sustainability-logo

Journal Browser

Journal Browser

Life Cycle Assessment: From Biomass Cultivation through to End-of-Life Product

A special issue of Sustainability (ISSN 2071-1050). This special issue belongs to the section "Environmental Sustainability and Applications".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (30 September 2022) | Viewed by 6738

Special Issue Editors


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Biobased Products and Energy Crops, University of Hohenheim, Stuttgart, Germany
Interests: sustainability assessment; bioeconomy; biobased value chains; environmental science
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Biobased Products and Energy Crops, University of Hohenheim, Stuttgart, Germany
Interests: environment; environmental impact assessment; plant physiology; energy
Department of Sustainable Agricultural Systems, University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Vienna, Vienna, Austria
Interests: sustainability; environmental impact assessment; environmental management; life-cycle assessment

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

In comparison to conventional fossil-based products, which are made from either oil or natural gas, biobased alternatives can be produced from numerous biomass resources, ranging from agricultural residues such as straw to dedicated biomass crops. This, combined with the various conversion pathways, possible intermediates, as well as end products, results in an almost endless range of biobased value chains.

This raises the question of which biomass should be used in which conversion pathway to produce which kind of biobased product. Several criteria need to be considered in this decision process. The most relevant for the implementation of novel biobased value chains is techno-economic viability. However, environmental and social performance are also of high relevance.

A major obstacle to the implementation of novel biobased value chains is the fact that many of the conversion technologies used are still only proven in the lab or at a pilot stage—they have not yet been realized at an industrially relevant scale. This leads to additional uncertainty in the decision process and raises the question of how this uncertainty can be included in the sustainability assessment of the specific biobased value chains.

The Special Issue entitled “Life Cycle Assessment: From Biomass Cultivation through to End-of‑Life Product” aims to bring together papers that demonstrate methodological approaches to the assessment of the development of biobased value chains. These papers should take into account the sustainability of all process steps, from biomass cultivation through to the product’s end-of‑life. The focus is placed not only on the economic performance but also on the environmental and social impacts of the assessed value chains and on approaches to their integrated assessment.

Dr. Moritz Wagner
Prof. Dr. Iris Lewandowski
Dr. Iris Kral
Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Sustainability is an international peer-reviewed open access semimonthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2400 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • Bioeconomy
  • Novel Biobased Value Chains
  • Life Cycle Sustainability Assessment (LCSA)
  • Life Cycle Assessment (LCA)
  • Life Cycle Cost (LCC)
  • Environmental Life Cycle Assessment (E-LCA)
  • Techno-economic Analysis
  • Prospective LCA

Published Papers (2 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

Jump to: Review

17 pages, 1335 KiB  
Article
Life Cycle Assessment of Biogas Production from Unused Grassland Biomass Pretreated by Steam Explosion Using a System Expansion Method
by Iris Kral, Gerhard Piringer, Molly K. Saylor, Javier Lizasoain, Andreas Gronauer and Alexander Bauer
Sustainability 2020, 12(23), 9945; https://doi.org/10.3390/su12239945 - 27 Nov 2020
Cited by 6 | Viewed by 2524
Abstract
Reforestation is a threat to permanent grasslands in many alpine regions. Using these areas to produce biogas energy may help to preserve these important landscapes and save fossil fuels by adding a renewable local heat and electricity source. This case study compares (a) [...] Read more.
Reforestation is a threat to permanent grasslands in many alpine regions. Using these areas to produce biogas energy may help to preserve these important landscapes and save fossil fuels by adding a renewable local heat and electricity source. This case study compares (a) a status quo (SQ) reference scenario with heating oil, wood-chips, and grid electricity as municipal energy sources, and (b) a hypothetical local biogas (LB) scenario (to also be used as a municipal energy source) based on a 500-kWel biogas plant with steam explosion pretreatment. Here, hay from previously unused grassland is the main biogas substrate, whereas, in the reference SQ scenario, these grasslands remain unused. Life cycle assessment (LCA) results for LB and SQ scenarios are significantly different at p < 0.05 in all six impact categories. In three categories, the LB scenario has lower impacts than the SQ scenario, including climate change (0.367 CO2-eq kWhel-1 versus 0.501 CO2-eq kWhel-1). Dominant contributions to climate change in the SQ scenario are from the extant municipal energy sources that the LB biogas plant would replace; in the LB scenario, important contributions include unburned methane from the biogas plant, as well as CO2 emissions from hay production machines. In summary, important environmental impacts can be reduced and alpine grasslands can be preserved by biogas production from that grass. The advantages of integrating a local biogas plant in municipal energy and waste systems depend strongly on the extant municipal energy system characteristics. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Review

Jump to: Research

27 pages, 727 KiB  
Review
Social Aspects in the Assessment of Biobased Value Chains
by Nirvana Angela Marting Vidaurre, Ricardo Vargas-Carpintero, Moritz Wagner, Jan Lask and Iris Lewandowski
Sustainability 2020, 12(23), 9843; https://doi.org/10.3390/su12239843 - 25 Nov 2020
Cited by 12 | Viewed by 3515
Abstract
Social Life-Cycle Assessment (S-LCA) is under continuous development. The Methodological Sheets for Subcategories in S-LCA are a set of guidelines commonly used for the performance of such assessments. They cover a variety of stakeholders and subcategories for the social assessment of products in [...] Read more.
Social Life-Cycle Assessment (S-LCA) is under continuous development. The Methodological Sheets for Subcategories in S-LCA are a set of guidelines commonly used for the performance of such assessments. They cover a variety of stakeholders and subcategories for the social assessment of products in general. However, they may not necessarily be appropriate for the assessment of biobased value chains of agricultural and forestry origin. The aim of this study is the identification of social aspects relevant for the assessment of biobased value chains across various regions of the world, including those aspects possibly overlooked in the Methodological Sheets for Subcategories in S-LCA. For this purpose, a literature review of empirical studies was performed using the sheets as a reference. The results show that the Methodological Sheets for Subcategories in S-LCA provide good coverage of social topics relevant for biobased value chains, but that the stakeholders “smallholder” and “family farm” are not adequately addressed. Drawing on the empirical literature reviewed, the study emphasizes the relevance of these stakeholders in the analysis of biobased value chains of agricultural and forestry origin, and proposes criteria for consideration in the assessment of this stakeholder. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop