Respiratory Diseases of Companion Animals

A special issue of Animals (ISSN 2076-2615). This special issue belongs to the section "Companion Animals".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: 31 December 2025 | Viewed by 2316

Special Issue Editor


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Small Animal Diseases with Clinic, Institute of Veterinary Medicine, Warsaw University of Life Sciences–SGGW, Nowoursynowska 159c, 02-776 Warsaw, Poland
Interests: infectious diseases of dogs and cats; echocardiography of dogs and cats; ultrasound examination of the lungs
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

Respiratory diseases in dogs and cats are considered part of general internal medicine, or cardiology. Moreover, there are few veterinarians specializing in this field, with only a few specialized departments. Therefore, research on respiratory diseases in dogs and cats is sparse. For the definitive diagnosis of respiratory diseases, endoscopic examination and imaging tests, such as CT/MRI under general anesthesia, are often necessary. However, they are not always possible in all cases owing to the risk of general anesthesia and other facility issues. This is one of the reasons why there has been so little research on respiratory diseases. Although a few reports have been made in Europe and the United States, these results cannot necessarily be applicable to dogs and cats in Japan and other Asian countries because the popular breeds are different from those in Europe and the United States. Consequently, we call for research on respiratory diseases in dogs and cats, especially in non-European countries and the United States.

Prof. Dr. Olga Szaluś-Jordanow
Guest Editor

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Animals is an international peer-reviewed open access semimonthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2400 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • dog
  • cat
  • respiratory medicine
  • nose
  • trachea
  • bronchus
  • lung
  • mediastinum
  • pleural cavity
  • neoplasia
  • infections disease
  • inflammatory disease

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

  • Ease of navigation: Grouping papers by topic helps scholars navigate broad scope journals more efficiently.
  • Greater discoverability: Special Issues support the reach and impact of scientific research. Articles in Special Issues are more discoverable and cited more frequently.
  • Expansion of research network: Special Issues facilitate connections among authors, fostering scientific collaborations.
  • External promotion: Articles in Special Issues are often promoted through the journal's social media, increasing their visibility.
  • Reprint: MDPI Books provides the opportunity to republish successful Special Issues in book format, both online and in print.

Further information on MDPI's Special Issue policies can be found here.

Published Papers (2 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

14 pages, 3446 KiB  
Article
Comparison of Radiography and Ultrasound for Diagnosis of Rib Fractures in Canine Cadavers
by Cole Harding, Søren R. Boysen, Cameron G. Knight, Sally L. Sukut, Madison Hillstead, Ashley Finch and Julie Menard
Animals 2025, 15(8), 1087; https://doi.org/10.3390/ani15081087 - 9 Apr 2025
Viewed by 550
Abstract
Human studies suggest point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) is superior to radiographs for diagnosing rib fractures, but its efficacy in veterinary medicine remains unclear. This study aimed to compare the sensitivity and specificity of POCUS and digital radiographs for detecting rib fractures in canine cadavers, [...] Read more.
Human studies suggest point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) is superior to radiographs for diagnosing rib fractures, but its efficacy in veterinary medicine remains unclear. This study aimed to compare the sensitivity and specificity of POCUS and digital radiographs for detecting rib fractures in canine cadavers, using necropsy as the reference standard. Nine canine cadavers were randomly assigned to either a fracture or control group, with fractures created surgically. Blinded evaluations were performed by an expert and novice sonographer, as well as a board-certified radiologist and a novice radiograph interpreter. Sensitivity and specificity for detecting rib fractures were 83% and 99.74% for ultrasound and 82% and 99.22% for radiographs, with no significant difference between modalities. However, the time required to identify rib fractures varied significantly, with ultrasound taking considerably longer than radiograph interpretation. The expert and novice sonographers required an average of 26 and 64 min, respectively, whereas the radiologist and novice radiograph interpreter took 3 and 10 min. These findings suggest that POCUS and radiographs provide comparable accuracy in detecting rib fractures in canine cadavers. Excluding the time required to obtain radiographs, ultrasound takes longer than radiograph interpretation to identify rib fractures. While POCUS remains a valuable diagnostic tool, its practicality in a clinical setting needs further investigation. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Respiratory Diseases of Companion Animals)
Show Figures

Figure 1

17 pages, 2022 KiB  
Article
Diagnostic Utility of Canine C-Reactive Protein, Haptoglobin, and 25-Hydroxyvitamin-D in Dogs with Nasal Cavity Disease
by Sarah Rösch, Julia Woitas and Gerhard Ulrich Oechtering
Animals 2024, 14(19), 2908; https://doi.org/10.3390/ani14192908 - 9 Oct 2024
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1220
Abstract
In this prospective blinded study, canine C-reactive protein (c-CRP), haptoglobin (HPT), and 25-hydroxyvitamin-D (25(OH)D) were investigated for their diagnostic value in 55 dogs with nasal cavity disease (ND). After comprehensive diagnostics including a culture-dependent microbiological examination (ME) of nasal swabs, 17 dogs were [...] Read more.
In this prospective blinded study, canine C-reactive protein (c-CRP), haptoglobin (HPT), and 25-hydroxyvitamin-D (25(OH)D) were investigated for their diagnostic value in 55 dogs with nasal cavity disease (ND). After comprehensive diagnostics including a culture-dependent microbiological examination (ME) of nasal swabs, 17 dogs were excluded due to additionally detected systemic diseases or steroid pre-treatment. Included were 25 dogs with malignant ND (13 carcinomas and 12 sarcomas) and 30 dogs with benign ND (7 benign tumors, 13 idiopathic rhinitis (IR), and 10 others), as well as 10 controls. In none of the 72 dogs with ND was primary bacterial rhinitis diagnosed. Although within the reference interval, compared to the controls, c-CRP was significantly higher in dogs with ND in general and in every subgroup except for benign tumors. Serum HPT concentrations were not different among groups. Compared to the controls, 25(OH)D concentrations were significantly lower (p = 0.041) in malignant ND and sarcomas (p = 0.025). Despite pre-treatment with antibiotics (40/54; 74.1%), in 23/51 (45%) dogs, the ME was positive. Cultivated bacteria did not differ significantly between nasal diseases. The serum markers were not significantly different regarding the positivity of ME. In conclusion, the investigated serum markers were not clinically useful for the reliable detection of canine ND, as was the ME. Because of the low number of dogs with IR and positive or negative ME, further studies regarding c-CRP are needed in a larger group of IR dogs without concomitant diseases to reliably evaluate its utility in IR dogs with suspected secondary bacterial nasal infection. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Respiratory Diseases of Companion Animals)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop