Emotion, Motivation, and Learning: Interdisciplinary Perspectives in Education

A Special Issue of Behavioral Sciences (ISSN 2076-328X) belonging to the section "Educational Psychology".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: 15 March 2027 | Viewed by 4356

Editors


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Physical Education Career, Universidad Autónoma de Chile, Temuco 478000, Chile
Interests: curriculum; curriculum design; pedagogical practices; education; pedagogical accompaniment
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

Emotions and motivation play fundamental roles in shaping how individuals engage with, process, and retain knowledge—far beyond being secondary variables in education, they represent the very foundation upon which meaningful learning, creativity, and personal development are built. Contemporary educational research has consistently demonstrated that affective and motivational factors determine not only the depth of cognitive processing, but also the persistence, satisfaction, and overall well-being of learners and educators alike.

This Special Issue of Behavioral Sciences, entitled “Emotion, Motivation, and Learning: Interdisciplinary Perspectives in Education,” seeks to bring together a wide range of empirical, theoretical, and applied studies that explore the intricate connections between emotion, motivation, and learning. We especially welcome contributions addressing emotional regulation, intrinsic and extrinsic motivation, socio-emotional learning, teacher and student emotions, and the neurobehavioral mechanisms underlying affective engagement and cognitive performance. Studies that examine the cultural, contextual, and technological dimensions of emotion and motivation in education are particularly encouraged, as these perspectives offer valuable insights into the diversity of emotional experiences across different societies, institutions, and learning modalities.

Furthermore, we invite contributions that address cognitive–emotional integration—the ways in which emotion and cognition co-regulate learning processes. Advances in cognitive neuroscience and educational psychology reveal that emotion is not separate from thought, but rather a constitutive element of reasoning, creativity, and problem-solving. These findings invite us to rethink pedagogical models, assessment practices, and teacher training programs from an affective–cognitive perspective, in which motivation, empathy, and regulation skills are as essential as intellectual rigor.

By integrating diverse disciplinary approaches—from psychology, pedagogy, and neuroscience to philosophy and the social sciences—this Special Issue aims to advance the dialog on the affective foundations of learning. It seeks to promote a deeper understanding of how emotional and motivational processes interact with cognitive and sociocultural factors, shaping human development in educational contexts marked by diversity, technology, and constant transformation.

We warmly encourage researchers, educators, and practitioners to submit their manuscripts to this Special Issue. Contributions may include original research, meta-analyses, theoretical reviews, or innovative case studies that explore the intersections between emotion, motivation, and learning from interdisciplinary and cross-cultural perspectives. By joining this conversation, authors will help expand a vital field of inquiry that has profound implications for educational policy, teacher education, and classroom practice.

Dr. Gerardo Fuentes-Vilugrón
Dr. Felipe Caamaño-Navarrete
Dr. Carlos Arriagada-Hernández
Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 250 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for assessment.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-anonymized peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Behavioral Sciences is an international peer-reviewed open access monthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2400 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • emotional regulation
  • motivation in education
  • socio-emotional learning
  • teacher and student emotions
  • affective neuroscience
  • educational well-being
  • emotional climate in schools
  • culturally responsive education
  • cognitive–emotional processes in learning
  • generativity and teacher development

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

  • Ease of navigation: Grouping papers by topic helps scholars navigate broad scope journals more efficiently.
  • Greater discoverability: Special Issues support the reach and impact of scientific research. Articles in Special Issues are more discoverable and cited more frequently.
  • Expansion of research network: Special Issues facilitate connections among authors, fostering scientific collaborations.
  • External promotion: Articles in Special Issues are often promoted through the journal's social media, increasing their visibility.
  • Reprint: MDPI Books provides the opportunity to republish successful Special Issues in book format, both online and in print.

Further information on MDPI's Special Issue policies can be found here.

Published Papers (6 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

25 pages, 657 KB  
Article
The Relationship Between Social-Emotional Learning Skills and Learning Motivation Among University Students: Exploring the Roles of Emotional Intelligence and Emotion Regulation
by Fatih Mutlu Özbilen and Alper Aytaç
Behav. Sci. 2026, 16(9), 1707; https://doi.org/10.3390/bs16091707 - 21 Sep 2026
Viewed by 382
Abstract
This study examined the relationships among university students’ social-emotional learning (SEL) skills, emotional intelligence, emotion regulation, and learning motivation, with particular attention to a proposed serial indirect relationship through emotional intelligence and emotion regulation. A cross-sectional correlational design was employed with 372 students [...] Read more.
This study examined the relationships among university students’ social-emotional learning (SEL) skills, emotional intelligence, emotion regulation, and learning motivation, with particular attention to a proposed serial indirect relationship through emotional intelligence and emotion regulation. A cross-sectional correlational design was employed with 372 students from the Faculties of Education and Arts and Sciences at a university in Türkiye, selected through stratified random cluster sampling. Data were analyzed using observed-variable path analysis in AMOS; the specific serial indirect effect in the original theoretical model was additionally estimated with PROCESS using bootstrap confidence intervals. SEL skills were positively related to learning motivation and emotional intelligence, emotional intelligence was positively related to emotion regulation, and emotion regulation was positively related to learning motivation. However, the direct relationships between SEL skills and emotion regulation and between emotional intelligence and learning motivation were not statistically significant. In the original theoretical model, the specific serial indirect relationship from SEL skills to learning motivation through emotional intelligence and emotion regulation was small and not statistically significant (β = 0.036, 95% CI [−0.0003, 0.0750]); therefore, the hypothesized serial indirect relationship was not supported. A post hoc parsimonious model excluding the two nonsignificant direct paths revealed a small but statistically significant serial indirect relationship (β = 0.043, 95% CI [0.005, 0.082]). This exploratory pattern should be interpreted cautiously and requires replication through longitudinal or experimental research. The findings may also inform curriculum developers by identifying social-emotional dimensions that warrant consideration in needs analysis and future curriculum-design and intervention studies in higher education, particularly in teacher education. Full article
►▼ Show Figures

Figure 1

13 pages, 218 KB  
Article
Receiving Peer Evaluation in Team-Based Learning: A Descriptive Phenomenological Study of Preclinical Medical Students
by Bomyee Lee and Su Jin Chae
Behav. Sci. 2026, 16(9), 1462; https://doi.org/10.3390/bs16091462 - 23 Aug 2026
Viewed by 274
Abstract
Learning from feedback depends not only on the feedback provided but also on how learners interpret, evaluate, and respond to it. This descriptive phenomenological study explored how preclinical medical students experienced receiving peer evaluation in a team-based learning (TBL) course. Forty-one reflective journals [...] Read more.
Learning from feedback depends not only on the feedback provided but also on how learners interpret, evaluate, and respond to it. This descriptive phenomenological study explored how preclinical medical students experienced receiving peer evaluation in a team-based learning (TBL) course. Forty-one reflective journals written by first-year medical students (27 men, 14 women) after receiving anonymous peer feedback were analyzed using Colaizzi’s seven-step descriptive phenomenological method. Five interrelated themes emerged: preparing to contribute, encountering oneself through peers’ eyes, making sense of emotional responses, transforming feedback into future practice, and becoming a responsible evaluator. Students described peer feedback as a social mirror that revealed differences between their self-perceptions and those of their peers. They reported a range of emotional responses and also reflected on the credibility and relevance of the feedback they received. Many students expressed intentions for future participation, and some reflected on their own responsibilities as evaluators. Taken together, the accounts described self-reflection, emotional appraisal, and intentions for future participation after peer evaluation. The findings suggest that peer evaluation accompanied by open-ended reflection may provide a useful context for examining how students experience and make sense of feedback. Whether such reflection contributes to subsequent changes in behavior, feedback literacy, self-regulated learning, or professionalism requires further study. Full article
23 pages, 1055 KB  
Article
Types of Punishment and Self-Reported Willingness to Change Behavior: Chain Mediation by Perceived Motivation for Punishment and Trust, and the Moderating Role of Group Relationship
by Zhen Zhang, Li Kong and Chunhui Qi
Behav. Sci. 2026, 16(8), 1450; https://doi.org/10.3390/bs16081450 - 21 Aug 2026
Viewed by 427
Abstract
Correcting student misconduct is a central issue in educational psychology and classroom management; teachers often use punishment to correct students’ inappropriate behavior. Numerous empirical studies have shown that punishment influences individuals’ willingness to change their behavior, but the underlying mechanisms remain to be [...] Read more.
Correcting student misconduct is a central issue in educational psychology and classroom management; teachers often use punishment to correct students’ inappropriate behavior. Numerous empirical studies have shown that punishment influences individuals’ willingness to change their behavior, but the underlying mechanisms remain to be elucidated. This study employed a scenario simulation method to survey 240 middle school students, aiming to explore the relationship between types of punishment and students‘ self-reported willingness to change their behavior in response to hypothetical scenarios. Furthermore, the study examined the chained mediating effects of perceived punishment motivation and trust, as well as the moderating effect of group relationship. The results showed that perceived punishment motivation and trust exert a chained mediating effect between punishment type and self-reported willingness to change behavior. Punishment first is associated with enhanced perception of the prosocial motivation behind the punishment, which in turn is associated with higher trust in the punishing teacher, and ultimately with greater self-reported willingness of misbehaving students to change their behavior; that is, perception of punishment motivation and trust sequentially transmit the effects of punishment. Furthermore, this transmission process is moderated by group relationship: when the punisher is a teacher (in-group), the influence of punishment type on students’ self-reported willingness through perceived punishment motivation and trust is stronger, whereas this effect is not significant when the punisher is an AI (out-group). These findings reveal the psychological pathway through which punishment influences self-reported willingness to change behavior in a hypothetical scenario via sequential processing of cognitive attribution (perceived punishment motivation) and attitudinal evaluation (trust), and highlight the moderating role of group relationship in this process. Full article
►▼ Show Figures

Figure 1

17 pages, 1392 KB  
Article
Learning Support, Digital Constraints, and Online Learning Outcomes Among Pre-Service Teachers in China’s Government-Funded Teacher Education Program: The Mediating Role of Self-Regulated Learning
by Lanzi Huang, Lingqin Zeng, Jianwen Guo, Xian Liu, Boyuan Duan, Xiaoxuan Zhang and Zhao Cheng
Behav. Sci. 2026, 16(8), 1409; https://doi.org/10.3390/bs16081409 - 17 Aug 2026
Viewed by 432
Abstract
Drawing on Self-Determination Theory, this study examines how perceived learning support, smartphone addiction, and user resistance jointly shape online learning outcomes among Chinese pre-service teachers. Data from 1134 participants enrolled in China’s government-funded targeted teacher education program-primarily oriented toward strengthening the supply of [...] Read more.
Drawing on Self-Determination Theory, this study examines how perceived learning support, smartphone addiction, and user resistance jointly shape online learning outcomes among Chinese pre-service teachers. Data from 1134 participants enrolled in China’s government-funded targeted teacher education program-primarily oriented toward strengthening the supply of teachers for basic education, especially in central and western China, were analyzed using Mplus 8.3. The results showed that perceived learning support was positively associated with learning outcomes, whereas smartphone addiction was negatively associated with them. The role of user resistance was more complex in the full structural model and should therefore be interpreted with caution. Self-regulated learning (SRL) strategies served as a key mediator: perceived learning support improved learning outcomes partly by fostering SRL, while smartphone addiction hindered learning outcomes by weakening SRL. By examining a distinctive cohort of pre-service teachers, this study highlights the importance of supportive learning conditions and institutional context in online learning, and identifies SRL as a key learning process through which learning support and digital constraints are associated with learning outcomes. Full article
►▼ Show Figures

Graphical abstract

22 pages, 2149 KB  
Article
Beyond Ease of Use: Dynamics of Technology Adoption and Cognitive Load in AI-Assisted Programming for Non-Technical Students
by Rafael Mellado, Claudio Cubillos and Silvana Roncagliolo
Behav. Sci. 2026, 16(8), 1405; https://doi.org/10.3390/bs16081405 - 17 Aug 2026
Viewed by 633
Abstract
The integration of Generative AI (GenAI) into non-STEM education introduces cognitive demands that challenge static interpretations of technology acceptance. Evidence on GenAI acceptance is drawn largely from cross-sectional designs applied to general-purpose academic tasks and for computing students who already hold prior technical [...] Read more.
The integration of Generative AI (GenAI) into non-STEM education introduces cognitive demands that challenge static interpretations of technology acceptance. Evidence on GenAI acceptance is drawn largely from cross-sectional designs applied to general-purpose academic tasks and for computing students who already hold prior technical knowledge, leaving unresolved how acceptance perceptions evolve when non-technical students confront sustained high-load programming work. To address this gap, a pre-test/post-test randomized field experiment with repeated measures was conducted with 117 Chilean Accounting and Auditing undergraduates assigned to a control group (instructional videos; n = 57) or an experimental group (Google Gemini 1.5; n = 60). Participants completed Java programming exercises that increased in cognitive complexity, ranging from basic conditionals to vector operations. The study did not assess objective learning outcomes; instead, it tracked changes in user perceptions through a hybrid motivational framework integrating Perceived Ease of Use and Behavioral Intention with Perceived Enjoyment and Value/Usefulness. Baseline results showed lower initial Perceived Ease of Use in the GenAI group, consistent with initial cognitive friction. Post-intervention analyses indicated that the control group showed a significant increase only in Behavioral Intention, whereas the experimental group showed statistically significant within-group gains across all measured dimensions. These findings suggest that, for non-STEM students, the perceived ease and value of GenAI are not necessarily immediate but may develop through sustained interaction with cognitively demanding tasks. The study contributes to technology acceptance research by framing ease of use as an acquired proficiency in high-friction GenAI learning environments. Full article
►▼ Show Figures

Figure 1

14 pages, 563 KB  
Article
Affective-Motivational Processes in TVET Internships: Challenge, Hindrance, School Support, and Vocational Persistence
by Cheng-Ze Hung, Stanley Y. B. Huang and Chien-Hsiang Huang
Behav. Sci. 2026, 16(6), 995; https://doi.org/10.3390/bs16060995 - 15 Jun 2026
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 738
Abstract
Curricular internships are affective-motivational learning contexts in which students encounter real workplace demands while educational institutions remain responsible for learning, engagement, and well-being. Responding to the Special Issue theme of emotion, motivation, and learning, this three-wave study used temporally separated self-report data to [...] Read more.
Curricular internships are affective-motivational learning contexts in which students encounter real workplace demands while educational institutions remain responsible for learning, engagement, and well-being. Responding to the Special Issue theme of emotion, motivation, and learning, this three-wave study used temporally separated self-report data to examine challenge demands, hindrance demands, and school support among 860 Taiwanese technical and vocational education and training (TVET) interns. Challenge demands were positively associated with work engagement, which was associated with innovative behavior. Hindrance demands were positively associated with burnout, which was associated with intention to seek work outside the trained vocational field. The hindrance demands-burnout association was weaker when school support was higher. The findings are compatible with treating school support as a curricular psychological resource that may help students interpret and manage obstructive internship conditions. More broadly, the study suggests that work-integrated learning systems may support vocational persistence by designing internships as supervised affective-motivational learning environments rather than as placements alone. Full article
►▼ Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop