Search Results (12)

Breast cancer (BC) is the most prevalent malignancy in women worldwide. Despite most cases being diagnosed in the early stages, patients typically require a multimodal treatment approach. This typically involves a combination of surgery, radiotherapy, systemic treatments (including chemotherapy or immunotherapy), targeted therapy, and endocrine therapy, depending on the disease subtype and the risk of recurrence. Moreover, patients with BC and germline mutations in the breast cancer genes 1 or 2 (BRCA1/BRCA2), (gBRCAm), who are typically young women, often require more aggressive therapeutic interventions. These mutations present unique characteristics that necessitate a distinct treatment approach, potentially influencing the side effect profiles of patients with BC. Regardless of the clear benefit observed with these treatments in terms of reduced recurrence and mortality rates, long-term, treatment-related adverse events occur that negatively affect the health-related quality of life (HRQoL) of BC survivors. Thus, long-term adverse events need to be factored into the treatment decision algorithm of patients with early BC (eBC). Physical, functional, emotional, and psychosocial adverse events can occur and represent a significant concern and a challenge for clinicians, patients, and their families. This review article provides an overview of the various long-term adverse events that patients with eBC may experience, including their associated risk factors, as well as management and prevention strategies. We also explore the evidence of the long-term impact of treatment on the HRQoL of patients with gBRCAm. By providing a comprehensive overview of current evidence and recommendations regarding patients’ HRQoL, we aim to equip clinicians with scientific and clinical knowledge and provide guidance to optimize care and improve long-term outcomes. Full article

PARP inhibitors (PARPi), alone or in combination with androgen receptor signaling inhibitors (ARSi), have shown clinical benefit in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC), particularly in tumors with homologous recombination repair (HRR) gene alterations. Recent data from the TALAPRO-2 trial complete the current evidence on PARPi–ARSi combination strategies in this setting. Background/Objectives: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of PARPi-based therapies—monotherapy and combination with ARSi—in patients with mCRPC, focusing on molecular subgroups defined by DNA repair alterations. Methods: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of phase III randomized controlled trials (RCTs) assessing PARPi as monotherapy or in combination with ARSi. Searches were performed in PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, and oncology conference proceedings up to February 2025. Outcomes included radiographic progression-free survival (rPFS), overall survival (OS), second progression-free survival (PFS2), and grade ≥3 adverse events (AEs). Data were pooled using a random-effects model, with subgroup analyses by DNA repair status. Results: Five RCTs (n = 2921) were I confirmincluded: three on combination therapy (n = 2271) and two on monotherapy (n = 650). Combination therapy improved rPFS in the ITT (HR = 0.64; 95% CI: 0.56–0.74), HRRm (HR = 0.55; 95% CI: 0.44–0.68), and BRCAm (HR = 0.33; 95% CI: 0.18–0.58) subgroups. OS was also improved in the ITT (HR = 0.80; 95% CI: 0.70–0.92), HRRm (HR = 0.68; 95% CI: 0.55–0.83), and BRCAm (HR = 0.54; 95% CI: 0.34–0.85) groups. No benefit was observed in non-HRRm patients. PFS2 favored combination therapy (HR = 0.77; 95% CI: 0.64–0.91). Grade ≥3 AEs were more frequent (RR = 1.44; 95% CI: 1.20–1.73). Monotherapy improved rPFS in ITT (HR = 0.46; 95% CI: 0.20–0.81) and BRCAm (HR = 0.33; 95% CI: 0.15–0.75); OS benefit was seen only in BRCAm (HR = 0.73; 95% CI: 0.57–0.95). Conclusions: PARPi therapies improve outcomes mainly in HRR- and BRCA-mutated mCRPC. Molecular selection is key to optimizing benefit and minimizing toxicity. Further research on the activity of PARPi combinations in non-HRR mutated mCRPC is needed to better understand the underlying mechanisms of efficacy. Full article

Background/Objectives: Mutations in BRCA1 and/or BRCA2 (BRCAm) and other homologous recombination repair genes (HRRm) are associated with several cancers. We evaluated the prevalence and association with overall survival (OS) of somatic BRCAm and HRRm among patients with advanced solid tumors. Methods: We used deidentified data from the AACR GENIE Biopharma Collaborative dataset derived from patients with tumors genotyped using next-generation sequencing between 1 January 2014 and 31 December 2017. Eligible patients were aged ≥18 years diagnosed with non-small-cell lung, colorectal, breast, bladder, prostate, or pancreatic cancer, with documented BRCA/HRR somatic mutation status. The primary analysis was OS (censored at the start of poly[ADP ribose] polymerase inhibitors [PARPi]/immunotherapy) after initiation of second-line therapy since most patients had sequencing after first-line therapy. Results: Among eligible patients, 242/7022 (3.4%) had BRCAm and 477/5474 (8.7%) had HRRm. Adjusted OS HRs (95% CI) for the primary analysis (using the initiation of second-line therapy as index date) were 0.79 (0.61–1.03) with/without BRCAm (n = 116/n = 3394) and 0.83 (0.69–0.99) with/without HRRm (n = 247/n = 2656); in sensitivity analysis of patients with stage IV disease, HRs were 0.97 (0.68–1.38) with/without BRCAm (n = 58/n = 1847) and 0.92 (0.73–1.18) with/without HRRm (n = 132/n = 1488). Conclusions: Overall, BRCAm and HRRm did not show a strong association with OS, with a trend toward longer OS among patients receiving standard second-line therapies excluding PARPi/immunotherapy. Full article

Background: Identifying patients with gBRCAm is crucial to facilitate screening strategies, preventive measures and the usage of targeted therapeutics in their management. This review examines the evidence for the latest predictive and therapeutic approaches in BRCA-associated cancers. Clinical Description: Data supports the use of adjuvant olaparib in patients with gBRCAm high-risk HER2-negative breast cancer. In advanced gBRCAm HER2-negative breast cancer, the PARPis talazoparib and olaparib have demonstrated benefit over standard chemotherapy. In ovarian cancer, olaparib, niraparib or rucaparib can be used as monotherapy in frontline maintenance. Olaparib and bevacizumab as a combination can also be used as frontline maintenance. In the relapsed platinum-sensitive setting, olaparib, niraparib and rucaparib are effective maintenance options in BRCAm patients who are PARPi naive. Both olaparib and rucaparib are effective options in BRCAm metastatic castrate-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). Evidence also exists for the benefit of PARPi combinations in mCRPC. In metastatic pancreatic cancer, olaparib can be used in gBRCAm patients who are responding to platinum chemotherapy. However, there may be a development of PARPi resistance. Understanding the pathophysiology that contributes to such resistance may allow the development of novel therapeutics. Combination therapy appears to have promising results in emerging trials. Seeking avenues for subsidised genetic testing can reduce the total costs of cancer management, leading to improve detection rates. Conclusion: Identifying breast, ovarian, pancreatic and prostate cancer patients with gBRCAm plays a crucial predictive role in selecting those who will benefit significantly from PARPi therapy. The use of PARPi in gBRCAm HBOC-related cancers has resulted in significant survival benefits. Beyond BRCA1/2, HRR gene assessment and the consideration of other cancer predisposition syndromes may allow more patients to be eligible for and benefit from targeted therapies. Full article

Data are scarce on the role of pathogenic germline variants in BRCA1 and BRCA2 (gBRCAm) in subtype-specific survival in young women who develop breast cancer under the age of 40. This retrospective, real-world cohort study assessed the distant disease-free survival (DDFS) and overall survival (OS) of young women diagnosed with breast cancer between 2008 and 2019 while taking into consideration the interaction of clinical subtypes and the gBRCA status. Among 473 women, HR+/Her2− was the most common subtype (49.0%), followed by TNBC (31.3%), HR+/Her2+ (13.7%), and Her2+/HR− (5.9%). The gBRCA status was known for 319 cases (gBRCAwt (wild-type – without pathogenic variants in BRCA1 or BRCA2): 204, gBRCA1m: 83, gBRCA2m: 31, 1 patient with both). The distribution of clinical subtypes varied depending on the gBRCA status (p < 0.001). In survival analysis with a median follow-up of 43 months, the unadjusted DDFS and OS were worse for gBRCAwt TNBC compared to both HR+ subtypes, but not for gBRCAm TNBC patients. T-stage, nodal involvement, and the gBRCA status were identified as significant for survival in TNBC. In TNBC, gBRCAm was associated with better DDFS and OS than gBRCAwt (5-year DDFS 81.4% vs. 54.3%, p = 0.012 and 5-year OS 96.7% vs. 62.7%, p < 0.001). In contrast, in HR+/Her2− patients, gBRCAm patients showed a tendency for worse survival, though not statistically significant. Subtype-specific survival in young women with breast cancer needs to be evaluated in interaction with the gBRCA status. For TNBC, gBRCAm is of favorable prognostic value for overall survival, while patients with gBRCAwt TNBC need to be considered to have the highest risk for adverse survival outcomes. Full article

Despite the OlympiA trial demonstrating that early-stage, high-risk, HER2- germline BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation (gBRCAm) positive breast cancer patients can benefit from PARPi in the adjuvant setting, the gBRCA testing rate in early-stage HR+/HER2− patients remains suboptimal compared to that in early-stage TNBC patients. To better understand the perceived barriers associated with gBRCA testing in HR+/HER2− disease, a quantitative survey was conducted across stakeholders (n = 430) including medical oncologists, surgeons, nurses, physician assistants, payers, and patients. This study revealed that while payers claim to cover gBRCA testing, poor clinician documentation and overutilization are key challenges. Therefore, payers place utilization management controls on gBRCA testing due to their impression that clinicians overtest. These controls have led to healthcare professionals experiencing payer pushback in the form of reimbursement limitations and denials. The perceived challenges to gBRCA testing stem from the lack of consensus dictating which patients are high risk and should be tested. While payers define high risk based on the CPS + EG score from the OlympiA trial, HCPs adopt a broader definition including genomic risk scores, lymph node involvement, and tumor grade and size. A dialogue to harmonize risk classification and testing eligibility across stakeholders is critical to address this disconnect and increase gBRCA testing in appropriate patients. Full article

Somatic/germline BRCA1/2 mutations (m)/(likely) pathogenic variants (PV) (s/gBRCAm) remain the best predictive biomarker for PARP inhibitor efficacy. As >95% of high-grade serous ovarian cancers (HGSOC) have a somatic TP53m, combined tumor-based BRCA1/2 (tBRCA) and TP53 mutation testing (tBRCA/TP53m) may improve the quality of results in somatic BRCAm identification and interpretation of the ‘second hit’ event, i.e., loss of heterozygosity (LOH). A total of 237 patients with HGSOC underwent tBRCA/TP53m testing. The ratio of allelic fractions (AFs) for tBRCA/TP53m was calculated to estimate the proportion of cells carrying BRCAm and to infer LOH. Among the 142/237 gBRCA results, 16.2% demonstrated a pathogenic/deleterious variant (DEL) gBRCA1/2m. Among the 195 contributive tumor samples, 43 DEL of tBRCAm (22.1%) were identified (23 gBRCAm and 20 sBRCAm) with LOH identified in 37/41 conclusive samples. The median AF of TP53m was 0.52 (0.01–0.93), confirming huge variability in tumor cellularity. Initially, three samples were considered as wild type with <10% cellularity. However, additional testing detected a very low AF (<0.05) in both BRCA1/2m and TP53m, thus reidentifying them as sBRCA1/2m. Combined tBRCA/TP53m testing is rapid, sensitive, and identifies somatic and germline BRCA1/2m. AF TP53m is essential for interpreting sBRCA1/2m in low-cellularity samples and provides indirect evidence for LOH as the ‘second hit’ of BRCA1/2-related tumorigenesis. Full article

Background: How molecular profiles are associated with tumor microenvironment (TME) in high-grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSOC) is incompletely understood. Therefore, we analyzed the TME and molecular profiles of HGSOC and assessed their associations with overall survival (OS). Methods: Patients with advanced-stage HGSOC treated in three Dutch hospitals between 2008–2015 were included. Patient data were collected from medical records. BRCA1/2 mutation, BRCA1 promotor methylation analyses, and copy number variations were used to define molecular profiles. Immune cells were assessed with immunohistochemical staining. Results: 348 patients were categorized as BRCA mutation (BRCAm) (BRCAm or promotor methylation) (30%), non-BRCA mutated HRD (19%), Cyclin E1 (CCNE1)-amplification (13%), non-BRCAmut HRD and CCNE1-amplification (double classifier) (20%), and no specific molecular profile (NSMP) (18%). BRCAm showed highest immune cell densities and CCNE1-amplification lowest. BRCAm showed the most favorable OS (52.5 months), compared to non-BRCAmut HRD (41.0 months), CCNE1-amplification (28.0 months), double classifier (27.8 months), and NSMP (35.4 months). Higher immune cell densities showed a favorable OS compared to lower, also within the profiles. CD8+, CD20+, and CD103+ cells remained associated with OS in multivariable analysis. Conclusions: Molecular profiles and TME are associated with OS. TME differs per profile, with higher immune cell densities showing a favorable OS, even within the profiles. HGSOC does not reflect one entity but comprises different entities based on molecular profiles and TME. Full article

This systematic review identifies, evaluates, and summarises the findings of all relevant individual studies on the prevalence of BRCA mutation (BRCAm) in endometrial cancer patients and the incidence of endometrial cancer in BRCAm women patients. Consequently, the benefits and limits of a prophylactic hysterectomy at the time of the risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy are analysed and discussed. A systematic literature search was performed in the databases of PubMed, Cochrane, and Web of Science until May 2022; 13 studies met the eligibility criteria. Overall, 1613 endometrial cancer patients from 11 cohorts were tested for BRCA1/2 mutation. BRCA1/2m were identified in 4.3% of women with endometrial cancer (70/1613). BRCA1m was the most represented (71.4%) pathogenic variant. Alongside, a total of 209 BRCAm carriers from 14 studies were diagnosed with endometrial cancer. Only 5 out of 14 studies found a correlation between BRCAm and an increased risk of endometrial cancer. Nevertheless, two studies found a statistical difference only for BRCA1m women. The present systematic review does not provide strong evidence in favour of performing routine hysterectomy at the time of risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy; however, it provides epidemiological data that can be useful for counselling patients in order to offer a tailored approach. Full article

According to clinical guidelines, the occurrence of very early-onset breast cancer (VEO-BC) (diagnosed ≤ age 30 years) or VEO ovarian cancer (VEO-OC) (diagnosed ≤ age 40 years) in families with BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation (BRCAm) prompts advancing the age of risk-reducing strategies in relatives. This study aimed to assess the relation between the occurrence of VEO-BC or VEO-OC in families with BRCAm and age at BC or OC diagnosis in relatives. We conducted a retrospective multicenter study of 448 consecutive families with BRCAm from 2003 to 2018. Mean age and 5-year–span distribution of age at BC or OC in relatives were compared in families with or without VEO-BC or VEO-OC. Conditional probability calculation and Cochran–Mantel–Haenszel chi-square tests were used to investigate early-onset cancer occurrence in relatives of VEO-BC and VEO-OC cases. Overall, 15% (19/245) of families with BRCA1m and 9% (19/203) with BRCA2m featured at least one case of VEO-BC; 8% (37/245) and 2% (2/203) featured at least one case of VEO-OC, respectively. The cumulative prevalence of VEO-BC was 5.1% (95% CI 3.6–6.6) and 2.5% (95% CI 1.4–3.6) for families with BRCA1m and BRCA2m, respectively. The distribution of age and mean age at BC diagnosis in relatives did not differ by occurrence of VEO-BC for families with BRCA1m or BRCA2m. Conditional probability calculations did not show an increase of early-onset BC in VEO-BC families with BRCA1m or BRCA2m. Conversely, the probability of VEO-BC was not increased in families with early-onset BC. VEO-BC or VEO-OC occurrence may not be related to young age at BC or OC onset in relatives in families with BRCAm. This finding—together with a relatively high VEO-BC risk for women with BRCAm—advocates for MRI breast screening from age 25 regardless of family history. Full article

Introduction: Targeted agents such as bevacizumab (BEV) or poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors (PARPi) which have been added as concomitant or maintenance therapies have been shown to improve progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer (PS rOC). In the absence of direct comparison, we performed a network meta-analysis considering BRCA genes status. Methods: We searched PubMed, EMBASE, and MEDLINE for trials involving patients with PS rOC treated with BEV or PARPi. Different comparisons were performed for patients included in the PARPi trials, according to BRCA genes status as follows: all comers (AC) population, BRCA 1/2 mutated (BRCAm), and BRCA wild type patients (BRCAwt). Results: In the overall population, PARPi prolonged PFS with respect to BEV (hazard ratio (HR) = 0.70, 95% CI 0.54–0.91). In the BRCA mutated carriers, the PFS improvement in favor of PARPi appeared to be higher (HR = 0.46, 95% CI 0.36–0.59) while in BRCAwt patients the superiority of PARPi over BEV failed to reach a statistically significance level (HR = 0.87, 95% CI 0.63–1.20); however, according to the SUCRA analysis, PARPi had the highest probability of being ranked as the most effective therapy (90% and 60%, for PARPi and BEV, respectively). Conclusions: PARPi performed better as compared with BEV in terms of PFS for the treatment of PS rOC, especially in BRCAm patients who had not previously received PARPi. Full article

Background: Olaparib maintenance therapy has shown efficacy and tolerability in patients with platinum-sensitive, high-grade serous recurrent ovarian cancer (HSROC) with BRCA1/2 mutation (BRCAm). Our aim was to present real-world experience with olaparib in Korea. Method: We included HSROC patients with BRCAm treated with olaparib maintenance at four institutions in Korea between 2016 and 2018. Medical records were reviewed for clinico-pathologic characteristics, objective response, survival outcomes, and safety. Results: One hundred HSROC patients with BRCAm were included. BRCA1 mutation was present in 71 patients (71.0%), and BRCA2 mutation was present in 23 patients (23.0%). In terms of the best objective response with olaparib maintenance in 53 patients with partial remission from most recent chemotherapy, complete remission occurred in 12 (22.6%) and partial remission in four (7.5%), while 33 patients (62.3%) had stable disease. The 24 month progression-free survival was 42.4%, and 24 month overall survival was 82.1%. Grade 3 or more adverse events were as follows: anemia in 14 patients (14.0%), neutropenia in seven patients (7.0%), thrombocytopenia in two patients (2.0%), oral mucositis in one patient (1.0%), and soft tissue infection in one patient (1.0%). Conclusions: The safety and effectiveness of olaparib maintenance treatment in a real-world study were consistent with those reported in previous clinical trials. Full article