Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (52)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = Bioenergy with Carbon Capture and Storage

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
18 pages, 1311 KB  
Article
Thermo-Energetic Analysis of Electrolytic Oxygen Valorization via Biomass Oxy-Fuel Combustion: A Case Study Applied to a Power-to-Liquid Route for Methanol Synthesis
by Flávio S. Pereira, Argimiro R. Secchi and Alexandre Szklo
Thermo 2025, 5(4), 41; https://doi.org/10.3390/thermo5040041 - 7 Oct 2025
Viewed by 411
Abstract
The decarbonization of hard-to-defossilize sectors, such as international maritime transport, requires innovative, and at times disruptive, energy solutions that combine efficiency, scalability, and climate benefits. Therefore, power-to-liquid (PtL) routes have stood out for their potential to use low-emission electricity for the production of [...] Read more.
The decarbonization of hard-to-defossilize sectors, such as international maritime transport, requires innovative, and at times disruptive, energy solutions that combine efficiency, scalability, and climate benefits. Therefore, power-to-liquid (PtL) routes have stood out for their potential to use low-emission electricity for the production of synthetic fuels, via electrolytic hydrogen and CO2 capture. However, the high energy demand inherent to these routes poses significant challenges to large-scale implementation. Moreover, PtL routes are usually at most neutral in terms of CO2 emissions. This study evaluates, from a thermo-energetic perspective, the optimization potential of an e-methanol synthesis route through integration with a biomass oxy-fuel combustion process, making use of electrolytic oxygen as the oxidizing agent and the captured CO2 as the carbon source. From the standpoint of a first-law thermodynamic analysis, mass and energy balances were developed considering the full oxygen supply for oxy-fuel combustion to be met through alkaline electrolysis, thus eliminating the energy penalty associated with conventional oxygen production via air separation units. The balance closure was based on a small-scale plant with a capacity of around 100 kta of methanol. In this integrated configuration, additional CO2 surpluses beyond methanol synthesis demand can be directed to geological storage, which, when combined with bioenergy with carbon capture and storage (BECCS) strategies, may lead to net negative CO2 emissions. The results demonstrate that electrolytic oxygen valorization is a promising pathway to enhance the efficiency and climate performance of PtL processes. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

8 pages, 176 KB  
Editorial
Bridging Bioenergy and Artificial Intelligence for Sustainable Technological Synergies
by Oraléou Sangué Djandja and Quan (Sophia) He
Energies 2025, 18(19), 5293; https://doi.org/10.3390/en18195293 - 7 Oct 2025
Viewed by 444
Abstract
Biomass represents the world’s largest renewable energy source, providing heat, power, transportation fuels, and feedstock for chemicals and materials while also holding potential for negative emissions through bioenergy with carbon capture and storage [...] Full article
(This article belongs to the Section F5: Artificial Intelligence and Smart Energy)
37 pages, 3755 KB  
Review
Comparative Performance Analysis of Bioenergy with Carbon Capture and Storage (BECCS) Technologies
by Letizia Cretarola and Federico Viganò
Energies 2025, 18(18), 4800; https://doi.org/10.3390/en18184800 - 9 Sep 2025
Viewed by 636
Abstract
This study presents a comprehensive performance assessment of combustion-based options for Bioenergy with Carbon Capture and Storage (BECCS), widely regarded as key enablers of future climate neutrality. From 972 publications (2000–2025), 16 sources are identified as providing complete data. Seven technologies are considered: [...] Read more.
This study presents a comprehensive performance assessment of combustion-based options for Bioenergy with Carbon Capture and Storage (BECCS), widely regarded as key enablers of future climate neutrality. From 972 publications (2000–2025), 16 sources are identified as providing complete data. Seven technologies are considered: Calcium Looping (CaL), Chemical Looping Combustion (CLC), Hot Potassium Carbonate (HPC), low-temperature solvents (mainly amine-based), molten sorbents, Molten Carbonate Fuel Cells (MCFCs), and oxyfuel. First- and second-law efficiencies are reported for 53 bioenergy configurations (19 reference plants without carbon capture and 34 BECCS systems). Performance is primarily evaluated via the reduction in second-law (exergy) efficiency and the Specific Primary Energy Consumption per CO2 Avoided (SPECCA), both relative to each configuration’s reference plant. MCFC-based systems perform best, followed by CLC; molten sorbents and oxyfuel also show very good performance, although each is documented by a single source. Low-temperature solvents span a wide performance range—from poor to competitive—highlighting the heterogeneity of this category; HPC performs in line with the average of low-temperature solvents. CaL exhibits modest efficiency penalties alongside appreciable energy costs of CO2 capture, a counterintuitive outcome driven by the high performance of the benchmark plants considered in the definition of SPECCA. To account for BECCS-specific features (multiple outputs and peculiar fuels), a dedicated evaluation framework with a revised SPECCA formulation is introduced. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

48 pages, 4145 KB  
Review
A Review on the State-of-the-Art and Commercial Status of Carbon Capture Technologies
by Md Hujjatul Islam and Shashank Reddy Patlolla
Energies 2025, 18(15), 3937; https://doi.org/10.3390/en18153937 - 23 Jul 2025
Viewed by 1723
Abstract
Carbon capture technologies are largely considered to play a crucial role in meeting the climate change and global warming target set by Net Zero Emission (NZE) 2050. These technologies can contribute to clean energy transitions and emissions reduction by decarbonizing the power sector [...] Read more.
Carbon capture technologies are largely considered to play a crucial role in meeting the climate change and global warming target set by Net Zero Emission (NZE) 2050. These technologies can contribute to clean energy transitions and emissions reduction by decarbonizing the power sector and other CO2 intensive industries such as iron and steel production, natural gas processing oil refining and cement production where there is no obvious alternative to carbon capture technologies. While the progress of carbon capture technologies has fallen behind expectations in the past, in recent years there has been substantial growth in this area, with over 700 projects at various stages of development. Moreover, there are around 45 commercial carbon capture facilities already in operation around the world in different industrial processes, fuel transformation and power generation. Carbon capture technologies including pre/post-combustion, oxyfuel and chemical looping combustion have been widely exploited in the recent years at different Technology Readiness level (TRL). Although, a large number of review studies are available addressing different carbon capture strategies, however, studies related to the commercial status of the carbon capture technologies are yet to be conducted. In this review article, we summarize the state-of-the-art of different carbon capture technologies applied to different emission sources, focusing on emission reduction, net-zero emission, and negative emission. We also highlight the commercial status of the different carbon capture technologies including economics, opportunities, and challenges. Full article
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

17 pages, 1610 KB  
Article
The Role of Carbon Removal in Ratcheting India’s Net-Zero Goal
by Ayomide Titus Ogungbemi and Mustafa Dagbasi
Sustainability 2025, 17(12), 5632; https://doi.org/10.3390/su17125632 - 18 Jun 2025
Viewed by 880
Abstract
India’s revised nationally determined contribution at COP26 set a net-zero target for 2070, but the role of carbon dioxide removal (CDR) in achieving this goal remains unclear. This study quantifies the contribution of land-based CDR—bioenergy carbon capture and storage, biochar, and afforestation—in achieving [...] Read more.
India’s revised nationally determined contribution at COP26 set a net-zero target for 2070, but the role of carbon dioxide removal (CDR) in achieving this goal remains unclear. This study quantifies the contribution of land-based CDR—bioenergy carbon capture and storage, biochar, and afforestation—in achieving India’s net-zero goal. Additionally, a stylised scenario explores an accelerated net-zero target by 2050 in India`s climate target. The global emission target is modelled to follow India’s climate ambition in both stylised scenarios. The results show that the ambitious 2050 net-zero pathway requires 56 GtCO2 of cumulative novel CDR across the century, compared to 47 GtCO2 under the 2070 scenario, with both requiring around 1 GtCO2/year at net-zero. A higher ambitious pathway leads to increased economic costs, with a mid-century carbon price of USD 938, compared to USD 174 in the 2070 scenario. Without novel CDR methods, the cost of achieving net zero by 2050 quadruple. The accelerated 2050 net-zero pathway also intensifies land and water trade-offs, reducing land for crop production while increasing water demand for electricity and biomass. Despite these challenges, it limits end-of-century warming to 1.46 °C, compared to 1.79 °C under the 2070 scenario. These findings highlight the importance of clearly defined climate targets, scalable CDR strategies, and integrated resource management to balance climate ambition with sustainable development. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

26 pages, 2558 KB  
Article
Biogenic CO2 Emissions in the EU Biofuel and Bioenergy Sector: Mapping Sources, Regional Trends, and Pathways for Capture and Utilisation
by Diogenis Christianides, Dimitra Antonia Bagaki, Rudolphus Antonius Timmers, Maja Berden Zrimec, Anastasia Theodoropoulou, Irini Angelidaki, Panagiotis Kougias, Guido Zampieri, Najla Kamergi, Alfredo Napoli, Dimitris Malamis, Sofia Mai and Elli Maria Barampouti
Energies 2025, 18(6), 1345; https://doi.org/10.3390/en18061345 - 10 Mar 2025
Cited by 6 | Viewed by 2982
Abstract
The European biofuel and bioenergy industry faces increasing challenges in achieving sustainable energy production while meeting carbon neutrality targets. This study provides a detailed analysis of biogenic emissions from biofuel and bioenergy production, with a focus on key sectors such as biogas, biomethane, [...] Read more.
The European biofuel and bioenergy industry faces increasing challenges in achieving sustainable energy production while meeting carbon neutrality targets. This study provides a detailed analysis of biogenic emissions from biofuel and bioenergy production, with a focus on key sectors such as biogas, biomethane, bioethanol, syngas, biomass combustion, and biomass pyrolysis. Over 18,000 facilities were examined, including their feedstocks, production processes, and associated greenhouse gas emissions. The results highlight forestry residues as the predominant feedstock and expose significant disparities in infrastructure and technology adoption across EU Member States. While countries like Sweden and Germany lead in emissions management and carbon capture through bioenergy production with carbon capture and storage systems (BECCS), other regions face deficiencies in bioenergy infrastructure. The findings underscore the potential of BECCS and similar carbon management technologies to achieve negative emissions and support the European Green Deal’s climate neutrality goals. This work serves as a resource for policymakers, industry leaders, and researchers, fostering informed strategies for the sustainable advancement of the biofuels sector. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Carbon Capture Technologies for Sustainable Energy Production)
Show Figures

Figure 1

29 pages, 1445 KB  
Review
Algal-Based Carbonaceous Materials for Environmental Remediation: Advances in Wastewater Treatment, Carbon Sequestration, and Biofuel Applications
by Lázaro Adrián González Fernández, Nahum Andrés Medellín Castillo, Manuel Sánchez Polo, Amado Enrique Navarro Frómeta and Javier Ernesto Vilasó Cadre
Processes 2025, 13(2), 556; https://doi.org/10.3390/pr13020556 - 16 Feb 2025
Cited by 10 | Viewed by 2385
Abstract
Water pollution from industrial, municipal, and agricultural sources is a pressing global concern, necessitating the development of sustainable and efficient treatment solutions. Algal biomass has emerged as a promising feedstock for the production of carbonaceous adsorbents due to its rapid growth, high photosynthetic [...] Read more.
Water pollution from industrial, municipal, and agricultural sources is a pressing global concern, necessitating the development of sustainable and efficient treatment solutions. Algal biomass has emerged as a promising feedstock for the production of carbonaceous adsorbents due to its rapid growth, high photosynthetic efficiency, and ability to thrive in wastewater. This review examines the conversion of algal biomass into biochar and hydrochar through pyrolysis and hydrothermal processes, respectively, and evaluates their potential applications in wastewater treatment, carbon sequestration, and biofuel production. Pyrolyzed algal biochars typically exhibit a moderate to high carbon content and a porous structure but require activation treatments (e.g., KOH or ZnCl2) to enhance their surface area and adsorption capabilities. Hydrothermal carbonization, conducted at lower temperatures (180–260 °C), produces hydrochars rich in oxygenated functional groups with enhanced cation exchange capacities, making them effective for pollutant removal. Algal-derived biochars and hydrochars have been successfully applied for the adsorption of heavy metals, dyes, and pharmaceutical contaminants, with adsorption capacities significantly increasing through post-treatment modifications. Beyond wastewater treatment, algal biochars serve as effective carbon sequestration materials due to their stable structure and high carbon retention. Their application as soil amendments enhances long-term carbon storage and improves soil fertility. Additionally, algal biomass plays a key role in biofuel production, particularly for biodiesel synthesis, where microalgae’s high lipid content facilitates bio-oil generation. Hydrochars, with energy values in the range of 20–26 MJ/kg, are viable solid fuels for combustion and co-firing, supporting renewable energy generation. Furthermore, the integration of these materials into bioenergy systems allows for waste valorization, pollution control, and energy recovery, contributing to a sustainable circular economy. This review provides a comprehensive analysis of algal-derived biochars and hydrochars, emphasizing their physicochemical properties, adsorption performance, and post-treatment modifications. It explores their feasibility for large-scale wastewater remediation, carbon capture, and bioenergy applications, addressing current challenges and future research directions. By advancing the understanding of algal biomass as a multifunctional resource, this study highlights its potential for environmental sustainability and energy innovation. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

21 pages, 1704 KB  
Article
Applications of Renewable Energies in Low-Temperature Regions: A Scientometric Analysis of Recent Advancements and Future Research Directions
by César Rodríguez-Aburto, José Poma-García, Jorge Montaño-Pisfil, Pablo Morcillo-Valdivia, Roberto Solís-Farfán, José Curay-Tribeño, Alex Pilco-Nuñez, José Flores-Salinas, Freddy Tineo-Cordova, Paul Virú-Vasquez and Luigi Bravo-Toledo
Energies 2025, 18(4), 904; https://doi.org/10.3390/en18040904 - 13 Feb 2025
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 1314
Abstract
This study presents a scientometric analysis of renewable energy applications in low-temperature regions, focusing on green hydrogen production, carbon storage, and emerging trends. Using bibliometric tools such as RStudio and VOSviewer, the research evaluates publication trends from 1988 to 2024, revealing an exponential [...] Read more.
This study presents a scientometric analysis of renewable energy applications in low-temperature regions, focusing on green hydrogen production, carbon storage, and emerging trends. Using bibliometric tools such as RStudio and VOSviewer, the research evaluates publication trends from 1988 to 2024, revealing an exponential growth in renewable energy studies post-2021, driven by global policies promoting carbon neutrality. Life cycle assessment (LCA) plays a crucial role in evaluating the environmental impact of energy systems, underscoring the need to integrate renewable sources for emission reduction. Hydrogen production via electrolysis has emerged as a key solution in decarbonizing hard-to-abate sectors, while carbon storage technologies, such as bioenergy with carbon capture and storage (BECCS), are gaining traction. Government policies, including carbon taxes, fossil fuel phase-out strategies, and renewable energy subsidies, significantly shape the energy transition in cold regions by incentivizing low-carbon alternatives. Multi-objective optimization techniques, leveraging artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning, are expected to enhance decision-making processes, optimizing energy efficiency, reliability, and economic feasibility in renewable energy systems. Future research must address three critical challenges: (1) strengthening policy frameworks and financial incentives for large-scale renewable energy deployment, (2) advancing energy storage, hydrogen production, and hybrid energy systems, and (3) integrating multi-objective optimization approaches to enhance cost-effectiveness and resilience in extreme climates. It is expected that the research will contribute to the field of knowledge regarding renewable energy applications in low-temperature regions. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section B: Energy and Environment)
Show Figures

Figure 1

36 pages, 2386 KB  
Review
A Review of Algae-Based Carbon Capture, Utilization, and Storage (Algae-Based CCUS)
by Guihe Li and Jia Yao
Gases 2024, 4(4), 468-503; https://doi.org/10.3390/gases4040024 - 2 Dec 2024
Cited by 21 | Viewed by 19781
Abstract
Excessive emissions of greenhouse gases, primarily carbon dioxide (CO2), have garnered worldwide attention due to their significant environmental impacts. Carbon capture, utilization, and storage (CCUS) techniques have emerged as effective solutions to address CO2 emissions. Recently, direct air capture (DAC) [...] Read more.
Excessive emissions of greenhouse gases, primarily carbon dioxide (CO2), have garnered worldwide attention due to their significant environmental impacts. Carbon capture, utilization, and storage (CCUS) techniques have emerged as effective solutions to address CO2 emissions. Recently, direct air capture (DAC) and bioenergy with carbon capture and storage (BECCS) have been advanced within the CCUS framework as negative emission technologies. BECCS, which involves cultivating biomass for energy production, then capturing and storing the resultant CO2 emissions, offers cost advantages over DAC. Algae-based CCUS is integral to the BECCS framework, leveraging algae’s biological processes to capture and sequester CO2 while simultaneously contributing to energy production and potentially achieving net negative carbon emissions. Algae’s high photosynthetic efficiency, rapid growth rates, and ability to grow in non-arable environments provide significant advantages over other BECCS methods. This comprehensive review explores recent innovations in algae-based CCUS technologies, focusing on the mechanisms of carbon capture, utilization, and storage through algae. It highlights advancements in algae cultivation for efficient carbon capture, algae-based biofuel production, and algae-based dual carbon storage materials, as well as key challenges that need to be addressed for further optimization. This review provides valuable insights into the potential of algae-based CCUS as a key component of global carbon reduction strategies. Full article
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

21 pages, 2072 KB  
Article
Optimization and Tradeoff Analysis for Multiple Configurations of Bio-Energy with Carbon Capture and Storage Systems in Brazilian Sugarcane Ethanol Sector
by Bruno Bunya, César A. R. Sotomonte, Alisson Aparecido Vitoriano Julio, João Luiz Junho Pereira, Túlio Augusto Zucareli de Souza, Matheus Brendon Francisco and Christian J. R. Coronado
Entropy 2024, 26(8), 698; https://doi.org/10.3390/e26080698 - 17 Aug 2024
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 2065
Abstract
Bio-energy systems with carbon capture and storage (BECCS) will be essential if countries are to meet the gas emission reduction targets established in the 2015 Paris Agreement. This study seeks to carry out a thermodynamic optimization and analysis of a BECCS technology for [...] Read more.
Bio-energy systems with carbon capture and storage (BECCS) will be essential if countries are to meet the gas emission reduction targets established in the 2015 Paris Agreement. This study seeks to carry out a thermodynamic optimization and analysis of a BECCS technology for a typical Brazilian cogeneration plant. To maximize generated net electrical energy (MWe) and carbon dioxide CO2 capture (Mt/year), this study evaluated six cogeneration systems integrated with a chemical absorption process using MEA. A key performance indicator (gCO2/kWh) was also evaluated. The set of optimal solutions shows that the single regenerator configuration (REG1) resulted in more CO2 capture (51.9% of all CO2 emissions generated by the plant), penalized by 14.9% in the electrical plant’s efficiency. On the other hand, the reheated configuration with three regenerators (Reheat3) was less power-penalized (7.41%) but had a lower CO2 capture rate (36.3%). Results showed that if the CO2 capture rates would be higher than 51.9%, the cogeneration system would reach a higher specific emission (gCO2/kWh) than the cogeneration base plant without a carbon capture system, which implies that low capture rates (<51%) in the CCS system guarantee an overall net reduction in greenhouse gas emissions in sugarcane plants for power and ethanol production. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Thermodynamic Optimization of Industrial Energy Systems)
Show Figures

Figure 1

17 pages, 3730 KB  
Article
Biodegradation of Crude Oil by Nitrate-Reducing, Sulfate-Reducing, and Methanogenic Microbial Communities under High-Pressure Conditions
by Lu Wang, Yong Nie, Xinglong Chen, Jinbo Xu, Zemin Ji, Wenfeng Song, Xiaofang Wei, Xinmin Song and Xiao-Lei Wu
Microorganisms 2024, 12(8), 1543; https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms12081543 - 27 Jul 2024
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 2046
Abstract
Carbon capture, utilization, and storage (CCUS) is an important component in many national net-zero strategies, and ensuring that CO2 can be safely and economically stored in geological systems is critical. Recent discoveries have shown that microbial processes (e.g., methanogenesis) can modify fluid [...] Read more.
Carbon capture, utilization, and storage (CCUS) is an important component in many national net-zero strategies, and ensuring that CO2 can be safely and economically stored in geological systems is critical. Recent discoveries have shown that microbial processes (e.g., methanogenesis) can modify fluid composition and fluid dynamics within the storage reservoir. Oil reservoirs are under high pressure, but the influence of pressure on the petroleum microbial community has been previously overlooked. To better understand microbial community dynamics in deep oil reservoirs, we designed an experiment to examine the effect of high pressure (12 megapascals [MPa], 60 °C) on nitrate-reducing, sulfate-reducing, and methanogenic enrichment cultures. Cultures were exposed to these conditions for 90 d and compared with a control exposed to atmospheric pressure (0.1 MPa, 60 °C). The degradation characteristic oil compounds were confirmed by thin-layer analysis of oil SARA (saturates, aromatics, resins, and asphaltenes) family component rods. We found that the asphaltene component in crude oil was biodegraded under high pressure, but the concentration of asphaltenes increased under atmospheric pressure. Gas chromatography analyses of saturates showed that short-chain saturates (C8–C12) were biodegraded under high and atmospheric pressure, especially in the methanogenic enrichment culture under high pressure (the ratio of change was −81%), resulting in an increased relative abundance of medium- and long-chain saturates. In the nitrate-reducing and sulfate-reducing enrichment cultures, long-chain saturates (C22–C32) were biodegraded in cultures exposed to high-pressure and anaerobic conditions, with a ratio of change of −8.0% and −2.3%, respectively. However, the relative proportion of long-chain saturates (C22–C32) increased under atmospheric pressure. Gas Chromatography Mass Spectrometry analyses of aromatics showed that several naphthalene series compounds (naphthalene, C1-naphthalene, and C2-naphthalene) were biodegraded in the sulfate-reducing enrichment under both atmospheric pressure and high pressure. Our study has discerned the linkages between the biodegradation characteristics of crude oil and pressures, which is important for the future application of bioenergy with CCUS (bio-CCUS). Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue State-of-the-Art Environmental Microbiology in China (2023–2024))
Show Figures

Figure 1

21 pages, 2658 KB  
Article
Energetic, Exergetic, and Techno-Economic Analysis of A Bioenergy with Carbon Capture and Utilization Process via Integrated Torrefaction–CLC–Methanation
by Enrico Alberto Cutillo, Claudio Tregambi, Piero Bareschino, Erasmo Mancusi, Gaetano Continillo and Francesco Pepe
Energies 2024, 17(11), 2690; https://doi.org/10.3390/en17112690 - 1 Jun 2024
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 1846
Abstract
Bioenergy with carbon capture and storage (BECCS) or utilization (BECCU) allows net zero or negative carbon emissions and can be a breakthrough technology for climate change mitigation. This work consists of an energetic, exergetic, and economic analysis of an integrated process based on [...] Read more.
Bioenergy with carbon capture and storage (BECCS) or utilization (BECCU) allows net zero or negative carbon emissions and can be a breakthrough technology for climate change mitigation. This work consists of an energetic, exergetic, and economic analysis of an integrated process based on chemical looping combustion of solar-torrefied agro-industrial residues, followed by methanation of the concentrated CO2 stream with green H2. Four agro-industrial residues and four Italian site locations are considered. Depending on the considered biomass, the integrated plant processes about 18–93 kg h−1 of raw biomass and produces 55–70 t y−1 of synthetic methane. Global exergetic efficiencies ranged within 45–60% and 67–77% when neglecting and considering, respectively, the valorization of torgas. Sugar beet pulp and grape marc required a non-negligible input exergy flow for the torrefaction, due to the high moisture content of the raw biomasses. However, for these biomasses, the water released during drying/torrefaction and CO2 methanation could be recycled to the electrolyzer to eliminate external water consumption, thus allowing for a more sustainable use of water resources. For olive stones and hemp hurd, this water recycling brings, instead, a reduction of approximately 65% in water needs. A round-trip electric efficiency of 28% was estimated assuming an electric conversion efficiency of 40%. According to the economic analysis, the total plant costs ranged within 3–5 M€ depending on the biomass and site location considered. The levelized cost of methane (LCOM) ranged within 4.3–8.9 € kgCH4−1 but, if implementing strategies to avoid the use of a large temporary H2 storage vessel, can be decreased to 2.6–5.3 € kgCH4−1. Lower values are obtained when considering hemp hurd and grape marc as raw biomasses, and when locating the PV field in the south of Italy. Even in the best scenario, values of LCOM are out of the market if compared to current natural gas prices, but they might become competitive with the introduction of a carbon tax or through government incentives for the purchase of the PV field and/or electrolyzer. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section A: Sustainable Energy)
Show Figures

Figure 1

20 pages, 3502 KB  
Review
Review on Mercury Control during Co-Firing Coal and Biomass under O2/CO2 Atmosphere
by Qiang Lyu and Fei Xin
Appl. Sci. 2024, 14(10), 4209; https://doi.org/10.3390/app14104209 - 16 May 2024
Cited by 3 | Viewed by 2338
Abstract
Combining biomass co-firing with oxy-fuel combustion is a promising Bioenergy with Carbon Capture and Storage (BECCS) technology. It has the potential to achieve a large-scale reduction in carbon emissions from traditional power plants, making it a powerful tool for addressing global climate change. [...] Read more.
Combining biomass co-firing with oxy-fuel combustion is a promising Bioenergy with Carbon Capture and Storage (BECCS) technology. It has the potential to achieve a large-scale reduction in carbon emissions from traditional power plants, making it a powerful tool for addressing global climate change. However, mercury in the fuel can be released into the flue gas during combustion, posing a significant threat to the environment and human health. More importantly, mercury can also cause the fracture of metal equipment via amalgamation, which is a major risk for the system. Therefore, compared to conventional coal-fired power plants, the requirements for the mercury concentration in BECCS systems are much stricter. This article reviews the latest progress in mercury control under oxy-fuel biomass co-firing conditions, clarifies the impact of biomass co-firing on mercury species transformation, reveals the influence mechanisms of various flue gas components on elemental mercury oxidation under oxy-fuel combustion conditions, evaluates the advantages and disadvantages of various mercury removal methods, and finally provides an outlook for mercury control in BECCS systems. Research shows that after biomass co-firing, the concentrations of chlorine and alkali metals in the flue gas increase, which is beneficial for homogeneous and heterogeneous mercury oxidation. The changes in the particulate matter content could affect the transformation of gaseous mercury to particulate mercury. The high concentrations of CO2 and H2O in oxy-fuel flue gas inhibit mercury oxidation, while the effects of NOx and SO2 are dual-sided. Higher concentrations of fly ash in oxy-fuel flue gas are conducive to the removal of Hg0. Additionally, under oxy-fuel conditions, CO2 and metal ions such as Fe2+ can inhibit the re-emission of mercury in WFGD systems. The development of efficient adsorbents and catalysts is the key to achieving deep mercury removal. Fully utilizing the advantages of chlorine, alkali metals, and CO2 in oxy-fuel biomass co-firing flue gas will be the future focus of deep mercury removal from BECCS systems. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

17 pages, 3871 KB  
Article
Requirement on the Capacity of Energy Storage to Meet the 2 °C Goal
by Yifei Deng, Yijing Wang, Xiaofan Xing, Yuankang Xiong, Siqing Xu and Rong Wang
Sustainability 2024, 16(9), 3753; https://doi.org/10.3390/su16093753 - 30 Apr 2024
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1951
Abstract
The inherent power fluctuations of wind, photovoltaic (PV) and bioenergy with carbon capture and storage (BECCS) create a temporal mismatch between energy supply and demand. This mismatch could lead to a potential resurgence of fossil fuels, offsetting the effects of decarbonization and affecting [...] Read more.
The inherent power fluctuations of wind, photovoltaic (PV) and bioenergy with carbon capture and storage (BECCS) create a temporal mismatch between energy supply and demand. This mismatch could lead to a potential resurgence of fossil fuels, offsetting the effects of decarbonization and affecting the realization of the Paris target by limiting global warming to below 2 °C in the 21st century. While application of energy storage is widely recommended to address this limitation, there is a research gap to quantify the impacts of energy storage limitation on global warming. Here, we analyzed the hourly variation of global wind and PV power during the period 1981–2020 and the monthly capacity of biomass production in 2019, and thus quantified the impact of decreasing the capacity of energy storage on global warming using a state-of-the-art Earth system model. We found that global warming by 2100 in the SSP1-2.6 scenario would increase by about 20% and exceed 2 °C without deploying energy storage facilities. Achieving the 2 °C target requires reducing power losses of wind and PV by at least 30% through energy storage. This requirement delivers to a cumulative storage capacity of 16.46 TWh using batteries during the period 2021–2100, leading to the international trade of cobalt and manganese across countries due to deficits of minerals at a country level. In the context of energy security, we highlight the importance of considering the limitations of energy storage and mineral shortage in the forthcoming policies of decarbonization. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

15 pages, 1065 KB  
Article
The Case for Carbon Capture and Storage Technologies
by Gal Hochman and Vijay Appasamy
Environments 2024, 11(3), 52; https://doi.org/10.3390/environments11030052 - 8 Mar 2024
Cited by 6 | Viewed by 5457
Abstract
In this paper, we use the literature to help us better understand carbon capture costs and how these estimates fare against those of avoided costs, focusing on bioenergy carbon capture and storage (BECCS), carbon capture and storage (CCS), as well as direct air [...] Read more.
In this paper, we use the literature to help us better understand carbon capture costs and how these estimates fare against those of avoided costs, focusing on bioenergy carbon capture and storage (BECCS), carbon capture and storage (CCS), as well as direct air capture technologies. We approach these questions from a meta-analysis perspective. The analysis uses meta-analysis tools while applying them to numerical rather than statistical studies. Our analysis shows that avoided costs are, on average, 17.4% higher than capture costs and that the carbon intensity of the feedstock matters: the estimates for coal-based electricity generation capture costs are statistically smaller than those for natural gas or air. From a policy perspective, the literature suggests that the costs of CCS are like the 45Q subsidy of USD 50 per metric ton of carbon captured. Full article
(This article belongs to the Topic CO2 Capture and Renewable Energy)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop