Feature Papers for the ‘Land Socio-Economic and Political Issues’ Section: Achieving the Sustainable Development Goals—2nd Edition

A special issue of Land (ISSN 2073-445X). This special issue belongs to the section "Land Socio-Economic and Political Issues".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: 31 December 2025 | Viewed by 4294

Special Issue Editor


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Economics and Rural Development, Gembloux Agro-Bio Tech, University of Liège, 5030 Gembloux, Belgium
Interests: land governance; land use policy; land use planning; political economy; human geography; agricultural economics; food security; decision support systems; sustainability
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

Land use is shaped by a complex nexus of socio-economic and political factors which significantly influence Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). Economic forces such as market demand, urbanization, and resource extraction play key roles in shaping land use patterns, often leading to adverse environmental and societal impacts. In addition, political dynamics such as land tenure systems, property rights, and governance structures significantly influence land access and decision-making processes, thereby shaping land use outcomes at local, regional, and global scales. Moreover, socio-cultural elements, including cultural practices, demographics, and migration patterns, play an important role in determining the direction of land use. These factors influence a range of issues, from food security and poverty reduction to environmental sustainability and cultural heritage preservation. Understanding and addressing these sociocultural dynamics are essential for promoting resilient and inclusive land use policies and practices. Fostering sustainable and equitable land use requires a holistic, multi-stakeholder approach that engages governments, businesses, communities, and civil society organizations. Effective land use planning and management necessitate cross-sectoral collaboration, transparent decision-making processes, policy coherence, and meaningful dialogue among diverse stakeholders. By integrating diverse perspectives and expertise, policymakers can develop strategies that prioritize environmental conservation, social equity, and economic development, ensuring the long-term health and resilience of our land and communities.

Achieving SDGs is inextricably linked to how we manage and use land. This nexus is most evident in the interdependencies among several key SDGs that are directly influenced by land use dynamics. For instance, SDG 2, which advocates for "Zero Hunger", is closely connected to agronomic practices and the sustainable use of arable land. The efficient and responsible use of land resources is essential for boosting agricultural productivity, ensuring food security, and providing adequate nutrition for the growing world population. This requires innovations in sustainable farming, improved land management techniques, and the preservation of soil fertility to support food systems that are resilient to climate shocks and other external pressures. At the same time, SDG 15, "Life on Land", highlights the need to preserve and restore terrestrial ecosystems, such as forests, wetlands, and grasslands, to maintain the biodiversity and ecosystem services they provide. These services are critical for human survival and include water purification, flood protection, carbon sequestration, and the preservation of flora and fauna. Sustainable land use strategies are crucial to prevent habitat destruction, land degradation, and loss of biodiversity, which are challenges that this goal seeks to address. SDG 10, "Reduced Inequalities", incorporates the principle of equity, which extends to land use by supporting fair and just access to land resources. This includes addressing historical inequities in land distribution, ensuring land rights for marginalized communities, and implementing policies that allow for equitable sharing of the benefits derived from land use. Furthermore, SDG 13, "Climate Action", underscores the urgency of adopting sustainable land use practices to mitigate climate change. Land use decisions have a profound impact on greenhouse gas emissions, carbon sequestration, and the resilience of natural and human systems to climate-induced changes. Practices such as deforestation, land conversion, and unsustainable agriculture exacerbate climate change, while sustainable practices can mitigate its effects and contribute to the adaptation capacities of communities. The integration of these SDGs into land use policies requires a careful understanding of the trade-offs and synergies between environmental conservation, social equity, and economic development. It is imperative for policymakers to create a framework that balances these sometimes-competing objectives, enabling human prosperity while safeguarding the planet. Overall, this Special Issue (SI) seeks to catalyze interdisciplinary collaboration, uniting diverse academic disciplines ranging from environmental science, agronomy, social sciences, and economics, to urban planning and law to address the multifaceted challenges of achieving the SDGs in the context of sustainable land use. By promoting a multidisciplinary exchange of knowledge and research, the goal is to cultivate a comprehensive and inclusive understanding of land-related issues. Such an integrative approach is vital for formulating holistic strategies, policies, and practices that can navigate the complex interplay between human activities and the natural environment. Through this collaborative academic and policy-oriented endeavor, we can aspire to meet the ambitious targets of the SDGs and ensure a sustainable future for all.

We invite submissions from a diversity of disciplinary backgrounds including environmental science, economics, political economy, socio-economic, development economics, sociology, and political science. We particularly seek submissions that demonstrate a high degree of methodological rigor in their examination and analysis of land issues, and that contribute to innovative approaches for achieving the SDGs. We welcome interdisciplinary work that synthesizes multiple perspectives, methods, and data sources to provide novel insights into land issues and their relation to the SDGs.

Prof. Dr. Hossein Azadi
Guest Editor

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Land is an international peer-reviewed open access monthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2600 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • sustainable land management
  • socio-economic implications of land use
  • political dimensions of land governance
  • land tenure systems
  • land rights and access
  • equitable land distribution
  • rural development and land policies
  • land-based livelihoods
  • land use planning
  • urbanization and land use
  • land degradation and restoration
  • gender and land ownership
  • climate change adaptation and land resilience
  • ecosystem services and land management
  • land conflicts and dispute resolution
  • land-based investments and governance
  • monitoring and evaluation of land-related SDGs
  • land administration
  • zero hunger (SDG 2)
  • life on land (SDG 15)
  • reduced inequalities (SDG 10)
  • climate action (SDG 13)

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

  • Ease of navigation: Grouping papers by topic helps scholars navigate broad scope journals more efficiently.
  • Greater discoverability: Special Issues support the reach and impact of scientific research. Articles in Special Issues are more discoverable and cited more frequently.
  • Expansion of research network: Special Issues facilitate connections among authors, fostering scientific collaborations.
  • External promotion: Articles in Special Issues are often promoted through the journal's social media, increasing their visibility.
  • Reprint: MDPI Books provides the opportunity to republish successful Special Issues in book format, both online and in print.

Further information on MDPI's Special Issue policies can be found here.

Related Special Issue

Published Papers (5 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

30 pages, 1957 KB  
Article
Impact of Political Economy on Land Administration Reform
by Anthony Francis Burns, Abbas Rajabifard and Davood Shojaei
Land 2025, 14(9), 1888; https://doi.org/10.3390/land14091888 - 15 Sep 2025
Viewed by 365
Abstract
Population growth, urbanization and climate change are all factors that have made it increasingly difficult for governments to manage, allocate and permit the development and use of the finite land resource that is available in any society. Land administration plays a crucial role [...] Read more.
Population growth, urbanization and climate change are all factors that have made it increasingly difficult for governments to manage, allocate and permit the development and use of the finite land resource that is available in any society. Land administration plays a crucial role in supporting governments in these efforts. The World Bank and other donors have provided financial backing to help governments implement land administration reforms. While many of these reform projects focus on finance and technology, some succeed, while others fail to create lasting, meaningful change. The reasons for this usually do not relate to problems with finance or technology but are often due to political economy factors. Approaches to consider political economy are reviewed. The usefulness and viability of using political economy analysis in the design of land administration reform is confirmed in a policy Delphi survey. An innovative framework to systematically consider the use of political economy analysis in the design of land administration reform is developed and validated. This research addresses a significant gap, as there has been limited exploration of the political economy of land administration. The findings will be valuable for governments, development partners, and specialists involved in designing and implementing large-scale land administration reform initiatives. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

23 pages, 4556 KB  
Article
Structural, Social, and Ecological Dimensions of Female Labor Force Participation: A Bayesian Analysis Across National Contexts
by Bediha Sahin
Land 2025, 14(9), 1793; https://doi.org/10.3390/land14091793 - 3 Sep 2025
Viewed by 643
Abstract
Although there are still significant inequalities, women’s labor force participation has increased in many parts of the world. These disparities are linked to socio-economic, territorial, and institutional conditions, such as access to land, quality of infrastructure, and the availability of decent work in [...] Read more.
Although there are still significant inequalities, women’s labor force participation has increased in many parts of the world. These disparities are linked to socio-economic, territorial, and institutional conditions, such as access to land, quality of infrastructure, and the availability of decent work in both urban and rural areas. To understand how these socio-economic and spatial factors interact with national economic and policy frameworks is essential for analyzing gender participation in work. In this study, we examine the structural, territorial, and socio-economic factors shaping female labor force participation in 49 countries between 2013 and 2022, covering Europe, Asia, Latin America, and Africa. We investigate the interaction between macroeconomic conditions, public investment in education, and spatial inequalities. In addition, we focus on how these factors work together within different institutional settings. The analysis also considers territorial aspects such as urban–rural differences, regional development issues, and land-related livelihoods. The data were collected from the World Bank’s World Development Indicators to build a balanced panel. We implemented a Bayesian hierarchical panel regression model to understand how economic, institutional, and spatial factors jointly influence women’s participation in the labor force across different national and regional contexts. For model specification, we used standardized predictors and country-level intercepts to allow the model to account for institutional differences. The results indicate that national income levels and female unemployment rates are the most important factors affecting participation. On the other hand, tertiary enrollment and public education spending have weaker or mixed effects. Notably, although more women now complete higher education, many, especially in non-OECD countries, still face barriers to entering formal employment. Furthermore, in many developing countries, women still encounter restricted access to formal and secure jobs, particularly in rural and less developed areas. These findings show that economic growth is not the only factor needed to achieve gender equality in the labor market. Sustainable progress requires plans that bring together labor reforms, better education, care services, and fair growth in all regions. It is also important to fix problems with land, close the gap between cities and villages, and address environmental challenges. By linking labor markets, education, and land-linked spatial constraints, the study informs SDGs 5 (Gender Equality), 8 (Decent Work and Economic Growth), and 10 (Reduced Inequalities). Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

21 pages, 1767 KB  
Article
Land Use Practices: Sustainability Impacts on Smallholder Farmers
by Ali Sher, Saman Mazhar, Iman Islami, Yenny Katherine Parra Acosta, Ramona Balc, Hossein Azadi and Hongping Yuan
Land 2025, 14(8), 1632; https://doi.org/10.3390/land14081632 - 13 Aug 2025
Viewed by 546
Abstract
This study investigates the drivers of individual and joint adoption of sustainable land use (SLU) practices—specifically crop choice and soil and water conservation—and their impact on farm performance (crop revenue) and production risk (crop yield skewness). Using a farm-level dataset of 504 households [...] Read more.
This study investigates the drivers of individual and joint adoption of sustainable land use (SLU) practices—specifically crop choice and soil and water conservation—and their impact on farm performance (crop revenue) and production risk (crop yield skewness). Using a farm-level dataset of 504 households across three agro-ecological zones in Punjab, Pakistan, we address selectivity bias through the newly developed multinomial endogenous switching regression (MESR) model. Additionally, we assess land use sustainability across ecological, social, and economic dimensions using a comprehensive non-parametric approach. Our findings identify key determinants of SLU adoption, including farmer education, access to advisory services, FBO membership, hired labor, climate information, farm size, and perceptions of drought and heatwaves. We demonstrate that joint adoption of SLU practices maximizes crop revenue and reduces production risk, lowering the likelihood of crop failure. The study further suggests complementarity between these SLU practices in enhancing crop revenue. Moreover, joint adopters of SLU practices significantly outperform non-adopters in ecological, social, and economic sustainability dimensions. We recommend improving access to public sector farm advisory services and climate information to enable farmers to make well-informed decisions based on reliable data. Implementing these measures can support the transition toward sustainable land management, helping to mitigate risks like crop failure and declining revenues, which threaten farm income. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

25 pages, 5547 KB  
Article
Urban Expansion and Landscape Transformation in Năvodari, Romania: An Integrated Geospatial and Socio-Economic Perspective
by Cristina-Elena Mihalache and Monica Dumitrașcu
Land 2025, 14(7), 1496; https://doi.org/10.3390/land14071496 - 19 Jul 2025
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 851
Abstract
Urban growth often surpasses the actual needs of the population, leading to inefficient land use and long-term environmental challenges. This study provides an integrated perspective on urban landscape transformation by linking socio-demographic dynamics with ecological consequences, notably vegetation loss and increased impervious surfaces. [...] Read more.
Urban growth often surpasses the actual needs of the population, leading to inefficient land use and long-term environmental challenges. This study provides an integrated perspective on urban landscape transformation by linking socio-demographic dynamics with ecological consequences, notably vegetation loss and increased impervious surfaces. The study area is Năvodari Administrative-Territorial Unit (ATU), a coastal tourist city located along the Black Sea in Romania. By integrating geospatial datasets such as Urban Atlas and Corine Land Cover with population- and construction-related statistics, the analysis reveals a disproportionate increase in urbanized land compared to population growth. Time-series analyses based on the Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI) and Normalized Difference Built-up Index (NDBI) from 1990 to 2022 highlight significant ecological degradation, including vegetation loss and increased built-up density. The findings suggest that real estate investment and tourism-driven development play a more substantial role than demographic dynamics in shaping land use change. Understanding urban expansion as a coupled social–ecological process is essential for promoting sustainable planning and enhancing environmental resilience. While this study is focused on the coastal city of Năvodari, its insights are relevant to a broader international context, particularly for rapidly developing tourist destinations facing similar urban and ecological pressures. The findings support efforts toward more inclusive, balanced, and environmentally responsible urban development, aligning with the core principles of Sustainable Development Goal 11, particularly Target 11.3, which emphasizes sustainable urbanization and efficient land use. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

24 pages, 1707 KB  
Article
Rubber Plantation Land Grabs and Agrarian Change: A Political Economy Analysis of Livelihood Pathways of Ethnic Minority Groups in Northwest Vietnam
by Luu Van Duy, Le Thi Thu Huong, Hiroshi Isoda, Yuichiro Amekawa, Le Thi Thanh Loan and Do Kim Chung
Land 2025, 14(6), 1201; https://doi.org/10.3390/land14061201 - 4 Jun 2025
Viewed by 1124
Abstract
This paper critically examines the consequences of land grabs for livelihoods and agrarian change, based on a case study of rubber plantations in ethnic minorities in the uplands in Northwest Vietnam. Building upon Scoones’ agrarian political economy of livelihood framework, an integrated conceptual [...] Read more.
This paper critically examines the consequences of land grabs for livelihoods and agrarian change, based on a case study of rubber plantations in ethnic minorities in the uplands in Northwest Vietnam. Building upon Scoones’ agrarian political economy of livelihood framework, an integrated conceptual framework of a ‘livelihood pathway’ is developed to analyze the impact of rubber plantation land grabs on livelihoods and the agrarian political economy. Drawing on qualitative analysis and survey data from 205 households across six villages inhabited by Thai, Hmong, and Kho Mu communities, this study finds that rubber plantation land grabs have led to differentiated livelihood strategies—ranging from subsistence farming and wage labor to commercial agriculture—shaped by each group’s socioeconomic status, political connections, and access to resources. Consequently, the land grabbing undertaken by a domestic state-owned enterprise has caused the emergence of a set of distinctive livelihood pathways within a complex web of intersections across class and ethnicity in the upland area. This study concludes by arguing that an integrated conceptual framework of a ‘livelihood pathway’ offers a useful tool for analyzing the long-term socio-political consequences of land grabbing in similar contexts across developing countries and beyond. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop