Search Results (1,298)

Background/Objectives: Due to the significant overlap in symptoms between COVID-19 and other respiratory infections, a multiplex PCR-based platform was developed to simultaneously detect 22 respiratory pathogens. Target sequences were retrieved from the GenBank database and aligned using Clustal Omega 2.1 to identify conserved regions prioritized for primer design. Primers were designed using Primer Express^® 3.0.1 and evaluated in Primer Explorer to ensure specificity and minimize secondary structures. A multiplex strategy organized primers into three groups, each labeled with distinct fluorophores (FAM, VIC, or NED), allowing for detection by conventional PCR or capillary electrophoresis (CE). Methods: After reverse transcription for RNA targets, amplification was performed in a single-tube reaction. A total of 340 clinical samples—nasopharyngeal and saliva swabs—were collected from patients, during the COVID-19 pandemic period. The automated analysis of electropherograms enabled precise pathogen identification. Results: Of the samples analyzed, 57.1% tested negative for all pathogens. SARS-CoV-2 was the most frequently detected pathogen (29%), followed by enterovirus (6.5%). Positive results were detected in both nasopharyngeal and saliva swabs, with SARS-CoV-2 predominating in saliva samples. Conclusion: This single-tube multiplex PCR-CE assay represents a cost-effective and robust approach for comprehensive respiratory pathogen detection. It enables rapid and simultaneous diagnosis, facilitating targeted treatment strategies and improved patient outcomes. Full article

The development of severe SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia is characterized by extensive lung inflammation, which, in turn, leads to respiratory distress and a decline in blood oxygen levels. Hospital admission, along with intensive care or ventilator usage, becomes necessary because this condition leads to serious respiratory problems. This review aims to provide a comprehensive overview of the pathophysiological mechanisms, diagnostic methods, and current therapeutic options for pneumonia caused by the SARS-CoV-2 virus. The pathophysiological process of severe pneumonia due to SARS-CoV-2 infection is characterized by direct lung damage from viral replication, an excessive immune system response, inflammation, impaired gas exchange, and multi-organ failure. The coexistence of various medical conditions leads to substantial lung impairment, resulting in hypoxia and respiratory failure, which can ultimately lead to fatal outcomes. The diagnosis of severe SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia is made through a combination of clinical, radiologic, and laboratory findings. A multifaceted approach integrating antiviral therapy, corticosteroids, oxygen supplementation, ventilatory management, and immunomodulation is imperative to control inflammation and enhance clinical outcomes. Early intervention, meticulous monitoring, and personalized care are paramount for enhancing survival and mitigating complications in critically ill patients with COVID-19 pneumonia. Full article

Background and Objectives: Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) may cause extensive multi-organ pathology, particularly in the lungs, heart, kidneys, and liver. While hypercoagulability—often signaled by elevated D-dimer—has been thoroughly investigated, the concurrent pathological findings across organs and their interrelation with distinct D-dimer levels remain incompletely characterized. This study aimed to evaluate the pathological changes observed in autopsied or deceased COVID-19 patients, focusing on the prevalence of organ-specific lesions, and to perform subgroup analyses based on three D-dimer categories. Methods: We conducted a retrospective review of 69 COVID-19 patients from a Romanian-language dataset, translating all clinical and pathological descriptions into English. Pathological findings (pulmonary microthrombi, bronchopneumonia, myocardial fibrosis, hepatic steatosis, and renal tubular necrosis) were cataloged. Patients were grouped into three categories by admission D-dimer: <500 ng/mL, 500–2000 ng/mL, and ≥2000 ng/mL. Laboratory parameters (C-reactive protein, fibrinogen, and erythrocyte sedimentation rate) and clinical outcomes (intensive care unit [ICU] admission, mechanical ventilation, and mortality) were also recorded. Intergroup comparisons were performed with chi-square tests for categorical data and one-way ANOVA or the Kruskal–Wallis test for continuous data. Results: Marked organ pathology was significantly more frequent in the highest D-dimer group (≥2000 ng/mL). Pulmonary microthrombi and bronchopneumonia increased stepwise across ascending D-dimer strata (p < 0.05). Myocardial and renal lesions similarly showed higher prevalence in patients with elevated D-dimer. Correlation analysis revealed that severe lung and heart pathologies were strongly associated with high inflammatory markers and a greater risk of ICU admission and mortality. Conclusions: Our findings underscore that COVID-19-related organ damage is magnified in patients with significantly elevated D-dimer. By integrating pathology reports with clinical and laboratory data, we highlight the prognostic role of hypercoagulability and systemic inflammation in the pathogenesis of multi-organ complications. Stratifying patients by D-dimer may inform more tailored management strategies, particularly in those at highest risk of severe pathology and adverse clinical outcomes. Full article

Background: Osteogenesis imperfecta (OI) is a rare genetic connective tissue disorder characterized by bone fragility, most often caused by pathogenic variants in type I collagen genes. In this context, we aimed to describe the clinical and epidemiological characteristics of patients with OI who were hospitalized for coronavirus disease (COVID)-19 in Brazil between 2020 and 2024. Methods: We conducted a retrospective descriptive analysis using data from the Brazilian Unified Health System (SUS, which stands for the Portuguese Sistema Único de Saúde) through the Open-Data-SUS platform. Patients with a confirmed diagnosis of OI and hospitalization due to COVID-19 were included. Descriptive statistical analysis was performed to evaluate demographic, clinical, and outcome-related variables. We included all hospitalized COVID-19 cases with a confirmed diagnosis of OI between 2020 and 2024. Results: Thirteen hospitalized patients with OI and COVID-19 were identified. Most were adults (9; 69.2%), male (7; 53.8%), self-identified as White (9; 69.2%), and all were residents of urban areas (13; 100.0%). The most frequent symptoms were fever (10; 76.9%), cough (9; 69.2%), oxygen desaturation (9; 69.2%), dyspnea (8; 61.5%), and respiratory distress (7; 53.8%). Two patients had heart disease, one had chronic lung disease, and one was obese. As for vaccination status, five patients (38.5%) had been vaccinated against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). Four patients (30.8%) required admission to an intensive care unit (ICU), and six (46.2%) required noninvasive ventilatory support. Among those admitted to the ICU, only two required invasive mechanical ventilation. The clinical outcome was death in two cases (15.4%). Both patients were male, White, and had not been vaccinated against SARS-CoV-2. One was 47 years old, was not admitted to the ICU, but required noninvasive ventilation. Despite the underlying condition most patients had favorable outcomes, consistent with an international report. Conclusions: This is the first report to describe the clinical and epidemiological profile of patients with OI hospitalized for COVID-19 in Brazil, providing initial insights into how a rare bone disorder intersects with an acute respiratory infection. The generally favorable outcomes observed—despite the underlying skeletal fragility—suggest that individuals with OI are not necessarily at disproportionate risk of severe COVID-19, particularly when appropriately monitored. The occurrence of deaths only among unvaccinated patients underscores the critical role of SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in this population. Although pharmacological treatment data were unavailable, the potential protective effects of bisphosphonates and vitamin D merit further exploration. These findings support the need for early preventive strategies, systematic vaccination efforts, and dedicated clinical protocols for rare disease populations during infectious disease outbreaks. Full article

(1) Background: The ongoing global health threat posed by SARS-CoV-2 requires reliable and accessible diagnostic tools, especially in resource-limited settings where RT-qPCR may be impractical. This study describes the development and validation of two enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA) designed to detect anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG antibodies employing recombinant S1 and S2 spike protein subunits. (2) Methods: The assays were optimized and validated using serum samples from 354 RT-qPCR-confirmed hospitalized patients and 337 pre-pandemic blood donors. (3) Results: The S1-based ELISA achieved a 52.8% sensitivity and a specificity of 93.5%, with an area under the ROC curve (AUC) of 71.6%. In contrast, the S2-based ELISA demonstrated superior diagnostic performance, with a sensitivity of 63.7%, a specificity of 99.7%, and an AUC of 83.1%. Cross-reactivity analysis using sera from individuals with unrelated infectious diseases confirmed the high specificity of the S2-ELISA. Time-stratified analysis revealed that sensitivity increased with time, peaking between 15 and 21 days post-symptom onset. Compared to commercial serological assays, the S2-ELISA demonstrated comparable or improved performance, particularly in specificity and diagnostic odds ratio. (4) Conclusions: The S2-ELISA offers a robust, highly specific, and operationally simple tool for serological detection of SARS-CoV-2 infection. Its strong diagnostic performance and accessibility make it well-suited for implementation in diverse epidemiological settings, particularly where molecular testing is limited. The development of affordable, validated serological assays such as this is critical for strengthening surveillance, understanding transmission dynamics, and informing public health responses. Full article

Background: Reports of primary cutaneous lymphomas (CLs) following COVID-19 vaccines are extremely rare. Nevertheless, clinicians should be aware of a potential association between these events. Here, we report a case of the development and rapid progression of mycosis fungoides (MF) with lymph node involvement after COVID-19 vaccination. Case presentation: A 75-year-old female developed disseminated plaques and patches shortly after receiving the first dose of the SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccine. Within one month following the second dose of the mRNA vaccine, she additionally experienced rapid progression, leading to the development of tumors and inguinal lymphadenopathy. Blood and visceral involvement were excluded. The clinicopathological findings were consistent with the diagnosis of MF, and systemic methotrexate with topical treatment was implemented, resulting in remission of the lesions. Conclusions: The presented case of the development and rapid progression of MF after the SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccine raises the question of the possible immunomodulatory or oncomodulatory effects of mRNA vaccines. It prompted us to conduct a review outlining the mechanisms potentially causing the mRNA vaccine-associated CLs. We have performed an extensive literature search to determine an explanation for the observed phenomenon. Accumulated evidence suggests a link between CL occurrence and immunization with an mRNA vaccine. The proposed hypothesis revolves around shared signaling pathways that are enhanced by SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccines, thus driving the pathogenesis of MF. We want to raise clinicians’ attention to the rare side effects of COVID-19 vaccines and emphasize the need for thorough monitoring of patients with altered immunity in the course of various lymphoproliferative disorders. Full article

Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS) represents a significant cause of morbidity and mortality in children under one year of age, a particularly vulnerable population due to immunological and respiratory immaturity. The diverse etiology includes multiple respiratory viruses such as Respiratory Syncytial Virus (RSV), influenza, rhinovirus, and SARS-CoV-2, each with distinct potential to cause severe illness and death. Understanding the specific incidence and lethality by etiological agents in the recent Brazilian context (2024), after the COVID-19 pandemic, is essential to guide surveillance and public health strategies. This study aimed to analyze the risk of incidence and lethality by specific etiology of SARS in children under one year of age hospitalized in Brazil during the year 2024. A descriptive cross-sectional study was performed using secondary data from the 2024 Influenza Epidemiological Surveillance Information System (SIVEP-Gripe), obtained via OpenDataSUS. Reported cases of SARS hospitalized in children <1 year of age in Brazil were included. Distribution by final classification and epidemiological week (EW) was analyzed; the incidence rate by Federative Unit (FU) (cases/100,000 < 1 year) with risk classification (Low/Moderate/High) was assessed; and, for cases with positive viral RT-PCR, the etiological frequency and virus-specific lethality rate (deaths/total cases of etiology ×100), also with risk classification, were extracted. A multivariate logistic regression model was performed for the risk factors of death. A total of 66,170 cases of SARS were reported in children under 1 year old (national incidence: 2663/100,000), with a seasonal peak between April and May. The majority of cases were classified as “SARS due to another respiratory virus” (49.06%) or “unspecified” (37.46%). Among 36,009 cases with positive RT-PCR, RSV (50.06%) and rhinovirus (26.97%) were the most frequent. The overall lethality in RT-PCR-positive cases was 1.28%. Viruses such as parainfluenza 4 (8.57%), influenza B (2.86%), parainfluenza 3 (2.49%), and SARS-CoV-2 (2.47%) had higher lethality. The multivariate model identified parainfluenza 4 (OR = 6.806), chronic kidney disease (OR = 3.820), immunodeficiency (OR = 3.680), Down Syndrome (OR = 3.590), heart disease (OR = 3.129), neurological disease (OR = 2.250), low O₂ saturation (OR = 1.758), SARS-CoV-2 (OR = 1.569) and respiratory distress (OR = 1.390) as risk factors for death. Cough (OR = 0.477) and RSV (OR = 0.736) were associated with a lower chance of death. The model had good calibration (Hosmer–Lemeshow p = 0.693) and overall significance (p < 0.001). SARS represented a substantial burden of hospitalizations, with marked seasonal and geographic patterns. RSV and rhinovirus were the main agents responsible for the volume of confirmed cases but had a relatively low to moderate risk of lethality. In contrast, less frequent viruses such as parainfluenza 4, influenza B, parainfluenza 3, and SARS-CoV-2 were associated with a significantly higher risk of death. These findings highlight the importance of dissociating frequency from lethality and reinforce the need to strengthen etiological surveillance, improve diagnosis, and direct preventive strategies (such as immunizations) considering the specific risk of each pathogen for this vulnerable population. Full article

Neuropathic pain has emerged as a significant concern for patients dealing with persistent post-COVID-19 symptoms. Small fiber neuropathy (SFN) has been identified as a potential underlying mechanism contributing to long-term pain in these patients. Despite an increasing body of evidence associating post-COVID-19 SFN with immune dysregulation and neuroinflammation, the exact pathophysiology and optimal treatment remains unclear. This review aims to explore the pathophysiology, diagnosis, proposed mechanisms, and treatment of post-COVID-19 SFN. A comprehensive literature review was conducted, examining studies on SFN, as well as SFN in the context of COVID-19, including clinical manifestations, diagnostic criteria, and potential treatment modalities. Evidence was gathered from case studies, observational reports, and clinical trials addressing post-COVID-19 neuropathy and SFN. SFN in long COVID presents a heterogeneous range of sensory and autonomic symptoms. Diagnosis relies on clinical evaluation, quantitative sensory testing, and confirmatory skin biopsy. Proposed mechanisms include autoimmune dysregulation, molecular mimicry, direct viral invasion of neural structures, and inflammatory responses. Pharmacological treatments—such as gabapentin, antidepressants, and corticosteroids—have demonstrated symptom relief, while immunomodulatory therapies show promise in immune-mediated cases. Non-pharmacological strategies warrant further investigation. Post-COVID-19 SFN represents a complex and multifactorial condition requiring a multidisciplinary approach to diagnosis and management. While merging evidence supports immune-mediated pathogenesis, further research is needed to establish definitive mechanisms and optimize targeted therapeutic strategies. Continued investigation into post-COVID-19 SFN will be crucial in addressing the long-term neurological sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 infection. Full article

Background: Increasing evidence suggests that the immunogenicity of COVID-19 mRNA vaccines might influence the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). Current studies have not considered the impact of additional vaccinations, which are now recommended as a preventive strategy against SARS-CoV-2 infection for cancer patients receiving active treatments. Consequently, we leveraged the prospective monitoring from the Vax-On-Third study to explore whether periodic mRNA vaccine boosters administered around the start of ICIs could influence the rates of immune-related adverse events (irAEs) and survival outcomes in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Methods: Our study included patients with a histological diagnosis of metastatic NSCLC and available PD-L1 tumor proportion score (TPS), who had undergone at least two cycles of upfront treatment with pembrolizumab, cemiplimab, or their combination with platinum-based chemotherapy. Patients who received any additional mRNA-based vaccine doses within 60 days before to 30 days after starting ICIs accounted for the exposed cohort. Those who declined further boosters formed the reference cohort. We analyzed differences in irAE frequencies, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) using univariate and multivariate analyses. Results: Between 27 November 2021 and 31 March 2024, we enrolled 226 eligible patients. The exposed cohort consisted of 112 patients who had received either a third or fourth dose of tozinameran or a bivalent booster. Based on PD-L1 expression levels, 93 (41%) and 133 (59%) patients received single-agent ICIs (PD-L1 TPS ≥ 50%) or combination regimens (PD-L1 TPS < 50%), respectively. Propensity-score matching using comprehensive criteria resulted in two cohorts of 102 patients each, with an optimal balance of prognostic factors. A thorough analysis of any grade irAEs showed no significant differences between the cohorts. A longitudinal survival assessment with a median follow-up of 22.8 (95% CI 19.2–26.0) months showed no difference between the cohorts. The median PFS for the reference and exposed cohorts was 7.5 (95% CI 5.9–9.1) and 8.2 (95% CI 6.2–10.2) months, respectively (p = 0.408; HR 0.88 [95% CI 0.66–1.18]). The median OS for the reference and exposed cohorts was 10.5 (95% CI 7.9–13.0) and 13.8 (95% CI 12.0–15.5) months, respectively (p = 0.170; HR 0.81 [95% CI 0.59–1.09]). Multivariate analysis confirmed that receiving additional mRNA vaccine boosters did not significantly affect the risk of disease progression or mortality. Univariate analysis within the subgroup of patients with high PD-L1 TPS who received single-agent ICIs showed a significant OS advantage for patients in the exposed cohort (9.7 [95% CI 8.1–11.2] vs. 18.6 [95% CI 13.5–23.6] months; p = 0.034; HR 0.59 [95% CI 0.36–0.96]). Conclusion: After optimally balancing prognostic factors, regular mRNA vaccine boosters at the onset of ICIs did not impact the safety and survival of patients with advanced NSCLC. The improved outcome observed in patients with high PD-L1 expression levels aligns with previous findings and warrants further investigation. Full article

Background/Objectives: The COVID-19 pandemic, caused by SARS-CoV-2, required the rapid development of diagnostic tests. SARS-CoV-2, part of the betacoronavirus genus, shares characteristics with SARS-CoV-1, including its ability to survive on surfaces, facilitating the spread of the infection. This study analyzes the technique of nasopharyngeal secretion collection for SARS-CoV-2 diagnosis and compares the accuracy of rapid antigen and molecular tests. Methods: This study had two components: study A assessed the healthcare personnel training in collecting nasopharyngeal secretions and the discomfort associated with applying a questionnaire. Study B compared rapid antigen test accuracy with RT-PCR among children, through a retrospective analysis. The data were statistically analyzed to assess compliance with the testing protocols. Results: In study A, 88 healthcare workers achieved an average compliance score of 7.60 out of 10 regarding the collection procedure. Over 70% of participants correctly followed the fundamental steps of the procedure. Many patients who underwent sample collection reported pain and symptoms such as coughing or sneezing. In study B, 198 pediatric patients were tested using rapid antigen tests, collected simultaneously with RT-PCR. The rapid tests showed a 50% sensitivity and 97.5% specificity. Conclusions: This study indicates that nasopharyngeal specimen collection techniques are based on international recommendations, but improvements could be made to reduce discomfort. Rapid antigen tests are helpful for screening due to their high specificity and negative predictive value. Continuous healthcare personnel training and the monitoring of diagnostic techniques remain essential in managing SARS-CoV-2 and other viral infections. Full article

Background/Objectives: The clinical forms of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vary widely in severity, ranging from asymptomatic or moderate cases to severe pneumonia that can lead to acute respiratory failure, acute respiratory distress syndrome, multiple organ dysfunction syndrome, and death. Our main objective was to determine the prevalence of bacterial and fungal secondary infections in an intensive care unit (ICU). Secondary objectives included analyzing the impact of these infections on mortality and medical resource utilization, as well as assessing antimicrobial resistance in this context. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study that included critically ill severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) patients treated in an ICU and analyzed the prevalence of co-infections and superinfections. Results: A multivariate analysis of mortality found that the presence of superinfections increased the odds of death by more than 15-fold, while the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score and C-reactive protein (adjusted for confounders) increased the odds of mortality by 51% and 13%, respectively. The antibiotic resistance profile of microorganisms indicated a high prevalence of resistant strains. Carbapenems, glycopeptides, and oxazolidinones were the most frequently used classes of antibiotics. Among patients, 27.9% received a single antibiotic, 47.5% received two from different classes, and 24.4% were treated with three or more. Conclusions: The incidence and spectrum of bacterial and fungal superinfections are higher in critically ill ICU patients, leading to worse outcomes in COVID-19 cases. Multidrug-resistant pathogens present significant challenges for ICU and public health settings. Early screening, accurate diagnosis, and minimal use of invasive devices are essential to reduce risks and improve patient outcomes. Full article

COVID-19, which is caused by the SARS-CoV-2 virus, has caused millions of cases and fatalities around the world. It is clearer and clearer how ex-COVID-19 patients endure neurological symptoms, such as headaches and cognitive impairment, in addition to respiratory problems. Long COVID refers to symptoms that continue after the acute phase, impacting millions of people and having severe socioeconomic consequences. The pathogenesis of neurological symptoms in long-term COVID is still unknown, making diagnosis and management difficult. The purpose of this review is to investigate the ophthalmological/neurological effects of prolonged COVID and the possibility of eye-tracking technology as an objective biomarker for diagnosis and monitoring. A scoping literature review was carried out, yielding 15 relevant studies. Several ophthalmological signals, such as saccadic movements and pupillary reflexes, were found to be significantly affected in patients with long COVID. These signals were measured using a variety of methods, including infrared cameras and eye-tracking systems. The study emphasises the need for more research to develop standardised biomarkers for long COVID diagnosis and monitoring. Understanding the ophthalmological impacts of long COVID can help develop novel tools for assessing and controlling this disorder. Full article

The aim of the study was to determine the prevalence rates of respiratory pathogens using syndromic tests and also to show which respiratory viruses were detected in suspected cases, especially during and after the pandemic period. A total of 1984 different respiratory tract samples from various departments were included and studied with the QIAstat-Dx device in 2021–2023. The samples were studied with the QIAstat-Dx1 Respiratory SARS-CoV-2 Panel. The kit used was a fully automated, multiplex syndromic test that detected SARS-CoV-2 and 21 other respiratory tract pathogens. As a result of the study, the prevalence of Rhinovirus/Enterovirus (RV/EV) (18.59%), RV/EV-SARS-CoV-2 (42.74%), SARS-CoV-2 (5.04%), and Influenza A Virus (IAV) (5.59%) agents was found to be higher than other agents during the period investigated. Among the 1984 patients examined, 959 (48.33%) had a single viral agent, 156 (7.86%) had double coinfection, 11 (0.55%) had triple coinfection and 1 patient had quadruple coinfection. Nearly half of the patients had a straightforward infection, which helps clinicians in directing specific treatment methods. The study results demonstrate that during the pandemic period, the detection of respiratory pathogens such as SARS-CoV-2 and RV/EV was not only critical for accurate diagnosis but also served as an important indicator of the broader epidemiological trends in respiratory infections. The seasonal distribution showed that while RV/EV was frequently present, its coinfection with SARS-CoV-2 was notably observed only in the first trimester. In light of our findings showing high rates of SARS-CoV-2 and RV/EV detection, along with diverse patterns of coinfection in clinical samples, such comprehensive testing not only assists in rapid diagnosis but also informs public health strategies by reflecting the evolving landscape of respiratory infections in the pandemic and post-pandemic era. Full article

Background/Objectives: Myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS) is a debilitating condition with not fully understood causes, though evidence points to immune system involvement and possible autoimmunity. ME/CFS could be triggered by various infectious pathogens, like SARS-CoV-2; furthermore, a subset of the post-COVID-19 condition (PCC) patients fulfill the diagnostic criteria of ME/CFS. According to the Canadian Consensus Criteria (CCC), the presence of specific symptoms such as fatigue, post-exertional malaise, sleep dysfunction, pain, neurological/cognitive manifestations, and symptoms from at least two of the following categories lead to the diagnosis of ME/CFS: autonomic, neuroendocrine, and immune manifestation. In this study, the patient selection was based on the identification of ME/CFS patients with elevated autoantibodies, regardless of the triggering factor of their condition. Methods: The aim of this study was to identify ME/CFS patients among long COVID patients with elevated autoantibodies. In seven cases, plasmapheresis (PE) and intravenous immunoglobulins (IVIGs) with repetitive autoantibody measurements were applied: four PE sessions on days 1, 5, 30, and 60, and a low-dose IVIG therapy after each treatment. Antibodies were measured before the first PE and two weeks after the last PE session. To monitor clinical outcomes, the following somatic and psychometric follow-up assessments were conducted before the first PE, 2 weeks after the second, and 2 weeks after the last PE: the Schellong test, ISI (insomnia), FSS (fatigue), HADS (depression and anxiety), and EQ-5D-5L (quality of life) questionnaires. Results: There was a negative association between both the β2-adrenergic and M3-muscarinic receptor autoantibody concentration and the quality of life measurements assessed with the EQ-5D-5L questionnaire. Per 1 U/mL increase in the concentration levels of β2-adrenergic receptor antibodies or M3-muscarinic acetylcholine receptor antibodies, the EQ-5D-5L index score [−0.59 to 1] decreased by 0.01 (0.63%) or 0.02 (1.26%), respectively. There were no significant associations between the ISI, HADS, and FSS questionnaires and the β1-adrenergic and M4-muscarinic receptor antibodies titers. Conclusions: After a thorough selection of patients with present autoantibodies, this pilot study found negative associations concerning autoantibody concentration and somatic, as well as psychological wellbeing. To validate these promising feasibility study results—indicating the potential therapeutic potential of antibody-lowering methods—further investigation with larger sample sizes is needed. Full article

Some studies suggested a high incidence of human herpesvirus (HHV) reactivation in severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection. To evaluate the prevalence of HHV reactivations in a population with various severity degrees of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), we analyzed 102 individuals and compared them with 51 SARS-CoV-2-negative subjects admitted in the same period (January–July 2022) for acute respiratory failure. Positivity was found in 76% of subjects for at least one HHV, and in 46% for ≥2 HHV. These proportions were more prevalent in SARS-CoV-2-positive than in negative patients (83% vs. 61%; 56% vs. 27%, respectively). The most common HHV was HHV-7 both in the whole population (51%) and in SARS-CoV-2-positive and -negative subjects (57% and 39%, respectively); human cytomegalovirus, herpes simplex virus-1, Epstein–Barr virus, and HHV-6 were more represented in SARS-CoV-2-positive individuals. No single or combined HHV reactivation was associated with the 60-day mortality rate. However, cytomegalovirus reactivation was an independent predictor of COVID-19 severity and longer hospitalizations, while the occurrence of ≥3 any HHV reactivations was independently associated with the aforementioned outcomes and ventilatory support need. Taken together, our data suggest that in patients with moderate-to-severe COVID-19, the diagnosis of HHV coinfections can add useful prognostic information. Full article