Religions and Violence: Dialogue and Dialectic

A special issue of Religions (ISSN 2077-1444).

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (1 July 2024) | Viewed by 6896

Special Issue Editors


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Government, Legal Studies and Philosophy, Tarleton State University, Stephenville, TX 76402, USA
Interests: legal studies and philosophy

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Government, Legal Studies and Philosophy, Tarleton State University, Stephenville, TX 76402, USA
Interests: republicanism; Hobbes & Spinoza; American political thought; judicial review; constitutional populism; political philosophy; critical theory; political theology; Augustine & ideology; civic engagement
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

The theme of religion and violence continues to spark new research, as demonstrated by Juergensmeyer, Kitts, and Jerryson’s 2013 volume, Andrew Murphy’s Blackwell Companion to Religion and Violence (2011), and Jeffrey Kaplan’s Radical Religion and Violence (2015).  These studies received further impetus after January 6, 2021 in the United States and pronouncements by Patriarch Kirill on the Russian invasion of Ukraine. However, as Nancy Levene (2017) has shown, religion interfaces with modernity, democracy, critique, and interpretation.  A comprehensive consideration therefore requires the integration of additional themes. We include major world religions, accounting for identity and tradition; violence, socialization and community; consensus formation and stability; and civic engagement. We problematize the current literature: mining internal world religion resources to explore interpretations that produce stable identities, peace, overlapping consensus, and robust civic engagement.

Evidence of apparently religious radicalization is everywhere. Stephen Wolfe’s publication, The Case for Christian Nationalism (2022) is a fact, as are creationist curricula and the Reconstructionist symbolism of January 6.  Today, is it inconceivable that Catholic integralism could lead to resistance against the American state, or that Gary Steward’s Justifying Revolution (2021), which traces the influence of Calvinist resistance theories, could support physical opposition to the “Babylonian” regime that surrounds gender transitions with confidentiality from parents?     

Yet, The Myth of Religious Violence by William Cavanaugh (2009) has pushed back against this framing.  Karuna Mantena has explored how for Gandhi’s satyagraha, framed within realism, leads to peace (2012), and Ajay Skaria has further emphasized that satyagraha is “the religion that stays in all religions” (2016).  The exchange among Walter Burkert, Rene Girard, and Jonathan Z Smith (1987), with Smith opposing a general violence-based theory of religion, is critical, as is the research on the violence and religion of Remi Brague (Sur La Religion, including “Violence et religions” (2018)).

As Altemeyer and Hunsberger (1992) have also acknowledged, orthodoxy is not fundamentalism.  How can we understand communities that reject core liberal principles but embrace peace?  These religionists must be included in broader conversations of religion and violence. In a Jewish framework, Strauss, Spinoza and Sinai (2022), edited by Jeffrey Bloom, Alec Godstein, and Gil Student, explored insights into Orthodoxy from philosopher Leo Strauss.  In a Christian context, Rod Dreher’s The Benedict Option (2017) envisions the peaceful secession of the traditional-minded.

To further problematize religion and violence with respect to consensus formation and stability in an Islamic milieu: religion may aid democratization efforts.  As Andrew March relates in Islam and Liberal Citizenship (2009), Rawls is more consistent with Sunni beliefs than previously thought.  The Habermas–Ratzinger exchange (2006) provides additional reasons to hope that religious language can productively contribute to consensus formation in the public sphere.   

Interpretation is essential in this broader “religion and violence” discourse. Therefore, in asking how religions contribute to stable identities and traditions, peace, and community consensus, we will also investigate the internal resources of organized belief systems. Which hermeneutics help most in reading religious texts, and which are potentially supported by religions themselves: Do these studies adopt post-modern, Gademerian, or critical theoretical lenses?

We look forward to your contributions.

References

  1. Andrew, M. Islam and Liberal Citizenship. Oxford University Press: New York, NY, USA, 2009; ISBN 978-019-979-428-7.
  2. Altemeyer, B.; B. E. Hunsberger. Authoritarianism, Religious Fundamentalism, Quest, and Prejudice. The International Journal for the Psychology of Religion 1992, 2, 113-133, doi: 10.1111/j.1540-4560.1995.tb01326.x.
  3. Bloom, J., A. Goldstein, and G. Student (Eds.). Strauss, Spinoza & Sinai: Orthodox Judaism and Modern Questions of Faith. Kodesh Press: Teaneck, NJ, USA, 2022; ISBN 978-194-785-772-8.
  4. Brague, R. Sur la religion. Flammarion: Paris, France, 2018; ISBN 978-208-141-686-4.
  5. Burkert, W.; R. Girard; and J. Z. Smith. Violent Origins: Walter Burkert, René Girard, and Jonathan Z. Smith on Ritual Killing and Cultural Formation. Stanford University Press, Redwood City, CA, 1988; ISBN 978-080-471-518-8.
  6. Cavanaugh, W. T. The Myth of Religious Violence: Secular Ideology and the Roots of Modern Conflict. Oxford University Press: New York, NY, USA, 2009; ISBN 978-019-538-504-5.
  7. Dreher, R. The Benedict Option: A Strategy for Christians in a Post-Christian Nation. Penguin: New York, NY, USA, 2018; ISBN 978-073-521-330-2.
  8. Habermas, J.; Ratzinger, J. Dialectics of Secularization: On Reason and Religion. Ignatius Press: San Francisco, CA, USA, 2006; ISBN 978-158-617-166-7.
  9. Juergensmeyer, M.; Kitts, M.; Jerryson, M. The Oxford Handbook of Religion and Violence. Oxford University Press: New York, NY, USA, 2013; ISBN 978-019-027-009-4.
  10. Kaplan, J. Radical Religion and Violence. Routlege: Abingdon, 2015; ISBN 978-081-534-831-3.
  11. Levene, N. Powers of Distinction: On Religion and Modernity. University of Chicago Press: Chicago, IL, USA, 2017; ISBN 978-022-650-753-8.
  12. Mantena, K. Another realism: The politics of Gandhian nonviolence. American Political Science Review 2012, 106, 455-470, doi: 10.1017/s000305541200010x.
  13. Murphy, A. R. (Ed.). The Blackwell Companion to Religion and Violence. John Wiley & Sons, 2011; ISBN 978-140-519-131-9.
  14. Skaria, A. Unconditional Equality: Gandhi's Religion of Resistance. University of Minnesota Press: Minneapolis, MN, USA, 2016; ISBN 978-081-669-866-0.
  15. Steward, G. L. Justifying Revolution: The American Clergy's Argument for Political Resistance, 1750-1776. Oxford University Press: New York, NY, USA, 2021; ISBN 978-019-756-535-3.
  16. Wolfe, S. The Case for Christian Nationalism. Canon Press: Moscow, ID, USA, 2022; ISBN 978-195-790-533-4.

Dr. Eric Morrow
Dr. Bolek Kabala
Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a double-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Religions is an international peer-reviewed open access monthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 1800 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

  • Ease of navigation: Grouping papers by topic helps scholars navigate broad scope journals more efficiently.
  • Greater discoverability: Special Issues support the reach and impact of scientific research. Articles in Special Issues are more discoverable and cited more frequently.
  • Expansion of research network: Special Issues facilitate connections among authors, fostering scientific collaborations.
  • External promotion: Articles in Special Issues are often promoted through the journal's social media, increasing their visibility.
  • e-Book format: Special Issues with more than 10 articles can be published as dedicated e-books, ensuring wide and rapid dissemination.

Further information on MDPI's Special Issue polices can be found here.

Published Papers (6 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

Jump to: Other

24 pages, 305 KiB  
Article
Doing Violence to Darwin: Conflicting Christian Evaluations of Darwinism and Violence
by Malcolm L. Cross
Religions 2024, 15(10), 1221; https://doi.org/10.3390/rel15101221 - 8 Oct 2024
Viewed by 1148
Abstract
At issue is the degree to which Charles Darwin’s theory of evolution by means of natural selection is to blame for violence caused by communism, Nazism, and other societal dysfunctions. Conservative Christian opponents claim Darwinism undermines Biblical authority and supports ideologies causing violence. [...] Read more.
At issue is the degree to which Charles Darwin’s theory of evolution by means of natural selection is to blame for violence caused by communism, Nazism, and other societal dysfunctions. Conservative Christian opponents claim Darwinism undermines Biblical authority and supports ideologies causing violence. Secular and Christian supporters of Darwinism argue that Darwinism has not promoted violence but has been used to provide a scientific rationale for violence that would have been caused anyway. Moreover, Christian supporters of Darwinism maintain that Darwinism is by no means incompatible with the Bible. This paper examines claims by both sides as well as the attempts by Darwinism’s Christian opponents to supplant Darwinism with theories which they hope will restore Biblical authority, including Creationism, Creation Science, and Intelligent Design theory. The paper concludes that despite the legal setbacks encountered by adherents to these alternative theories, the conflict continues. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Religions and Violence: Dialogue and Dialectic)
8 pages, 188 KiB  
Article
The Irony of Technological Warfare: Reinhold Niebuhr’s Critique of Just War, Secular Rationalism, and Technological Progressivism in Military Weapons
by Luke M. Perez
Religions 2024, 15(9), 1080; https://doi.org/10.3390/rel15091080 - 5 Sep 2024
Viewed by 850
Abstract
Reinhold Niebuhr stands alone among many 20th century theorists of religion and politics for at once rejecting both the natural law tradition of just war, as well as the secular-rationalist tradition of his progressive contemporaries. Nowhere is his dual criticism more evident than [...] Read more.
Reinhold Niebuhr stands alone among many 20th century theorists of religion and politics for at once rejecting both the natural law tradition of just war, as well as the secular-rationalist tradition of his progressive contemporaries. Nowhere is his dual criticism more evident than in his critical stance on technology in war. For Niebuhr, technological advancements were not only inevitable, but sometimes necessary to develop in the face of advances from nefarious actors in world affairs. But using technologically advanced weapons risked destroying the moral authority of a nation by engaging in utilitarian calculus. Religious and military ethicists concerned with the integration of technological advancement in contemporary war would do well to consider Niebuhr’s thought and how it might be developed further in order to address the new concerns raised not only by modern tools such as drones, hypersonic weapons, and AI, but also by whatever yet to be developed technologies remain past the temporal horizons. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Religions and Violence: Dialogue and Dialectic)
12 pages, 257 KiB  
Article
Freedom by Coercion: Augustine’s Limitation of Coercion by the State
by Aaron P. Debusschere
Religions 2024, 15(9), 1049; https://doi.org/10.3390/rel15091049 - 29 Aug 2024
Viewed by 719
Abstract
Despite the tendency of some modern scholars to mark Augustine as the father of religious coercion, the Second Vatican Council (1962–65) cites him as a principal source for freedom of conscience. This essay presents evidence from Augustine’s letters and anti-Donatist writings to show [...] Read more.
Despite the tendency of some modern scholars to mark Augustine as the father of religious coercion, the Second Vatican Council (1962–65) cites him as a principal source for freedom of conscience. This essay presents evidence from Augustine’s letters and anti-Donatist writings to show that he both upheld freedom of conscience and maintained a vital role for state force. The essay shows that far from simply providing a Christian justification for the use of state force against non-Catholics, Augustine most notably imposed the limits of Christian charity on a long history of state-sponsored religious persecution. Only by the charitable and paternal application of discipline by the state would many Donatists be truly free to follow their conscience. In this way, those persecuted for being in schism could attain freedom by coercion. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Religions and Violence: Dialogue and Dialectic)
7 pages, 259 KiB  
Article
Aristotle Meets Augustine in Fourteenth-Century Liège: Religious Violence in the Chronicon of Jean Hocsem
by Chase Padusniak
Religions 2024, 15(8), 892; https://doi.org/10.3390/rel15080892 - 24 Jul 2024
Viewed by 827
Abstract
As William Cavanaugh has remarked, the scholarly notion of religion “should often be surrounded by scare quotes. Its flexibility and occasional nebulousness make evaluating its role in conceiving of, effecting, and justifying violence even more difficult. At the same time, it sticks around [...] Read more.
As William Cavanaugh has remarked, the scholarly notion of religion “should often be surrounded by scare quotes. Its flexibility and occasional nebulousness make evaluating its role in conceiving of, effecting, and justifying violence even more difficult. At the same time, it sticks around and remains a vital category of contemporary analysis. What if getting behind the Wars of Religion—the period to which Cavanaugh traces the emergence of his “myth of religious violence”—could plant the seeds for a new paradigm in understanding the relationship between religion and violence? In this article, I analyze the Chronicon of Jean Hocsem, a fourteenth-century canon from Liège. Untranslated into English and rarely written about, Hocsem’s text offers an unexpectedly political perspective on this question. Combining insights from Augustine’s City of God as well as Aristotle’s Politics and basing his ideas on his own experience of nearly constant conflict, Hocsem develops the idea that class antagonisms and human frailty make violence—especially political violence—inevitable. He takes this approach within a polity ruled by a prince-bishop, though one he would not have thought of as “religious”. Hocsem’s solutions are thus avowedly political. His pessimism about such questions leads to an emphasis on mitigating violence through the institution of proper socio-political structures. This reading of Hocsem and his politicizing of the question of violence opens new possibilities for scholars, further calling into question any easy relationship between the modern categories of “religion” and violence. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Religions and Violence: Dialogue and Dialectic)
12 pages, 238 KiB  
Article
The State, Religion, and Violence in Colonial and Postcolonial Malawi
by Paul Chiudza Banda
Religions 2024, 15(7), 853; https://doi.org/10.3390/rel15070853 - 16 Jul 2024
Viewed by 1357
Abstract
In the histories of both colonial and postcolonial Malawi, there have been cases of religious-related violence, both in its physical and non-physical forms. Such cases have led to the deaths of the “perpetrators” of violence and ‘innocent’ believers, destruction of property, prison detentions, [...] Read more.
In the histories of both colonial and postcolonial Malawi, there have been cases of religious-related violence, both in its physical and non-physical forms. Such cases have led to the deaths of the “perpetrators” of violence and ‘innocent’ believers, destruction of property, prison detentions, and even the forced removal of citizens from the country. This paper analyzes two case studies, one in which private citizens perpetrated the violence, led by a preacher called John Chilembwe, of the Providence Industrial Mission (PIM), challenging British colonial authorities during the second decade of the twentieth century. In the second case, the focus is on the independent Malawi government, which used violence against members of the Jehovah’s Witness (JW) religious sect from the early 1960s to the early 1990s, owing to the Witnesses’ disassociation from the demands of the secular state. Using data primarily drawn from various archives and other published studies, this paper argues that the use of ‘religious-based violence’ is not just a domain ‘reserved’ for those experiencing oppression, exclusion, and marginalization. Rather, authoritarian governments, like the one that emerged in postcolonial Malawi and other parts of Africa, also resorted to using ‘religious-based violence’ to serve as a tool for eliminating ‘non-conforming’ religious sects and organizations. In doing so, this paper contributes to the various fields of scholarship, including the relationship between religion and violence in modern Africa and the dynamics and operations of the state in both colonial and postcolonial Africa. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Religions and Violence: Dialogue and Dialectic)

Other

Jump to: Research

9 pages, 367 KiB  
Essay
Religion and Violence: Help from the Egyptian Desert
by Stuart E. Parsons
Religions 2024, 15(6), 723; https://doi.org/10.3390/rel15060723 - 13 Jun 2024
Viewed by 579
Abstract
Support for political violence by fundamentalist religious movements is both wide-spread and problematic, and now especially in Christian fundamentalist circles. To address this, this essay describes important components of the sophisticated ascetic and contemplative theory of spirituality of the fourth-century desert Christian spiritual [...] Read more.
Support for political violence by fundamentalist religious movements is both wide-spread and problematic, and now especially in Christian fundamentalist circles. To address this, this essay describes important components of the sophisticated ascetic and contemplative theory of spirituality of the fourth-century desert Christian spiritual master Evagrius of Pontus. Then, based on his theory, this essay offers guidance to modern-day Christian and non-Christian clergy who want to avoid alienating their congregations through partisan political stances, but who nevertheless seek to reduce those mental, emotional, and relational pathologies in their congregations which predispose passive and active support for political violence. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Religions and Violence: Dialogue and Dialectic)
Back to TopTop