Search Results (17)

Background/Objectives: Germ cell tumors are the most common neoplasia in males < 50 y. In two case series, thromboembolic events (TEs) were reported in 8% and 13% of patients undergoing chemotherapy, whereas arterial thromboembolic events (ATEs) in other types of cancer treated with cisplatin had a frequency of 2% in a retrospective series and 0.67% in a meta-analysis. Recent data found a frequency of 2.4% for ATE in a large cohort of testicular cancer patients. Risk factors are not clearly identified, and given the severity of these events, further exploration is needed to determine appropriate preventive measures. Methods: We performed a retrospective cohort study of 171 patients undergoing chemotherapy for germ cell tumors in two centers in Switzerland and recorded the occurrence of ATE or venous thromboembolic events (VTEs) during chemotherapy or in the 3 months after its completion. Results: of 171 patients, 33.3% underwent adjuvant chemotherapy for stage I disease. Overall, 32 patients had a TE (18.7%, 95% CI 13.3–25.5%), 26 (15.2%, 95% CI 10.3–21.7%) had VTEs, and 11 (6.4%, 95% CI 3.4–11.5%) had ATEs. Five patients had both a VTE and ATE. VTEs were associated with disease stage (II, III, or relapse, with OR 15.6, p = 0.0002), retroperitoneal lymph nodes ≥ 3.5 cm (OR 3.2, p = 0.012), LDH > 500 UI/L (OR 5.3, p = 0.0025), and age > 35 y (OR 3.4, p = 0.005). The Khorana Score (KS) varied between 1 and 2 in 96% of the patients. ATEs were associated with active smoking (OR 6.5 p = 0.010), KS of ≥2 (OR 6.4 p = 0.004), and age > 35 y (OR 6.3, p = 0.01). Conclusions: Our findings show that ATEs are more frequent in our cohort than previous reports. We found a strong association between smoking and ATEs, which should be further assessed. Platinum-induced endothelial damage may be amplified by smoking in young patients in the absence of other risk factors and preventive medication. Full article

Background/Objectives: Patients with advanced ovarian cancer face a high risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE). This study evaluates the incidence and risk factors for pulmonary thromboembolism (PE) in patients with advanced high-grade serous ovarian carcinoma (HGSOC) undergoing primary treatment, with a focus on personalized risk stratification. Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on women with FIGO stage IIIA-IVB HGSOC treated at the University Hospital of Parma between January 2012 and May 2023. All patients underwent CT-based staging prior to primary treatment. When resectability was uncertain, diagnostic laparoscopy and the Fagotti score were performed. Based on cytoreductive potential, patients received either primary debulking surgery (PDS) followed by adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) or neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) followed by interval debulking surgery (IDS) and AC. The Khorana score, a thromboembolic risk model, was calculated prior to chemotherapy. Logistic regression was used to assess the association between baseline characteristics and PE. Results: Among 167 HGSOC patients analyzed, 13 (7.8%) experienced PE. Among the 115 patients undergoing diagnostic laparoscopy, each 2-point increase in the Fagotti score above 8 raised PE risk by 76% (OR 1.76, p = 0.006, 95% CI: 1.17–2.63). Patients undergoing NACT-IDS had a significantly higher risk of PE (OR 4.04, 95% CI: 1.19–13.74, p = 0.02) than patients who underwent PDS. A Khorana score of 3 was an independent predictor of PE (OR 37.66, 95% CI: 2.43–582.36, p = 0.009). Conclusions: Based on our results, NACT followed by IDS or a Fagotti score greater than 8 were associated with increased PE risk in HGSOC patients. Khorana score was the strongest predictor of PE in HGSOC patients. Full article

Background and Objectives: Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a serious complication frequently encountered in cancer patients and is associated with high morbidity. In patients undergoing cancer treatment—particularly those receiving chemotherapy—VTE increases treatment-related complications and has a direct impact on mortality. The development of VTE in oncology patients varies depending on cancer type, treatment protocols, and individual patient characteristics. The Khorana Risk Score (KRS) is a validated risk assessment tool used to estimate the risk of VTE development in patients receiving chemotherapy. KRS provides risk estimations based on the patient’s clinical features, cancer type, and treatment process. This study aims to investigate the prognostic value of the Khorana Risk Score in predicting VTE development and overall survival in patients with metastatic gastric cancer. Materials and Methods: This retrospective study used data from 337 metastatic gastric cancer patients who presented to Kartal Dr. Lütfi Kırdar City Hospital between January 2012 and June 2024. Patients were categorized into intermediate- and high-risk groups according to the Khorana Risk Score. The study’s primary endpoints were the development of VTE and overall survival. Results: There was no statistically significant difference in VTE incidence (p = 0.27) or overall survival (11.9 months vs. 11.5 months, p = 0.23) between patients in the intermediate- and high-risk groups. Conclusions: These results indicate that the Khorana Risk Score is insufficient in predicting VTE development in patients with metastatic gastric cancer and has a weak association with overall survival outcomes. In conclusion, this study demonstrates the KRS’s inadequacy in predicting VTE and survival outcomes in patients with metastatic gastric cancer, highlighting the need for more tailored approaches. Full article

Thrombosis is a critical complication in lymphomas, driven by chronic inflammation. To observe this systemic mechanism, we evaluated inflammatory cytokines, neutrophil and monocyte activation, and platelet function in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), follicular lymphoma (FL), and Hodgkin lymphoma (HL), with and without thrombosis using ELISA and flow cytometry according to laboratory and clinical data. Interleukin-1β was elevated across lymphomas and inversely correlated with the Khorana score for venous thromboembolism, while increased tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α) was inversely associated with the International Prognostic Index (IPI) in thrombosis-associated lymphomas. Neutrophil activation was increased in DLBCL, while elevated neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs) biomarkers were inversely consistent with thrombosis and the ThroLy score. NETs were elevated in HL. Classical monocytes were increased in all lymphoma subtypes, with intermediate and tissue factor (TF)-carrying monocytes elevated in DLBCL and HL. Platelet activation was pronounced, with platelet–monocyte aggregates and platelet-associated TF elevated in DLBCL and FL but not HL. P-selectin was increased in lymphomas with thrombosis, aligned with Khorana and ThroLy scores, and reflected clinical stage while inversely correlating with IPI in non-thrombotic lymphomas. These findings highlight distinct thromboinflammatory mechanisms across lymphoma subtypes, providing insights into biomarkers for thrombosis risk and therapeutic targets in lymphoma management. Full article

Background: Data on the performance of the Khorana, PROTECHT, and ONKOTEV risk assessment models (RAMs) to predict venous thromboembolism (VTE) in patients with pancreatic cancer (PC) receiving outpatient chemotherapy remain limited. We performed a head-to-head comparison of these RAMs in patients with newly diagnosed PC enrolled in the nationwide, multicenter, and prospective BACAP cohort. Methods: The Khorana, PROTECHT, and ONKOTEV scores were calculated at enrollment prior to chemotherapy. Patients were stratified into intermediate- and high-VTE-risk groups according to each RAM. The primary study outcome was VTE at a 6-month follow-up. The accuracy and discriminatory performance of the scores were assessed by calculating time-dependent Brier scores and c-indexes. Sub-distribution hazard ratios (SHRs) between high- and intermediate-risk patients were estimated. Results: Of 762 PC patients, 73 developed VTE within 6 months. In the competing risk analysis, the cumulative incidence of VTE at 6 months was 16.4% (95% CI, 13.8–19.1). The time-dependent Brier score was 0.14 (95% CI, 0.12–0.15) for all scores, indicating well-calibrated predictions. The respective time-dependent c-index of the Khorana, the PROTECHT, and the ONKOTEV scores was 0.50 (95% CI, 0.46–0.55), 0.50 (95% CI, 0.49–0.51), and 0.53 (95% CI, 0.48–0.58), indicating poor discrimination. The SHRs between high- and intermediate-risk patients ranged from 1.05 (95% CI, 0.76–1.44) for the ONKOTEV score to 1.06 (95% CI, 0.77–1.45) for the Khorana score. Conclusion: In newly diagnosed PC patients receiving outpatient chemotherapy, the Khorana, PROTECHT, and ONKOTEV scores demonstrated a poor performance in predicting VTE at 6 months, highlighting the need for new tools to guide thromboprophylaxis decisions. Full article

Background: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the discriminatory capability of the Khorana, PROTECHT, CONKO, and COMPASS-CAT scores in ambulatory patients with lung cancer. Methods: This retrospective cohort study included 591 patients with newly diagnosed lung cancer. A symptomatic or incidental VTE occurred in 108 patients. Results: The Khorana score at a 2-point threshold had a discriminatory capability with an odds ratio (OR) of 1.80 and an AUC of 0.57 for 6 months, and an OR of 1.51 and an AUC of 0.55 for 12 months. The CONKO score at a 2-point threshold had a stronger discriminatory capability for both 6 months and 12 months with ORs of 3.00 and 2.13, and AUCs of 0.63 and 0.59, respectively. Additionally, higher white blood cell counts, higher neutrophil counts, hypoalbuminaemia, and not undergoing lung surgery were related to VTE occurrence (p < 0.05). Conclusions: The Khorana score with the 2-point threshold was validated in ambulatory patients with lung cancer, with the results indicating a decline in its discriminatory capability over time (at 12 months vs. 6 months from diagnosis). The CONKO score at the original 2-point threshold showed a stronger discriminatory capability but further validation with a larger sample size is recommended. The identified predictors should be further investigated in future research. Full article

Background: Patients with lung cancer face an increased incidence of venous (VTE) and arterial (ATE) thromboembolism. Risk factors for thrombosis remain unclear, particularly the impact of the use of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). We sought to compare the incidence of VTE and ATE in lung cancer patients receiving platinum-based therapy versus those receiving ICIs alone or in combination with chemotherapy and to validate the Khorana risk score for predicting VTE in the era of ICIs. Methods: A retrospective single-institution data analysis of 173 patients diagnosed with locally advanced or metastatic lung cancer at the Jena University hospital between 2015 and 2021. Results: The study revealed a high incidence of VTE (17.9%) and ATE (5.8%). The VTE risk was higher in patients diagnosed with adenocarcinoma (OR 0.29, 95% CI 0.09–0.93) than in patients with other histological types. A prior venous event was associated with an increased risk of recurrent VTE (OR 4.46, 95% CI 1.20–16.63). The incidence of thrombosis under first-line platinum-based chemotherapy did not differ from the incidence under ICIs (p = 0.19). There were no differences in the subgroup of patients who received ICIs alone or combined immunochemotherapy (p = 0.43). The Khorana score failed to predict the risk of VTE correctly. Conclusions: We did not find evidence supporting the theory that ICI therapy (alone or combined) increases the risk of thrombotic events. Adenocarcinoma and a prior history of VTE were strongly associated with an increased risk of VTE. Other scores for thrombotic risk assessment in lung cancer patients should be tested in prospective studies. Full article

Cancer-associated thrombosis is the second leading cause of death in cancer patients, and its incidence has been increasing in recent years. This survey was aimed at gathering information regarding the management of thromboembolic prophylaxis within the MITO (Multicenter Italian Trials in Ovarian Cancer)-MaNGO (Mario Negri Gynecologic Oncology) groups. We designed a self-administered, multiple-choice online questionnaire available only for MITO-MaNGO members for one month, starting in May 2022 and ending in June 2022. We processed one response form per center, and 50 responses were analyzed, with most of the respondents (78%) over 40 years old. We found that 82% of them consider thromboembolic prophylaxis in gynecologic oncology to be relevant. In 82% of the centers, a standardized protocol on venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis is used, which is applied to both patients undergoing surgery and those undergoing chemotherapy. In the remaining 18% of centers, prophylaxis is used exclusively for patients undergoing chemotherapy treatment. Prophylaxis of patients undergoing surgery and chemotherapy treatment is managed in most cases by the surgeon (72%) and oncologist (76%), respectively. Only 26% of respondents use a thromboembolic risk assessment scale, and of these, those used are the Caprini Score (6%), Khorana Score (6%), and Wells Score (2%). The respondents have good knowledge of low-molecular-weight heparin (90%) and average knowledge of dicumarolics (40%), direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) (68%), and antiplatelet agents (40%). The results of our survey indicate that there is a good awareness of thromboembolic prophylaxis in gynecologic oncology. Nevertheless, it is used less in outpatients than in patients undergoing surgery. Moreover, the thromboembolic risk assessment scores are barely used. Full article

Introduction. Cancer-associated thrombosis is a significant prognostic marker in pancreatic neoplasia, with a venous thromboembolism incidence of 17–34%. This study focuses on cancer-associated thrombosis risk factors, screening scores, and treatment options. Materials and Methods. Comprehensive database searches were conducted across Web of Science, PubMed, Reaxys, ScienceDirect, and Scopus. Results. Of the 37 articles reviewed, findings include splanchnic vein thrombosis correlating with pancreatic complications and survival rates. Gender differences in cancer-associated thrombosis risk were inconclusive, while African Americans showed a higher incidence of pulmonary embolism. Various cancer-associated thrombosis staging scores were evaluated, with ONKOTEV score outperforming Khorana. Direct oral anticoagulants were suggested as viable alternatives to low molecular weight heparins. Non-anticoagulant sulfated low molecular weight heparin emerged as a future option, offering reduced bleeding risks with similar efficacy. Conclusions. Managing cancer-associated thrombosis in pancreatic cancer is challenging, highlighting the need for improved understanding, better screening methods, and more effective treatments. Full article

Cancer-associated thrombosis (CAT) is a common complication in lung cancer patients. Lung cancer confers an increased risk of thrombosis compared to other solid malignancies across all stages of the disease. Newer treatment agents, including checkpoint immunotherapy and targeted agents, may further increase the risk of CAT. Different risk-assessment models, such as the Khorana Risk Score, and newer approaches that incorporate genetic risk factors have been used in lung cancer patients to evaluate the risk of thrombosis. The management of CAT is based on the results of large prospective trials, which show similar benefits to low-molecular-weight heparins (LMWHs) and direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) in ambulatory patients. The anticoagulation agent and duration of therapy should be personalized according to lung cancer stage and histology, the presence of driver mutations and use of antineoplastic therapy, including recent curative lung surgery, chemotherapy or immunotherapy. Treatment options should be evaluated in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic, which has been shown to impact the thrombotic risk in cancer patients. This review focuses on the epidemiology, pathophysiology, risk factors, novel predictive scores and management of CAT in patients with active lung cancer, with a focus on immune checkpoint inhibitors. Full article

Background: A majority of patients included in risk assessment models (RAMs) developed to predict venous thromboembolic events (VTE) in lymphoma were non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Our study aims to evaluate the incidence and predictors of VTE, utilizing different RAMs, in patients with classic Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL) treated with adriamycin, bleomycin, vinblastine, and dacarbazine (ABVD). Methods: Adult patients with cHL, treated and followed at our center, were included. Correlations between different variables, Khorana score, and thrombosis in lymphoma (ThroLy) RAMs with VTE were examined using Fisher’s exact test and logistic regression analysis. Results: A total of 321 patients were included, with a median age of 29 (range: 18–83) years. Of them, 169 (52.6%) had advanced-stage disease. Combined modality treatment was given to 169 (52.6%) patients. A total of 52 (16.2%) patients had relapsed or refractory disease. VTE were reported in 15 (4.7%) patients and were mostly during the administration of first-line (n = 8, 53.3%), or salvage chemotherapy (n = 6, 40.0%). There was no correlation between a Khorana score > 2 (p = 0.689) or ThroLy score > 3 (p = 0.335) and VTE. Older age (p = 0.014) and relapsed or refractory disease (p = 0.003) significantly correlated with VTE. Conclusions: VTE are uncommon in cHL. The commonly used RAMs failed to predict VTE. However, older age and relapsed or refractory disease significantly increased this risk. Full article

(1) Background: Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a frequent complication in ambulatory lung cancer patients during chemotherapy and is associated with increased mortality. (2) Methods: We analyzed 568 newly diagnosed metastatic lung cancer patients prospectively enrolled in the HYPERCAN study. Blood samples collected before chemotherapy were tested for thrombin generation (TG) and a panel of hemostatic biomarkers. The Khorana risk score (KRS), new-Vienna CATS, PROTECHT, and CONKO risk assessment models (RAMs) were applied. (3) Results: Within 6 months, the cumulative incidences of VTE and mortality were 12% and 29%, respectively. Patients with VTE showed significantly increased levels of D-dimer, FVIII, prothrombin fragment 1 + 2, and TG. D-dimer and ECOG performance status were identified as independent risk factors for VTE and mortality by multivariable analysis and utilized to generate a risk score that provided a cumulative incidence of VTE of 6% vs. 25%, death of 19% vs. 55%, and in the low- vs. high-risk group, respectively (p < 0.001). While all published RAMs significantly stratified patients for risk of death, only the CATS and CONKO were able to stratify patients for VTE. (4) Conclusions: A new prediction model was generated to stratify lung cancer patients for VTE and mortality risk, where other published RAMs failed. Full article

Multiple myeloma (MM) is associated with an increased risk of venous thrombosis (VTE). In the United Kingdom Medical Research Council (MRC) XI study of patients treated with immunomodulatory therapy, the VTE rate was 11.8% despite 87.7% of the patients being on thromboprophylaxis at the time of thrombosis. In order to effectively prevent VTE events in MM patients, a better understanding of patient and disease risk factors that might predict thrombosis is required. We performed a retrospective cohort analysis of over 300 newly diagnosed MM patients at a tertiary referral centre to determine the VTE rate, predictive factors for VTE, value of the Khorana score for MM VTE events and long-term mortality outcomes. Fifty-four percent of the patients were receiving thromboprophylaxis at the time of the VTE event. The mortality odds ratio was 3.3 (95% CI, 2.4–4.5) in patients who developed VTE in comparison to age-matched controls with MM. A younger age at diagnosis and higher white cell count (WCC) were found to be predictive of VTE events. Our data suggest that standard thromboprophylaxis may not be effective in preventing VTE events in myeloma patients, and alternative strategies, which could include higher-intensity thromboprophylaxis in young patients with a high WCC, are necessary. Full article

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a significant cause of mortality in patients with lung cancer. Despite the availability of a wide range of anticoagulants to help prevent thrombosis, thromboprophylaxis in ambulatory patients is a challenge due to its associated risk of haemorrhage. As a result, anticoagulation is only recommended in patients with a relatively high risk of VTE. Efforts have been made to develop predictive models for VTE risk assessment in cancer patients, but the availability of a reliable predictive model for ambulate patients with lung cancer is unclear. We have analysed the latest information on this topic, with a focus on the lung cancer-related risk factors for VTE, and risk prediction models developed and validated in this group of patients. The existing risk models, such as the Khorana score, the PROTECHT score and the CONKO score, have shown poor performance in external validations, failing to identify many high-risk individuals. Some of the newly developed and updated models may be promising, but their further validation is needed. Full article

Patients with cancer, both hematologic and solid malignancies, are at increased risk for thrombosis and thromboembolism. In addition to general risk factors such as immobility and major surgery, shared by non-cancer patients, cancer patients are exposed to specific thrombotic risk factors. These include, among other factors, cancer-induced hypercoagulation, and chemotherapy-mediated endothelial dysfunction as well as tumor-cell-derived microparticles. After an episode of thrombosis in a cancer patient, secondary thromboprophylaxis to prevent recurrent thromboembolism has long been established and is typically continued as long as the cancer is active or actively treated. On the other hand, primary prophylaxis, even though firmly established in hospitalized cancer patients, has only recently been studied in ambulatory patients. This recent change is mostly due to the emergence of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs). DOACs have a shorter half-life than vitamin K antagonists (VKA), and they overcome the need for parenteral application, the latter of which is associated with low-molecular-weight heparins (LMWH) and can be difficult for the patient to endure in the long term. Here, first, we discuss the clinical trials of primary thromboprophylaxis in the population of cancer patients in general, including the use of VKA, LMWH, and DOACs, and the potential drug interactions with pre-existing medications that need to be taken into account. Second, we focus on special situations in cancer patients where primary prophylactic anticoagulation should be considered, including myeloma, major surgery, indwelling catheters, or immobilization, concomitant diseases such as renal insufficiency, liver disease, or thrombophilia, as well as situations with a high bleeding risk, particularly thrombocytopenia, and specific drugs that may require primary thromboprophylaxis. We provide a novel algorithm intended to aid specialists but also family practitioners and nurses who care for cancer patients in the decision process of primary thromboprophylaxis in the individual patient. Full article