sustainability-logo

Journal Browser

Journal Browser

Sustainable Entrepreneurship: Business Innovation and Organizational Performance

A special issue of Sustainability (ISSN 2071-1050). This special issue belongs to the section "Economic and Business Aspects of Sustainability".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: 15 November 2025 | Viewed by 2824

Special Issue Editors


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Kent Business School, University of Kent, Kent CT2 7FS, UK
Interests: entrepreneurship; small business; firm performance; international business; supply chain
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Manchester Metropolitan University, Business School, Manchester M15 6BH, UK
Interests: strategic HRM; HRD/training; employee wellbeing; entrepreneurship

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Organisations, Economy and Society, University of Westminster, London NW1 5LS, UK
Interests: macroeconomics; development economics; entrepreneurship; SMEs; wellbeing

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Essex Business School, University of Essex, Colchester CO4 3SQ, UK
Interests: entrepreneurial intention; effectuation; entrepreneurship; social entrepreneurship; innovation; impact investing

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

Sustainable entrepreneurship (SE), which incorporates both social and environmental missions into economic value creation in entrepreneurial and innovative activities [1,2], is an increasingly important and growing subfield of entrepreneurship research [2–6]. Central to a critical understanding of the process and outcomes of sustainable endeavour is an appreciation of the different but related concepts of sustainability–economic, environmental, organisational, and social–that obtain within and outside organisations, networks, economies and the wider society [3,7,8].

Over the last decades, a notable amount of research—including theoretical, empirical and review papers - has been published to advance our understanding of SE. The focus of this research has been mainly centred on its conceptualisation, the process of SE and the factors that enhance and encourage it, the variegated role of technology as well as the role of entrepreneurs as agents of change who contribute to sustainable growth and development through creativity and innovation, e.g., [9–13] in a diversity of forms and ways.

Nevertheless, research into SE firm performance and elements that influence sustainable innovative behaviours and entrepreneurial contexts is still a largely underexplored topic and more research is required to shed further light on the aspects related to it within and between various economies and geographical regions see, for example, some interesting discussions in [2,14–16].

This special issue invites SE scholars to examine the process and outcome of SE activity in a more nuanced and inclusive way, considering the socio-geographical diversity and implications of their work. Some possible topics are listed below, but we welcome other relevant suggestions as well:

  • To examine the role of business innovation in the pursuit of private (e.g., financial performance) and public (e.g., sustainable and environmental performance) benefits in the context of SE.
  • To explore how innovative and ethical behaviour occur and are fostered/hindered by various enablers and/or barriers to achieving profit maximisation, sustainable growth and generating social benefits.
  • To examine the role of individual-level (e.g., entrepreneurial ability, ethos, risk aversion), organizational-level (e.g., business strategy, knowledge-creation, leadership), institutional-level (e.g., legislation, green technology, government support, norms) as well as various other multi-level determinants in SE.
  • To investigate the different conceptualisations of sustainability such as ‘farm to fork’; ‘cradle to cradle’ or the ‘circular economy’ to allow for or induce reframing entrepreneurial activity.
  • To enable regional and country-level comparisons and explore the potential for cross-transfer benefits.
  • To understand innovative behaviours and meanings of sustainable performance among various socio-geographical contexts and different economic and technological stages.
  • To examine how business models, support the communalization of sustainability and contribution to business performance in the start, growth and success of SE.
  • To investigate the role of citizens in participating in SE and influencing local decision-making that can yield long-term benefits.

References

  1. Abrahamson, A. (2007). Sustainopreneurship - business with a cause: conceptualizaing entrepreneurship for sustainability. Working Paper. Linnaeus University, Kalmar. https://www.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:205051/FULLTEXT01.pdf.
  2. Anand, A., Argade, P., Barkemeyer, R., Salignac, F. (2021). Trends and patterns in sustainable entrepreneurship research: A bibliometric review and research agenda. Journal of Business Venturing, 36, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2021.106092.
  3. Muñoz, P., Cohen, B. (2020). Sustainable entrepreneurship research: Taking stock and looking ahead. Business Strategy and the Environment, 27(3), 300-312, https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2000.
  4. Haldar, S. (2019). Towards a conceptual understanding of sustainability-driven entrepreneurship. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environment Management, 26, 115701170, https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1763.
  5. Gu, W., Wang, J. (2022). Research on index construction of sustainable entrepreneurship and its impact on economic growth. Journal of Business Research, 142, 266-276, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.12.060.
  6. Holzmann, P., Gregori, P. (2023). The promise of digital technologies for sustainable entrepreneurship: A systematic literature review and research agenda. International Journal of Information Management, 48, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2022.102593.
  7. Belz, F.M., Binder, J.K. (2015) Sustainable entrepreneurship: A convergent process model. Business Strategy and the Environment, 26(1), 1-17, https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.1887.
  8. Schaefer, K., Corner, P.D., Kearins, K. (2015). Social, environmental and sustainable entrepreneurship research: What is needed for sustainability-as-flourishing? Organization & Environment, 28(4), 394-413, https://doi.org/10.1177/1086026615621111.
  9. Shane, S., & Venkataraman, S. (2000). The promise of entrepreneurship as a field of research. Academy of Management Review, 25(1), 217-226, https://doi.org/10.2307/259271.
  10. Dean, T.J., & McMullen, J.S. (2007). Toward a theory of SE: Reducing environmental degradation through entrepreneurial action. Journal of Business Venturing, 22(1), 50-76, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2005.09.003.
  11. Parrish, B.D. (2010). Sustainability-driven entrepreneurship: Principles of organization design. Journal of Business Venturing, 25(5), 510-523, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2009.05.005.
  12. Muñoz, P., & Dimov, D. (2015). The call of the whole in understanding the development of sustainable venture. Journal of Business Venturing, 30(4), 632-654, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2014.07.012.
  13. Allal-Chérif, O., Climent, J.C., Berenguer, K.J.U. (2023). Born to be sustainable: How to combine strategic disruption, open innovation, and process digitization to create a sustainable business. Journal of Business Research, 154, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.113379.
  14. Muñoz, P., Cohen, B. (2018). Sustainable entrepreneurship research: Taking stock and looking ahead. Business Strategy and the Environment, 27(3), 300-322, https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2000.
  15. Terán-Yépez, E., Marín-Carrillo, G.M., Casado-Belmonte, M., Capobianco-Uriarte, M. (2020). Sustainable entrepreneurship: Review of its evolution and new trends. Journal of Cleaner Production, 252, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119742.
  16. Di Daio, A., Hassan, R., Chhabra, M., Arrigo, E., Palladino, R. (2022). Sustainable entrepreneurship impact and entrepreneurial venture life cycle: A systematic literature review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 378, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.134469.

Prof. Dr. George Saridakis
Dr. Yanqing Lai
Dr. Rebeca I. Muñoz Torres
Prof. Jay Mitra
Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Sustainability is an international peer-reviewed open access semimonthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2400 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • sustainable entrepreneurial activity
  • sustainable SMEs
  • sustainable entrepreneurship in public sector
  • sustainable technological innovation
  • ethical leadership
  • inclusive and green growth
  • sustainable economic development
  • sustainable micro/macro models
  • heterodox environmental economics
  • sustainable regional development
  • firm strategic priorities
  • long-term public policy

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

  • Ease of navigation: Grouping papers by topic helps scholars navigate broad scope journals more efficiently.
  • Greater discoverability: Special Issues support the reach and impact of scientific research. Articles in Special Issues are more discoverable and cited more frequently.
  • Expansion of research network: Special Issues facilitate connections among authors, fostering scientific collaborations.
  • External promotion: Articles in Special Issues are often promoted through the journal's social media, increasing their visibility.
  • Reprint: MDPI Books provides the opportunity to republish successful Special Issues in book format, both online and in print.

Further information on MDPI's Special Issue policies can be found here.

Published Papers (2 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

18 pages, 656 KiB  
Article
Sustainability Accounting and Reporting: An Ablative Reflexive Thematic Analysis of Climate Crisis via Conservative or Radical Reform Paradigms
by Simon Huston
Sustainability 2025, 17(11), 4943; https://doi.org/10.3390/su17114943 - 28 May 2025
Viewed by 378
Abstract
Despite the climate crisis, a significant barrier to sustainability is limitations to the current accounting and reporting system. These deficiencies, mean the global financial system continues to invest trillions of dollars annually in environmentally sub-optimal projects. To catalyze the economic transition away from [...] Read more.
Despite the climate crisis, a significant barrier to sustainability is limitations to the current accounting and reporting system. These deficiencies, mean the global financial system continues to invest trillions of dollars annually in environmentally sub-optimal projects. To catalyze the economic transition away from fossil-fuel and plastic configurations to more sustainable ones, sustainability accounting and reporting (SAR) is imperative. However, theoretical contention, pragmatic concerns, and costs stoke strong resistance to SAR. The research used ablative thematic analysis to apply hermeneutic phenomenology. First, it scanned the backdrop to the SAR problem and identified a corpus of recent literature from key associated institutions. The initial interpretation of the texts disentangled SAR’s conflicting threads and generated three themes of ‘climate crisis’ and ‘conservative’ or more ‘radical’ SAR reform paradigms. Iteratively harnessing these thematic lenses, the investigation re-examined the SAR literature corpus. The textual ‘dialogue’ generated understanding of the fragmented SAR responses to the climate crisis. Accordingly, the research reformulated its first theme to ‘dystopic climate crisis fragmentation’ and refined the other themes to take account of materiality and the split between Anglo-Saxon (IFRS, SSAB) or global (UN) and continental European accounting institutions (EU, GRI). Conservatives retain a single materiality investor-focus and concede only incremental standard improvements. Radicals seek to implement double materiality with a broader spectrum of stakeholders in mind. Both approaches have theoretical as well as pragmatic advantages and disadvantages, so the SAR contention rumbles on. Whilst the standard-setting landscape is evolving, disagreements remain. Its roots of contention are philosophical and pragmatic. Philosophically, radicals strive to temper libertarian anarcho-capitalist proclivities and broaden firm responsibility. Pragmatically, social, or environmental externalities are problematic to assign or measure. Given vested interests in the destructive status quo, it would be naïve to expect a harmonious SAR Ithaca to emerge anytime soon. Yet the challenges impel an intensification of SAR dialogue and concrete actions. Rather than a scientifically nomothetic contribution, the paper provides a qualitative, artful interpretation of a complex, contentious but crucial field. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

22 pages, 1798 KiB  
Article
The Impact of Institutional Environment and Innovativeness on Early-Stage Entrepreneurial Activities: The Moderating Effects of Reciprocity
by Hyesu Park, Minjung Baek and Chaewon Lee
Sustainability 2025, 17(2), 437; https://doi.org/10.3390/su17020437 - 8 Jan 2025
Viewed by 1364
Abstract
This study investigates the moderating effects of positive and negative reciprocity on the relationship between institutional environment dimensions—cognitive and normative institutions—and innovativeness on early-stage entrepreneurial activities. Utilizing logistic regression models and data from the Global Entrepreneurship Monitor (GEM) Adult Population Survey (APS) and [...] Read more.
This study investigates the moderating effects of positive and negative reciprocity on the relationship between institutional environment dimensions—cognitive and normative institutions—and innovativeness on early-stage entrepreneurial activities. Utilizing logistic regression models and data from the Global Entrepreneurship Monitor (GEM) Adult Population Survey (APS) and the Global Preferences Survey (GPS) across 21 countries, which contains over 22,000 identified individuals, the findings reveal significant insights into how these institutional factors, innovativeness and reciprocity influence entrepreneurial activities globally. As a result of the analysis, (1) contrary to the predominant view that innovativeness universally promotes entrepreneurial success, this study identifies a significant negative relationship between innovativeness and early-stage entrepreneurial activities. (2) Positive reciprocity moderates the effects of both normative institutions and innovativeness, reducing the positive impact of normative institutions while mitigating the negative impact of innovativeness on entrepreneurial activities. (3) Conversely, negative reciprocity significantly amplifies the effects of both normative institutions and innovativeness, intensifying the positive impact of normative institutions and exacerbating the negative impact of innovativeness. By incorporating data from diverse national contexts, this research contributes to a comprehensive understanding of the factors affecting entrepreneurial activities and emphasizes the importance of fostering balanced social interactions. This approach aims to enhance the growth and sustainability of entrepreneurial activities globally, offering valuable insights for national policy development focused on sustainable entrepreneurial ecosystems. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop