Special Issue "Urban Green and Blue Infrastructure in the View of Global Warming"

A special issue of Land (ISSN 2073-445X). This special issue belongs to the section "Land–Climate Interactions".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: 25 February 2022.

Special Issue Editors

Prof. Dr. Manfred Koehler
E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Landscape Architecture, University of Applied Sciences, Brodaer Str. 2, 17033 Neubrandenburg, Germany
Interests: green infrastructure; green roofs; living walls; biodiversity; urban ecology
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals
Dr. Daniel Kaiser
E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Lehr- und Versuchsanstalt für Gartenbau und Arboristik e.V., 14979 Großbeeren, Germany
Interests: green roofs; green walls; urban greenery; rainwater management; climate adaptation; irrigated green roofs

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

Global warming and urban heat islands are key challenges today. The typical urban heat island is characterized by paved areas and a lack of vegetation. In recent decades, a number of research studies have guided the way to bring evaporative urban surfaces back into cities. Solutions can be found in “blue–green infrastructure”, which refers to infrastructure that incorporates vegetation on the surfaces of buildings and within the surrounding cityscape. For example, green roofs, vertical green systems, and rain gardens are related instruments that retain rainwater, clean grey water, and re-use this water before it finally infiltrates into the ground or is sent into the sewer system.

Evapotranspiration has massive cooling capacity without producing waste heat. This ecological benefit can also be an economic success in cities by reducing the need for investment in typical centralized grey infrastructure. In addition, blue–green infrastructure can transform the cityscape to create green and livable cities with higher biodiversity.

This cross-disciplinary initiative requires the cooperation of urban planners in combination with civil engineers, plant science specialists, and others. From research to administrative action, this is the path to achieve cooler and more sustainable cities. You are invited to contribute to this thematic publication to present current knowledge from your research. Evaluations of city case studies or administrative programs are also welcome.

Prof. Dr. Manfred Koehler
Dr. Daniel Kaiser
Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All papers will be peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Land is an international peer-reviewed open access monthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2000 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • blue–green infrastructure
  • rain garden
  • green roofs
  • rain water management
  • water cycle
  • evapotranspiration
  • biodiversity
  • sustainable urban water concepts
  • zero run-off properties
  • ecosystem services

Published Papers (6 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

Article
Green May Be Nice, but Infrastructure Is Necessary
Land 2022, 11(1), 89; https://doi.org/10.3390/land11010089 - 06 Jan 2022
Viewed by 227
Abstract
Green infrastructure is presented as a novel and innovative approach in the current environmental planning discourse, but how new is it really? An historical overview of planning ideas in both the urban and the rural contexts indicates that the concept, if not the [...] Read more.
Green infrastructure is presented as a novel and innovative approach in the current environmental planning discourse, but how new is it really? An historical overview of planning ideas in both the urban and the rural contexts indicates that the concept, if not the term, “green infrastructure” has a very long and distinguished pedigree in the field of landscape and open space planning. To determine how far the concept is indeed new, definitions of green infrastructure from the literature are examined. While “green” has long been loosely used as a synonym for natural features and vegetation in the planning context, “infrastructure” is the part of the term which is really novel. Infrastructure is otherwise understood as being either “technical” or “social”, and the common features of these otherwise very different forms are considered in order to gain a better understanding of how they might also relate to a new interpretation of green infrastructure. A number of international case studies of different “green infrastructure” projects are then presented, again to better understand their common features and potential relationship to other infrastructure types. Finally, the necessity to consider green and blue areas together and to take them as seriously as other forms of infrastructure is emphasized. The developing climate and biodiversity crises underline the urgency of implementing a flexible and multifunctional green-blue infrastructure system. This must be carefully integrated into the existing fabric of both urban and rural landscapes and will require an appropriately resourced administration and management system, reflecting its beneficial impacts. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Urban Green and Blue Infrastructure in the View of Global Warming)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Article
Green Urban (RE) Generation: A Research and Practice Methodology to Better Implement Green Urban Infrastructure Solutions
Land 2021, 10(12), 1376; https://doi.org/10.3390/land10121376 - 12 Dec 2021
Viewed by 420
Abstract
Green Urban Infrastructure Solutions (GUIS) are becoming more and more popular globally. Recent research reveals the environmental benefits derived from GUIS as well as their contribution to climate change adaptation. However, the urgent need for GUIS in order to meet the Paris Agreement, [...] Read more.
Green Urban Infrastructure Solutions (GUIS) are becoming more and more popular globally. Recent research reveals the environmental benefits derived from GUIS as well as their contribution to climate change adaptation. However, the urgent need for GUIS in order to meet the Paris Agreement, has not translated into an easy implementation thereof. This paper proposes a circular design methodology (CDM) where the combination of research and practice contributes to minimize both current skepticism and barriers when implementing GUIS. It includes a community engagement process to better understand their sensitivity and build consensus on GUIS. Additionally, GUIS are implemented, in a series of pilot projects and specific research is applied to comprehend the environmental benefits derived from these GUIS. The paper argues that GUIS represent a significant opportunity to respond to climate change risks as well as to achieve other urban benefits; however, in order to overcome existing barriers and skepticism, the proposed CDM reaches for more consensual urban solutions and drives uptake and implementation of GUIS, contributing to move from pilot project to common practice. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Urban Green and Blue Infrastructure in the View of Global Warming)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Article
Evapotranspiration Measurements and Assessment of Driving Factors: A Comparison of Different Green Roof Systems during Summer in Germany
Land 2021, 10(12), 1334; https://doi.org/10.3390/land10121334 - 03 Dec 2021
Viewed by 487
Abstract
Green roofs have proven to be a space-saving solution to mitigate peak temperatures and control floods in urban areas through evaporative cooling and storm water retention. To encourage a sustainable city design with large-scale green infrastructure networks, a better differentiation between the diverse [...] Read more.
Green roofs have proven to be a space-saving solution to mitigate peak temperatures and control floods in urban areas through evaporative cooling and storm water retention. To encourage a sustainable city design with large-scale green infrastructure networks, a better differentiation between the diverse existing green roof systems is needed. The aim of this study is to demonstrate differences among green roof systems based on comprehensive microclimatic measurements on four small experimental roofs and to assess differences in evapotranspiration with a partial least square regression. The results show that short-wave solar radiation, relative humidity and water availability are the most important drivers of evapotranspiration. The roof system with permanent water storage maintained significantly higher substrate moisture compared to the other roofs and produced peak evapotranspiration rates of 4.88 mm d−1. The highest total evapo-transpiration of 526 mm from April to September was recorded for the roof system with the thickest substrate layer and grass vegetation. In summer, the shallowest roof showed the highest substrate temperature and air temperature at vegetation level. These findings highlight the importance of specifying the characteristics of the various green roofs in order to turn them into useful planning tools for the design of climate-change-resilient cities. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Urban Green and Blue Infrastructure in the View of Global Warming)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Article
Rooting Volume Impacts Growth, Coverage and Thermal Tolerance of Green Façade Climbing Plants
Land 2021, 10(12), 1281; https://doi.org/10.3390/land10121281 - 23 Nov 2021
Viewed by 270
Abstract
Green façades can provide cooling benefits through the shading of walls, evapotranspiration, and insulation. These benefits depend on good plant coverage and tolerance of heat stress. This requires sufficient rooting volume for plant growth and an adequate supply of moisture. On high-rise buildings, [...] Read more.
Green façades can provide cooling benefits through the shading of walls, evapotranspiration, and insulation. These benefits depend on good plant coverage and tolerance of heat stress. This requires sufficient rooting volume for plant growth and an adequate supply of moisture. On high-rise buildings, plants can be constrained by small rooting volumes due to engineering weight limits and cost. We assessed effects of rooting volume (21, 42, and 63 L) on the growth and coverage of Akebia quinata and Pandorea pandorana and leaf stress (chlorophyll fluorescence) in response to increasing air temperatures. We showed that 42 and 63 L rooting volumes significantly increased early plant growth and the percentage wall coverage for both species. Specific leaf area was significantly greater when grown in 63 L compared with 21 L. Shoot/root ratio did not change with rooting volumes. Regardless of rooting volume, higher air temperatures on west-facing aspects led to afternoon leaf stress. In practice, for each cubic meter of rooting volume, 21 m2 (P. pandorana) and 10 m2 (A. quinata) canopy coverage can be expected within six months. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Urban Green and Blue Infrastructure in the View of Global Warming)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Article
Alternative Engineered Soils and Seed Mixes Used for Seepage Troughs
Land 2021, 10(11), 1152; https://doi.org/10.3390/land10111152 - 29 Oct 2021
Viewed by 420
Abstract
Green Infrastructure measures such as seepage troughs are an integral part of sustainable urban rainwater management. In Austria, seepage troughs are currently almost exclusively produced with a 30 cm thick active soil filter passage made of topsoil. A standard seed mix is used [...] Read more.
Green Infrastructure measures such as seepage troughs are an integral part of sustainable urban rainwater management. In Austria, seepage troughs are currently almost exclusively produced with a 30 cm thick active soil filter passage made of topsoil. A standard seed mix is used as vegetation, which usually consists of only three different turfgrass species. During a three-year trial, engineered soils with improved properties (increased water storage capacity, infiltration rate and pore volume) were tested for their suitability as seepage troughs compared to topsoil. In addition to the standard turf seed mix, a flowering turf seed mix (34 species) and flowering meadow seed mix (53 species) were applied. The engineered and reference soils were analyzed for infiltration rate, vitality, cover ratio and inflorescence. The results were further assessed with the evaluation chart showing quantitatively the suitability of the tested soils for rainwater management. The investigations showed that engineered soils in combination with flowering meadow seed mix lead to the best results. Therefore, this type of vegetation for seepage troughs is recommended for future applications. The reference alternatives cannot be recommended. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Urban Green and Blue Infrastructure in the View of Global Warming)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Article
Equation for Calculating Evapotranspiration of Technical Soils for Urban Planting
Land 2021, 10(6), 622; https://doi.org/10.3390/land10060622 - 10 Jun 2021
Viewed by 681
Abstract
Equations for calculating evapotranspiration in technical soils show great differences regarding their results. Causes are the different climatic conditions and vegetation specifics during their development. Every equation of evapotranspiration only delivers 100% correct results if it is used under the same climatic condition [...] Read more.
Equations for calculating evapotranspiration in technical soils show great differences regarding their results. Causes are the different climatic conditions and vegetation specifics during their development. Every equation of evapotranspiration only delivers 100% correct results if it is used under the same climatic condition as it was developed in. To determine the evapotranspiration, the loss of weight of different technical soils and plants was measured in a test series on load cells in a climate chamber. The result of these test series is the development of an easy-to-use equation. An equation for calculating evapotranspiration at any temperature is possible while using a polynomial correlation. To determine the evapotranspiration rate (in mm/m² per 24 h), only temperature, vegetation type, and technical soil have to be defined to obtain an output of evapotranspiration in mm/day. Using the well-known equation by Makkink, evapotranspiration in technical soils is 0.12 mm/day, whereas the newly developed equation calculates (1) 2.59–5.58 mm/day for the variant with no vegetation, (2) 3.15–4.00 mm/day for Sedum floriferum, (3) 4.40–4.55 mm/day for Geranium x cantabrigiense. The application of this equation will help to determine the evapotranspiration in chosen technical soils (used in the sector of rainwater management) with or without vegetation. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Urban Green and Blue Infrastructure in the View of Global Warming)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop