Current Trends in Ecolinguistics

A special issue of Languages (ISSN 2226-471X).

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (20 April 2024) | Viewed by 2901

Special Issue Editors


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Dipartimento di Scienze Politiche e Sociali, Università Degli Studi di Catania, Catania, Italy
Interests: ecolinguistics; political discourse analysis; migration

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Dipartimento di Scienze Motorie e del Benessere, Università degli Studi Di Napoli Parthenope, Napoli, Italy
Interests: multimodal discourse analysis; ecolinguistics; pragmatics

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

Ecolinguistic research provides the scientific foundation for understanding the complex web of interactions among language, the non-human world, and the environment. As human activities continue to shape the world, ecolinguistics remains a cornerstone for the promotion of sustainability (Stibbe 2019), conservation of habitats (Blackmore and Holmes 2013), and the well-being of ecosystems and human societies. Ecolinguistics sheds light on how language can facilitate or hinder sustainable environmental practices and broaden our understanding of the ecological interconnectedness of our world (Goatly 2001; Stibbe 2015). A strong understanding of these issues has never been more necessary, and it is our hope that ecolinguistics will continue to evolve and increase its influence on current and future generations’ attitudes towards nature and the non-human world (Zhou 2022).

In this Special Issue, we focus on research that highlights current trends in ecolinguistics (Finke 2018; Lechevrel 2009; Huang 2016). We welcome contributions from a broad range of ecolinguistic topics, that focus, for example, on the following topics:

For a list of possible topics, see also those in Fill and Mühlhäusler (2001).

The purposes of this Special Issue are to contribute to the ongoing elaboration of ecolinguistic research in these areas, to outline methodological approaches for ecolinguistic research, to carry forward the themes of past Ecolinguistic research and develop new and inspiring perspectives for future projects.

We request that, prior to submitting a manuscript, interested authors initially submit a proposed title and an abstract of 400–600 words summarizing their intended contribution. Please send it to the guest editors ( and [email protected]). Abstracts will be reviewed by the Guest Editors for the purposes of ensuring proper fit within the scope of the Special Issue. Full manuscripts will undergo double-blind peer-review.

Tentative Completion Schedule

Abstract Submission Deadline 1 November 2023
Notification of Abstract Acceptance 1 December 2023
Full Manuscript Deadline 1 April 2024

References

Alexander, Richard. 2008. “How the Anti-Green Movement and Its ‘Friends’ Use Language to Construct the World.” In Language, Signs, and Nature: Ecolinguistic Dimensions of Environmental Discourse ; Essays in Honour of Alwin Fill, edited by Martin Döring, Hermine Penz, and Wilhelm Trampe, 127–142. Stauffenburg Festschriften. Tübingen: Stauffenburg.

Alexander, Richard. 2002. “Everyone Is Talking about ‘Sustainable Development’. Can They All Mean the Same Thing? Computer Discourse Analysis of Ecological Texts.” In Colourful Green Ideas: Papers from the Conference “30 Years of Language and Ecology,” edited by A Fill, H Penz, and W Trampe, 239–254. Peter Lang.

———. 2013. Common Cause for Nature: Values and Frames in Conservation, edited by Blackmore, Elena, and Tim Holmes Machynlleth. Wales: Public Interest Research Centre.

Cachelin, Adrienne, Russell Norvell, and Ann Darling. 2010. “Language Fouls in Teaching Ecology: Why Traditional Metaphors Undermine Conservation Literacy.” Conservation Biology 24 (3): 669–674. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2010.01481.x.

Caimotto, M. Cristina. 2020. Discourses of Cycling, Road Users and Sustainability: An Ecolinguistic Investigation (Postdisciplinary Studies in Discourse). 1st ed. 2020. Palgrave Macmillan.

Döring, Martin, Hermine. Penz, and Wilhelm. Trampe. 2008. Language, Signs and Nature: Ecolinguistic Dimensions of Environmental Discourse : Essays in Honour of Alwin Fill. Tübingen: Stauffenburg Verlag.

Fill, Alwin, and Peter Mühlhäusler. 2001. The Ecolinguistics Reader: Language, Ecology, and Environment. London: Continuum.

Finke, Peter. 2014. “The Ecology of Science and Its Consequences for the Ecology of Language.” Language Sciences 41 (January): 71–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2013.08.008.

———. 2018. “Transdisciplinary Ecolinguistics.” In The Routledge Handbook of Ecolinguistics, edited by Alwin Fill and Hermine Penz, 1 edition, 406–419. London: Routledge.

Goatly, Andrew. 2001. “Green Grammar and Grammatical Metaphor, or Language and Myth of Power, or Metaphors We Die By.” In The Ecolinguistics Reader: Language, Ecology, and Environment, edited by Alwin Fill and Peter Mühlhäusler, 203–225. London: Continuum.

Goatly, ANDREW. 2002. “The Representation of Nature on the BBC World Service.” Text - Interdisciplinary Journal for the Study of Discourse 22 (1): 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1515/text.2002.003.

Huang, G. 2016. “Ecolinguistics in an International Context: An Interview with Arran Stibbe.” Language & Ecology, 1–10.

Lechevrel, Nadège. 2009. “The Intertwined Histories of Ecolinguistics and Ecological Approaches of Language(s) : Historical and Theoretical Aspects of a Research Paradigm.” In Symposium on Ecolinguistics: The Ecology of Science. University of Southern Denmark.

Naess, A. 1975. “The Shallow and the Long Range, Deep Ecology Movement.” In The Deep Ecology Movement: An Introductory Anthology, edited by A Drengson and Y Inoue, 3–10. North Atlantic Books.

Stibbe, Arran. 2015. Ecolinguistics: Language, Ecology and the Stories We Live By. 1st ed. London: Routledge.

———. 2017. “Positive Discourse Analysis: Re-Thinking Human Ecological Relationships.” In The Routledge Handbook of Ecolinguistics, edited by Alwin Fill and Hermine Penz, 165–78. London: Routledge.

———. 2019. “Education for Sustainability and the Search for New Stories to Live By.” In Prioritizing Sustainability Education: A Comprehensive Approach, edited by Joan Armon, Stephen Scoffham, and Chara Armon, 1 edition, 233–243. London ; New York: Routledge.

Xue, Yahong, and Qianqiu Xu. 2021. “An Ecological Discourse Analysis of News Coverage of COVID-19 in China in The Times and The New York Times.” Journal of World Languages 7 (1): 80–103. https://doi.org/10.1515/jwl-2021-0005.

Zhou, Wenjuan. 2022. “Ecolinguistics: A Half-Century Overview.” Journal of World Languages 7 (3): 461–486. https://doi.org/10.1515/jwl-2021-0022.

Dr. Douglas Mark Ponton
Dr. Lucia Abbamonte
Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a double-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Languages is an international peer-reviewed open access monthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 1400 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • ecolinguistics
  • the environment
  • sustainability
  • green visions
  • positive discourse analysis
  • ecocriticism

Published Papers (2 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

14 pages, 371 KiB  
Article
Made in Languaging; Ecolinguistic Expertise
by Stephen J. Cowley
Languages 2024, 9(7), 252; https://doi.org/10.3390/languages9070252 - 17 Jul 2024
Viewed by 269
Abstract
Made in languaging aims to help ecolinguists with recrafting ideation and human practices. Inspired by Alexander and Stibbe, I turn to how ecolinguistic expertise can favour life-sustaining relations. In approaching normative goals, I start with how knowledge is made, self-sustains and is disseminated. [...] Read more.
Made in languaging aims to help ecolinguists with recrafting ideation and human practices. Inspired by Alexander and Stibbe, I turn to how ecolinguistic expertise can favour life-sustaining relations. In approaching normative goals, I start with how knowledge is made, self-sustains and is disseminated. Ecolinguistic analysis of languages, discourse and narratives can thus be enriched by tracing how practices inform languaging. In turning to epistemic agency, I emphasise the following: (1) building corpora popularia, organised bodies, in order to enhance life-sustaining relations; (2) illuminating life from the inside; and (3) developing bioecological awareness. I contend that, while all living beings use coordinative activities to bring forth what appears to us, humans also use wording types and practices. As we use the already known, languaging enables subjecthood, a person’s little worlds, and a group’s common realities. Hence, what appears as (and to) experience is made in languaging. When linked to normative concerns, the resulting middle worlds also offer means of putting knowledge to work. As in social epistemology, one might regard ‘wealth and well-being’ as a marker of public good. Yet, critical work shows, appeal to these values is anthropomorphic. In order to encompass nonhumans and the biogenic, one can reject market orientatation by tracing languaging, and knowing, back to living. In showing benefits of so doing, I contrast two evolving wording types. The case of growthism, I suggest, attests to praxis and contrasts starkly with the ideational value of life-sustaining relations. Yet, in both cases, languaging meshes practices, happenings and the effects of action. The move shows how one can challenge the hypostatisation of ideology by pursuing how epistemic agency can contribute to the future of evolution. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Current Trends in Ecolinguistics)
17 pages, 373 KiB  
Article
Mobility Justice: An Ecolinguistic Perspective
by Maria Cristina Caimotto
Languages 2024, 9(7), 242; https://doi.org/10.3390/languages9070242 - 8 Jul 2024
Viewed by 413
Abstract
The climate crisis, migration and urbanization may appear as three separate crises, but under Sheller’s paradigm of Mobility Justice, they become part of a coherent whole that should be tackled as a single, complex and interconnected predicament. This paper observes rhetorical strategies employed [...] Read more.
The climate crisis, migration and urbanization may appear as three separate crises, but under Sheller’s paradigm of Mobility Justice, they become part of a coherent whole that should be tackled as a single, complex and interconnected predicament. This paper observes rhetorical strategies employed in texts about the climate crisis, about cycling advocacy and about the “climate lockdown” conspiracy theory, which developed in Oxford, UK, in 2023. The metaphors, deictic pronouns and identity categories used are the main discourse features analysed through a qualitative approach, showing how mobility-related issues are often discussed through spatial metaphors, while deictic pronouns play a central role in the creation of identities. The findings are employed to contribute to the beneficial reframing of mobility-related discourses, whether global or local, and to react to climate inaction. The overall aim of this approach is to reveal the links between discourses about the climate crisis on a global scale and those on a local, urban scale concerning urban mobility policies. The prism through which both global and local discourses are observed is that of space and access to mobility. The aim of this investigation is to identify new patterns of language that can help us finding “new stories to live by”. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Current Trends in Ecolinguistics)
Back to TopTop