sustainability-logo

Journal Browser

Journal Browser

Internalizing Animals and Ecosystems in Social Sustainability and Social Policy: Going from Political Community to Political Country

A special issue of Sustainability (ISSN 2071-1050). This special issue belongs to the section "Sustainability, Biodiversity and Conservation".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (28 February 2022) | Viewed by 7840

Special Issue Editor


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Political Science, Department of Management and Engineering, Linköpings universitet, Sweden
Interests: sustainability; low carbon development; citizenship; social policy

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

The aim of this Special Issue is to explore, conceptualize, and research the need to internalize both animals and ecosystems in our understanding of social citizenship, social policy, and sustainable development. This Special Issue aims to rethink the nexus of social policy and the environment by bridging the strands of deep ecology/ecologists, environmental justice, and citizenship/animal rights literature and also to integrate social policy, international development, and environmental protection/conservation. The overarching goal of the issue is to create a theoretical framework for sustainable development and social policy that includes systematic consideration for animals and ecosystem services. This Special Issue argues the importance of integrating animals and ecosystems as a way to re-politicize humans social relation with both animals and our ecosystem as in sustainable development and social policy.

There have been many attempts to expand our political understanding to include the environment in a political and social understanding of animals and ecosystems. These proposals draw upon both animals rights and environmental justice literature to conceptualize a political country but also cover other theoretical strands in the individual articles.

Donaldson and Kymlicka’s groundbreaking Zoopolis: A Political Theory of Animal Rights (2011) argues not simply for animal rights but for an extensive animal citizenship. The overall argument is that the interests of animals should be seen as an essential part of what we perceive as the common good and is an ambitious attempt to not just grant citizenships to animals but also expanding political and social community beyond humans. Donaldson and Kymlicka’s (2011) developed a rather advanced and nuanced understanding that would recognize multiple communities with animal members, and with varying human obligations toward them. Other scholars such as O’Sullivan have highlighted in Animals, Equality and Democracy (2011) the need to include animals in a community based around liberal values and an understanding of species egalitarianism. The author contend that uniform and egalitarian standards for animal treatment should be of highest standards.

Similar thoughts have also been developed within the environmental justice literature. Schlosberg argues further that there is a need to add a capability dimension to the environment in environmental justice; this would ‘enrich conceptions of environmental and climate justice by bringing recognition to the functioning of these systems, in addition to those who live within and depend on them’ (Schlosberg 2013:44). Scholars such as Drake and Keller (2004) and Hillman (2006) have explored the importance of ecological integrity.

There is a good argument that we need to have a change our global understanding of social sustainability and human development and that resource intensive development threatens both the environment through climate change, a drastic decrease of biodiversity, and the ecological integrity of many habitats.

Dr. Johan Nordensvard
Guest Editor

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Sustainability is an international peer-reviewed open access semimonthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2400 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • social sustainability
  • deep ecology
  • environmental justice
  • social policy
  • low carbon development

Published Papers (3 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Editorial

Jump to: Research, Review

15 pages, 282 KiB  
Editorial
Internalizing Animals and Ecosystems in Social Citizenship and Social Policy: From Political Community to Political Country
by Johan Nordensvard, Jason Alexandra and Markus Ketola
Sustainability 2021, 13(12), 6601; https://doi.org/10.3390/su13126601 - 09 Jun 2021
Cited by 3 | Viewed by 2980
Abstract
The aim of this editorial is to explore, conceptualize, and research the need to internalize both animals and ecosystems in our understanding of social citizenship and social policy. This editorial should be seen as a brief overview of the themes that should be [...] Read more.
The aim of this editorial is to explore, conceptualize, and research the need to internalize both animals and ecosystems in our understanding of social citizenship and social policy. This editorial should be seen as a brief overview of the themes that should be covered in the contributions to the Special Issue, “Internalizing Animals and Ecosystems in Social Citizenship and Social Policy: From Political Community to Political Country”. This Special Issue argues the importance of integrating animals and ecosystems as a way to re-politicize humans’ social relation with both animals and our ecosystem as in sustainable development and social policy. If environmental policy becomes social policy, we would re-construct social citizenship to include consideration for animals and ecosystems as integral part of social policy. This expansion in scope is a progression from seeing humans as part of a political community to becoming more involved in their political country. This aligns with the concept of Country—an all-encompassing term in Australia, involving a people’s territory, land, water, biological resources, the complex obligations and relationships involved. Full article

Research

Jump to: Editorial, Review

18 pages, 1249 KiB  
Article
The River Runs Through It: Naturalising Social Policy and Welfare
by Johan Nordensvärd, Markus Ketola and Frauke Urban
Sustainability 2022, 14(16), 10415; https://doi.org/10.3390/su141610415 - 22 Aug 2022
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1445
Abstract
This paper reconceptualises social rights through an integration of human welfare and environmental welfare. This is essential if we are making a case for the radical policy changes required to respond to the current environmental crisis, such as maximum living standards and maximum [...] Read more.
This paper reconceptualises social rights through an integration of human welfare and environmental welfare. This is essential if we are making a case for the radical policy changes required to respond to the current environmental crisis, such as maximum living standards and maximum income. As living standards and the demand for social rights increase across the world, this will lead to a concomitant pressure on nature. A maximum living standard based on an ecological footprint is a starting point to think about the need to grant legal rights and resources to nature. Following Polanyi, both humans and the environment are fictitious commodities; we therefore need to rethink our approach to social policy and decommodification to include the environment. This requires approaching social rights from an ecological perspective and breaking the anthropocentric barriers welfare policies create between society and nature. Here, we draw on the work of Michel Serres on ‘the natural contract’ in order to rethink the content of the social contract and develop an argument in favour of decommodifying nature. Using rivers as legal entities in New Zealand as our example, we illustrate how this theoretical approach could provide the foundations for sustainable eco-social policies in general and maximum living standards in particular. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Review

Jump to: Editorial, Research

12 pages, 289 KiB  
Review
Designer Ecosystems for the Anthropocene—Deliberately Creating Novel Ecosystems in Cultural Landscapes
by Jason Alexandra
Sustainability 2022, 14(7), 3952; https://doi.org/10.3390/su14073952 - 27 Mar 2022
Cited by 5 | Viewed by 2759
Abstract
Accepting that nature and culture are intricately co-evolved has profound implications for the ethical, legal, philosophical and pragmatic dimensions of social and environmental policy. The way we think about nature affects how we understand and manage ecosystems. While the ideals of preserving wilderness [...] Read more.
Accepting that nature and culture are intricately co-evolved has profound implications for the ethical, legal, philosophical and pragmatic dimensions of social and environmental policy. The way we think about nature affects how we understand and manage ecosystems. While the ideals of preserving wilderness and conserving ecosystems have motivated much conservation effort to date, achieving these ideals may not be feasible under Anthropocene conditions unless communities accept custodial responsibilities for landscapes and other species. This paper’s origins are in the author’s work with the Martuwarra Fitzroy River Council representing Indigenous traditional owners in Australia’s Kimberley region. These landscapes, shaped by 60,000 years of human occupation, interweave knowledge, laws and governance regimes, and material and spiritual connections with country. This interweaving offers insights into options for dealing with humanity’s complex sustainability challenges. The paper also draws on the literature about cultural landscapes, ecological design, agroecology and permaculture to explore options for applying ecological design as a planning and problem-solving framework. The paper concludes that design-based approaches offer significant opportunities for using ecological science to integrate conservation and production in agricultural landscapes in ways that can meet human needs while also conserving biodiversity under climate change. Full article
Back to TopTop