water-logo

Journal Browser

Journal Browser

Flood Risk Identification and Management, 2nd Edition

A special issue of Water (ISSN 2073-4441). This special issue belongs to the section "Hydrology".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: 25 October 2025 | Viewed by 2253

Special Issue Editor


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
College of Hydrology and Water Resources, Hohai University, Nanjing 210098, China
Interests: reservoir operation; flood control operation; risk analysis; water resource allocation and management
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

Floods, as one of the most common natural disasters around the world, cause serious economic loss and even human fatalities. Moreover, there are many uncertainties associated with flood forecast and management that induce risks in flood control decision making. Therefore, risk identification and management are crucial to mitigate flood hazards and disasters in river basins.

Topics of interest for this Special Issue include, but are not limited to, the following:

  1. Understanding and methodologies for risk identification with respect to flood, flood forecast, flood control operation, and decision making;
  2. Flood forecast and operation methodologies dealing with uncertainties and risks;
  3. Risk analysis methods and models for flood, as well as flood forecast, operation, and decision making;
  4. Risk management measures and methods to mitigate flood hazards and disasters considering uncertainties.

Dr. Juan Chen
Guest Editor

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Water is an international peer-reviewed open access semimonthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2600 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • flood
  • flood management
  • flood control operation
  • risk identification
  • risk assessment
  • risk management
  • uncertainty

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

  • Ease of navigation: Grouping papers by topic helps scholars navigate broad scope journals more efficiently.
  • Greater discoverability: Special Issues support the reach and impact of scientific research. Articles in Special Issues are more discoverable and cited more frequently.
  • Expansion of research network: Special Issues facilitate connections among authors, fostering scientific collaborations.
  • External promotion: Articles in Special Issues are often promoted through the journal's social media, increasing their visibility.
  • Reprint: MDPI Books provides the opportunity to republish successful Special Issues in book format, both online and in print.

Further information on MDPI's Special Issue policies can be found here.

Published Papers (3 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

35 pages, 7892 KB  
Article
Nature-Based Solutions for Flood Risk Reduction in Lethem and Tabatinga, Guyana: An Integrated Approach
by Temitope D. Timothy Oyedotun, Esan Ayeni Hamer, Linda Johnson-Bhola, Stephan Moonsammy, Oluwasinaayomi Faith Kasim and Gordon A. Nedd
Water 2025, 17(16), 2435; https://doi.org/10.3390/w17162435 - 18 Aug 2025
Viewed by 1099
Abstract
This study presents a comprehensive assessment and strategic framework for implementing Nature-Based Solutions (NBSs) to mitigate flooding in Lethem and Tabatinga, Region 9 of Guyana. The communities are increasingly vulnerable to flooding due to climate variability, hydrological dynamics, and socio-economic factors. A mixed-methods [...] Read more.
This study presents a comprehensive assessment and strategic framework for implementing Nature-Based Solutions (NBSs) to mitigate flooding in Lethem and Tabatinga, Region 9 of Guyana. The communities are increasingly vulnerable to flooding due to climate variability, hydrological dynamics, and socio-economic factors. A mixed-methods approach, comprising hydrological modelling and observation, a questionnaire survey with a sample of households in both communities, and interviews with municipal administrators, was utilised to acquire data for the study. The study utilised the Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) to analyse the socio-economic impacts of flooding in the two communities. The results revealed that recent events, such as the significant floods of 2022, have prompted an urgent need for sustainable management strategies. Community engagement efforts, supported by data analysis through remote sensing technology, identified flood-prone areas and vulnerable populations, including women, the elderly, and persons with disabilities. Chi-Square testing was conducted to determine mutual dependence between the communities’ livelihood activities and disruptions to income and working days, and their ability to deal with flooding. Based on the results, the farmers were the group that the highest inability to deal with flooding. Existing infrastructure, including drainage systems and emergency response initiatives led by the Civil Defence Commission, has contributed to improved flood management; however, limitations persist, particularly in urban planning and land use practices. This study underscores the detailed process of implementing and adopting NBS approaches, such as flood conveyance solutions and water storage and bio-retention solutions. These solutions can improve water quality, preserve ecosystems, and enhance community well-being while reducing flood risks. Applying these solutions in the targeted communities promises to bolster ecological resilience, support climate adaptation, and reduce the incidence and the impact of floods in the sampled communities. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Flood Risk Identification and Management, 2nd Edition)
Show Figures

Figure 1

19 pages, 1167 KB  
Article
A Reservoir Group Flood Control Operation Decision-Making Risk Analysis Model Considering Indicator and Weight Uncertainties
by Tangsong Luo, Xiaofeng Sun, Hailong Zhou, Yueping Xu and Yu Zhang
Water 2025, 17(14), 2145; https://doi.org/10.3390/w17142145 - 18 Jul 2025
Viewed by 356
Abstract
Reservoir group flood control scheduling decision-making faces multiple uncertainties, such as dynamic fluctuations of evaluation indicators and conflicts in weight assignment. This study proposes a risk analysis model for the decision-making process: capturing the temporal uncertainties of flood control indicators (such as reservoir [...] Read more.
Reservoir group flood control scheduling decision-making faces multiple uncertainties, such as dynamic fluctuations of evaluation indicators and conflicts in weight assignment. This study proposes a risk analysis model for the decision-making process: capturing the temporal uncertainties of flood control indicators (such as reservoir maximum water level and downstream control section flow) through the Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) network, constructing a feasible weight space including four scenarios (unique fixed value, uniform distribution, etc.), resolving conflicts among the weight results from four methods (Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP), Entropy Weight, Criteria Importance Through Intercriteria Correlation (CRITIC), Principal Component Analysis (PCA)) using game theory, defining decision-making risk as the probability that the actual safety level fails to reach the evaluation threshold, and quantifying risks based on the First-Order Second-Moment (FOSM) method. Case verification in the cascade reservoirs of the Qiantang River Basin of China shows that the model provides a risk assessment framework integrating multi-source uncertainties for flood control scheduling decisions through probabilistic description of indicator uncertainties (e.g., Zmax1 with μ = 65.3 and σ = 8.5) and definition of weight feasible regions (99% weight distribution covered by the 3σ criterion), filling the methodological gap in risk quantification during the decision-making process in existing research. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Flood Risk Identification and Management, 2nd Edition)
Show Figures

Figure 1

21 pages, 3192 KB  
Article
Flood Regional Composition Considering Typical-Year and Multi-Site Flood Source Characteristics
by Yun Wang, Sirui Zhong, Shenglian Guo, Bokai Sun and Xiaoya Wang
Water 2025, 17(7), 1106; https://doi.org/10.3390/w17071106 - 7 Apr 2025
Viewed by 478
Abstract
The construction and operation of reservoirs have significantly altered the downstream flow regime, and the flood regional composition (FRC) method has been widely used to estimate design flood considering the regulation impact of upstream cascade reservoirs. This paper proposes a novel flood regional [...] Read more.
The construction and operation of reservoirs have significantly altered the downstream flow regime, and the flood regional composition (FRC) method has been widely used to estimate design flood considering the regulation impact of upstream cascade reservoirs. This paper proposes a novel flood regional composition based on the proper orthogonal decomposition (FRC-POD) method that comprehensively takes into account typical-year flood differences and the multi-site flood source characteristics. The proposed method is applied at Cuntan hydrologic station in the upper Yangtze River and compared with the typical-year flood composition (TYFC) method and the most likely flood regional composition (MLFRC) method. The results show the following: (1) The proposed FRC-POD method can identify main flood sources in the design section and pay more attention to floods from the mainstream and the uncontrolled interval basin. (2) Compared with the originally designed values, the 1000-year design peak discharge and 3 d, 7 d, and 15 d flood volumes estimated by the FRC-POD method are decreased by 41.3%, 40.2%, 36.6%, and 34.7%, respectively. (3) Current FRC methods depend on the selected typical-year flood events and have several solutions, while the proposed method has only one final solution, which is more reasonable in practical application. (4) A comparative study proves that the FRC-POD method could obtain rational design flood estimation and is worth further study. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Flood Risk Identification and Management, 2nd Edition)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop