Religious Conflict and Coexistence in Korea

A special issue of Religions (ISSN 2077-1444).

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (20 December 2024) | Viewed by 9827

Special Issue Editors


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Religious Studies, Seoul National University, Seoul, Republic of Korea
Interests: Asian religion (Confucianism and Buddhism); Korean religion and philosophy; religious education; cosmopolitanism
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
College of Humanities, Seoul National University, 1 Gwanak-ro, Gwanak-gu, Seoul, Republic of Korea
Interests: comparative religion; Korean shamanism; religion and mythology; Korean christianity
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

As human beings, we are ceaselessly in pursuit of avenues to satisfy our innate yearnings for transcendence and fulfillment. Paradoxically, our expansion in intelligence, deepening social connections, and broadening aesthetic horizons, while a testament to our freedom and creativity, have often posed challenges rather than liberating us from constraints. In a world more interconnected and communicative than ever before, courtesy of advances in communication and transportation, and despite our exposure to universal aspirations for freedom, security, and prosperity, our society remains marred by mutual suspicions and fears, suffering from political polarization, ideological extremism, and religious fundamentalism. Even amidst well-established laws, policies, regulations, and moral norms, we find ourselves not entirely secure. A prevailing sense persists that our community has lost the sacred canopy or symbolic framework that once furnished us with a profound sense of self, connection, and belonging.

Korea, much like many other nations, grapples with distrust, division, and disharmony. Despite religion's substantial contributions to the nation's formation, survival, and prosperity—from its role in nation-building and independence movements to its contributions to democratization—it continues to wrestle with mutual suspicion, animosity, and hatred. For instance, the Korean public increasingly fails to recognize religion's significant societal value; a recent survey revealed that half of the population now identifies as non-religious, downplaying its positive role. Two major faith communities, notably Protestant Christians and Buddhists, have occasionally found themselves embroiled in conflicts over influence, with each side accusing the other of receiving preferential treatment in policies and often blaming one another for perceived indifference to societal needs. Additionally, there is considerable public tension stemming from a lack of knowledge and understanding of religions at all levels, spanning from world religions and mainstream religious beliefs to new religious movements (NRMs) and folk religion/shamanism. In particular, Islam, relatively new to the Korean public, faces prejudice and unwarranted toxic opinions, which, in turn, shape negative discourse related to accepting refugees and permitting the construction of mosques in towns. Often, invisible but palpable religious conflicts are concealed beneath the surface, masquerading as evangelism and competition.

Call for Papers: As an extension and update of the Special Issue published in 2020 (https://www.mdpi.com/journal/religions/special_issues/Korean_Religion), we extend a warm invitation to scholars to contribute their expertise, delving into concepts, theories, interpretations, and strategies aimed at deepening and broadening our understanding of religion and religious conflict, with a specific focus on the Korean context. Researchers are encouraged to explore these themes through various methodological approaches, encompassing disciplines such as history, anthropology, psychology, textual studies, theology, and sociology, among others.

Topics of Interest (not exhaustive):

Historical perspectives on religious conflict and peace in Korea;

Psychological and sociological analysis of religious tensions;

Interactions between major religions in Korea;

Religious freedom and legal frameworks;

Role of religion in nation-building, democratization, and peaceful co-existence;

Intercultural and interfaith dialogue in Korea;

Education and religious literacy;

Media portrayal of religion and its impact;

Strategies for promoting religious coexistence;

Comparative studies on religious conflict in Korea;

Contribution of religion in multicultural education;

Role of religion in transnational phenomena in Korea.

We look forward to receiving your contributions and fostering a deeper understanding of religious conflict and coexistence in the Korean context. Together, we can contribute to building a more harmonious and inclusive society.

Dr. Song-Chong Lee
Prof. Dr. Yohan Yoo
Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a double-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Religions is an international peer-reviewed open access monthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 1800 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • Korean religion
  • religious conflict
  • interreligious dialogue

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

  • Ease of navigation: Grouping papers by topic helps scholars navigate broad scope journals more efficiently.
  • Greater discoverability: Special Issues support the reach and impact of scientific research. Articles in Special Issues are more discoverable and cited more frequently.
  • Expansion of research network: Special Issues facilitate connections among authors, fostering scientific collaborations.
  • External promotion: Articles in Special Issues are often promoted through the journal's social media, increasing their visibility.
  • e-Book format: Special Issues with more than 10 articles can be published as dedicated e-books, ensuring wide and rapid dissemination.

Further information on MDPI's Special Issue policies can be found here.

Published Papers (7 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

18 pages, 309 KiB  
Article
Negotiating Wonhan: Cognitive Frameworks and Ritual Responses to Unresolved Grievances in Joseon Korea
by Yuri Kim
Religions 2025, 16(3), 317; https://doi.org/10.3390/rel16030317 - 3 Mar 2025
Viewed by 463
Abstract
This study examines how cognitive mechanisms shaped the understanding and ritualization of wonhan (寃恨, resentment) in Joseon Korea, particularly in the context of disasters. Drawing on cognitive science and historical analysis, it demonstrates that while wonhan functioned as a shared conceptual framework across [...] Read more.
This study examines how cognitive mechanisms shaped the understanding and ritualization of wonhan (寃恨, resentment) in Joseon Korea, particularly in the context of disasters. Drawing on cognitive science and historical analysis, it demonstrates that while wonhan functioned as a shared conceptual framework across social boundaries, debates over wonhon (寃魂, resentful spirits) exposed ideological tensions in state orthodoxy. Through an analysis of key historical cases, particularly the 1451 Sinmi Year Rituals, the study shows how the tension between intention-based and system-based reasoning was negotiated within ritual practices and political discourse. The research reveals that state rituals, especially yeoje, served as sites where these competing reasoning modes interacted. Even as state officials maintained system-based interpretations of resentment as disruptive energy, the inherently anthropomorphic nature of ritual prayer necessitated treating the deceased as intentional agents. This created a practical synthesis of divergent reasoning modes within ritual contexts. By examining the cognitive foundations of wonhan and wonhon, this study highlights the multilayered nature of contentious religious issues. It demonstrates how shared conceptual ground can emerge even within seemingly opposed perspectives and how conflicting reasoning modes can coexist in ritual contexts. The findings suggest that religious disputes are not solely doctrinal conflicts but also reflect deeper cognitive tendencies that shape divergent interpretations. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Religious Conflict and Coexistence in Korea)
11 pages, 288 KiB  
Article
Why Sink a Tiger Head into the Water? Conflict and Coexistence of Cultural Meanings in Joseon Rainmaking Rituals
by Hyung Chan Koo
Religions 2025, 16(3), 315; https://doi.org/10.3390/rel16030315 - 3 Mar 2025
Viewed by 387
Abstract
This paper elucidates the cognitive and cultural underpinnings that facilitate the coexistence of multiple—occasionally contradictory—interpretive frameworks of magico-religious beliefs and practices within a single sociocultural context. Religious beliefs and practices frequently transcend the boundaries established by a tradition’s official doctrines and normative frameworks. [...] Read more.
This paper elucidates the cognitive and cultural underpinnings that facilitate the coexistence of multiple—occasionally contradictory—interpretive frameworks of magico-religious beliefs and practices within a single sociocultural context. Religious beliefs and practices frequently transcend the boundaries established by a tradition’s official doctrines and normative frameworks. From the perspective of religious authorities and theological elites, such transgressions may constitute sites of tension and doctrinal concern. However, individuals, as the primary agents of lived religion, rarely conceptualize these situations as crises of faith or legitimacy. Instead, they develop improvisational strategies to negotiate these apparent contradictions within their sociocultural milieus. At the cultural level, religious beliefs and practices are not rigidly constrained by dominant official doctrines and normative prescriptions; rather, they accommodate a diverse range of interpretive possibilities. Focusing on a specific rainmaking ritual known as “Tiger Head Sinking” from the Joseon Dynasty—a period marked by the hegemony of Neo-Confucian doctrinal and normative structures—this study investigates how the dynamic interplay between cognitive constraints and cultural schemas facilitates the coexistence of seemingly incompatible interpretations and folk theories of the ritual. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Religious Conflict and Coexistence in Korea)
19 pages, 334 KiB  
Article
Bridging Doctrinal Divides: Analyzing Ecumenical Dialogue Between Catholics and Protestants in South Korea
by Eunsil Son
Religions 2025, 16(2), 221; https://doi.org/10.3390/rel16020221 - 12 Feb 2025
Viewed by 1131
Abstract
The remarkable growth of Catholicism and Protestantism in Korea has garnered significant attention in the history of Asian missions. However, their relationship has predominantly been characterized by persistent conflicts and competition, with limited progress in ecumenical efforts. This study examines the ecumenical dialogue [...] Read more.
The remarkable growth of Catholicism and Protestantism in Korea has garnered significant attention in the history of Asian missions. However, their relationship has predominantly been characterized by persistent conflicts and competition, with limited progress in ecumenical efforts. This study examines the ecumenical dialogue between Catholics and Protestants in Korea, focusing on the doctrinal issues central to their divisions. The analysis reveals that many of these disputes stem from doctrinal controversies introduced by Western missionaries in the early 20th century. Through a detailed examination of dialogue documents, the study demonstrates that despite over two decades of concentrated ecumenical efforts since 2000—when serious discussions on doctrinal matters began—progress remains limited. This stagnation is attributed to the lack of rigorous academic inquiry, insufficient engagement with global ecumenical movements, and ineffective dialogue methodologies. Finally, the article provides suggestions for fostering the local adoption of global ecumenical initiatives and promoting greater unity among Christians. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Religious Conflict and Coexistence in Korea)
13 pages, 241 KiB  
Article
The Conflicts and Compromises of the Two Cosmologies Making Korean Shamanism
by Dongkyu Kim
Religions 2025, 16(2), 199; https://doi.org/10.3390/rel16020199 - 7 Feb 2025
Viewed by 894
Abstract
This article explores how the unique cosmology of Korean shamanism, which continues to function as a living religion in contemporary Korea, has been shaped. A key characteristic of the cosmology in Korean shamanism is its combination of two cosmological beliefs. First, it adheres [...] Read more.
This article explores how the unique cosmology of Korean shamanism, which continues to function as a living religion in contemporary Korea, has been shaped. A key characteristic of the cosmology in Korean shamanism is its combination of two cosmological beliefs. First, it adheres to the general shamanistic cosmology of protection, where suffering caused by supernatural beings can be overcome through the protection of even more powerful beings, who also assist in predicting the future. Second, it incorporates the belief that human life and the universe operate according to specific cosmological principles. The coexistence of these two distinct cosmologies which form an explanatory system of modern Korean shamanism reflects the historical experiences of Koreans with Confucianism during the Joseon dynasty and with Western modernity. In this paper, I analyze the dynamics of conflict and compromise between the two cosmologies through a historical approach and case studies. Specifically, I examine the use of the terms ‘unse (wheel of fortune)’ and ‘spirit’s intervention’ as conceptual metaphors representing each cosmology, as they are employed in interactions between shamans and their clients. Furthermore, I maintain that contemporary Korean shamanism is a form of religious practice constructed as a compromise between various worldviews, including those of shamans and their clients. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Religious Conflict and Coexistence in Korea)
12 pages, 279 KiB  
Article
The History of the Myeongjin School (1906–1910): A Critical Examination of Korean Buddhism’s First Modern Educational Institution within the Pre-Colonial Context
by Cheonghwan Park and Kyungrae Kim
Religions 2024, 15(6), 716; https://doi.org/10.3390/rel15060716 - 10 Jun 2024
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1232
Abstract
During the operation of the Myeongjin School, it not only employed many leading Buddhist progressives, but graduated key Buddhist reformers. Overcoming conservative opposition within the Korean Buddhist community, during its brief operation the Myeongjin School would open dozens of branches at temples throughout [...] Read more.
During the operation of the Myeongjin School, it not only employed many leading Buddhist progressives, but graduated key Buddhist reformers. Overcoming conservative opposition within the Korean Buddhist community, during its brief operation the Myeongjin School would open dozens of branches at temples throughout Korea, prompting a proliferating modern education throughout its Buddhist community. Over the century, the institute founded as the Myeongjin School suffered repeated closures during Korea’s Japanese Annexation only to emerge from the Korean War as Dongguk University Seoul. As Korea’s oldest and largest Buddhist university, Dongguk has produced over 350,000 graduates and, despite transitioning to a more secular approach to education, it remains a leading center for monastic education, Buddhist studies, and intellectual culture. This article examines, in detail, the origins, founding, and operation of the Myeongjin School within the dynamic political and religious context of Korea’s early modern period, in addition to the school’s impact, subsequent history, and legacy. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Religious Conflict and Coexistence in Korea)
16 pages, 389 KiB  
Article
Ham Sok Hon: Bridging Spirituality and Politics
by Song-Chong Lee
Religions 2024, 15(5), 601; https://doi.org/10.3390/rel15050601 - 13 May 2024
Viewed by 1358
Abstract
This paper aims to offer an interpretation of Ham Sok Hon’s views on the dynamic relationship between religion and politics. While considerable discussion has already taken place in the Korean academic community across various fields, including philosophy, theology, and political science, many of [...] Read more.
This paper aims to offer an interpretation of Ham Sok Hon’s views on the dynamic relationship between religion and politics. While considerable discussion has already taken place in the Korean academic community across various fields, including philosophy, theology, and political science, many of which propose ssial philosophy as the metaphysical foundation of his political thoughts, there still remains a need for a more systematic understanding of their relationship, which I argue is closely linked to his concept of jeonilhwa gwajeong (the process of unification/integration). By exploring Ham’s unique analysis, particularly in relation to the notion of ipcheseong (stereoscopic/multi-dimensional), this paper will underscore their shared roots and objectives across different spheres of life: one pertaining to salim (human affairs) seeking the pursuit of fairness and equality, and the other dealing with spirituality, aspiring to grasp the sublime aspects of human existence. Both religion and politics, as these movements are termed, are mutually dependent, with their culmination promising peace and harmony in historical reality. Through highlighting Ham’s integrated perspective on religion and politics, I will ultimately suggest a specific discourse—civil religion—as a theoretical framework to effectively unravels Ham’s viewpoints. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Religious Conflict and Coexistence in Korea)
24 pages, 355 KiB  
Article
A Study of the Aekmagi Ritual in Jeju Shamanic Religion: Focusing on the Sacred Status of Shamans and the Significance of Sacrifice
by Yohan Yoo
Religions 2024, 15(1), 60; https://doi.org/10.3390/rel15010060 - 2 Jan 2024
Viewed by 2916
Abstract
In the Jeju shamanic religion, chickens have been sacrificed for aekmagi, a ritual to prevent aek, a looming misfortune that may cause death. Whereas ordinary participants are thought to be at risk of harm when possessing or eating chickens or other offerings [...] Read more.
In the Jeju shamanic religion, chickens have been sacrificed for aekmagi, a ritual to prevent aek, a looming misfortune that may cause death. Whereas ordinary participants are thought to be at risk of harm when possessing or eating chickens or other offerings made to prevent aek, the simbang, Jeju shamans, are thought to be immune to it. Simbang are believed to be permanently on the threshold between the human and the divine realms. They help remove aek but are not harmed by it, because it only harms humans in the human realm, not the person on the boundary. While the other participants are temporarily placed in the liminal state during aekmagi and come back to the ordinary living human realm after the ritual, simbang remain in the perpetual liminal state. Chicken sacrifice has been omitted from aekmagi since around 2010 in most places in Jeju-do. Though ritual killing is no longer practiced, adherents still think that aek is prevented by aekmagi. The Jeju people believe that gods are the main agents of preventing aek and that they can persuade the gods to do the work without receiving chickens’ lives. In addition, due to the change in people’s view on killing animals, aekmagi without chicken sacrifice has become a more efficient ritual system for nourishing social sustenance by following the new social prescription. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Religious Conflict and Coexistence in Korea)
Back to TopTop