Search Results (346)

Background/Objectives: The COVID-19 pandemic severely impacted healthcare systems globally, with Italian healthcare professionals experiencing heightened stress, organizational challenges, and a significant psychological burden. This study investigates the frequency of depressive symptoms and health-related quality of life (H-QoL) among outpatient healthcare workers in Italy, comparing pre-pandemic (2017) and post-pandemic (2025) periods. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted in 2025, including 97 healthcare professionals from five outpatient departments at the University Hospital of Cagliari. Participants completed demographic surveys, the Short Form Health Survey (SF-12), and the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) to assess H-QoL and depressive symptoms. Data were compared with previously published data from the same facility collected in 2017 and with pre-pandemic Italian community surveys. Results: Compared to 2017, there was a statistically significant increase in depressive episodes (38.1% vs. 33.2%, p = 0.01) and a higher proportion of individuals with low H-QoL (62.9% vs. 43.5%, p < 0.0001) in 2025. After age- and sex-standardization, both depressive symptoms and low H-QoL were significantly more prevalent among healthcare professionals in 2025 compared with the general population before the pandemic. Within the 2025 sample, non-medical healthcare workers showed a significantly higher prevalence of depressive symptoms than medical doctors, while female healthcare workers were more likely to report low H-QoL. Conclusions: Despite the pandemic’s end, healthcare workers, especially those in outpatient settings, continue to face elevated psychological distress. Specific professional and gender-related vulnerabilities persist, and structural challenges, such as staff shortages and organizational issues, may exacerbate this burden. Sustained mental health support and targeted systemic interventions remain crucial to mitigate the long-term impact on the healthcare workforce. Full article

Background: Depression and eating disorders (EDs) represent significant and often multiple public health concerns. Healthcare workers, including medical residents, were affected by several stressors that the COVID-19 pandemic has engendered and amplified, potentially exacerbating mental health issues. Despite this, limited evidence is available regarding the association between depressive symptoms and possible EDs among Public Health Residents (PHRs). Methods: A nationwide cross-sectional study, the ‘Public Health Residents Anonymous Survey in Italy (PHRASI),’ was conducted between June and July 2022. A total of 379 PHRs participated in this study, filling in a self-administered questionnaire which included the PHQ-9 for assessing depressive symptoms and the SCOFF (Sick, Control, One, Fat, Food) test as a screening tool for possible EDs. Multivariable logistic regression evaluated associations between sociodemographic and training/work-related factors, depressive symptoms, and EDs. Results: Overall, 40.6% of respondents screened positive for possible EDs. Depressive symptoms had a positive association with possible EDs (aOR = 2.76; 95% CI = 1.55–4.93). Other factors associated with higher ED odds included region of residence (aOR = 1.92; 95% CI = 1.06–3.47), intention to repeat the test for another postgraduate course (aOR = 3.22; 95% CI = 1.25–8.3), and working more than 40 h per week (aOR = 1.91; 95% CI = 1.19–3.07). Conversely, having more than one child (aOR = 0.32; 95% CI = 0.13–0.78) was associated with lower odds. Conclusions: The findings highlight a significant association between depressive symptoms and positive screening for possible EDs, underscoring the need for integrated mental health support and preventive interventions within medical residency programmes, especially in the context of public health crises. Full article

Background/Objectives: Healthcare workers (HCW) in primary care settings play a significant role in recommending vaccines to patients. We aimed to describe COVID-19 vaccination knowledge, attitudes, perception, and practices (KAPP) of HCWs in Tunisia and identify associated factors. Methods: We conducted a national cross-sectional survey (29 January to 3 February 2024) among HCWs in primary public healthcare centers using purposive sampling. Factors associated with good knowledge, positive attitude, and good practice, measured through Likert scales using face-to-face questionnaires, were identified using binary logistic regression. Results: We included 906 HCWs (mean age = 41.87 ± 8.89 years). In total, 37.75% (342/906) of HCWs had good knowledge and perception, 4.30% (39/906) had a positive attitude, and 24.9% (226/906) had good practices related to COVID-19 vaccination. Working in urban compared to rural areas was associated with good knowledge (aOR = 1.57, 95%CI = 1.12–2.21) and positive attitude (aOR = 4.94, 95%CI = 1.19–20.44) to COVID-19 vaccination. Physicians had better KAPP scores than other medical professionals. HCWs working in departments with high-risk patients were more likely to have good knowledge (aOR = 1.28, 95%CI = 1.00–1.72). Positive attitude was also associated with being male (aOR = 2.97, 95%CI = 1.75–5.07) and having at least one non-communicable disease (aOR = 1.92, 95%CI = 1.14–3.23). Being male (aOR = 1.97, 95%CI = 1.35–2.88) and having more years of professional experience (aOR = 1.81, 95%CI = 1.29–2.52) were associated with good practice. Conclusions: Just over a third of HCWs in primary healthcare clinics had good knowledge of COVID-19 vaccination, while positive attitudes and good practices were low. Targeted interventions, particularly for HCWs with less professional experience working in rural settings, are needed to increase good practices and improve COVID-19 vaccination coverage in Tunisia. Full article

Background: Some patients suffer from persistent symptoms following a COVID-19 infection, referred to as long COVID. The aims of the study were to estimate the prevalence of long COVID and study its determinants in Tunisia. Methods: We conducted a nationwide cross-sectional study among a representative sample of COVID-19 survivors residing in Tunisia between June and August 2022. We selected a random sample, stratified by age and region, among residents registered in the national surveillance database with a SARS-CoV-2 positive test taken from September 2020 to September 2021 (n = 479,743). The expected sample size was 384. We defined a patient with long COVID as having at least one self-reported symptom persisting for more than four weeks after the first confirmation of SARS-CoV-2 infection (RT-PCR or Ag-RDT) and not explained by an alternative diagnosis. Trained healthcare workers interviewed consenting respondents by phone using a structured questionnaire. We described continuous variables using median and interquartile range (IQR). We measured the prevalence of long COVID and its 95% confidence interval (95% CI). We estimated the association between explanatory variables (socio-demographic, lifestyle and comorbidities, SARS-CoV-2 history infection, COVID-19 vaccination status) and long COVID using a log-binomial model, reporting adjusted prevalence ratios (a-PR) and its 95% CI. Results: Of 1094 persons contacted, 416 were enrolled (response rate: 38%). Long-COVID prevalence was 64% (267/416); 95% CI [59–69%]. The sex ratio (M:F) was 0.72. Age ranged from 1 to 101 years, with a median of 41 years (IQR:31–55 years). The most common symptoms were fatigue (63%), myalgia/arthralgia (33%), and cognitive symptoms (52%). Median duration of long-COVID symptoms was 11 months (IQR: 3–14 months). In multivariate analysis, experiencing acute COVID-19 (a-PR = 1.5; 95% CI [1.0–2.1]), being a woman of childbearing age (a-PR = 1.2; 95% CI [1.0–1.4]) and residing in the central region (a-PR = 1.5; 95% CI [1.1–2.0]) were significantly associated with a higher prevalence of long COVID. Conclusions: Long COVID is prevalent in Tunisia affecting patients with multiple symptoms initially, those residing in the central region and young women. We recommend to enhance healthcare access and medical follow-up both during and after the infection, focusing on identified risk groups. We also recommend to conduct further research to optimize management of long-COVID patients. Full article

The impact of physical health conditions on coronavirus disease of 2019 (COVID-19) severity in World Trade Center disaster-exposed populations remains understudied. We examined the association of type, number and diagnosis time of pre-existing health conditions with COVID-19 severity, using the WTC Health Registry (WTCHR). We analyzed 3568 WTCHR enrollees with self-reported severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection in a 2021 follow-up survey. COVID-19 severity was measured by self-reported symptom duration (<2, 2–4, and >4 weeks) and hospitalization (hospitalized versus not). Pre-existing gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), respiratory conditions, cardiovascular conditions, and diabetes were self-reported and categorized into four groups (no diagnosis, post-9/11, pre-9/11, and undefinable). We used multinomial logistic regression and binary logistic regression to analyze the association of comorbidities with COVID-19 symptom duration and hospitalization, respectively, adjusting for post-traumatic stress disorder and demographic factors. Analysis was also conducted separately by enrollee type: rescue and recovery workers (RRW) vs. community members (non-RRW). Having all four health conditions post-9/11 was associated with longer symptom duration after SARS-CoV-2 infection (>4 weeks) among RRW (AOR: 2.66, 95% CI: 1.03–6.87). Reporting a post-9/11 respiratory condition was associated with an increased risk of being hospitalized among RRW and an increased risk of longer symptom duration (>4 weeks) among non-RRW. While post-9/11 diabetes was associated with an increased risk of longer symptom duration among RRW, post-9/11 GERD and pre-9/11 cardiovascular conditions were associated with an increased risk of longer symptom duration and being hospitalized among non-RRW, respectively. The impact of certain health conditions on COVID-19 severity varied across enrollee types and time of diagnosis. Given the lasting health impacts of 9/11-related exposures, targeted medical surveillance and proactive healthcare interventions are critical for mitigating the risk of severe COVID-19 illness in this population. Full article

Background/Objectives: A medical–government conflict in South Korea in 2024 led to the collective resignation of resident physicians, causing severe workforce shortages in tertiary hospitals. This study aimed to investigate temporal changes in stress, anxiety, and depression among healthcare workers during this conflict following the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods: This retrospective study analyzed data from 56,137 adults who completed validated questionnaires on stress (KNHANES), anxiety (Clinically Useful Anxiety Outcome Scale, CUXOS), and depression (Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale, CES-D) between January 2019 and February 2025 at Samsung Changwon Hospital. Temporal trends were assessed using linear mixed-effects models adjusted for demographic variables. Results: Among attending physicians, stress increased by 1.44 points in the post-COVID period (p < 0.001) and 1.17 points during the conflict (p = 0.006), while anxiety increased by 1.25 (p = 0.012) and 1.36 points (p = 0.013), respectively. The most vulnerable subgroups were women, those aged 30–40 years, and physicians with <5 years of service. Depression increased significantly among physicians in their 40s during the post-COVID period (p = 0.018). Nurses demonstrated a significant reduction in stress during the conflict (−0.91, p = 0.002), possibly reflecting a temporary decrease in direct clinical workload, whereas office workers showed continuous increases in depression (+1.66 post-COVID, p = 0.003; +1.74 conflict, p = 0.001). Conclusions: The psychological effects of systemic crises differed by occupation. Attending physicians, who bore the greatest clinical and organizational burden, experienced persistent psychological strain during the medical–government conflict following post-pandemic stress. Tailored, occupation-specific strategies are required to protect healthcare workers’ mental health during future systemic disruptions. Full article

Racialised minority populations were disproportionately affected by COVID-19 and saw the highest rate of COVID-19 infections and mortality. Low socioeconomic status, working as frontline workers, temporary employment, precarious immigration status and pre-existing medical conditions were factors that contributed to disadvantaged experiences. This systematic review looked at the impact of COVID-19 on racialised minority populations globally, recognising their experiences, perspectives and the effects on their physical and mental health. Eight electronic databases were searched (MEDLINE, PsycINFO, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), Social Sciences Citation Index (SSCI), Social Policy and Practice (SPP), Applied Social Sciences Index and Abstracts (ASSIA), MedRxiv and Research Square) for English language qualitative studies. Reference lists of relevant literature reviews and reference lists of articles were hand-searched for additional potentially relevant articles. Duplicates were removed, and articles were screened for titles and abstracts, followed by full-text screening. The Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT) was used to assess the quality of the included studies (n = 70). Data were synthesised using thematic synthesis. Seven major and three minor themes were identified. The major themes related to (i) children and young people’s experiences of COVID-19; (ii) exacerbated pre-existing disparities relating to income, employment and housing security, health insurance and immigration status; (iii) lack of knowledge and information about COVID-19 and COVID-19 misinformation; (iv) racial history of medicine and treatment of racialised populations; (v) contemporary experiences of racism; (vi) impact on physical and mental health and wellbeing; (vii) concerns about safety at work. Minor themes related to (a) experiences of intercommunity mutual aid; (b) adherence to preventative guidance/COVID-19 restrictions; (c) the role of faith. Research needs to focus on developing and testing interventions that support transformation of social, cultural and economic systems towards equity of access to healthcare and healthcare knowledge. Research should be cognisant of interventions that have worked in shifting the equity dial in the past, implement these and use them to inform new approaches. Policy and practice should be mechanisms for enabling the implementation of interventions. Full article

Background: Healthcare workers (HCWs) are at occupational risk from COVID-19. Understanding the profile of infected HCWs is important to guide workplace protections. Objectives: To describe the demographic and clinical characteristics of HCWs infected with COVID-19 and to examine factors associated with vaccination status among infected HCWs. Methods: The study design was cross-sectional, using medical records from health workers working in a tertiary teaching facility in Gauteng, South Africa, from 12 May 2021 to 11 May 2022. The data were analysed using univariate and multiple logistic regression analysis. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05. Results: A total of 1235 HCW records were included. The age ranged from 17 to 64 years. The median age was 38 years (IQR: 32–48). Nurses accounted for the largest proportion of cases, followed by healthcare assistants and physicians. Female sex, older age, and comorbidity were associated with higher odds of being vaccinated among infected HCWs. Conclusions: This study provides a descriptive profile of HCWs infected with COVID-19 during the third and fourth wave transition in South Africa. The findings highlight demographic and clinical factors linked to vaccination status among infected HCWs and underscore the continued need for infection prevention and control measures to protect frontline staff. Full article

Background: Key populations (KPs), particularly female sex workers (FSWs), continue to face significant barriers in accessing HIV-related healthcare services in South Africa. Structural challenges have historically hindered equitable HIV treatment access, worsened by the COVID-19 pandemic. Overburdened clinics, staff shortages, and travel constraints disrupted HIV services and ART adherence. In response, the Differentiated Service Delivery (DSD) model was rapidly scaled up to decentralise care and improve treatment continuity. Objective: To solicit the views of stakeholders regarding their interests, roles and experiences in the implementation of the HIV treatment DSD model among FSWs in South Africa, as well as associated successes and barriers thereof. Methods: We purposively selected and interviewed eight stakeholders, comprising government officials, implementers and sex workers’ advocacy organizations. Thematic analysis was used to explore the perceived impact of DSD models and associated successes and barriers in the current service delivery landscape. Results: The study found that decentralization of DSD models improved access to services for FSWs. However, the criminalization of sex work perpetuates fear and marginalization, while stigma and discrimination within healthcare settings remain significant deterrents to HIV treatment uptake. High mobility among FSWs also disrupts continuity of care, contributing to treatment interruptions and lack of data on loss to follow-up. Participants highlighted the need for legal reform, increased healthcare provider sensitization, and the integration of mental health and psychosocial support in HIV services. Peer-led interventions and digital health innovations, such as biometric systems and electronic medical records, emerged as promising strategies for enhancing patient tracking and retention. Nonetheless, the sustainability of DSD models is threatened by an overreliance on external donor funding and insufficient government ownership. Conclusions: To achieve equitable healthcare access and improved HIV outcomes for KPs, especially FSWs, a multi-pronged, rights-based approach is essential. This must include community engagement, structural and legal reforms, integrated support services, and sustainable financing mechanisms to ensure the long-term impact and scalability of DSD models. Full article

Background: Healthcare workers face multiple, interlinked occupational health risks—burnout, post-COVID-19 sequelae (Long COVID), and extended medical leave. These outcomes often share predictors, contribute to each other, and, together, impact workforce capacity. Yet, existing tools typically address them in isolation. Objective: The objective of this study to develop and deploy an integrated, explainable artificial intelligence (AI) framework that predicts these three outcomes using the same structured occupational health dataset, enabling unified workforce risk monitoring. Methods: We analyzed data from 1244 Romanian healthcare professionals with 14 demographic, occupational, lifestyle, and comorbidity features. For each outcome, we trained a separate predictive model within a common framework: (1) a lightweight transformer neural network with hyperparameter optimization, (2) a transformer with multi-head attention, and (3) a stacked ensemble combining transformer, XGBoost, and logistic regression. The data were SMOTE-balanced and evaluated on held-out test sets using Accuracy, ROC-AUC, and F1-score, with 10,000-iteration bootstrap testing for statistical significance. Results: The stacked ensemble achieved the highest performance: ROC AUC = 0.70 (burnout), 0.93 (Long COVID), and 0.93 (extended leave). The F1 scores were >0.89 for Long COVID and extended leave, whereas the performance gains for burnout were comparatively modest, reflecting the multidimensional and heterogeneous nature of burnout as a binary construct. The gains over logistic regression were statistically significant (p < 0.0001 for Long COVID and extended leave; p = 0.0355 for burnout). The SHAP analysis identified overlapping top predictors—tenure, age, job role, cancer history, pulmonary disease, and obesity—supporting the value of a unified framework. Conclusions: We trained separate models for each occupational health risk but deployed them in a single, real-time web application. This integrated approach improves efficiency, enables multi-outcome workforce surveillance, and supports proactive interventions in healthcare settings. Full article

Background/Objectives: Long COVID, characterized by persistent symptoms following SARS-CoV-2 infection, poses a significant occupational health concern among healthcare workers (HCWs). This study aimed to evaluate the prevalence of long COVID, symptom patterns, work-related impact, and vaccination status among healthcare personnel in a Romanian pediatric hospital. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted in 2024 among 903 hospital employees during routine occupational health assessments. Data were collected using structured questionnaires and medical records, focusing on previous SARS-CoV-2 infection, vaccination status, persistent symptoms, and functional impact. Results: Long COVID was identified in 28.6% of participants, with excessive fatigue (53.5%), musculoskeletal pain, respiratory difficulties, and cognitive complaints being the most common symptoms. Staff with chronic comorbidities or increased exposure risk had significantly higher rates of functional impairment. Fewer reinfections were reported among vaccinated individuals; however, vaccination was not significantly associated with the presence of long COVID symptoms. Older age and comorbidities were correlated with higher risk. Conclusions: The findings underline the need for long-term occupational health strategies and individualized support programs for HCWs affected by long COVID, particularly in high-risk groups. Full article

Infectious disease outbreaks amplify the influence of stressors on psychological conditions. The purpose of this study was to analyze the disturbing influence of COVID-19 outbreak-related information and the influence of trust on the Serbian healthcare system and COVID-19 preventive measures on anxiety and depression. An anonymous online questionnaire assessing the demographic information, disturbance level and causes, and levels of anxiety and depression has been distributed to the participants, divided into student and non-student groups. The non-student group was further divided into healthcare, military, and education workers. Anxiety and depression levels, as well as the level of decreased trust in COVID-19-related preventive measures, were higher among students compared to non-students (p = 0.011). Higher anxiety and depression levels, and higher influence of the COVID-19 outbreak on those levels, were observed in education and healthcare workers, compared to military personnel. Medical doctors reported a higher level of trust in the healthcare system compared to nurses (p = 0.023). Trust in the healthcare system increased more frequently compared to the pre-vaccination period among medical doctors, compared to nurses (p = 0.040). Higher anxiety and depression and lower public trust levels in students and workers in education and the healthcare sector indicate a need to focus on these important society members during public health emergencies. Full article

Background: Breakthrough infections (BTIs) continue to occur among healthcare workers (HCWs) despite full COVID-19 vaccination, raising concerns about ongoing vulnerability in this high-risk group. In addition to initial BTIs, breakthrough reinfections (BTRs) have emerged as a challenge, with some HCWs experiencing multiple episodes of infection after vaccination. This study investigated the factors influencing breakthrough infection and reinfection rates among HCWs between January 2021 and December 2022 in Davao City, Philippines. Methods: This retrospective cohort study was conducted using secondary data from the Davao City Epidemiological Surveillance Unit, approved by the Department of Health. This study included 1011 fully vaccinated HCWs from various congressional districts. Results: BTI was observed in all HCWs included in the study. However, BTRs varied across occupational groups: medical technologists showed the highest reinfection rate (22.37%), followed by physicians (13.48%), and nurses/nurse aides (10.14%). Booster vaccination significantly reduced BTRs (5.83% vs. 11.18%, p = 0.0267). Occupation and institutional type were significant factors, with higher rates reported by physicians and in public hospitals (p = 0.0002 and p = 0.0041, respectively). The vaccine manufacturer, sex, age, and booster type showed no significant differences. Conclusion: These findings highlight the importance of targeted interventions for high-risk HCWs and emphasize the effectiveness of the booster vaccination. Full article

Background/Objectives: The SARS-CoV-2 pandemic challenged patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) under immunosuppressive therapies. We used data from the RisCoin cohort to investigate factors associated with a poor immune response to mRNA vaccination in these patients. Methods: From 4115 RisCoin participants, we matched 110 IBD patients by age and time interval since the second mRNA vaccination with 306 healthcare workers (HCW) without comorbidities (HCW-healthy) and 292 with medical conditions (HCW-plus); all were SARS-CoV-2 infection naïve. Basic questionnaires collected data on medication, COVID-19 vaccinations and side-effects, dietary patterns, lifestyle factors, and self-perceived stress. Main outcomes included anti-spike immunoglobulin levels and antibody-mediated live-virus neutralization immunity (NT) to the Omicron BA.1 variant (threshold NT ≥ 10 defined as IC50 values ≥1:10 serum dilution) after the second (baseline) and third vaccinations. Results: At baseline, IBD patients treated with anti-TNF but not those under vedolizumab or ustekinumab therapy had lower anti-spike levels compared to HCW-healthy and HCW-plus (166 versus 1384 and 1258 BAU/mL, respectively; p < 0.0001). Anti-TNF compared to vedolizumab/ustekinumab-treated patients reached NT titers above threshold in 17% versus 64%, respectively, and HCW-subgroups in 73% and 79% (all p < 0.0001). Current smokers showed a four to five times increased risk for non-neutralizing immunity compared to non-smokers. After the third vaccination, NT titers did not reach threshold in 15% anti-TNF compared to 5% vedolizumab/ustekinumab-treated patients and none of HCW (p < 0.01). Patients with IBD reported fewer clinical symptoms after vaccination. Perceived stress was not increased. Conclusions: Our findings support individualized schedules for mRNA-based vaccines in IBD patients with different immunosuppressive therapies and enforcement of non-smoking. Full article

Background: Benzodiazepines (BZDs), commonly used to treat insomnia and anxiety, are increasingly used in Spain, raising concerns due to their potential for abuse and dependence. This study investigates the use of BZDs and other psychotropic medications among healthcare workers, exploring their prevalence, associated factors, and their relationship with mental health issues following the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods: An anonymous online survey was conducted among healthcare workers at the Salamanca University Healthcare Complex (CAUSA) from March 2023 to January 2024. Of 1121 participants, 685 provided complete responses, which were analysed. Insomnia, anxiety, and depression were assessed using the Insomnia Severity Index (ISI) and Patient Health Questionnaire-4 (PHQ-4). Results: Of the respondents, 23.8% reported using sleep medication, with 27.8% doing so without a prescription. Additionally, 14.7% used medication for depression or anxiety, with only 0.6% without a prescription. Hypnotic medicine use was associated with older age, insomnia, anxiety, depression, psychological or psychiatric treatment, COVID-19 after-effects, and diagnosed sleep disorders. Night-shift work was associated with increased hypnotic medication use in men but not in women. The use of these medications was linked to a reduced quality of life and impaired work performance. Conclusions: The use of BZD and self-medication are prevalent among healthcare professionals, exceeding the rates observed in the general population. These findings highlight the urgent need for targeted interventions to address psychotropic medication use, promote other pharmacological and non-pharmacological alternatives for insomnia, and enhance mental health support for this vulnerable population. Full article