Next Article in Journal
Effectiveness of Physical and Therapy Interventions for Non-ICU Hospitalized Pneumonia Patients: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials
Previous Article in Journal
Effects of Hypopressive Techniques on the CORE Complex: A Systematic Review
Previous Article in Special Issue
Why Do Individuals with Diabetes Miss Their Dietitian Appointments? A Mixed-Methods Study on Barriers and Strategies for Improved Engagement in Diabetes Care
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
Review

What Do We Know About Contemporary Quality Improvement and Patient Safety Training Curricula in Health Workers? A Rapid Scoping Review

1
Department of Hygiene, Social-Preventive Medicine and Medical Statistics, School of Medicine, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, 54124 Thessaloniki, Greece
2
WHO Athens Quality of Care and Patient Safety Office, World Health Organization Regional Office for Europe, 10675 Athens, Greece
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Healthcare 2025, 13(12), 1445; https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare13121445
Submission received: 11 April 2025 / Revised: 7 June 2025 / Accepted: 13 June 2025 / Published: 16 June 2025
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Innovations in Interprofessional Care and Training)

Abstract

Background and Objective: Despite growing emphasis on quality and safety in healthcare, there remains a limited understanding of how Quality Improvement and Patient Safety (QI/PS) training for health workers has evolved in response to global events like the COVID-19 pandemic and the WHO Global Patient Safety Action Plan. This rapid scoping review aimed to not only identify existing curricula but also uncover trends, innovation gaps, and global inequities in QI/PS education—providing timely insights for reshaping future training strategies. Methods: We searched MEDLINE and Scopus for English-language studies published between January 2020 and April 2024, describing QI and/or PS curricula across graduate, postgraduate, and continuing education levels. All healthcare worker groups were eligible, with no geographic limitations. Two reviewers conducted independent screening and data extraction; a third verified the results. Results: Among 3290 records, 74 curricula met inclusion criteria, with a majority originating from the US (58, 78.4%) and targeting physicians—especially residents and fellows (43/46, 93.5%). Only 27% of curricula were multidisciplinary. While traditional didactic (66.2%) and interactive (73%) approaches remained prevalent, curricula launched after 2020 introduced novel formats such as Massive Open Online Courses and gamification, with long-term programs uniformly leveraging web-based platforms. Common thematic content included Root Cause Analysis, Plan-Do-Study-Act cycles, QI tools, communication skills, and incident reporting. English-language peer-reviewed published literature indicated a marked lack of structured QI/PS training in Europe, Asia, and Africa. Conclusions: This review reveals both an uneven development and fragmentation in global QI/PS training efforts, alongside emerging opportunities catalyzed by digital transformation and pandemic-era innovation. The findings highlight a critical gap: while interest in QI/PS is growing, scalable, inclusive, and evidence-based curricula remain largely concentrated in a few high-income countries. By mapping these disparities and innovations, this review provides actionable direction for advancing more equitable and modern QI/PS education worldwide, whilst showcasing the need to systematically delve into QI/PS training in underrepresented regions.
Keywords: quality of care; quality improvement; patient safety; health workers; training; curriculum; education; scoping review quality of care; quality improvement; patient safety; health workers; training; curriculum; education; scoping review

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Tsimtsiou, Z.; Pagkozidis, I.; Pappa, A.; Triantafyllou, C.; Vasileiou, C.; Stridborg, M.; Fonseca, V.R.; Breda, J. What Do We Know About Contemporary Quality Improvement and Patient Safety Training Curricula in Health Workers? A Rapid Scoping Review. Healthcare 2025, 13, 1445. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare13121445

AMA Style

Tsimtsiou Z, Pagkozidis I, Pappa A, Triantafyllou C, Vasileiou C, Stridborg M, Fonseca VR, Breda J. What Do We Know About Contemporary Quality Improvement and Patient Safety Training Curricula in Health Workers? A Rapid Scoping Review. Healthcare. 2025; 13(12):1445. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare13121445

Chicago/Turabian Style

Tsimtsiou, Zoi, Ilias Pagkozidis, Anna Pappa, Christos Triantafyllou, Constantina Vasileiou, Marie Stridborg, Válter R. Fonseca, and Joao Breda. 2025. "What Do We Know About Contemporary Quality Improvement and Patient Safety Training Curricula in Health Workers? A Rapid Scoping Review" Healthcare 13, no. 12: 1445. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare13121445

APA Style

Tsimtsiou, Z., Pagkozidis, I., Pappa, A., Triantafyllou, C., Vasileiou, C., Stridborg, M., Fonseca, V. R., & Breda, J. (2025). What Do We Know About Contemporary Quality Improvement and Patient Safety Training Curricula in Health Workers? A Rapid Scoping Review. Healthcare, 13(12), 1445. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare13121445

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Article metric data becomes available approximately 24 hours after publication online.
Back to TopTop