sustainability-logo

Journal Browser

Journal Browser

Prospects and Challenges of Sustainable Public Purchasing

A special issue of Sustainability (ISSN 2071-1050).

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (15 October 2020) | Viewed by 31659

Special Issue Editors


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
School of Sustainability, Arizona State University, 875502 Tempe, AZ, USA
Interests: organizational sustainability; self-regulation; sustainable purchasing and consumption; environmental policy

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Watts College of Public Service and Community Solutions, Arizona State University, 85004, Phoenix, AZ, USA
Interests: public administration and management; sustainability; citizenship behavior

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Watts College of Public Service and Community Solutions, Arizona State University, 85004, Phoenix, AZ, USA
Interests: public administration and management; science policy; environmental policy

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

The public sector represents the largest single buyer of goods and services worldwide (World Bank Group, 2016), accounting for more than 17 percent of global GDP. Even at the local level, public sector purchasing has enormous economic impact. For instance, in the U.S. alone, local governments purchase $1.72 trillion of goods annually (U.S. Census, 2016), which accounts for between 25 percent and 40 percent of all tax dollars collected (Coggburn, 2003). Collectively, these purchases generate environmental impacts that are nine times greater than the impacts associated with managing the public sector’s buildings and fleets (Tangherlini, 2014). However, only recently has the public sector begun to implement more broad-sweeping sustainable purchasing (or procurement) policies.

For this Special Issue, we welcome scholarly papers that advance our understanding of how governments and other public sector organizations (e.g., public schools, universities, the military) are advancing sustainable purchasing. We encourage submissions that address, but are not limited to, the following topics and questions:

Broader Concerns Related to Sustainable Public Purchasing

  • What opportunities and challenges exist for the public sector organizations that implement sustainable purchasing? How do these opportunities differ from businesses that implement sustainable purchasing?
  • To what extent is the public sector using sustainable procurement to advance their broader social objectives (e.g., minority-owned business preferences, fair trade, slavery-free labor, worker health and safety) and economic development (e.g., local vendor preferences)?
  • How does sustainable public procurement fit within broader discussions about sustainable consumption and the United Nations’ Sustainable Development Goals?

Sustainable Purchasing and Organization Mission, Culture, Leadership, and Structure

  • In what ways do complementary policies and practices (e.g., recycling policies, energy conservation policies) facilitate sustainable public procurement?
  • What types of organization cultures facilitate sustainable public purchasing?
  • How does purchasing hierarchy (e.g., centralized, decentralized) affect the effectiveness of sustainable public purchasing and why?
  • What kinds of resources and capabilities are needed to develop successful sustainable public purchasing programs? Are some more important than others, and, if so, why?

Motivation to Adopt Sustainable Public Purchasing

  • What factors (e.g., stakeholders, institutional pressures, etc.) motivate the public sector to adopt sustainable public procurement policies?
  • What is the role of e-procurement systems in motivating sustainable public procurement and how do these systems influence implementation? What system features are particularly effective?

Public Sector Collaborations Around Sustainable Purchasing

  • In what ways are public sector organizations collaborating with vendors to advance sustainable procurement? Which types of vendor collaborations are more effective than others?
  • What are the benefits and hazards associated with the public sector working collaboratively with vendors and other organizations around sustainable purchasing?
  • Some public sector organizations are relying on regional purchasing models to facilitate sustainable purchasing. What do these coordinated models look like, what are their advantages and disadvantages, and which ones are more successful than others?

Information Access about Sustainable Purchases

  • What are the most effective models for integrating sustainability information into the purchasing process? What types of information are public sector organizations using to determine which products are more sustainable than others?
  • In what ways are public sector organizations monitoring vendors’ claims about their sustainable products and services? How is it managing misinformation?

Sustainable Public Purchasing Outcomes

  • How is the public sector using sustainable purchasing to manage their Scope 3 emissions, embodied carbon, and other environmental impacts? To what extent are they successful?
  • What types of activities (e.g., education, competitions, individual performance incentives) are more likely to lead to successful sustainable purchasing routines?
  • Which types of sustainable public purchasing activities lead to greater environmental and social benefits?
  • Where should organizations focus their attention when first implementing sustainable public purchasing?
  • How are public sector organizations utilizing technical specifications to improve sustainable purchasing and which types of technical specifications are more effective than others?
  • Can successful sustainable public purchasing models be replicated?
  • How are businesses shifting their supply chains in response to public sector pressures for sustainable products and services?

Sustainability reaches a broader audience than many scholarly journals by publishing open-access articles and by informing both theory and practice. For author guidelines see: https://www.mdpi.com/journal/sustainability/instructions.

Submission and Review Process: The deadline for submissions is May 1, 2020. All papers will be externally reviewed according to the policies of Sustainability.

Submission Deadline:

May 1, 2020

Deadline for electronic paper submission to Sustainability

More Information:

For additional information, please contact the Special Issue editors:

Prof. Nicole Darnall
Prof. Justin M. Stritch
Prof. Stuart Bretschneider
Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All papers will be peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Sustainability is an international peer-reviewed open access semimonthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 1700 CHF (Swiss Francs). The best ten Special Issue articles qualify for a 50 percent reduction in the Article Processing Charge (850 CHF). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • sustainable public purchasing
  • sustainable public procurement
  • green purchasing
  • green procurement
  • government purchasing
  • government procurement
  • purchasing policy
  • procurement policy
  • purchasing guidelines
  • procurement guidelines
  • fair trade
  • ecolabels
  • minority purchasing
  • veterans’ purchasing
  • buy local
  • local purchasing
  • modern slavery

Published Papers (7 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

18 pages, 310 KiB  
Article
Estimating the True Size of Public Procurement to Assess Sustainability Impact
by Fatima Hafsa, Nicole Darnall and Stuart Bretschneider
Sustainability 2021, 13(3), 1448; https://doi.org/10.3390/su13031448 - 30 Jan 2021
Cited by 20 | Viewed by 4785
Abstract
Public procurement, the government’s purchase of goods and services, is an important tool to advance sustainability objectives. Since government is the largest consumer in the economy, it can have a sizable impact on the market by purchasing sustainably. However, its sustainability impact (both [...] Read more.
Public procurement, the government’s purchase of goods and services, is an important tool to advance sustainability objectives. Since government is the largest consumer in the economy, it can have a sizable impact on the market by purchasing sustainably. However, its sustainability impact (both environmental and social) is undermined because the public procurement’s size is underestimated. Previous estimates of public procurement only consider contract-based purchases or non-defense purchases. In other instances, data are too limited to estimate government purchases appropriately. These factors lead to underestimations of the extent to which government purchasing can be leveraged to advance sustainability objectives. To understand the true impact of government purchases, we estimated the size of public procurement by considering all aspects of public procurement. We used this estimation to assess whether current measurement processes misrepresent the size of public procurement and identify key elements that may be missing from the current public procurement measures. We applied our estimate to four OECD countries, the U.S., the U.K., Italy, and the Netherlands for two years (2017 and 2018). Our results showed that that across all levels of government, public procurement as a percentage of GDP in the U.S., the U.K., Italy, and the Netherlands ranged between 19–24%, 13–56%, 3–10%, and 12–38%, respectively. Our findings revealed that governments have substantially greater market power than previously estimated, which can be leveraged to pursue sustainability goals. Our findings also illustrate systemic data challenges to how public procurement data are collected and analyzed. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Prospects and Challenges of Sustainable Public Purchasing)
13 pages, 535 KiB  
Article
Sustainable Public Procurement in Central European Countries. Can It Also Bring Savings?
by Peter Džupka, Matúš Kubák and Peter Nemec
Sustainability 2020, 12(21), 9241; https://doi.org/10.3390/su12219241 - 06 Nov 2020
Cited by 15 | Viewed by 3700
Abstract
The efficiency of public resource use and its strategic framework with respect to sustainable public procurement policies, such as the most economically advantageous tender (hereafter MEAT), has become an important topic nowadays. Therefore, the study examines the determinants of savings creation within MEAT [...] Read more.
The efficiency of public resource use and its strategic framework with respect to sustainable public procurement policies, such as the most economically advantageous tender (hereafter MEAT), has become an important topic nowadays. Therefore, the study examines the determinants of savings creation within MEAT in Central European countries. It uses a dataset published in the Tenders Electronic Daily database in 2017–2018 about contract award notices and carries out a generalized linear model to study the determinants of savings creation within MEAT. The findings suggest that when services are procured within MEAT, the savings are considerably higher than compared to works. If the framework agreement takes place in a procurement process, the savings are significantly smaller. In cases where the subject of procurement is not co-financed by EU funds, the savings are higher than in the case that they are. If an open type of procurement is used, the savings are seemingly smaller than in cases where a non-open type of procurement takes place. When the contract is awarded to a single supplier, the savings are higher than otherwise. A higher number of total offers, as well as a higher number of offers from small and medium-sized enterprises, induce higher savings. It can be concluded that the use of sustainable public procurement subtly reduces the creation of savings. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Prospects and Challenges of Sustainable Public Purchasing)
Show Figures

Figure 1

24 pages, 1389 KiB  
Article
Advancement of Green Public Purchasing by Category: Do Municipality Green Purchasing Policies Have Any Role in Japan?
by Takuro Miyamoto, Naonari Yajima, Takahiro Tsukahara and Toshi H. Arimura
Sustainability 2020, 12(21), 8979; https://doi.org/10.3390/su12218979 - 29 Oct 2020
Cited by 4 | Viewed by 3425
Abstract
The aim of this paper is to identify (1) the categories in which it is easier or more difficult for local municipalities to implement green purchasing and (2) the role and extent of green purchasing policy (GPP) in promoting green purchasing. To characterize [...] Read more.
The aim of this paper is to identify (1) the categories in which it is easier or more difficult for local municipalities to implement green purchasing and (2) the role and extent of green purchasing policy (GPP) in promoting green purchasing. To characterize the green purchasing potential of different categories, we examine the green purchasing rate, or the ratio of green products/services to total products/services purchased, of 21 categories of items. We employ data from a unique survey conducted by the Japanese Ministry of the Environment, which provides data on green procurement in municipalities. We observe that air conditioners suffer from low green purchasing rates, whereas most municipalities purchase green products in the paper products and stationery categories. We also examine the relationship between green purchasing rates and GPPs to identify the role and extent of GPPs. Our regression analyses reveal that the presence of a GPP is associated with higher implementation and measurement rates of green purchasing. This pattern is particularly evident for the categories in which many municipalities without GPPs purchase green products but, in most cases, do not measure their green purchasing rate. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Prospects and Challenges of Sustainable Public Purchasing)
Show Figures

Figure 1

26 pages, 360 KiB  
Article
Municipal Green Purchasing in Mexico: Policy Adoption and Implementation Success
by Ana R. Leal, David Perez-Castillo, José Ernesto Amorós and Bryan W. Husted
Sustainability 2020, 12(20), 8339; https://doi.org/10.3390/su12208339 - 10 Oct 2020
Cited by 7 | Viewed by 2893
Abstract
In this paper, we seek to determine what factors drive the adoption of green purchasing among municipalities in Mexico and the success of their implementation. Given the lack of research and theory in the area, this study is exploratory in nature. We applied [...] Read more.
In this paper, we seek to determine what factors drive the adoption of green purchasing among municipalities in Mexico and the success of their implementation. Given the lack of research and theory in the area, this study is exploratory in nature. We applied the green purchasing survey developed by Arizona State University to all municipalities in Mexico with a population of 25,000 or more inhabitants. Using the least absolute shrinkage and selector operator method (LASSO), we reduced the set of measures, which we then employed in a logistic regression to predict whether the municipality would adopt a green purchasing policy. We found that complementary environmental practices, department rules, and city-wide contracts to reduce purchasing costs have a positive and significant effect on the propensity to adopt green purchasing policies, but the time for routine low-cost purchases has a negative effect on green purchasing policy adoption. Then, using two-stage least squares, we developed a model of the factors leading to successful implementation of green purchasing. We found that complementary environmental policies, environmental practices, environmental program knowledge, and city-wide contracts to reduce purchasing costs are positively and significantly related to successful implementation. However, department resources and the time for routine low-cost purchase are significant, but negatively related. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Prospects and Challenges of Sustainable Public Purchasing)
17 pages, 812 KiB  
Article
Sustainability Policy Objectives, Centralized Decision Making, and Efficiency in Public Procurement Processes in U.S. Local Governments
by Justin M. Stritch, Stuart Bretschneider, Nicole Darnall, Lily Hsueh and Yifan Chen
Sustainability 2020, 12(17), 6934; https://doi.org/10.3390/su12176934 - 26 Aug 2020
Cited by 23 | Viewed by 4711
Abstract
Some U.S. local governments are leveraging public procurement to meet their sustainability goals. However, does the simultaneous pursuit of multiple sustainability objectives potentially slow down the speed of procurement processes? We suggest that the simultaneous pursuit of multiple sustainability objectives through procurement is [...] Read more.
Some U.S. local governments are leveraging public procurement to meet their sustainability goals. However, does the simultaneous pursuit of multiple sustainability objectives potentially slow down the speed of procurement processes? We suggest that the simultaneous pursuit of multiple sustainability objectives through procurement is related to decision making speed. Additionally, we argue that centralized decision-making structures might moderate this relationship. Drawing on a representative sample of more than 200 U.S. local governments, we demonstrate that for low-cost purchases, as the number of policy objectives increases, so too does the average length of time for approval. We also find evidence of an interactive relationship between decision-making structures and the number of existing sustainability policies pursued simultaneously. For routine low-cost and routine high-cost purchases, we find evidence that as the centralization of procurement decision making increases, the marginal effect of purchasing complexity on approval times decreases. These findings offer important evidence about how pursuing multiple sustainability objectives affect decision-making efficiency and how decision-making structures might facilitate U.S local governments’ integration of sustainability objectives into their existing internal processes. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Prospects and Challenges of Sustainable Public Purchasing)
Show Figures

Figure 1

19 pages, 5909 KiB  
Article
Assessing the Degree of Sustainability Integration in Canadian Public Sector Procurement
by Monica Da Ponte, Megan Foley and Charles H. Cho
Sustainability 2020, 12(14), 5550; https://doi.org/10.3390/su12145550 - 09 Jul 2020
Cited by 9 | Viewed by 5868
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to identify the current state of sustainability integration into Canadian government procurement and make recommendations on how to deepen current integration in order to accelerate the advancement of existing sustainability goals. We reviewed 50 publicly available Requests [...] Read more.
The purpose of this study was to identify the current state of sustainability integration into Canadian government procurement and make recommendations on how to deepen current integration in order to accelerate the advancement of existing sustainability goals. We reviewed 50 publicly available Requests for Proposals (RFPs) issued between 2016 and 2019 and evaluated the significance of sustainability integration and the expanse of considerations using two measurement schemes. Our analysis suggests that sustainability integration into RFPs is currently superficial with limited integration into the evaluation process. We also found that the integration of sustainability was narrow with significant gaps in the breadth of environmental and social impact areas that were considered. As such, we provide insights and recommendations that will enable governments to accelerate the advancement of sustainability through the use of procurement. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Prospects and Challenges of Sustainable Public Purchasing)
Show Figures

Figure 1

20 pages, 499 KiB  
Article
What Influences Adoption of Green Award Criteria in a Public Contract? An Empirical Analysis of 2018 European Public Procurement Contract Award Notices
by Chunling Yu, Toru Morotomi and Haiping Yu
Sustainability 2020, 12(3), 1261; https://doi.org/10.3390/su12031261 - 10 Feb 2020
Cited by 19 | Viewed by 5128
Abstract
Green public procurement (GPP) is a policy tool aiming to achieve environmental protection and resource reservation via public procurement. After decades of adaptation, what promotes and hinders its uptake in public contracting remains difficult to discern. This research explores factors that influence the [...] Read more.
Green public procurement (GPP) is a policy tool aiming to achieve environmental protection and resource reservation via public procurement. After decades of adaptation, what promotes and hinders its uptake in public contracting remains difficult to discern. This research explores factors that influence the adoption of green award criteria, covering features of procurement procedures, purchasers, tenderers, and the business sectors through empirical analysis of Probit regression combined with a fixed term method. The data is contract award notices (CAN) from 33 countries in Europe in 2018. Our findings suggest that framework agreements, the medical products sector, the health and social services sector, and the business services sector are negatively correlated with whether a contract is green. On the other hand, the contract value, Government Procurement Agreement (GPA)coverage, joint procurement, competitive dialogue, negotiation with competition (with a call for competition), restricted procedure, transport equipment sector, and food sector can positively correlate with green contracts, or these factors increase the possibility of a contract being green. Explicit explanations on these relations are provided. This research identifies factors relating with and influencing the application of green award criteria in public contracts, which would inform public sectors on efficient resources allocation in terms of increasing green public procurement performance. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Prospects and Challenges of Sustainable Public Purchasing)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop