewed by 16662
Abstract
Decarbonization of the shipping sector is inevitable and can be made by transitioning into low- or zero-carbon marine fuels. This paper reviews 22 potential pathways, including conventional Heavy Fuel Oil (HFO) marine fuel as a reference case, “blue” alternative fuel produced from natural [...] Read more.
Decarbonization of the shipping sector is inevitable and can be made by transitioning into low- or zero-carbon marine fuels. This paper reviews 22 potential pathways, including conventional Heavy Fuel Oil (HFO) marine fuel as a reference case, “blue” alternative fuel produced from natural gas, and “green” fuels produced from biomass and solar energy. Carbon capture technology (CCS) is installed for fossil fuels (HFO and liquefied natural gas (LNG)). The pathways are compared in terms of quantifiable parameters including (i) fuel mass, (ii) fuel volume, (iii) life cycle (Well-To-Wake—WTW) energy intensity, (iv) WTW cost, (v) WTW greenhouse gas (GHG) emission, and (vi) non-GHG emissions, estimated from the literature and ASPEN HYSYS modelling. From an energy perspective, renewable electricity with battery technology is the most efficient route, albeit still impractical for long-distance shipping due to the low energy density of today’s batteries. The next best is fossil fuels with CCS (assuming 90% removal efficiency), which also happens to be the lowest cost solution, although the long-term storage and utilization of CO2 are still unresolved. Biofuels offer a good compromise in terms of cost, availability, and technology readiness level (TRL); however, the non-GHG emissions are not eliminated. Hydrogen and ammonia are among the worst in terms of overall energy and cost needed and may also need NOx clean-up measures. Methanol from LNG needs CCS for decarbonization, while methanol from biomass does not, and also seems to be a good candidate in terms of energy, financial cost, and TRL. The present analysis consistently compares the various options and is useful for stakeholders involved in shipping decarbonization. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Energy-Saving and Carbon-Neutral Technologies for Maritime Transport)
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

Back to TopTop