The North China Plain, a major grain production base in China, is facing the chronic threat of climate-change-induced delays in winter wheat sowing, with late sowing constraining yields by shortening the pre-winter growth period, and soil moisture at sowing potentially serving as a
[...] Read more.
The North China Plain, a major grain production base in China, is facing the chronic threat of climate-change-induced delays in winter wheat sowing, with late sowing constraining yields by shortening the pre-winter growth period, and soil moisture at sowing potentially serving as a key factor to alleviate late-sowing losses. However, previous studies have mostly independently analyzed the effects of sowing time or water stress, and there is still a lack of systematic quantitative evaluation on how the interaction effects between the two determine long-term yield potential and risk. To fill this gap, this study aims to quantify, in the context of long-term climate change, the independent and interactive effects of different sowing dates and baseline soil moisture on the growth, yield, and production risk of winter wheat in the North China Plain, and to propose regionally adaptive management strategies. We selected three representative stations—Beijing (BJ), Wuqiao (WQ), and Zhengzhou (ZZ)—and, using long-term meteorological data (1981–2025) and field trial data, undertook local calibration and validation of the APSIM-Wheat model. Based on the validated model, we simulated 20 management scenarios comprising four sowing dates and five baseline soil moisture levels to examine the responses of phenology, aboveground dry matter, and yield, and further defined yield-reduction risk probability and expected yield loss indicators to assess long-term production risk. The results show that the APSIM-Wheat model can reliably simulate the winter wheat growing period (RMSE 4.6 days), yield (RMSE 727.1 kg ha
−1), and soil moisture dynamics for the North China Plain. Long-term trend analysis indicates that cumulative rainfall and the number of rainy days within the conventional sowing window have risen at all three sites. Delayed sowing leads to substantial yield reductions; specifically, compared with S1, the S4 treatment yields about 6.9%, 16.2%, and 16.0% less at BJ, WQ, and ZZ, respectively. Moreover, increasing the baseline soil moisture can effectively compensate for the losses caused by late sowing, although the effect is regionally heterogeneous. In BJ and WQ, raising the baseline moisture to a high level (P85) continues to promote biomass accumulation, whereas in ZZ this promotion diminishes as growth progresses. The risk assessment indicates that increasing baseline moisture can notably reduce the probability of yield loss; for example, in BJ under S4, elevating the baseline moisture from P45 to P85 can reduce risk from 93.2% to 0%. However, in ZZ, even the optimal management (S1P85) still carries a 22.7% risk of yield reduction, and under late sowing (S4P85) the risk reaches 68.2%, suggesting that moisture management alone cannot fully overcome late-sowing constraints in this region. Optimizing baseline soil moisture management is an effective adaptive strategy to mitigate late-sowing losses in winter wheat across the North China Plain, but the optimal approach must be region-specific: for BJ and WQ, irrigation should raise baseline moisture to high levels (P75-P85); for ZZ, the key lies in ensuring baseline moisture crosses a critical threshold (P65) and should be coupled with cultivar selection and fertilizer management to stabilize yields. The study thus provides a scientific basis for regionally differentiated adaptation of winter wheat in the North China Plain to address climate change and achieve stable production gains.
Full article