Innovations in Interprofessional Care and Training

A special issue of Healthcare (ISSN 2227-9032). This special issue belongs to the section "Health Informatics and Big Data".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (31 January 2025) | Viewed by 18079

Special Issue Editor


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Interprofessional Collaboration, School of Biomedical Informatics, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston (UTHealth), Houston, TX 77030, USA
Interests: interprofessional teams; organizational behavior in healthcare; clinical leadership; telehealth/tel
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

Interprofessional collaboration occurs when healthcare professionals from different backgrounds assemble to care for patients or train students to do so. With the onset of the global COVID-19 pandemic, there has been a disruption of many of these team-based approaches due to the implementation of virtual care or care having occurred in alternate settings. This Special Issue of Healthcare focuses on recent successes and/or failures in the implementation of patient-centered, interprofessional care; the effectiveness of the hybrid/virtual instruction of the healthcare workforce, the patient's satisfaction as a recipient of interprofessional care, and programmatic assessments or project plans for advancing the health of populations using novel combinations of health workers as part of an interdisciplinary team. We welcome and encourage research from interprofessional teams, including virtual care, digital innovations, e-Health, remote home monitoring, and/or provider combinations such as community health workers and licensed providers or community paramedicine programs. 

Dr. Tiffany Champagne-Langabeer
Guest Editor

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Healthcare is an international peer-reviewed open access semimonthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2700 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • patient-centered
  • interprofessional care
  • virtual environments
  • training the healthcare workforce
  • virtual care
  • digital innovations
  • e-health
  • community paramedicine
  • lay community outreach

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

  • Ease of navigation: Grouping papers by topic helps scholars navigate broad scope journals more efficiently.
  • Greater discoverability: Special Issues support the reach and impact of scientific research. Articles in Special Issues are more discoverable and cited more frequently.
  • Expansion of research network: Special Issues facilitate connections among authors, fostering scientific collaborations.
  • External promotion: Articles in Special Issues are often promoted through the journal's social media, increasing their visibility.
  • Reprint: MDPI Books provides the opportunity to republish successful Special Issues in book format, both online and in print.

Further information on MDPI's Special Issue policies can be found here.

Published Papers (10 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Editorial

Jump to: Research, Other

2 pages, 170 KiB  
Editorial
The Benefits and Challenges of Virtual Education for Interprofessional Teams in a Post-COVID Environment
by Tiffany Champagne-Langabeer
Healthcare 2022, 10(11), 2195; https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare10112195 - 2 Nov 2022
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 1447
Abstract
There have been a series of disruptions in the healthcare environment since 2019, starting with the global pandemic [...] Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Innovations in Interprofessional Care and Training)

Research

Jump to: Editorial, Other

16 pages, 511 KiB  
Article
A Digital-Health Program Based on Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment for the Management of Older People at Their Home: Final Recommendations from the MULTIPLAT_AGE Network Project
by Alberto Pilotto, Carolina Massone, Guido Iaccarino, Armando Genazzani, Carlo Trompetto, Gennarina Arabia, Wanda Morganti, Emanuele Seminerio, Maddalena Illario, Luigi Castello, Laura Mori, Loris Pignolo and Romina Custureri
Healthcare 2025, 13(10), 1105; https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare13101105 - 9 May 2025
Viewed by 201
Abstract
Background: The MULTIPLAT_AGE is a network project which developed a digital platform based on the Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment (CGA) for collecting data and identifying personalized healthcare programs for older people at home. In this article, the final recommendations of the MULTIPLAT_AGE Working Group [...] Read more.
Background: The MULTIPLAT_AGE is a network project which developed a digital platform based on the Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment (CGA) for collecting data and identifying personalized healthcare programs for older people at home. In this article, the final recommendations of the MULTIPLAT_AGE Working Group are reported. Methods: The MULTIPLAT_AGE project included five independent studies developed and carried out by five research centers according to two common principles previously shared by the researchers: (i) the multidimensional approach to older people through the CGA-based Multidimensional Prognostic Index (MPI); (ii) the use of a common web-based platform for collecting data to facilitate healthcare interventions of older people at their home according to the aging in place approach. At the end of the studies, a series of recommendations have been proposed by an expert panel including the principal investigators and discussed by all researchers involved in the MULTIPLAT_AGE project in formal meetings. After discussion, the recommendations have been approved with formal vote by all the researchers during the final meeting of the MULTIPLAT_AGE project. Results: The recommendations are addressed to healthcare providers, policy decision-makers, caregivers, and patients. In summary, the CGA-based interventions and technologies adopted in the MULTIPLAT_AGE project reduced length of hospital stay, improved multidimensional frailty, walking safety, physical and cognitive performances, and reduced fear of falling in older people across different clinical settings and suffering from different diseases. Conclusions: The final recommendations of the MULTIPLAT_AGE Working Group could be a useful instrument to facilitate the use of technologies along with CGA-based interventions to improve the management of older people at home. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Innovations in Interprofessional Care and Training)
Show Figures

Figure 1

11 pages, 519 KiB  
Article
Using Task-Evoked Pupillary Response to Predict Clinical Performance during a Simulation Training
by Elba Mauriz, Sandra Caloca-Amber and Ana M. Vázquez-Casares
Healthcare 2023, 11(4), 455; https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare11040455 - 4 Feb 2023
Cited by 3 | Viewed by 2045
Abstract
Training in healthcare skills can be affected by trainees’ workload when completing a task. Due to cognitive processing demands being negatively correlated to clinical performance, assessing mental workload through objective measures is crucial. This study aimed to investigate task-evoked changes in pupil size [...] Read more.
Training in healthcare skills can be affected by trainees’ workload when completing a task. Due to cognitive processing demands being negatively correlated to clinical performance, assessing mental workload through objective measures is crucial. This study aimed to investigate task-evoked changes in pupil size as reliable markers of mental workload and clinical performance. A sample of 49 nursing students participated in a cardiac arrest simulation-based practice. Measurements of cognitive demands (NASA-Task Load Index), physiological parameters (blood pressure, oxygen saturation, and heart rate), and pupil responses (minimum, maximum, and difference diameters) throughout revealed statistically significant differences according to performance scores. The analysis of a multiple regression model produced a statistically significant pattern between pupil diameter differences and heart rate, systolic blood pressure, workload, and performance (R2 = 0.280; F (6, 41) = 2.660; p < 0.028; d = 2.042). Findings suggest that pupil variations are promising markers to complement physiological metrics for predicting mental workload and clinical performance in medical practice. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Innovations in Interprofessional Care and Training)
Show Figures

Figure 1

9 pages, 241 KiB  
Article
Collaborative Interprofessional Health Science Student Led Realistic Mass Casualty Incident Simulation
by Deborah L. McCrea, Robert C. Coghlan, Tiffany Champagne-Langabeer and Stanley Cron
Healthcare 2023, 11(1), 40; https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare11010040 - 23 Dec 2022
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 2272
Abstract
In collaboration, a health science university and a fire department offered a mass casualty incident (MCI) simulation. The purpose of this study was to evaluate a cross-section of student health care providers to determine their working knowledge of an MCI. Students were given [...] Read more.
In collaboration, a health science university and a fire department offered a mass casualty incident (MCI) simulation. The purpose of this study was to evaluate a cross-section of student health care providers to determine their working knowledge of an MCI. Students were given a pretest using the Emergency Preparedness Information Questionnaire (EPIQ) and the Simple Triage and Rapid Transport (START) Quiz. The EPIQ instrument related to knowledge of triage, first aid, bio-agent detection, critical reporting, incident command, isolation/quarantine/decontamination, psychological issues, epidemiology, and communications. The START Quiz gave 10 scenarios. Didactic online content was given followed by the simulation a few weeks later. A posttest with the same instruments was given after the simulation. Participants were majority female (81.7%), aged between 25–34 (41.7%), and 61.7% (n = 74) had undergraduate or post-graduate degrees. The overall pretest mean was 2.92 and posttest mean was 3.64. The START Quiz found participants struggled to correctly assign triage levels. Students also experienced challenges correctly assigning patients to specific triage categories. Findings will assist educators to understand knowledge gaps, so revisions can be made to enhance learning in disaster management. Concentration in proper field triage is also a needed focus. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Innovations in Interprofessional Care and Training)
17 pages, 1800 KiB  
Article
Advancing Access to Healthcare through Telehealth: A Brownsville Community Assessment
by Edna Ely-Ledesma and Tiffany Champagne-Langabeer
Healthcare 2022, 10(12), 2509; https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare10122509 - 11 Dec 2022
Cited by 3 | Viewed by 3425
Abstract
(1) Background: This paper focuses on the development of a community assessment for telehealth using an interprofessional lens, which sits at the intersection of public health and urban planning using multistakeholder input. The paper analyzes the process of designing and implementing a telemedicine [...] Read more.
(1) Background: This paper focuses on the development of a community assessment for telehealth using an interprofessional lens, which sits at the intersection of public health and urban planning using multistakeholder input. The paper analyzes the process of designing and implementing a telemedicine plan for the City of Brownsville and its surrounding metros. (2) Methods: We employed an interprofessional approach to CBPR which assumed all stakeholders as equal partners alongside the researchers to uncover the most relevant and useful knowledge to inform the development of telehealth community assessment. (3) Results: Key findings include that: physicians do not have the technology, financial means, or staff to provide a comprehensive system for telemedicine; and due to language and literacy barriers, many patients are not able to use a web-based system of telemedicine. We also found that all stakeholders believe that telehealth is a convenient tool that has the capacity to increase patient access and care. (4) Conclusions: Ultimately, the use of an interprofessional community-based participatory research (CBPR) design allowed our team to bring together local knowledge with that of trained experts to advance the research efforts. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Innovations in Interprofessional Care and Training)
Show Figures

Figure 1

9 pages, 496 KiB  
Article
In-Person, Remote, or Hybrid Instruction? A Quality Improvement Assessment of a Six Week Interprofessional Education Pathway Program for Undergraduate Pre-Health Students
by Asia McCleary-Gaddy, Erica Tengyuan Yu and Robert D. Spears
Healthcare 2022, 10(12), 2399; https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare10122399 - 29 Nov 2022
Cited by 5 | Viewed by 2120
Abstract
There is an emphasis on increasing the diversity of healthcare providers with the goal of reducing health disparities among racial/ethnic minorities. To support this initiative, pathway programs were designed to provide educational and career support to students belonging to racial/ethnic minorities or those [...] Read more.
There is an emphasis on increasing the diversity of healthcare providers with the goal of reducing health disparities among racial/ethnic minorities. To support this initiative, pathway programs were designed to provide educational and career support to students belonging to racial/ethnic minorities or those who have challenges applying to or entering health professions. As a consequence of the COVID-19 pandemic, pathway programs have assumed various instructional delivery formats (e.g., face to face, virtual, hybrid) with little knowledge on the satisfaction of such methods. The current preliminary study examines whether in person, virtual, or hybrid learning is most effective for underrepresented pre-health undergraduate students who are engaged in a six-week interprofessional health pathway program. Quantitative and qualitative data was collected at one time point towards the end of the program when it was offered in person, virtually, and in hybrid format. Results revealed that the pre-health pathway program received highest satisfaction when presented in a hybrid format and least satisfaction when presented in virtual instruction. Qualitative data suggests that virtual instruction increases feelings of isolation and complicates educational information due to the limitations of virtual streaming. Implications for pathway design are discussed. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Innovations in Interprofessional Care and Training)
Show Figures

Figure 1

9 pages, 595 KiB  
Article
Unintended Consequences of a Transition to Synchronous, Virtual Simulations for Interprofessional Learners
by Tiffany Champagne-Langabeer, Samuel E. Neher, Marylou Cardenas-Turanzas and Jennifer L. Swails
Healthcare 2022, 10(11), 2184; https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare10112184 - 31 Oct 2022
Cited by 3 | Viewed by 1796
Abstract
The coronavirus pandemic shifted in-person environments to virtual environments. Little is known about the effectiveness of fully synchronous, virtual interprofessional education (IPE). This study aims to compare two IPE cases that occurred in-person pre-pandemic and virtual during-pandemic. Two cases are analyzed: a medical [...] Read more.
The coronavirus pandemic shifted in-person environments to virtual environments. Little is known about the effectiveness of fully synchronous, virtual interprofessional education (IPE). This study aims to compare two IPE cases that occurred in-person pre-pandemic and virtual during-pandemic. Two cases are analyzed: a medical error care and a charity care case. Participants were students from various health science disciplines. Assessments were captured through The Interprofessional Collaborative Competency Attainment Survey (ICCAS). Effect sizes were calculated for the pre-and post-surveys and analyzed using Cohen’s d for independent samples. From the in-person collection period, a total of 479 students participated in the medical error simulation and 479 in the charity care simulation. During the virtual collection period, a total of 506 students participated in the medical error simulation and 507 participated in the charity care simulation. In the data for the virtual simulations, the medical error case study maintained a large effect size (0.81) while the charity care simulation had a lesser impact (0.64 effect size). Structural details of the patient cases may be a critical variable. Future research is needed to better understand how health science students can obtain more training to notice the subtle cues from patients assessed through telemedicine modalities. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Innovations in Interprofessional Care and Training)
Show Figures

Figure 1

27 pages, 2389 KiB  
Article
Establishing the Competency Development and Talent Cultivation Strategies for Physician-Patient Shared Decision-Making Competency Based on the IAA-NRM Approach
by Shan-Fu Yu, Chih-Ming Hsu, Hui-Ting Wang, Tien-Tsai Cheng, Jia-Feng Chen, Chia-Li Lin and Hsing-Tse Yu
Healthcare 2022, 10(10), 1844; https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare10101844 - 23 Sep 2022
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 2669
Abstract
Shared decision making (SDM) is a collaborative process involving patients and their healthcare workers negotiating to reach a shared decision about medical care. However, various physician stakeholders (attending physicians, medical residents, and doctors in post-graduate years) may have different viewpoints on SDM processes. [...] Read more.
Shared decision making (SDM) is a collaborative process involving patients and their healthcare workers negotiating to reach a shared decision about medical care. However, various physician stakeholders (attending physicians, medical residents, and doctors in post-graduate years) may have different viewpoints on SDM processes. The purpose of this study is to explore the core competence of physicians in performing SDM tasks and to investigate the significant competency development aspects/criteria by applying the literature research and expert interviews. We adopt the IAA (importance awareness analysis) technique for different stakeholders to evaluate the status of competency development aspects/criteria and to determine the NRM (network relation map) based on the DEMATEL (decision-making trial and evaluation laboratory) technique. The study combines the IAA and NRM methods and suggests using the IAA-NRM approach to evaluate the adoption strategies and common suitable paths for different levels of physicians. Our findings reveal that SDM perception and practice is the primary influencer of SDM competence development for all stakeholders. The current model can help hospital administrators and directors of medical education understand the diverse stakeholders’ perspectives on the core competence of SDM tasks and determine common development plans. It provides strategic directions for SDM competency development and talent cultivation programs. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Innovations in Interprofessional Care and Training)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Other

Jump to: Editorial, Research

14 pages, 311 KiB  
Study Protocol
Digital Health Literacy and Physical Activity Programme for Improvement of Quality of Life in Caregivers of People with Dementia (CAREFIT): Study Protocol
by Patricia Ferrero-Sereno, Patricia Palomo-López, María Mendoza-Muñoz, Patricia Luna-Castaño, Raquel Caballero-De la Calle and Laura Muñoz-Bermejo
Healthcare 2025, 13(11), 1219; https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare13111219 - 22 May 2025
Viewed by 225
Abstract
Background/Objectives: Dementia involves progressive cognitive and functional deterioration that leads to dependence and overload on family caregivers. This overload has a negative impact on the physical, mental, emotional, and occupational health of caregivers, leading to occupational imbalance and problems arising from an [...] Read more.
Background/Objectives: Dementia involves progressive cognitive and functional deterioration that leads to dependence and overload on family caregivers. This overload has a negative impact on the physical, mental, emotional, and occupational health of caregivers, leading to occupational imbalance and problems arising from an inadequate distribution of time devoted to caregiving. This project aims to evaluate the effects of the technology-based CAREFIT programme, structured around physical activity interventions, education, and psychoemotional and social support, on the health-related quality of life and emotional well-being of informal caregivers. Methods: The experimental group will develop the intervention programme, which will last 8 weeks and combine educational activities, physical activities, and psychoemotional and social support. Before beginning the intervention, the entire experimental group will receive a training session and educational materials on how to access and use the platform. The CAREFIT platform will consist of two educational sessions and two weekly physical sessions, combined with psychoemotional and social support activities that participants must complete. Initial, final, and follow-up evaluations will be conducted. The HRQoL and psychoemotional health (stress, anxiety, depression, and perceived social support and burden) of caregivers of people with dementia will be the main outcome measures. The effects of the intervention on the study variables will be assessed using a repeated-measures analysis of variance (ANOVA). Conclusions: The proposed protocol for the CAREFIT programme represents an innovative and multidisciplinary initiative that leverages a digital platform to promote the well-being of informal caregivers of people with dementia. This approach combines health literacy and strengthened psychoemotional and social support. Through this integration, the goal is to reduce the levels of burden, stress, anxiety, and depression among primary caregivers, while strengthening their self-care capabilities and social support networks. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Innovations in Interprofessional Care and Training)
Show Figures

Figure 1

11 pages, 1014 KiB  
Viewpoint
Multimorbidity: Addressing the Elephant in the Clinic Room
by David Cosio
Healthcare 2025, 13(10), 1202; https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare13101202 - 21 May 2025
Viewed by 195
Abstract
Multimorbidity is the conjoint presence of multiple conditions in patients, which is a public health problem. Multimorbidity is like the elephant in the clinic room because it remains the unaddressed challenge we face in healthcare. Clinical health psychology has a role to play [...] Read more.
Multimorbidity is the conjoint presence of multiple conditions in patients, which is a public health problem. Multimorbidity is like the elephant in the clinic room because it remains the unaddressed challenge we face in healthcare. Clinical health psychology has a role to play in this undertaking because it recognizes the intersection and interface of concurrent mental and/or behavioral problems and physical diseases. The current article will define multimorbidity, describe current statistics, how it differs from comorbidity, how to use the biopsychosocial model, and ways in which clinical health psychologists can manage and prevent it in their clinics. A model of how to address multimorbidity will be shared using the role of a clinical health psychologist working in a multidisciplinary pain clinic in a hospital setting serving patients who are socioeconomically disadvantaged. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Innovations in Interprofessional Care and Training)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop