Current Trends in Ecolinguistics

A special issue of Languages (ISSN 2226-471X).

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (20 April 2024) | Viewed by 6981

Special Issue Editor


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Dipartimento di Scienze Politiche e Sociali, Università Degli Studi di Catania, Catania, Italy
Interests: ecolinguistics; political discourse analysis; migration

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

Ecolinguistic research provides the scientific foundation for understanding the complex web of interactions among language, the non-human world, and the environment. As human activities continue to shape the world, ecolinguistics remains a cornerstone for the promotion of sustainability (Stibbe 2019), conservation of habitats (Blackmore and Holmes 2013), and the well-being of ecosystems and human societies. Ecolinguistics sheds light on how language can facilitate or hinder sustainable environmental practices and broaden our understanding of the ecological interconnectedness of our world (Goatly 2001; Stibbe 2015). A strong understanding of these issues has never been more necessary, and it is our hope that ecolinguistics will continue to evolve and increase its influence on current and future generations’ attitudes towards nature and the non-human world (Zhou 2022).

In this Special Issue, we focus on research that highlights current trends in ecolinguistics (Finke 2018; Lechevrel 2009; Huang 2016). We welcome contributions from a broad range of ecolinguistic topics, that focus, for example, on the following topics:

For a list of possible topics, see also those in Fill and Mühlhäusler (2001).

The purposes of this Special Issue are to contribute to the ongoing elaboration of ecolinguistic research in these areas, to outline methodological approaches for ecolinguistic research, to carry forward the themes of past Ecolinguistic research and develop new and inspiring perspectives for future projects.

We request that, prior to submitting a manuscript, interested authors initially submit a proposed title and an abstract of 400–600 words summarizing their intended contribution. Please send it to the guest editors ( and [email protected]). Abstracts will be reviewed by the Guest Editors for the purposes of ensuring proper fit within the scope of the Special Issue. Full manuscripts will undergo double-blind peer-review.

Tentative Completion Schedule

Abstract Submission Deadline 1 November 2023
Notification of Abstract Acceptance 1 December 2023
Full Manuscript Deadline 1 April 2024

References

Alexander, Richard. 2008. “How the Anti-Green Movement and Its ‘Friends’ Use Language to Construct the World.” In Language, Signs, and Nature: Ecolinguistic Dimensions of Environmental Discourse ; Essays in Honour of Alwin Fill, edited by Martin Döring, Hermine Penz, and Wilhelm Trampe, 127–142. Stauffenburg Festschriften. Tübingen: Stauffenburg.

Alexander, Richard. 2002. “Everyone Is Talking about ‘Sustainable Development’. Can They All Mean the Same Thing? Computer Discourse Analysis of Ecological Texts.” In Colourful Green Ideas: Papers from the Conference “30 Years of Language and Ecology,” edited by A Fill, H Penz, and W Trampe, 239–254. Peter Lang.

———. 2013. Common Cause for Nature: Values and Frames in Conservation, edited by Blackmore, Elena, and Tim Holmes Machynlleth. Wales: Public Interest Research Centre.

Cachelin, Adrienne, Russell Norvell, and Ann Darling. 2010. “Language Fouls in Teaching Ecology: Why Traditional Metaphors Undermine Conservation Literacy.” Conservation Biology 24 (3): 669–674. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2010.01481.x.

Caimotto, M. Cristina. 2020. Discourses of Cycling, Road Users and Sustainability: An Ecolinguistic Investigation (Postdisciplinary Studies in Discourse). 1st ed. 2020. Palgrave Macmillan.

Döring, Martin, Hermine. Penz, and Wilhelm. Trampe. 2008. Language, Signs and Nature: Ecolinguistic Dimensions of Environmental Discourse : Essays in Honour of Alwin Fill. Tübingen: Stauffenburg Verlag.

Fill, Alwin, and Peter Mühlhäusler. 2001. The Ecolinguistics Reader: Language, Ecology, and Environment. London: Continuum.

Finke, Peter. 2014. “The Ecology of Science and Its Consequences for the Ecology of Language.” Language Sciences 41 (January): 71–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2013.08.008.

———. 2018. “Transdisciplinary Ecolinguistics.” In The Routledge Handbook of Ecolinguistics, edited by Alwin Fill and Hermine Penz, 1 edition, 406–419. London: Routledge.

Goatly, Andrew. 2001. “Green Grammar and Grammatical Metaphor, or Language and Myth of Power, or Metaphors We Die By.” In The Ecolinguistics Reader: Language, Ecology, and Environment, edited by Alwin Fill and Peter Mühlhäusler, 203–225. London: Continuum.

Goatly, ANDREW. 2002. “The Representation of Nature on the BBC World Service.” Text - Interdisciplinary Journal for the Study of Discourse 22 (1): 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1515/text.2002.003.

Huang, G. 2016. “Ecolinguistics in an International Context: An Interview with Arran Stibbe.” Language & Ecology, 1–10.

Lechevrel, Nadège. 2009. “The Intertwined Histories of Ecolinguistics and Ecological Approaches of Language(s) : Historical and Theoretical Aspects of a Research Paradigm.” In Symposium on Ecolinguistics: The Ecology of Science. University of Southern Denmark.

Naess, A. 1975. “The Shallow and the Long Range, Deep Ecology Movement.” In The Deep Ecology Movement: An Introductory Anthology, edited by A Drengson and Y Inoue, 3–10. North Atlantic Books.

Stibbe, Arran. 2015. Ecolinguistics: Language, Ecology and the Stories We Live By. 1st ed. London: Routledge.

———. 2017. “Positive Discourse Analysis: Re-Thinking Human Ecological Relationships.” In The Routledge Handbook of Ecolinguistics, edited by Alwin Fill and Hermine Penz, 165–78. London: Routledge.

———. 2019. “Education for Sustainability and the Search for New Stories to Live By.” In Prioritizing Sustainability Education: A Comprehensive Approach, edited by Joan Armon, Stephen Scoffham, and Chara Armon, 1 edition, 233–243. London ; New York: Routledge.

Xue, Yahong, and Qianqiu Xu. 2021. “An Ecological Discourse Analysis of News Coverage of COVID-19 in China in The Times and The New York Times.” Journal of World Languages 7 (1): 80–103. https://doi.org/10.1515/jwl-2021-0005.

Zhou, Wenjuan. 2022. “Ecolinguistics: A Half-Century Overview.” Journal of World Languages 7 (3): 461–486. https://doi.org/10.1515/jwl-2021-0022.

Dr. Douglas Mark Ponton
Guest Editor

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a double-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Languages is an international peer-reviewed open access monthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 1400 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • ecolinguistics
  • the environment
  • sustainability
  • green visions
  • positive discourse analysis
  • ecocriticism

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

  • Ease of navigation: Grouping papers by topic helps scholars navigate broad scope journals more efficiently.
  • Greater discoverability: Special Issues support the reach and impact of scientific research. Articles in Special Issues are more discoverable and cited more frequently.
  • Expansion of research network: Special Issues facilitate connections among authors, fostering scientific collaborations.
  • External promotion: Articles in Special Issues are often promoted through the journal's social media, increasing their visibility.
  • e-Book format: Special Issues with more than 10 articles can be published as dedicated e-books, ensuring wide and rapid dissemination.

Further information on MDPI's Special Issue polices can be found here.

Published Papers (4 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

15 pages, 375 KiB  
Article
Comparative Discourse Strategies in Environmental Advocacy: Analysing the Rhetoric of Greta Thunberg and Chris Packham
by Douglas Mark Ponton and Anna Raimo
Languages 2024, 9(9), 307; https://doi.org/10.3390/languages9090307 - 23 Sep 2024
Viewed by 1196
Abstract
This paper examines the rhetoric and argumentation of two prominent environmental activists, Greta Thunberg and Chris Packham. From the perspective of Ecolinguistics, Thunberg has given voice to a generational movement for change, galvanising young people everywhere through high-profile protests and speeches. Packham represents [...] Read more.
This paper examines the rhetoric and argumentation of two prominent environmental activists, Greta Thunberg and Chris Packham. From the perspective of Ecolinguistics, Thunberg has given voice to a generational movement for change, galvanising young people everywhere through high-profile protests and speeches. Packham represents British mainstream environmentalism, notably as the presenter of the acclaimed nature documentary ‘Springwatch’. We argue that their influence partially stems from their alignment with dominant cultural narratives: Thunberg’s emphasis on intergenerational discord and Packham’s connection to the natural world. We analyse both figures via the lens of the ‘emotionalisation of media discourse’, highlighting argumentation strategies that feature expressions of negative emotions of which anger is a type. Thunberg’s famous ‘How dare you?’ outburst at the 2019 UN Climate Action Summit and Packham’s statement to Novara Media, ‘I am more angry now than at any point since my 20s’, exemplify this trend. We explore the pragmatic implications of their argumentative and discursive strategies, suggesting that while both have significantly elevated the profile of ecological activism, their discourse may also have a potentially divisive aspect. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Current Trends in Ecolinguistics)
12 pages, 321 KiB  
Article
Retelling the Story of the Birds and the Bees in the Age of Biodiversity Extinction
by Richard John Alexander
Languages 2024, 9(9), 295; https://doi.org/10.3390/languages9090295 - 3 Sep 2024
Viewed by 1094
Abstract
John Lovejoy coined the term biological diversity in 1980, made the first projection of global extinction rates, and 43 years later we are still discussing biodiversity and extinction in an inconsequential fashion. Extinction signs include the loss of millions of birds in the [...] Read more.
John Lovejoy coined the term biological diversity in 1980, made the first projection of global extinction rates, and 43 years later we are still discussing biodiversity and extinction in an inconsequential fashion. Extinction signs include the loss of millions of birds in the UK since 1970 and the decline in insects. Goulson summarizes in detail the scientific and biological evidence for the many species extinctions. Although most people do not notice the declines in insects, the loss of bees has been noted when bees’ use as pollinators began to be harnessed as a corporate and commercial activity. This is linked to intensive agricultural practices. The lobbying power of agrochemical companies shapes agricultural practices that directly impact the well-being of all species. Critical ecological discourse analysis of insect decline and the issues related to it is employed, going back to the famous speech given by Michael Halliday. Then corpus linguistic methods scrutinize material from the website of Syngenta, an agrochemical company. We ask whether the website of such a firm can uncover the necessary circumstances for such biodiversity. A corpus-assisted critical analysis of Syngenta’s business report, looks at computer-generated concordances of some of the relevant content words, like ‘crop’, ‘sustainable’, ‘soil’, ‘control’, ‘biodiversity’ and ‘water’. Hopefully, this study will encourage researchers to provide more indications of the disappearance of so many species, and not just birds and insects. But, to really achieve effective protection of biodiversity much more is needed. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Current Trends in Ecolinguistics)
14 pages, 371 KiB  
Article
Made in Languaging; Ecolinguistic Expertise
by Stephen J. Cowley
Languages 2024, 9(7), 252; https://doi.org/10.3390/languages9070252 - 17 Jul 2024
Viewed by 795
Abstract
Made in languaging aims to help ecolinguists with recrafting ideation and human practices. Inspired by Alexander and Stibbe, I turn to how ecolinguistic expertise can favour life-sustaining relations. In approaching normative goals, I start with how knowledge is made, self-sustains and is disseminated. [...] Read more.
Made in languaging aims to help ecolinguists with recrafting ideation and human practices. Inspired by Alexander and Stibbe, I turn to how ecolinguistic expertise can favour life-sustaining relations. In approaching normative goals, I start with how knowledge is made, self-sustains and is disseminated. Ecolinguistic analysis of languages, discourse and narratives can thus be enriched by tracing how practices inform languaging. In turning to epistemic agency, I emphasise the following: (1) building corpora popularia, organised bodies, in order to enhance life-sustaining relations; (2) illuminating life from the inside; and (3) developing bioecological awareness. I contend that, while all living beings use coordinative activities to bring forth what appears to us, humans also use wording types and practices. As we use the already known, languaging enables subjecthood, a person’s little worlds, and a group’s common realities. Hence, what appears as (and to) experience is made in languaging. When linked to normative concerns, the resulting middle worlds also offer means of putting knowledge to work. As in social epistemology, one might regard ‘wealth and well-being’ as a marker of public good. Yet, critical work shows, appeal to these values is anthropomorphic. In order to encompass nonhumans and the biogenic, one can reject market orientatation by tracing languaging, and knowing, back to living. In showing benefits of so doing, I contrast two evolving wording types. The case of growthism, I suggest, attests to praxis and contrasts starkly with the ideational value of life-sustaining relations. Yet, in both cases, languaging meshes practices, happenings and the effects of action. The move shows how one can challenge the hypostatisation of ideology by pursuing how epistemic agency can contribute to the future of evolution. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Current Trends in Ecolinguistics)
17 pages, 373 KiB  
Article
Mobility Justice: An Ecolinguistic Perspective
by Maria Cristina Caimotto
Languages 2024, 9(7), 242; https://doi.org/10.3390/languages9070242 - 8 Jul 2024
Viewed by 953
Abstract
The climate crisis, migration and urbanization may appear as three separate crises, but under Sheller’s paradigm of Mobility Justice, they become part of a coherent whole that should be tackled as a single, complex and interconnected predicament. This paper observes rhetorical strategies employed [...] Read more.
The climate crisis, migration and urbanization may appear as three separate crises, but under Sheller’s paradigm of Mobility Justice, they become part of a coherent whole that should be tackled as a single, complex and interconnected predicament. This paper observes rhetorical strategies employed in texts about the climate crisis, about cycling advocacy and about the “climate lockdown” conspiracy theory, which developed in Oxford, UK, in 2023. The metaphors, deictic pronouns and identity categories used are the main discourse features analysed through a qualitative approach, showing how mobility-related issues are often discussed through spatial metaphors, while deictic pronouns play a central role in the creation of identities. The findings are employed to contribute to the beneficial reframing of mobility-related discourses, whether global or local, and to react to climate inaction. The overall aim of this approach is to reveal the links between discourses about the climate crisis on a global scale and those on a local, urban scale concerning urban mobility policies. The prism through which both global and local discourses are observed is that of space and access to mobility. The aim of this investigation is to identify new patterns of language that can help us finding “new stories to live by”. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Current Trends in Ecolinguistics)
Back to TopTop