Special Issue "Food and Agricultural Security"

A special issue of Sustainability (ISSN 2071-1050). This special issue belongs to the section "Sustainable Agriculture".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: 30 September 2021.

Special Issue Editors

Prof. Adesoji O. Adelaja
E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Agricultural, Food and Resource Economics, College of Agriculture and Natural Resources, Michigan State University
Interests: agricultural and food policy; conflict and development; land policy; place strategy; terrorism
Prof. Dr. Justin George Kappiaruparampil
E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Agricultural, Food, and Resource Economics, Michigan State University, East Lansing, USA
Interests: development economics

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

“Food Security” can be defined as a state when all people, at all times, have physical and economic access to sufficient, safe and nutritious food that meets their dietary needs and food preferences for an active and healthy life” (FAO 1996). In addition to being essential to human existence, food security is fundamental to achieving economic growth, job creation, poverty reduction and global security. For the same reason, the United Nations has made achieving “zero hunger” an integral part of its Sustainable Development Goals 2030 (SDG) (SDG #2).

Despite major efforts by national governments and multinational agencies, achieving food security remains a major challenge in many developing countries. According to FAO estimates, in 2019, the total number of moderately and severely food insecure people globally totaled 2 billion (FAO et al. 2020). Of these, 1.03 billion live in Asia, 675 million in Africa and 205 million in Latin America and the Caribbean. The estimates of current prevalence of undernourishment tell a similar story. In 2019, nearly 690 million people were undernourished globally, which is approximately 8.9% of the total population (FAO et al. 2020). Among them, 250 million people were in Africa (19.1% of Africa’s population), 381 million in Asia (8.3% of Asia’s population) and 48 million in Latin America and the Caribbean (7.4% of the population).

A major way to achieve food security is to eradicate poverty (SDG #1), given that the former is often caused by the latter. The African continent is a prime example of places where both poverty and food insecurity coexist in their worst forms. According to FAO estimates, Africa is significantly off-track in achieving the zero-hunger target in 2030. By 2030, it is estimated that the prevalence of undernourishment in the region will increase from the current rate of 19.1% to 25.7%. This is primarily attributed to the poor plight of Small Holder Farmers (SHFs), who produce around 80% of the total food consumed in Africa (FAO 2011). Given that a major way to achieve the SDG of zero hunger is by increasing agricultural productivity and facilitating sustainable food production (United Nations 2016), transforming the agricultural sector, enhancing production efficiencies and creating opportunities for vulnerable SHFs and others working in food systems are policy priorities.

Food Security Challenges

Major barriers to the achievement of food security (SDG#2) include poverty (SDG#1), lack of access to health (SDG#3), lack of access to education (SDG#4) and inadequate infrastructure (SGD#9). In addition to these traditional barriers, emerging threats covered by other SDGs such as armed conflicts, climate change, pandemics and novel economic shocks also pose significant threats to food security. For example, most of the recent increase in food insecurity can be attributed to the increasing number of armed conflicts, often exacerbated by climate-related shocks (FAO et al. 2020). More than half of all undernourished people in the world live in countries struggling with conflict, violence and fragility (FAO et al. 2017). The growing number of armed conflicts in Sub-Saharan Africa, especially in Burundi, the Central African Republic, Côte D’Ivoire, the Democratic Republic of Congo, Libya, Mali, Nigeria and South Sudan, have contributed to the increase in food insecurity in the region (FAO et al. 2020; ACLED 2019). Armed conflicts, when unabated for long periods of time, impair all dimensions of food security, from the ability to access food to the availability of supplies and the livelihoods of rural communities, along with the production chains that ensure the distribution of food (George, Adelaja, and Weatherspoon 2019; FAO et al. 2020).

The lack of resilience and adaptive capacity to climate-related hazards and natural disasters (SDG#13) also pose challenges to the achievement of food security. Climate-related shocks affect the availability of and access to key resources such as land and water, thereby causing significant negative impacts on crop yields (IPCC 2007). Economic shocks also contribute to food insecurity. For example, food security challenges have been attributed to domestic and global economic shocks (Akter and Basher 2014; Kavallari, Fellmann, and Gay 2014; Brinkman et al. 2010). Most recently, the emergence of the COVID-19 pandemic has worsened the food insecurity conditions in many countries (ILO 2020). Preliminary assessments suggest that the recent COVID-19 pandemic may add between 83 to 132 million people to the total number of undernourished people in 2020 (FAO et al. 2020).

Impacts of Shocks to Food Security

The challenges posed by conflicts, climate challenges and economic shocks have been well investigated in recent literature (Adelaja and George 2019a; George, Adelaja, and Weatherspoon 2019; Adelaja and George 2019b; Buhaug et al. 2015; Hsiang, Burke, and Miguel 2013). However, very little is known about some of the emerging new threats to food and agricultural security. The list of emerging and continuing threats that the literature has not adequately empirically addressed includes (1) recent forced displacement, (2) recent major health epidemics and pandemics, (3) recent special economic shocks (for countries that are natural-resource-dependent) and (4) recent political instability (for countries experiencing unusual political problems). Key to sustainability is the development of resilience and adaptive capacity to withstand the current and emerging shocks.

Proposed Focus of Special Issue

The proposed Special Issue of Sustainability will focus on the emerging threats and shocks to food and agricultural security in SSA, specifically the threats related to armed conflicts, forced displacements, pandemics, emerging economic challenges and possible political challenges. As co-editors, we shall attract leading scholars to produce new scholarship aimed at filling the gap in the literature, advancing knowledge about new threats, and providing insights on policy and strategy solutions to dealing with such threats.

Prof. Adesoji O. Adelaja
Prof. Dr. Justin George Kappiaruparampil
Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All papers will be peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Sustainability is an international peer-reviewed open access semimonthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 1900 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Published Papers (5 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

Jump to: Other

Article
Food Self-Sufficiency of the SEE Countries; Is the Region Prepared for a Future Crisis?
Sustainability 2021, 13(16), 8747; https://doi.org/10.3390/su13168747 - 05 Aug 2021
Viewed by 269
Abstract
Although the concept of self-sufficiency has been accepted both in developed and developing countries, alternated with periods of its rejections, the food crisis from 2007/08 and COVID-19 pandemic returned focus to the availability of countries to be self-sufficient in food production. Considering the [...] Read more.
Although the concept of self-sufficiency has been accepted both in developed and developing countries, alternated with periods of its rejections, the food crisis from 2007/08 and COVID-19 pandemic returned focus to the availability of countries to be self-sufficient in food production. Considering the concerns over ensuring food security in many countries, the main objective of this paper is to estimate the ability to fulfill the feed demand of the population in the eight countries of South-East Europe (SEE), which is in crisis conditions, such as pandemic especially important. In that context, the food self-sufficiency ratio (SSR) is calculated for total food production, as well as for different food groups. The next step in the methodological framework was to estimate the influence of different factors on the self-sufficiency ratio, as it depends on natural, financial, economic, and political factors. The results show that the SEE region expresses a high level of SSR in food, so it shows that the region is quite ready to respond to the challenges posed by the crisis. However, as the SEE region is a group of very different countries, regional cooperation should be strengthened as food production is considered. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Food and Agricultural Security)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Article
Producers’ Perceptions of Public Good Agricultural Practices Standard and Their Pesticide Use: The Case of Q-GAP for Cabbage Farming in Chiang Mai Province, Thailand
Sustainability 2021, 13(11), 6333; https://doi.org/10.3390/su13116333 - 03 Jun 2021
Viewed by 870
Abstract
This study examined the effectiveness of Thailand’s Q-GAP initiative in raising cabbage farmers’ awareness regarding food safety assurance and improving their pesticide use practices by comparing 41 Q-GAP-certified and 90 uncertified farmers in Chiang Mai Province, Thailand. The research methods included a questionnaire [...] Read more.
This study examined the effectiveness of Thailand’s Q-GAP initiative in raising cabbage farmers’ awareness regarding food safety assurance and improving their pesticide use practices by comparing 41 Q-GAP-certified and 90 uncertified farmers in Chiang Mai Province, Thailand. The research methods included a questionnaire survey administered to the participating farmers and laboratory pesticide residue testing of their cabbage produce samples. The research found that certified farmers had a significantly more heedful attitude than uncertified farmers toward the effects of pesticide use on the users, consumers, and the environment. This is supported by the higher level of Q-GAP training experiences. Compared to uncertified farmers, a significantly lower proportion of certified farmers also applied either insecticide, fungicide, or herbicide, with significantly less frequencies when including in the analysis those who did not use the particular pesticide. In the pesticide residue analysis, no significant difference was found between the two types of farms regarding the number of farms detected with maximum residue level exceedance in the sample produce and regarding the results of the aggregate organophosphate pesticide analysis. However, it was found that the produce of the uncertified farmers contained significantly more residue in the aggregate synthetic pyrethroid pesticide analysis as compared to that of the certified farmers. These findings indicate the Q-GAP-certified farmers’ progress in process control from earlier Q-GAP studies on compliance. However, considering the limited achievements of certified farmers in pesticide handling and recordkeeping, and those of the Department of Agriculture officers in auditing, there is a need for more governmental efforts, especially in these areas. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Food and Agricultural Security)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Article
Forced Displacement and Agriculture: Implications for Host Communities
Sustainability 2021, 13(10), 5728; https://doi.org/10.3390/su13105728 - 20 May 2021
Viewed by 388
Abstract
The disruptive effects of conflict and climate-related shocks and their tendencies to cause human population displacements are well documented in the literature. Given the growing number of internally displaced persons (IDPs) worldwide and the resulting population and service demand overload in host communities, [...] Read more.
The disruptive effects of conflict and climate-related shocks and their tendencies to cause human population displacements are well documented in the literature. Given the growing number of internally displaced persons (IDPs) worldwide and the resulting population and service demand overload in host communities, it is important to understand the socioeconomic impacts. Because many host communities in developing countries are agriculture dependent, we investigate what happens to key agricultural sector outcomes in host communities when there is an influx of IDPs. For displacements caused by insurgency, communal clashes, and natural disasters, we estimate the impacts on agricultural outputs, employment, wages, and land use. We find that forced displacements generally result in reduced agricultural production due to lower land and labor productivity. Specifically, while the effect of insurgency-driven IDP influx is negative, it is positive for communal violence. Cassava, potatoes, and soya are particularly hard hit. Additionally, while insurgency-driven population influx reduces the agricultural wages of both males and females, it increases the reliance on male and female household labor but has no effect on hired labor. Finally, while insurgency-driven IDP influx does not affect land use and land market activities, it lowers the expected value of land and the number of farm plots harvested. We highlight the opportunity to leverage humanitarian assistance in building local agricultural capacity in host communities. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Food and Agricultural Security)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Article
Species Richness and Carbon Footprints of Vegetable Oils: Can High Yields Outweigh Palm Oil’s Environmental Impact?
Sustainability 2021, 13(4), 1813; https://doi.org/10.3390/su13041813 - 08 Feb 2021
Viewed by 684
Abstract
Palm oil has been widely criticised for its high environmental impacts, leading to calls to replace it with alternative vegetable oils in food and cosmetic products. However, substituting palm oil would be environmentally beneficial only if the environmental footprint per litre oil were [...] Read more.
Palm oil has been widely criticised for its high environmental impacts, leading to calls to replace it with alternative vegetable oils in food and cosmetic products. However, substituting palm oil would be environmentally beneficial only if the environmental footprint per litre oil were lower than those of alternative vegetable oils. Whether this is the case is not obvious, given the high oil yields of oil palm of up to 10 times those of alternative crops. Here, we combine global agricultural and environmental datasets to show that, among the world’s seven major vegetable oil crops (oil palm, soybean, rapeseed, sunflower, groundnut, coconut, olive), oil palm has the lowest average species richness and carbon footprint associated with an annual production of one litre of vegetable oil. For each crop, these yield-adjusted footprints differ substantially between major producer countries, which we find to be largely the result of differences in crop management. Closing agricultural yield gaps of oil crops through improved management practices would significantly reduce the environmental footprints per oil yield. This would minimise the need for further land conversion to oil cropland and indeed could increase production to such an extent that a significant area of oil croplands could be ecologically restored. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Food and Agricultural Security)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Other

Jump to: Research

Perspective
Bottom-Up Transformation of Agriculture and Food Systems
Sustainability 2021, 13(4), 2171; https://doi.org/10.3390/su13042171 - 18 Feb 2021
Cited by 3 | Viewed by 1346
Abstract
The global agenda for sustainable development includes the alleviation of poverty and hunger by developing sustainable agriculture and food systems. Intensive farming systems and its variations, such as sustainable intensification or ecological intensification, are currently being promoted as technologies that can improve agricultural [...] Read more.
The global agenda for sustainable development includes the alleviation of poverty and hunger by developing sustainable agriculture and food systems. Intensive farming systems and its variations, such as sustainable intensification or ecological intensification, are currently being promoted as technologies that can improve agricultural productivity and reduce environmental impacts. However, these are focused only on per-hectare productivity with growing negative impacts on local culture and the environment. This study identifies the negative impacts of crop- and livestock-based farming systems on the Indo-Gangetic plains, as well as in the USA, China, and South America as an example of key challenges in global agriculture. These impacts are classified into environmental, social, economic, and health impacts. An alternative paradigm is proposed to overcome some of the shortcomings of current global agriculture. This new bottom-up paradigm is based on three indicators that are fundamental to achieve the environmental, economic, and social sustainability of agriculture and food systems. These are divided into technical, geographic, and social indicators and have been analysed for four farming systems—low-input, high-input, organic, and desired farming systems. Seven global geographic regions have been analysed in terms of their socio-economic indicators and status of agriculture in order to develop pathways for the implementation of the new paradigm. The pathway for change suggested in this paper includes a focus on research and training, policy and institutional changes, and an evaluation of the costs and benefits, and changes in production models that consider scale and sustainability metrics and include innovations in consultation with all stakeholders. This new paradigm has the potential to direct global efforts towards more local and regional solutions, which are community driven and constitute a ‘bottom-up’ approach. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Food and Agricultural Security)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop