Phage Display in Cancer Research

A special issue of Viruses (ISSN 1999-4915). This special issue belongs to the section "Bacterial Viruses".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (29 February 2024) | Viewed by 8740

Special Issue Editor


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
College of Veterinary Medicine, Auburn University, Auburn, AL, USA
Interests: phage display and phage nanobiotechnology; targeted drug and gene delivery; cancer nanomedicines; diagnosis of infectious diseases and cancer
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

The fascinating story of the miracle recovery of a cervical cancer patient vaccinated with a live attenuated rabies virus, along with many other successful cases of using viruses observed after 1904, was reported by Ma et all.1 Virotherapy was intensively studied in the mid twentieth century, when researchers treated cancer patients with a wide range of oncolytic viruses (OVs) which demonstrated ability to selectively bind to and kill tumor cells. However, despite their great promise, very few virotherapies reached clinical trials. In the late 1970s, recombinant technology enabled the modification of wild-type viruses to produce safer and more effective virus strains. The subsequent successful use of recombinant OVs for cancer treatment stimulated development of novel viral-based platforms, such as virus-like particles (VLPs), which are assembled from native viral proteins and normally inherit the tropism of the virus from which they originate. The absence of natural tropism towards mammalian cells is a great advantage in the engineering of bacteriophages as drug and gene delivery vectors precisely targeted to cancer cell receptors.2, 3 The idea behind employing the recombinant phages in antitumor therapy is their ability to target the tumor-specific antigens in a polyvalent fashion that allows strong specific and selective binding of phage-based vehicles to cancer cells, and delivery of their toxic cargo to targeted cellular compartments.4 Examples of phage display applications in oncology, cell biology, drug discovery, and delivery systems have been formally reviewed.5, 6

As noted above, filamentous and other types of bacteriophages, commonly used in phage display, have no natural tropism to mammalian cells and are not considered as killers of tumors, but they serve as suitable vectors for generating random protein phage-displayed libraries — a rich source of ligands for mammalian cell receptors including cancer-specific receptors.7 A spectacular chronicle of pharmaceutical antibody development using phage display was recounted by Sir Gregory P. Winter in his Nobel lecture.8

This Special Issue aims to demonstrate the power of phage display as a universal tool of directed molecular evolution in cancer research. We call for manuscripts that bring the fundamental principles of phage display and directed evolution to a new level in the development of diagnostics and chemotherapy for cancer diseases. For example, combining affinity selection with natural functional selection in vivo allows the creation of novel proteins and protein-based (nano)materials with unique emergent properties, which are used as artificial regulators of inter- and intracellular processes in tumor tissues and cancer cells, and novel (nano)materials for medicine, science, and technology.

References:

[1] Ma, X. Y., Hill, B. D., Hoang, T., and Wen, F. (2022) Virus-inspired strategies for cancer therapy, Seminars in Cancer Biology 86, 1143–1157.

[2] Petrenko, V. A. (2018) Landscape Phage: Evolution from Phage Display to Nanobiotechnology, Viruses-Basel 10.

[3] Petrov, G., Dymova, M., and Richter, V. (2022) Bacteriophage-Mediated Cancer Gene Therapy, Int J Mol Sci 23.

[4] Petrenko, V. A., and Gillespie, J. W. (2017) Paradigm shift in bacteriophage-mediated delivery of anticancer drugs: from targeted "magic bullets' to self-navigated "magic missiles', Expert Opinion on Drug Delivery 14, 373–384.

[5] Zambrano-Mila, M. S., Blacio, K. E. S., and Vispo, N. S. (2020) Peptide Phage Display: Molecular Principles and Biomedical Applications, Therapeutic Innovation & Regulatory Science 54, 308–317.

[6] Manivannan, A. C., Dhandapani, R., Velmurugan, P., Thangavelu, S., Paramasivam, R., Ragunathan, L., and Saravanan, M. (2022) Phage in cancer treatment – Biology of therapeutic phage and screening of tumor targeting peptide, Expert Opinion on Drug Delivery 19, 873–882.

[7] Smith, G. P. (2019) Phage Display: Simple Evolution in a Petri Dish (Nobel Lecture), Angew Chem Int Ed Engl 58, 14428–14437.

[8] Nagano, K., and Tsutsumi, Y. (2021) Phage Display Technology as a Powerful Platform for Antibody Drug Discovery, Viruses 13, 178.

[9] Sir Gregory P. Winter: Nobel Lecture in Chemistry 2018 - YouTube.

Prof. Dr. Valery A. Petrenko
Guest Editor

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Viruses is an international peer-reviewed open access monthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2600 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Published Papers (5 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

Jump to: Review

13 pages, 1914 KiB  
Article
Combining Cellular Immunization and Phage Display Screening Results in Novel, FcγRI-Specific Antibodies
by Steffen Krohn, Tosca Holtrop, Arianne M. Brandsma, Petra Moerer, Maaike Nederend, Nikos Darzentas, Monika Brüggemann, Katja Klausz, Jeanette H. W. Leusen and Matthias Peipp
Viruses 2024, 16(4), 596; https://doi.org/10.3390/v16040596 - 12 Apr 2024
Viewed by 557
Abstract
Antibodies that specifically bind to individual human fragment crystallizable γ receptors (FcγRs) are of interest as research tools in studying immune cell functions, as well as components in bispecific antibodies for immune cell engagement in cancer therapy. Monoclonal antibodies for human low-affinity FcγRs [...] Read more.
Antibodies that specifically bind to individual human fragment crystallizable γ receptors (FcγRs) are of interest as research tools in studying immune cell functions, as well as components in bispecific antibodies for immune cell engagement in cancer therapy. Monoclonal antibodies for human low-affinity FcγRs have been successfully generated by hybridoma technology and are widely used in pre-clinical research. However, the generation of monoclonal antibodies by hybridoma technology that specifically bind to the high-affinity receptor FcγRI is challenging. Monomeric mouse IgG2a, IgG2b, and IgG3 bind human FcγRI with high affinity via the Fc part, leading to an Fc-mediated rather than a fragment for antigen binding (Fab)-mediated selection of monoclonal antibodies. Blocking the Fc-binding site of FcγRI with an excess of human IgG or Fc during screening decreases the risk of Fc-mediated interactions but can also block the potential epitopes of new antibody candidates. Therefore, we replaced hybridoma technology with phage display of a single-chain fragment variable (scFv) antibody library that was generated from mice immunized with FcγRI-positive cells and screened it with a cellular panning approach assisted by next-generation sequencing (NGS). Seven new FcγRI-specific antibody sequences were selected with this methodology, which were produced as Fc-silent antibodies showing FcγRI-restricted specificity. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Phage Display in Cancer Research)
Show Figures

Figure 1

12 pages, 1904 KiB  
Article
Phage vs. Phage: Direct Selections of Sandwich Binding Pairs
by Emily C. Sanders, Alicia M. Santos, Eugene K. Nguyen, Aidan A. Gelston, Sudipta Majumdar and Gregory A. Weiss
Viruses 2023, 15(3), 807; https://doi.org/10.3390/v15030807 - 22 Mar 2023
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 2300
Abstract
The sandwich format immunoassay is generally more sensitive and specific than more common assay formats, including direct, indirect, or competitive. A sandwich assay, however, requires two receptors to bind non-competitively to the target analyte. Typically, pairs of antibodies (Abs) or antibody fragments (Fabs) [...] Read more.
The sandwich format immunoassay is generally more sensitive and specific than more common assay formats, including direct, indirect, or competitive. A sandwich assay, however, requires two receptors to bind non-competitively to the target analyte. Typically, pairs of antibodies (Abs) or antibody fragments (Fabs) that are capable of forming a sandwiching with the target are identified through a slow, guess-and-check method with panels of candidate binding partners. Additionally, sandwich assays that are reliant on commercial antibodies can suffer from changes to reagent quality outside the researchers’ control. This report presents a reimagined and simplified phage display selection protocol that directly identifies sandwich binding peptides and Fabs. The approach yielded two sandwich pairs, one peptide–peptide and one Fab–peptide sandwich for the cancer and Parkinson’s disease biomarker DJ-1. Requiring just a few weeks to identify, the sandwich pairs delivered apparent affinity that is comparable to other commercial peptide and antibody sandwiches. The results reported here could expand the availability of sandwich binding partners for a wide range of clinical biomarker assays. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Phage Display in Cancer Research)
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

Review

Jump to: Research

24 pages, 747 KiB  
Review
Improving Pharmacokinetics of Peptides Using Phage Display
by Mallika Asar, Jessica Newton-Northup and Mette Soendergaard
Viruses 2024, 16(4), 570; https://doi.org/10.3390/v16040570 - 07 Apr 2024
Viewed by 979
Abstract
Phage display is a versatile method often used in the discovery of peptides that targets disease-related biomarkers. A major advantage of this technology is the ease and cost efficiency of affinity selection, also known as biopanning, to identify novel peptides. While it is [...] Read more.
Phage display is a versatile method often used in the discovery of peptides that targets disease-related biomarkers. A major advantage of this technology is the ease and cost efficiency of affinity selection, also known as biopanning, to identify novel peptides. While it is relatively straightforward to identify peptides with optimal binding affinity, the pharmacokinetics of the selected peptides often prove to be suboptimal. Therefore, careful consideration of the experimental conditions, including the choice of using in vitro, in situ, or in vivo affinity selections, is essential in generating peptides with high affinity and specificity that also demonstrate desirable pharmacokinetics. Specifically, in vivo biopanning, or the combination of in vitro, in situ, and in vivo affinity selections, has been proven to influence the biodistribution and clearance of peptides and peptide-conjugated nanoparticles. Additionally, the marked difference in properties between peptides and nanoparticles must be considered. While peptide biodistribution depends primarily on physiochemical properties and can be modified by amino acid modifications, the size and shape of nanoparticles also affect both absorption and distribution. Thus, optimization of the desired pharmacokinetic properties should be an important consideration in biopanning strategies to enable the selection of peptides and peptide-conjugated nanoparticles that effectively target biomarkers in vivo. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Phage Display in Cancer Research)
Show Figures

Figure 1

17 pages, 5314 KiB  
Review
Phage Display’s Prospects for Early Diagnosis of Prostate Cancer
by Valery A. Petrenko
Viruses 2024, 16(2), 277; https://doi.org/10.3390/v16020277 - 10 Feb 2024
Viewed by 1101
Abstract
Prostate cancer (PC) is the second most diagnosed cancer among men. It was observed that early diagnosis of disease is highly beneficial for the survival of cancer patients. Therefore, the extension and increasing quality of life of PC patients can be achieved by [...] Read more.
Prostate cancer (PC) is the second most diagnosed cancer among men. It was observed that early diagnosis of disease is highly beneficial for the survival of cancer patients. Therefore, the extension and increasing quality of life of PC patients can be achieved by broadening the cancer screening programs that are aimed at the identification of cancer manifestation in patients at earlier stages, before they demonstrate well-understood signs of the disease. Therefore, there is an urgent need for standard, sensitive, robust, and commonly available screening and diagnosis tools for the identification of early signs of cancer pathologies. In this respect, the “Holy Grail” of cancer researchers and bioengineers for decades has been molecular sensing probes that would allow for the diagnosis, prognosis, and monitoring of cancer diseases via their interaction with cell-secreted and cell-associated PC biomarkers, e.g., PSA and PSMA, respectively. At present, most PSA tests are performed at centralized laboratories using high-throughput total PSA immune analyzers, which are suitable for dedicated laboratories and are not readily available for broad health screenings. Therefore, the current trend in the detection of PC is the development of portable biosensors for mobile laboratories and individual use. Phage display, since its conception by George Smith in 1985, has emerged as a premier tool in molecular biology with widespread application. This review describes the role of the molecular evolution and phage display paradigm in revolutionizing the methods for the early diagnosis and monitoring of PC. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Phage Display in Cancer Research)
Show Figures

Figure 1

26 pages, 1051 KiB  
Review
Progress on Phage Display Technology: Tailoring Antibodies for Cancer Immunotherapy
by Renato Kaylan Alves França, Igor Cabral Studart, Marcus Rafael Lobo Bezerra, Larissa Queiroz Pontes, Antonio Marcos Aires Barbosa, Marcelo Macedo Brigido, Gilvan Pessoa Furtado and Andréa Queiroz Maranhão
Viruses 2023, 15(9), 1903; https://doi.org/10.3390/v15091903 - 09 Sep 2023
Cited by 5 | Viewed by 3080
Abstract
The search for innovative anti-cancer drugs remains a challenge. Over the past three decades, antibodies have emerged as an essential asset in successful cancer therapy. The major obstacle in developing anti-cancer antibodies is the need for non-immunogenic antibodies against human antigens. This unique [...] Read more.
The search for innovative anti-cancer drugs remains a challenge. Over the past three decades, antibodies have emerged as an essential asset in successful cancer therapy. The major obstacle in developing anti-cancer antibodies is the need for non-immunogenic antibodies against human antigens. This unique requirement highlights a disadvantage to using traditional hybridoma technology and thus demands alternative approaches, such as humanizing murine monoclonal antibodies. To overcome these hurdles, human monoclonal antibodies can be obtained directly from Phage Display libraries, a groundbreaking tool for antibody selection. These libraries consist of genetically engineered viruses, or phages, which can exhibit antibody fragments, such as scFv or Fab on their capsid. This innovation allows the in vitro selection of novel molecules directed towards cancer antigens. As foreseen when Phage Display was first described, nowadays, several Phage Display-derived antibodies have entered clinical settings or are undergoing clinical evaluation. This comprehensive review unveils the remarkable progress in this field and the possibilities of using clever strategies for phage selection and tailoring the refinement of antibodies aimed at increasingly specific targets. Moreover, the use of selected antibodies in cutting-edge formats is discussed, such as CAR (chimeric antigen receptor) in CAR T-cell therapy or ADC (antibody drug conjugate), amplifying the spectrum of potential therapeutic avenues. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Phage Display in Cancer Research)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop