Molecular Plant Virology: Mechanisms of Replication, Genome Packaging, and Pathogenesis in Positive-Strand RNA Viruses

A special issue of Plants (ISSN 2223-7747). This special issue belongs to the section "Plant Molecular Biology".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (30 September 2021) | Viewed by 3232

Special Issue Editor


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
University of California, Riverside | UCR · Department of Microbiology and Plant Pathology, Los Angeles, USA
Interests: molecular plant virology; RNA viruses; replication; genome packaging; recombination.

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

At the end of the 19th century, infectious agents smaller than bacteria, referred to as viruses, were discovered by a Russian botanist, Dmitri Ivanovsky. Since then, a wide range of viruses pathogenic to the food we eat, the air we breathe, and the community we live in have been identified. Ever since the discovery of the first virus, the iconic Tobacco mosaic virus, RNA plant viruses have occupied a unique niche in the virology community.

Almost all plant viruses are transmitted to their susceptible hosts by different vector species in infectious virion forms. The formation of infectious virions containing the genome involves two sequential, but complex, steps: replication and assembly of infectious virions. Replication is catalyzed by an active replicase complex consisting of virus-encoded replicase proteins and several host proteins.

Following replication, the next step is to encapsulate the infectious genome into virions by the capsid protein. Packaging into virions is envisioned as a specific process since assembled virions exclusively contain only the viral progeny. Over the last two decades, the recombinant DNA technology and molecular and cell biology-related techniques have been applied to study plant viruses. The available evidence offers novel insights into the plant viral genome’s organization, replication, and virion assembly. Moreover, biophysical and cryo-electron microscopy studies have provided information on the architecture and assembly of viral nucleocapsids. Other coordinated events such as local and long-distance movement and RNA silencing have been linked to the overall development of pathogenesis.

In this Special Issue of Plants, we focus on the latest advances in plant virus replication, genome packaging, and pathogenesis. Topics of interest include, but are not limited to, genome replication and packaging mechanisms, cell-to-cell and long-distance spread, RNA silencing, protein–protein interactions, and symptom development.

Prof. A.L.N. Rao
Guest Editor

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Plants is an international peer-reviewed open access semimonthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2700 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • molecular plant virology
  • replication
  • packaging and virus assembly
  • cell-to-cell and long-distance movement
  • protein–protein interactions
  • host proteins
  • symptom development

Published Papers (1 paper)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

10 pages, 1555 KiB  
Article
A Core35S Promoter of Cauliflower Mosaic Virus Drives More Efficient Replication of Turnip Crinkle Virus
by Md Emran Ali and Sumyya Waliullah
Plants 2021, 10(8), 1700; https://doi.org/10.3390/plants10081700 - 18 Aug 2021
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 2428
Abstract
The 35S promoter with a duplicated enhancer (frequently referred to as 2X35S) is a strong dicotyledonous plant-specific promoter commonly used in generating transgenic plants to enable high-level expression of genes of interest. It is also used to drive the initiation of RNA virus [...] Read more.
The 35S promoter with a duplicated enhancer (frequently referred to as 2X35S) is a strong dicotyledonous plant-specific promoter commonly used in generating transgenic plants to enable high-level expression of genes of interest. It is also used to drive the initiation of RNA virus replication from viral cDNA, with the consensus understanding that high levels of viral RNA production powered by 2X35S permit a more efficient initiation of virus replication. Here, we showed that the exact opposite is true. We found that, compared to the Core35S promoter, the 2X35S promoter-driven initiation of turnip crinkle virus (TCV) infection was delayed by at least 24 h. We first compared three versions of 35S promoter, namely 2X35S, 1X35S, and Core35S, for their ability to power the expression of a non-replicating green fluorescent protein (GFP) gene, and confirmed that 2X35S and Core35S correlated with the highest and lowest GFP expression, respectively. However, when inserted upstream of TCV cDNA, 2X35S-driven replication was not detected until 72 h post-inoculation (72 hpi) in inoculated leaves. By contrast, Core35S-driven replication was detected earlier at 48 hpi. A similar delay was also observed in systemically infected leaves (six versus four days post-inoculation). Combining our results, we hypothesized that the stronger 2X35S promoter might enable a higher accumulation of a TCV protein that became a repressor of TCV replication at higher cellular concentration. Extending from these results, we propose that the Core35S (or mini35S) promoter is likely a better choice for generating infectious cDNA clones of TCV. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop