sustainability-logo

Journal Browser

Journal Browser

Sustainable Banking: Issues and Challenges

A special issue of Sustainability (ISSN 2071-1050). This special issue belongs to the section "Economic and Business Aspects of Sustainability".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (31 January 2020) | Viewed by 42014

Special Issue Editors


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Business Economics (ADO), Applied Economics Economic Analysis II and Fundamentals, Rey Juan Carlos University, 28933 Móstoles, Madrid, Spain
Interests: corporate strategy; sustainability; internationalization; family firms; innovation
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Economics, Universidad Pontificia Comillas ICADE, Madrid, Spain
Interests: sustainability; financial inclusion; development; financial markets; responsible investments

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

Banking Services constitute a traditionally pre-eminent sector in the global economy, whether measured by their size, numbers, or influence in world development and other industries. Furthermore, in recent years this industry has received growing attention by practitioners due to the dramatic changes in the competitive environment. In particular, established banks confront strong competitive pressures from new entrants and new customer demands. These trends urge banks to react via sustainability (Bravo et al, 2009; Babic-Hodovic et al, 2011; Pérez & Rodríguez del Bosque, 2013; Walsh et al, 2014; Brammer et al, 2015). Sustainable strategies become a distinctive factor, especially under conditions of increased competition and product standardization (Bhattacharya & Sen, 2004) as is happening in the banking sector (Bravo et al, 2009). In this manner, banks have embraced sustainability as a new competitive arena (Pomering & Dolnicar, 2009).

However, the commitment towards sustainability is not new in the industry. Banking represents one of the most active sectors in sustainability involvement, as early signatories of the Equator Principles, and with a weight of 18% in the Dow Jones Sustainability Global Indexes. Yet, over the past decade banks have strengthened their sustainable actions. Some authors are skeptical of these initiatives, and posit that they are likely prompted by consumer disaffection after the 2008 financial crisis (Pomering & Dolnicar,2009), as sustainable behavior restores or builds bank reputation (Forcadell & Aracil, 2017a; Tran, 2014). Similarly, banks’ sustainable strategies may well be a reaction to the growing influence of non-state stakeholders such as NGOs and highly empowered individuals that pressure the sector to behave according to the Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) criteria and the Triple Bottom Line (Elkington, 1998). Nevertheless, this sector is paramount in the funding of sustainable initiatives (Yip & Bocken, 2018), because banks may pressure their clients to comply with specific social or environmental targets. In this respect, finance may well constitute a key sector that contributes to accelerating advancement in the societal grand challenges (Buckley et al, 2017). Moreover, the banking sector may contribute directly and indirectly to the achievement of the UN’s Sustainable Development Goals—the most ambitious global agenda ever to pursue sustainability. In this respect, even though financial inclusion is not a Goal by itself, it may well favor the accomplishment of the major Goals (Klapper et al, 2016), especially in developing countries (Forcadell & Aracil, 2017b; 2019). Finally, financial digitization has become the main transformation lever of the industry, with the potential to reduce the number of those without access to financial services (Costa & Ehrbeck, 2015).

This Special Issue aims to gather a collection of studies delving into the role that sustainability exerts in the banking sector, and vice-versa. We are particularly interested in how sustainability changes—and challenges—the core business in banking. Additionally, we also encourage studies that analyze how banks can contribute to the sustainability of the planet, that is, financial inclusion strategies based on new payment technologies, the impact that digital banking may have in increasing access to financial products and enhance sustainable development. In addition, we welcome studies that approach banks’ sustainable strategies as part of a multi-stakeholder process and partnerships with state and non-state actors. Finally, contributions may well consider multinational banks from different regions, and how the home and host countries influence their sustainability approach.

We welcome empirical and theoretical studies that aim to understand, accelerate, and materialize the interplay between sustainability and finance. We invite you to submit interdisciplinary and novel research on the issues and challenges associated with sustainable banking.

References

Babić-Hodović, V., Mehić, E., & Arslanagić, M. (2011). Influence of banks’ corporate reputation on organizational buyers perceived value. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 24, 351-360.

Bhattacharya, C. B., & Sen, S. (2004). Doing better at doing good: When, why, and how consumers respond to corporate social initiatives. California management review47(1), 9-24.

Brammer, S., Agarwal, V., Taffler, R., & Brown, M. (2015). Corporate Reputation and Financial Performance: The Interaction between Capability and Character. In European Financial Management Association. 2015 Annual Meeting: The Netherlands.

Bravo, R., Montaner, T., & Pina, J. M. (2009). The role of bank image for customers versus non-customers. International Journal of Bank Marketing27(4), 315-334.

Buckley, P. J., Doh, J. P., & Benischke, M. H. (2017). Towards a renaissance in international business research? Big questions, grand challenges, and the future of IB scholarship. Journal of International Business Studies48(9), 1045-1064.

Costa, A., & Ehrbeck, T. (2015). A market-building approach to financial inclusion. Innovations: Technology, Governance, Globalization10(1-2), 53-59.

Elkington, J. (1998). Partnerships from cannibals with forks: The triple bottom line of 21st century business. Environmental Quality Management, 8(1), 37-51.

Forcadell, F.J., & Aracil, E. (2017a). European Banks' Reputation for Corporate Social Responsibility. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 24(1), 1-14.

Forcadell, F.J., & Aracil, E. (2017b). Sustainable banking in Latin American developing countries: leading to (mutual) prosperity. Business Ethics: A European Review, 26(4), 382-395.

Forcadell, F. J., & Aracil, E. (2019). Can multinational companies foster institutional change and sustainable development in emerging countries? A case study. Business Strategy & Development (forthcoming).

Klapper, E., El-Zoghbi, M. & Hess, J. (2016). Achieving the Sustainable Development Goals. The role of financial inclusion. United Nations and Consultative Group to Assist the Poor. Washington. USA.

Pérez, A., & Rodríguez del Bosque, I. (2013). How customer support for corporate social responsibility influences the image of companies: Evidence from the banking industry. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 22(3), 155-168.

Pomering, A., & Dolnicar, S. (2009). Assessing the prerequisite of successful CSR implementation: are consumers aware of CSR initiatives?. Journal of Business Ethics85(2), 285-301.

Tran, Y. (2014). CSR in the banking sector. A literature review and new research directions. International Journal of Economics, Commerce and Management, 11 (2), 1-22.

Walsh, G., Bartikowski, B., & Beatty, S. E. (2014). Impact of customer‐based corporate reputation on non‐monetary and monetary outcomes: The roles of commitment and service context risk. British Journal of Management25(2), 166-185.

Prof. Francisco Javier Forcadell
Dr. Elisa Aracil
Guest Editor

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Sustainability is an international peer-reviewed open access semimonthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2400 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • sustainability
  • corporate social responsibility
  • banking
  • financial inclusion
  • SDG

Published Papers (9 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

18 pages, 598 KiB  
Article
Proposing a Multidimensional Bankruptcy Prediction Model: An Approach for Sustainable Islamic Banking
by Mehreen Mehreen, Maran Marimuthu, Samsul Ariffin Abdul Karim and Amin Jan
Sustainability 2020, 12(8), 3226; https://doi.org/10.3390/su12083226 - 16 Apr 2020
Cited by 8 | Viewed by 3382
Abstract
The main purpose of this study is to conceptualize a sustainable banking model for Islamic banking by blending three essential business aspects namely financial performance, Islamic corporate governance, and sustainability practices dimension. In the case of Islamic banking, evidence shows that a Shariah-based [...] Read more.
The main purpose of this study is to conceptualize a sustainable banking model for Islamic banking by blending three essential business aspects namely financial performance, Islamic corporate governance, and sustainability practices dimension. In the case of Islamic banking, evidence shows that a Shariah-based bankruptcy prediction model for apprehending the true bankruptcy prediction is over-sighted. This study offers an efficient Shariah-based bankruptcy prediction model by first, reviewing the previously applied conventional bankruptcy prediction models; secondly, by developing and proposing a robust, multidimensional model for predicting bankruptcy in Islamic banking. This framework may have profound implications on the existing bankruptcy evaluation structure of the Islamic banking industry and may provide a strong sustainability management guideline to the global Islamic banking industry. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Sustainable Banking: Issues and Challenges)
Show Figures

Figure 1

17 pages, 271 KiB  
Article
Main Factors for Understanding High Impacts on CSR Dimensions in the Finance Industry
by Belen Lopez, Alfonso Torres, Alberto Ruozzi and Jose Antonio Vicente
Sustainability 2020, 12(6), 2395; https://doi.org/10.3390/su12062395 - 19 Mar 2020
Cited by 11 | Viewed by 3388
Abstract
The objective of this study is to explore empirically the dimensions that generate high impact in the finance industry to better understand its contribution from a Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) perspective. We analyze data concerning impacts of finance sector firms certified by B [...] Read more.
The objective of this study is to explore empirically the dimensions that generate high impact in the finance industry to better understand its contribution from a Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) perspective. We analyze data concerning impacts of finance sector firms certified by B Corp in order to identify the combinations that are necessary and/or sufficient to obtain a recognition of their high impact generation. The methodology followed to identify the impact dimensions is fsQCA, (fuzzy set Qualitative Comparative Analysis), a qualitative comparative analysis method applied to a sample of finance firms (n-181). The results indicate that financial sector firms exhibited four combinations focusing on different impact dimensions. Specifically, the first route indicates that a high degree of focus on customers and communities is sufficient to obtain a high impact score. The second path signals that the combination of the impacts on customers and corporate governance could lead to the same result, while in the third pathway the focus would be on the employees. Finally, the fourth route indicates that some financial firms focus strongly on their communities, corporate governance and their employees, but very weakly on the environmental dimension. Consequently, diverse combinations of CSR dimensions characterize financial sector contributions to impact generation and sustainable development. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Sustainable Banking: Issues and Challenges)
19 pages, 544 KiB  
Article
Does Technological Innovation Drive Corporate Sustainability? Empirical Evidence for the European Financial Industry in Catching-Up and Central and Eastern Europe Countries
by Francisca Sempere-Ripoll, Sofia Estelles-Miguel, Ronald Rojas-Alvarado and Jose-Luis Hervas-Oliver
Sustainability 2020, 12(6), 2261; https://doi.org/10.3390/su12062261 - 13 Mar 2020
Cited by 17 | Viewed by 3173
Abstract
In the financial industry, two relationships are well-researched: (i) innovation and financial performance and, (ii) sustainability and financial performance, both focused primarily on Western and advanced countries. The relationship between innovation and sustainability, however, is underresearched. This study’s purpose consists of determining whether [...] Read more.
In the financial industry, two relationships are well-researched: (i) innovation and financial performance and, (ii) sustainability and financial performance, both focused primarily on Western and advanced countries. The relationship between innovation and sustainability, however, is underresearched. This study’s purpose consists of determining whether there is a relationship between innovation and corporate sustainability in the financial industry. In doing so, this study responds to a critical question: are the most innovative firms also the most sustainability-oriented? We empirically explore sustainability-oriented innovation in the financial industry of 11 catching-up countries in Central and Eastern Europe (CEE). Using Community Innovation Survey (CIS) data for 2012–2014, this study empirically analyzes a large sample of 1574 firms in the financial industry. Our results suggest that innovation is positively linked to corporate sustainability, pointing out that innovation capabilities are positively related to sustainability. Our study proposes a framework for analyzing innovation and sustainability from a capability-perspective. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Sustainable Banking: Issues and Challenges)
Show Figures

Figure 1

23 pages, 1242 KiB  
Article
Eco-Banking in Relation to Financial Performance of the Sector—The Evidence from Poland
by Justyna Zabawa and Cyprian Kozyra
Sustainability 2020, 12(6), 2162; https://doi.org/10.3390/su12062162 - 11 Mar 2020
Cited by 10 | Viewed by 3101
Abstract
With the advent of corporate social responsibility, practical aspects of environmental responsibility have gained importance and recognition among both manufacturing and service enterprises, including financial services. This trend is also evidenced extensively in the literature. On the other hand, the literature reveals a [...] Read more.
With the advent of corporate social responsibility, practical aspects of environmental responsibility have gained importance and recognition among both manufacturing and service enterprises, including financial services. This trend is also evidenced extensively in the literature. On the other hand, the literature reveals a significant gap in the research into the matter of environmental responsibility of banks in the light of their financial effectiveness. In addition, the European Union (EU) regulations require banking entities to provide reports of any activities related to protection of natural resources. Two important dilemmas arise in this context—how to measure the environmental involvement of the banking sector and how to relate this type of involvement to the sector’s financial effectiveness? We applied Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP), linear ordering methods—standardized sum method and synthetic measure of development, Pearson’s and Spearman’s correlation coefficients, Student’s t and Mann-Whitney U tests and boxplots to measure environmental responsibility of banks and to examine the empirical relationship between environmental engagement and bank financial performance data. We also used analytical methods for the study of financial and non-financial reports of banks. We posited three research hypotheses related to measurement of environmental involvement of banks (ecologization) and to correlations between the sector’s financial effectiveness and its environmental involvement. The study does not confirm any direct influence of banks’ financial results upon the scale of their environmental involvement. Based on the above, the we also made an attempt at explaining the results and identifying directions of further research into the subject. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Sustainable Banking: Issues and Challenges)
Show Figures

Figure 1

13 pages, 405 KiB  
Article
Sustainable Banking: New Forms of Investing under the Umbrella of the 2030 Agenda
by Mariano Méndez-Suárez, Abel Monfort and Fernando Gallardo
Sustainability 2020, 12(5), 2096; https://doi.org/10.3390/su12052096 - 09 Mar 2020
Cited by 20 | Viewed by 4810
Abstract
(1) Social Impact Bonds (SIBs) foster the relationships between public and private sectors while adding value to new forms of investment that are closely linked to Socially Responsible Investments (SRIs). In this context, Sustainable Developments Goals (SDGs) aim to strengthen global partnerships in [...] Read more.
(1) Social Impact Bonds (SIBs) foster the relationships between public and private sectors while adding value to new forms of investment that are closely linked to Socially Responsible Investments (SRIs). In this context, Sustainable Developments Goals (SDGs) aim to strengthen global partnerships in order to achieve the 2030 Agenda. Sustainable banking should consider its role in both new responsible investment products and the 2030 Agenda. This study aims to: (i) estimate the ROI of SIBS, (ii) define a financial formulation and a measurement system, and (iii) explain the relationship between SIBs and SDGs. (2) This research analyzes SIBs from an SDG approach, and proposes a valuation model based on a financial options valuation methodology that clarifies the financial value of the world’s first SIB (Peterborough Prison, UK). (3) Findings suggest that investors expect to have a negative return of 16.48%, and that this expected loss may be compensated for by the short- and long-term positive impact of an intervention in society. (4) It is shown that SIBs provide an opportunity to reach SDG 17 and improve sustainable investment portfolios, while providing an opportunity to strengthen a company’s Corporate Social Responsibility policy and its corporate reputation. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Sustainable Banking: Issues and Challenges)
Show Figures

Figure 1

22 pages, 3207 KiB  
Article
Optimize the Banker’s Multi-Stage Decision-Making and the Mechanism of Pay Contract Influencing on Bank Default Risk in the Long-Term Model
by Tianyi Ma, Minghui Jiang and Xuchuan Yuan
Sustainability 2020, 12(4), 1400; https://doi.org/10.3390/su12041400 - 14 Feb 2020
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 2431
Abstract
In recent years, researchers have been devoted to illustrating the correlation between bankers’ pay contracts and a bank’s risk-taking behavior where corporate governance is concerned, especially throughout the past four decades and by using empirical analysis. Despite being a widespread concern, the causality [...] Read more.
In recent years, researchers have been devoted to illustrating the correlation between bankers’ pay contracts and a bank’s risk-taking behavior where corporate governance is concerned, especially throughout the past four decades and by using empirical analysis. Despite being a widespread concern, the causality of this relationship is not thoroughly understood. We initiate this research by modeling bankers’ multi-stage decisions of option investment and bond investment from the perspective of theoretical analysis, and by analyzing the function image results using data from Wells Fargo & Co. from the ExecuComp, BvD Orbis, and CRSP-COMPUSTAT databases. We aim to deeply explore the mechanism of how compensation influencing on risk. We are the first to find that it has a “risk cap”, which is the optimal risk level to maximize the return of decision-making. We are also the first to discover the optimal decision coefficient level to maximize the decision return, during which the internal causes and mechanisms of the impact of bankers’ compensation on a bank’s default risk are revealed. We also illustrate the influence of the number of periods. We expect our findings to provide advice for establishing policies when designing pay contracts. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Sustainable Banking: Issues and Challenges)
Show Figures

Figure 1

21 pages, 353 KiB  
Article
Sustainable Banking: The Role of Multilateral Development Banks as Norm Entrepreneurs
by Alvaro Mendez and David Patrick Houghton
Sustainability 2020, 12(3), 972; https://doi.org/10.3390/su12030972 - 29 Jan 2020
Cited by 22 | Viewed by 9072
Abstract
This article explores the role of multilateral development banks (MDBs) in originating norms of sustainable banking that have attracted and supported green private finance, a role not widely known in the management literature. Any prospect of achieving the United Nations (UN) Sustainable Development [...] Read more.
This article explores the role of multilateral development banks (MDBs) in originating norms of sustainable banking that have attracted and supported green private finance, a role not widely known in the management literature. Any prospect of achieving the United Nations (UN) Sustainable Development Goals by 2030 presupposes mobilizing the estimated US$23.3 trillion currently locked-up in risk-averse private savings to bridge the gap between developing countries’ demand for capital and the current global financial architecture’s capacity to supply it. The three biggest obstacles to sustainable banking identified by the authors are discussed: (1) The uncertain bankability of projects; (2) non-transparency in tracking sustainable capital flows; and (3) no universal mechanism capable of making matches between green investment supply and demand; and what MDBs have actually done to overcome these roadblocks, and might do in future, is also discussed. Seen through the lens of “applied constructivism”, MDBs are revealed to be norm entrepreneurs proactive since at least the 1970s in socially constructing most of the basic norms and practices of sustainable banking which the private sector relies on or is now striving to take up. MDBs are typically the first “port of call” for international governmental organizations (IGOs) and civil society organizations wishing to establish a sustainable financial framework for development; and are the likeliest political agents to pioneer sustainable banking in future. MDBs would do well to develop an awareness of the methods of Constructivism, which they have actually been unwittingly using, to empower themselves to meet the challenges of the 21st century. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Sustainable Banking: Issues and Challenges)
23 pages, 3440 KiB  
Article
A Systematic Review of Sustainable Banking through a Co-Word Analysis
by Juan J. Nájera-Sánchez
Sustainability 2020, 12(1), 278; https://doi.org/10.3390/su12010278 - 30 Dec 2019
Cited by 38 | Viewed by 5893
Abstract
The 2008 financial crisis placed banks in the gaze of public opinion. Financial entities did not delay in reacting, intensifying their efforts in what had become known as sustainable banking, with the goal of counteracting the negative effects of their loss of reputation. [...] Read more.
The 2008 financial crisis placed banks in the gaze of public opinion. Financial entities did not delay in reacting, intensifying their efforts in what had become known as sustainable banking, with the goal of counteracting the negative effects of their loss of reputation. Neither has the academic community delayed their reaction, with the rapid growth of scientific production around this topic. However, no review of this literature through qualitative methods or bibliometry exists. The work presented in this paper fills one of those gaps, setting up a statistical description of the principal features of sustainable banking research and carrying out an analysis about its knowledge structure via co-word analysis. The results show a rapid evolution of the topics addressed, highlighting studies about the consequences of banks’ sustainability programs on their competitiveness. Future trends point to the search for more complex models, the incorporation of new stakeholders in the analysis and the consideration of different contexts. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Sustainable Banking: Issues and Challenges)
Show Figures

Figure 1

26 pages, 4498 KiB  
Article
Pay Me Later is Not Always Positively Associated with Bank Risk Reduction—From the Perspective of Long-Term Compensation and Black Box Effect
by Tianyi Ma, Minghui Jiang and Xuchuan Yuan
Sustainability 2020, 12(1), 35; https://doi.org/10.3390/su12010035 - 18 Dec 2019
Cited by 5 | Viewed by 2317
Abstract
The relationship between executive compensation and bank risk-taking is one of the core topics of corporate governance theory. Especially after the 2008 global financial crisis, due to the characteristics of banks, such as systemic risk, this relationship has become more important. However, though [...] Read more.
The relationship between executive compensation and bank risk-taking is one of the core topics of corporate governance theory. Especially after the 2008 global financial crisis, due to the characteristics of banks, such as systemic risk, this relationship has become more important. However, though usually calculated on the basis of cash salary and inside equity, which can promote risk incentives, inside debt was considered a tool for risk reduction in prior empirical analyses. Based on actual bank situations, we had doubts about this relationship and wanted to verify the specific relationship between inside debt and risk. We initiated this research by setting up a theoretical model between inside debt and bank default risk and by simulating the result using data from Wells Fargo & Co. to draw the function image. We are the first to define the three kinds of compensation in three dimensions. Then, considering bankruptcy, we found the black box effect exists. Therefore, different from prior views, pay me later not only reduces but also increases risk. We expect our findings to offer help to the formulation of policies for pay contracts. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Sustainable Banking: Issues and Challenges)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop