Advances in the Investigation of L3 Speech Perception

A special issue of Languages (ISSN 2226-471X).

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (15 August 2024) | Viewed by 1865

Special Issue Editors


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
English Department, University of Münster, Johannisstr. 12-20, 48143 Münster, Germany
Interests: L2 speech perception; L3 speech perception; L2 speech production; L3 speech production; the age factor; pluralistic teaching approaches

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Faculty of English, Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznań, Poland
Interests: L2 speech perception; L3 speech perception; non-native speech perception; L2 speech production; L3 speech production; vowel systems

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

Although research into third language (L3) phonetic and phonological acquisition has seen growing interest in the last decade (see e.g. Wrembel 2023 for a review), there is great paucity of perceptual studies in this area of multilingual research. As noted by Cabrelli Amaro (2010) more than ten years ago, this is rather unfortunate considering that the most influential second language (L2) speech learning models (SLM, Flege 1995, Flege & Bohn, 2021; PAM-L2, Best & Tyler 2007) predict the acquisition of non-native speech in relation to the learners’ perception of similarities and differences between the sounds of their languages. Our current understanding of the process of L3 speech learning is thus partial at best if primarily based on findings stemming from production studies.

The few empirical studies that have investigated (the development of) perceptual abilities by multilingual learners suggest a complex interaction between their native and non-native sound systems (Wrembel et al. 2019, Nelson 2020, Parrish 2022, Kędzierska et al. 2023). The process of multilingual speech perception seems to be feature-dependent and marked by great intra- and inter-individual variation (Wrembel et al. 2020, Gut at al. 2023), but more research including a diversity of language combinations and learner groups is needed to advance our understanding of the linguistic representation in the multilingual mind. In addition, there is no consensus on the most appropriate method of measuring segmental and suprasegmental perception in multilinguals as well as their perceived cross-linguistic phonetic similarity.

Thus, we welcome contributions that advance the field of L3 speech perception on topics that include (but are not limited to) the following: development in L3 learners’ segmental and suprasegmental perception, perceived cross-linguistic phonetic similarity and changes thereof overtime, the role of individual learner differences in the process of L3 speech perception, and methodologically-oriented contributions.

We request that, prior to submitting a manuscript, interested authors initially submit a proposed title and an abstract of 400–600 words summarizing their intended contribution. Please send it to the Guest Editors Romana Kopečková ([email protected]) and Anna Balas ([email protected]), and to the Languages editorial office ([email protected]) by 15 January 2024. Abstracts will be reviewed by the Guest Editors for the purposes of ensuring proper fit within the scope of this Special Issue. Full manuscripts will undergo a double-blind peer-review process.

Tentative completion schedule:
• Abstract submission deadline: 29 February 2024
• Notification of abstract acceptance: 1 March 2024
• Full manuscript deadline: 15 August 2024

References

Best, C. T., & Tyler, M. D. (2007). Nonnative and second-language speech perception: Commonalities and complementarities. In M. Munro, & O.-S. Bohn (Eds.), Language Experience in Second Language Speech Learning: In Honor of James Flege, (pp. 13-34). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Cabrelli Amaro, J. (2010). L3 phonology. An understudied domain. In J. Cabrelli Amaro, S. Flynn, & J. Rothman (Eds.), Third Language Acquisition in Adulthood, (pp. 33-60). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Flege, J. E. (1995). Second language speech learning: Theory, findings and problems. In W. Strange (Ed.), Speech Perception and Linguistic Experience, (pp. 233–277). Baltimore: York Press.

Flege, J. E., & Bohn, O.-S. (2021). The revised Speech Learning Model. In R. Wayland (Ed.), Second Language Speech Learning. Theoretical and Empirical Progress, (pp. 84–118). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Gut, U., Kopečková, R., & Nelson, C. (2023). Phonetics and Phonology in Multilingual Language Development. Elements in Phonetics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Kędzierska, H., Rataj, K., Balas, A., & Wrembel, M. (2023). Vowel perception in multilingual speakers: ERP evidence from Polish, English and Norwegian. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, 1-12.

Nelson, C. (2020). The younger, the better? Speech perception development in adolescent vs. adult L3 learners. Yearbook of the Poznań Linguistic Meeting, 6(1), 27–58.

Parrish, K. (2022). The categorization of L3 vowels near first exposure by Spanish-English bilinguals. Languages, 7 (3), 226.

Wrembel, M. (2023). Exploring the acquisition of L3 phonology: Challenges, new insights, and future directions. In J. Cabrelli, A. Chaouch-Orozco, J. González Alonso, S. M. Pereira Soares, E. Puig-Mayenco, & J. Rothman (Eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Third Language Acquisition, (pp. 115-141), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Wrembel, M., Gut, U., Kopečková, R., & Balas, A. (2020). Cross-linguistic interactions in third-language acquisition: Evidence from multi-feature analysis of speech perception. Languages, 5(4), 52.

Wrembel, M., Marecka, M., & Kopečková, R. (2019). Extending perceptual assimilation model to L3 phonological acquisition. International Journal of Multilingualism, 16(4), 1-21.

Dr. Romana Kopečková
Prof. Dr. Anna Balas
Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a double-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Languages is an international peer-reviewed open access monthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 1400 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • L3 perception
  • cross-linguistic phonetic similarity
  • L3 phonology
  • multilingual

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

  • Ease of navigation: Grouping papers by topic helps scholars navigate broad scope journals more efficiently.
  • Greater discoverability: Special Issues support the reach and impact of scientific research. Articles in Special Issues are more discoverable and cited more frequently.
  • Expansion of research network: Special Issues facilitate connections among authors, fostering scientific collaborations.
  • External promotion: Articles in Special Issues are often promoted through the journal's social media, increasing their visibility.
  • e-Book format: Special Issues with more than 10 articles can be published as dedicated e-books, ensuring wide and rapid dissemination.

Further information on MDPI's Special Issue polices can be found here.

Published Papers (2 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

27 pages, 2952 KiB  
Article
Predicting Discrimination in L3 Portuguese by Hungarian Speakers: The Effect of Perceptual Overlap
by Gabriela Tavares, Andrea Deme and Susana Correia
Languages 2024, 9(11), 352; https://doi.org/10.3390/languages9110352 - 20 Nov 2024
Viewed by 563
Abstract
Perceptual overlap has been attested as significantly contributing to difficulties in L2 speech perception. The current study aims at investigating whether this effect is also observable in the context of L3, specifically in the perception of European Portuguese oral vowels by Hungarian listeners. [...] Read more.
Perceptual overlap has been attested as significantly contributing to difficulties in L2 speech perception. The current study aims at investigating whether this effect is also observable in the context of L3, specifically in the perception of European Portuguese oral vowels by Hungarian listeners. We crossed the results of two experiments—a categorization task and a discrimination task—and found that perceptual overlap is also a significant factor in L3 perception. Furthermore, we compared different measures of perceptual overlap as predictors for discrimination abilities of L3 vowel contrasts. Namely, we compared perceptual overlap scores calculated on group means and scores based on individual results. None of the measures was conclusively more reliable than another in predicting differences in discrimination difficulties. However, accuracy in perception of EP contrasts or vowels absent from the Hungarian vocalic system was significantly lower than for the other vowels, suggesting that non-nativeness can cause difficulties in L3 perception. Additionally, participants who also reported knowledge of German performed more accurately in discrimination of contrasts that included the vowel [ɐ], a vowel absent from their L1 but present in the German vocalic system, indicating a positive effect of knowledge of languages previously acquired on L3 perception. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in the Investigation of L3 Speech Perception)
Show Figures

Figure 1

22 pages, 3850 KiB  
Article
Perception of European Portuguese Mid-Vowels by Ukrainian–Russian Bilinguals
by Vita V. Kogan and Gabriela Tavares
Languages 2024, 9(11), 350; https://doi.org/10.3390/languages9110350 - 18 Nov 2024
Viewed by 567
Abstract
Mid-vowel contrasts often present perceptual challenges for speakers of languages that lack these distinctions. However, bilingual speakers, who have access to two phonological systems and exhibit greater metalinguistic awareness, might not necessarily encounter such difficulties. In this study, 27 Ukrainian–Russian bilinguals listened to [...] Read more.
Mid-vowel contrasts often present perceptual challenges for speakers of languages that lack these distinctions. However, bilingual speakers, who have access to two phonological systems and exhibit greater metalinguistic awareness, might not necessarily encounter such difficulties. In this study, 27 Ukrainian–Russian bilinguals listened to an unfamiliar language, European Portuguese, and completed two tasks: an identification task where they assimilated the seven stressed oral Portuguese vowels to the closest Ukrainian categories and a discrimination task featuring the Portuguese vowel contrasts /ɛ/–/e/, /e/–/i/, /ɔ/–/o/, and /o/–/u/. No bilingual advantage was observed: the discrimination performance on all contrasts was slightly above or near a chance level (A-prime scores varied between 0.55 and 0.20). These perceptual difficulties may be attributed to the acoustic similarities between the vowels within the contrasts rather than to the differences between the phonological inventories of the languages (the most challenging contrast was not a mid-vowel contrast but acoustically similar /o/–/u/). Although with the back mid-vowel contrast, the difficulty seems to also stem from the possibility that both Ukrainian and Russian have only one back mid-vowel, /o/, and this category occupies a wider area in the vowel space of Ukrainian–Russian bilinguals. The results suggest that bilingual advantage does not always manifest itself in the perception of a new language, especially if two typologically close languages are involved. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in the Investigation of L3 Speech Perception)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop