Qualitative Methods in Genealogical Research: New Approaches to Studying Intergenerational Memory
A special issue of Genealogy (ISSN 2313-5778).
Deadline for manuscript submissions: 26 July 2026 | Viewed by 1976
Editor
Interests: qualitative research; education; ethnicity; memory; film; genocide; holocaust studies; education; museum studies
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals
Special Issue Information
Dear Colleagues,
In the sociology of knowledge, some scholars argue that human memory can only function within a collective context (Halbwachs, 1968/2018). Others place the search for knowledge within the discipline of genealogy (Foucault, 2022; Mendoza, 2024). Qualitative research, on the other hand, is where sociology and philosophy intersect (Silverman, 2020; Adorno, 2022; Adorno, 1976). Genealogy, in the context of this volume, refers to the ancestry or history of a discipline, profession, or people (Haley, 1976/2021; Martin, 2016; Nietzsche, 1887/2022). Moreover, the advent of the Fourth Industrial Revolution has brought about change and continuity in qualitative research (Jung, 2019; Mosweu, 2025). Perhaps the image that best informs how we conduct research is that of “Sankofa,” which involves using past knowledge and experiences to build a different and better future (Bush et al, 2025; Ahmed & Gyamerah, 2025). Sankofa serves as a reminder that research is informed by historical knowledge and a remembrance of the past, and, as qualitative researchers, we remember the philosophical paradigms that shape our worldviews. The image of Sankofa is also a fitting reminder of the role that memory or history plays in how we understand research.
As we enter the Fourth Industrial Revolution, multiple paradigms and frameworks have emerged, making it possible to question and expand upon what is known and what might be accomplished through new studies of intergenerational memory. At the same time, the Fourth Industrial Revolution has not brought about the envisaged apocalypse nor has it brought about total integration (Hopenhayn, 2001). Cultures, buildings, and historical documents even serve as reminders of the role that intergenerational memory plays in society (Rusu & Croitoru, 2021). For example, Adorno’s “Never Again: Education After Auschwitz” is a reminder of the role of education in preventing a recurrence of Auschwitz (Adorno, 2005). Our understanding of life is shaped by long and complex histories, influenced by culture, place, time, power, and identity (Dussel, 2013), and memory enables us to better understand the paths that have led to the recent shift toward alternatives to the past and yearnings for new worlds (Mannheim, 1952/2018; Armah, 2013).
The interdisciplinary and rapidly growing field of qualitative research raises awareness about how we navigate and celebrate life. Given this context, authors will be expected to pursue their individual projects in light of the following set of broad research questions: In what places, genres, and media—narrative, visual, architectural, scholarly, educational, medical, etc.—are memories of the past articulated and elaborated? How does qualitative research expose or inform the types of erasure, erosion, and amnesia that accompany contemporary images of what is remembered? How do memories, both positive and negative, inform projects on human preservation and transformation? In what ways and contexts do memories/genealogies link up with Fourth Industrial Revolution educational debates and social projects? What challenges can new insights address on intergenerational memory? How are new technologies shaping the field of qualitative research? We ask this because, as we enter the Fourth Industrial Revolution, the interregnum presents an opportunity to give birth to something new in relation to the promises of the old paradigms (Armah, 1968/2021) or a relapse into barbarism (Horkheimer, 2019; Orwell, 1949). Finally, how do memories inform the value and purpose of the qualitative research community so many years after the publication of The Positivist Dispute in German Sociology and Minima Moralia: Reflections from Damaged Life?
We request that, prior to submitting a manuscript, interested authors initially submit a proposed title and an abstract of 200 words summarizing their intended contribution. Please send it to the Guest Editors mmalisa@uwf.edu or to the Genealogy Editorial Office (genealogy@mdpi.com). Abstracts will be reviewed by the Guest Editors for the purposes of ensuring their proper fit within the scope of the Special Issue. Full manuscripts will undergo double-blind peer-review.
References
Adorno, T. W. (1976). The Positivist Dispute in German Sociology. Heinemann.
Adorno, T. W. (2005). Constellations. Columbia University Press.
Adorno, T. W. (2022). Philosophy and Sociology. Polity Press
Adorno, T. W. (1949/2022). Minima Moralia: Reflections from Damaged Life. Verso Books.
Ahmed, A., & Gyamerah, K. 2025). Sankofa: Towards Africa-centered research methodological framework. International Journal of Social Research Methodology.
Armah, A. (2013). KMT: In the House of Life. Per Ankh.
Armah, A. (1968/2021). The Beautyful Ones Are Not Yet Born. Heinemann.
Bush, L. et al. (2025). Sankofa (Re)search Model: (RE)membering, (Re)storing, and (Re)birthing Black Boys and Men. Little Black Book.
Dussel, E. (2013). Ethics of Liberation: In the Age of Globalization and Exclusion. Duke University Press.
Foucault, M. (1982/2021). The Archaeology of Knowledge: And the Discourse on Language. Vintage.
Halbwachs, M. (1968/2018) Collective Memory. University of France.
Haley, A. (1976/2021). Roots: The Saga of an American Family.
Hopenhayn, M. (2001). No Apocalypse, No Integration: Modernism and Postmodernism in Latin America. Duke University Press.
Horkheimer, M. (2019). Towards a New Manifesto: Theodor Adorno & Max Horkheimer. Verso.
Jung, J. (2019). The Fourth Industrial Revolution, knowledge production and higher education in South Korea. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management. https://doi.org/10.1080/1360080X.2019.1660047.
Mannheim, K. (1952/2018). The Problem of Generations: Essays on the Sociology of Knowledge. Oxford University Press.
Martin, R. E. (2016). Historical Genealogy: The Evolving Definition and Uses of an Ancillary Historical Discipline: Guest Editor’s Introduction. Russian Studies in History, 55(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1080/10611983.2016.121401.
Mendoza, C. (2024). Genealogy of Knowledge.
Mosweu, T. (2025). Oral Traditions/Histories in Times of Technological Revolution and Pandemics in Society: A Wake-Up Call for Memory Institutions. Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
Nietzsche, F. (1887/2022). The Genealogy of Morals: A Polemic. Penguin Classics.
Orwell, G. (1949/ 2019). 1984. Mariner Books.
Rusu, M., & Croitoru, A. (2021). Memorial Ambivalences in Postcommunist Romania: Generational Attitudes towards the Symbolic Legacy of Communism. Genealogy.
Silverman, D. (2020). Qualitative Research. Sage Publications.
Dr. Mark Malisa
Guest Editor
Manuscript Submission Information
Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 250 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for assessment.
Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a double-anonymized peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Genealogy is an international peer-reviewed open access semimonthly journal published by MDPI.
Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 1400 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.
Keywords
- qualitative research
- Fourth Industrial Revolution
- memory
- genealogy
Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue
- Ease of navigation: Grouping papers by topic helps scholars navigate broad scope journals more efficiently.
- Greater discoverability: Special Issues support the reach and impact of scientific research. Articles in Special Issues are more discoverable and cited more frequently.
- Expansion of research network: Special Issues facilitate connections among authors, fostering scientific collaborations.
- External promotion: Articles in Special Issues are often promoted through the journal's social media, increasing their visibility.
- Reprint: MDPI Books provides the opportunity to republish successful Special Issues in book format, both online and in print.
Further information on MDPI's Special Issue policies can be found here.
