Current Research on Chinese Morphology

A special issue of Languages (ISSN 2226-471X).

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (1 April 2022) | Viewed by 18251

Special Issue Editors


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Linguistics, California State University, Fresno, CA 93740, USA
Interests: first and second language acquisition; language and cognition; Chinese linguistics; lexical semantics; morphosyntax; information structure

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Asian Languages and Cultures, University of Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA
Interests: Mandarin discourse and grammar; applied linguistics; corpus linguistics; computer data visualization

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

We are pleased to invite submissions for a Special Issue in Languages on “Current Research on Chinese Morphology”.

This proposed Special Issue of Languages invites papers from researchers who are interested in Chinese morphology. We encourage research on Chinese morphology from diverse subfields of language sciences, including Chinese linguistics, psycholinguistics, language acquisition, as well as theoretical, functional, corpus, and computational linguistics. Papers can be empirical or theoretical in nature and may address any question related to the typological features of Chinese morphology, interfaces between Chinese morphology, phonology syntax, semantics, and pragmatics, first and second language acquisition of Chinese morphology, processing of Chinese morphology, and language change and evolution. 

Chinese offers an interesting case for the crosslinguistic study of linguistic morphology. It is known as a morphologically impoverished language with no grammatical agreement and little morphophonemic and paradigmatic alternation, or inflection (e.g., Li and Thompson, 1981), but it has a range of inflectional and derivational affixes and morphological processes that are productive, and compounding constitutes a particularly productive and crucial area of Chinese morphology and grammar (e.g., Liao, 2018; Packard, 2000). A substantial amount of work on Chinese morphology has focused on: (i) the linguistic analyses of the formation, structure, and classification of different types of compounds in Chinese (Huang et al., 2018; Packard, 1998b); (ii) fundamental theoretical issues in morphology, such as the definition, distinction, and diagnosis of wordhood versus morphemes (bound and free) and phrases from phonological, morphological, and syntactic perspectives; the nature of morphemes (e.g., Dai, 1998; Duanmu, 1998); and head direction or headedness of compounds (e.g., Huang, 1998; Starosta et al., 1998); and (iii) argument structure of complex predicates such as resultative verb compounds (e.g., Chang, 1998; Duanmu, 1998), and verb–object compounds (e.g., Liao, 2018; Ross, 1998). Some studies have also examined word formation historically, e.g., word formation in classical Chinese (e.g., Baxter and Sagart, 1998; Feng, 1998), diachronic evolution and motivation of disyllabic words as a result of prosodic factors and changes in phonological shapes (e.g., tones, segments), and meaning as morphemes combine to form words (Feng, 2002, 2018).

Recent studies of Chinese morphology have extended the theoretical analyses to the linguistic and cognitive nature of Chinese words (Packard, 1998a; Packard, 2000) and the data-driven empirical approaches to the production and comprehension of Chinese words, e.g., lexical features of spoken Chinese in particular registers (conversational Chinese in Tao, 2015 and academic Chinese in Tao, 2021) and acquisition of verb compounds in production and comprehension (Chen, 2006, 2008, 2017). Many theoretical issues, however, remain to be empirically explored to enhance our understanding of the nature of the mental lexicon, the morphological rules and constraints on word formation, and the production, comprehension, and acquisition of such mental knowledge in naturalistic real-time language use in Chinese. For example, what is the psycholinguistic evidence for the mental reality of morphemes and morphological processes and rules in Chinese? How are words stored in the mental lexicon in Chinese? How are words retrieved, recognized, accessed, or produced when speaking, hearing, and reading in Chinese? What is the role of frequency of language use in cognitive processing of the Chinese lexicon? How does mental lexical and morphological knowledge of Chinese develop in typical and atypical child and second language learners of Chinese? How do Chinese words evolve and come into being or out of existence via lexicalization, abbreviation borrowing, or grammaticalization? How are new words created to fill the lexical gaps?

The aim of this Special Issue is to bring together cutting-edge research investigating Chinese morphology from diverse theoretical and empirical perspectives and shed light on the nature of the universal and language-specific properties of words and morphology in natural language, mental knowledge and psycholinguistic processes of word composition, formation, internal structure, morphological rules, and their development crosslinguistically.

We request that, prior to submitting a manuscript, interested authors initially submit a proposed title and an abstract of 400–600 words summarizing their intended contribution. Please send the abstract to the Guest Editor Dr. Jidong Chen ([email protected]) or to the Languages editorial office ([email protected]). Abstracts will be reviewed by the guest editors for the purposes of ensuring proper fit within the scope of the Special Issue. All papers will undergo peer review and will be published immediately upon acceptance.

The tentative completion schedule is as follows:

  • Abstract submission deadline: 22 October 2021
  • Notification of abstract acceptance: 31 October 2021
  • Full manuscript deadline: 1 April 2022

References:

Baxter, William H. and Laurent Sagart. 1998. New approaches to Chinese word formation. In New approaches to Chinese word formation, Edited by Jerome L. Packard. Berlin: De Gruyter, pp. 35–76.

Chang, Claire Hsun-huei. 1998. V-V compounds in Mandarin Chinese: Argument structure and semantics. In New approaches to Chinese word formation, Edited by Jerome L. Packard. Berlin: De Gruyter, pp. 77–102

Chen, Jidong. 2006. The acquisition of verb compounding in Mandarin. In Constructions in acquisition, Edited by E. V. Clark & B. F. Kelly. Stanford: CSLI, pp. 111–136

Chen, Jidong. 2008. The acquisition of verb compounding in Mandarin [Unpublished doctoral dissertation, The Max-Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics & Free University of Amsterdam]. Nijmegen & Amsterdam, the NL.

Chen, Jidong. 2017. When transparency doesn’t mean ease: Learning the meaning of resultative verb compounds in Mandarin Chinese. Journal of Child Language, 44(3), 695–718. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305000916000192

Dai, John Xiang-Ling. 1998. Syntactic, phonological, and morphological words in Chinese. In New approaches to Chinese word formation, Edited by Jerome L. Packard. Berlin: De Gruyter, pp. 103–134

Duanmu, San. 1998. Wordhood in Chinese. In New approaches to Chinese word formation, Edited by Jerome L. Packard. Berlin: De Gruyter, pp. 135–196

Feng, Shengli. 1998. Prosodic structure and compound words in classical Chinese. In New approaches to Chinese word formation, Edited by Jerome L. Packard. Berlin: De Gruyter, pp. 197–260

Feng, Shengli. 2002. Prosodic syntax and morphology in Chinese. Munich: Lincom Europa.

Feng, Shengli. 2018. Prosodic morphology in Mandarin Chinese. Oxfordshire: Routledge.

Huang, C.-T. James, Y.-H. Audrey Li and Andrew Simpson. 2018. The handbook of Chinese linguistics. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons.

Huang, Shuanfan. 1998. Chinese as a headless language in compounding morphology. In New approaches to Chinese word formation, Edited by Jerome L. Packard. Berlin: De Gruyter, pp. 261–284

Li, Charles N. and Sandra Thompson. 1981. Mandarin Chinese: A functional reference grammar. Berkeley: University of California Press.

Liao, Wei-Wen Roger. 2018. Morphology. In The handbook of Chinese linguistics, Edited by Huang, C.-T. James, Y.-H. Audrey Li and Andrew Simpson. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons. pp. 3–25

Packard, Jerome L.. 1998. A lexical phonology of Mandarin Chinese. In New approaches to Chinese word formation, Edited by Jerome L. Packard. Berlin: De Gruyter, pp. 311–328

Packard, Jerome L.. 1998.  New approaches to Chinese word formation. De Gruyter.

Packard, Jerome L.. 2000. The morphology of Chinese: A linguistic and cognitive approach. Cambridge:  Cambridge University Press.

Ross, Claudia. 1998. Cognate objects and the realization of thematic structure in Mandarin Chinese. In New approaches to Chinese word formation, Edited by Jerome L. Packard. Berlin: De Gruyter, pp. 329–346

Starosta, Stanley, Koenraad Kuiper, Siew-ai Ng and Zhi-qian Wu. 1998.  On defining the Chinese compound word: Headness in Chinese compounding and Chinese VR compounds. In New approaches to Chinese word formation, Edited by Jerome L. Packard. Berlin: De Gruyter, pp. 347–370

Hongyin, Tao. 2015. Profiling the Mandarin spoken vocabulary based on corpora. In Oxford handbook of Chinese linguistics, Edited by William Wang & Chaofen Sun. Oxford. Oxford University Press. pp. 336–347

Hongyin, Tao. 2021. Some lexical features of spoken academic Chinese and their pedagogical implications. Chinese Language Learning and Technology 1, 1–30. 

Prof. Dr. Jidong Chen
Prof. Dr. Hongyin Tao
Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a double-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Languages is an international peer-reviewed open access monthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 1400 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • Chinese morphology
  • inflectional
  • derivational
  • compounding
  • mental lexicon
  • lexicalization

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

  • Ease of navigation: Grouping papers by topic helps scholars navigate broad scope journals more efficiently.
  • Greater discoverability: Special Issues support the reach and impact of scientific research. Articles in Special Issues are more discoverable and cited more frequently.
  • Expansion of research network: Special Issues facilitate connections among authors, fostering scientific collaborations.
  • External promotion: Articles in Special Issues are often promoted through the journal's social media, increasing their visibility.
  • e-Book format: Special Issues with more than 10 articles can be published as dedicated e-books, ensuring wide and rapid dissemination.

Further information on MDPI's Special Issue polices can be found here.

Published Papers (7 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

11 pages, 956 KiB  
Article
Language Change and Morphological Processes in Contemporary Chinese: The Case of 健康码 (Health QR Code)
by Yun Xiao and Yi Ren
Languages 2023, 8(2), 123; https://doi.org/10.3390/languages8020123 - 4 May 2023
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 2306
Abstract
The Chinese language has witnessed remarkable changes in the past several decades, marked by a rapid rise of new words, frequent innovation of pseudo-affixes, and a notable increase in word length. By analyzing the creation, spread, and expansion of the new word 健康码 [...] Read more.
The Chinese language has witnessed remarkable changes in the past several decades, marked by a rapid rise of new words, frequent innovation of pseudo-affixes, and a notable increase in word length. By analyzing the creation, spread, and expansion of the new word 健康码 Jiankang-ma “health QR code”, this study sheds light on how language change takes place and how nonce formation is brought into being. Following the explosion of COVID-19 in China, 健康码 Jiankang-ma “health QR code” was created and promoted by the local and central governments and subsequently generated a large XX-码 XX-ma “XX-code” word family through various morphological processes, such as abbreviation, clipping, derivation, and analogy, where -码 -ma “-code” has acquired some new meaning distinct from its original form as a bound root. Linguistically, 健康码 Jiankang-ma “health QR code” is a three-morpheme word in a 2 + 1 length pattern, which phonologically consists of a single super foot that makes the expression catchy and appealing. The highly productive AB-C internal structure makes -码 -ma “-code”, although not yet a fully grammaticalized affix, a strong pseudo-suffix that has high morphological productivity with a fixed suffix positioning. Given the high frequency of the lexical 码 ma “code” in contemporary Chinese language use, the pseudo-suffix -码 -ma “-code” may, however, not completely replace it in the long run, as principles of grammaticalization theories predict. Instead, it is likely that both the lexical 码ma “code” and the pseudo-suffix -码 -ma “-code” will coexist side by side along split pathways. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Current Research on Chinese Morphology)
17 pages, 3455 KiB  
Article
The Role Classifiers Play in Selecting the Referent of a Word
by Weiyi Ma, Peng Zhou and Roberta Michnick Golinkoff
Languages 2023, 8(1), 84; https://doi.org/10.3390/languages8010084 - 14 Mar 2023
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1944
Abstract
An important cue to the meaning of a new noun is its accompanying classifier. For example, in English, X in “a sheet of X” should refer to a broad, flat object. A classifier is required in Chinese to quantify nouns. Using children’s overt [...] Read more.
An important cue to the meaning of a new noun is its accompanying classifier. For example, in English, X in “a sheet of X” should refer to a broad, flat object. A classifier is required in Chinese to quantify nouns. Using children’s overt responses in an object/picture selection task, past research found reliable semantic knowledge of classifiers in Mandarin-reared children at around age three. However, it is unclear how children’s semantic knowledge differs across different types of classifiers and how this difference develops with age. Here we use an arguably more sensitive measure of children’s language knowledge (the intermodal preferential-looking paradigm) to examine Mandarin-reared three-, four-, and five-year-olds’ semantic knowledge of four types of classifiers indicating animacy (human vs. animal distinction), configuration (how objects are arrayed), object shape, and vehicle function. Multiple factors were matched across classifier types: the number of classifiers, perceived familiarity and perceived typicality of the target, and the visual similarity of the two images paired together. Children’s performances differed across classifier types, as they were better with animacy classifiers than with configuration and vehicle function classifiers. Their comprehension was reliable for animacy, object shape, and vehicle function classifiers but not for configuration classifiers. Furthermore, we did not find conclusive evidence for an age-dependent improvement in the child’s performance. The analysis, including the oldest (five-year-olds) and youngest (three-year-olds) children, revealed a marginally significant age effect. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Current Research on Chinese Morphology)
Show Figures

Figure 1

33 pages, 4897 KiB  
Article
Revisiting the Modal Verb huì with an Interactional Linguistic Approach
by Yan Zhou
Languages 2022, 7(4), 294; https://doi.org/10.3390/languages7040294 - 21 Nov 2022
Viewed by 2423
Abstract
This study takes an interactional linguistics and conversation analysis-based approach to analyze the modal verb huì ‘will’ in the recurrent formular of commissive actions, [wǒ huì X (de)] ‘I will X.’ Data analyses show that this format has two variations differentiated [...] Read more.
This study takes an interactional linguistics and conversation analysis-based approach to analyze the modal verb huì ‘will’ in the recurrent formular of commissive actions, [wǒ huì X (de)] ‘I will X.’ Data analyses show that this format has two variations differentiated by the prosodic stress on huì. The format with the unstressed huì is often observed in turn-initiating position where the speaker offers to perform a future action or informs the recipient of their arrangement of an established activity. The format with the stressed huì appears in both initiating and responding positions although it is less frequently observed. Stressed huì is often used to reassure the recipient of an existing commitment to performing a future action. This study highlights the significance of prosody in the study of modal verbs and the benefits of studying individual words in a linguistic formula situated in specific interactional contexts. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Current Research on Chinese Morphology)
Show Figures

Figure 1

16 pages, 4298 KiB  
Article
Acquisition of the Epistemic Discourse Marker Wo Juede by Native Taiwan Mandarin Speakers
by Chun-Yin Doris Chen, Chung-Yu Wu and Hongyin Tao
Languages 2022, 7(4), 292; https://doi.org/10.3390/languages7040292 - 15 Nov 2022
Viewed by 1732
Abstract
This study examines the use of a fixed expression, wo juede (WJ) ‘I feel, I think’, in Taiwan Mandarin in the context of two types of oral production tasks: argumentative and negotiative discourses. The participants consisted of two groups used for [...] Read more.
This study examines the use of a fixed expression, wo juede (WJ) ‘I feel, I think’, in Taiwan Mandarin in the context of two types of oral production tasks: argumentative and negotiative discourses. The participants consisted of two groups used for comparison: one group of children from Grades 2, 4, and 6, and one group of adults (college students). The results show that both groups were more inclined to utilize WJ in argumentative genres than in negotiative genres. Of the seven pragmatic functions associated with WJ, the participants all had a strong preference to use WJ for the commenting/reasoning function. Developmental patterns gleaned from the data indicate that children’s language expands as their age increases. The implications of the findings for cross-linguistic comparison in the realm of epistemic modality are explored in this paper. This study contributes to the study of Chinese morphology by drawing more attention to the acquisition and development patterns of fixed expressions in larger chunks. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Current Research on Chinese Morphology)
Show Figures

Figure 1

19 pages, 2303 KiB  
Article
Processing Gapped and Gapless Relative Clauses in Mandarin: Evidence from Event–Related Brain Potentials
by Zhiying Qian and Jerome Packard
Languages 2022, 7(4), 254; https://doi.org/10.3390/languages7040254 - 29 Sep 2022
Viewed by 1693
Abstract
This paper reports an event–related potential (ERP) study examining the processing of “gapless” relative clauses (RCs), normal (“gapped”) RCs, attributive clauses, Subject–Verb–Object (SVO) forms and the morphological markers de and le in Mandarin Chinese. The objectives were to (1) determine whether a processing [...] Read more.
This paper reports an event–related potential (ERP) study examining the processing of “gapless” relative clauses (RCs), normal (“gapped”) RCs, attributive clauses, Subject–Verb–Object (SVO) forms and the morphological markers de and le in Mandarin Chinese. The objectives were to (1) determine whether a processing cost signature can be identified for gap–filler processing by comparing gapped RCs with SVO forms; and (2) determine whether processing gapless RCs is more similar to processing gapped RCs that they resemble on surface or attributive clauses that they resemble structurally by comparing gapped RCs, gapless RCs, and attributive clauses. ERP data was collected from 27 native speakers as they read 160 sentences containing gapped, gapless, attributive, and SVO sentences, which differed only in the second word of the string (e.g., 教授设计的/烧菜的/助手的/设计了/那个广告… The professor designed Ø/cooked food/assistant’s/designed that advertisement…). Results indicate that (1) the head noun evoked larger N400 and P600 components and the determiner elicited a larger sustained anterior negativity for the gapped RCs than for the SVO forms, and (2) the word immediately following the head noun evoked a larger P600 and the determiner elicited a larger sustained anterior negativity for both gapped and gapless RCs than for attributive clauses. These results indicate that (1) gap–filler integration in Mandarin is both semantic (hence the N400) and syntactic (hence the P600) in nature, and (2) gapless RCs are neurophysiologically processed more like gapped RCs than attributive clauses. The ERP signatures to verb+le, verb+de, verbs with verb–object (VO)+de morphological structure, and noun+de revealed that the processing costs for VO verbs and noun modifications were higher than for simple verbs, and the morphological markers de and le induced similar processing costs, even though de triggered the positing of a syntactic gap whereas le did not. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Current Research on Chinese Morphology)
Show Figures

Figure 1

18 pages, 2161 KiB  
Article
Acquisition of Chinese Verb Separation by Adult L2 Learners
by Zhe Gao, Seth Wiener and Brian MacWhinney
Languages 2022, 7(3), 225; https://doi.org/10.3390/languages7030225 - 29 Aug 2022
Cited by 3 | Viewed by 3103
Abstract
Chinese verb separation is a grammatical construction in which a bimorphemic verb compound separates and expands into a verb phrase. For example, to say “sang one song”, one must insert the aspect marker le and classifier phrase yī shǒu between the verb [...] Read more.
Chinese verb separation is a grammatical construction in which a bimorphemic verb compound separates and expands into a verb phrase. For example, to say “sang one song”, one must insert the aspect marker le and classifier phrase yī shǒu between the verb chàng gē ‘sing-song’ as in chàng le yī shǒu gē (sing-LE-one-classifier-song). Adult second language (L2) learners face at least three problems related to acquiring verb separation: separation patterns are complex and numerous, classroom oral input is limited, and L1 transfer often fails. To better understand L2 learners’ acquisition of verb separation, this study tested 28 adult L2-Chinese classroom learners. Three tasks were administered online: verb decomposition, grammaticality judgment, and oral translation. On average, only 37% of verbs were accurately decomposed, 63% of verbs were accurately judged to be grammatical, and 19% of verbs were orally produced with the correct separation pattern. Chinese verb separation, particularly decomposition and oral production, is thus extremely challenging for L2 learners to acquire—even for advanced learners with a relatively large vocabulary size. The results are discussed in terms of the Unified Competition Model and L2 Chinese pedagogy. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Current Research on Chinese Morphology)
Show Figures

Figure 1

20 pages, 1989 KiB  
Article
Learning the Lexical Semantics of Mandarin Monomorphemic State-Change Verbs by English-Speaking Learners of Mandarin Chinese
by Jidong Chen and Zhiying Qian
Languages 2022, 7(3), 215; https://doi.org/10.3390/languages7030215 - 11 Aug 2022
Viewed by 2218
Abstract
Languages vary systematically in how semantic information is “packaged” in verbs and verb-related constructions. Mandarin Chinese contrasts typologically with English in its lexicalization of state change. Most Mandarin monomorphemic verbs are moot about or imply a state change, whereas many English monomorphemic verbs [...] Read more.
Languages vary systematically in how semantic information is “packaged” in verbs and verb-related constructions. Mandarin Chinese contrasts typologically with English in its lexicalization of state change. Most Mandarin monomorphemic verbs are moot about or imply a state change, whereas many English monomorphemic verbs (e.g., kill, break) entail the fulfillment of a state change. Recent studies suggest that Mandarin monomorphemic verbs form a continuum in the strength of state-change implicature. State-change verbs have been found difficult for first language (L1) learners. This study reports two experiments that investigate the lexical semantic knowledge of Mandarin monomorphemic implied or moot state-change verbs by intermediate (N = 19, mean age 21) and advanced (N = 12, mean age 21) English-speaking second language (L2) learners of Mandarin Chinese. The results reveal L2 learners’ general preference for the state-change interpretation for the monomorphemic verbs and their limited sensitivity to the nuanced strength of state-change implicature in the Mandarin verbs. Typological differences in the lexicalization of state change are argued to contribute to the difficulties in L2 learning of the lexical semantics in the semantic domain of state change in Mandarin. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Current Research on Chinese Morphology)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop