sustainability-logo

Journal Browser

Journal Browser

State of the Art of Assessment for Sustainable Development Goals—3rd Edition

A special issue of Sustainability (ISSN 2071-1050). This special issue belongs to the section "Sustainable Urban and Rural Development".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: 31 January 2027 | Viewed by 2695

Special Issue Editor


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
College of Environmental Science and Engineering, Nankai University, Tianjin, China
Interests: sustainable development practice; assessment for sustainable development goals; environmental planning; environmental management; environmental impact assessment
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

The world is facing a multitude of major challenges; a global sustainable development model is needed to guide countries towards an inclusive, green, resilient, and shared future. In September 2015, the United Nations General Assembly adopted a Resolution called Transforming Our World: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development, which includes 17 global Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). The core of the SDGs lies in how to implement them well, which needs to be fully explored from the aspects of progress assessment, policy design, action, and local practice.

The Special Issue is called State of the Art of Assessment for Sustainable Development Goals—3rd Edition. The goal of this Special Issue is to publicize and recommend the actions and effects of SDG promotion in various countries and regions around the world, and to explore the theoretical and practical experience of SDG localization.

This Special Issue is open to any subject area related to the assessment of sustainable development goals. The listed keywords suggest just a few of the many possibilities.

  • Methods for assessing the progress of SDGs in areas such as population, resources, environment, and economy;
  • Identification and analysis of key issues and factors affecting the SDGs;
  • The Future of the SDGs of the Post-2030 Sustainable Development Agenda;
  • Measures and methods for accelerating the implementation of the SDGs goals;
  • Sharing of Best Practices in SDGs;
  • SDG localization theory;
  • Urban sustainable development;
  • Sustainable cities and communities;
  • SDG progress assessment;
  • Creating enabling policies to mobilize financial resources;
  • Building policy implementation capacity;
  • Monitoring and evaluating policy performance

Prof. Dr. Chaofeng Shao
Guest Editor

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 250 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for assessment.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Sustainability is an international peer-reviewed open access semimonthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2400 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • methods for assessing the progress of SDGs in areas such as population, resources, environment, and economy
  • identification and analysis of key issues and factors affecting the SDGs
  • the future of the SDGs of the post-2030 sustainable development agenda
  • measures and methods for accelerating the implementation of the SDGs goals
  • sharing of best practices in SDGs
  • SDG localization theory
  • urban sustainable development
  • sustainable cities and communities
  • SDG progress assessment
  • policies to mobilize financial resources
  • policy implementation capacity
  • policy performance evaluation

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

  • Ease of navigation: Grouping papers by topic helps scholars navigate broad scope journals more efficiently.
  • Greater discoverability: Special Issues support the reach and impact of scientific research. Articles in Special Issues are more discoverable and cited more frequently.
  • Expansion of research network: Special Issues facilitate connections among authors, fostering scientific collaborations.
  • External promotion: Articles in Special Issues are often promoted through the journal's social media, increasing their visibility.
  • Reprint: MDPI Books provides the opportunity to republish successful Special Issues in book format, both online and in print.

Further information on MDPI's Special Issue policies can be found here.

Related Special Issue

Published Papers (2 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

20 pages, 1055 KB  
Article
Assessing Progress and Disparities in SDG Performance Across EU Countries: Evidence from a Taxonomy-Based Approach
by Julia Koralun-Bereźnicka, Ewa Majerowska and Beata Bieszk-Stolorz
Sustainability 2026, 18(7), 3487; https://doi.org/10.3390/su18073487 - 2 Apr 2026
Viewed by 508
Abstract
This paper examines the evolution of Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) performance among European Union (EU) countries from 2000 to 2024 using a taxonomy-based approach. It aims to identify changes in sustainability performance, investigate regional disparities between Western Europe (WE) and Eastern Europe (EE), [...] Read more.
This paper examines the evolution of Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) performance among European Union (EU) countries from 2000 to 2024 using a taxonomy-based approach. It aims to identify changes in sustainability performance, investigate regional disparities between Western Europe (WE) and Eastern Europe (EE), and assess progress across the social, economic, and environmental dimensions. A panel dataset comprising multiple SDG indicators was employed, with variables aggregated into the Taxonomic Measure of Sustainable Development (TMSD). Based on this measure, countries were classified into performance categories—pioneers, challengers, below-average performers, and underperformers—allowing for the analysis of long-term structural trends. The results indicate an overall improvement in SDG performance across the EU, reflected in an increasing share of countries classified as pioneers and a declining share of underperformers. WE countries more often occupy higher performance categories, although the gap with EE has recently narrowed. Progress is found to be uneven across SDG dimensions, with more pronounced improvements in the economic and environmental areas than in the social dimension. The study contributes by providing a comprehensive and longitudinal assessment of SDG implementation in the EU over a 25-year period, identifying persistent regional disparities, and supporting systematic monitoring and policy coordination at the European level. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

27 pages, 1021 KB  
Article
Sustainable Development Agenda: Historical Evolution, Goal Progression, and Future Prospects
by Chaofeng Shao, Sihan Chen and Xuesong Zhan
Sustainability 2026, 18(2), 948; https://doi.org/10.3390/su18020948 - 16 Jan 2026
Viewed by 1771
Abstract
The concept of sustainable development has emerged as a global consensus, forged in response to environmental constraints and critical reflection on conventional growth-oriented paradigms. It now serves as the overarching framework for addressing climate, ecological, and socio-economic crises. In the period after the [...] Read more.
The concept of sustainable development has emerged as a global consensus, forged in response to environmental constraints and critical reflection on conventional growth-oriented paradigms. It now serves as the overarching framework for addressing climate, ecological, and socio-economic crises. In the period after the adoption of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) in 2016, there was an observable trend of increased integration of these objectives into the strategic frameworks of national and subnational entities. However, global assessments have indicated a divergence between the progress achieved and the trajectory delineated by the SDGs. The Earth system is demonstrating signs of decreased resilience, with widening inequalities and the emergence of multiple crises, thereby hindering the implementation of the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. As the 2030 deadline approaches, a fundamental question arises for global development governance: what should be the future of the SDGs beyond 2030? While insufficient progress has prompted debates over the adequacy of the SDG framework, fundamentally revising or replacing the SDGs would risk undermining a hard-won international consensus forged through decades of negotiation and institutional investment. Based on a comprehensive review of the historical evolution of the sustainable development concept, this study argues that the SDGs represent a rare and fragile achievement in global governance. While insufficient progress has sparked debates about their effectiveness, fundamentally revising or replacing the SDGs would jeopardize the hard-won international consensus forged through decades of negotiations and institutional investments. This study further analyzes the latest progress on the SDGs and identifies emerging risks, aiming to explore how to accelerate and optimize sustainable development pathways within the existing SDG framework rather than propose a new global goal system. Based on both global experience and practice in China, four interconnected strategic priorities—namely, economic reform, social equity, environmental justice, and technology sharing—are proposed as a comprehensive framework to accelerate SDG implementation and guide the transformation of development pathways towards a more just, low-carbon, and resilient future. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop