ijerph-logo

Journal Browser

Journal Browser

Exploring Quality of Life in Nursing and Patient Care

A special issue of International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health (ISSN 1660-4601). This special issue belongs to the section "Health Care Sciences".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: 30 September 2026 | Viewed by 1282

Special Issue Editor


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Faculty of Dental Medicine and Health Osijek, Josip Juraj Strossmayer University of Osijek, 31000 Osijek, Croatia
Interests: quality of life; nursing; clinical decision-making; evidence-based nursing; education; pain

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

Quality of life refers to an individual's ability to function normally in daily activities and feel satisfaction with their life. It is assessed at a given moment and can be defined as the level of enjoyment in available life opportunities. Numerous factors influence quality of life, including physical, mental, and spiritual health, interpersonal relationships, work environment, social status, sense of security, freedom and autonomy in decision making, sense of belonging, and physical surroundings.

In healthcare, the goal of treatment and patient care is to improve patients’ quality of life in all the above aspects. However, the level of improvement may vary depending on the illness and the patient's individual circumstances. Quality of life is not only affected by diseases but also by the way nurses perform their work. To provide high-quality care, nurses must also take care of their own health and quality of life. As an extremely demanding job, it can cause biological, physiological, and psychological changes that impact not only the well-being of nurses but also patient safety and quality of life. In this context, this Special Issue of IJERPH aims to share research examining the quality of life of patients and nurses, either independently or in relation to one another. In this Special Issue, original research articles and reviews are welcome, as well as descriptions of the development and/or validation of quality of life measurement instruments.

Dr. Nikolina Farčić
Guest Editor

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 250 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for assessment.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health is an international peer-reviewed open access monthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2500 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • quality of life
  • nurses
  • nursing
  • patients
  • education
  • health
  • pain

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

  • Ease of navigation: Grouping papers by topic helps scholars navigate broad scope journals more efficiently.
  • Greater discoverability: Special Issues support the reach and impact of scientific research. Articles in Special Issues are more discoverable and cited more frequently.
  • Expansion of research network: Special Issues facilitate connections among authors, fostering scientific collaborations.
  • External promotion: Articles in Special Issues are often promoted through the journal's social media, increasing their visibility.
  • Reprint: MDPI Books provides the opportunity to republish successful Special Issues in book format, both online and in print.

Further information on MDPI's Special Issue policies can be found here.

Published Papers (2 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

Jump to: Other

15 pages, 305 KB  
Article
Assessment of Quality of Life in the Early Postoperative Period in Patients with Lung Cancer
by Stana Pačarić, Tajana Turk, Ivan Erić, Marko Babić, Suzana Luketić, Nika Srb, Andrea Milostić Srb, Anamarija Petek Erić and Mario Duvnjak
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2025, 22(12), 1810; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph22121810 - 30 Nov 2025
Viewed by 134
Abstract
Measuring quality of life (QoL) in patients with early-stage lung cancer is an important aspect of treatment success. This study assessed QoL in the early postoperative period in patients with lung cancer, with regard to the type of cancer. This single-center study was [...] Read more.
Measuring quality of life (QoL) in patients with early-stage lung cancer is an important aspect of treatment success. This study assessed QoL in the early postoperative period in patients with lung cancer, with regard to the type of cancer. This single-center study was conducted on 64 patients who underwent surgery for non-small cell (NSCLC) and small cell (SCLC) lung cancer. Quality of life questionnaires (QLQs) of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) were used. The EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire assesses the quality of life of cancer patients, and the EORTC QLQ-LC13 questionnaire is a lung cancer module. In the group of patients with NSCLC, the general health status (p < 0.001), physical functioning (p = 0.004), emotional functioning (p = 0.005) and total functional scale (p = 0.01) were significantly better assessed, fatigue was less pronounced (p = 0.005), nausea/vomiting (p = 0.04), pain (p = 0.004), breathing difficulties were less pronounced (p = 0.03), loss of appetite was less pronounced (p = 0.005), and the symptom scale was significantly less pronounced (p = 0.002) compared to patients with SCLC. In the QLQ-LC13 symptom scale, SCLC patients had more cough (p = 0.02), dyspnea (p = 0.03), dysphagia (p = 0.005), peripheral neuropathy (p = 0.04), chest pain (p < 0.001), arm or shoulder pain (p < 0.001), and pain in other parts of the body (p = 0.005) compared to NSCLC patients. Patients with NSCLC evaluated the functioning scales better and had less pronounced symptoms on the symptom scale, while patients with SCLC evaluated the treatment symptoms worse on the symptom scale, especially the symptom of pain, which had an impact on the quality of life of the patients. The results of this study could contribute to raising public awareness about the quality of life of lung cancer patients. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Exploring Quality of Life in Nursing and Patient Care)

Other

Jump to: Research

17 pages, 515 KB  
Systematic Review
Validated Tools for Assessing Anxiety and Depression in Nurses: A Systematic Review
by Gabriel Reyes Rodríguez, Leticia Cuellar-Pompa, Natalia Rodríguez Novo, Miguel López Martínez and José Ángel Rodríguez Gómez
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2025, 22(11), 1714; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph22111714 - 13 Nov 2025
Viewed by 680
Abstract
Background: Nurses experience substantial anxiety and depression; robust, validated instruments are needed. We aimed to identify tools used to assess these conditions in nurses. Methods: A systematic review was conducted in December 2024 and registered in OSF and PROSPERO. MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, and [...] Read more.
Background: Nurses experience substantial anxiety and depression; robust, validated instruments are needed. We aimed to identify tools used to assess these conditions in nurses. Methods: A systematic review was conducted in December 2024 and registered in OSF and PROSPERO. MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, and PsycINFO were searched for quantitative studies (2014–2024) in English/Spanish that included nurses only and used standardized measures. Two reviewers screened and extracted the data; quality was appraised with JBI checklists, narrative synthesis only. Results: Twenty-two studies (n = 10,710 nurses) met the criteria. Most were cross-sectional with non-probability sampling; the overall risk of bias was moderate in 19 studies and high in 3. The most frequently used instruments were PHQ-9, GAD-7, GHQ-28, and BDI; across versions, PHQ (PHQ-2/PHQ-9) predominated. Heterogeneity precluded meta-analysis. Discussion: The available tools support routine screening in nursing populations, but reliance on self-reports and scarce formal cross-cultural validation in practicing nurses limit inference and generalizability. Conclusions: Screening programs in nursing should pair brief self-report instruments with objective indicators and standardized protocols; future studies should prioritize contextualized validation and robust longitudinal designs. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Exploring Quality of Life in Nursing and Patient Care)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop