Journal Menu
► ▼ Journal Menu-
- Materials Home
- Aims & Scope
- Editorial Board
- Reviewer Board
- Topical Advisory Panel
- Early Career Editorial Board
- Instructions for Authors
- Special Issues
- Topics
- Sections & Collections
- Article Processing Charge
- Indexing & Archiving
- Editor’s Choice Articles
- Most Cited & Viewed
- Journal Statistics
- Journal History
- Journal Awards
- Society Collaborations
- Conferences
- Editorial Office
Journal Browser
► ▼ Journal BrowserNeed Help?
Announcements
27 March 2026
Materials Exceptional Reviewers List 2026
We are thrilled to share the updated Exceptional Reviewers List 2026. This program was established to recognize and honor scholars who have consistently delivered exceptional review reports to our journal. Committed to fostering rigorous research and promoting knowledge exchange, Materials (ISSN: 1996-1944) acknowledges the vital role our reviewers play in maintaining the quality and integrity of the articles we publish. According to surveys conducted in 2025, 93% of our authors rated the peer review process as good or excellent, reflecting the strength and effectiveness of our reviewer community.
We would like to express our sincere appreciation to all the reviewers who have generously volunteered their time and expertise to assist in Materials’ peer-review process. Their dedication and attention to detail in evaluating manuscripts, offering valuable feedback, and contributing to academic rigor are truly commendable.
The Exceptional Reviewers List was introduced in March 2026. Every 2 months, we will select a group of outstanding reviewers and introduce them here.
March and April
|
Name: Dr. Giacomo Aiello |
Name: Dr. Maciej Kaźmierowski |
|
Name: Dr. André Luiz Missio |
Name: Dr. Dana Luca Motoc |
|
Name: Dr. Marija Pergal |
Name: Dr. Zaher Alkurdi |
|
Name: Dr. Gul Badin |
Name: Dr. Aires Camões |
|
Name: Dr. Dragan Ranković |
Name: Dr. Hesham Mohamed Elsayed Mohamed Khalifa |
|
Name: Prof. Dr. Marcos Antonio Japiassu Resende Montes |
Name: Dr. Keivan Kaboutari |
|
Name: Dr. Pawel Szymanski |
Name: Dr. Ammar Alsoud |
|
Name: Dr. Hugo M.R.D. Silva |
Name: Dr. Jaime Gonzalez Cuadra |
|
Name: Dr. Andrey Karmanov |
Name: Dr. Monika Sarvašová Kvietková |
|
Name: Dr. Rujito Sesariojiwandono Ridho Suharbiansah |
Name: Dr. Vanaraj Ramkumar |
|
Name: Dr. Brayan Javier Anaya Meza |
Name: Dr. Paolo Trucillo |
|
Name: Prof. Dr. Norbert M. Nemes |
Name: Dr. Denis Valuev |
|
Name: Prof. Dr. Eduard Laurenţiu Niţu |
Name: Dr. Milan Kragović |
|
Name: Dr. Rubén Cantón Vitoria |
Name: Dr. Ioan Tamașag |
|
Name: Dr. Juan Rubio Alonso |
Name: Dr. Edén Amaral Rodríguez Castellanos |
|
Name: Dr. Karol Chilmon |
Name: Dr. Cristian Abad Coronel |
|
Name: Dr. Maria Myrto Dardavila |
Name: Dr. Zhao Ding |
|
Name: Dr. Olha Dushna |
Name: Dr. Stefan Dzionk |
|
Name: Prof. Dr. Ulrica Edlund |
Name: Dr. Wiesław Frącz |
|
Name: Dr. Irena Fryc |
Name: Dr. Ivan Giorgio |
|
Name: Dr. Karolina Głogowska |
Name: Dr. Celine Hin |
|
Name: Dr. Liang Hong |
Name: Dr. Sotomi Ishihara |
|
Name: Dr. Fabian Kallmeier |
Name: Dr. Arno De Klerk |
|
Name: Dr. Samuel Koomson |
Name: Dr. Ana D. Kramar |
|
Name: Dr. Michal Krbat’a |
Name: Dr. Predrag Kuzmanović |
|
Name: Dr. Vladimir Kuzovkov |
Name: Prof. Dr. Najoua Labjar |
|
Name: Dr. Anil Lama |
Name: Dr. Irina Victorovna Lijanova |
|
Name: Dr. Haitao Ma |
Name: Dr. Robert Saraiva Matos |
|
Name: Dr. Jorge M. Meichtry |
Name: Dr. Jarosław Michałek |
|
Name: Dr. Anand Mohan |
Name: Dr. Ján Moravec |
|
Name: Dr. Alina Crina Muresan |
Name: Dr. Wei Sung Ng |
|
Name: Dr. Anne-Françoise Obaton |
Name: Prof. Dr. Serafim M. Oliveira |
|
Name: Dr. Alireza Ostadrahimi |
Name: Dr. Gaetano Palumbo |
|
Name: Dr. Ivana Panžić |
Name: Dr. Gheorghe Pascut |
|
Name: Prof. Dr. Herbert Pfnür |
Name: Dr. Oscar Piamba |
|
Name: Prof. Dr. Dirk Poelman |
Name: Dr. Anastasia D. Pournara |
|
Name: Dr. Shuo Qiao |
Name: Dr. Fei Rao |
|
Name: Dr. Nima Rezazadeh |
Name: Dr. Ergo Rikmann |
|
Name: Dr. Dariusz Sala |
Name: Dr. Clara Delgado-Sánchez |
|
Name: Dr. M G Bravo Sanchez |
Name: Dr. Laurentiu Slatineanu |
|
Name: Prof. Dr. Mark Edmund Smith |
Name: Dr. Alina Stefanache |
|
Name: Dr. Edin Suljovrujic |
Name: Dr. Ravi Teja Addanki Tirumala |
|
Name: Dr. Thuat Trinh |
Name: Prof. Dr. Boriana R Tzaneva |
|
Name: Dr. Stefan Wagner |
Name: Prof. Dr. Xiao-Yong Wang |
|
Name: Dr. Yan Wang |
Name: Prof. Dr. Yuhou Wu |
|
Name: Dr. Shuang Yi |
Name: Dr. Krzysztof Zakowski |
|
Name: Dr. Guangzhu Zhang |
Name: Dr. Min Zhang |
See what our reviewers have to say about the review process of Materials:
|
“I have experience reviewing scientific papers in the fields of nuclear technology, nuclear materials, structural integrity, and engineering design methodologies. I consider peer review an essential part of the scientific process in ensuring that published work is technically sound, clearly presented, and consistent with the existing literature. |
|
“A good review should support authors in strengthening the logic, clarity, and scientific reliability of their work.”—Dr. Maciej Kaźmierowski |
|
“High-quality peer review is essential not only for maintaining scientific rigor, but also for helping authors improve their manuscripts and strengthen the impact of their research. As scientists and researchers, dedicating part of our time to providing careful and constructive reviews is an important contribution to the advancement of science worldwide.”—Dr. André Luiz Missio |
|
“I am sincerely grateful to have been nominated among the exceptional reviewers for Materials journal. This recognition is both an honor and a reminder of the responsibility associated with peer review. |
|
“I am very proud to be a reviewer for your journal, as you publish very high-quality papers in the fields of materials science and polymers, which are also the main areas of my research interest. I am very satisfied with our collaboration throughout the entire review process, and everything has been functioning very well and in a highly organized manner.”—Dr. Marija Pergal |
|
“I value peer review as an opportunity to support researchers and contribute to improving the quality and clarity of scientific publications.”—Dr. Zaher Alkurdi |
|
“It is a great honor for me to be included in the Materials 2026 Exceptional Reviewers List. I am extremely pleased to hear this, and I truly appreciate the Materials team for placing their trust in me and giving me the opportunity to contribute scientifically. I believe such recognitions encourage young researchers and scientists to do better in their fields.”—Dr. Gul Badin |
|
“It is a great honor to be part of the MDPI Exceptional Reviewers List of 2026. The reviewers' commitment to rigorous peer review ensures high-quality research and academic integrity. A rewarding experience with MDPI.”—Dr. Aires Camões |
|
“It is an honor to contribute to the peer-review process of Materials and support the dissemination of high-quality scientific research.”—Prof. Dr. Marcos Antonio Japiassu Resende Montes |
|
“Over a robust track record of 117 peer-reviewed records for 73 manuscripts for respected journals, I have specialized in evaluating cutting-edge advancements in antenna design, metasurfaces, mm-Wave MIMO systems, and wireless communications. I view peer review as a vital duty to maintain scientific rigor, helping authors refine complex electromagnetic and signal processing frameworks to push the boundaries of modern electronic engineering.”—Dr. Keivan Kaboutari |
|
“Peer review contributes to improving the quality, clarity, and scientific rigor of manuscripts while supporting the integrity of the publication process.”—Dr. Dragan Ranković |
|
“Peer review is a responsibility to strengthen scientific rigor, support authors constructively, and advance trustworthy materials research.”—Dr. Hesham Mohamed Elsayed Mohamed Khalifa |
|
“Peer review is an important responsibility and a valuable way to support the quality and integrity of scientific publishing.”—Dr. Pawel Szymanski |
|
“Peer review is an important responsibility that helps maintain research quality and supports scientific progress in materials science.”—Dr. Ammar Alsoud |
|
“Peer review is an important responsibility to support scientific quality, clarity, and fairness in the publication process.”—Dr. Hugo M.R.D. Silva |
|
“Regarding my review experience, I would say that it has always been highly positive and rewarding because I truly enjoy helping other researchers improve the quality and clarity of their manuscripts. In many cases, reviewers can identify possible improvements or alternative perspectives that authors themselves may not easily perceive while writing the article. I always try to provide constructive, respectful, and encouraging feedback, as I fully understand the significant effort, dedication, and time that researchers invest in producing high-quality scientific work and advancing knowledge in their fields.”—Dr. Jaime Gonzalez Cuadra |
|
“Reviewing articles for MDPI Publishing is an important part of research activity. Peer review not only improves the quality of articles but also enhances the researcher’s qualifications and his scientific horizons.”—Dr. Andrey Karmanov |
|
“Reviewing for Materials allows me to support high-quality research and stay at the forefront of wood science and tech. It’s a privilege to contribute to the integrity of scientific publishing.”—Dr. Monika Sarvašová Kvietková |
|
“Reviewing for Materials has been a rewarding experience, allowing me to contribute to maintaining high scientific standards while staying engaged with emerging research developments.”—Dr. Rujito Sesariojiwandono Ridho Suharbiansah |
|
“Reviewing for Materials has been a rewarding experience, allowing me to contribute to maintaining high-quality scientific research and academic integrity.”—Dr. Vanaraj Ramkumar |
|
“Reviewing for Materials has been a valuable opportunity to contribute to the quality and rigor of scientific publishing.”—Dr. Brayan Javier Anaya Meza |
|
“Reviewing for Materials has been an important opportunity for both scientific growth and personal development, improving my critical thinking and research evaluation skills.”—Dr. Paolo Trucillo |
|
“Reviewing for Materials has combined academic rigor with notably efficient editorial handling, making the process constructive and faster than at many journals.”—Prof. Dr. Norbert M. Nemes |
|
“Reviewing for MDPI has been a very positive experience. The editorial process is efficient, professional, and highly respectful of reviewers’ expertise and time.”—Dr. Denis Valuev |
|
“The goal of peer review is to help authors improve their work and contribute to scientific progress. I strive to fulfil this goal to the best of my ability. My experience collaborating with *Materials* has been positive, both as a reviewer and as an author, and it has helped me stay engaged with current scientific developments.”—Prof. Dr. Eduard Laurenţiu Niţu |
|
“The review process in Materials is transparent and efficient. Communication with MDPI staff is fast and professional, and the platform is easy to use. It is a pleasure to contribute as a reviewer.”—Dr. Milan Kragović |
|
“When I review the work of other scientists, I feel like an anonymous co-author, helping to improve the scientific quality while also having the opportunity to learn. I appreciate the Materials editorial team for this award.”—Dr. Rubén Cantón Vitoria |
|
“Peer review is a cornerstone of academic integrity. I am committed to providing thorough, constructive, and timely reviews to help authors improve their work and advance the field of materials science.”—Dr. Shuo Qiao |
January and February
|
Name: Dr. Amadeusz Laszcz |
Name: Dr. Alireza Ostadrahimi |
|
Name: Dr. Amirhossein Mohammadi |
Name: Dr. Arturo Sanchez-Perez |
|
Name: Dr. Cinzia Maspero |
Name: Dr. Awadesh Kumar Mallik |
|
Name: Dr. Claver Pinheiro |
Name: Dr. Brian Ikeda |
|
Name: Dr. Dariusz Sala |
Name: Dr. Horacio Martinez |
|
Name: Dr. Edgars Elsts |
Name: Dr. Javad Kondori |
|
Name: Dr. Faisal Rafique |
Name: Prof. Dr. Juan Vielma-Perez |
|
Name: Dr. Fernando Del Ama Gonzalo |
Name: Dr. Karol Chilmon |
|
Name: Dr. Irina Victorovna Lijanova |
Name: Dr. Kwabena Boakye |
|
Name: Dr. Isabel Lado Touriño |
Name: Dr. Lisley Madeira Coelho |
|
Name: Dr. Ján Kačur |
Name: Dr. Loganathan Veeramuthu |
|
Name: Dr. Joanna Korzekwa |
Name: Dr. Mattia Maltauro |
|
Name: Dr. Liviu Duta |
Name: Prof. Dr. Pietro Ausiello |
|
Name: Dr. Miljan Kovacevic |
Name: Dr. Roque Aguado |
|
Name: Dr. Ming Wu |
Name: Prof. Dr. Saša Milojević |
|
Name: Dr. Nadezhda Zhuk |
Name: Dr. Sasan Rezaee |
|
Name: Dr. Paweł Kossakowski |
Name: Dr. Seokgyu Ryu |
|
Name: Dr. Rinat R. Ismagilov |
Name: Dr. Simone Galano |
|
Name: Dr. Tadesse Billo Reta |
Name: Dr. Sina Zinatlou Ajabshir |
|
Name: Dr. Vahid Shafaie |
Name: Prof. Dr. Suzana Samaržija-Jovanović |
|
Name: Dr. Valentin Oleksik |
Name: Dr. Úlfar Arinbjarnar |
|
Name: Dr. Wojciech Andrzejuk |
Name: Dr. Vedran Mrzljak |
|
Name: Dr. Yutaka Ohsedo |
Name: Prof. Dr. Vinicius De Oliveira |
|
Name: Dr. Yuwen Mu |
Name: Dr. Wenhua Chen |
|
Name: Dr. Alessio Cascino |
Name: Dr. Yutaka Oya |
|
Name: Prof. Dr. Andrzej Wieczorek |
Name: Dr. Angel de Jesús Morales Ramirez |
|
Name: Dr. Bogdan Tutunaru |
Name: Dr. Basanta Bhujel |
|
Name: Prof. Dr. Carol Forance Barry |
Name: Dr. Błażej Scheibe |
|
Name: Prof. Dr. Eduardo Maximino Sánchez Cervantes |
Name: Dr. Costin Iulian Lupu |
|
Name: Prof. Dr. Evgeniy B. Yakimov |
Name: Dr. Everton Granemann Souza |
|
Name: Prof. Dr. G.S. Patrin |
Name: Prof. Dr. Gaetano Paolone |
|
Name: Dr. Ganapathi Bharathi |
Name: Dr. Ignacio Collado |
|
Name: Dr. Ivana Perna |
Name: Dr. Jonas Matijosius |
|
Name: Dr. Kapil Gangwar |
Name: Prof. Dr. Josep Ramon Lliso-Ferrando |
|
Name: Dr. László Kótai |
Name: Dr. Luis Guerra Rosa |
|
Name: Prof. Dr. Luís Felipe Espindola-Castro |
Name: Dr. Mohammad Ali Nasiri |
|
Name: Dr. Marco Felipe Salas Orozco |
Name: Dr. Mohsen Mesbah |
|
Name: Prof. Dr. Matheus Paes Lima |
Name: Dr. Nicola Curreli |
|
Name: Prof. Dr. Mendelssolm Kister De Pietre |
Name: Dr. Nicolás Ulloa Castillo |
|
Name: Prof. Dr. Min Liu |
Name: Dr. Olga Iakobson |
|
Name: Dr. Natali Shevchenko |
Name: Dr. Robert Saraiva Matos |
|
Name: Dr. Ramona Kuhn |
Name: Prof. Dr. Rodrigo Pessoa |
|
Name: Prof. Dr. Rodrigo Barros Esteves Lins |
Name: Dr. Siyuan Song |
|
Name: Dr. Sergey Ilyin |
Name: Dr. Sylwia Wencel |
|
Name: Dr. Srinivas Gandrothula |
Name: Prof. Dr. Tadeusz Hryniewicz |
|
Name: Prof. Dr. Svetlana Saikova |
Name: Dr. Vitalii Kryzhanovskyi |
|
Name: Dr. Tianwei Chu |
Name: Dr. Zu Hawn Sung |
|
Name: Dr. Zhou Li |
|
See what our reviewers have to say about the review process of Materials:
|
“Peer review is an essential part of advancing scientific research. I appreciate the opportunity to contribute to maintaining the quality and integrity of publications in Materials.”—Dr. Amirhossein Mohammadi |
|
“Reviewing for Materials-MDPI has been a rewarding experience. The focus on acoustic materials and composite structures is robust, with rigorous peer review ensuring high-quality publications in sound absorption.”—Dr. Faisal Rafique |
|
“Regarding my experience as a reviewer, I would like to say that I consider MDPI in general, and Materials in particular, to be very serious and reputable. The review processes are straightforward to carry out, and the tools provided for reviewers are easy to use and very intuitive. In addition, the response times for both reviewers and authors are quite fast, which is one of the reasons I enjoy working with MDPI.”—Dr. Isabel Lado Touriño |
|
“Rigorous peer review is essential for advancing high-quality science, and I am pleased to contribute to maintaining the standards of Materials.”—Dr. Liviu Duta |
|
“Rigorous peer review is fundamental to trustworthy science. I am honored to contribute to the evaluation process and to support the advancement of high-quality research in materials science.”—Dr. Miljan Kovacevic |
|
“My review experience covers construction and materials research in experimental, numerical, and AI-based studies for Elsevier (e.g., Constr Build Mater), Springer Nature (e.g., Sci Rep), and MDPI.”—Dr. Vahid Shafaie |
|
“Over 20 years reviewing for dental journals, specializing in periodontics and implantology, ensuring scientific quality and innovation in numerous manuscripts.”—Dr. Arturo Sanchez-Perez |
|
“Reviewing for Materials has been a rewarding experience. The editorial process is smooth, communication is prompt, and the journal's commitment to quality research is evident throughout.”—Dr. Awadesh Kumar Mallik |
|
“My experience as a reviewer has broadened my understanding of the editorial process, scientific rigor, and research trends, while also enriching my academic writing.”—Dr. Lisley Madeira Coelho |
|
“My experience collaborating with the Materials journal team has been positive, both from the perspective of a reviewer and as an author. During the review process and the preparation of manuscripts, I received very helpful support from your team. You are highly professional, efficient, and kind. The manuscripts submitted for review were also of appropriate quality. The suggestions provided to improve the quality of the papers were well considered.”—Prof. Dr. Saša Milojević |
|
“Based on my experience, Materials is a responsive and responsible journal that respects and upholds the rights of authors and reviewers.”—Dr. Sasan Rezaee |
|
“Reviewing for Materials is incredibly rewarding. As an electrochemist, it’s a privilege to help peers refine research that bridges fundamental surface science with real-world applications.”—Dr. Seokgyu Ryu |
|
“Serving as a reviewer for Materials, an MDPI journal, has been a steady and meaningful part of my academic routine. The process moves efficiently, usually with clear deadlines and a well-organized submission system, allowing me to provide detailed, constructive feedback on manuscripts covering diverse topics in materials science. I have appreciated the opportunity to engage with emerging research, help uphold publication standards, and contribute to the field's ongoing development in a structured way. It's a solid, practical experience that keeps me connected to current work without excessive fanfare.”—Dr. Simone Galano |
|
“I am pleased to serve as a reviewer for Materials (MDPI), where I contribute to the advancement of high-quality research. My reviewing experience spans more than 10 reputable journals, including 5 MDPI journals and 5 Elsevier journals. This experience has allowed me to share my expertise and actively support the scientific community through constructive and rigorous peer review. It is a rewarding process that keeps me engaged with cutting-edge developments in materials science.”—Dr. Sina Zinatlou Ajabshir |
|
“The peer-review process is the foundation of scientific reliability; I provide clear, constructive, and rigorous comments that help authors improve their work and advance materials science.”—Prof. Dr. Suzana Samaržija-Jovanović |
|
“It has been fascinating to witness innovative ideas in materials science firsthand and to engage with the exciting, cutting-edge research submitted to Materials.”—Dr. Angel de Jesús Morales Ramirez |
|
“Reviewing for Materials is a rewarding experience, with an efficient and well-organized process that makes it easy to provide constructive feedback.”—Dr. Ignacio Collado |
|
“Reviewing for Materials is a rewarding opportunity to contribute to scientific quality while staying closely connected to emerging research in the field.”—Prof. Dr. Josep Ramon Lliso-Ferrando |
|
“Writing a review report is a solitary act, but also an act of professional collaboration. Peer review is an essential step for the advancement of humanity, providing consistency and equal opportunities for researchers worldwide.”—Dr. Luis Guerra Rosa |
|
“For me, being a reviewer means being at the forefront of modern science, while contributing and sharing my knowledge with recognized researchers.”—Dr. Olga Iakobson |
|
“Reviewing for Materials has been a valuable experience, allowing me to contribute to the quality and advancement of research in the field.”—Prof. Dr. Rodrigo Pessoa |
|
“I can review manuscripts in materials engineering, additive manufacturing, and metal forming processes.”—Dr. Sylwia Wencel |
|
“Reviewing for MDPI since 2023 has been a rewarding journey—ensuring scientific rigor while contributing to the advancement of quality research.”—Dr. Vitalii Kryzhanovskyi |