LLM-Inspired New Generation Machine Learning: Hyperparameter Optimization and Uncertainty Quantification

A special issue of Machine Learning and Knowledge Extraction (ISSN 2504-4990). This special issue belongs to the section "Learning".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: 31 December 2026 | Viewed by 1387

Editors


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Computer Science, University of Bedfordshire, Luton LU1 3JU, UK
Interests: Bayesian optimisation and model averaging with applications to Trauma outcome prediction; finance risks; fraud detection; drug design; stock forecasting
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Computer Science, University of Bedfordshire, Luton LU1 3JU, UK
Interests: deep learning and Bayesian inference with applications to protein design; Trauma survival; anomaly detection; radiology
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Advanced Computational Methods, Faculty of Science and Technology, Jan Dlugosz University in Czestochowa, Armii Krajowej 13/15, 42-200 Czestochowa, Poland
Interests: modelling; artificial intelligence; machine learning; artificial neural networks; deep learning; fuzzy logic; genetic algorithms; gene expression programming; adsorption cooling and desalination systems; adsorption chillers; fluidization; circulating fluidized bed (CFB) technology; oxy-fuel combustion; chemical looping combustion (CLC); calcium looping (CaL); combustion; co-combustion; biomass; heat transfer; NOx; SOx
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

Large Language Models (LLMs) have redefined scalability, context-awareness, and generalization in AI. Beyond text, their architectural innovations—massive parameterization, in-context learning, and implicit ensemble behavior—offer transformative insights for core machine learning challenges, particularly hyperparameter optimization (HPO) and uncertainty quantification (UQ). Traditional ML struggles with brittle HPO and poorly calibrated uncertainties, especially under data imbalance, distribution shift, or high-stakes deployment. This Special Issue seeks to bridge LLM-inspired paradigms with rigorous UQ and adaptive HPO to overcome these limitations.

We invite contributions that re-imagine Bayesian frameworks through an LLM lens. Key directions include:

  • LLM-driven HPO: meta-learning of search spaces, transformer-based surrogate models, or prompt-guided Bayesian optimization;
  • Well-calibrated UQ: Bayesian Model Averaging via ensemble-of-thoughts, Bayesian neural networks with attention-weighted priors, or test-time entropy regularization inspired by chain-of-thought sampling;
  • Real-world robustness: UQ under class imbalance (e.g., rare disease detection), survival analysis with censored data, or financial time-series with non-stationarity.

Applications of interest span medicine (clinician confidence scoring, personalized survival curves), finance (liquidity risk forecasting, volatility UQ), drug design (protein synthesis), and business (dynamic pricing under demand uncertainty, supply-chain disruption modeling). Methods addressing out-of-distribution detection, adversarial robustness, or scalable inference are particularly encouraged.

Submissions may include original research, reproducible benchmarks, or perspective pieces linking LLM mechanisms (e.g., emergent ensembling, scaling laws) to UQ theory. All papers must provide empirical validation on public or proprietary datasets, with code release strongly recommended per MAKE reproducibility standards.

This Special Issue will catalyze a “new generation” of trustworthy ML, where LLM-inspired adaptability meets Bayesian rigor to deliver actionable, calibrated predictions in critical domains.

Dr. Vitaly Schetinin
Dr. Livija I. Jakaite
Prof. Dr. Jaroslaw Krzywanski
Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 250 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for assessment.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-anonymized peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Machine Learning and Knowledge Extraction is an international peer-reviewed open access monthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 1800 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • LLM-inspired ML
  • Bayesian learning methodology
  • hyperparameter optimization
  • uncertainty quantification
  • imbalanced data
  • survival analysis
  • financial forecasting

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

  • Ease of navigation: Grouping papers by topic helps scholars navigate broad scope journals more efficiently.
  • Greater discoverability: Special Issues support the reach and impact of scientific research. Articles in Special Issues are more discoverable and cited more frequently.
  • Expansion of research network: Special Issues facilitate connections among authors, fostering scientific collaborations.
  • External promotion: Articles in Special Issues are often promoted through the journal's social media, increasing their visibility.
  • Reprint: MDPI Books provides the opportunity to republish successful Special Issues in book format, both online and in print.

Further information on MDPI's Special Issue policies can be found here.

Published Papers (2 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

26 pages, 2722 KB  
Article
Deductive Logic in Language Models: Horizontal vs. Vertical Reasoning
by Davide Maltoni and Matteo Ferrara
Mach. Learn. Knowl. Extr. 2026, 8(7), 214; https://doi.org/10.3390/make8070214 - 21 Jul 2026
Viewed by 477
Abstract
Recent language models exhibit significant logical reasoning abilities, yet the mechanisms supporting deductive inference remain poorly understood. This paper studies small transformer-based language models trained from scratch on multi-step deductive tasks, focusing on the distinction between horizontal reasoning, where intermediate steps are generated [...] Read more.
Recent language models exhibit significant logical reasoning abilities, yet the mechanisms supporting deductive inference remain poorly understood. This paper studies small transformer-based language models trained from scratch on multi-step deductive tasks, focusing on the distinction between horizontal reasoning, where intermediate steps are generated autoregressively, and vertical reasoning, where inference unfolds implicitly across layers before the first output token is produced. We analyze two synthetic tasks: logical consequence over chains of symbolic implications and root-to-leaf navigation in binary trees. Mechanistic interpretability reveals that Chain-of-Thought supervision enables models to learn rule-based inference rather than statistical shortcuts. In the horizontal setting, a shallow attention-only model develops interpretable circuits for rule completion, rule chaining, and final decision making, largely implemented through induction-head-like mechanisms. We further introduce a truncated pseudoinverse method to decode the information carried by queries, keys, and values. For vertical reasoning, Chain-of-Thought appears to act less as explicit step-by-step guidance and more as a form of curriculum learning, helping the model acquire increasingly complex reasoning patterns. Without Chain-of-Thought, models tend to memorize or exploit dataset biases. These results provide a low-level account of how transformers can implement deductive reasoning and suggest how Chain-of-Thought may serve different functions in horizontal and vertical reasoning. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

28 pages, 3195 KB  
Article
What PISA Measures and What It Misses: A Two-Stage LLM-Based Alignment of IT Workforce Skills with Educational Proficiency
by Andreea-Maria Tanasă, Oprea Simona-Vasilica and Adela Bâra
Mach. Learn. Knowl. Extr. 2026, 8(6), 165; https://doi.org/10.3390/make8060165 - 15 Jun 2026
Viewed by 404
Abstract
Aligning information technology (IT) workforce demands with educational assessments is essential for bridging skills gaps; yet, no prior corpus maps IT task reasoning to Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA) proficiency levels. This paper introduces a large language model (LLM)-powered framework aligning IT [...] Read more.
Aligning information technology (IT) workforce demands with educational assessments is essential for bridging skills gaps; yet, no prior corpus maps IT task reasoning to Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA) proficiency levels. This paper introduces a large language model (LLM)-powered framework aligning IT competencies with PISA 2022 and the OECD (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development) Learning Compass 2030, drawing on O*NET v30.2 (Occupational Information Network), ESCO (European Skills, Competences, Qualifications, and Occupations) v1.2.1, PISA descriptors and OECD definitions. The framework operates in two stages: Stage 1 aligns 562 IT task statements with minimum PISA 2022 proficiency levels via LLM annotation and cross-model validation; and Stage 2 extends this mapping to the OECD Learning Compass 2030 through the semantic clustering of task embeddings and a bidirectional gap analysis of 95 ESCO transversal skills. Using Gemini 2.5 Flash, 562 tasks are annotated with minimum PISA levels across Mathematical, Reading, and Science literacy (first stage). Annotation reliability is assessed through a five-model cross-validation against a blind human domain expert (treated as a reference benchmark, not a gold standard) on a stratified 100-task sample (17.8% of the corpus), with agreement ranging from fair (Gemini 2.5 Flash, κ = 0.29) to moderate (Claude Haiku 4.5, κ = 0.50; LLaMA 3.3 70B, κ = 0.44). A bias-correction sensitivity analysis confirms that distributional findings remain stable after accounting for the primary annotator’s systematic overestimation, and OLS-calibrated alignment against O*NET ability ratings provides directional plausibility support. Validated tasks are embedded and clustered into 25 technical profiles via K-Means, each classified against OECD dimensions. The framework is extended to 95 ESCO transversal skills in 24 clusters. Bidirectional analysis reveals that, while every PISA proficiency level is engaged by at least one transversal cluster, 33% of these clusters, covering creative, ethical, social–emotional, and dispositional competencies, fall entirely outside PISA’s cognitive scope. This boundary mapping identifies where the PISA-based alignment is valid and where complementary tools are required for a full readiness assessment. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop