Building Religious Solidarity in the Wake of the Increased Global Migration

A special issue of Religions (ISSN 2077-1444). This special issue belongs to the section "Religions and Health/Psychology/Social Sciences".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (15 December 2023) | Viewed by 15944

Special Issue Editors


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Sociology, University of Ljubljana, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia
Interests: sociology of religion
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

E-Mail Website
Co-Guest Editor
Department of Sociology, University of Ljubljana, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia
Interests: sociology of religion; pentecostalism & charismatic Christianity studies; embodied religion

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

The current and future social instability associated with the possible consequences of climate catastrophe and environmental disasters require an urgent reconsideration of our mechanisms of social solidarity. Data on global migration, including projected climate migration, i.e., migration caused by global climate change, delineate shifting demographic changes. Famine, drought, earthquakes, armed conflicts, as well as the decline in democratic standards of basic human rights, will inevitably lead to ever-increasing numbers of global migrants. This will inescapably cause social confrontations—including those on the basis of religious preferences—which could lead to the rise of radicalism, racism, Islamophobia, xenophobia, right-wing extremism, etc.

Sheer numerical scale aside, one of the main qualitative consequences of these demographic shifts is an increased plurality of local and global religious fields. This plurality underscores the need for academic (as well as public) discussion on how to enable and manage religious solidarity in these increasingly precarious conditions of religious pluralism.

Once renowned as a firm supporter of the secularisation thesis, sociologist Peter Berger later formulated a theory of religious pluralism. According to Berger, the latter—not religious decline—is the most important consequence of modernity vis-à-vis religions. Following Berger, we can broadly point out the double pluralism of contemporary societies: the coexistence of religions and the coexistence of religious and secular discourses and practices. We believe academic discussions of religious solidarity should take this double pluralism as a starting point. On the one hand, the goal is to flesh out specific religious conceptualizations of interreligious solidarity; on the other, it is vital to recognize the state as the fundamental guarantor of peaceful and creative religious coexistence. There are two main questions to be answered: firstly, how do specific religious actors—institutions—understand and practice religious solidarity?; and secondly, how does the state take on an active role in assuring interreligious solidarity while acting in accordance with basic stipulations of secularity and/or laicism?

Religions are not ahistorical social entities. For example, Christians migrating to the Global North are not simply “Christian”. The Christianity of the Global South, predominantly of the Charismatic variety, may in some aspects be fundamentally different from the Christianity of the Global North. Thus, the question is not simply about building interreligious solidarity, between Muslim and Christians for example, but intrareligious solidarity as well. How do religious actors reconcile basic doctrinal and practical differences within their own ranks? Furthermore, how does the state ensure that the public and the state itself are sufficiently informed on such differences? In other words, the social management of religious solidarity entails both intra- and interreligious solidarity, as well as well the solidarity between secular and religious actors.

These are just some of the challenges humanity faces in building present and future religious solidarity. Plentiful challenges call for plentiful discussions, which is why we welcome diverse and original scientific contributions to this Special Issue.

We request that, prior to submitting a manuscript, interested authors initially submit a proposed title and an abstract of 400–600 words summarizing their intended contribution. Please send it to the guest editors (anja.zalta@ff.uni-lj.si ) or to the Religions editorial office (religions@mdpi.com). Abstracts will be reviewed by the guest editors for the purposes of ensuring a proper fit within the scope of the Special Issue. Full manuscripts will undergo double-blind peer-review.

Dr. Anja Zalta
Mr. Igor Jurekovič
Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a double-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Religions is an international peer-reviewed open access monthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 1800 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • religious solidarity
  • secularism
  • laicism
  • post-secularism
  • religious plurality
  • state
  • religions
  • migration
  • climate change
  • Christian solidarity
  • Muslim solidarity
  • Buddhist solidarity
  • Hindu solidarity
  • Global North
  • Global South
  • new religious movement solidarity
  • interreligious and intrareligious solidarity

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

  • Ease of navigation: Grouping papers by topic helps scholars navigate broad scope journals more efficiently.
  • Greater discoverability: Special Issues support the reach and impact of scientific research. Articles in Special Issues are more discoverable and cited more frequently.
  • Expansion of research network: Special Issues facilitate connections among authors, fostering scientific collaborations.
  • External promotion: Articles in Special Issues are often promoted through the journal's social media, increasing their visibility.
  • Reprint: MDPI Books provides the opportunity to republish successful Special Issues in book format, both online and in print.

Further information on MDPI's Special Issue policies can be found here.

Published Papers (9 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Editorial

Jump to: Research

4 pages, 125 KiB  
Editorial
Editorial: Examining the Complicated Nature of Religious Solidarity
by Anja Zalta and Igor Jurekovič
Religions 2025, 16(1), 62; https://doi.org/10.3390/rel16010062 - 9 Jan 2025
Viewed by 588
Abstract
As we were sketching out aims for our Special Issue, we decided to focus on societal crisis and the role that religious communities (and religion more broadly) may play in bridging the conflicts of our age [...] Full article

Research

Jump to: Editorial

13 pages, 294 KiB  
Article
China–Thai Cultural Diplomacy Through the Buddhist Wat: A Case Study of the Thai Wat in Chaozhou Kaiyuan si, Guangdong
by Dongxiao Zheng and Yaoping Liu
Religions 2024, 15(11), 1365; https://doi.org/10.3390/rel15111365 - 11 Nov 2024
Viewed by 1904
Abstract
Cultural diplomacy is often regarded as a potent method to enhance the bond between nations by facilitating the interchange of cultural values and practices. Previous studies have focused chiefly on political and economic elements, neglecting the role of religious institutions in cultural diplomacy. [...] Read more.
Cultural diplomacy is often regarded as a potent method to enhance the bond between nations by facilitating the interchange of cultural values and practices. Previous studies have focused chiefly on political and economic elements, neglecting the role of religious institutions in cultural diplomacy. This paper investigates the function of Wat Chaozhou Kaiyuan si in Guangdong as a means of cultural diplomacy between China and Thailand. This temple is a significant platform for cultural and religious exchanges, fostering enhanced understanding and collaboration between the two nations. Using a case study methodology, this research employed five semi-structured interviews with several individuals, including a head monk from Wat, a monk from Thailand, a monk from China, a diplomat from Thailand, and a diplomat from China. Additionally, field observations were conducted. The data were examined using NVivo through a three-step process consisting of data collection, data coding, and data interpretation. The study produced four noteworthy findings: (1) Buddhism plays a vital role in cultural diplomacy by advancing national objectives through cultural engagement. (2) Cultural diplomacy involves the act of advancing a country’s interests by means of engaging in cultural exchanges. (3) We identified the key actors involved in formal cultural diplomacy. (4) Wat Chaozhou Kaiyuan acts as both a platform for cultural diplomacy and a facilitator of foreign cultural interactions, which is discussed in this study. Full article
20 pages, 819 KiB  
Article
Building Bridges: The Influence of the Islamic Religious Community on North Macedonia’s Interfaith and Socio-Political Dynamics
by Muhamed Ali, Mesut Idriz, AbdelRahman Ahmed AbdelRahman, Islam Islami and Kazi Fahmida Farzana
Religions 2024, 15(10), 1269; https://doi.org/10.3390/rel15101269 - 17 Oct 2024
Viewed by 1969
Abstract
This article critically examines the Islamic Religious Community (IRC) in North Macedonia, focusing on its significant role in influencing religious practices, socio-political dynamics, and interfaith relations within the country. Since its inception following the dissolution of Yugoslavia, the IRC has been central to [...] Read more.
This article critically examines the Islamic Religious Community (IRC) in North Macedonia, focusing on its significant role in influencing religious practices, socio-political dynamics, and interfaith relations within the country. Since its inception following the dissolution of Yugoslavia, the IRC has been central to redefining the public role of Islam, advocating for religious freedoms, and supporting the development of democratic values. Through a mixed-methods approach, this research traces the historical evolution of the IRC, analyzes its constitutional and legal framework, and assesses its impact on North Macedonia’s multi-ethnic and multi-religious society. While the IRC’s contributions to promoting interfaith understanding and national stability are highlighted, the study also critically engages with the institution’s shortcomings, particularly the controversies related to its leadership and the challenges posed by its political entanglements. These issues have, at times, compromised the IRC’s efforts in fostering social cohesion and interfaith harmony. The findings provide valuable insights into the complex role of religious institutions in enhancing social stability and democratic governance in diverse societies, positioning the IRC as a significant case study with implications for similar contexts globally. Full article
19 pages, 274 KiB  
Article
An Analysis of the Religious Solidarity Discourses Regarding the Syrian Refugees in Türkiye
by Melih Çoban
Religions 2024, 15(10), 1216; https://doi.org/10.3390/rel15101216 - 7 Oct 2024
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1431
Abstract
Following the outbreak of the civil war in Syria, a massive migration of Syrian nationals to Türkiye has been a significant phenomenon. This situation has become a problematic issue, as the massive presence of Syrian refugees in Türkiye has become an important part [...] Read more.
Following the outbreak of the civil war in Syria, a massive migration of Syrian nationals to Türkiye has been a significant phenomenon. This situation has become a problematic issue, as the massive presence of Syrian refugees in Türkiye has become an important part of the domestic political agenda. The politicization of the refugee issue has long since presented a duality of conflicting opinions among the Turkish society, whereas it has led to political debates between pro-government and opposition groups. In light of these developments, Turkish government elites have produced discourses of religious solidarity with the aim of providing tolerance and social acceptance for Syrian refugees and thus legitimizing the open door policy of the government toward these refugees. The aim of this study is to analyze and categorize the themes that constitute the basis of the discourses of religious solidarity regarding Syrian refugees in Türkiye. In this context, a second aim is to demonstrate how these themes have been welcomed in a positive manner by their adoption and recognition by Turkish society. To these aims, governmental discourses of religious solidarity and a sample consisting of 980 posts on the digital platform X have been analyzed by using the critical discourse analysis technique and have been categorized under two discursive themes, namely the ensar–muhacir analogy and the emphases on the Ottoman legacy. The conformity between these discourses and the government’s ideological orientation and the degree to which these discourses have been welcomed and adopted by the Turkish society have been discussed in detail. Full article
13 pages, 467 KiB  
Article
Religious Cooperation between Thailand and Sri Lanka in the 19th Century: A Study Based on Exchanged Pāli Letters
by Metteyya Beliatte and Yaoping Liu
Religions 2024, 15(7), 869; https://doi.org/10.3390/rel15070869 - 19 Jul 2024
Viewed by 1677
Abstract
When it comes to relations between Thailand (Siam) and Sri Lanka (Ceylon), the Buddhist connections between the two countries are often discussed and are highly valued. Communications between Thai and Sinhalese monks can be traced back to the 13th century: the Sukhothai era. [...] Read more.
When it comes to relations between Thailand (Siam) and Sri Lanka (Ceylon), the Buddhist connections between the two countries are often discussed and are highly valued. Communications between Thai and Sinhalese monks can be traced back to the 13th century: the Sukhothai era. These communications were then continuously maintained in the Ayutthaya era and have been up until the present day. Despite being situated far from each other and being separated by the sea, the people in these countries have been interacting through maritime routes and cooperating with each other regarding religious, cultural, financial, diplomatic, and political matters for centuries. The continuous interactions between the two came to a halt in the 18th century due to political instability in both countries. Only in the middle of the 19th century did Buddhists from the two countries resume their travels and interactions, rebuilding their bilateral relations and cooperation. There are very few studies that provide information regarding the religious cooperation between Siam and Ceylon in the 19th century. Religious cooperation between the two countries in the 19th Century has never been thoroughly studied and presented in detail. The purpose of the research paper is to investigate how Buddhists in these two countries cooperated with each other to achieve continuity and solidarity in Theravada Buddhism in both countries. We will address this question by analyzing the available data, which can mainly be found in the form of letters written in the Pāli language exchanged between Buddhists in the two countries. These letters have been published in Pālisandesāvalī in Sri Lanka and in Samaṇasāsana in Thailand. Full article
12 pages, 244 KiB  
Article
Black (and) Christian? New Systemic Racism and the ‘Refugee’ as a Depersonalised Category of Surplus: A Case Study of Tunisian Attitudes towards Sub-Saharan Africans
by Anja Zalta and Primož Krašovec
Religions 2024, 15(7), 863; https://doi.org/10.3390/rel15070863 - 17 Jul 2024
Viewed by 1135
Abstract
This article is based on a months-long investigation and aims to contribute to the scientific understanding of the process of racialisation of the sub-Saharan migrants in Tunisia. The starting point of our research was the speech given by the Tunisian president, Kais Saied, [...] Read more.
This article is based on a months-long investigation and aims to contribute to the scientific understanding of the process of racialisation of the sub-Saharan migrants in Tunisia. The starting point of our research was the speech given by the Tunisian president, Kais Saied, in February 2023. In the light of new negotiations with the EU for technical, administrative, and financial support in the management of migration in the Mediterranean, the president emphasised the importance of Tunisia being and remaining Arab and Muslim. The sub-Saharan migrants who have penetrated the Mediterranean area in large numbers, mostly via Libya or Algeria, are black. Many of them are also Christians. The Tunisian case regarding the racialisation of migrants is similar to the dynamics of political discourses and actions of systemic racialisation in European countries. Our thesis is that racialisation based on religion and/or skin colour is part of a more complex dynamic, defined by the capitalist mode of production, which, due to its inner contradictions, simultaneously requires and expels human labour force. We claim that the permanently expelled constitute surplus populations that are, due to not being disciplined by the capitalist markets, considered dangerous, which is why they fall under police jurisdiction. This process of policing surplus populations is what constitutes contemporary systemic racism as a special mode of state politics, whereby “race” is the result of said process and not determined by its biological, religious, ethnic, or cultural characteristics. We support our thesis by a fieldwork study consisting of qualitative interviews with Tunisian experts, conducted based on purposive sampling and subsequent qualitative coding, as well as of three personal narrative interviews, which were conducted with sub-Saharan migrants from Cameroon, who had been living in a refugee “village” in the north of Tunisia for more than a year. Full article
23 pages, 975 KiB  
Article
Islamophobia beyond Explicit Hate Speech: Analyzing the Coverage of Muslims in Slovenia’s Public Broadcasting
by Igor Jurekovič
Religions 2024, 15(6), 697; https://doi.org/10.3390/rel15060697 - 4 Jun 2024
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 1416
Abstract
Religion in Europe has been undergoing two fundamental changes in the past four decades. As a side effect of secularization, religious fields have been pluralizing. On the other hand, religions themselves have taken a qualitative shift towards lived, material characteristics. Focusing exclusively on [...] Read more.
Religion in Europe has been undergoing two fundamental changes in the past four decades. As a side effect of secularization, religious fields have been pluralizing. On the other hand, religions themselves have taken a qualitative shift towards lived, material characteristics. Focusing exclusively on the diversification of European religious fields, we are interested in the concept of religious literacy as a tool for competent engagement in contemporary religious plural societies. To better understand the role of public media in fostering religious literacy, we offer an analysis of the public broadcaster’s coverage of smaller religious communities in Slovenia. Focusing particularly on Muslims as the largest religious minority in Slovenia, we provide an analysis of 245 episodes, consisting of 540 items, in the 2015–2020 period. We show that the coverage given to smaller religious communities is unevenly spread amongst the communities, with disproportional airtime given to Christian churches and communities. Furthermore, we pinpoint the key qualitative difference in portrayals of Slovenian Muslims and non-Catholic Christians, explaining how the process of racialized Islamophobia may continue beyond explicit hate speech. In conclusion we set out limitations of our study and provide guidelines for future research. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

16 pages, 285 KiB  
Article
The Catholic Church and Refugees in Slovenia
by Srečo Dragoš
Religions 2024, 15(4), 387; https://doi.org/10.3390/rel15040387 - 22 Mar 2024
Viewed by 1699
Abstract
In Slovenia, the Roman Catholic Church (RCC) is the largest, most influential, richest, and most politically significant among all religious organisations. In estimating its contribution related to migration and the refugee situation it is necessary to consider the wider context of Slovenian society, [...] Read more.
In Slovenia, the Roman Catholic Church (RCC) is the largest, most influential, richest, and most politically significant among all religious organisations. In estimating its contribution related to migration and the refugee situation it is necessary to consider the wider context of Slovenian society, primarily four characteristics: (1) despite the principle of separation of state and religious spheres, it is in relation to the Roman Catholic Church that the bulk of unresolved issues and occasional exacerbations occur; (2) while Slovenian public opinion is rather volatile in its expression of social distance to foreigners, it does not represent the main problem; (3) Slovenia’s state politics are very closed to refugees; and (4) political parties from the right wing of the political spectrum are rather xenophobic. While the Catholic Caritas plays a positive role in the care of refugees, the RCC has always supported the right-wing political parties when they come to power, and it is also susceptible to Islamophobia. Full article
14 pages, 262 KiB  
Article
Faith in Humanity: Religious Charitable Organizations Solidarity towards Migrants in the United Arab Emirates
by Wafa Barhoumi Hamdi, Semiyu Adejare Aderibigbe, Mesut Idriz and Mouza Mohamed Alghfeli
Religions 2024, 15(3), 266; https://doi.org/10.3390/rel15030266 - 22 Feb 2024
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 2901
Abstract
The plight of migrants and the need to foster their integration into diverse societies are of concern to global communities, governments, and charitable organizations. This study explored the roles of philanthropic organizations in the United Arab Emirates (UAE) in demonstrating solidarity towards migrants, [...] Read more.
The plight of migrants and the need to foster their integration into diverse societies are of concern to global communities, governments, and charitable organizations. This study explored the roles of philanthropic organizations in the United Arab Emirates (UAE) in demonstrating solidarity towards migrants, exploring the multifaceted dimensions of compassion and support rooted in diverse religious principles. The study adopted a qualitative approach guided by the interpretivist paradigm when collecting and analyzing data. From its findings, the study highlights the integral role they play in addressing the complex needs of migrant communities. For instance, they provide food and financial support in clearing hospitals, tuition, and rent bills. In addition, the findings show that the organizations identify migrants in need through their open-door policy, encouraging those in need of support to contact them directly, with collaboration also being essential for the effectiveness of their services. By affirming the positive contributions of religious charities, this study underscores their role in promoting the well-being and social cohesion of migrants, ultimately exemplifying a shared commitment to humanitarian values and reinstating faith in the collective capacity for compassion and solidarity. Full article
Back to TopTop