cancers-logo

Journal Browser

Journal Browser

Advances in Quantitative Imaging, AI, and Novel Imaging Techniques for Precision Radiology in Prostate Cancer

A special issue of Cancers (ISSN 2072-6694). This special issue belongs to the section "Methods and Technologies Development".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (31 March 2026) | Viewed by 2037

Special Issue Editors


E-Mail
Guest Editor
Oncoscore, Garrett Park, MD, USA
Interests: spectral/statistical techniques; quantitative imaging; multi- and bi- parametric MRI
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
New York Proton Center, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
Interests: proton therapy; prostate cancer; lung cancer; thoracic malignancies; machine learning

E-Mail
Guest Editor
Computer Science, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
Interests: AI medicine; deep learning; computer vision; multimodal medical image analysis; prostate cancer; multi-parametric MRI

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

Worldwide, approximately 1,000,000 men are diagnosed and 300,000 men die from prostate cancer (PCa) each year. PCa, therefore, poses a significant economic and societal burden. Proper patient care and management of PCa relies on the accurate detection and prognostication of malignant lesions, assessment for potential metastases, and evaluation of the possibility for further growth. Non-invasive prostate serum antigen (PSA) pre-screens and preliminary measurements assess the possible need for medical intervention. The widely implemented PSA indicator has significantly reduced PCa mortality, although its low specificity can lead to under- and overtreatment. When PSA values are above threshold levels, PCa is standardly diagnosed and risk stratified through 6–12 core transrectal ultrasound-based needle biopsy, supplemented with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). However, invasive biopsies present risks of pain, hemorrhage, and infection for patients. In addition, misplacement of the needle can underestimate the tumor Gleason score and inaccurately determine the patient’s status and optimal treatment approach.

To improve PCa diagnosis and grading, and to alleviate patient suffering, non-invasive strategies have been developed, such as imaging patients with suspected disease. The entire prostate gland can be non-invasively viewed, minimizing the likelihood of missing sampling from the most malignant part of a tumor. Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) fused with ultrasound (US), and positron emission tomography combined with computed tomography (PET/CT), are playing an increasingly important role in the early diagnosis of PCa. New biomarkers that target the membrane antigens, such as the Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen (PSMA) for PET, have been developed, greatly bolstering tumor and metastases detection. Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) is a semi-quantitative protocol for radiologists to visually assess multiple MRI sequences and combine them to predict the potential aggressiveness of a prostate tumor. Building on this, more quantitative approaches, including the application of artificial intelligence (AI) to imaging data and radiology reports, are showing promising results. AI harnesses the vast amount of imaging data and increasing computational power to deliver accurate, efficient, and reproducible analyses. Other quantitative approaches evaluate spatially registered multi-parametric MRI (mpMRI) and bi-parametric MRI (bpMRI), the latter of which excludes contrast-enhanced sequences. By avoiding contrast injection, bpMRI simplifies the imaging process and reduces patient burden while maintaining diagnostic value.

This Special Issue of Cancers, entitled “Advances in Quantitative Imaging, AI, and Novel Imaging Techniques for Precision Radiology in Prostate Cancer”, compiles articles on a number of research areas such as, but not restricted to, the following:

  1. Scanning patients with suspected PCa with a number of imaging modalities, such as multi-parametric MRI fused with ultrasound, and positron emission tomography combined with computed tomography (PET/CT), to detect prostate cancer and localize the lesion.
  2. Enhancements to AI applied to mpMRI through refinements of deep learning algorithms and texture generation.
  3. Foundation models—particularly vision-language models—enabling the integration of imaging data and corresponding textual reports, allowing for cross-modal understanding and completing tasks such as report generation, image-text retrieval, and multimodal representation learning.
  4. Combining patient data with imaging to predict clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa).
  5. Applying supervised and unsupervised target detection algorithms to spatially registered multi-parametric MRI to assess prostate cancer.
  6. Spatial registration techniques.
  7. Incorporating and combining novel biomarkers with imaging to predict clinically significant prostate cancer.
  8. Comparison of results from different clinics and/or clinical situations (i.e., different magnetic fields).
  9. Bi-parametric MRI assessments of prostate cancer.
  10. Biomarker development and testing of PSMA-PET for prostate cancer and metastases detection

Dr. Rulon R. Mayer
Dr. Charles Simone
Dr. Yuan Yuan
Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 250 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for assessment.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Cancers is an international peer-reviewed open access semimonthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2900 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • prostate cancer
  • multi-parametric MRI (mpMRI)
  • bi-parametric MRI
  • positron emission tomography (PET)
  • computed tomography (CT)
  • ultrasound (US)
  • artificial intelligence (AI)
  • convolutional neural network
  • visual language model
  • computer-aided diagnosis
  • spatially registered multi-parametric MRI
  • prostate specific membrane antigen in PET/CT

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

  • Ease of navigation: Grouping papers by topic helps scholars navigate broad scope journals more efficiently.
  • Greater discoverability: Special Issues support the reach and impact of scientific research. Articles in Special Issues are more discoverable and cited more frequently.
  • Expansion of research network: Special Issues facilitate connections among authors, fostering scientific collaborations.
  • External promotion: Articles in Special Issues are often promoted through the journal's social media, increasing their visibility.
  • Reprint: MDPI Books provides the opportunity to republish successful Special Issues in book format, both online and in print.

Further information on MDPI's Special Issue policies can be found here.

Published Papers (2 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

18 pages, 2394 KB  
Article
mpMRI-Based Risk Estimation to Optimize Prostate Cancer Patient Selection for Active Surveillance
by Veronica Wallaengen, Evangelia I. Zacharaki, Mohammad Alhusseini, Adrian L. Breto, Isabella M. Kimbel, Nachiketh Soodana-Prakash, Ahmad Algohary, Noah Lowry, Isaac R. L. Xu, Pedro F. Freitas, Sandra M. Gaston, Rosa P. Castillo Acosta, Oleksandr N. Kryvenko, Chad R. Ritch, Bruno Nahar, Mark L. Gonzalgo, Dipen J. Parekh, Alan Pollack, Sanoj Punnen and Radka Stoyanova
Cancers 2026, 18(5), 842; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers18050842 - 5 Mar 2026
Viewed by 470
Abstract
Background/Objectives: Active surveillance (AS) has emerged as a safe alternative to primary therapy for low- and select intermediate-risk prostate cancer (PCa), but optimal patient selection and surveillance strategies remain challenging due to limited risk stratification tools enabling early detection of lesions with high [...] Read more.
Background/Objectives: Active surveillance (AS) has emerged as a safe alternative to primary therapy for low- and select intermediate-risk prostate cancer (PCa), but optimal patient selection and surveillance strategies remain challenging due to limited risk stratification tools enabling early detection of lesions with high potential for histopathological progression. This study presents an integrated method for predicting prostate cancer progression within 12 months, aiming to improve AS patient selection by categorizing patients into two risk groups: rapid progressors who would benefit from immediate treatment and slow progressors suitable for AS. Methods: The risk assessment platform combines convolutional neural networks for automatic segmentation of prostate and suspicious-for-cancer lesions on multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) with logistic regression to estimate progression risk. The networks were trained on annotated lesions from radical prostatectomy specimen mapped to mpMRI. The prediction model incorporated pre-biopsy clinical variables (age, PSA, PI-RADS) and MRI-derived intratumoral radiomic features from 163 participants of a prospective clinical trial, using histopathological progression within 12 months as endpoint. Results: The clinical-radiomics model achieved an AUC of 0.84 in distinguishing rapid from slow progressors, using non-invasive monitoring techniques. In an independent test set, the model significantly improved AS patient selection, increasing negative predictive value by 18.5% compared to current standard-of-care (p < 0.001). Conclusions: The risk assessment platform shows promise for use during annual follow-up visits to reliably differentiate suitable AS candidates with stable disease from PCa patients who are likely to experience early progression. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

10 pages, 1141 KB  
Article
Is Systematic Biopsy Mandatory in All MRI-Guided Fusion Prostate Biopsies? A Machine Learning Prediction Model
by Omer Longo, Gil Raviv and Miki Haifler
Cancers 2026, 18(3), 517; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers18030517 - 4 Feb 2026
Viewed by 1073
Abstract
Objectives: To develop a prediction model able to accurately predict which patients will harbor higher risk prostate cancer in the systematic biopsy template compared to the targeted biopsy during MRI/US fusion biopsy. Methods: We included patients who underwent fusion biopsy. Clinical and radiographic [...] Read more.
Objectives: To develop a prediction model able to accurately predict which patients will harbor higher risk prostate cancer in the systematic biopsy template compared to the targeted biopsy during MRI/US fusion biopsy. Methods: We included patients who underwent fusion biopsy. Clinical and radiographic variables were collected from patients’ records. The outcome of the model was higher risk prostate cancer in the systematic compared with targeted biopsies. An extreme gradient boosting model was trained and tested. We evaluated variable importance and clinical benefit. Results: Five hundred and twenty-nine patients were included. Eighty-two (15.5%) patients had higher risk prostate cancer in the systematic biopsies. The area under the ROC curve and negative predictive value were 0.82 and 0.92, respectively. The four most important features for outcome prediction were prostate volume, PSAD, patient’s age, and PSA. The decision curve showed increased clinical benefit of our model at threshold probabilities of 0–0.5. Limitations include the retrospective design of the study and the lack of external validation of the model. Conclusions: We developed a prediction model able to accurately predict which patients must undergo systematic and targeted biopsy. This prediction model has the potential to help in the decision whether to perform SB and thus may lower the adverse event rate while keeping a high detection rate. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop