Mental Health Development under Contextual Adversity and Psychosocial Stress

A special issue of Behavioral Sciences (ISSN 2076-328X). This special issue belongs to the section "Health Psychology".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (28 February 2026) | Viewed by 11963

Special Issue Editor


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
College of Education, University of Missouri, St. Louis, MO 63121, USA
Interests: adolescent and young adult development; learning and cognition; applied machine learning; educational psychology; neuroeducation; growth modeling; assessment and measurement; multidimensional scaling

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

Individuals frequently face adversities or stressors in daily social interactions, such as feeling ignored, disrespected, hostile, or discriminated against. While some can manage these stresses or contextual adversity constructively, others may struggle, leading to common mental health issues such as worries, fear, anxiety, and depression. What could the etiology of such individual differences be in mental health? Beck's cognitive bias theory of depression states that depression is primarily the result of negative thought patterns and cognitive biases that distort an individual's perception of reality. However, we would like to ask, "Where do the negative thought patterns and cognitive biases come from?" In other words, if underlying these cognitive biases and automatic thoughts are latent cognitive structures (known as schemas) formed based on early experiences, contextual adversities are essential to understanding the etiology of mental health. For example, the theoretical framework of constructivism, according to which individuals construct their own understanding and knowledge of the world through experiences and reflection on those experiences, can provide a way to understand the etiology of mental health development. It offers a framework for understanding how individuals perceive and respond to their psychological experiences when encountering contextual adversity, specifically by constructing personal meaning and, therefore, reality. In addition, the effects of contextual adversity can also be examined from the neurobiological and developmental perspectives.

In this Special Issue, we seek high-quality studies examining the connection between contextual adversity (e.g., trauma or stressful events) and psychosocial adaptation related to mental health development by elucidating the pathways or mechanisms underlying this connection from various perspectives. We welcome high-quality empirical studies, theoretical papers, and reviews (including meta-analyses) with well-articulated rationales and sound methodologies.

Prof. Dr. Cody S. Ding
Guest Editor

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 250 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for assessment.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Behavioral Sciences is an international peer-reviewed open access monthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2200 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • contextual adversity
  • mental health development
  • constructivism, perceived stress, trauma

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

  • Ease of navigation: Grouping papers by topic helps scholars navigate broad scope journals more efficiently.
  • Greater discoverability: Special Issues support the reach and impact of scientific research. Articles in Special Issues are more discoverable and cited more frequently.
  • Expansion of research network: Special Issues facilitate connections among authors, fostering scientific collaborations.
  • External promotion: Articles in Special Issues are often promoted through the journal's social media, increasing their visibility.
  • Reprint: MDPI Books provides the opportunity to republish successful Special Issues in book format, both online and in print.

Further information on MDPI's Special Issue policies can be found here.

Published Papers (3 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

Jump to: Other

14 pages, 386 KB  
Article
The Buffer Effect of Social Identity on Psychological Stress in Different Competition Conditions
by Xiaohan Li, Kun Shi and Hua Zhang
Behav. Sci. 2026, 16(3), 352; https://doi.org/10.3390/bs16030352 - 2 Mar 2026
Viewed by 422
Abstract
Psychological stress arises when perceived situational demands exceed an individual’s available coping resources. Beyond individual differences and broader contextual factors, an individual’s emotional connection to a group (i.e., social identity) may shape stress appraisals and physiological reactivity. Across two laboratory experiments with 180 [...] Read more.
Psychological stress arises when perceived situational demands exceed an individual’s available coping resources. Beyond individual differences and broader contextual factors, an individual’s emotional connection to a group (i.e., social identity) may shape stress appraisals and physiological reactivity. Across two laboratory experiments with 180 college students, we examined whether making social identity salient influences acute stress responses under different competitive frames, comparing intragroup versus intergroup competition. In Experiment 1, participants in the social-identity condition showed numerically lower cardiovascular reactivity than those in the personal-identity condition, but between-condition differences were not statistically significant. In Experiment 2, the Identity × Competition interaction was statistically significant for heart-rate (HR) reactivity, indicating that the effect of identity salience differed across competition frames; however, this interaction did not generalize to systolic/diastolic blood pressure (SBP/DBP) or subjective stress. We also observed higher HR reactivity in intragroup than intergroup competition in this protocol, which we interpret cautiously given the limited consistency across outcomes. Overall, the findings suggest that any identity-related modulation of acute stress responding may be context-dependent and modality-specific, underscoring the importance of competitive framing when evaluating the stress-related consequences of social identity. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

19 pages, 538 KB  
Article
Psychological Adjustment and Tolerance for Psychological Pain: A Chain Mediation Model of Stress Mindset and Perceived Stress
by Metin Çelik, Hasan Batmaz, Nuri Türk and Sümeyye Derin
Behav. Sci. 2026, 16(1), 151; https://doi.org/10.3390/bs16010151 - 21 Jan 2026
Viewed by 1007
Abstract
Stressful life events can cause individuals to experience psychological pain. Tolerating psychological pain depends on the ability to psychologically adjust to challenging situations and to view stress as enhancing. Therefore, this study aimed to examine the path from psychological adjustment to tolerance for [...] Read more.
Stressful life events can cause individuals to experience psychological pain. Tolerating psychological pain depends on the ability to psychologically adjust to challenging situations and to view stress as enhancing. Therefore, this study aimed to examine the path from psychological adjustment to tolerance for psychological pain in terms of perceived stress and stress mindset. The study sample consisted of 709 adults from Turkey. A hypothetical model was tested using a chain mediation analysis. The study findings indicated that psychological adjustment predicted tolerance for psychological pain. Perceived stress and stress mindset were also found to have a chain mediating effect on the relationship between psychological adjustment and tolerance for psychological pain. The results are expected to contribute to programs and practices developed by mental health professionals to improve tolerance for psychological pain. These practices may specifically aim to increase psychological adjustment and an enhancing stress mindset. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Other

Jump to: Research

24 pages, 704 KB  
Systematic Review
The Effect of Social–Emotional Learning Programs on Elementary and Middle School Students’ Academic Achievement: A Meta-Analytic Review
by Yuyang Zhao and Biao Sang
Behav. Sci. 2025, 15(11), 1527; https://doi.org/10.3390/bs15111527 - 10 Nov 2025
Cited by 5 | Viewed by 9661
Abstract
This meta-analysis summarized the effects of universal and targeted social and emotional learning (SEL) programs in 22 studies with 24,510 elementary and middle schoolers between 2011 and 2021. It is critical to note that the evidence base was dominated by elementary school research [...] Read more.
This meta-analysis summarized the effects of universal and targeted social and emotional learning (SEL) programs in 22 studies with 24,510 elementary and middle schoolers between 2011 and 2021. It is critical to note that the evidence base was dominated by elementary school research (20 studies), with findings for middle school students derived from only two studies. The current study focused on three main issues: (a) the effectiveness of SEL programs on students’ overall academic performance as well as in specific subjects; (b) possible moderators that could differentiate the overall effectiveness of SEL programs; and (c) possible moderators that presented different effects in different grade levels and subject areas. The results of this review indicated that SEL interventions had a positive effect on overall academic achievement (g = 0.08), elementary school students (g = 0.075), middle school students (g = 0.122), English language arts (g = 0.07), mathematics (g = 0.08), science (g = 0.06), and GPA (g = 0.33) compared to alternative interventions or standard practice. Subgroup analysis was performed with several moderators (i.e., student SES, intervention design, grade level, subject area, and report type). A significant difference was found based on intervention design, with quasi-experimental studies showing larger effect sizes than randomized controlled trials (RCTs). The categorical moderation analysis was performed based on the student’s grade level and subject area and found significant differences. Overall, SEL programs with quasi-experimental designs might be more beneficial for promoting students’ academic performance. Given the limited evidence, conclusions regarding middle school students are preliminary, and more studies on middle school students and students’ science performance are needed. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop